HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 2023-073BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION
No.: 2023 - O+3
ADOPTING THE KITTITAS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
WHEREAS: Kittitas County, in conjunction and discussion with the Kittitas County
Conference of Governments, partnered with the City of Ellensburg to hire
a consultant, TIP Strategies, to develop a joint economic development
strategic plan with implementation actions to guide economic
development efforts in the region; and
WHEREAS: The consultant used a three-phase planning model (discovery, opportunity,
and implementation) to develop the plan. The discovery phase is designed
to emphasize the process of learning what makes the community unique.
The opportunity phase ensures a focus on the big idea (or ideas) that will
contribute to the community's economic vitality and garner widespread
support for the planning process. The implementation phase focuses on the
desired outcome and the steps needed to translate ideas into action; and
WHEREAS The Kittitas county Economic Development Strategic plan is intended to
be a five-year plan to guide actions and investments and be revisited on a
regular basis to take advantage of market conditions and opportunities;
and
WHEREAS: The Strategic Action Plan is a key component of the Kittitas County
Economic Development Strategic Plan, and executing the wide range of
actions needed to positively impact the community's economic vitality
requires extensive collaboration and cohesion among local stakeholders in
the coming years.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: the Board of County Commissioners hereby
adopts the Kittitas County Economic Development Strategic Plan, attached hereto, and
commits to working collaboratively across the region to collectively foster a more vibrant
and resilient economy for our county's citizens and businesses.
ADoPTED ttris --:l&ta, ,t W?fi I 2023
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
, WASHTNGTON
Vice-Chairman
Commissioner
BOARD
ie A. Kjorsvik
n
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHI NGTON
February 2023
(.$
Acknowledgments
TIP Strategies, lnc., would like to thank the following participants who contributed to the planning process.
Steering Cornmittee Members
. James Brooks, lnland Networks
. Jim DeVere, City of South Cle Elum
. John Glondo, City of Cle Elum
. Jeff Greear, Central Paving
. Richard Hink, City of Kittitas
. Mike Hougardy, Kittitas County
. Linda Huber, Kittitas County
. CarlJensvold, Ellensburg Rodeo
. Marc Kirkpatrick, Encompass Engineering & Surveying
. Gerald Lael, Lael lnsurance & Financial Services
. Stephen Malek, Basecamp Books and Bites
. Jay McGowan, City of Cle Elum
. Amy McGuffin, Kittitas County Chamber of Commerce
Client Leadership Team
Cory Wright, County Commissioner, District 1
. David Miller, City of Ellensburg
. Andrew Morse, Central Washington University
. Margaret Reich, CenterFuse
. Linda Schactlel Central Washington University
. Geoff Scherer, City of Roslyn
. Steve Sowers, City of South Cle Elum
. Steve Townsend, Kittitas County Chamber of
Commerce
. Brandis Van lterson, Shoemaker Manufacturing
. Dane Williams, lron Horse Brewery
. Pam Wilson, Cashmere Valley Bank
. Hannah Woodiwiss, City of Kittitas
a
Consulting Team
STRATEG I ES
TIP Strategies, lnc., is an Austin-based firm providing
consulting and advisory services to public and private
sector clients. Established in 1995, the firm's core
competency in strategic planning for economic
development has broadened to include expertise in
talent strategies and organizational development.
Heidi Behrends Cerniwey, City Manager
Bruce Tabb, City Council Member (former)
Contact
TIP Strategies
13492 N Hwy 183, Suite 120-254 Austin, TX 78750
PH: +1 5123439113
wlv w.tlp,slral eg ie_ s,_o o rr
Project Contributors
Jeff Marcell, Senior Partner
Alex Cooke, SVP, Consulting
Victoria Wilson, Consultant
a
a
Cover images courtesy of Kittitas County
Contents
Project Overview.....
Approach...
Takeaways
Strategic Action Plan
Goal 1. Collaboration....
Goal 2. Economic Resilience
Goal3. Balanced Growth
Goal 4. Community lnvestment
Goal5. Preservation
Planning Context
Economic Context........
SWOT Analysis
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Project Overview
Kittitas County (the County) has reached a tipping point. Following three decades of strong population grouh, driven
almost exclusively by net domestic migration, the County has experienced accelerated growth in recent years.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic is accelerating this trend as those who have flexible work
arrangements, or who can afford to move out of higher-cost urban markets, choose desirable locations like Kittitas
County. The steady influx of people looking to purchase primary residences or vacation homes has placed pressure on
an already strained housing market, driving home prices out of reach for many. Managing this growth will require a
collaborative approach that brings together those who want to see change and those who dont.
This need for consensus building comes at a time when economies around the world are experiencing a lack of
confidence in public sector institutions at every level. For Kittitas County, this larger trend was perhaps illustrated
most clearly in the resounding defeat of proposals to reestablish a port district in the County in 2016 and 201g.
Like many such complex initiatives, proponents faced the difficulty of explaining the role of these tools in
promoting and financing economic development, a field that is often poorly understood and which can evoke
anxiety in those who fear change. Meanwhile, the County has continued to struggle to raise the funds needed for
infrastructure investments that can help manage existing growth and generate quality jobs for local residents.
The creation of a transparent, actionable economic strategic plan marks an important first step in addressing
these concerns. What County leaders do with this plan will set the stage for Kittitas County's future.
Approach
Kittitas County and the City of Ellensburg (the City) engaged
TIP Strategies (TlP) to develop a comprehensive strategic
plan to guide economic development efforts in the region.
For this plan, TIP's three-phase Theory tnto practice
planning model-discovery, opportunity, and
implementation-was combined into two phases to meet
project-specif ic objectives.
Beyond its value as an organizing structure, the TIP planning
model helps reinforce a commitment to getting it right. The
discovery phase is designed to emphasize the process of
learning what makes a community or region unique. The
opportunity phase ensures a focus on identifying the big idea
(or ideas) that will contribute to the community's economic
vitality and garner widespread support for the planning
process. The implementation phase focuses on the desired
outcome and the steps needed to translate ideas into action.
Figure 1. Project Approach
DISCOVERY
1.1 Project Launch
1.2 Planning Context
1.3 Economic Context
1.4 Leadership Workshop
1.5 Stakeholder Engagement
1.6 Network Analysis
1.7 Findings Report
2.5 Final Presentation and Workshop
2.6 Virtual lmplementation
Workshops
2.7 Year 1 Scorecard
OPPORTUNITY AND IMPLEMENTATION
2.1 Best Practices
2.2 0pportunity Workshop
2.3 Strategic Plan
2.4 lmplementation Matrix
With the guidance of a 24-member steering committee, the
planning process included a robust analysis of economic,
demographic, and workforce data, as well as extensive
stakeholder input, and a series of economic development
workshops for local practitioners. TIP will also conduct
three additional workshops during the plan's first 180 days and provide a one-year scorecard to support the
implementation process.
o=
PAGE 1 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Stakeholder engagement is a critical component of the TIP planning model. Throughout the engagement,
discussions with local experts, community leaders, employers, and others informed the development of goals and
strategies. ln total, eight roundtables were held with stakeholders from key sectors, as well as 30 one-on-one
interviews with community leaders, government officials, and key sector representatives. Additionally, regular
meetings with the project steering committee provided guidance on the strategic direction of the plan.
To ensure continued participation and input through the process, leadership and opportunity workshops were also
held. The leadership workshop took place at the end of the discovery phase and gathered the steering committee
and additional community stakeholders to determine the direction of the plan. The opportunity workshop was a
large, in-person event where participants were able to comment on the initial strategies for accomplishing the
goals laid out during the leadership workshop.
ln an effort to increase collaboration among economic development organizations in Kittitas County, TIP led two
additional workshops targeted at these groups. The workshops included discussions on oppprtunities for relationship
building, barriers to collaboration, and protocols and agreements to facilitate working together toward shared goals.
Findings from these stakeholder engagement activities were supplemented and refined by discussions with the
project steering committee, including the use of Mentimeter (an interactive polling tool) during regular committee
meetings. An overview of the stakeholder engagement process is provided in Figure 2. Highlights from the data
analysis and TIP's review of the County's strengths, opportunities, weaknesses, and threats (SWOT analysis) are
provided in Section 3.
