Laserfiche WebLink
CAP ITAL FACll.,lTIES PLAN <br />Introduction <br />The Growth Management Act [RCW 36.70A.070 (3)) states that the CapitaJ Facilities Plan <br />Element of the comprehensive plan must consist of an inventory of existing capital facilities; <br />show the locations and capacities; forecast of future needs; proposed locations and capacities; six <br />year plan to finance capital facilities with projected funding sources; and reassessment of the <br />Land Use Element to ensure that these elements are coordinated and consistent <br />Each of these systems have been inventoried by type, level of servi~ and cost by year in tbe <br />Six-Year Capital Faalities Plan. This plan differs from past Capital Improvement Plans since it <br />identifies and establishes level of service standards for the city's capital facilities. This <br />measurement will be a component of the city's concurrency management system . A level of <br />service standard or LOS is a measurement of service to the public. It can be either a technicaJ <br />equation or an aesthetic rule of thwnb which guides capital expenditures. <br />Concurrency ensures that the prQvi$ion of urban public services will be present or funding is in <br />place for capital facilities at the time of development completion or within six years. This entire <br />plan is tied to specific funding to assure that this plan is neither a "wish list" nor a "think for <br />today" plan on capital expenditures. In total, a Capital Facilities Plan is a good management <br />technique to assure Jong range fiscal planning, <br />lsSllel and Concerns <br />Capital Project Gu.idellnes and Criteria <br />The City of Cle Elum has traditionally been funded by real estate taxes. sales tax revenue, and <br />services fees for the utilities provided by fbc city. ln addition .. the city has made a comrnitmeot <br />to conserve funds when possible to assist in the offset of costs for capital expenditure by <br />increasing service fees. This approach enables the city to spread costs in the long tenn for <br />anticipated public service improvements. <br />The city d.efines a capital expenditure as greater than $7,500.00 for an item with a life span of <br />more than five years. This defi_nition includes fleet replacement, street improvements, and <br />structural improvements while not encompassing purchases such as computers, office supplies, <br />or small equipment as capital expenditures under growth management. <br />Level of Service St.andards <br />Each section of the Capita) FaciJities PJan will establish a Level of Service. A Level of Service <br />is the standard by which a decision to expend capital will depend. For example: <br />2