My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> <br /> PAGE 4-40 <br />sagebrush/perennial grassland and 12.8 acres of annual grassland/noxious weeds. Approximately 18.6 <br />acres of vegetation would be temporarily disturbed. General vegetation impacts are similar to those <br />described above for Route Segment 1a/NNR-1. Disturbance would be minimized by RDFs described <br />above that are designed to reduce impacts to vegetation resources. RDFs include using existing roads to <br />access structure sites, minimizing blading and disturbance to plant communities, revegetating following <br />construction, and implementing a Noxious Weed and Invasive Plant Management Plan. Refer to Section <br />2.3 - Required Design Features Common to Action Alternatives for a complete list and description of <br />RDFs. <br />Impacts for Route Segment MR-1 are anticipated to be: no identifiable for 2.6 miles (disturbance <br />occurring in developed or already disturbed areas), low for 4.9 miles, and moderate for 4.4 miles. <br />Special Status Species and Priority Ecosystem <br />No special status species are known to occur along Route Segment MR-1 (Table 4.2-5). WNHP data <br />indicate snowball cactus occurs within one mile of Route Segment MR-1. WNHP data also indicate that <br />Route Segment MR-1 intersects one WNHP Priority Ecosystem, big sagebrush-bluebunch wheatgrass, for <br />approximately 0.4 mile. Impacts to this priority ecosystem would occur through disturbance and <br />vegetation removal associated with construction. Impacts would be reduced by: closing access roads <br />where not needed; implementing noxious weed control; and minimizing blading and disturbance to plant <br />communities. Due to route adjustments made following the special status plant surveys, approximately <br />0.4 percent (0.5 acre) of federal and state lands along Route Segment MR-1 were surveyed for special <br />status plants (Table 3.2-3). With Route Segment MR-1, long-term disturbance to special status species <br />potential habitat would occur to 12.5 acres of suitable, 12.8 acres of marginal, and 8.6 acres of unsuitable <br />habitat. RDFs described above for Route Segment 1a/NNR-1 and Impacts Common for All Route <br />Segments (Section 4.2.3) would be implemented during construction and maintenance of Route Segment <br />MR-1 to minimize impacts to special status plants. <br />With the implementation of RDFs, impacts to special status plant species, potential suitable habitat and <br />priority ecosystems are anticipated to include 2.5 miles of no identifiable, 4.9 miles of low impacts, and <br />4.5 miles of moderate impacts. <br />4.2.5 Mitigation Measures and Residual Impacts <br />The RDFs and environmental protection measures described in Section 2.3 (Required Design Features <br />Common to Action Alternatives) would be incorporated into the Project design and would be <br />implemented during construction and operation of the proposed Project. These measures are designed to <br />avoid or minimize environmental impacts from Project construction, operation, and maintenance <br />activities and are items that Pacific Power has committed to implement as part of the Project <br />development. If desired biological objectives are not achieved for vegetation with the existing RDFs, <br />additional mitigation measures may be implemented. Additionally, a Framework for Development of a <br />Greater Sage-Grouse Compensatory Mitigation Plan (Framework) was developed to address the residual <br />impacts (i.e., the unavoidable impacts) to the Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; Sage- <br />Grouse) which may result from the construction maintenance, and operation of the proposed Project. The <br />Framework is intended to facilitate Pacific Power’s development of a Greater Sage-Grouse Compensatory <br />Mitigation Plan (CMP). With the development and implementation of the CMP, Pacific Power will be <br />taking the necessary steps to compensate for the Project’s residual impacts and to achieve net <br />conservation gain for the species and its habitat. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.