My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
10. October
>
2016-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2016-05-09-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 1:35:43 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
32188
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Again, special benefits are totaled and divided into the total LID assessment to obtain the overa!1 <br />assessmentlbenefit ratio. The special benefit attributable to each parcel is multiplied by this <br />constant ratio to arrive at recommended assessments. A significant variance ir. the assessment <br />per squarefootor perfrontfoot is sometimes noted on adjacent properties. This can resultfrom <br />the influence of factors including but not limited to existing building improvements, differences <br />in zoning or projected intensity of use, corner influence, terrain, wetlands, ratio of frontage to <br />area, or changes in access characteristics. <br />Because differences in special benefitto individual properties are measured bythe special benefit <br />analysis, the method results in a fair and equitable allocation of assessment to all parcels that is <br />in proportion to the individual special benefit. Assessments made on a formula basis (such as <br />zone and termini, per square foot or per front foot) may result in amounts that are not fair and <br />equitable between parceis within the overall LID. Formula or mathematically -based assessments <br />may be less thar, or exceed the proportionate assessments indicated by the special benefit <br />adhering to parcels as a result of the project. <br />Completion of the second assignment results in a special benefit study report that includes <br />narrative and summary tabulation sections. The narrative section explainsthe assumptions made <br />and techniques used forthe study as well as providing documentation for the conclusions shown <br />in the final assessment roll tabulation. The tabulation section consists of a summary of <br />recommended assessments to each benefitted parcel. <br />As in the formation special benefit study, recommended assessments meet the following two <br />important criteria: <br />1. Each recommended assessment is equal to or less than the special benefit adhering to <br />that particular parcel. <br />2. Each recommended assessment is reasonably proportionate to the special benefit <br />adhering to that parcel and to all other parcels due to the LID -funded project. <br />The special benefit analyst is again prepared, if requested, to make a presentation at the final <br />assessment roll hearing explaining techniques used, assumptions made, basis of special benefit <br />and resulting recommended assessmentto each parcel. The analyst responds to LID protests <br />or contradictory testimony in order to provide unbiased information to property owners and the <br />hearing authority. Testimony of the analyst/appraiser, along with the special benefit study report <br />as an exhibit, is ,made part of the record during the final assessment roll hearing. <br />Summary of LID Speciai Benefit Analysis <br />Major Phases <br />1 Recommend an LID boundary that encompasses all property specially benefitted by the <br />proposed LID project, if requested by the client. <br />2. Document economic feasibility of the project, with separate analysis of alternative project <br />improvements, if appropriate. <br />3. recommend assessments that are proportionate to the special benefit adhering to each <br />assessable parcel. <br />56 Local and Hand Improvement Districts Manual for Washington State Sixth Edition <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.