HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution_DOE Covenant_Lower Co ShopKITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
2022 AGENDA STAFF REPORT
AGENDA DATE: February 15, 2022
ACTION REQUESTED: Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing Chair
Signature on the Washington State Department of Ecology
Restrictive Covenant at the Lower County Public Works
Maintenance Shop
BACKGROUND: Groundwater monitoring for petroleum hydrocarbon
contamination at Lower County Public Works Maintenance
Shop concluded in 2021. It is now time to record the
requested restrictive covenant on the property. The soil
cleanup will take place once the existing shop is ready for
demolition.
INTERACTION: Public Works.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chair’s signature on the restrictive covenant
requested by the Washington State Department of Ecology.
HANDLING: Return one original to Public Works.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; Restrictive Covenant.
LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
R E S O L U T I O N
NO. ___________
AUTHORIZING CHAIR SIGNATURE ON WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTRICTIVE COVENANT ON TAX PARCEL NO.
763133 LOWER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SHOP
WHEREAS: Kittitas County Public Works conducted a Phase II environmental assessment of
the Lower County Maintenance Shop property in July 2013; and
WHEREAS: The environmental assessment identified the presence of petroleum impacted soils
on a portion of the site; and
WHEREAS: In 2016 Public Works voluntarily authorized groundwater monitoring at the Lower
County shop and said monitoring continued until 2021; and
WHEREAS: Groundwater monitoring results affirm no additional monitoring is required and it
is now time to address site contaminated soils; and
WHEREAS: Washington State Department of Ecology allows the recording of a restrictive
environmental covenant on the property until such time that the contaminated
soil can be removed from the site;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: The Board of County Commissioners, after due
consideration, does hereby authorize the Chair’s signature on an environmental restrictive
covenant on Tax Parcel Number 763133.
DATED this 15th day of February 2022, at Ellensburg, Washington.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
________________________________
Laura Osiadacz, Chairman
Attest:
☐ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik ______________________________
Cory Wright, Vice-Chairman
☐ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz
_______________________________ _______________________________
Brett Wachsmith, Commissioner
After Recording Return
Original Signed Covenant to:
Mr. Jeff Newschwander
Toxics Cleanup Program
Department of Ecology,
Central Region
1250 West Alder Street
Union Gap, WA 98903
Environmental Covenant
Grantor: Kittitas County, WA
Grantee: State of Washington, Department of Ecology (hereafter “Ecology”)
Brief Legal Description: Tract 4
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 21, TACOMA ADDITION TO
THE CITY OF ELLENSBURG, in the County of Kittitas, State of Washington, as per plat
thereof recorded in Book 1 of Plats, page 57 records of said County.
Tax Parcel Nos.: 763133
Cross Reference: Kittitas County Lower Shop, 505 West 14th Ave, Ellensburg, WA 98926
File No. 0504-119-00
RECITALS 1
a. This document is an environmental (restrictive) covenant (hereafter “Covenant”) executed
pursuant to the Model Toxics Control Act (“MTCA”), chapter 70.105D RCW, and Uniform
Environmental Covenants Act (“UECA”), chapter 64.70 RCW.
b. The Property that is the subject of this Covenant is part or all of a site commonly known
as Kittitas County Lower Shop (ID Number 0504-119-00). The Property is legally described in
Exhibit A, and illustrated in Exhibit B, both of which are attached (hereafter “Property”). If there
are differences between these two Exhibits, the legal description in Exhibit A shall prevail.
c. The Property is the subject of remedial action conducted under MTCA. This Covenant is
required because residual contamination remains on the Property after completion of remedial
actions. Specifically, the following principal contaminants remain on the Property:
Medium Principal Contaminants Present
Soil Petroleum hu from an abandoned onsite fuel tank
d. It is the purpose of this Covenant to restrict certain activities and uses of the Property to
protect human health and the environment and the integrity of remedial actions conducted at the
site. Records describing the extent of residual contamination and remedial actions conducted are
available through Ecology. Voluntary monitoring reports conducted by GEOENGINEERS are
attached as EXHIBIT E to this document.
e. This Covenant grants Ecology certain rights under UECA and as specified in this
Covenant. As a Holder of this Covenant under UECA, Ecology has an interest in real property,
however, this is not an ownership interest which equates to liability under MTCA or the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et
seq. The rights of Ecology as an “agency” under UECA, other than its’ right as a holder, are not
an interest in real property.
COVENANT
Kittitas County, WA, as Grantor and fee simple owner of the Property hereby grants to the
Washington State Department of Ecology, and its successors and assignees, the following
covenants. Furthermore, it is the intent of the Grantor that such covenants shall supersede any
prior interests the GRANTOR has in the property and run with the land and be binding on all
current and future owners of any portion of, or interest in, the Property.
Section 1. General Restrictions and Requirements.
The following general restrictions and requirements shall apply to the Property:
a. Interference with Remedial Action. The Grantor shall not engage in any activity on the
Property that may impact or interfere with the remedial action and any operation, maintenance,
inspection or monitoring of that remedial action without prior written approval from Ecology.
b. Protection of Human Health and the Environment. The Grantor shall not engage in
any activity on the Property that may threaten continued protection of human health or the
environment without prior written approval from Ecology. This includes, but is not limited to, any
activity that results in the release of residual contamination that was contained as a part of the
remedial action or that exacerbates or creates a new exposure to residual contamination remaining
on the Property.
c. Continued Compliance Required. Grantor shall not convey any interest in any portion
of the Property without providing for the continued adequate and complete operation,
maintenance and monitoring of remedial actions and continued compliance with this Covenant.
d. Leases. Grantor shall restrict any lease for any portion of the Property to uses and
activities consistent with this Covenant and notify all lessees of the restrictions on the use of the
Property.
e. Preservation of Reference Monuments. Grantor shall make a good faith effort to
preserve any reference monuments and boundary markers used to define the areal extent of
coverage of this Covenant. Should a monument or marker be damaged or destroyed, Grantor
shall have it replaced by a licensed professional surveyor within 30 days of discovery of the
damage or destruction.
Section 2. Specific Prohibitions and Requirements.
In addition to the general restrictions in Section 1 of this Covenant, the following additional
specific restrictions and requirements shall apply to the Property.
b. Containment of soil/waste materials.
Section 3. Access.
a. The Grantor shall maintain clear access to all remedial action components necessary to
construct, operate, inspect, monitor and maintain the remedial action.
b. The Grantor freely and voluntarily grants Ecology and its authorized representatives, upon
reasonable notice, the right to enter the Property at reasonable times to evaluate the effectiveness
of this Covenant and associated remedial actions, and enforce compliance with this Covenant and
those actions, including the right to take samples, inspect any remedial actions conducted on the
Property, and to inspect related records.
c. No right of access or use by a third party to any portion of the Property is conveyed by this
instrument.
Section 4. Notice Requirements.
a. Conveyance of Any Interest. The Grantor, when conveying any interest to Kittitas County
tax parcel number 763133, including but not limited to title, easement, leases, and security or other
interests, must:
i. Provide written notice to Ecology of the intended conveyance at least thirty (30) days
in advance of the conveyance.
ii. Include in the conveying document a notice in substantially the following form, as well
as a complete copy of this Covenant:
NOTICE: THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL
COVENANT GRANTED TO THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY ON FEBRUARY 15, 2022 AND RECORDED WITH THE KITTITAS
COUNTY AUDITOR UNDER RECORDING NUMBER _______________.
USES AND ACTIVITIES ON THIS PROPERTY MUST COMPLY WITH THAT
COVENANT, A COMPLETE COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THIS
DOCUMENT.
iii. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by Ecology, provide Ecology with a complete
copy of the executed document within thirty (30) days of the date of execution of such
document.
b. Reporting Violations. Should the Grantor become aware of any violation of this
Covenant, Grantor shall promptly report such violation in writing to Ecology.
c. Emergencies. For any emergency or significant change in site conditions due to Acts of
Nature (for example, flood or fire) resulting in a violation of this Covenant, the Grantor is
authorized to respond to such an event in accordance with state and federal law. The Grantor
must notify Ecology in writing of the event and response actions planned or taken as soon as
practical but no later than within 24 hours of the discovery of the event.
d. Notification procedure. Any required written notice, approval, reporting or other
communication shall be personally delivered or sent by first class mail to the following persons.
Any change in this contact information shall be submitted in writing to all parties to this
Covenant. Upon mutual agreement of the parties to this Covenant, an alternative to personal
delivery or first class mail, such as e-mail or other electronic means, may be used for these
communications.
Kittitas County
Board of Commissioners
205 W 5th AVE STE 108
Ellensburg WA 98926-2887
509-962-7508
509-962-7679 fax
bocc@co.kittitas.wa.us
Environmental Covenants Coordinator
Washington State Department of Ecology
Toxics Cleanup Program
P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504 – 7600
(360) 407-6000
ToxicsCleanupProgramHQ@ecy.wa.gov
Section 5. Modification or Termination.
a. Grantor must provide written notice and obtain approval from Ecology at least sixty (60)
days in advance of any proposed activity or use of the Property in a manner that is inconsistent
with this Covenant. For any proposal that is inconsistent with this Covenant and permanently
modifies an activity or use restriction at the site:
i. Ecology must issue a public notice and provide an opportunity for the public to
comment on the proposal; and
ii. If Ecology approves of the proposal, the Covenant must be amended to reflect the
change before the activity or use can proceed.
b. If the conditions at the site requiring a Covenant have changed or no longer exist, then the
Grantor may submit a request to Ecology that this Covenant be amended or terminated. Any
amendment or termination of this Covenant must follow the procedures in MTCA and UECA and
any rules promulgated under these chapters.
