My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ResolutiontoapproveContractforEnvironmentalArchaeologicalPlanningServices
>
Meetings
>
2017
>
02. February
>
2017-02-07 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
ResolutiontoapproveContractforEnvironmentalArchaeologicalPlanningServices
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2018 11:22:20 AM
Creation date
1/16/2018 11:19:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/7/2017
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Director's Signature on the Consultant Agreement for Professional Environmental, Archaeological and Planning Services Contract
Order
28
Row ID
34676
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Attachment A- FYI NAI OH Audit Report <br />Nortli American Infrastructure <br />A Itusiness link of.lavmhs Engineering Groep Inc. <br />Notes to Statements of Fringe Benefit Expeu-w <br />.incl General & Administrative Expense <br />for the Fiscal Year Ended October 2, 2015 <br />2. Bltxis ol'Accaunting and Description of Accounting Systems (continued) <br />F_Mrlive September 38- 20 B. the beginning of F1' 201-1, Jacobs exceeded the Cost Accounting Standard <br />(CAS 1 iO3 threshold ror requiring the use of the three-lacior farmulu for allocating its Ccrporale Residual <br />Expense Pool (reference CAS 9904.403-40(c)(2)). As a result. theaccontpanyini, Statement ol'General & <br />Administrative Expenses includes Jacobs' Residual Pool allocated using the three -factor tornado 6.e.. <br />average of revenues, payroll S's and net fixed assets.) <br />3. Allocation Methods <br />The Company has established two indirect rates: (I) an AI -Office Rate that is applied to worts performed in <br />Jacobs -provided facilities, and (2) tilt At -Site Rate that is applied to wodi; performed at non -Jacobs (i.e_ <br />customer) provided facilities. The allocation base for 111e At -Site GSA rate includes all Professional <br />Services and all Field Stall Direct Labor inclndim_ premiums. The allocation base for the At -Office G&A <br />rale includes At -Office Proressional Services and A: -Office Field Sinfl'Direcl Labor including prentiunls. <br />C:ontlacl labor is not included in the direct labor base, and it is charged direct to projects as an ODC. <br />Tile Company uses the same fringe benefit rate for both its At -Office and Ai -Site direct labor and nflocnles <br />firinue benefit expenses based upon total payroil dollars (including premiums and excluding incentive <br />compensation.) <br />T he C'ompanv receives an allocation oncosts from tate Parent Company that includes salaries. related firinile <br />benefits and general and administrative expenses. Tltc G&A expenses include the costs of ccrinin executive <br />management. legal. accounting. Ireasury. inrurntntion technolog3 . lltlnlan resourcm health and s:slcly. and <br />other corporate functions. these costs are allocated to the Company based upon n three-tier method, whirl) <br />allocates costs that are: (1) directly attl•ibulable to the Company: (2) separately associated with the Company <br />that are allocated based upon appropriate bases that use direct labor dollars. total payral I dollars. revenues. or <br />a combination thereo!: -Ind. (3) nmotutts remaining after the first itt•o tiers. allocated basal upon a nvo-!actor <br />formula Ili -,%I is computed usitt.- Proressionai Service and Ficld 5lafrpayfal! dollars and revenues. <br />The allocations or the Parent Company's Corporate Home Office costs have been properly acfjusled to reflect <br />FA R Part 31 disallowances. These amounts were determined by the same midi -step process as described <br />nhnve Ifs 1`ale ', lite net al[mvable msls far each of the Cbrllnrate I lcmile Orfice cost pools :u a then allocated <br />Using Ilse metlwdolugies described above. <br />-f. E.l'CeSS Compensnfian <br />The unallowable indirect labor tldjusuncnl of S41G.58.5 incluCles a disallowance of$ 10'.170 based oil <br />application of tlic S497.000 brnchmatk and an additional 311.335 was disallowed based on the compensation <br />aral)'SiS 01111 Jacobs performs annually. As part of this analysis. senior exeCLlliV S well bcnchm;n>ted in <br />surveys in [which Jacobs particfpnled. -I I1C overall I•CSLIIIS Of the ccinpellsalion analysis shiltt'L'Ct Mat Ilio <br />THIS DOCUMEIJT'CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMA-ADN THAT HAS COMMERCIAL ANDrOR FINANCIAL VALUE. <br />SUCH INFORMATION HAS NQ. BEEN PUBLICLY DISCLOSED AND 15 EXEMPT FROM DISCLCSURE UNDER THE FREEDOM Or <br />INFORMATION ACT AND ALL OTHER SIMILAR LEGISLATION. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. REQUESTS WRITTEN NOTICE BEFORE <br />ANY PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IS MADE. <br />9of-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.