My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 3 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Affected Environment <br /> PAGE 3-179 <br />For the proposed Project, WSDOT is responsible for processing Pacific Power’s utility permit or <br />franchise application(s) to cross the I-82 and SR-243. I-82 is potentially crossed in three locations and <br />SR 243 is crossed in two locations. WSDOT would also be responsible for coordinating FHWA’s review <br />and concurrence of a permanent access break for a utility installation across I-82, providing an easement <br />through WSDOT property, and providing any additional documentation for compliance with National <br />Environmental Policy Act, State Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the National <br />Historic Preservation Act. <br />Section 4(f) Applicability <br />Section 4(f) refers to the original section within the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 which <br />established the requirement for consideration of park and recreational lands, wildlife and waterfowl <br />refuges, and historic sites in transportation project development. In a letter to the BLM (dated August 30, <br />2013), the FHWA has determined that Section 4(f) does not apply to the Project because it is not a <br />transportation project as defined by case law and because the FHWA is not providing any funding for the <br />Project (FHWA 2013). <br />WSDOT <br />State roads in the Project study area are managed by the South-Central and North-Central WSDOT <br />regions. Management considerations and decisions made by WSDOT are based on a multi-year plan, <br />which is updated every year by WSDOT and approved by the FHWA. This plan, the Statewide <br />Transportation Improvement Program (STIP; WSDOT 2015) is for the years 2015-2018. The WSDOT <br />STIP provides planning guidance, necessity, and cost to programs such as road improvements, new road <br />projects, and future transportation-related studies. <br />STIP roadway improvement projects in the Project study area include: <br />• Minor improvements totaling approximately $73,000 at the SR 26/243 intersection. These <br />improvements include but are not limited to a Vehicle Speed Display, striping changes, and <br />improved sight distance. <br />• Chip sealing on SR-24 starting two miles east of Badger Lane to 7.4 miles west of SR-241. <br />There are no other projects within the STIP within Grant, Kittitas, and Yakima Counties <br />which occur in the Project study area. <br />All state highways are identified as limited access or managed access. Limited Access Highways are <br />highways in which the abutting property owner’s right of access to the state highway has been purchased, <br />with the result being that the abutting property owner may or, in most cases, may not have access to the <br />state highway. Limited access highways are further defined as Full, Partial, or Modified limited access <br />control. <br />Full limited access control highways, the most restrictive, allow no direct private property access <br />at all; for example, the interstate system, in which public access is only allowed at interchanges. <br />I-82 is considered a full limited access highway. <br />Partial limited access control highways may allow access, but only in specified locations and only <br />for the specified use, such as single family residential or farm use, as defined in the Limited <br />Access Plans. Partial limited access control highways allow no commercial usage of the access, <br />such as retail or industrial. <br />Modified limited access control, the least restrictive of the three, allows residential and <br />commercial usage, but only in the specified locations and only for the specified uses as defined in <br />the Limited Access Plans.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.