Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 2 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Proposed Action and Alternatives <br /> PAGE 2-40 <br />The Wisconsin Public Service Commission (WPSC), an independent regulatory agency, issued a report in <br />2011 titled Underground Electric Transmission Lines (WPSC 2011). According to the report, the varying <br />circumstances of an underground line failure dictate the duration of an outage. Repair person availability <br />and skill level, as well the availability of parts, all contribute to the length of time it takes to repair an <br />underground line failure. On the average, it takes between 5 and 9 days to repair an outage on a XLPE <br />underground transmission line. Repair time for a high pressure, gas-filled GIL underground transmission <br />often takes longer (8 to 12 days). Depending on the extent of the damage, repairing a fault in a HPFF <br />system can take from 2 to 9 months. The duration of an outage and the time it takes to repair the line <br />increases with the number of splices in the system. Allowing quick and easy access to the system via <br />concrete vaults at splice locations can reduce the duration of an outage. Outages tend to be longer when a <br />splice is directly buried, as is occasionally seen with suburban and rural XLPE lines. <br />For pipe-type lines, the line must be de-energized and the pipe pressure reduced below 60 pounds per <br />square inch before any probes are put into the pipe to locate a leak. The line must be out of service for a <br />day, for some leak probes, before the tests can begin. The fluid on each side of the line failure is frozen <br />approximately 25 feet out from the failure point in order to repair a pipe-type line. The pipe would be <br />opened and the line inspected. Repairs may include a new splice or cable replacement and splicing. Upon <br />completion of the repair, the fluid in the pipe would be thawed and the line would be slowly re- <br />pressurized, tested, and put back in service. As a result, a couple of extra days are required before the line <br />can be reenergized (WPSC 2011). Emergency response time for underground transmission lines is often <br />affected because hampered by the fact most of the underground transmission material suppliers are <br />located in Europe. <br />Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) <br />As an alternative to open trenching or the use of overhead transmission lines and transition stations, <br />horizontal directional drilling (HDD) is a trenchless method of installing transmission lines and other <br />utilities where surface and near-surface features must remain undisturbed. HDD would be technically <br />feasible as an alternative construction method of the Underground Design Option instead of the use of <br />transition stations, such as the crossing of I-82 for the proposed Project. <br />HDD is a process where a conduit pipe is placed in a hole drilled along an underground arc between <br />insertion and reception pits on each end using a bore machine, which is essentially a specialized drilling <br />rig placed at a horizontal angle. A boring machine pushes and guides a drilling head connected to hollow <br />pipe into the ground at a designated angle based on site conditions. As each joint of drill pipe advances <br />into the ground through the “pilot hole”, a new one is added behind it. When the bore head and rod <br />emerge on the opposite side of the crossing, a special cutter, called a back reamer, is attached and pulled <br />back through the pilot hole. The reamer bores out the pilot hole so that the pipe can be pulled through. <br />Once the drilling is complete and the conduit is in place, the underground cable (e.g., solid dielectric <br />cable) may be fed through the conduit. <br />HDD requires extensive geotechnical study to identify soil formations at the potential bore sites of the <br />drilling area to determine appropriate design and drilling techniques. This must be conducted before <br />decisions on the pipe design or installation techniques can be made. The purpose of the investigation is <br />not only to determine if HDD is feasible, but to establish the most efficient implementation procedures. <br />The study would identify soil types, rock inclusions, areas of hardpan, soil strength and stability <br />characteristics, and potential groundwater occurrence. Based on the study, the best boring route can be <br />determined, drilling tools and procedures would be selected, and the pipe designed. The extent of the <br />geotechnical investigation depends on the pipe diameter, bore length, and the nature of the crossing. <br />Drilling fluid or drilling mud, typically a mixture of water, and bentonite (clay) or polymer, is used during <br />the drilling process to aid in stabilizing the bore hole, cooling the cutting head, removing cuttings, and