Section 6. Enforcement and Construction.
a. This Covenant is being freely and voluntarily granted by the Grantor.
b. Within ten (10) days of execution of this Covenant, Grantor shall provide Ecology with
an original signed Covenant and proof of recording and a copy of the Covenant and proof of
recording to others required by RCW 64.70.070.
c. Ecology shall be entitled to enforce the terms of this Covenant by resort to specific
performance or legal process. All remedies available in this Covenant shall be in addition to any
and all remedies at law or in equity, including MTCA and UECA. Enforcement of the terms of
this Covenant shall be at the discretion of Ecology, and any forbearance, delay or omission to
exercise its rights under this Covenant in the event of a breach of any term of this Covenant is
not a waiver by Ecology of that term or of any subsequent breach of that term, or any other term
in this Covenant, or of any rights of Ecology under this Covenant.
d. The Grantor shall be responsible for all costs associated with implementation of this
Covenant. Furthermore, the Grantor, upon request by Ecology, shall be obligated to pay for
Ecology’s costs to process a request for any modification or termination of this Covenant and
any approval required by this Covenant.
e. This Covenant shall be liberally construed to meet the intent of MTCA and UECA.
f. The provisions of this Covenant shall be severable. If any provision in this Covenant or
its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Covenant or its
application to any person or circumstance is not affected and shall continue in full force and
effect as though such void provision had not been contained herein.
g. A heading used at the beginning of any section or paragraph or exhibit of this Covenant
may be used to aid in the interpretation of that section or paragraph or exhibit but does not
override the specific requirements in that section or paragraph.
The undersigned Grantor warrants he/she holds the title to Kittitas County tax parcel number
763133, and has authority to execute this Covenant.
EXECUTED this ______ day of __________________, 20___.
_______________________
by: Laura Osiadacz
Title: Chairman, Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners
REPRESENTATIVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On this day of , 20__, I certify that
personally appeared before me, acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated
that he/she was authorized to execute this instrument, and acknowledged it as the
_________________________ Chairman of the Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the
instrument.
__________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing at ________________________________
My appointment expires _____________________
The Department of Ecology, hereby accepts the status as GRANTEE and HOLDER of
the above Environmental Covenant.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
______________________
by: ___________________
Title: ______________________________
Dated: _____________________________
STATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On this day of , 20__, I certify that ___________________________
personally appeared before me, acknowledged that he/she is the
of the state agency that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and signed said instrument by
free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that
he/she was authorized to execute said instrument for said state agency.
__________________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing at ________________________________
My appointment expires ______________________
Exhibit A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Tract 4
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 21, TACOMA ADDITION TO
THE CITY OF ELLENSBURG, in the County of Kittitas, State of Washington, as per plat
thereof recorded in Book 1 of Plats, page 57 records of said County.
Exhibit B
PROPERTY MAP
Exhibit C
MAP ILLUSTRATING LOCATION OF RESTRICTIONS
Notes:
1.The locations of all features shown are approximate.
2.This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.
3.GRPH = Gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons; µg/L = micrograms per liter
Data Source: Aerial image from ESRI Data Online.
Legend
@<Previous Boring Numberand Approximate Location
@ÑBoring Number andApproximate Location
Inferred Ground Elevation Contours (feet)January 29, 2019
Inferred GroundwaterFlow Direction
Former UST Approximate Location(Terragraphics 2013)
Existing Monitoring WellsApproximate LocationMonitoring Wells Installed byGeoEngineers (March 2017)Approximate Location
P:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F02_GW_Jan2019.mxd Date Exported: 02/25/19 by maugust
@<
@<
@<
@Ñ@Ñ
@Ñ
@Ñ
@Ñ@Ñ@Ñ
W 15th Ave
N Okanogan StIDWStorage
MW-21573.38
1571
1
5
7
3
1572
1570
!
MW-31,573.16
MW-11,573.84
MW-41,572.29
MW-51,569.84
MW-61,571.49
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
B-7
BH-24
BH-25
BH-26
Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
Site Plan and January 2019
Groundwater Elevations
Kittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, Washington
Figure 2
µ
60 0 60
Feet
GRPH
(µg/L)
MW-1 <150
MW-2 <150
MW-3 <150
MW-4 <150
MW-5 <150
MW-6 <150
Chemical Analytical Results
Well ID
Exhibit D
VICINITY MAP
µ
SITE
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
Kittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, Washington
2,000 2,0000
Feet
Data Source: Mapbox Open Street Map, 2016
Notes:1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.
Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
P:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F01_VM.mxd Date Exported: 10/25/16 by ccabrera
Exhibit E
GEOENGINEERS MONITORING REPORTS
Data Gap Investigation
Model Remedy Lust Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
for
Washington State Department of Ecology
December 29, 2016
Data Gap Investigation
Model Remedy LUST Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
for
Washington State Department of Ecology
December 29, 2016
523 East Second Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99202
509.363.3125
Data Gap Investigation
Model Remedy LUST Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
File No. 0504-119-00
December 29, 2016
Prepared for:
Washington State Department of Ecology
Toxics Cleanup Program - Central Region Office
1250 West Alder Street
Union Gap, Washington 98903
Attention: Jeff Newschwander
Prepared by:
GeoEngineers, Inc.
523 East Second Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99202
509.363.3125
Andrew P. Provant
Senior Geologist
Bruce D. Williams
Principal
APP:SHL:BDW:tjh
H. Lathen,
Environmental Engineer
Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy ofthe original document (email, text, table, and/orfigure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy
ofthe original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record.
GEOENGINEER�
December 29, 2016 | Page i File No. 0504-119-00
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 1
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................................................................................................................... 1
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................ 2
4.1. General ........................................................................................................................................................ 2
4.2. Subsurface Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 3
4.3. Field Screening and Sampling ................................................................................................................... 3
5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 3
5.1. Soil Chemical Analytical Results ................................................................................................................ 3
6.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 5
7.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Field Procedures and Boring Logs
Figure A-1 – Key to Exploration Logs
Figures A-2 through A-4 – Logs of Borings
Appendix B. Chemical Analytical Laboratory Reports
Appendix C. Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
December 29, 2016 | Page 1 File No. 0504-119-00
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes soil and groundwater assessment activities conducted at the Kittitas County Lower
Shop site located at 505 West 14th Avenue in Ellensburg, Washington (herein referred to as “site”). The
approximate site location is shown in the attached Vicinity Map, Figure 1.
Site environmental activities are managed by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). This
report describes field activities, observations and chemical analytical results associated with soil and
groundwater samples collected at the site. The purpose of the assessment activities described herein was
to identify if remnant soil and groundwater contamination associated with former underground storage tank
(UST) operation was present beneath the site. Ecology will use the assessment results to conduct a Site
Hazard Assessment (SHA), if necessary, or close the site.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The county shop is located in a residential area of Ellensburg, Washington. The approximate site location
is shown in the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The site is bounded by 15th Avenue to the north, 14th Avenue to the
south, residential property to the west and Okanogan Street to the east. Four maintenance or shop buildings
and a yard are located on the unpaved site.
In May 1990, Kittitas County removed three USTs from the site just north of the office building. Evidence
of a petroleum release was not recorded during UST removal actions; however, analytical testing was not
performed. TerraGraphics completed a Phase II environmental site assessment in July 2013, and
encountered petroleum-impacted soil near the former UST basin in three borings. The approximate
locations of the former USTs and borings are shown in the Site Plan, Figure 2. The soil samples collected
at about 5 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the three 2013 borings exceeded the Model Toxics Control
Act (MTCA) Method A cleanup levels for gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons (GRPH), total xylenes,
ethylbenzene, and naphthalene.
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services included the following:
1. Prepared a Master Work Plan that included a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP), Quality Assurance
Project Plan (QAPP), and Health and Safety Plan (HASP).
2. Coordinated underground utility locating using the one-call system and Utilities Plus, a private utility
locator. Per state regulations, the proposed boring locations were marked prior to initiating the locate
request.
3. Coordinated subcontractors (drillers, locators and waste disposal contractors) and provided project
management services.
4. Conducted field assessment activities including the following:
a. Observing Environmental West Explorations, Inc. (Environmental West) drill seven soil
borings (B-1 through B-7) using direct-push drilling techniques. Temporary well screens
December 29, 2016 | Page 2 File No. 0504-119-00
were set in four of the borings to collect groundwater samples. Continuous soil samples
were collected using 4-foot-long acrylic slip-sleeve samplers.
b. Collecting four groundwater samples from borings B-1 through B-3, and B-5.
c. Observing and documenting subsurface soil conditions. At least one soil sample was
retained from each slip-sleeve sampler for field screening and potential chemical analysis.
Field screening consisted of photo-ionization detector (PID) screening, visual observation
and water-sheen testing.
d. Drumming and labeling investigation-derived waste (IDW).
5. Submitting one soil sample from each boring to TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (TestAmerica) for
chemical analysis. The soil sample with the greatest field screening indication of potential
contamination or the sample collected from the bottom of the boring was submitted for chemical
analysis. Soil samples were submitted for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes and
naphthalene (BTEXN) using EPA Method 8260C; GRPH using Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx, and diesel-
and oil-range petroleum hydrocarbons (DRPH and ORPH, respectively) using Northwest Method
NWTPH-Dx.
6. Submitting four groundwater samples for BTEXN, GRPH, DRPH and ORPH analysis using the methods
listed above.
7. Entering analytical data into Ecology’s Environmental Information Management (EIM) database.
8. Preparing this assessment report.
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
4.1. General
Field assessment activities were conducted on December 2, 2016. Site utilities, located near the boring
locations, were identified and marked by Utilities Plus prior to drilling. Environmental West advanced seven
borings (B-1 through B-7) near and within the former UST excavation using direct-push drilling methods.
The direct-push boring locations are summarized by the following:
■ Soil boring B-1 was drilled at the northwestern corner of the former UST excavation to 10½ feet bgs
before meeting refusal. Three soil samples for potential chemical analysis were collected from the
2-, 4½- and 9-foot-depth intervals for potential chemical analysis. Groundwater was encountered at
about 8 feet bgs. A temporary well screen was set between 7½ and 9½ feet bgs, and a groundwater
sample was collected.
■ Soil boring B-2 was drilled approximately 8 feet north of the former UST excavation. B-2 was advanced
to a depth of 9 feet bgs before meeting refusal. Soil samples were collected at the 2-, 4½- and 8-foot-
depth intervals for potential chemical analysis. Groundwater was encountered at about 4½ feet bgs. A
temporary well screen was set between 4 and 6 feet bgs, and a groundwater sample was collected.
