Laserfiche WebLink
2015-11-24 MINUTES 3 <br /> <br />THOSE PRESENT & TESTIFYING: ALAN CRANKOVICH felt the proposal was a <br />dramatic change. He said besides being in charge of the County budget it’s the second most <br />important function of the County Commissioners. He spoke against the County Commissioners <br />giving their decision making authority to a Hearings Examiner and felt it would never eliminate <br />the opportunity for litigation and be a disservice to the citizens of Kittitas County, if approved. <br />PAULA THOMPSON felt a Hearing Examiner would not have any idea of what goes on, as the <br />Planning Commission does, as well as the previous Board of Adjustment. The County <br />Commissioners live within the County and know the people, culture and issues. THERE <br />BEING NO OTHERS REQUESTING TO TESTIFY, THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE <br />HEARING RELATING TO THE ISSUE WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER JEWELL moved to deny Docket No. 15-12, as presented. CHAIRMAN <br />BERNDT seconded. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER JEWELL described his opinion of why he was against the proposal. <br />COMMISSIONER O’BRIEN felt due to the complexity of decisions, someone who is familiar <br />with laws would better serve the citizens. He noted the Hearing Examiner was hired a long time <br />ago and is familiar with the County and how the citizens would get the best service from <br />someone who is trained in the details. CHAIRMAN BERNDT described how the issues can be <br />complex and when he was elected he had no knowledge of findings of fact, conclusions of law, <br />legal research and felt how it can be daunting at times. He understood Commissioner Jewell and <br />former Commissioner Crankovich’s concerns and indicated he only wants what is best for the <br />citizens and it seemed they are now at a crossroads but would vote in favor of the motion. <br /> <br />Motion carried 2-1 to deny the request to authorize the Hearing Examiner to make final land use <br />decisions. (Commissioner O’Brien opposed the motion). <br /> <br />DOCKET 15-06 – CONSERVATION EASEMENT <br /> <br />ANGELA SAN FILIPPO, STAFF PLANNER reviewed proposed changes to Kittitas County <br />Chapter 13.35 which would allow subdivisions without requiring mitigation when a conservation <br />easement is placed on the property which could be removed by a subdivision amendment. <br /> <br />THOSE PRESENT & TESTIFYING: MARGE BRANDSRUD submitted a letter into the <br />record and asked for clarification of the proposed changes. She felt the language was vague and <br />open to abuse and asked if the easement would continue with changes in ownership and would <br />the subdivision adhere to underlying zoning. PAULA THOMPSON questioned the minimum <br />lot size. She expressed support of the amendment and felt it was a good idea to allow people to <br />split property who have no intentions on developing it and therefore no need for a well. KAREN <br />POULSEN commented on the proposal and felt there was a legal definition for conservation <br />easement and suggested changing the title. THERE BEING NO OTHERS REQUESTING <br />TO TESTIFY, THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING RELATING TO THE <br />ISSUE WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />There was Board discussion on the proposed amendment. COMMISSIONER JEWELL moved <br />to approve the amendment to Kittitas County Chapter 13.35, as presented. CHAIRMAN