Laserfiche WebLink
benefit studies may be used by owners to attempt to remove the presumption that project <br />improvements provide a special benefit and that proposed assessments are fair and equitable <br />to each benefitted parcel. In the eventthatan owrer does rot prevail in protesting an assessment <br />at the final assessment roll, the special benefit study may be used as part of the record to support <br />appeals to Superior Court. <br />The narrative special benefit study report serves as support for informed decisions by both <br />municipalities and property owners. The reportand testimony, if requested, of the special benefit <br />analyst/appraiser provide documentation of assessment recommendations at the final <br />assessment roll hearing. <br />Special Benefit hoporiionate Assessment Studies — Phases of Analysis <br />Feasibility Analysis <br />Due to the ever-changing real estate market, it is often advisable to conduct a feasibility study as <br />an initial analysis in the LID formation process. This enables municipalities and property owners <br />to evaluate the economic feasibility of a project by comparing the probable range in special <br />benefit to the project cost or amount to be levied on assessable property. <br />If the project is economically feasible, the next phase is a formation special benefit/proportionate <br />assessment study, followed by a final special benefit study. Typically, but not always, the final <br />specia i benefit study is undertaken at or near the completion of project construction. Each of the <br />above phases is briefly discussed below. <br />A feasibility study involves a preliminary investigation of the proposed improvements and the <br />neighborhood in which they would be constructed, together with an analysis of the extent and <br />intensity of influence of the proposed project on market value. <br />Unlike the more detailed formation and final special benefit studies, the feasibility analysis does <br />not provide a recommended per parcel assessment. The scope of work is more general in nature <br />with benefitted properties segregated into classifications based on highest and best use. <br />Representative parcels within each classification are then analyzed without as opposed to with <br />the LID assumed: completed. The market value difference (special benefit), typically expressed <br />as a range, is then extrapolated over similar properties in each respective classification, arriving <br />at a total specia! benefit range that can be compared to the assessment amount. This phase of <br />the study can be very useful to the client in considering a projects feasibility and is often used <br />in decisions on whether or not to proceed with the LID. <br />Special benefit/proportionate assessment studies for municipalities may consist of two separate <br />assignments, both of which utilize mass appraisal techniques. The first assignment is an LID <br />formation study and the second is a final assessment roll study. <br />Formation Special Benefit Study <br />Typically, the first work sequence, occurring in conjunction with the preliminary investigation, <br />involves preparation of a property ownership map outlining the general extent of project <br />improvements and measurable special benefit influence on market value due to the LID proiect. <br />The ownership map is utilized in defining and documenting the extent of special benefit due to <br />the project and is part of the basis forthe boundary location recommended forthe proposed LID. <br />The work product from a prior feasibility study can also be utilized in this phase. <br />Local and Road Improvement Districts Manual for Washington State Skh EdNon 53 <br />