My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit D | March 2016 | Page 296 of 339 <br /> <br />4. Natural in-stream features such as snags, uprooted trees, or stumps should be left in place <br />unless it can be demonstrated that they are causing significant bank erosion or higher flood <br />stages, or pose an unavoidable hazard to navigation. <br />5. In-stream structures shall allow for natural groundwater movement and surface runoff. <br />6. A professionally engineered design is required for any proposed in-stream structure. <br />7. The design of all dams and the suitability of the proposed site for dam construction shall be <br />certified by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington. The professional <br />design shall include a maintenance schedule. <br />8. For all dams that are not regulated by either the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission <br />licensing procedures, or the Washington State Department of Ecology reservoir permit <br />requirements, a maintenance agreement and construction bond for one hundred fifty <br />percent (150%) of the cost of the structure shall be filed with the Administrator prior to <br />construction. The maintenance agreement shall specify who is responsible for maintenance, <br />shall incorporate the maintenance schedule specified by the design engineer, shall require <br />annual inspections by a civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington and shall stipulate <br />abandonment procedures which shall include, where appropriate, provisions for site <br />restoration. <br />9. No in-stream structure shall commence without having obtained all applicable federal, state, <br />and local permits and approvals, including but not limited to a hydraulic project approval <br />(HPA) from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. <br />10. Shoreline modification projects shall be designed and constructed to avoid or minimize <br />impacts to sediment transport. <br /> <br />17B.06.120 Mining. <br />A. Policies. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.480, the mining policies of the 2016 Kittitas County <br />Shoreline Master Program shall be considered as policies of the Kittitas County Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />B. Regulations. <br />1. Mining below the OHWM of a river shall be permitted only when: <br />a. Removal of specified quantities of sand and gravel or other materials at specific <br />locations will not adversely affect the natural processes of gravel transportation for the <br />river system as a whole; and <br />b. The mining and any associated permitted activities will not have significant adverse <br />impacts to habitat for priority species nor cause a net loss of ecological functions of the <br />shoreline. <br />c. Determination of whether the two provisions above have been met shall be made <br />consistent with RCW 90.58.100(1) and WAC 173-26-201(2)(a). Such evaluation of <br />impacts should be appropriately integrated with relevant environmental review <br />requirements of SEPA (RCW Chapter 43.21C) and the SEPA rules (WAC Chapter 197- <br />11). <br />d. In considering renewal, extensions or reauthorization of gravel bar and other in-channel <br />mining operations in locations where they have previously been conducted, local <br />government shall require compliance with this subsection (1) to the extent that no such <br />review has previously been conducted. Where there has been prior review, local <br />government shall review previous determinations comparable to the requirements of this <br />Section to assure compliance with this subsection(1) under current site conditions. <br />e. The provisions of this Section do not apply to dredging of authorized navigation channels <br />when conducted in accordance with WAC 173-26-231(3)(f). <br />2. Mining within any channel migration zone that is within the shoreline jurisdiction shall require <br />a shoreline conditional use permit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.