■ Soil boring B-3 was drilled approximately 25 feet north of the former UST excavation. B-3 was advanced
to a depth of 8½ feet bgs before meeting refusal. Soil samples were obtained at the 3½-, 6½- and
8-foot-depth intervals for potential chemical analysis. Groundwater was encountered at about 8 feet
December 29, 2016 | Page 3 File No. 0504-119-00
bgs. A temporary well screen was set between 6½ and 8½ feet bgs, and a groundwater sample was
collected.
■ Soil boring B-4 was drilled approximately 25 feet northwest of the former UST excavation. B-4 was
advanced to a depth of 8½ feet bgs before meeting refusal, and soil samples collected at the 3- and
6-foot-depth intervals for potential chemical analysis. Groundwater was not encountered.
■ Soil boring B-5 was drilled approximately 10 feet northeast of the former UST excavation. B-5 was
advanced to a depth of 9 feet bgs before meeting refusal. Soil samples were collected at the
1½-, 4½- and 8-foot-depth intervals for potential chemical analysis. Groundwater was encountered at
about 7½ feet bgs. A temporary well screen was set between 7 and 9 feet bgs, and a groundwater
sample was collected.
■ Soil boring B-6 was drilled approximately 20 feet east of the former UST excavation. B-6 was advanced
to a depth of 9½ feet bgs before meeting refusal. Soil samples were collected at the 3-, 6- and
8-foot-depth intervals for potential chemical analysis. Groundwater was not encountered.
■ Soil boring B-7 was drilled approximately 20 feet northwest of the former UST excavation. B-7 was
advanced to a depth of 8 feet bgs before meeting refusal. Soil samples were collected at the 2- and
6-foot-depth intervals for potential chemical analysis. Groundwater was not encountered.
Environmental West backfilled each boring with bentonite. Excess soil cuttings and temporary well purge
water were removed and disposed by Environmental West. Boring logs associated with the borings are
included in Appendix A.
4.2. Subsurface Conditions
Observed soil conditions varied within the borings with clay with sand, silty sand, silty gravel, fine to coarse
gravel with silt, clay with gravel, and silt with sand encountered. In general, coarse material (sand and
gravel) was present in most borings to depths between 2 and 5 feet bgs and underlain by fine materials
(clay and silt) to the depths explored. Groundwater was encountered in four borings between 4½ and 8 feet
bgs.
4.3. Field Screening and Sampling
Soil samples from each boring were field-screened for the potential presence of petroleum contamination
by PID, visual examination and water-sheen testing. PID headspace vapor readings were measured above
1 part per million (ppm) in borings B-1, B-2 and B-5. Contaminated soil field screening indicators were also
observed in collected soil samples from borings B-1, B-2 and B-5. A slight to moderate sheen was noted,
as well as, a slight petroleum odor. Field screening procedures are further described in Appendix A.
One soil sample per slip-sleeve sampler was collected in laboratory-supplied containers for chemical
analysis. Soil and groundwater sampling procedures also are described in Appendix A.
5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.1. Soil Chemical Analytical Results
Seven soil samples were submitted to TestAmerica for the chemical analyses described in “Section 3.0
Scope of Services.” Submitted samples from the seven borings were collected between 4 and 8 feet bgs.
December 29, 2016 | Page 4 File No. 0504-119-00
TestAmerica’s laboratory report is included in Appendix B; chemical analytical results are summarized and
compared to MTCA Method A cleanup levels for unrestricted land use in Summary of Chemical Analytical
Results – Soil, Tables 1 and 2.
BTEX constituents were not reported greater than the laboratory method reporting limits in five of the soil
samples submitted (from borings B-3 through B-7); however, the benzene reporting limits for the soil
samples collected from borings B-4 and B-6 were greater than the MTCA Method A cleanup levels. GRPH
was detected greater than reporting limits in the sample collected from B-5 and DRPH and ORPH were
detected above the laboratory method reporting limits in borings B-1 and B-3, but reported concentrations
did not exceed the MTCA Method A cleanup levels. Benzene concentrations in the sample collected from
boring B-1 and GRPH concentrations in the samples collected from borings B-1 and B-2 exceeded the
respective MTCA Method A cleanup levels.
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS – SOIL (BTEXN)
Sample
Identification
Date
Sampled Units Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m,p-Xylene o-Xylene Total Xylenes Naphthalene Site-3:B-
1(4.5-4.75)
12/02/16 mg/kg <0.10 0.61 <0.51 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0
Site-3:B-
2(4.5-4.75)
12/02/16 mg/kg 0.032 <0.14 <0.14 <0.55 <0.28 <0.83 <0.28
Site-3:B-
3(6.5-6.75)
12/02/16 mg/kg <0.030 <0.15 <0.15 <0.60 <0.30 <0.90 <0.30
Site-3:B-4
(6-6.25)
12/02/16 mg/kg <0.031 <0.16 <0.16 <0.62 <0.31 <0.93 <0.31
Site-3:B-5
(4.75-5)
12/02/16 mg/kg <0.023 <0.12 <0.12 <0.46 <0.23 <0.70 <0.23
Site-3:B-6
(8-8.25)
12/02/16 mg/kg <0.023 <0.12 <0.12 <0.46 <0.23 <0.70 <0.23
Site-3: B-7
(6-6.25)
12/02/16 mg/kg <0.033 <0.16 <0.16 <0.66 <0.33 <0.99 <0.33
MTCA Method A CUL1 mg/kg 0.03 7 6 -- -- 9 5
Notes:
1MTCA Method A CUL - Washington State Model Toxics Control Act Method A unrestricted land use cleanup level
mg/kg – milligrams per kilogram
Bold - Analyte concentrations are greater than the laboratory method reporting limit.
Yellow Highlight – Analyte concentrations exceeds MTCA Method A cleanup level.
December 29, 2016 | Page 5 File No. 0504-119-00
TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS – SOIL (TPH)
Sample
Identification
Date
Sampled
GRPH1
(mg/kg)
DRPH2
(mg/kg)
ORPH2
(mg/kg)
Site-3: B-1 (4.5-4.75) 12/02/16 250 160 35
Site-3: B-2 (4.5-4.75) 12/02/16 46 17 <29
Site-3: B-3 (6.5-6.75) 12/02/16 <7.5 <12 <31
Site-3: B-4 (6-6.5) 12/02/16 <7.8 <13 <33
Site-3: B-5 (4.75-5) 12/02/16 0.64 <11 <28
Site-3: B-6 (8-8.25) 12/02/16 <5.8 <12 <29
Site-3: B-7 (6-6.25) 12/02/16 <8.2 <13 <33
MTCA Method A CUL3 30/1004 2,000 2,000
Notes:
1GRPH analyzed using Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx.
2DRPH analyzed using Northwest Method NWTPH-Dx.
3MTCA Method A CUL - Washington State Model Toxics Control Act Method A unrestricted land use cleanup level
4Cleanup level for gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons is 100 mg/kg if benzene is not detected and the total concentrations of
ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes are less than 1 percent of the gasoline mixture; otherwise the cleanup level is 30 mg/kg.
Bold - Analyte concentrations are greater than the laboratory method reporting limit.
Yellow Highlight – Analyte concentrations exceeds MTCA Method A cleanup level.
5.2. Groundwater Chemical Analytical Results
Four groundwater samples were submitted from the borings to TestAmerica for the chemical analyses
described in “Section 3.0 Scope of Services.” TestAmerica’s laboratory report is included in Appendix B;
chemical analytical results are summarized and compared to MTCA Method A cleanup levels for
unrestricted land use in Summary of Chemical Analytical Results – Groundwater, Tables 3 and 4.
GRPH, DRPH and ORPH concentrations exceeded the MTCA Method A cleanup level in the groundwater
sample collected from boring B-1 groundwater. Although each groundwater sample collected from the other
three temporary wells contained detectable concentrations of BTEXN, GRPH, DRPH and/or ORPH, none of
those concentrations exceeded cleanup criteria.
December 29, 2016 | Page 6 File No. 0504-119-00
TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS – GROUNDWATER (BTEXN)
Sample Identification Date Sampled Units Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m,p-Xylene o-Xylene Total Xylenes Naphthalene Site-3:B-1:120216 12/02/16 µg/L 0.76 3.0 1.9 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 8.8
Site-3:B-2:120216 12/02/16 µg/L 2.3 <1.0 2.3 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 <2.0
Site-3:B-3:120216 12/02/16 µg/L <0.20 2.9 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 <2.0
Site-3:B-5:120216 12/02/16 µg/L <0.20 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 <2.0
MTCA Method A CUL1 µg/L 5 1,000 700 -- -- 1,000 160
Notes:
1MTCA Method A CUL - Washington State Model Toxics Control Act Method A unrestricted land use cleanup level
µg/L – Micrograms per liter
Bold - Analyte concentrations are greater than the laboratory method reporting limit.
TABLE 4. SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS – GROUNDWATER (TPH)
Sample
Identification Date Sampled
GRPH1
(µg/L)
DRPH2
(mg/L)
ORPH2
(mg/L)
Site-3:B-1:120216 12/02/16 1,900 9.6 0.83
Site-3:B-2:120216 12/02/16 270 0.19 <0.22
Site-3:B-3:120216 12/02/16 <100 <0.13 0.41
Site-3:B-5:120216 12/02/16 <100 <0.13 0.28
MTCA Method A CUL3 1,000/8004 0.5 0.5
Notes:
1GRPH analyzed using Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx.
2DRPH analyzed using Northwest Method NWTPH-Dx.
3MTCA Method A CUL - Washington State Model Toxics Control Act Method A unrestricted land use cleanup level
4Cleanup level for gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons is 1,000 µg/l if benzene is not detected and the total concentrations of
ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylenes are less than 1 percent of the gasoline mixture; otherwise the cleanup level is 800 µg/l.
mg/L = milligrams per liter
Bold - Analyte concentrations are greater than the laboratory method reporting limit.
Yellow Highlight – Analyte concentrations exceeds MTCA Method A cleanup level.
