My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
09. September
>
2018-09-04 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 1:29:17 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 1:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/4/2018
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Public Hearing to Consider the Purchase of Real Estate Commonly Known as Parcel 611033, US 97/Old Hwy 10 Site, Ellensburg, WA.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
47527
Type
Hold Public Hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ResponseID Response <br />1 I initially thought the airport would be a good location but using the criteria the <br />location proposed would not be the best one. Locating that close to the FBO <br />would not be desirable. Heavy truck traffic both transit and local pickup would <br />expose a lot of residential housing areas to high volumes they presently don't <br />have. <br />2 Great site close to main population center. Potential layout looks like need <br />works couldn't storm water be used at compost facility if so pond is far away? <br />This cold also bring in business to the area. Do not like the cost of the lease and <br />ending up with nothing at the end would county consider selling? <br />3 Potentially too expensive with flood issues. The smell and truck traffic may deter <br />all the westsiders from buying these homes though, which would increase <br />affordable houses for this community. <br />4 This site is closest to residential areas but furthest from the freeway access. It is <br />also farthest from areas used to heavy trucks. I think this site could have a <br />negative impact on local residents and future residential development. The <br />acquisition cost seems the most reasonable. But I fear it would cost more in the <br />long run. <br />5 Without seeing your proposed sites I considered the airport area as the best <br />location. I do believe there are better areas of the airport property more suited <br />for the project. $82,000/yr rent is idiotic. If the price is set by the BOCC by <br />resolution then a new resolution should be considered to change the rental rate <br />for this project, or sell/transfer the property from Public Works to Solid Waste <br />Department The site is already zoned light industrial so the site fits here even if <br />the surrounding residents don't want it. The County has been pushing for new <br />industrial activity in the area for years if they are successful in the future the <br />surrounding landowners may not be happy with that development either. Mercer <br />Creek is adjacent to the project area. This creek experienced flooding this spring <br />and has flooded several times over the last few years. I understand you will <br />building up the project site but do you really want to deal with the potential for <br />flooding or its effects at the new site? <br />6 Doesn't seem like the best location from a variety of perspectives - too close to <br />neighborhoods, aircraft and birds, etc. <br />3. What are your thoughts on the Airport site? <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.