My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> PAGE 4-205 <br />4.8.5.8 Route Segment 3a <br />Visual Contrasts <br />Structure contrast would be weak near the existing Vantage Substation, where multiple transmission lines <br />converge. There would be minimal or no access road improvements necessary due to the existing road <br />network servicing the substation facility and transmission lines and, therefore, weak landscape contrasts. <br />Overall, weak Project contrasts would occur as a result of this route segment. <br />Scenic Quality Impacts and Development Character <br />This route segment is in a highly visually modified corridor, and the Industrial Development Character <br />(see Section 3.8.2.3) and visual influence of the Wanapum Dam and associated substation and <br />transmission infrastructure is compatible with this route segment. <br />Sensitive Viewer Impacts <br />Residences located to the south would view weak Project contrasts in the background and low impacts <br />would result. Middleground views would occur from SR-243 and Beverly-Berke Road and would also be <br />seen through the existing transmission infrastructure creating low impacts. <br />Agency Management Compliance <br />There are no BLM or state lands crossed by this route segment and the Bureau of Reclamation does not <br />have standards regarding the management of visual resources. <br />4.8.5.9 Route Segment 3b <br />Visual Contrasts <br />Structure contrast would be strong along most of this route segment except where the route segment <br />meets the Shultz-Wautoma 500 kV corridor and Columbia River crossing. From the west side of the <br />Columbia River crossing to the Vantage Substation and Route Segment 3a intersection structure contrasts <br />would be weak. Landscape contrasts would typically be weak because most of the route segment follows <br />the abandoned railroad ROW corridor that would require minimal improvements and vegetation is <br />frequently low growing and herbaceous. Where the route segment would require the removal of shrubby <br />vegetation or trees in selected areas (MP 12.9-17.0), weak or strong landscape contrast would occur. <br />Overall, Project contrasts would typically be moderate from MP 0.0 to 12.3 and be strong or strong <br />moderate from MP 12.3 to 19.3, where the route segment joins the existing Pomona-Wanapum 230 kV/ <br />Wanapum-Wind Ridge 230 kV/Schultz-Vantage 500 kV/Schultz-Wanapum 500 kV corridor and crosses <br />the Columbia River. <br />Scenic Quality Impacts and Development Character <br />Scenic quality impacts along this route segment would typically be moderate in a Class B landscape, <br />except in those areas where more visually prominent vegetation would be removed as a result of access <br />improvements. The route segment would impact scenic quality by contrasting with the dominating river <br />and lake shorelines, rocky talus slope toes, and basalt cliffs. The route segment would not traverse <br />Agricultural Development Character Areas, but would be directly adjacent to them. For a short distance, <br />the route segment would cross Residential Development Character Areas, also (MP 14.7-15.1). In those <br />areas, the route segment would not be compatible the existing landscape character. <br />Sensitive Viewer Impacts <br />Residences would view moderate to strong Project contrasts in the immediate foreground in two areas <br />along this route segment causing high impacts: the Priest Rapids residential area located on the southwest <br />side of the Priest Rapids Dam and an agricultural residential area located on the south end of Huntzinger <br />Road.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.