My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> <br /> PAGE 4-101 <br />species, particularly when the new structures are built in an area where perching opportunities currently <br />do not exist (i.e., greater than 0.25 mile from existing structures or trees). Construction of Route Segment <br />3c would require an estimated 186 structures, of which 119 structures would be located greater than 0.25 <br />mile from an existing transmission line (Table 4.3-5). <br />Within 1.0 mile of Route Segment 3c, potentially suitable habitat is present for 66 special status wildlife <br />species that are possible, likely, or known to occur (Tables 3.3-2, 3.3-3, and 3.3-7). Potential impacts and <br />RDFs to address them are discussed in Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2. Species or wildlife resources that <br />have been documented at specific locations within 1.0 mile of Route Segment 3c include critical habitat <br />for bull trout, Chinook salmon, and steelhead; occurrences of striped whipsnake, night snake, sagebrush <br />lizard, side-blotched lizard, and black-tailed jackrabbit; and regular concentrations of chukar, mule deer, <br />waterfowl, and common loons. Basalt cliffs and bluffs provide nesting substrates for raptors and several <br />nests of golden eagles, peregrine falcons, and prairie falcons have been documented. <br />The Hanford Reach supports the larger of the only two remaining healthy naturally spawning fall <br />Chinook salmon populations in the Columbia River System (Nugent et al. 2002). Route Segment 3c <br />parallels the Hanford Reach for approximately four miles. This route segment parallels and crosses the <br />Columbia River at Vernita Bar. Gravel bars are critical to fall Chinook salmon spawning (Nugent et al. <br />2002). No structure or road construction work would occur directly within the Columbia River. For the <br />Columbia River crossing the structures would be approximately 200 foot tall lattice steel structures for the <br />up to 2,800 foot crossing. Impacts to Chinook salmon from the construction of Route Segment 3c could <br />include increased erosion, sedimentation and elevated turbidity. The potential for impacts would be <br />minimized by implementing RDFs that apply and maintain standard erosion and sediment control <br />methods. Specific erosion and sediment control measures and locations would be specified in the SWPPP. <br />These may include straw wattles, straw bale barriers, and silt fencing which would be placed at <br />construction boundaries. The implementation of RDFs is anticipated to be effective at minimizing <br />impacts. Impact levels are expected to be low for four miles, with no identifiable impacts for the <br />remainder of the route segment. <br />Critical habitats for bull trout, the Columbia River Chinook salmon ESU, and the Upper Columbia River <br />steelhead DPS occur within 1.0 mile of Route Segment 3c in the Columbia River. Tributaries of the <br />Columbia River in and near the Project area are not part of the Upper Columbia River Spring Run <br />Chinook salmon ESU; they are part of the Mid-Columbia River Spring Run Chinook salmon ESU which <br />is not listed under the ESA (NOAA 2013). Aside from the Columbia River, it is unlikely that spawning <br />occurs in streams within the Project area. Bull trout and Chinook salmon are not known to spawn within <br />streams within the Project area because the streams are too small and not cold enough over a long enough <br />time period to provide suitable spawning and rearing habitat; however, bull trout could use streams for <br />short periods for foraging (AECOM Environmental 2010). No structure or road construction work would <br />occur directly within the Columbia River. Erosion would be minimized by applying and maintaining <br />standard erosion and sediment control methods. The implementation of RDFs is anticipated to be <br />effective at minimizing impacts to all three species. No identifiable impacts to the three species or their <br />habitats are anticipated to occur through construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed <br />Project. <br />Striped whipsnake, night snake, and sagebrush lizard have been documented within one mile of Route <br />Segment 3c. An area north of Vantage Substation with rock outcrops and shallow soils is considered an <br />overwintering area for striped whipsnakes and side-blotched lizards occur there as well. Striped <br />whipsnakes have been documented in several other locations along Route Segment 3c. Striped whipsnake <br />is rare and localized in Washington. According to WDFW, occupied habitat extends from Highway 26, <br />located north of Vantage Substation, south to Lower Crab Creek. Potential impacts to these four species <br />include direct habitat loss, indirect habitat loss or degradation through spread of invasive weeds or change
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.