Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 3 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Affected Environment <br /> PAGE 3-185 <br />3.8 VISUAL RESOURCES <br />As was done in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and Supplemental Draft <br />Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS), this section describes the existing conditions (affected <br />environment) and considers issues related to visual resources along all Action Alternatives presented in <br />the DEIS and SDEIS, including those raised during scoping. This Final Environmental Impact Statement <br />(FEIS) section consolidates and builds on the information presented in the January 2013 DEIS as well as <br />the January 2015 SDEIS and includes references to those documents throughout the text where <br />appropriate. This FEIS identifies the New Northern Route (NNR) Alternative – Overhead Design Option <br />as the Environmentally Preferred Alternative and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has <br />selected the NNR Alternative – Overhead Design Option as the Agency Preferred Alternative. <br />This section documents existing visual resources in the Project study area. Visual resources were <br />inventoried and characterized in a six-mile wide Project study area (three miles on either side of the route <br />segment centerlines). <br />3.8.1 Data Sources <br />The visual resource inventory consisted of a scenic quality and existing development character evaluation, <br />a viewer sensitivity analysis, and an inventory of the regulatory framework for jurisdictions crossed by <br />the Project Action Alternatives. Site reconnaissance occurred during May 2011 and June 2013 for the <br />purposes of evaluating and confirming scenic quality and development character, visibility, and visual <br />sensitivity analysis and identifying Inventory Observation Points (IOPs) and Key Observation Points <br />(KOPs). <br />Data sources included secondary sources from planning documents, online resources, U.S. Geological <br />Survey (USGS) and aerial mapping, agency sources and studies conducted by the BLM and the <br />Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A 2010 Visual Resources Inventory (VRI) <br />study developed for the BLM Spokane District as part of the planning effort in support of the BLM <br />Eastern Washington Resource Management Plan (RMP) update was utilized for this study. This inventory <br />analyzed portions of Eastern Washington where BLM-managed land was present and established baseline <br />visual resource values. Data obtained from the study included Scenic Quality Rating Units (SQRUs), <br />Sensitivity Level Rating Units, Distance Zones, and other data used in the development of the planning <br />area VRI Classes. <br />The data incorporated into this study from the BLM VRI was limited to Scenic Quality Classes (A, B, and <br />C) and sensitivity levels. Scenic quality and sensitivity levels were incorporated and expanded upon in <br />areas that were not inventoried in the 2010 BLM VRI. <br />3.8.2 Current Conditions and Trends, Regional Overview <br />3.8.2.1 Overview of Study Methodology and Analysis Area <br />The study approach follows the procedures identified in the BLM’s Visual Resource Management (VRM) <br />system as detailed in the Inventory Manual H8410-1 (BLM 1986a), Management Manual 8400 and <br />Contrast Rating Manual 8431-1 (for impact assessment) (BLM 1986b), with modifications appropriate to <br />the proposed Project and lands not under the jurisdiction of the BLM. These modifications allow a <br />consistent and equal level of analysis across all Action Alternatives for comparative purposes while <br />following the requirements of the VRM and BLM policy. <br />The analysis considered issues raised during the public scoping process. Scoping comments included <br />general concerns for scenic views and visual quality impacts, visual impacts on tourism, views from