My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit D | March 2016 | Page 297 of 339 <br /> <br />3. Mining shall not be permitted in designated fish and wildlife habitat areas except as a part of <br />an approved flood control program or in conjunction with a habitat restoration or <br />enhancement plan, provided that such activities are demonstrated to be water-dependent. A <br />determination of water dependency shall be based on an evaluation of geologic factors such <br />as the distribution and availability of mineral resources for that jurisdiction, and a need for <br />such mineral resources, economic, transportation, and land use factors. This demonstration <br />may rely on analysis or studies prepared for purposes of comprehensive plan designations, <br />and may be integrated with any relevant environmental review conducted under SEPA <br />(RCW Chapter 43.21 C), or otherwise be shown in a manner consistent with RCW <br />90.58.100(1) and WAC 173-26-201 (2)(a). <br />4. Application for permits for mining operations shall be accompanied by operation plans, <br />reclamation plans, and analysis of environmental impacts in compliance with local <br />ordinances and sufficient to make a determination as to whether the project will result in net <br />loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes during the course of mining and after <br />reclamation. Creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority species and the <br />future productivity of the site may be considered in determining no net loss of ecological <br />functions. <br />5. The designation of mineral resource lands of long-term commercial significance and the <br />development of mineral resource activities must demonstrate that mining is dependent on a <br />shoreline location, and that demand cannot reasonably be accommodated in operations <br />outside shoreline jurisdiction. Information required to meet this criteria shall evaluate <br />geologic factors such as the distribution and availability of mineral resources and the need <br />for such mineral resources. <br />6. Renewal, extension, or reauthorization of in-stream and gravel bar mining activities requires <br />review for compliance with WAC 173-26-241(3)(h)(ii)(D)(IV). <br />7. A reclamation plan that complies with the format and detailed minimum standards of RCW <br />78.44 shall be included with any shoreline permit application for mining. In reviewing <br />reclamation plans together with permit applications, the Administrator shall determine <br />whether or not the plan is also consistent with this Program and other local regulations. An <br />inconsistent reclamation plan shall constitute sufficient grounds for denial of a shoreline <br />permit, provided, the applicant/proponent shall be given reasonable opportunity to revise the <br />plan. <br />8. Subsequent use of reclaimed sites shall be consistent with the provisions of this Program. <br /> <br />17B.06.130 Recreation. <br />A. Policies. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.480, the recreation policies of the 2016 Kittitas County <br />Shoreline Master Program shall be considered as policies of the Kittitas County Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />B. Regulations. <br />1. Recreational development is a priority use of the shoreline. Preference shall be given to <br />water-dependent uses such as fishing, swimming, and boating. Water-related and water- <br />enjoyment uses such as picnicking, hiking, and walking are permitted provided they do not <br />displace water-dependent uses and are consistent with the specific shoreline environment. <br />Non-water-related recreation facilities and/or support facilities such as parking lots shall be <br />located in upland areas. <br />2. Linkage of shoreline parks and public access points by means of linear access should be <br />encouraged. <br />3. Commercial and public recreation areas or facilities on the shoreline shall provide physical <br />or visual public access consistent with KCC 17B.05.040, Public access. <br />4. Commercial recreational facilities shall be consistent with the provisions of KCC 17B.06.060 <br />Commercial development.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.