My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-75 <br />Development of the project could result in a loss of areas that are informally used by ATVs and <br />snowmobiles such as the BPA transmission line easement. Loss of these informal areas would likely <br />result in more use of formal and designated areas and routes for ATV and snowmobile usage, as well as <br />displacement of informal use to adjacent National Forest and other public lands. <br />County road standards for rural areas do not require sidewalks; however, sidewalks or trails constructed <br />on the outside banks of the roadside ditch could be developed to enhance pedestrian safety. Alternatively, <br />an off-road system of trails could be developed that may better serve both pedestrians and off-road <br />vehicles by separating them from conflict with vehicular traffic. <br />18 How would future maintenance responsibilities and costs change? <br />Without the project, maintenance responsibilities and costs would generally be similar as they are today. <br />Railroad Street and Sparks Road would continue to be maintained by Kittitas County and costs would be <br />paid by the County road fund. All other roads would be privately maintained. However, if substantial <br />increases in traffic occur from the development, resurfacing to fill pot holes and dust suppression <br />treatments along Country Drive and Pit Way could become more frequent and costs could <br />increase slightly. <br />Kittitas County maintenance of paved roads such as Railroad Street and Sparks Road are partially related <br />to traffic volumes but also are affected by winter conditions, particularly frost heaving that degrades the <br />road subsurface and surface. Additional traffic volumes would not necessarily result in a proportional <br />increase in maintenance needs but would have some effect. <br />Maintenance of gravel roads is directly affected by traffic volumes that tend to combine with weather <br />conditions to increase road surface failures resulting in increased pot holes. Additional traffic also <br />increases the dust generated. Both of these factors would degrade the driving experience or adversely <br />affect adjacent residences and increase costs. Gravel roads in the area are maintained by homeowner <br />associations. With the project, traffic volumes on Country Drive and Pit Way would increase and result <br />in an associated maintenance cost increase. Cost impacts depend on the extent to which the project is <br />required to participate in upgrading the roads to avoid impacts or pay a proportional cost of maintenance. <br />The effects on snow removal needs and costs would be relatively low because snow removal is <br />determined by snowfall. Additional development might decrease the cost per residence if all residences <br />are required to contribute to the cost. <br />The project’s homeowner association would be responsible for all road maintenance on the site. Roads <br />would be required to be paved initially; therefore, maintenance costs would be relatively low for a period <br />of years until roads began to deteriorate. After that point, bituminous surface treatment would be required <br />every few years to maintain roads in optimum condition. Less frequent maintenance would result in <br />gradual deterioration of roads. In addition, snow removal would be the complete responsibility of the <br />residents and would be paid for by a homeowner association. The cost of snow removal on the upper
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.