6.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Soil and groundwater assessment activities were conducted December 2, 2016 at the Kittitas County Lower
Shop site located at 505 West 14th Avenue in Ellensburg, Washington. Seven soil borings (B-1 through B-7)
were advanced with depths ranging between 8 and 10½ feet bgs. Observed soil generally consisted of
shallow sand and gravel underlain by silt and/or clay and included clay with sand, silty sand, silty gravel,
fine to coarse gravel with silt, clay with gravel, and silt with sand. Groundwater was encountered in the
borings between 4½ and 8 feet bgs.
One soil sample from each boring was submitted for BTEXN, GRPH, DRPH and ORPH analysis. Benzene
and/or GRPH concentrations exceeded the MTCA Method A cleanup levels in borings B-1 and B-2. Four
December 29, 2016 | Page 7
File No. 0504-119-00
groundwater samples were submitted for BTEXN, GRPH, DRPH and ORPH analysis. GRPH, DRPH and ORPH
concentrations exceeded the MTCA Method A cleanup level in the sample from boring B-1. Other detected
analytes did not exceed the cleanup levels. Based on the chemical analytical results, a SHA ranking might
be necessary.
Based on the chemical analytical results, IDW concentrations exceed MTCA Method A unrestricted land use
cleanup levels and therefore must be disposed at a licensed facility. The accumulated IDW amounted to
approximately ¼ of a drum.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Ecology and their authorized agents.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with
generally accepted environmental science practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. The
conclusions and opinions presented in this report are based on our professional knowledge, judgment and
experience. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood.
Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table and/or figure), if
provided, and any attachments should be considered a copy of the original document. The original
document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record.
Please refer to “Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use,” Appendix C, for additional information
pertaining to use of this report.
FIGURES
µ
SITE
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
Kittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, Washington
2,000 2,0000
Feet
Data Source: Mapbox Open Street Map, 2016
Notes:1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.
Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
P:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F01_VM.mxd Date Exported: 10/25/16 by ccabrera
µ40 0 40
Feet
Notes:1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showingfeatures discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannotguarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is storedby GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the of ficial record of this communication.Data Source: Aerial image from ESRI Data Online.
Legend
@ÑBoring N umber and Approximate Location
@<Previous Boring Number and Approximate Location
Former UST Approximate Location(Terragraphics 2013)
P:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F02_SP.mxd Date Exported: 12/16/16 by tkauhi
@<
@<
@<
@Ñ@Ñ
@Ñ
@Ñ
@Ñ@Ñ
@Ñ
W 15th Ave
N Okanogan StB-1 B-2
B-3B-4
B-5 B-6B-7
BH-24
BH-25
BH-26
Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
Site Plan
Kittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, Washington
Figure 2
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Field Procedures and Boring Logs
December 29, 2016 | Page A-1 File No. 0504-119-00
APPENDIX A
FIELD PROCEDURES AND BORING LOGS
General
Subsurface conditions at the Kittitas County Lower Shop site were explored on December 2, 2016, by
advancing seven direct-push borings at the approximate locations shown on Figure 2. The borings were
advanced between 8 to 10½ feet below existing site grade using a direct-push drill rig. Boring locations
were established in the field using a site plan and measurements from onsite structures. Consequently,
exploration locations should be considered accurate to the degree implied by the method used.
Field methods generally were performed in compliance with the project Master Work Plan assessment
procedures.
Soil Sample Collection
Soil samples were removed from the sleeve using clean nitrile gloves, and transferred into a laboratory
prepared container, labeled with a waterproof pen, and placed on wet ice in a clean plastic-lined cooler.
Direct-push drilling operations were observed by GeoEngineers staff who examined and classified the soil
encountered, obtained soil samples, and maintained a continuous exploration log. Soil encountered in the
borings was classified in general accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) D 2488 and the classification
chart listed in Key to Exploration Logs, Figure A-1. Boring logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-8. The
logs are based on field data interpretation and indicate the depth at which subsurface materials or their
characteristics change, although these changes might actually be gradual.
Field Screening of Soil Samples
GeoEngineers’ field representative performed field-screening tests on soil samples obtained from the
borings. Field screening results were used as a general guideline to assess areas of possible petroleum-
related contamination. The field screening methods used include: (1) PID screening; (2) visual screening;
and (3) water-sheen screening.
PID screening involves placing soil in a container and after agitating or warming, measuring total volatile
organic compounds in the available head space. Visual screening consists of observing soil for stains
indicative of metal- or petroleum-related contamination. Water-sheen screening involved placing soil in a
pan of water and observing the water surface for signs of sheen. Sheen screening may detect both volatile
and nonvolatile petroleum hydrocarbons. Sheens observed are classified as follows:
No Sheen (NS) No visible sheen on the water surface.
Slight Sheen (SS) Light, colorless, dull sheen; spread is irregular, not rapid; sheen dissipates rapidly.
Natural organic matter in the soil may produce a slight sheen.
Moderate Sheen (MS) Light to heavy sheen; may have some color/iridescence; spread is irregular to flowing,
may be rapid; few remaining areas of no sheen on the water surface.
Heavy Sheen (HS) Heavy sheen with color/iridescence; spread is rapid; entire water surface may be
covered with sheen.
December 29, 2016| Page A-2
File No. 0504-119-00
Field screening results can be site specific. The effectiveness of field screening can vary with temperature,
moisture content, organic content, soil type, and contaminant type and age.
Groundwater Sampling
Groundwater samples were collected from the temporary well points consistent with the EPA’s low-flow
groundwater sampling procedures (EPA 2010; Puls and Barcelona 1996). Dedicated polyethylene tubing
and a portable peristaltic pump were used for groundwater purging and sampling. During purging activities,
water quality parameters, including pH, temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity were
measured using a multi-parameter meter equipped with a flow-through cell. Groundwater samples were
collected after (1) water quality parameters stabilized; or (2) a maximum purge time of 15 minutes was
achieved. During purging and sampling the purge rate did not exceed 400 milliliters per minute. Water
quality parameter stabilization criteria included the following:
■ Turbidity: ±10 percent for values greater than 5 nephelometric turbidity units;
■ Conductivity: ±3 percent;
■ pH: ±0.1 unit;
■ Temperature: ±3 percent; and
■ Dissolved oxygen: ± 10 percent.
Field water quality measurements and depth-to-water measurements were recorded on a Well Purging-Field
Water Quality Measurement Form. The groundwater samples were transferred in the field to laboratory-
prepared sample containers and kept cool during transport to the testing laboratory. COC procedures were
observed from the time of sample collection to delivery to the testing laboratory consistent with the QAPP.
AC
Cement ConcreteCC
Asphalt Concrete
No Visible Sheen
Slight Sheen
Moderate Sheen
Heavy Sheen
Not Tested
NS
SS
MS
HS
NT
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SYMBOLS
Measured groundwater level in
exploration, well, or piezometer
Measured free product in well or
piezometer
Graphic Log Contact
Groundwater Contact
Material Description Contact
Laboratory / Field Tests
Sheen Classification
Sampler Symbol Descriptions
NOTE: The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text and the logs of explorations for a proper understanding of subsurface
conditions. Descriptions on the logs apply only at the specific exploration locations and at the time the explorations were made; they are
not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times.
GRAPH
Topsoil/
Forest Duff/Sod
Crushed Rock/
Quarry Spalls
FIGURE A-1
2.4-inch I.D. split barrel
SYMBOLS TYPICAL
KEY TO EXPLORATION LOGS
CR
DESCRIPTIONSLETTER
TS
GC
PT
OH
CH
MH
OL
GM
GP
GW
DESCRIPTIONS
TYPICAL
LETTER
(APPRECIABLE AMOUNT
OF FINES)
MAJOR DIVISIONS
POORLY-GRADED SANDS,
GRAVELLY SAND
PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS
WITH HIGH ORGANIC
CONTENTS
CLEAN SANDS
GRAVELS WITH
FINES
CLEAN
GRAVELS
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
SILTS
AND
CLAYS
SILTS
AND
CLAYS
SAND
AND
SANDY
SOILS
GRAVEL
AND
GRAVELLY
SOILS
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)
FINE
GRAINED
SOILS
COARSE
GRAINED
SOILS
SW
MORE THAN 50%
OF COARSE
FRACTION
RETAINED ON NO.
4 SIEVE
CL
WELL-GRADED SANDS,
GRAVELLY SANDS
SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND
- SILT MIXTURES
LIQUID LIMIT
GREATER THAN 50
SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILTMIXTURES
(APPRECIABLE AMOUNT
OF FINES)
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
LIQUID LIMIT
LESS THAN 50
SANDS WITH
FINES
SP
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)
ML
SC
SM
NOTE: Multiple symbols are used to indicate borderline or dual soil classifications
MORE THAN 50%
OF COARSE
FRACTION
PASSING NO. 4
SIEVE
CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -
SAND - CLAY MIXTURES
CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY
MIXTURES
INORGANIC SILTS, ROCK
FLOUR, CLAYEY SILTS WITH
SLIGHT PLASTICITY
ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC
SILTY CLAYS OF LOW
PLASTICITY
INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS
OR DIATOMACEOUS SILTY
SOILS
ORGANIC CLAYS AND SILTS OF
MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH
PLASTICITY
MORE THAN 50%
PASSING NO. 200
SIEVE
MORE THAN 50%
RETAINED ON NO.
200 SIEVE
WELL-GRADED GRAVELS,
GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES
POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS,GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES
INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO
MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY
CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY
CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
GRAPH
SYMBOLS
Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Shelby tube
Piston
Direct-Push
Bulk or grab
Continuous Coring
Distinct contact between soil strata
Approximate contact between soil
strata
Contact between geologic units
Contact between soil of the same
geologic unit
%F
%G
AL
CA
CP
CS
DS
HA
MC
MD
OC
PM
PI
PP
PPM
SA
TX
UC
VS
Percent fines
Percent gravel
Atterberg limits
Chemical analysis
Laboratory compaction test
Consolidation test
Direct shear
Hydrometer analysis
Moisture content
Moisture content and dry density
Organic content
Permeability or hydraulic conductivity
Plasticity index
Pocket penetrometer
Parts per million
Sieve analysis
Triaxial compression
Unconfined compression
Vane shear
Blowcount is recorded for driven samplers as the number
of blows required to advance sampler 12 inches (or
distance noted). See exploration log for hammer weight
and drop.