Figure 2. Stakeholder Engagement Overview
INTERVIEWS AND ROUNDTABLES STEERING COMMITTEE
sAsqs$o,90
fr-tr
30
lnterviews
8
. lndustry leaders
n Economic development. Government officials. Communily leaders
" Healthcare. Energy. Central Washington University
ECONOMIC DEVELOPERS
. Agricullure
o Real estale. TourismI Young professionals
. Manufacturing
" Small business (upper and lower County). Technology/remoleworkers
TIP PTANNING MODET WORKSHOPS
24
Membels
r Slruclured to provide broad
represenlalion. Facilitated regular meetings to provide
insight and guidance
. Used inleractive polling tool
(Mentimeter) to solicit input
Roundtables
ooo ,ffi
rFilFilet
3121
Workshops with Live Polling Discovery 0pportunig lmplementation
Facilitated discussions on
collaboration with economic
development organizations in the
County. Solicited input via interactive
polling tool (Mentimeter).
Presented d iscovery findings
to steering commitlee and
local leadership. Achieved
consensus on plan's five
guiding principles.
Presented plan goals and high-
level strategies to local leaders
and communily members.
Breakout groups provided input
and recommendations.
To be in the six months
following plan's release. Used
to evaluate progress and adjust
the plan as needed.
PAGE 2 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, II'ASHINGTON
Takeaways
Based on insights gained from the data analysis and stakeholder engagement tasks, the following story emerged
Kiftifas County rs a great place to live, but it is rapidly becoming unaffordable for many residenfs.
Situated in a region that includes the Cascade Mountains, the upper Yakima River Valley plains, and the Columbia
River, Kittitas County has an abundance of beautiful natural assets as well as opportunities for outdoor
recreation. Residents of the County affirm it is a great place to live. And with a population of just over 44,000,
many residents especially appreciate the small town feel and tranquility the region offers.
It is these characteristics that have drawn a growing number of new residents to the area over the past few
decades. The COVID-19 pandemic continued to fuel this trend, as remote workers looked to escape nearby cities
at the outset of the crisis. This influx of people has increased the demand for housing, making the County
unaffordable to existing residents. ln fact, the cost of living has increased such that many who work in the County,
live outside of the County where housing is more affordable.
As population growth is likely to continue, planning for this growth will be essential to maintaining the County's
character. Strategically increasing housing supply and density in the County's cities and towns, as opposed to
encouraging sprawl, and improving connections among towns can help mitigate the affordability issue.
The County's central location and outdoor rcmeation oppoftunities are assets that could be
harnessed for economic growth.
The County is centrally located in Washington State and is fewer than 1 00 miles from both Seattle and the port of
Tacoma. This location is an asset that has already proven instrumental to hay exports and could serve a similar
role in other industries. With additional investments in transportation infrastructure, the County could become a
hub for logistics and distribution operations.
The County's location also drives tourism. Just a few hours' drive from Seattle, Kittitas County has plenty to offer
visitors. From skiing in Snoqualmie Pass, to hiking in the Upper County, and fishing in the Yakima River, opportunities
for outdoor recreation abound. While tourism comes with disadvantages-congestion and lower-wage jobs, for
example-there is also an opportunity to further develop this sector so that it can become an economic engine in the
County. Fostering existing brewing operations, recreation outfitters, art and entertainment offerings, and small-scale
manufacturing could deepen the knowledge base in the County while creating higher quality jobs for residents. Furthel
establishing and supporting partnerships among existing stakeholders and creating programs to support
entrepreneurs in tourism and recreation-related ventures in the County could help organize and strengthen this sector.
In the face of this growth, the County's natural resources, agricaltural lands, and open spaces
musf be managed carcfully.
Many of those who are concerned about the County's growth fear that the local way of life is changing.
lndiscriminate construction and sprawl encroach on agricultural land, create additional traffic, and put pressure
on the County's natural resources. These challenges are real, and as the County continues to grow, they will only
become more prominent.
However, there is a lot the County can do to manage this growth and support legacy industries. Community
planning, for example, could support development around urban centers, creating additional density and
diminishing the number of vehicles on the road. Similarly, targeted infrastructure investments can also shape the
community by designating specific areas for commercial and industrial development. Support for farmers as they
face increasing property taxes and succession planning challenges could help them stay in business.
PAGE 3 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
The County's grovvth also raises concerns about water availability. Droughts have become more frequent, and
water for new development is a limited resource. The County is currently working toward securing its water
sources with the Yakima Basin lntegrated Plan, and support should continue for these efforts. Additionally, almost
two-thirds of land in Kittitas County is publicly owned, and much of it is covered by forests. Recent droughts have
increased wildfire risks, which are exacerbated by a growing population in these areas. For these reasons,
sustainability will be a concern for the County as it aims to preserve its natural assets. With the presence of
Central Washington University (CWU) there's an opportunity to develop knowledge in these areas.
Building a more diverse economy, with a strong connection to ffre university, can help retain
talent, including young people.
lndividuals who participated in interviews and roundtables often shared concerns about the lack of opportunities
for young people starting their careers in the County. Even though CWU is located in Ellensburg, most students do
not stay in the County after graduation.
One of the challenges in retaining young talent is the lack of diversity in the industries and jobs present within the
County. Healthcare, education, retail, and accommodation and food services are the region's largest employers,
but there is an opportunity to grow and develop other sectors to diversify the local economy. Light manufacturing,
tourism, aviation, craft brewing, agriculture innovation, logistics and distribution all offer opportunities for
diversification. The County's existing businesses and real estate assets relevant to these industries, such as
Bowers Field and Snoqualmie Pass, strengthen the case for developing them further.
Additionally, CWU is already a partner in some of these industries with its craft brewing, aviation training, and
agriculture business programs. Continuing to invest in these programs and deepening the connection between
the local economy and the university's offerings would improve talent retention.
Achieving tfiis more resilienf and susfain able future will require better coardination and
messaging among partners rcgardinE shared goals.
Kittitas County can no longer afford to operate in silos. lts top challenges include managing growth, improving
housing affordability, diversifying the economy, and sustaining its natural resources-challenges that are difficult
to address, yet not insurmountable in a united region.
The economic development workshops held throughout this project revealed a number of challenges facing these
organizations. There is a need to clearly define roles, as there are overlapping roles among them, as well as gaps
in some key functions. Some potential areas for collaboration include grant funding, community development
projects, business leader mentoring, business development, and entrepreneurship. According to participants, the
biggest challenges to collaboration are poor communication, limited resources, unclear roles, and the lack of trust
and a shared vision among organizations.
To take control of its future the County will need to unite its local governments, organizations, and resources and
apply them toward common goals. This will require deliberate, frequent coordination among partners as well as
clear messaging.
Plan Framework
During the leadership workshop, participants discussed and refined five guiding principles that establish the
direction for this strategic plan. These guiding principles reflect the priorities and needs of the community as it
looks to the future, and as such became the strategic plan's goals. Figure 3 (page 5) outlines the plan structure,
including the plan's goals and high-level strategies.
PAGE 4 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
z.O-FkJd
=gU1Jo()
l!(J
z.u.l
=NAd
r [lJ<To=C'>(f,
z.oc)u-l
F
=oaE
J(9<oo!l{cez
J
o
Fz.
LU
F(n
1g<:-o-o>
J
Oc)
z.()tJ'Fr<<to!rofrt
CL
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Figure 3. Plan at a Glance
Unite upper and lower County government and organizations in slmred goa ls and action that benefit he County as a whole.
STRATEGIES
1.1 . Unify economic development organizations behind a common vision and improve collaboration, communication,
and goal tracking to deliver successful outcomes for the County.
1.2. Continue to promote the County's identity and high quality of place to support tourism, business attraction, and
talent attraction and retention.
1.3. Forge a closer relationship among CWU, the City of Ellensburg, the County, and the local business community.
Provide resrdents with tools and resources to access jobs and opportunities in the area, including entrepreneurship.
STRATEGIES
2.1. Strengthen the County's talent pipeline by aligning development, attraction, and retention efforts with the needs
of current and future employers.
