Laserfiche WebLink
7 This site is too close to residential areas <br />8 Would be nice for county to get income stream but lousy location. To much <br />residential traffic. Roads not set up for heavy trucks. Kids all over the place. <br />Lousy I-90 access. Would be my 3rd choice. <br />9 Not crazy about this site. Proximity to neighborhoods and increasing traffic <br />would push me away from this site. Over time the lease costs will inflate and the <br />cost over time may be more than a purchase. My least favorite site by far. <br />11 This is too close to housing developments and will have a negative impact on <br />residents. <br />12 I would be pissed if I lived on Airport Rd. and you built a transfer station here. The <br />increase in traffic alone would be terrible and the smell being blown by the <br />Ellensburg wind unimaginable. <br />14 While within the irrigated portion of the valley, this location poses the least <br />issues relative to surface water control/flooding of the currently proposed sites. <br />The vicinity of the airport industrial park is also less likely to be built up into <br />residential areas. <br />15 Far and away, the WORST option: - Roads will need a lot of improvement to <br />handle the traffic - A LOT of customer traffic will go through residential areas. - <br />Residential development is trending in that direction - negative impact on <br />property values Side note: I believe the shotgun range relocation was struck <br />down largely by extremely vocal resident objections - the County will face similar <br />assaults with a transfer station. The County ownership factor is a financial <br />convenience, nothing more. <br />17 We like this site the best because it appears the cost of land acquisition or rental <br />may be lower, and water concerns (surface water, groundwater and floodplain) <br />seem much less than the other two sites. Our one concern with this site would <br />be future population growth, as it seems that Ellensburg is growing to the north <br />faster than in other directions. Traffic routing may also be more of an issue. <br />thanks for your great web site to help keep us informed. <br />18 This site is not compatible with airport operations. It would present a serious <br />hazard to flight operations as well as other airport activities. The attraction of <br />birds alone is a disqualifying factor. <br />19 a lousy site - driving through town and residential area to access <br />ResponseID Response <br />7