My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> PAGE 4-163 <br />4.6.4.15 Route Segment NNR-6o/6u <br />There are no SMAs associated with Route Segment NNR-6 and no impacts would occur. <br />4.6.4.16 Route Segment NNR-7 <br />There are no SMAs associated with Route Segment NNR-7 and no impacts would occur. <br />4.6.4.17 Route Segment NNR-8 <br />This route segment crosses the proposed expansion area of the Yakima River Cliffs and Umtanum Ridge <br />ACEC, the Huntzinger Road ACEC, and the planned Wanapum Natural Area Preserve (NAP). Moderate <br />impacts to ACEC values (as previously described) would occur in the short-term due to potential <br />relocation of plants that cannot be avoided during the construction of the Project (see Section 4.3.3 and <br />4.3.4-4). With the implementation of RDFs and the assumption that potential occurrences would be <br />spanned and avoided, Project construction, operation, and maintenance activities could cause some <br />change or stress to plant populations, but will not contribute a trend toward a change in agency (BLM or <br />state) listing status. Therefore, short-term effects on these values may occur to established or proposed <br />ACECs and the Wanapum NAP, causing moderate or low impacts, respectively. <br />4.6.4.18 Route Segment MR-1 <br />There are no SMAs associated with Route Segment Manastash Ridge (MR) 1 and no impacts would <br />occur. <br />4.6.5 Mitigation Measures <br />The RDFs described in Chapter 2 are designed to reduce effects from the proposed Project; therefore, no <br />additional mitigation would be required. <br />4.6.6 Residual Impacts <br />Residual impacts are identical to the impacts described in Sections 4.6.4 because no additional mitigation <br />measures are proposed for SMAs. <br />4.6.7 Impact Summary by Alternative <br />4.6.7.1 No Action Alternative <br />Under the No Action Alternative, the proposed Project would not be constructed or operated. No Project- <br />related impacts to SMAs would occur. <br />4.6.7.2 Action Alternatives <br />Low impacts would occur for 0.2 mile for Alternatives F and H, for 12.8 miles for Alternatives A and D, <br />and for 12.6 miles of Alternatives B and C. Moderate impacts would also occur along 1.8 miles of <br />Alternatives B, C, E, and G. Impacts would be identical for both NNR Alternative Design Options and the <br />MR Subroute, with low impacts occurring for 6.9 miles and moderate impacts for 3.1 miles.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.