2.2. lmprove coordination between CWU and employers to create opportunities for learning and employment for
students and community members alike (e.9., internship programs).
2.3. Align and strengthen the network of entrepreneurial support organizations.
Direct and manage the grcwth of the County to build a dynamie eommunity that renains an attactive and affordahle
place to live.
STRATEGIES
3.1. Encourage the development of a diverse housing stock to meet the needs of a growing population.
3.2. Position the County for targeted real estate development, including commercial and light industrial space, to
meet business needs.
3.3. Support business growth and retention and focus recruitment efforts on industries that align with community values.
3.4. Create a vibrant quality of place by supporting the creative economy and investing in shared community and
outdoor recreation assets.
Develop the County's infrastructure to meet its current and future needs and position it to anplify the advantage of
its cental location.
STRATEGIES
4.1. Engage the public in conversations on the benefits of community investment in economic infrastructure and
quality-of-place amenities.
4.2. ldentify and prioritize infrastructure investments that would support economic development (e.g., transportation,
aviation, utilities, water access).
4.3. Explore new options for funding community investments (e.9., 0klahoma City Metropolitan Area Projects, MAPS,
model).
Preserve the legaey of the County, valuing its assets and resources to turn them into opportunities f or f utwe generations.
STRATEGIES
5.1. Preserve the agricultural legacy of the County by supporting local farmers, pursuing value-added opportunities,
and leveraging agricultural knowledge for innovation.
5.2. Partner with CWU and others to develop knowledge-based industries tied to the County's natural assets, such as
outdoor recreation, agriculture, and sustainability/resilience-oriented opportunities.
5.3. Use community planning to preserve the Gounty's character while addressing its growth needs.
PAGE 5 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Strategic Action Plan
The most important aspect of any strategic plan is its implementation. Executing the wide range of actions
needed to positively impact a community's economic vitality requires extensive collaboration and cohesion
among local stakeholders. Further, strategic plans take years to implement, and as such cannot rely on specific
individuals to carry them forward. lnstead, they depend on organizations, strong networks, and enduring systems
for cooperation.
While Kittitas County has seen progress in the past decade, implementing economic development initiatives remains a
challenge. Specifically, barriers to communication and information sharing limit the County's effectiveness.
Kittitas County has an opportunity to coalesce behind this strategic plan to collectively foster a more vibrant and
resilient economy for everyone in the County. To that end, a few organizations will be primarily responsible for
leading the plan's implementation. They include the following.
r Kittitas County
. The City of Ellensburg
r Kittitas County Conference of Governments
. CentralWashingtonUniversity
. Economic development partners within Kittitas County (including the Kittitas County Chamber of Commerce
and CenterFuse)
While these organizations will take the lead on strategic initiatives, they will require the support of other local
organizations and community stakeholders. Additionally, given the significant time and effort required to
implement economic development strategic plans, this plan also recommends that the City of Ellensburg and the
County partner in creating a fulltime position dedicated to carry forward the strategies outlined in the plan and
track progress toward goals. This position should be viewed as a step toward institutionalizing economic
development at the County and City levels to ensure continuity in the execution of strategic initiatives.
This plan outlines the strategies and actions needed to accomplish the five main goals. However, the tactical level
will be determined by the plan's implementers.
Goal 1. Collaboration
Unite apper and lswer County government and organizatians in shared goals and
actions that benef it the County as a whole.
Collaboration within a community is essential to making the most of available resources and building a dynamic
economy. Uniting the upper and lower County governments and organizations behind shared goals and actions
and increasing communication and cooperation will strengthen the County's ability to be a reliable partner in
attracting tourism, businesses, and funding opportunities.
By improving how Kittitas County stakeholders work together, there is a lot the County and the cities could
accomplish. For instance, developing a cohesive retail strategy would allow the County to be intentional in the
opportunities it pursues, while also increasing the tax base and improving access to services locally. lt could also
remove the barriers to doing business in the region by unifying planning and permitting standards. ln addition, it
could strengthen the community's identity by enhancing ties with and supporting cwU.
ln short, working better together will lead to greater success for the entire County.
PAGE 6 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Strategies and Actions
'1.1. Llnify economic development organizations behind a common vision and improve
collaboration, communication, and goal tracking to deliver successful outcomes for the County.
1.1.1. Form a coalition with regionaleconomic development partners, including the Kittitas County Chamber of
Commerce (the Chamber), CenterFuse, local downtown associations, among others, that meet regularly,
and authorize a formal agreement among this group.
1.1.1.1. Establish communication and collaboration protocols.
'1.1.1.2. Define roles for each organization and develop metrics to track progress against economic
development goals. Use City and County contracts as a guide.
1.1.1.3" Jointly report on metrics to community leaders on a quarterly basis.
1.1.2. Hire a full-time employee to oversee economic development and carry fonruard the recommendations included
in this strategic plan as part of an effort to formalize economic development at the City and County levels.
1.1.3. Build relationships with economic development personnel and public funding agencies, such as the Rural
Community Assistance Partnership, Washington State Department of Commerce, and other agencies.
1.1.3.1. Schedulebiannualmeetingswithdepartmentheadsandprogrammanagersattheirplacesof
business.
1.1.3.2. Host these individuals in Kittitas County on an annual basis to showcase regional assets.
"1.1.4. Develop a retail recruitment strategy.
1 .1 .4.1 . ldentify appropriate real estate.
1.1.4.2. Conduct a retail leakage analysis and consumer analysis.
1.1.4.3. Develop a marketing and outreach strategyto appropriate retailers.
1.1.5. Expand the role and membership of the Kittitas County Conference of Governments to coordinate and
collaborate across jurisdictions on regional planning efforts. Planning efforts should include areas such as
housing, parking, permitting, and public development agreements.
1.1.6. Develop a mapping tool (or unify existing tools) that makes current and planned parcel, zoning, and
infrastructure data publicly available.
1.2. Continue to promote the County's identity and high quality of place to support tourism,
business attraction, and talent attraction and retention.
1.2.'1. Develop a consistent and unified brand, marketing theme, and campaign that coordinates with the
messaging of municipalities, the Chamber, and downtown associations.
1.2.1.1. Promote the County's brand to key decision-makers in the Puget Sound region, state, and
additional spheres of influence.
1.2.1.2. Promote relevant details, utilizing the quantitative and qualitative data contained in this plan, that
highlight what makes the County's business climate competitive for emerging opportunities.
1.2.1.3. Regularly (quarterly or annually) create talking points for County leaders and partner
organizations that highlight positive developments in Kittitas County, success stories, and why it
is a desirable place to visit, live, work, and invest.
PAGE 7 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
1.2.1.4. Update County and City websites to highlight economic development opportunities and to market
opportunity zones.
1.2.2. lmplement Kittitas County's tourism strategy to highlight opportunities for recreation in the region, while
also preserving the sustainability of recreation assets.
1.2.2.1. Consider applying for the state of Washington's Rural Tourism Support (RTS) program as a region
to receive assistance in developing a community-centered destination development plan. After
successful completion of the program, apply for financial assistance from RTS.
1.2.2.2. Facilitate management program and messaging to mitigate recreational impacts to natural
resources and amenities.
1.3. Forge a closer relationship among CWU, the City of Ellensburg, the County, and the local
business community.
1.3.1. Formalize the standing meeting among CWU leadership and City and County partners to periodically
evaluate and discuss opportunities for closer collaboration.
1.3.1.1 . Use the meeting to provide updates on City and CWU projects/initiatives.
'1.3.1.2. Establish goals for collaboration.
1.3.2. Expand opportunities for community connection and service.
1.3.2.1. Explore the possibility of utilizing CWU's mental health program to serve the local community.
1.3.2.2. Connect visual and performing arts programs to the community by offering performances during
events and festivals and concerts in the downtown area.
1.3.3. lmprove access to CWU and its resources.
1.3.3.1. Lower barriers to use university facilities, such as athletic facilities, meeting halls, and
performance spaces and explore partnerships to construct and/or expand public facilities for
mutually beneficial purposes.