A "P" indicates sampler pushed using the weight of the
drill rig.
A "WOH" indicates sampler pushed using the weight of
the hammer.
Rev. 02/16
Site-3:B-1
(2-2.25)
Site-3:B-1
(4.5-4.75)
CA
Site-3:B-1
(9-9.25)
30
20
30
GP
GM
CL
Approximately 2 inches of gray fine to coarse
gravel (medium dense, moist) (crushed base
course)
Brown silty fine to coarse gravel with sand
(medium dense, moist)
Blue-gray clay with sand and occasional gravel
(stiff, moist)
Becomes wet
Boring terminated at approximately 10½ feet due
to refusal
NS
MS
SS
<1
8
3.3
Groundwater observed at approximately 8
feet below ground surface during drilling
Total
Depth (ft)
Hammer
Data
System
Datum
Start End
Checked By
Logged By
SHLDrilled
Notes:
CMD
Surface Elevation (ft)
Vertical Datum
Driller
Groundwater Depth to
Water (ft)Date Measured Elevation (ft)
Easting (X)
Northing (Y)
Geoprobe 5400
Environmental West
Exploration, Inc.Drilling
Method Direct-Push10.5
Autohammer
140 (lbs) / 30 (in) Drop
Drilling
Equipment
12/2/201612/2/2016
See Remarks
Undetermined
Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols.Spokane: Date:12/21/16 Path:P:\0\0504119\GINT\050411900.GPJ DBTemplate/LibTemplate:GEOENGINEERS_DF_STD_US.GDT/GEI8_ENVIRONMENTAL_STANDARD_NO_GWFIELD DATA
Depth (feet)0
5
10 IntervalElevation (feet)Sample NameTestingRecovered (in)Collected SampleBlows/footGraphic LogGroupClassificationMATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
Log of Direct-Push Boring B-1
Kittitas County Lower County Shop
Ellensburg, Washington
0504-119-00
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:Figure A-2
Sheet 1 of 1SheenHeadspaceVapor (ppm)REMARKS
Site-3:B-2
(2-2.5)
Site-3:B-2
(4.5-4.75)
CA
Site-3:B-2
(8-8.25)
28
15
12
GP
GM
GP
CL
Approximately 2 inches of gray fine to coarse
gravel (medium dense, moist) (crushed base
course)
Brown silty fine to coarse gravel with sand
(medium dense, moist)
Black fine to coarse gravel with trace silt (medium
dense, wet)
Blue-gray clay with sand and trace silt (stiff, wet)
Grades with occasional gravel
Boring terminated at approximately 9 feet due to
refusal
NS
SS
NS
NS
<1
10.4
3.4
2.3
Groundwater observed at approximately 4½
feet below ground surface during drilling
Total
Depth (ft)
Hammer
Data
System
Datum
Start End
Checked By
Logged By
SHLDrilled
Notes:
CMD
Surface Elevation (ft)
Vertical Datum
Driller
Groundwater Depth to
Water (ft)Date Measured Elevation (ft)
Easting (X)
Northing (Y)
Geoprobe 5400
Environmental West
Exploration, Inc.Drilling
Method Direct-Push9
Autohammer
140 (lbs) / 30 (in) Drop
Drilling
Equipment
12/2/201612/2/2016
See Remarks
Undetermined
Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols.Spokane: Date:12/21/16 Path:P:\0\0504119\GINT\050411900.GPJ DBTemplate/LibTemplate:GEOENGINEERS_DF_STD_US.GDT/GEI8_ENVIRONMENTAL_STANDARD_NO_GWFIELD DATA
Depth (feet)0
5 IntervalElevation (feet)Sample NameTestingRecovered (in)Collected SampleBlows/footGraphic LogGroupClassificationMATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
Log of Direct-Push Boring B-2
Kittitas County Lower County Shop
Ellensburg, Washington
0504-119-00
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:Figure A-3
Sheet 1 of 1SheenHeadspaceVapor (ppm)REMARKS
Site-3:B-3
(3.25-3.5)
Site-3:B-3
(6.5-6.75)
CA
Site-3:B-3
(8-8.25)
40
30
3
GP
GM
ML
ML
Approximately 1 inch of gray fine to coarse gravel
(medium dense, moist) (crushed base course)
Brown silty fine to coarse gravel with sand
(medium dense, moist)
Brown silt with sand (stiff, moist)
Light brown silt with sand (stiff, moist)
Boring terminated at approximately 8½ feet due to
refusal
NS
NS
NS
<1
<1
<1 Groundwater observed at approximately 8
feet below ground surface during drilling
Total
Depth (ft)
Hammer
Data
System
Datum
Start End
Checked By
Logged By
SHLDrilled
Notes:
CMD
Surface Elevation (ft)
Vertical Datum
Driller
Groundwater Depth to
Water (ft)Date Measured Elevation (ft)
Easting (X)
Northing (Y)
Geoprobe 5400
Environmental West
Exploration, Inc.Drilling
Method Direct-Push8.5
Autohammer
140 (lbs) / 30 (in) Drop
Drilling
Equipment
12/2/201612/2/2016
See Remarks
Undetermined
Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols.Spokane: Date:12/21/16 Path:P:\0\0504119\GINT\050411900.GPJ DBTemplate/LibTemplate:GEOENGINEERS_DF_STD_US.GDT/GEI8_ENVIRONMENTAL_STANDARD_NO_GWFIELD DATA
Depth (feet)0
5 IntervalElevation (feet)Sample NameTestingRecovered (in)Collected SampleBlows/footGraphic LogGroupClassificationMATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
Log of Direct-Push Boring B-3
Kittitas County Lower County Shop
Ellensburg, Washington
0504-119-00
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:Figure A-4
Sheet 1 of 1SheenHeadspaceVapor (ppm)REMARKS
Site-3:B-4
(3-3.25)
Site-3:B-4
(6-6.25)
CA
38
36
0
GP
SP-SM
SM
ML
Approximately 2 inches of gray fine to coarse
gravel (medium dense, moist) (crushed base
course)
Brown fine to coarse sand with silt and gravel
(medium dense, moist)
Brown silty fine to coarse sand (medium dense,
moist)
Light brown silt with sand (stiff, moist)
Boring terminated at approximately 8½ feet due to
refusal
NS
NS
<1
<1
Total
Depth (ft)
Hammer
Data
System
Datum
Start End
Checked By
Logged By
SHLDrilled
Notes:
CMD
Surface Elevation (ft)
Vertical Datum
Driller
Groundwater Depth to
Water (ft)Date Measured Elevation (ft)
Easting (X)
Northing (Y)
Geoprobe 5400
Environmental West
Exploration, Inc.Drilling
Method Direct-Push8.5
Autohammer
140 (lbs) / 30 (in) Drop
Drilling
Equipment
12/2/201612/2/2016
None Observed
Undetermined
Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols.Spokane: Date:12/21/16 Path:P:\0\0504119\GINT\050411900.GPJ DBTemplate/LibTemplate:GEOENGINEERS_DF_STD_US.GDT/GEI8_ENVIRONMENTAL_STANDARD_NO_GWFIELD DATA
Depth (feet)0
5 IntervalElevation (feet)Sample NameTestingRecovered (in)Collected SampleBlows/footGraphic LogGroupClassificationMATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
Log of Direct-Push Boring B-4
Kittitas County Lower County Shop
Ellensburg, Washington
0504-119-00
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:Figure A-5
Sheet 1 of 1SheenHeadspaceVapor (ppm)REMARKS
Site-3: B-5
(1.5-1.75)
Site-3: B-5
(4.75-5)
CA
Site-3: B-5
(8-8.25)
24
12
5
GP
GP-GM
GP-GM
Approximately 2 inches of gray fine to coarse
gravel (medium dense, moist) (crushed base
course)
Brown fine to medium gravel with silt and sand
(medium dense, moist)
Black fine to medium gravel with silt and sand
(medium dense, wet)
Boring terminated at approximately 9 feet due to
refusal
NS
SS
NS
<1
4.3
<1
Groundwater observed at approximately 7½
feet below ground surface during drilling
Total
Depth (ft)
Hammer
Data
System
Datum
Start End
Checked By
Logged By
SHLDrilled
Notes:
CMD
Surface Elevation (ft)
Vertical Datum
Driller
Groundwater Depth to
Water (ft)Date Measured Elevation (ft)
Easting (X)
Northing (Y)
Geoprobe 5400
Environmental West
Exploration, Inc.Drilling
Method Direct-Push9
Autohammer
140 (lbs) / 30 (in) Drop
Drilling
Equipment
12/2/201612/2/2016
See Remarks
Undetermined
Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols.Spokane: Date:12/21/16 Path:P:\0\0504119\GINT\050411900.GPJ DBTemplate/LibTemplate:GEOENGINEERS_DF_STD_US.GDT/GEI8_ENVIRONMENTAL_STANDARD_NO_GWFIELD DATA
Depth (feet)0
5 IntervalElevation (feet)Sample NameTestingRecovered (in)Collected SampleBlows/footGraphic LogGroupClassificationMATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
Log of Direct-Push Boring B-5
Kittitas County Lower County Shop
Ellensburg, Washington
0504-119-00
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:Figure A-6
Sheet 1 of 1SheenHeadspaceVapor (ppm)REMARKS
Site-3:B-6
(3.25-3.5)
Site-3:B-6
(6-6.25)
Site-3:B-6
(8-8.25)
CA
42
34
18
GP
SP-SM
ML
ML
ML
Approximately 2 inches of gray fine to coarse
gravel (medium dense, moist) (crushed base
course)
Brown fine to coarse sand with silt (medium
dense, moist)
Brown sandy silt (stiff, moist)
Blue-gray silt with sand (stiff, moist)
Light brown silt with sand and gravel (stiff, moist)
Boring terminated at approximately 9½ feet due to
refusal
NS
NS
NS
<1
<1
<1
Total
Depth (ft)
Hammer
Data
System
Datum
Start End
Checked By
Logged By
SHLDrilled
Notes:
CMD
Surface Elevation (ft)
Vertical Datum
Driller
Groundwater Depth to
Water (ft)Date Measured Elevation (ft)
Easting (X)
Northing (Y)
Geoprobe 5400
Environmental West
Exploration, Inc.Drilling
Method Direct-Push9.5
Autohammer
140 (lbs) / 30 (in) Drop
Drilling
Equipment
12/2/201612/2/2016
None Observed
Undetermined
Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols.Spokane: Date:12/21/16 Path:P:\0\0504119\GINT\050411900.GPJ DBTemplate/LibTemplate:GEOENGINEERS_DF_STD_US.GDT/GEI8_ENVIRONMENTAL_STANDARD_NO_GWFIELD DATA
Depth (feet)0
5 IntervalElevation (feet)Sample NameTestingRecovered (in)Collected SampleBlows/footGraphic LogGroupClassificationMATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
Log of Direct-Push Boring B-6
Kittitas County Lower County Shop
Ellensburg, Washington
0504-119-00
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:Figure A-7
Sheet 1 of 1SheenHeadspaceVapor (ppm)REMARKS
Site-3:B-7
(2-2.25)
Site-3:B-7
(6-6.25)
CA
30
30
GP
SP
ML
ML
Approximately 3 inches of gray fine to coarse
gravel (medium dense, moist) (crushed base
course)
Brown fine to coarse sand with silt and gravel
(medium dense, moist)
Brown sandy silt (stiff, moist)
Light brown silt with sand (stiff, moist)
Boring terminated at approximately 8 feet due to
refusal
NS
NS
<1
<1
Total
Depth (ft)
Hammer
Data
System
Datum
Start End
Checked By
Logged By
SHLDrilled
Notes:
CMD
Surface Elevation (ft)
Vertical Datum
Driller
Groundwater Depth to
Water (ft)Date Measured Elevation (ft)
Easting (X)
Northing (Y)
Geoprobe 5400
Environmental West
Exploration, Inc.Drilling
Method Direct-Push8
Autohammer
140 (lbs) / 30 (in) Drop
Drilling
Equipment
12/2/201612/2/2016
None Observed
Undetermined
Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols.Spokane: Date:12/21/16 Path:P:\0\0504119\GINT\050411900.GPJ DBTemplate/LibTemplate:GEOENGINEERS_DF_STD_US.GDT/GEI8_ENVIRONMENTAL_STANDARD_NO_GWFIELD DATA
Depth (feet)0
5 IntervalElevation (feet)Sample NameTestingRecovered (in)Collected SampleBlows/footGraphic LogGroupClassificationMATERIAL
DESCRIPTION
Log of Direct-Push Boring B-7
Kittitas County Lower County Shop
Ellensburg, Washington
0504-119-00
Project:
Project Location:
Project Number:Figure A-8
Sheet 1 of 1SheenHeadspaceVapor (ppm)REMARKS
APPENDIX B
Chemical Analytical Laboratory Reports
December 29, 2016 | Page B-1 File No. 0504-119-00
APPENDIX B
CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORTS
Samples
Chain-of-custody procedures were followed during the transport of the field samples to TestAmerica located
in Spokane, Washington. The samples were held in cold storage pending extraction and/or analysis. The
analytical results and quality control records are included in this appendix.
Analytical Data Review
The laboratory maintains an internal quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program as documented in
its laboratory quality assurance manual. The laboratory uses a combination of blanks, surrogate recoveries,
duplicates, matrix spike recoveries, matrix spike duplicate recoveries, blank spike recoveries and blank
spike duplicate recoveries to evaluate the analytical results. The laboratory also uses data quality goals for
individual chemicals or groups of chemicals based on the long-term performance of the test methods. The
data quality goals were included in the laboratory report dated December 12, 2016.
Analytical Data Review Summary
We reviewed the laboratory internal QA/QC in the context of data quality goals. Based on our review, in our
opinion, the quality of the analytical data is acceptable for the intended use.
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Spokane
11922 East 1st Ave
Spokane, WA 99206
Tel: (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Client Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
For:
GeoEngineers Inc
523 East Second Ave
Spokane, Washington 99202
Attn: Scott Lathen
Authorized for release by:
12/12/2016 2:55:26 PM
Randee Arrington, Project Manager II
(509)924-9200
randee.arrington@testamericainc.com
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Table of Contents
Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Page 2 of 30
TestAmerica Spokane
12/12/2016
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Case Narrative
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Job ID: 590-5133-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Spokane
Narrative
Receipt
The samples were received on 12/5/2016 11:55 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on
ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 3.8º C.
Receipt Exceptions
The following sample was collected in an improper container: Site-3: B-7 (6-6.25) (590-5133-22) and Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25) (590-5133-23).
VOC was collected as dirt in jar. Samples were not collected according to 5035A specifications.
GC/MS VOA
Method 8260C: The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: Site-3:B-1 (4.5-4.75) (590-5133-2),
(590-5128-A-1-A) and (590-5128-A-1-A DU). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided.
Method 8260C: The following samples were received outside of holding time without methanol preservation: Site-3: B-7 (6-6.25)
(590-5133-22) and Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25) (590-5133-23).
Method 8260C: The continuing calibration verification (CCV) associated with batch 590-9939 recovered above the upper control limit for
1,1,1-Trichloroethane and Carbon tetrachloride. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;
therefore, the data have been reported. The following samples are impacted: Site-3:B-1:120216 (590-5133-4), Site-3:B-2 :120216
(590-5133-8), Site-3 :B-3:120216 (590-5133-12) and Site-3: B-5 :120216 (590-5133-18).
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
GC Semi VOA
Method NWTPH-Dx: The %RPD of the laboratory control sample (LCS) and laboratory control standard duplicate (LCSD) for preparation
batch 590-9914 recovered outside control limits for the following analytes: Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (C10-C25). The analyte recovery
was within acceptance limits, therefore data will be flagged and reported.
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
General Chemistry
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
VOA Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 3 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Sample Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
590-5133-2 Site-3:B-1 (4.5-4.75)Solid 12/02/16 09:20 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-4 Site-3:B-1:120216 Water 12/02/16 10:00 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-6 Site-3:B-2 (4.5-4.75)Solid 12/02/16 10:05 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-8 Site-3:B-2 :120216 Water 12/02/16 10:35 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-10 Site-3 :B-3 (6.5-6.75)Solid 12/02/16 10:50 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-12 Site-3 :B-3:120216 Water 12/02/16 11:25 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-14 Site-3: B-4 (6-6.25)Solid 12/02/16 11:45 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-16 Site-3: B-5 (4.75-5)Solid 12/02/16 11:55 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-18 Site-3: B-5 :120216 Water 12/02/16 12:40 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-22 Site-3: B-7 (6-6.25)Solid 12/02/16 13:25 12/05/16 11:55
590-5133-23 Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25)Solid 12/02/16 13:00 12/05/16 11:55
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 4 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Definitions/Glossary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Description
H Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
Qualifier
GC Semi VOA
Qualifier Description
*RPD of the LCS and LCSD exceeds the control limits
Qualifier
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CNF Contains no Free Liquid
DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision level concentration
MDA Minimum detectable activity
