My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Formation Criteria <br />1. Encompass only the legally assessable area, or include provisions for voluntary <br />participation by the owners of exempt property. <br />2. Encompass only the area specially benefitted by the LID project. <br />3. The total special benefit must approximately equal or exceed the total assess mentto be <br />levied. <br />Need for a Special Benefit Study <br />A special benefit analysis is recommended when: <br />1. Uncertainty exists regarding financial feasibility of the proposed project or portions <br />thereof. <br />2. Uncertainty exists pertaining to the limit of special benefit influence and, therefore, <br />location of the LID boundary_ <br />3. The proposed project includes property with irregularly shaped ownership lines or <br />significant variation in other physical characteristics such as topography, soils, drainage. <br />wetlands and amenities such as view or water frontage. <br />4. The LID boundary encompasses property with varying intensities of use or zoning <br />designations, variations in use and value created by specific locations, changing land use <br />regulations or highest and best use. <br />A special benefit analysis is not recommended when: <br />L It is acknowledged that the special benefit attributable to the project exceeds the total <br />amount of LID assessment. <br />2. Ownership lines are reasonably regular or in proportion to each other. <br />3. There is insignificant variation in intensity of use because of land use regulations, <br />topography, soils, drainage, wetlands or changes in highest and best use due to the LID <br />project. <br />4. It is not probable that the LID formation, boundary location, property assessments or <br />proportionality of individual assessments will be contested. <br />Utilize a Special Benefit Analyst to Resolve Issues <br />1. Make a p�elirninary investigation at the inception of a proposed LID project and provide <br />an opinion as to economic feasibility of the overall project and/or various components <br />thereof. <br />2. Recommend an LID boundary which encompasses all specially benefitted property and <br />provides support to withstand appeals to Superior Court. <br />Local and Road Improvement Districts Manual for Washington State Sixth Eriifion 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.