1.3.3.2" Expand CWU community relations office to include more than one employee to create continuity.
1.3.3.3. Evaluate the feasibility of adding weekend operations to encourage visitor engagement.
Goal 2. Economic Resilience
Provide residents with tools and resources f0 access jobs and opportunities in
the area, including entrepreneurship.
A vibrant economy requires a strong and resilient workforce-one that, given adequate tools and resources, can
acquire the skills to take advantage of job opportunities or start new businesses and entrepreneurial endeavors.
To this end, the County has the oppofiunity to forge partnerships between workforce organizations, improve
resource sharing, and ensure it is offering education and support the community needs to thrive.
Central Washington University is a significant asset to the County and will certainly play a role in strengthening
the regional talent pipeline. However, workforce organizations, local governments, and the Chamber have a much
bigger role to play in workforce development programming. A concerted effort among regional organizations and
frequent communication with local businesses to improve alignment can go a long way in improving the County's
economic resilience.
PAGE 8 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Strategies and Actions
2.1. Strengthen the County's talent pipeline by aligning development, attraction, and retention
efforts with the needs of current and future employers.
2.1.1. Form a partnership among economic development organizations, higher education institutions, and
employers to ensure training programs are meeting the needs of County employers. This partnership
should involve the Kittitas County Chamber of Commerce, the City of Ellensburg, CenterFuse, the South
CentralWorkforce Development Board, WorkSource, HopeSource, CWU, and localschool districts, among
others.
2.1.1.1" Evaluate and prioritize training initiatives that support economic development within the County.
2.'1.1.2. Connect entrepreneurs and small businesses to workforce development programs and efforts.
2.1.2. Leverage data to better align CWU and community needs (for example, alumni employment data to
understand who is staying in the County and who is leaving).
2.1.3. Promote the formation and expansion of industry sector councils to ensure the critical workforce and
business competitiveness needs of each sector are addressed.
2.2. lmprove coordination between CWU and employers to create opportunities for learning and
employment for students and community mernbers alike (e.g., internship programs).
create internship programs that give students an
opportunity to gain work experience while offering
businesses access to talent. Use the Puble
lLfre s-trueture S e auilyqvLej Edlealrail Sy s,t-em
(PISCES) cybersecurity program as a model.
ldentify and implement additional opportunities to
connect students with local organizations (business
community and nonprofits), including live client
projects and service learning and community
engagement.
Expand opportunities for a business development
center in the Upper County (Cle Elum), like the John
Pappajohn Entrepreneurial Center in lowa (see text
box). Such an initiative could be a joint effort
between CWU and the County with grant/EDA
financing.
lncrease CWU engagement and support of youth
development programs in the County. One such
example is Washington State's support for the 4-H
youth development program.
2.3. Align and strengthen the network of entrepreneurial support organizations.
2.3.1. Coordinate the Chamber, CenterFuse, downtown associations, and the lnstitute for lnnovation and
Entrepreneurship (l4lE) efforts to eliminate duplication, strengthen support systems, and target high-
opportun ity industries.
2.2.1
2.2.2.
2.2.3.
2.2.4.
John Pappajohn Entrepreneurial Center (JPEC)
ln addition to supporting the University of
lowa's entrepreneurship curricula, the JPEC
has a startup accelerator and incubator and a
range of competitions, awards, and challenges
open to students and non-students alike.
Entrepreneurs not affiliated with the university
can also receive assistance in the form of
business consulting, small business
development center workshops, and
import/export business education, research,
and consulting. JPEC also engages the
community by providing teachers with
professional development opportunities and
innovative curricula for K-12 and providing
resources to support small businesses.
Source(s): bfipsllrswalpiqa4l
PAGE 9 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
2.3.1.1. Catalog existing initiatives and evaluate for demand and effectiveness.
2.3.1.2. ldentify opportunities for the entrepreneurship program at CWU to work with local businesses.
2.3.1.3. Raise awareness of funding opportunities, such as crowdfunding (when eligible for securities
registration exemption) and Small Company Offering Registration, among others.
Goal 3. Balanced Growth
Direct and manage the County's growth to build a dynamic community that
remains an attractive and aff ordable place to live.
There are opposing views on the merits of growth in Kittitas County, which have hindered the County's ability to
take decisive economic action in any one direction. lndividual opinions aside, the County has grown substantially
over the past decade and will likely continue to do so. While growth itself may be inevitable, the magnitude and
direction of this growth can be managed to better align with the community's goals. Successfully directing growth
requires a strategy to retain and expand existing businesses, pursue target industries that align with the County's
values and resources, and develop or redevelop sites to meet those business needs.
As housing costs have risen dramatically throughout Kittitas County, managing growth will also require action to
improve affordability. Pursuing government funding, forming coalitions among partners, and undertaking joint
community planning efforts are all components to increasing housing stock across the affordability spectrum.
Supporting a diversity of amenities (quality of place) can influence where people want to live and help attract and
retain a broad spectrum of talented individuals and families.
Land use is essentialto economic development, and, as such, is addressed in this plan. However, it is important
to acknowledge that land use regulations are complex, unique to each community, and continuously evolving.
While land use appears prominently in the strategies and actions listed below, these are intended as suggestions
to be evaluated by County and City stakeholders.
Strategies and Actions
3.1. Encourage the development of a diverse housing stock to rneet the needs of a growing
population.
3.1.1. Continue implementing the recommendations in the City of Ellensburg's Housing Action Plan as a model
for other communities.
3.1.2. Conduct a housing analysis in the Upper County to assess current housing inventory and to evaluate the
regulatory environment, potential capacity, and locations.
3.1.3. Evaluate zoning/land use regulations to identify barriers to density and housing development as well as
opportunities to adopt common standards.
3.'1.3.1, lmplement policy and zoning changes to ensure that developments in Kittitas County are competitive
for state and federal funding. Zoning changes to consider include ensuring that multifamily zoning is
permitted, allowing modular housing and accessory dwelling units, designating community
revitalization areas, and allowing early learning facilities in multifamily zones.
3.1.3.2. Ensure land use regulations encourage development of "missing middle" housing and remove
potential barriers to housing development, such as parking requirements and setback sizes.
PAOT 1() I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTV, WASHINGTON
3.1.3.3. Evaluate permitting processes across the County to identify opportunities for greater efficiency
and to streamline the development process.
3.1.4. Expand the availability of housing across housing types and ranges of affordability.
3.1.4.1. Support an ongoing structure for regional collaboration regarding production of housing that is
affordable across the income spectrum.
3.'1.4.2. Give special consideration to areas with connections to jobs and along transit corridors, including
zoning for duplex, triplex, four-plex, courtyard apartments, etc.
3.1.4"3" Evaluate and leverage state and local funding tools and incentives for housing development,
including the following.
. Utilize HOME lnvestment Partnerships Program and National Housing Trust Fund Program
grants for development of low-income rental housing.
r Partner with Habitat for Humanity and the Housing Authority of Kittitas County on leveraging
the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program for low-income homeownership options.
. Engage Low-lncome Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) developers to explore opportunities to
leverage LIHTC funding for affordable housing.
. Consider waiving or reducing fees for low-income housing developments.
. Evaluate setting aside a portion of new construction property taxes for a County growth fund
for low-income housing.
3.1.4.4. Support the creation of community land trusts to ensure permanent affordability in connection to
an investment.
3.1.4.5. Evaluate landowner incentive programs to increase the supply of affordable workforce housing.
Some examples include the following.
. Explore models like the Turns for Tenants Program. Mt. Hood Meadows, a ski resort in Mt.
Hood, Oregon, provides season passes of 10-day tickets to landlords who rent to Mt. Hood
Meadows employees. To be eligible, landlords must cap the rent.
. Consider the Lease to Locals Program. Homeowners in the Town of Truckee, California,
receive grants ranging from 52,000 to $18,000 and a tenant matching service in exchange for
renting to income-qualified local workers. Since 2020, the program has converted 100 units to
long-term rentals, housing over 220 residents.
3.1.4.6. Engage residents in conversations on the benefits of housing density.
3.2. Position the County for targeted real estate developrnent, including commercial and light
industrial space, to meet business needs.
