My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-10-28-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2019
>
11. November
>
2019-11-05 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2019-10-28-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 10:52:18 AM
Creation date
5/12/2020 10:48:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
11/5/2019
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
57663
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
nhc <br />Applied to the baseline reach average lateral migration rate of 1.6 feet/year, which was calculated by <br />comparing historic aerial photos (section 3.2), this suggests an increase in the lateral channel migration <br />rate, due to the realignment of Lick Creek, would be about 0.3 feet/year or less. Over a 50 -year period, <br />this equates to about a maximum of 14 feet of additional lateral channel movement compared to an <br />expected baseline of about 80 feet. Due to the dominance of down valley meander migration (illustrated <br />In Section 3.2) most erosion due to this process will be expected to occur within the river's meander <br />belt. Erosion will occur on both banks of the river, depending on the meander alignment, and result in <br />both gain and loss of land in the right bank floodplain. The primary effect of the increased channel <br />migration rate from the addition of flow from Lick Creek would be expected to have a slightly faster <br />cycling of channel occupation within the floodplain. However, the effect of this added flow on the <br />possible expansion of the CMZ over an engineering timeframe (decades to centuries) Is likely to be much <br />smaller. <br />REGIME WIDTH CHANGE <br />In addition to changes In channel migration rates, the impact from a small addition of flow on the regime <br />width of the channel was also evaluated. This was done by applying the concept of Rational Regime <br />Theory, as implemented In the University of British Columbia UBC Regime Model (UBCRM), developed <br />by Millar et al. (2014). Rational Regime Theory provides a useful tool for examining the key factors <br />controlling the channel planform and hydraulic geometry, as well as potential flexibility In the channel <br />form due to natural variability or human -induced changes in water and sediment supply. It Is a robust, <br />physically -based approach to predicting channel dimensions that has been validated against a large <br />empirical dataset (Eaton et al., 2004; Eaton and Church, 2007; Eaton and Millar, 2017). The UBCRM is <br />based on this approach and accounts for many more of the key controlling variables than traditional <br />empirical regime equations, while the required input data is sufficiently limited to be readily applicable. <br />The model utilizes the controlling variables specified below. <br />The model was parameterized with the following inputs: <br />• the same grainsize distribution depicted In Figure 3 (D,OF=72 mm D84=170 mm), <br />• the estimated channel forming discharge for both current and realigned conditions (choice of <br />value described later), <br />• the reach average slope of 0.008, <br />+ the default program suggested value of T* = 0.2, <br />• and bank strength (p), calibrated to reproduce the current channel width (as recommended by <br />Eatorw Personas communication 2015). <br />The 2 -rear flow was used as the channel forming discharge for the NF Teanoway River (Q,-849 ds). The <br />calibrated g value was very low (1.01), which is consistent with the observed similarity of the bed and <br />bank material. Bank strength (µ) Is quantitatively defined as the ratio of shear stress required to mobilize <br />the bank material to that required to mobilize the bed material. The calibrated value of 1.01 produced a <br />Potential impact of Erick Creek relocation on the NF Teanaway River Morphodynarnics <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.