EDL Estimated Detection Limit
MDC Minimum detectable concentration
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative error ratio
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 5 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-2Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-1 (4.5-4.75)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 09:20
Percent Solids: 82.3Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.10 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.51 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4☼Ethylbenzene ND
2.0 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4☼m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4☼o-Xylene ND
0.51 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4☼Toluene 0.61
3.0 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4☼Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4☼Naphthalene ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)110 75 -120 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)109 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 476-122
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)103 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 480-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)96 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 480-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline 250 25 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)109 41.5 -162 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 13:47 4
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
160 12 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:39 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
30 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:39 1☼Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
35
o-Terphenyl 106 50 -150 12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:39 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 92 12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:39 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-4Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-1:120216
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:00
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene 0.76 0.20 ug/L 12/08/16 05:52 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 05:52 1Ethylbenzene1.9
2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 05:52 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 05:52 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 05:52 1Toluene3.0
3.0 ug/L 12/08/16 05:52 1Xylenes, Total ND
2.0 ug/L 12/09/16 15:31 1Naphthalene8.8
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)117 70 -125 12/08/16 05:52 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)106 12/09/16 15:31 170-125
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 12/08/16 05:52 169-120
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)105 12/09/16 15:31 169-120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 6 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-4Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-1:120216
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:00
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (Continued)
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)108 80 -120 12/08/16 05:52 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)94 12/09/16 15:31 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)94 12/08/16 05:52 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)91 12/09/16 15:31 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline 1900 100 ug/L 12/08/16 05:52 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 68.7 -141 12/08/16 05:52 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
9.6 *0.14 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 19:44 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.23 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 19:44 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
0.83
o-Terphenyl 108 50 -150 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 19:44 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 90 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 19:44 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-6Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-2 (4.5-4.75)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:05
Percent Solids: 84.4Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene 0.032 0.028 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.14 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1☼Ethylbenzene ND
0.55 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1☼m,p-Xylene ND
0.28 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1☼o-Xylene ND
0.14 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1☼Toluene ND
0.83 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1☼Xylenes, Total ND
0.28 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1☼Naphthalene ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)111 75 -120 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)105 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 176-122
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)105 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)95 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline 46 6.9 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)105 41.5 -162 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:09 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 7 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-6Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-2 (4.5-4.75)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:05
Percent Solids: 84.4Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
17 12 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:56 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
29 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:56 1☼Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 92 50 -150 12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:56 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 92 12/06/16 08:26 12/07/16 08:56 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-8Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-2 :120216
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:35
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene 2.3 0.20 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1Ethylbenzene2.3
2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1Xylenes, Total ND
2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1NaphthaleneND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)119 70 -125 12/08/16 06:13 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)101 12/08/16 06:13 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)103 12/08/16 06:13 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)99 12/08/16 06:13 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline 270 100 ug/L 12/08/16 06:13 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)101 68.7 -141 12/08/16 06:13 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
0.19 *0.13 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:17 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.22 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:17 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 88 50 -150 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:17 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 90 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:17 150-150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 8 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-10Client Sample ID: Site-3 :B-3 (6.5-6.75)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:50
Percent Solids: 76.9Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.030 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.15 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1☼Ethylbenzene ND
0.60 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1☼m,p-Xylene ND
0.30 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1☼o-Xylene ND
0.15 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1☼Toluene ND
0.90 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1☼Xylenes, Total ND
0.30 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1☼Naphthalene ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)112 75 -120 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 176-122
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)103 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)94 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 7.5 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 41.5 -162 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:30 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 12 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:34 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
31 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:34 1☼Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 93 50 -150 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:34 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 94 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:34 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-12Client Sample ID: Site-3 :B-3:120216
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:25
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.20 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1Toluene2.9
3.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1Xylenes, Total ND
2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1NaphthaleneND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)119 70 -125 12/08/16 06:35 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 12/08/16 06:35 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)108 12/08/16 06:35 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)95 12/08/16 06:35 180-120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 9 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-12Client Sample ID: Site-3 :B-3:120216
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:25
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 100 ug/L 12/08/16 06:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 68.7 -141 12/08/16 06:35 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND *0.13 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:33 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.22 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:33 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
0.41
o-Terphenyl 88 50 -150 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:33 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 90 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:33 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-14Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-4 (6-6.25)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:45
Percent Solids: 75.5Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.031 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.16 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1☼Ethylbenzene ND
0.62 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1☼m,p-Xylene ND
0.31 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1☼o-Xylene ND
0.16 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1☼Toluene ND
0.93 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1☼Xylenes, Total ND
0.31 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1☼Naphthalene ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)109 75 -120 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)99 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 176-122
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)103 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)95 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 7.8 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)99 41.5 -162 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 14:51 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 13 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:51 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
33 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:51 1☼Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 93 50 -150 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:51 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 92 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 15:51 150-150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 10 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-16Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-5 (4.75-5)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:55
Percent Solids: 85.9Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.00046 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.0023 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1☼Ethylbenzene ND
0.0093 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1☼m,p-Xylene ND
0.0046 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1☼o-Xylene ND
0.0023 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1☼Toluene ND
0.014 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1☼Xylenes, Total ND
0.0046 mg/Kg 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1☼Naphthalene ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)107 75 -120 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)103 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 176-122
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)104 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)96 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline 0.64 0.12 mg/Kg ☼12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)103 41.5 -162 12/05/16 15:29 12/06/16 15:12 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 11 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:08 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
28 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:08 1☼Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 96 50 -150 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:08 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 96 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:08 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-18Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-5 :120216
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 12:40
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.20 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1Xylenes, Total ND
2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1NaphthaleneND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)122 70 -125 12/08/16 06:57 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)101 12/08/16 06:57 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)107 12/08/16 06:57 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)92 12/08/16 06:57 180-120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 11 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-18Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-5 :120216
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 12:40
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 100 ug/L 12/08/16 06:57 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)101 68.7 -141 12/08/16 06:57 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND *0.13 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:49 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.21 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:49 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
0.28
o-Terphenyl 91 50 -150 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:49 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 93 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 20:49 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-22Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-7 (6-6.25)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 13:25
Percent Solids: 74.1Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND H 0.033 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.16 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1☼Ethylbenzene ND H
