My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> PAGE 4-260 <br />Visual Impacts <br />Little of the land within one mile and none of the land within 250 feet of the centerline of Route Segment <br />1c had been previously surveyed for cultural resources. The only recorded cultural resources within one <br />mile are archaeological sites, which are unlikely to be sensitive to changes in visual setting. <br />Visual impacts are anticipated to be low because undiscovered archaeological sites, should they exist, <br />would probably not be visually sensitive and there are no recorded architectural resources. <br />Native American Concerns <br />The six resources of special concern identified by YNCRP, located near Route Segment 1b are also <br />located in the vicinity of Route Segment 1c. The resources are located 3 to 7 miles from the centerline of <br />this route segment. However, as discussed for Route Segment 1a/NNR-1 and 1b, the integrity of visual <br />setting has been compromised by extensive development in the areas. Therefore, impacts to the resources <br />from the presence of a new transmission line are expected to be low (Lally and Camuso 2011). <br />4.11.4.4 Route Segment 2a <br />Route Segment 2a is only 1.0 mile long. There have been no surveys within a mile and only one small <br />lithic scatter recorded within one mile. The terrain and environmental conditions are similar to those of <br />Route Segments 1b and 1c, although, for its entire length, this route segment roughly parallels an <br />ephemeral drainage 100 to 500 feet to the west. <br />Physical Impacts <br />Short-term and long-term ground disturbance along this route segment would total 6.0 acres. None of the <br />land within 75 feet of the centerline of Route Segment 2a has been previously surveyed for cultural <br />resources and there are no previously recorded cultural resources within 75 feet. Physical impacts are <br />anticipated to be low to moderate because archaeological site densities in nearby areas appear to be low <br />except possibly near drainages. There would be no physical impacts to architectural resources. <br />Overall, the potential for physical impacts to cultural resources is low to moderate. <br />Visual Impacts <br />Little of the land within one mile and none of the land within 250 feet of the centerline of Route Segment <br />2a had been previously surveyed for cultural resources. The only recorded cultural resource within one <br />mile is a small prehistoric archaeological site, which is unlikely to be sensitive to changes in visual <br />setting. <br />Visual impacts are anticipated to be low because undiscovered archaeological sites, should they exist, <br />would probably not be visually sensitive and there are no recorded architectural resources. <br />Native American Concerns <br />The six resources of special concern identified by YNCRP, located near Route Segments 1b and 1c are <br />also located in the vicinity of Route Segment 2a, but are located at a greater distance from this route <br />segment (Lally and Camuso 2011). Therefore, impacts are expected to be low. <br />4.11.4.5 Route Segment 2b <br />Route Segment 2b is 16.3 miles long. The terrain along this segment is more pronounced than that to the <br />east, with deeper drainages and more surface relief. While the DAHP WISAARD database does not <br />indicate extensive systematic and intensive cultural resource surveys within one mile of the centerline of <br />Route Segment 2b, at least 36 cultural resources have been recorded in the general area of the route <br />segment. Most of these are on JBLM YTC. Prehistoric archaeological sites are generally lithic scatters, <br />although there is at least one burial site and at least one talus pit. Historic sites include trash scatters and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.