My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-78 <br />“children at play” or speeds could be reduced by “traffic calming” features introduced into the street <br />design. <br />Mitigation for the maintenance needs and costs <br />Maintenance needs and costs can be most influenced by the construction standards for new facilities. In <br />general, the higher the standards for subsurface, drainage, and road surface, the more durable they are, <br />and the less they are subject to failure, including reduced life-cycle maintenance costs. Effective <br />maintenance requires preventative measures to avoid failure. This includes controlling the action of <br />water, which can erode ditches, roads, and repairs to the road surface. <br />Mitigation of road maintenance costs in the development would be most affected by the standards to <br />which the roads are built and the quality of ongoing maintenance. The county controls the <br />implementation of initial standards and the homeowner association would control ongoing maintenance. <br />The extent to which homeowners choose to assess themselves for the cost of preventative maintenance is <br />the largest determinant of future road quality and the lifecycle cost of maintaining road serviceability. <br />Mitigation of Kittitas County costs of maintaining Sparks Road is largely related to whether an increase <br />in traffic volumes of the magnitude of the project would have an identifiable impact on road surface <br />maintenance needs or costs. In the case of mountain roads, frost heave, and other sources of damage and <br />wear is likely to be as significant as additional traffic. Snow removal by the county is related primarily to <br />the amount of snowfall and is not directly affected by the number of residences served. The cost of <br />maintenance would increase, but may be offset by increased revenues to the County road fund, which is <br />the additional tax base provided by new residences. <br />Maintenance costs of gravel roads such as Country Road and Pit Lane are more directly affected by traffic <br />volumes that lead to deterioration of the road surface and summer dust. Upgrading the road to a paved <br />surface would increase survivability and reduce dust but may increase maintenance costs in the future due <br />to the need for periodic resurfacing or “chip seals.” The additional costs associated with traffic from the <br />proposal could be mitigated by requiring that project residents contribute to maintenance costs. <br />21 What are the likely cumulative impacts on surface transportation with development of <br />nearby land? <br />Cumulative impacts account for potential development in nearby areas that are not related to the proposed <br />project. Analysis of the cumulative impacts assumes that the surrounding areas in Easton would be <br />developed under its existing zoning or that approval of the project would provide the precedent for <br />development of other land under PUD density. The following options were analyzed: <br /> 226-Lot Subdivision with Rural Density Development – This scenario includes development of the <br />lower bench area of the proposed project as a subdivision plus development occurring in the <br />surrounding areas under the existing zoning.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.