2016-06-13-minutes-public-works-study-session

Home Browse Search

• Digital copies of all hydraulic modeling (input and output) files for the 10%, 4%, 2%, 1%, "1% plus" and 0.2% annual chance events. • Digital hydraulic data consistent with the Data Capture Standards as described in the latest Technical Reference: Data Capture. • FIRM Database files as described in the FIRM Database Technical Reference, Table 2. • Metadata file complying with the latest Technical Reference: Metadata Profiles for Hydraulics. • Digital versions of draft text for inclusion in Section 5.2 Hydraulic Analyses of the FIS report. • Digital Floodway Data Tables for each flooding source studied by detailed methods that is compatible with the FIRM database. • Digital profiles of the 10%, 4%, 2%, 1%, "1% plus" and 0.2% annual chance events, representing existing conditions using the FEMA RASPLOT program or similar software (for flooding sources studied by detailed methods);). • Digital versions of all backup data used in the analysis, including high water mark data for model calibration, GIS data layers, and any additional hydraulics data collected for use in the preparation of this flood risk project. • Complete set of digital work maps to be used at the Flood Engineering Review meeting. Work maps will include all appropriate GIS layers and be PDF files depicting effective and revised flooding, cross sections, streams and roads on an aerial base map. • A Hydraulic Report summarizing the approach and results of the hydraulic analysis for each study area in Table 1.7. • A Summary Report that describes and provides the results of all automated or manual QA/QC review steps taken during the preparation of the FIRM as outlined in the approved QA/QC Plan. • Written certification that the digital data meet the minimum standards and specifications. • Where paper documentation is required by state law for professional certifications, the CTP may submit the paper in addition to a scanned version of the paper for the digital record. Please coordinate with the regional and/or state representative to verify state reporting requirements. • Explanations for unresolved messages from the CHECK -2 or CHECK -RAS program, as appropriate. • Written response to any comments resulting from the independent QA/QC review. • If data is changed following the independent QA/QC review, then updated deliverables for the Develop Hydraulic Data task must be submitted to the MIP. • Appropriate leverage information, including who paid for the data and the amount of data used by the Flood Risk Project. National FY16 Flood Risk Project MAS Template Version 1.0 Mapping Activity Statement No. (MASNo ) 15