0.66 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1☼m,p-Xylene ND H
0.33 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1☼o-Xylene ND H
0.16 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1☼Toluene ND H
0.99 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1☼Xylenes, Total ND H
0.33 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1☼Naphthalene ND H
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)101 75 -120 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)98 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 176-122
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)102 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)100 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND H 8.2 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)98 41.5 -162 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 15:51 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 13 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:25 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
33 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:25 1☼Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 93 50 -150 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:25 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 94 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:25 150-150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 12 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-23Client Sample ID: Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25)
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 13:00
Percent Solids: 81.8Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND H 0.023 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.12 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1☼Ethylbenzene ND H
0.46 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1☼m,p-Xylene ND H
0.23 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1☼o-Xylene ND H
0.12 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1☼Toluene ND H
0.70 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1☼Xylenes, Total ND H
0.23 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1☼Naphthalene ND H
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)106 75 -120 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)96 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 176-122
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)105 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)99 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND H 5.8 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)96 41.5 -162 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 16:12 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 12 mg/Kg ☼12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:42 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
29 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:42 1☼Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 93 50 -150 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:42 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 93 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 16:42 150-150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 13 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9889/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9906 Prep Batch: 9889
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.020 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 0.10 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1Ethylbenzene
ND 0.40 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1m,p-Xylene
ND 0.20 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1o-Xylene
ND 0.10 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1Toluene
ND 0.60 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1Xylenes, Total
ND 0.20 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1Naphthalene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)110 75 -120 12/06/16 09:45 1
MB MB
Surrogate
12/05/16 12:29
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
100 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)76 -122
106 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
96 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9889/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9890 Prep Batch: 9889
Benzene 0.500 0.511 mg/Kg 102 76 -123
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Ethylbenzene 0.500 0.504 mg/Kg 101 77 -121
m,p-Xylene 0.500 0.506 mg/Kg 101 78 -124
o-Xylene 0.500 0.513 mg/Kg 103 77 -129
Toluene 0.500 0.520 mg/Kg 104 77 -125
Naphthalene 0.500 0.466 mg/Kg 93 55 -128
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)75 -120
Surrogate
111
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
934-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)76 -122
104Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
97Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9913/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9903 Prep Batch: 9913
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.020 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 0.10 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1Ethylbenzene
ND 0.40 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1m,p-Xylene
ND 0.20 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1o-Xylene
ND 0.10 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1Toluene
ND 0.60 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1Xylenes, Total
ND 0.20 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1Naphthalene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)92 75 -120 12/06/16 09:49 1
MB MB
Surrogate
12/06/16 11:22
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 14 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9913/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9903 Prep Batch: 9913
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)95 76 -122 12/06/16 09:49 1
MB MB
Surrogate
12/06/16 11:22
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
98 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
99 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9913/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9903 Prep Batch: 9913
Benzene 0.500 0.504 mg/Kg 101 76 -123
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Ethylbenzene 0.500 0.516 mg/Kg 103 77 -121
m,p-Xylene 0.500 0.503 mg/Kg 101 78 -124
o-Xylene 0.500 0.500 mg/Kg 100 77 -129
Toluene 0.500 0.512 mg/Kg 102 77 -125
Naphthalene 0.500 0.506 mg/Kg 101 55 -128
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)75 -120
Surrogate
92
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
1014-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)76 -122
93Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
99Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-23 DU
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9903 Prep Batch: 9913
Benzene ND H ND mg/Kg NC 20☼
Analyte
DU DU
DUnitResultQualifier
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier LimitRPD
RPD
Ethylbenzene ND H ND mg/Kg NC 20☼
m,p-Xylene ND H ND mg/Kg NC 20☼
o-Xylene ND H ND mg/Kg NC 20☼
Toluene ND H ND mg/Kg NC 20☼
Xylenes, Total ND H ND mg/Kg NC 20☼
Naphthalene ND H ND mg/Kg NC 20☼
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)75 -120
Surrogate
104
DU DU
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
974-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)76 -122
104Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
102Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9939/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9939
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.20 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 15 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9939/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9939
RL MDL
Ethylbenzene ND 1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1m,p-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1o-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1Toluene
ND 3.0 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1Xylenes, Total
ND 2.0 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1Naphthalene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)113 70 -125 12/08/16 01:41 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
97 12/08/16 01:41 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
110 12/08/16 01:41 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
96 12/08/16 01:41 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9939/1003
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9939
Benzene 10.0 9.69 ug/L 97 80 -120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Ethylbenzene 10.0 9.85 ug/L 99 80 -120
m,p-Xylene 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 80 -120
o-Xylene 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 80 -120
Toluene 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 80 -123
Naphthalene 10.0 7.99 ug/L 80 63 -124
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)70 -125
Surrogate
112
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
1014-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
106Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
98Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9977/10
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9977
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.20 ug/L 12/09/16 15:10 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 1.0 ug/L 12/09/16 15:10 1Ethylbenzene
ND 2.0 ug/L 12/09/16 15:10 1m,p-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 12/09/16 15:10 1o-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 12/09/16 15:10 1Toluene
ND 3.0 ug/L 12/09/16 15:10 1Xylenes, Total
ND 2.0 ug/L 12/09/16 15:10 1Naphthalene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)115 70 -125 12/09/16 15:10 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
98 12/09/16 15:10 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 16 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9977/10
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9977
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)106 80 -120 12/09/16 15:10 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
94 12/09/16 15:10 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9977/1003
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9977
Benzene 10.0 11.6 ug/L 116 80 -120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Ethylbenzene 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 80 -120
m,p-Xylene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 -120
o-Xylene 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 80 -120
Toluene 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 80 -123
Naphthalene 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 63 -124
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)70 -125
Surrogate
108
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
1044-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
102Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
94Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9889/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9907 Prep Batch: 9889
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 5.0 mg/Kg 12/05/16 12:29 12/06/16 09:45 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)100 41.5 -162 12/06/16 09:45 1
MB MB
Surrogate
12/05/16 12:29
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9889/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9907 Prep Batch: 9889
Gasoline 50.0 55.0 mg/Kg 110 74.4 -124
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)41.5 -162
Surrogate
99
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 17 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9913/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9905 Prep Batch: 9913
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 5.0 mg/Kg 12/06/16 11:22 12/06/16 09:49 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)95 41.5 -162 12/06/16 09:49 1
MB MB
Surrogate
12/06/16 11:22
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9913/3-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9905 Prep Batch: 9913
Gasoline 50.0 50.3 mg/Kg 101 74.4 -124
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)41.5 -162
Surrogate
97
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-23 DU
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9905 Prep Batch: 9913
Gasoline ND H ND mg/Kg NC 32.3☼
Analyte
DU DU
DUnitResultQualifier
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier LimitRPD
RPD
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)41.5 -162
Surrogate
97
DU DU
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9940/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9940
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 100 ug/L 12/08/16 01:41 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)97 68.7 -141 12/08/16 01:41 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9940/1004
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9940
Gasoline 1000 1050 ug/L 105 80 -120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)68.7 -141
Surrogate
101
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 18 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9902/1-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9910 Prep Batch: 9902
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 10 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 10:13 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 25 mg/Kg 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 10:13 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
o-Terphenyl 96 50 -150 12/06/16 10:13 1
MB MB
Surrogate
12/06/16 08:26
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
90 12/06/16 08:26 12/06/16 10:13 1n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9902/2-A
Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9910 Prep Batch: 9902
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
67.1 61.1 mg/Kg 91 50 -150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
66.8 63.2 mg/Kg 95 50 -150
o-Terphenyl 50 -150
Surrogate
94
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
92n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-9914/1-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9910 Prep Batch: 9914
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.12 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 17:15 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 0.20 mg/L 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 17:15 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
o-Terphenyl 92 50 -150 12/06/16 17:15 1
MB MB
Surrogate
12/06/16 11:30
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
91 12/06/16 11:30 12/06/16 17:15 1n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9914/2-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9910 Prep Batch: 9914
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
1.61 1.39 mg/L 86 50 -150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
1.60 1.50 mg/L 94 50 -150
o-Terphenyl 50 -150
Surrogate
95
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 19 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-9914/2-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9910 Prep Batch: 9914
n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
Surrogate
95
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 590-9914/3-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 9910 Prep Batch: 9914
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
1.61 2.40 *mg/L 149 50 -150 54 25
Analyte
LCSD LCSD
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
1.60 1.59 mg/L 99 50 -150 6 25
o-Terphenyl 50 -150
Surrogate
109
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
101n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 20 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-1 (4.5-4.75)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-2
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 09:20
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis Moisture NMI12/06/16 08:021 TAL SPK9901
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-1 (4.5-4.75)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-2
