Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> <br /> PAGE 4-110 <br />The presence of transmission line structures, which could provide additional perch and/or nesting sites for <br />avian predators, could negatively impact nearby prey species such as small mammals and avian species, <br />particularly when the new structures are built in an area where perching opportunities currently do not <br />exist (i.e., greater than 0.25 mile from existing structures or trees). Construction of Route Segment <br />NNR-5 would require an estimated 16 new structures in a landscape dominated by low growing grasses <br />and shrubs. An estimated 10 new structures would be located greater than 0.25 mile from an existing <br />transmission line (Table 4.3-5). <br />Within one mile of Route Segment NNR-5, potentially suitable habitat is present for 35 special status <br />wildlife species that are possible, likely, or known to occur (Tables 3.3-2, 3.3-3, and 3.3-7). Potential <br />impacts and RDFs to address them are discussed in Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2. Species or wildlife <br />resources that have been documented at specific locations within one mile of Route Segment NNR-5 <br />include a burrowing owl nesting site. <br />A historic burrowing owl nesting site (last documented occupancy prior to 2000) occurs approximately <br />0.7 mile from Route Segment NNR-5. While this particular nest is not likely to have persisted to the <br />present, it demonstrates potential for burrowing owls to nest within one mile of Route Segment NNR-5. <br />Potential impacts would occur from disturbance during construction activities or from injury or mortality <br />from vehicle strikes or interactions with other equipment used during construction, including mechanical <br />disturbance or crushing of burrows. If an occupied burrowing owl nesting site is found within 0.25 mile <br />of the proposed route, a seasonal restriction on construction would be enacted from March to August, <br />within the 0.25-mile buffer. Additional RDFs to reduce impact on burrowing owls are described in <br />Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2. Impact levels to burrowing owl are expected to be moderate for 0.6 mile. <br />All habitat disturbance associated with Route Segment NNR-5 would be located within the Regularly <br />Occupied Habitat MU for Sage-Grouse. Construction activities would disturb less than one percent of <br />Regularly Occupied Habitat (Table 4.3-7). Anticipated ground disturbance includes 9.1 acres of suitable <br />Sage-Grouse habitat (Table 4.3-8). With the implementation of RDFs (refer to Sections 4.3.3.1 and <br />4.3.3.2), habitat impact levels would be low for 0.1 mile and moderate for 1.7 miles. <br />Existing perching, roosting and nesting sites for avian predators are available along Route Segment NNR- <br />5 from buildings, trees, and fences associated with developed areas and existing distribution and 230 kV <br />H-frame transmission lines. Construction of Route Segment NNR-5 would require an estimated 16 new <br />structures; approximately 10 (63 percent) would be located greater than 0.25 mile from an existing <br />transmission line (Table 4.3-5). <br />The estimated Sage-Grouse population range does not overlap Route Segment NNR-5 ROW corridor <br />(Figure 3.3-4). No active leks are known to occur within four miles of Route Segment NNR-5 (Table 4.3- <br />6). With the implementation of RDFs (Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2), impacts to lekking Sage-Grouse <br />associated with the construction of Route Segment NNR-5 is anticipated to be low for the entire length of <br />the route segment (1.8 miles). <br />4.3.4.15 Route Segment NNR-6o/NNR-6u <br />Route Segment NNR-6 is being considered as either an underground segment (NNR-6u) or as an <br />overhead segment (NNR-6o). Undergrounding would create a larger area of ground disturbance than an <br />overhead line would, because the overhead line would cause relatively little ground disturbance along the <br />spanned areas between structures and the underground portion would require a continuous trench and a <br />permanent access road. The Overhead Design Option would result in approximately 27.3 acres of long- <br />term and 3.3 acres of short-term disturbance, while the Underground Design Option would cause <br />approximately 50.9 acres of long-term disturbance and 6.6 acres of short-term disturbance resulting in <br />nearly two times as much ground disturbance as the Overhead Design Option. For Route Segment