My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />Accessory living quarters; <br />Dwelling, single-family; <br />Dwelling, two-family; <br />Dwelling, multiple-family; <br />Special care dwelling; <br />Parks and playgrounds <br /> <br />Under 17.36.020(2)(b) the following uses are allowed provided they only serve the residential PUD: <br /> <br />Community buildings; <br />Indoor recreation facilities including athletic clubs, fitness centers, sports courts, swimming pools, and <br />other similar uses; <br />Outdoor recreation facilities including swimming pools, sports courts or <br />Similar uses; <br />Electrical vehicle infrastructure, pursuant to KCC Chapter 17.66; and <br />Recreation vehicle storage areas. <br /> <br />The PUD Application is subject to the following provisions. <br /> <br />17.36.045 Review criteria. <br /> <br />1. Preliminary development plan: The Hearing Examiner shall evaluate a planned unit development <br />application and other evidence and testimony submitted into the record and shall issue a <br />recommendation based on the following considerations and criteria: <br />a. Criteria applicable to all PUDs: <br />i.PUD complies with all amendment criteria in KCC Chapter 17.98; <br />ii.PUD makes economic and efficient use of land, streets, and public services; <br />iii.PUD preserves usable open space, important natural features, and other amenities; <br />iv.PUD provides site design features that reasonably mitigate off-site impacts; and <br />v.Public benefits of PUD outweigh the effect of the modification of underlying zoning <br />standards. <br />b. Additional criteria applicable to PUDs on Rural Lands: <br />i.PUD is developed in a manner that maintains rural character; <br />ii.Non-residential uses within PUD are designed at a scale appropriate for rural area and <br />intended to serve only the residents of the PUD; and <br />iii.PUD provides appropriate transitions to surrounding properties and land uses. <br />iv.All new structures shall comply with the applicable standards contained in: (1) "Fire <br />Safety Considerations for Developments in Forested Areas: Fire Hazard Severity <br />Rating and Recommended Standards" (Northwest Interagency Fire Prevention <br />Group) Washington Department of Natural Resources Severity Type Rating System; <br />(2) standards adopted by Kittitas County Fire Protection Cooperative - <br />"Recommendations For Fire Safety and Prevention of Forest and Range Land in <br />Kittitas County Including Rural, Commercial and Private Developments"; and/or (3) <br />Urban Wildland Interface Code for structures outside a fire district. <br />2. Final development plan: The Director shall evaluate and the Board shall approve final development <br />plans for the PUD, provided the conditions imposed on the preliminary PUD approval, if any, have <br />been satisfied. (Ord. 2013-001, 2013) <br /> <br />As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with all of 17.36.045, with the exception of 17.36.045(ii). If <br />development standards are modified as part of a Development Agreement to allow retail uses, the <br />proposal will be consistent with the entire section. A final development plan shall be submitted in
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.