Grant - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

a. This project did not require a consistency determination under the Coastal Zone Management Act from State Department of Ecology. This project did not require a 404 permit since scope of work did not include any practices that would impact aquatics by Discharging, dredging, or placing fill within waters of the US. Includes navigable waters, wetlands, lakes, rivers, streams, and tributaries . This project also did not require recorded deeds at any time due to the parameters of the scope of work. 6 . Documentation or report that all environmental and historical preservation conditions of the grant award were compiled with as described in the Grant Agreement. May be a narrative explaining how each EHP condition was met in accordance with all required permits and applicable building codes as modified or protected by the approved project. A blanket certification will not fulfill this requirement. a. The target communities of this project area where defined in the Historical Assessment process, and a FONSI was determined. The items identified in the Kittitas County Wildfire Fuels Reduction Project Final Environmental Assessment did not impact the project since all projects were located within each project boundary. A potential impact of Hidden Valley had one structure located in the project boundary, however, the nearest project occurred approximately three miles from the noted location (geodesic distance). The Archeological resources defined in the Assessment did not apply to the projects defined since projects did not intersect Forest Practices Application and many project areas remained near developed properties (Hidden Valley Rd and Hidden Valley Terrace Rd). Although potential cultural resources sites were found within the Pine Loch Sun development, on-site projects did not show any characteristics since the lots were average 1 acre or less, and remained close to existing structures that were constructed in the mid to late 20th century. Sky Meadows had no significant cultural resource inventories, nor was any found during project vegetation removal implementation. No structure alteration or impacts to existing structures were made that would trigger any building permit or review of any kind. All project implementation occured above ground with minimal disturbance around perimeters of structures on the landscape and no permit review was required from state or local jurisdictions. No trees were removed of (8) inches in diameter at breast height or greater were removed within one hundred (100) feet of water bodies with known presence of Endangered Species Act -listed fish species including Cle ELum Lake, Teanaway River and Swauk Creek, concurrent with item 0 of Scope of Work in E15-243 Kittitas County Wildfire Mitigation Fuels Reduction Project. Also, listed in the Scope of Work in E15-243 Scope of Work, item n, no vegetation management activities were allowed within (5) feet of a streams Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)I and within fifteen (15) feet of the