3"2.X. Support real estate development projects that will have the highest, long-term impact on business
development opportunities, employment growth, amenities, and tax-revenue generation.
3.2.1.1. Work collaboratively across the County to ensure that adequately sized industrial and commercial
property is available and marketable for economic development projects.
3.2,1.2. Hold regular forums with commercial brokers to discuss Kittitas County perceptions,
opportunities, and regional development activity.
PAGE 11 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PIAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
3.2.2. Evaluate and prepare shovel-ready sites for future business development (including light industrial sites,
retail, etc.).
3.2.2.1. Maintain an inventory of available sites, including privately held sites. The inventory should
catalog preferred properties suitable for industrial, commercial, and retail development in Kittitas
County, including location, size, ownership, zoning, environment, planning, shovel readiness, and
infrastructure requi rements.
. List available sites on a centralized County (and City) website and cross-list them on other
regional economic development websites and broker sites.
3.2.2.2. Evaluate infrastructure availability and quality in existing and future business and industrial parks
3'2.3. Develop land at Bowers Field and Business Park for light industrial, retail, training, and commercial use.
3.2.3.1. Create a master plan for Bowers Field and Business Park including a layout plan, to position the
airport to attract businesses that will increase tax revenue and offer quality employment
opportunities.
3.2.3.2. lnvest in infrastructure needed to ensure sites are shovel ready.
3.2'3.3. Develop facilities needed to recruit aviation manufacturing companies and support expanding
aviation training program.
3.2.3.4. Explore expansion of CWU aviation program and develop agility to meet industry training needs.
3.3. Support business growth and retention and focus recruitment efforts on industries that
align with community values.
3.3' 1. lmplement a business retention and expansion (BRE) initiative focused on the County's employers to grow
the regional economy.
3.3.1.1. Establish a local visitation program in which Chamber staff meet one-on-one with employers to
ensure business needs are communicated and met.
3.3'1.2. Structure local business visits to achieve several specific outcomes, including education, data
collection, risk management, and testimonial collection.
o Educate the employer about the Chamber's economic development function.
. Collect answers to a standard set of questions about the employer's challenges during in-
person business visits and identify ways the Chamber can help address those challenges.
" Ask about potential supplier recruitment opportunities that would benefit existing employers
during in-person business visits with manufacturers.
. Capture testimonials from employers about why Kittitas County is a good business location
for them.
3.3.1.3. Build an understanding of the major employers within each of the County's key industries and
their corresponding emerging opportunities. Figure 4 (page 14) lists emerging market
opportunities
3'3'1.4. ldentify and incorporate additional BRE outreach partners for increased collaboration, resorlrce
sharing, and reach given the Chamber's limited resources. Target partners that have extensive
local business interface, including downtown associations and CenterFuse.
3'3.1.5. ldentify local companies at risk of losing growth momentum, relocating, or downsizing.
PAGE 12 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
3.3.2
3.3.3
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINCTON
3.3.1.6. Develop a communications system with City and County governments that notifies various
department representatives within these entities how they can mitigate issues that might impede
groMh or lead to a specific company closure or departure.
3.3.1.7. Establish a monthly numerical target for business visitations.
3.3.1.8. Offer tech support to small businesses.
Position Bowers Field and Business Park as an aviation training and light manufacturing hub.
Create an initiative to support the region's outdoor manufacturing and recreation industries. The Growing
outdoors Partnership established in North carolina is an example (see text box).
3.3.3.1. Engage a variety of regional partners-
economic development, business Growing 0utdoors Partnership (G0P)
community, and others with a stake in Formed in 2018, GOP is an initiative designed
outdoor manufacturing and recreation-to to expand Western North Carolina's outdoor
garner support and funding and foster manufacturing and recreation industries. The
industry growth. GOp focuses its efforts on workforce
3.3.3.2. Leverage existing assets to minimize development, entrepreneurship, growing
development costs. markets through regional branding,
connecting the cluster and supply chain, and
3.3.3.3. ldentify potential programs to support the economic development. lnitiatives include
initiative, such as education and training new degree programs, certificates,
options, job boards, an accelerator, regional continuing education, a new outdoor industry
branding, and supply chain connections. job board, access to capital, an outdoor
3.3.4. Leverage the presence of breweries in Kittitas County acceleratol and more. Since its inception, it
and CWU's craft brewing program to cultivate tne craft has generated $10 million in investment,
brewing sector. (Cities that have benefited from this added 426.5 jobs, and created an
approach include Fort Collins, Colorado; Asheville, international industry conference.
North Carolina; and Walla Walla, Washington.) Source(s): hllps:l/ourdoorswnc.coml
3.3.4.1 . Engage industry and economic development
stakeholders to pursue growth opportunities in the craft brewing sector and attract visitors.
3.3.4.2. Support the creation of an industry showcase that builds Kittitas County's reputation in the
industry.
3"3.5. Support the development of timber industries, such as small diameter cross-laminated timber (CLT) and
biomass production.
3.3"5"1. Gain an understanding of the small diameter CLT industry to evaluate its value proposition.
3.3.5.2. Evaluate the potential for biomass energy production in the County.
3.4. Create a vibrant quality of place by supponting the creative economy and investing in shared
community and outdoor recreation assets.
3,4.1. Pursue creative district designation in the City of Ellensburg.
3.4.2. Develop amenities (family-oriented, indoor).
3.4.2.1. Consider developing a community recreation center or recruiting organizations such as the YMCA
that could fillthis gap.
3.4.3. Utilize County and City-owned property for catalyst development projects.
PAGE 13 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KIT TITAS COU[\ITY, IVASHINGTON
3.4.4. Work with CWU to develop the steam plant into a space that serves members of the university and
community alike.
Figure 4. Emerging Market Opportunities
Tourism, Arts, and Entertainment
Visitors are increasingly drawn to the County for its natural beauty, variety of outdoor activities,
the rodeo, arts, and other events. Continuing to develop its amenities and identity will strengthen
this sector.
0utdoor Recreation and Manufacturing
Kittitas County has extensive outdoor recreation assets that support a range of activities, such
as hiking, skiing, snowmobiling, and fishing. The County should continue to support these assets
as well as foster local recreation equipment manufacturing.
Aviation Manufacturing and Training
CWU's growing aviation training programs and Bowers Field are significant assets to the County
ln addition to expanding the aviation training programs, there is an opportunity to develop an
aviation light-manufacturing sector.
Beverage Arts
A healthy tourism sector, nearby hops production, and existing craft breweries, wineries, and
cideries offer excellent conditions under which to grow the beverage industry and the County's
reputation in this space.
lnnovative Timber lndustries
The vast amount of timber in the County points to opportunities in biomass and cross-laminated
timber production. The County's active construction sector makes partnerships with cross-
laminated timber firms worth pursuing.
Agriculture and Land Resiliency/Sustainability
Extreme weather events have challenged the agricultural industry and have increased the threat
of wildfire events. The County has already made strides in securing its water sources and can be
a leader in innovative sustainable agriculture and land management practices as well.
Logistics and Distribution
Kittitas County has long served as an export hub for the hay industry. The County could further
leverage its strategic location to serve as a key connection point in other supply chains.
ffioal 4" fromsmalnrity lmwestment
Develop tfie Cr:unty's infrastructure to meef its currenf and frifure nseds and
pasition ff fo arnp lify the arlvantage of ifs eentral lae atian.
Attracting target industries and building existing businesses requires access to shovel-ready sites and existing
commercial, retail, and office space. A key element of this preparation is having the utilities, transportation, and
connectivity in place to meet business and community needs, as well the funds to support them. Washington
,w
PAGE 14 I ECOI'iOMIC DEVELOPMEI{T STRA'TEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
State has limited economic development tools at its counties' disposal, requiring creative means of securing
investment and attracting businesses.
Extensive community engagement will be essential to this effort. Continuous communication will serve as a trust-
building exercise through which the County can prove it is a responsible steward of taxpayer dollars. lt will also allow
community leaders to communicate the value these investments can deliver. Public-private partnerships will also be
important to ensure critical assets are in place, opening the door for additional investment in the County.
