Laserfiche WebLink
2015-11-24 MINUTES 2 <br /> <br />how the proposed changes did not support farmers and urged the Board to deny the proposed <br />changes. URBAN EBERHART, MEMBER OF KITTITAS COUNTY FARM BUREAU <br />AND KITTITAS COUNTY RECLAMATION DISTRICT reviewed portions of the proposed <br />changes and did not support the changes as they would have a negative impact to landowners. <br />KEITH ESLINGER, A MEMBER OF THE FARM BUREAU MEMBER supported the <br />previous testimony given and said he was against the 500 square cubic yard requirements for <br />farmers needing to obtain permits in order to move dirt around within their own property. <br />KAREN POULSEN provided examples grading and said if someone plowed a one acre field, 1 <br />foot deep, it would equal 50,000 cubic yards of material and how no one should have to go into <br />the Public Works Department each time and obtain a permit. She felt specific words could result <br />in unintended consequences. MARK CHARLTON, FARM BUREAU PRESIDENT said he <br />had worked on irrigation and there are ways of creating better water savings, less erosion, and <br />felt the proposed language would be very limiting and the County should readdress the 500 <br />square cubic yards. BRENT MELLEGARD opposed changes and felt it should go back to the <br />original document. PAULA THOMPSON spoke against the proposed changes as the farmer’s <br />purpose is to grow and the proposed changes would prevent them from doing so. THERE <br />BEING NO OTHERS REQUESTING TO TESTIFY, THE PUBLIC PORTION <br />RELATING TO THE ISSUE WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER JEWELL said he had worked with some of the Farm Bureau members in <br />creating some of the language. He said it was not unusual to change farm pasture from one use <br />to another due to changes to crops, irrigation infrastructure, etc. He felt agriculture activities <br />relating to traditional farming need to be exempt from the 500 cubic yard requirements. <br />COMMISSIONER O’BRIEN said he thought the issue was more about developers changing <br />land in its entirety and would be in favor of exempting farming, but would like to take a look at <br />the language a little more in depth. CHAIRMAN BERNDT agreed with Commissioner Jewells <br />suggestions. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER JEWELL moved to approve Docket Item No. 15-10, eliminating the <br />limitation on agriculture activities and to allow the activities to continue. COMMISSIONER <br />O’BRIEN seconded. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> <br />DOCKET 15-12 - HEARING EXAMINER <br /> <br />ANGELA SAN FILIPPO, STAFF PLANNER and DOC HANSEN, PLANNING <br />OFFICIAL/INTERIM PLANNING DIRECTOR explained the proposed changes to Title <br />15A, authorizing the Hearing Examiner to make final land use decisions. The proposed changes <br />would allow the Commissioners to focus more on policy, better concentrate on policy-making <br />and reduce the local government liability exposure through what should be more consistent <br />legally sustainable quasi-judicial decisions. It was noted the Hearing Examiner would be hired <br />by the Board of County Commissioners and would serve at their will. COMMISSIONER <br />O’BRIEN explained various reasons for supporting the proposal including the ability to discuss <br />matters with constituents and to engage with them one on one. COMMISSIONER JEWELL <br />described reasons why he opposed the changes and believed the elected officials should be <br />responsible for decision making and not a Hearing Examiner. <br />