Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Health Minutes <br />December 15, 2016 <br />3 of 4 <br />procedures to sell. They are regulated through the state as well. The increased fee is hard to absorb as the <br />fee is more expensive than King County. They are also required to have a food handler's card while they <br />are not cooking food, and only operating four hours a week. Mr. Cox would like to propose keeping the <br />fee the same and not increasing it. <br />Mark Nelson, Kittitas County resident and local septic designer, stepped to the microphone. Mr. Nelson <br />stated that the OSS redesign fee being more than the same designer fee seems steep, since the county has <br />already seen the design, just a different designer. Not sure that this should be the case. Mr. Nelson also <br />noted that when there are multiple site evaluations in one location, the fee should not increase to $550.00, <br />but should be less. <br />Jeremy Bach, Bach Well Drilling and Kittitas County resident, stepped to the microphone. Mr. Bach <br />stated that he has been drilling wells in the county for a long time and the increases in the Well Site <br />Review have increased in the last seven years from about $70-75.00. Processes and procedures are still <br />the same. The fee increase seems a bit excessive over the last six to seven years. Other delegated counties <br />(like ours) don't even charge this fee and noted a few of those counties. He also commented that the <br />county also gets a kickback from the Department of Ecology for each well inspected. Mr. Bach also <br />pointed out that the lab sampling fee (the one the county has to actually go out and take) has decreased. <br />Mr. Bach noted that he knows there was a new fee methodology implemented, but it makes no sense how <br />lab sampling goes down 23%, but the Well Site Review permit, in which someone sits in the office to <br />process paperwork, goes up 26%. That was all he had. <br />Bambi Miller, Kittitas County resident, and is also a Farmer's Market board member noted that an <br />increase from $180.00 to 330.00 (an 83% increase) seems excessive for selling eggs and frozen meat <br />products that already have to go through USDA requirements. They will have to pass this cost onto their <br />customers who may or may not want to pay the increase for their product. Some vendors are not serving <br />or preparing food, but treated as though they are. The board would like to work with the county to figure <br />out a permit that will meet the health department requirements and keep the costs down to keep vendors <br />here. <br />Public testimony closed at 10:42 a.m. <br />Rich Elliott noted that he does not like to see fees going up, but is sensitive to the health department since <br />they are doing what is being asked of them to do. Mr. Elliott recommended trying to work with farmer's <br />market clients to develop a system that was more appropriate for what they were doing, and not treat them <br />differently. Commissioner Jewell asked for clarification on the market permit and if it covered all <br />farmer's Markets in the county. Holly Myers stepped to the microphone and responded that it does. There <br />was discussion about setting the Farmer's Market permit fee at the temp food level 3 fee of $255.00 <br />temporarily. The board recommended that the health department work with the Farmer's Market Board to <br />set fees for the market, and to have this done for the next Farmer's Market that starts in May. There were <br />additional conversations for clarifications of a couple fees. <br />Commissioner Jewell noted that the 2017 Public Health fees were adjusted based on the new fee <br />methodology that includes actual county staff time, gas, etc. and not just based on random numbers. <br />