Strategies and Actions
4.1. Engage the public in conversations on the benefits of community investment in economic
infrastructure and quality-of-place amenities.
4.1.1. Launch a County-led internal marketing campaign to instill civic pride and educate residents on the
importance of economic development as well as the connection between infrastructure and placemaking
to a region's economic vitality.
4.1.1.1. Regularly communicate economic development achievements, along with ongoing efforts,
projects, events, and stories ofthe County's recent successes, through a quarterly newsletter and
regular social media posts.
4.1.1.2. Profile Kittitas County residents who are involved in interesting ventures and are positively
impacting the community.
4.1.1.3. Share talking points and messaging with regional partners to unify messaging and encourage
them to share communication on their platforms.
4.1.1.4. Leverage local events to continue building civic pride and regional culture.
4"1.2. Engage Kittitas County residents in discussions about economic development and the future of the
County.
4.1.2.'1. Hold community discussions on economic development and the County's potential. Use
language from the plan's findings and guiding principles to help the community understand the
County's vision.
4.1.2.2. Ensure residents have an understanding of the County's strategic assets.
4.1.2.3. Celebrate current and future investments in place-based assets.
4.2. ldentify and prioritize infrastructure investments that would support economic development
(e.9., transportation, aviation, utilities, water access).
4.2.1. Continue to support and enhance regional transportation connections to ease movement throughout the
County.
4.2.1.1" These efforts should include adding parking and signage to reduce traffic on main roads, as well
as evaluating public transit routes.
4.2.2. Support broadband initiative to ensure high-speed connections across the County.
4.2.3. Extend utilities access to sites that are well-positioned for development.
4.2.4. Continue efforts to add and improve signage in the County to improve visibility and access.
PAGE 15 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
4.2.4.1. Add signage off key l-90 exits, like Cle Elum's entrance at exit 84 and Ellensburg's Canyon Road
entrance.
4.2.4.2. Support CWU's wayfinding initiative, which will improve the university's visibility throughout the
community.
4.3. Explore new options for funding community investments (e.E., Oklahoma City Metropolitan
Area Projects, MAPS, model).
4.3.1. Design a public investment strategy to spur private investment and talent retention/attraction in the
County. lt should build off the communication recommendations outlined in strategy 4.1, focusing on
transparency about the cost and value of the investment and building trust through incremental
successes.
4'3.1.1. Convene leaders from the Cityto evaluate possible structures and funding mechanisms for a
MAPS initiative.
4.3.1.2. Launch a public call for project ideas once the funding structure is determined.
4.3.1.3. Establish a leadership group made up of the parties involved in the funding process to review and
refine the publicly proposed projects.
4.3.2. Evaluate the potential for a port district.
4.3.2.1. Develop a roadmap for the district to clearly
communicate the potential return on
investment.
4.3.2.2. Use the tools and actions outlined in strategy
4.1 to educate and engage the community in
discussion about the value of a port district.
. Tell stories of successful port districts,
like the Port of Moses Lake (see text box).
. Consider limiting boundaries of a
potential port district to a smaller area, for
example, east Kittitas.
4.3.2.3. Advocate for enabling legislation, as
necessary.
Goal 5. Preservation
Preserve the legacy of the County, valuing lfs assefs and resources f0 turn them
into opportunities for f uture generatians"
The County has a history of dependence on natural-resource-based industries, like agriculture and logging. As
changing circumstances threaten farming and present environmental risks, the community will need to implement
innovative approaches to improve its resiliency. Examples include identifying and conserving water sources,
mitigating wildfire risk, and improving conditions for agriculture. There is an opportunity to not only preserve the
County's legacy, but also leverage its existing knowledge base to bring these industries into the future and provide
opportunities to the generations to come.
Port of Moses Lake, Washington
The Port of Moses Lake was created in 1965
to fund the opening of the Grant County
lnternational Airport and support
development in the area. The port operates
the airport, which is used primarily by private
firms, military, and Boeing for flight testing.
Property leases and rentals constitute the
majority of operating revenues, and it is
policy of the port to only lease, and not sell,
property. The port employs 18 full-time and 2
part-time employees. Over 60 industries are
represented at the port, employing over 3,500
people.
Source(s): https://www. p0rt0f mgseslake.com/
PAGE 16 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Another aspect of this goal involves conserving the County's
character. This means preserving historic buildings and
affordable housing stock and proactively planning for growth
so that the community can expand without transforming
substantially.
Strategies and Actions
5.1. Preserve the agricultural legacy of the County by
supporting local farmers, pursuinE value-added
opportunities, and leveraging agricultural knowledge
for innovation.
5.1.1. Establish an agriculture consortium that includes local
farmers, organizations, government officials, and
educational institutions to identify needs and
opportunities for growth in the industry.
5.1 .1 . 1 . Evaluate value-added opportunities, such as
food processing operations.
5.1.2. Provide localfarmers with information on federal and
state resources to support their businesses.
5.1.2.1. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Storage Facility Loan Program helps small to
mid-sized fruit-and-vegetable producers access cold storage and related equipment like pack-
and-wash stations. Smaller producers are now eligible for a waiver from the requirement to carry
Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program coverage or crop insurance when they apply for a
loan.
5.1.2.2. The USDA's microloan program allows beginning, small, and mid-sized farmers to access
S50,000 in loans.
5.1.2.3. Leverage Rural Business Development Grants.
5.1.3. Promote food and agriculture system innovation through multidisciplinary research.
5.1.3.1. Utilize Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Grants.
5.1.3.2. lncentivize innovation and light manufacturing ventures, including value-added agriculture
5.1.4. cultivate agritourism opportunities that are centered on local assets.
5.2. Partner with CWU and others to develop knowledge-based industries tied to the County's
natural assets, such as outdoor recreati0n, agriculture, and sustainability/resilience-oriented
opportunities.
5.2' 1 . Evaluate the feasibility of a wildfire resilience program, leveraging federal Community Wildfire Defense
Grant program funds (see text box for California example).
5.2.1.1. ldentify local partner organizations.
5.2.1.2. Offer a combination of college coursework and community workshops.
Wildfire Resilience Program (WRP) at Santa
Rosa Junior Gollege (SRJC)
ln response to wildfires that destroyed the
Sonoma County, California, region, SRJC
conceived the WRP to benefit all community
stakeholders. ln addition to complementing
SRJC's workforce training mandate, the WRP
offers paths to high-quality, welFpaying local
careers for residents, while supplying local
businesses with needed talent. SRJC secured
funding with the help of local elected officials,
built a network of regional employers, and
partnered with local nonprofits to build a
student pipeline for the program's target
demographic. The program has successfully
maintained enrollment of at least 300 students
per year, offering 5 to 10 paid internships per
year, and providing 10 to15 stipends for
partnerships with local organizations per year.
Source (s) : agsantarosa-edulwildlue-resilieleepragGtll
PAGE 17 lECoNoMtC DEVELopMENT STRATEGTC pLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
5.2.1.3. Develop internship programs for students.
5.2.2. ldentify all programs that might support the County's agricultural industry and identify ways these
programs can serve and connect with the local agricultural businesses/farmers.
5.2.2.1. Support CWU's agribusiness program.
5.2.2.2. Educate residents and students about the importance of land for agriculture through hands-on
experiences and marketing.
5.2.2.3. Encourage relationships between educational providers (middle and high schoolthrough
community college or trade school) and employers to expose young people to career options in
agriculture and create an understanding of pathways to those jobs.
5.2.2.4. Prioritize research and innovation that prepares this sector for the future.
5.3. Use community planning to preserve the County's character while addressing its growth needs.
5.3.1. Engage the County and cities in joint long-range planning efforts to address Countywide land use and
other needs.
5.3.1.1. lncentivize mixed-use developments that create density while offering proximity to retail and
amenities (see actions detailed in strategy 3.1).
5.3.2. Engage the Yakima Nation as a partner in economic development efforts.
5.3.2.1. Engage the Yakima Nation in community-building activities.
5.3.3. Advocate for, and invest in, resiliency and sustainability efforts, including addressing the community's
water needs and implementing wildfire mitigation strategies.
