My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ResolutiontoapproveTO16KPFF
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
10. October
>
2018-10-02 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
ResolutiontoapproveTO16KPFF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2018 12:13:04 PM
Creation date
9/27/2018 12:12:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/2/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
p
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing Chair's Signature on KPFF Task Order No.16 for the Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement
Order
16
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
48177
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
", HZTTITAS COUNTY <br />DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />K1171TASCOUNII <br />WSE will develop a simple HEC -RAS model of Big Boulder Creek in the vicinity of the bridge <br />crossing using topographic base map. The model will not be calibrated because observed <br />discharge/highwater marks are not available. Instead, WSE will use engineering judgment to <br />select and adjust model parameters. The model will be used to help size the bridge waterway, to <br />provide data required to evaluate lateral erosion and scour potential, and to develop <br />countermeasures. <br />TASK 4.60 — Channel Stability and Scour Assessment <br />WSE will determine if lateral erosion, local scour, ice, or debris flows pose a threat to the <br />proposed crossing. If they do, WSE will work with KPFF to address these hazards in the design. <br />Assumptions: <br />• These hazards will be addressed through modifications the structure itself (e.g. deeper <br />foundations, longer bridge, etc.) and not through design and installation of external <br />countermeasures (e.g. riprap). If countermeasures are required, the optional task at the <br />end of this scope will be completed. <br />TASK 4.70 — WDFW and Permit Coordination <br />It is anticipated that WDFW personnel have an idea of the length of crossing they would like to <br />see at the site. WSE will work with WDFW personnel, the County, and Jacobs (the company <br />that will acquire the project permits) to collectively arrive at a bridge length that is acceptable to <br />all parties. An allowance is provided for WSE's lead engineer to participate in one meeting with <br />WDFW personnel in Ellensburg. <br />Assumptions: <br />• A reasonable bridge length will be agreed to that the County can afford to build. <br />TASK 4.80 — Hydraulic Design Report <br />WSE will prepare a hydraulic design report to summarize and document the results of the <br />investigation. It will include the recommended NBIS Scour Code rating for the new structure, a <br />code that the County will need for their records. <br />Assumptions: <br />• A draft of the report will be provided to the County and KPFF for review. Upon receipt <br />of comments, WSE will refine the report and submit a final version as a PDF. <br />TASK 4.90 — Meetings and Administration <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.