Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 1 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Purpose and Need <br /> PAGE 1-1 <br />CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND NEED <br />1.1 INTRODUCTION <br />In October 2008, Pacific Power (Applicant) filed separate right-of-way (ROW) applications, Standard <br />Form 299 Application for Transportation and Utility Systems and Facilities on Federal Lands (SF-299), <br />with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Department of the Army (Army) Joint Base <br />Lewis-McChord Yakima Training Center (JBLM YTC) to request grants of ROW across federal lands for <br />a transmission line project from Pacific Power’s Pomona Heights Substation to the Bonneville Power <br />Administration (BPA) Vantage Substation. Upon reviewing the scope of the proposed Project and the <br />ROW applications, the BLM and JBLM YTC determined that the proposed Project constituted a major <br />federal action and would require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in <br />accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The EIS discloses potential Project- <br />related impacts pursuant to the requirements of NEPA as amended (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] §§ <br />4321, et seq.) and subsequent regulations issued by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) <br />implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500 through 1508). The EIS was prepared <br />in conformance with the BLM NEPA Handbook (BLM Handbook H-1790-1) and the U.S. Department of <br />the Interior’s Manual on NEPA (516 DM 1-7), which provides instructions for compliance with the CEQ <br />regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA. <br />Pacific Power proposes to construct, operate and maintain a new 230 kilovolt (kV) transmission line from <br />Pacific Power’s Pomona Heights substation located just east of Selah, Washington in Yakima County to <br />the BPA Vantage Substation located just east of the Wanapum Dam in Grant County, Washington. Figure <br />1-1 shows the location of the proposed Vantage to Pomona Heights 230 kV Transmission Line Project <br />(Project) within the State of Washington and Figure 1-2 shows the Project area and the location of the <br />Pomona Heights and Vantage Substations. <br />This Chapter provides the context for the Final EIS (FEIS) by describing: the EIS process; the proposed <br />Project; background information; lead and Cooperating Agencies; the Washington State Environmental <br />Policy Act (SEPA); decisions to be made; and a summary of issues and concerns described and analyzed <br />in the subsequent EIS chapters. <br />1.1.1 EIS Process <br />The Draft EIS (DEIS) for the Project, published in January 2013, analyzed eight Action Alternatives, with <br />Alternative D being selected as the Agency Preferred Alternative. Public meetings were held in Selah and <br />Desert Aire in February 2013 to provide the public an opportunity to give their input on the DEIS and the <br />Agency Preferred Alternative. During the public comment period, the BLM received letters and e-mails <br />containing more than 250 comments. <br />As a result of the comments received at the meetings and submitted in writing during the DEIS comment <br />period, the BLM, Pacific Power and the JBLM YTC met and identified a new route that is located largely <br />on JBLM YTC land. This new route is similar to a northern route also located largely on JBLM YTC land <br />that was eliminated from consideration because of the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) <br />line separation requirements in place at the time the alternative was being considered. Previously, the <br />separation distance required the placement of the line in areas that would create conflicts with JBLM <br />YTC’s aerial operations and training. Around the time of publication of the DEIS, these separation <br />requirements were revised by the electrical regulating authorities, WECC and the North American <br />Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), and now would allow a much closer distance between existing <br />lines and the proposed Project which would minimize impacts to JBLM YTC training operations thus <br />allowing the New Northern Route (NNR) Alternative to be reconsidered. The WECC regional criterion