5.3.3.1. Support the wildfire risk mitigation strategies, such as vegetation management.
5.3.3.2. Continue investing in water needs to support the County's growth.
5.3.3.3. Explore pilot programs to enhance energy alternatives, such as geothermal energy, for grid resilience.
5.3.4. Allocate resources to preserve the County's historic buildings and housing stock.
5.3.4.1. Continue working with the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation.
5.3.4.2. Continue facade improvement and Main Street programs in Roslyn, Cle Elum, Thorp, and Ellensburg.
5.3.4.3. Leverage the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and the USDA Multifamily
Preservation and Revitalization funds for the preservation of the Countys affordable housing stock.
PAGE 18 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Planning Context
To provide a common foundation for the planning process, TIP compiled economic and demographic data that
highlights the County's competitive position. Coupled with insights gained from stakeholder engagement and the
experience of the TIP consulting team, this work served as the basis for an analysis of the County's strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOTs), a summary of which is presented in this section.
Economic Context
As part of the project's discovery phase, TIP assembled data describing the economic health of Kittitas County,
including state and national benchmarks. This comprehensive analysis was delivered as an interactive data
visualization. The Kittitas County Washington Economic Explorerlool covered a broad range of data points
encompassing population and demographics, workforce characteristics, housing characteristics, industry and
occupation composition, and commuting patterns. The following are selected highlights from this work.
Population growth rafes in ffiffitas County have accelercted in recent years driven by strong net
domesfic migration.
The number of Kittitas County residents has grown steadily since 1990. Recent population estimates indicate a
period of rapid growth since 2015, driven by strong net domestic migration. However, the 2020 Census suggests
a somewhat slower pace. While population estimates may diffel there is little doubt that people are moving to
Kittitas County. About 16 percent of residents in 2019 moved to the County from elsewhere. This share is more
than 25 percent for Ellensburg, alone, although this number is inflated by the influx of students each year. While
preliminary estimates may have overstated the increase since the 2010 Census, the County's population growth
rate has outperformed the state and the US.
Housing is rapidly becoming unaffordable for many /esidenfs.
Like population trends, home prices in Kittitas County have accelerated rapidly in recent years. As a result,
housing risks becoming unaffordable to many in the County. An analysis of American Community Survey data
found that nearly one-third of homeowners (31.4 percent) and more than one-half of renters (56.8 percent) were
cost burdened, defined as spending more than 30 percent of income on housing (Figure 6, page 21). A more
nuanced approach to housing affordability compares typical mortgage costs for a median-valued home to the
median household income of a region. Using this metric, even a household earning 35 percent more than the
median ($ZS,OOO; would struggle to afford the median home in the region (Figure 7, page 21). Factors influencing
home prices include the relatively strong levels of net in-migration seen in recent years (which increases the
demand for homes) and the large stock of seasonal homes (which can create inefficiencies in local markets).
PAGE 19 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Figure 5. Population Trend Comparisons
Annualpopulation estimates and officialtrends between the 2010 and the 2020 Census
140?"
83.2"/"
I Kittitas County, WA
I Bozeman, MT
,r,; Lewis County, WA
I Washington
I United States
C'(n
or
=ocl!
=('
o.oo
=lll(,zs
c,ute,
zul(tElrt4
20yo
000/o
80%
60Vo
40%
20Vo
\vo
'" jt + ''-
I -Cl q)< 6o F- q oQ y(\ oS o or € 6 oF No <n oF\ @6 oq qq qo 66 oo 6o oo oO o oi= oo -r ilJO O O O 6 O\ O O O OrO OO O() O OO O O OO OO O(:) O O OO Cie e.J $t N N c.t GI N €\ C! ct <\l N c\t $J N c.l 6t 6t C.t C! (\l
Source(s): US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program and 2020 Census Redistricting Data Program; Moody's Analylics; TIP Strategies,
lnc.
Note(s): Population estimales prior to 2010 are sourced from Moody's Analylics. Eslimates from 2010 to 2020 are sourced from the Census
Bureau's Population Estimates Program, which is based on the 201 0 Census and data on births, deaths, and migration. Annual population
estimates are shown in darker lines from 1990 to 2020. ln some jurisdiclions, the 2010-2020 estimales did not accurately reflect the actual
trend between the 201 0 and the 2020 Census periods. Where discrepancies occurred, a lighter dashed line from 201 0 to 2020 shows the
official lrend line between the decennial markers.
PAGE 20 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Figure 6. Housing Affordability, 2019
Share of housing units whose occupations spend more than 30 percent of household income on housing expenses
(i.e., rent or mortgage payments)
Kittitas Yakima
County, WA Counly, WA
I Owned Units
:Lewis County, Bozeman, MTr Washington
WA
I Rental Units
Ellensburg Douglas
city, WA County, WA
62.1%
United States I Grant County,:WA
Chelan
County, WA
56.8%
50.5% 50.0%49.6%47.7%44.8%
39.9%
34.6%31.4%
28.6%
I
3t.5t
I
28.6%
I
28.8%
I
29.0%
I
29.2%
I
,30.0%
I
29.7%
I
27.8%
I I
25.9%
I
Source(s): American Community Survey, 2019 5-year sample; TIP Strategies, lnc.
Figure 7. Texas Housing Affordability Index (THAI),2019
This index compares household median income to a typical mortgage payment on a median-priced home. A value of 'l
indicates the median income is exactly enough to purchase a median home. Values <1 indicate unaffordability, and
values >1 indicate sufficient affordability. Adjust inputs on the right side to modify the mortgage and median income.
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
THAI
0.7500 1.2500
Eqoo.=6
au>
F
Source(s): American Community Survey, 2019 5-year sample; TIP Slrategies, lnc.
Note(s): The THAI was adapted from the Texas A&M University Real Estate Center by TIP Strategies, lnc. Mortgage payments only include the
monthly payments on the loan (does not include insurance 0r tax paymenls). Down payment is the percentage of the home value paid before lhe
mortgage. Mortgage inleresl rate is the annual percenlage rate. Mortgage term is the length of the loan in years. Qualifying ratio is the maximum
debt-l0-income ratio thal still qualifies for a mortgage. Adiustment shifts the income used in the calculation where 100 percent is the median
household income.
s'r<
E=-
gor
co
EoNoo
.E=
.=>:<E
o(J
s=c*OE
oc)
co
ttr.g
aG
=
g5
oqo5o(J
.g <.
=B(l)-
E
=oc)
F<E=(9*
q
oc)
o36E
o
cc
=
o5o
o
6c:3
o€a!
o
oc
=
o
o
o
G
=
@o6rc
o
o
o36
o
o
O
oEo
c,
.clo-c'
o
Ig
d'(]
o
6g
=
PAGE 21 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Job growth in the County has primarily been in population-driven, low-wage sectors.
|n2020, four sectors accounted for more than one-half (52.6 percent) of alljobs in the County: education,
accommodation and food services, retail, and healthcare (Figure 8, page 22). Among these, the healthcare and
accommodation and food services sectors have grown the most over the past two decades, increasing
employment by more than 58 and 71 percent, respectively, between 2001 and 2019. While most sectors saw
slight employment declines in 2020 as a result of the pandemic recession, accommodation and food services
were hit particularly hard, shedding more than 500 jobs (or about 19 percent) in a single year. A review of
employment by occupation mirrors the industry data, with the largest four occupation groups in Kittitas County
closely tied to the largest sectors: food preparers and servers, office and administrative support workers, sales
workers, and educational instruction workers. A surge of transportation workers-a net total increase of more
lhan 220 jobs since 201 S-reflects the growth of the transportation industry generally, as well as increased
demand for retail and courier services in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Although the transportation industry in
Kittitas County is relatively small (less than 400 jobs in 2O2O), it grew by a substanlial249 percent in 2020 (an
addition of about 70 jobs).
