Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences PAGE 4-234 greater distances, such as in the Moses Lake and Quincy (Grant County) areas and possibly in the Richland area in Benton County, or share hotel rooms. If construction activities occur at two or more locations such as proceeding simultaneously from each terminus, demand increases would be spread to a larger area of nearby supply and impacts on hotel and RV supply and demand would be substantially less. Because hotel and RV supplies experience frequent full occupancy, especially in the popular tourist months of summer, some upward pressure on nightly rates can be expected due to construction of any of the Action Alternatives; thus, this increase is mitigated by the market mechanism of pricing. However, the increased demand would be quite small proportionately compared to baseline demands, as would any resultant price increases. 4.9.6.4 Revenue and Fiscal Effects Sales and Use Taxes Sales and use taxes would be paid to the state of Washington and to the counties in which the facilities are constructed. These taxes would apply to the value of purchases of material goods for Project construction and by workers at jobs created due to the Project. Although beneficial to the receiving jurisdictions, the projected sales and use tax revenues would be very small relative to total jurisdiction revenues. Between $160,041 and $248,707 in sales and use taxes are estimated to be paid due to the Project, shown in Table 4.9-6. These estimates are based on the local and state sales and use tax rates, the value of local purchases of Project construction in Table 4.9-2 and itinerant worker spending effects shown in Table 4.9-3 and are adjusted to reflect likely locations of purchases. The estimates are conservative, however, since they assume spending is taxable at county rates and do not include spending arising due to the multiplier effects on personal income (and spending) or spending by local residents who work on the construction site. As a result of construction, Alternatives A-H would result in 32 percent more total sales and use tax revenues than the NNR Alternative - MR Subroute and 55 percent more than the NNR Alternative (Table 4.9-6). Property Taxes Transmission facilities spanning more than one county in Washington are assessed by the Washington Department of Revenue (WDOR) Utility Section. Property taxes accrue to the counties in which the assessed values are assigned. For preliminary property tax estimating, the capital costs of the facilities shown in Table 4.9-1 are used as proxies for the value of the ultimate assessment by WDOR, along with mileage of ROW in each county. Property tax rates discussed in Section 3.9.2.5 were used, with only the overall county property tax rates used. Additional property taxes would be paid to special districts in which Project facilities are located. The resulting estimates of property taxes use current rates and are for the first year of tax payments only. After the first year, assessments would change as factors such as revenue assignable by the state to the facilities and depreciation become important in the actual assessments. The estimates in Table 4.9-7 indicate a total of $209,352 to $236,718 in property taxes would be paid to the counties and the state in the first taxable year. Alternative G would result in the most property tax payments and the NNR Alternative the least (Table 4.9-7).