Figure 8. 2020 Employment by lndustry Sector: Kittitas County, Washington
Education
Accommodation & food services
Retail trade
Healthcare
Construction
Agriculture
Personal & other services
Local government
Wholesale trade
Manufacturing
Administrative services
Professional services
Transportation & warehousing
Property sales & leasing
state government
Finance & insurance
lnformation & media
Arts, entertainment, & recreation
Federal government (military)
Federal government (civilian)
Utilities
Oil, gas, & mining
Regional & corporate operations
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Source(s): US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS); Emsi Burning Glass 202'1.4-Quarte;T:r.r, of Emptoyment and Wages (Qcrw;
Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, and Self-Employed; TIP Strategies, lnc.
PAGE22I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
More workers commute out of the County than in.
Kittitas County tends to be a net exporter of workers to jobs outside of the County (Figure 9, page 23). tn other
words, more workers commute out of the County for work (8,100 in 2019) than commute into the County for work
(6,400 in 2019). However, the largest group of commuters are those who live and work in the County (nearly
10,000 people in 2019, or about 54 percent of employed County residents). Among those living and working in the
County, almost two-thirds (62 percent) work in Ellensburg and another quarter (24.6 percent) work in
unincorporated parts of the County. By comparison, these same residents tend to live in either Ellensburg (45.5
percent) or in unincorporated Kittitas County (41.5 percent). While most occupations show a net outflow of
commuters leaving the County for wor( an analysis by monthly earnings shows that workers earning less than
51,25t per month tend to commute into Kittitas County for work. This aligns with the high cost of living in Kittitas
County as lower-earning workers likely struggle to afford housing in the County.
Figure 9. Commuting Trends to Kittitas County, Washington, 2008 to 2019
Commuting into the region means a person lives outside of the region and works inside of the region. Commuting
out of the region means a person lives inside of the region and works outside of the region.
8,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Source(s): Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD), 0rigin-Deslinalion Employment Statistics (L0DES); TtP Strategies, lnc.
Note(s): 0nly includes residents and workers in Washinglon and ldaho.
6,000
4,000
2,000
o
=l!
==(to
-2,000
-4,000
-6,000
-8,000
o
F
o
lrih
==o(t
n
0
rto(.|d
\t
C\ltt
d
(9
m
.d
\o$l0
to
oo\al)
ro
rrtiOt-
u)
0roNrt
o
c,t
rn
o
f?,
ln
$Ndr$
6Nord
C!
t
.f'
(t
(Yt\o
d €(tro
od
(3(tr
@
Fi
oa-
c)\o
a.F
\o
<)rt,
Fa
c{.d
ro
C.lo
Fi
Foo-
a\
ro(t!d
<tFlo.d
$t\i<t.d
PAGE 23 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
CWU inf{uenees ffte Sounfy's demographie composf tion and piays an essefl?fiaf rofe in ifs currenf
and fu{ure eocnomy.
ln addition to its role as an economic anchor, the presence of CWU is reflected in the area's demographics. The
associated student population provides a source of greater racial and ethnic diversity and translates to a younger-
than-average population, particularly in Ellensburg where two-thirds of residents are under 35 years old. CWU also
influences educational attainment and income levels. Educational attainment is generally high in Kittitas County
and is on par with the state and the nation, with about one-third (32 percent) of residents 25 years or older holding
a bachelor's degree or higher (Figure 10, page 24). However, at first glance, higher education seems to have not
translated into higher wages as the median household income for the County and for Ellensburg are below state
and national levels (Figure 1 1, page 25). This finding, in part, reflects the region's high population of student
residents. Students tend to report low incomes because few are able to be full-time employees and full-time
students simultaneously. (This same student-influenced phenomenon is shown in poverty rates where both
Kittitas County and Ellensburg exceed comparisons.) Going forward, leveraging CWU will be important piece of
talent attraction, retention efforts.
Figure 10. Educational Attainment, 20'19
Population 25 years and older by share of educational attainment.
Bozeman, MT
Ellensburg city, WA
Washington
Kittitas County, WA
United States
Chelan County, WA
Douglas County, WA
Grant County, WA
Lewis County, WA
Yakima County, WA
32.5V"17.6y,
24.50/"13.6%
22.40/'13.6%
22.1?o 10.2%
19.8%12.4V,
15.6% 10.1%
13.4"/0 7.1Uo
Graduate degree
Bachelor's degree
i:1 Associate's degree
I Some college
I High school
I Less than high school
12.3V" 5.4Vo
11.0V" 6.7!0
10.17" 6.5%
907" 100%\yo 10vo 20"/.307, 400/" 50% 600/o 70y"
PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION 25+
80?o
Source(s): American Community Survey, 2019 5-year sample; TIP Strategies, lnc.
Note(s): Educational attainment only measured for population 25 and older. High school includes equivalency. Some college indicates n0
degree was received. Graduate deqree includes professional degrees and doctoral pr0grams.
22.9%17.8oA
8,4o/o 20.3V0 24.lvo
B 7V,22.0%23.39"
8.696 24.9V"26.60/.
20.AVo12.l\o 27.0o/"
29.8"417.4%26.4%
17.9"/o 29.6V.21.7V0
23.3V"27.2%23.1%
28.Toh12.5%29.1?"
26.3Vo 28.\yo 20.7%
PAGE 24 I EEONOMIC DHVELOPMEI'IT STRA TEGIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUI'ITY, WASHINGTON
Figure 11. Median Household lncomg 2019
$73.8l(
366.{K
$63.0K $52.8K
$58.8r(
$5s.6l(
s53.5r(
co
6
.€E
I
F
c6
EoNo€
=*
.6
Eo
ur
=*
EIoc)
d
.E
=*
c
o(J
'i
oJ
=*
C
o(J
Ect
=FC
oc)
oE
f,u
B
Et
CJ
6o
o
o
a6E
c
=
=*
otJ
o6pod
Source(s): American Community Survey, 20'19 S-year sample; TIP Stra.iegies, lnc.
PAGE 25 I ECONOMIC DEVETOPMENT STRATESIC PLAN
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SW0T Analysis
During the initial phases of the project, the consulting team gathered qualitative input from local stakeholders in
Kittitas County concerning local economic development issues. ln addition, TIP conducted quantitative data
analyses to understand the County's competitive position in the region. The results of these efforts informed the
following strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. The four components of a SWOT
analysis can be defined as follows.
. Strengths: Assets and resources that can be built on to grow, strengthen, and diversify the local/regional economy
. Weaknesses: Liabilities and barriers to economic development that could limit economic growth potential.
. Opportunities: Competitive advantages and positive trends that hold significant potential for the attraction of
new businesses, investments, and skilled workers.
r Threats: Unfavorable factors and trends (often external) that could negatively affect the local/regional economy
Figure 12. Summary of Kittitas County SW0T Analysis
.4_Li Strengths +Weaknesses
. Outdoor recrealion assets and activitiesr Presence of Central Washington University. Natural resources. Central geographic location within the state. Small town/rural character. High quality of place. Natural beauty. Strong healthcare sector employment. Growing tourism sector. Educated workforcer lnternational market for Timothy hay. Economic development tools
. lnfraslructure investment. Snoqualmie Pass. 0utdoor recreation as a magnet for talent attractionr Attraction of remote workers. Expansion of research and facilities at CWU. Cohesivetourism effortr New recreational facilities (e.9., indool community center). Community planning
o Recreation*elated business attraction. Entrepreneurship and small business developmenl. Growth of outdoor recreation sector (e.9., apparel, food,
equipment, etc.). Light manufacturing. Suncadia network. Biomass
Source(s): TIP Strategies, lnc
. Lack of a unified County vision for economic development. Housing affordability and lack of inventory. Few industrial and commercial development-ready sites. Disconnect between CWU and community/private sector. No port district. Underinvestment in infrastructure (lransportation,
water/wastewater, etc.). Retail sales tax leakage. Anti-growthsentiment. Lack of higher-wage employment opportunitiesr Perception of water scarcity. Siloed economic development effortsr Lack of indoor and family-friendly amenities/activities. Lack of childcare options
. Loss ofyoung talent. Population growth without accompanying higher-wage
employment growthr Aging population. Lack offorest management. Wildfire risk. lnability to altract new private investment. Lower state funding levels for CWU. Planning and zoning barriers to new investment
o Agriculture becoming less sustainable
o Encroachment of residential development on farming lands
r*oF2 Opportunities Threats
PAGE 26 I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PIAN