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 09:20
Percent Solids: 82.3Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Prep 5035 MRS12/05/16 15:29 TAL SPK9889
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5.804 g 5 mL
Analysis 8260C 4 9906 12/06/16 13:47 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 5035 9889 12/05/16 15:29 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 5.804 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 4 9907 12/06/16 13:47 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 3550C 9902 12/06/16 08:26 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 15.16 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/07/16 08:39 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-1:120216 Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:00
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis 8260C MRS12/08/16 05:521 TAL SPK9939
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis 8260C 1 9977 12/09/16 15:31 CBW TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9940 12/08/16 05:52 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 9914 12/06/16 11:30 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 217.6 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 19:44 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-2 (4.5-4.75)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-6
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:05
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis Moisture NMI12/06/16 08:021 TAL SPK9901
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-2 (4.5-4.75)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-6
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:05
Percent Solids: 84.4Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Prep 5035 MRS12/05/16 15:29 TAL SPK9889
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 4.969 g 5 mL
Analysis 8260C 1 9906 12/06/16 14:09 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 5035 9889 12/05/16 15:29 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 4.969 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9907 12/06/16 14:09 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 3550C 9902 12/06/16 08:26 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 15.21 g 5 mL
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 21 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-2 (4.5-4.75)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-6
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:05
Percent Solids: 84.4Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis NWTPH-Dx NMI12/07/16 08:561 TAL SPK9910
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3:B-2 :120216 Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-8
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:35
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis 8260C MRS12/08/16 06:131 TAL SPK9939
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9940 12/08/16 06:13 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 9914 12/06/16 11:30 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 227.4 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 20:17 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3 :B-3 (6.5-6.75)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-10
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:50
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis Moisture NMI12/06/16 08:021 TAL SPK9901
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3 :B-3 (6.5-6.75)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-10
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 10:50
Percent Solids: 76.9Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Prep 5035 MRS12/05/16 15:29 TAL SPK9889
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5.437 g 5 mL
Analysis 8260C 1 9906 12/06/16 14:30 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 5035 9889 12/05/16 15:29 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 5.437 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9907 12/06/16 14:30 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 3550C 9902 12/06/16 08:26 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 15.70 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 15:34 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3 :B-3:120216 Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-12
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:25
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis 8260C MRS12/08/16 06:351 TAL SPK9939
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9940 12/08/16 06:35 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 9914 12/06/16 11:30 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 229.8 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 20:33 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 22 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-4 (6-6.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-14
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:45
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis Moisture NMI12/06/16 08:021 TAL SPK9901
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-4 (6-6.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-14
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:45
Percent Solids: 75.5Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Prep 5035 MRS12/05/16 15:29 TAL SPK9889
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5.394 g 5 mL
Analysis 8260C 1 9906 12/06/16 14:51 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 5035 9889 12/05/16 15:29 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 5.394 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9907 12/06/16 14:51 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 3550C 9902 12/06/16 08:26 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 15.02 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 15:51 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-5 (4.75-5)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-16
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:55
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis Moisture NMI12/06/16 08:021 TAL SPK9901
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-5 (4.75-5)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-16
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 11:55
Percent Solids: 85.9Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Prep 5035 MRS12/05/16 15:29 TAL SPK9889
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5.85 g 5 mL
Analysis 8260C 1 9906 12/06/16 15:12 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 5035 9889 12/05/16 15:29 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 5.85 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9907 12/06/16 15:12 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3550C 9902 12/06/16 08:26 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 15.35 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 16:08 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-5 :120216 Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-18
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/02/16 12:40
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis 8260C MRS12/08/16 06:571 TAL SPK9939
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9940 12/08/16 06:57 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 9914 12/06/16 11:30 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 232.9 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 20:49 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 23 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-7 (6-6.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-22
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 13:25
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis Moisture NMI12/06/16 08:021 TAL SPK9901
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3: B-7 (6-6.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-22
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 13:25
Percent Solids: 74.1Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Prep 5035 MRS12/06/16 11:22 TAL SPK9913
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5.20 g 5 mL
Analysis 8260C 1 9903 12/06/16 15:51 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 5035 9913 12/06/16 11:22 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 5.20 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9905 12/06/16 15:51 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 3550C 9902 12/06/16 08:26 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 15.54 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 16:25 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-23
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 13:00
Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Analysis Moisture NMI12/06/16 08:021 TAL SPK9901
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA
Client Sample ID: Site-3 : B-6 (8-8.25)Lab Sample ID: 590-5133-23
Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 12/02/16 13:00
Percent Solids: 81.8Date Received: 12/05/16 11:55
Prep 5035 MRS12/06/16 11:22 TAL SPK9913
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 6.51 g 5 mL
Analysis 8260C 1 9903 12/06/16 16:12 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 5035 9913 12/06/16 11:22 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 6.51 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 9905 12/06/16 16:12 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 0.86 mL 43 mL
Prep 3550C 9902 12/06/16 08:26 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 15.66 g 5 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 9910 12/06/16 16:42 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Laboratory References:
TAL SPK = TestAmerica Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 24 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Certification Summary
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Laboratory: TestAmerica Spokane
All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date
Alaska (UST)UST-07110State Program 10-31-17
Washington State Program 10 C569 01-06-17
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 25 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Method Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-5133-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop 0504-119-00
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260CVolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS TAL SPK
NWTPHNWTPH-Gx Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)TAL SPK
NWTPHNWTPH-Dx Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)TAL SPK
EPAMoisturePercent Moisture TAL SPK
Protocol References:
EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency
NWTPH = Northwest Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL SPK = TestAmerica Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 26 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Page 27 of 30 12/12/2016
1234567
8
9
10
11
12
Page 28 of 30 12/12/2016
1234567
8
9
10
11
12
Page 29 of 30 12/12/2016
1234567
8
9
10
11
12
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: GeoEngineers Inc Job Number: 590-5133-1
Login Number: 5133
Question Answer Comment
Creator: Kratz, Sheila J
List Source: TestAmerica Spokane
List Number: 1
N/ARadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
meter.
Lab does not accept radioactive samples.
N/AThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
N/ASample custody seals, if present, are intact.
TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
TrueSamples were received on ice.
TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.
TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.
TrueCOC is present.
TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.
TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.
TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
TrueSamples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
HTs)
TrueSample containers have legible labels.
TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.
TrueSample collection date/times are provided.
TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.
TrueSample bottles are completely filled.
TrueSample Preservation Verified.
TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
TrueContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
<6mm (1/4").
TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.
TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.
N/AResidual Chlorine Checked.
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 30 of 30 12/12/2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
APPENDIX C
Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
December 29, 2016 | Page C-1 File No. 0504-119-00
APPENDIX C
REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE 1
This Appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report.
Environmental Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons and Projects
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Ecology). This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not
applicable to other sites.
GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, an
environmental site assessment study conducted for a property owner may not fulfill the needs of a
prospective purchaser of the same property. Because each environmental study is unique, each
environmental report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. No one except
Ecology should rely on this environmental report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report
should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated.
This Environmental Report is Based on a Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors
This report has been prepared for the Kittitas County Lower Shop site located at 505 West 14th Avenue in
Ellensburg, Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project-specific factors when
establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates
otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was:
■ not prepared for you,
■ not prepared for your project,
■ not prepared for the specific site explored, or
■ completed before important project changes were made.
If important changes are made after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity
to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation, as
appropriate.
Reliance Conditions for Third Parties
Our report was prepared for the exclusive use of Ecology. No other party may rely on the product of our
services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. This is to provide our firm and Ecology with
reasonable protection against open-ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise
be no contractual limits to their actions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services
have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with Ecology and generally accepted environmental
practices in this area at the time this report was prepared.
1 Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org.
December 29, 2016 | Page C-2 File No. 0504-119-00
Environmental Regulations are Always Evolving
Some substances may be present in the site vicinity in quantities or under conditions that may have led, or
may lead, to contamination of the subject site, but are not included in current local, state or federal
regulatory definitions of hazardous substances or do not otherwise present current potential liability.
GeoEngineers cannot be responsible if the standards for appropriate inquiry, or regulatory definitions of
hazardous substance, change or if more stringent environmental standards are developed in the future.
Uncertainty May Remain Even After This Phase II ESA is Completed
No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for contamination in connection with a
property. Our interpretation of subsurface conditions in this study is based on field observations and
chemical analytical data from widely-spaced sampling locations. It is always possible that contamination
exists in areas that were not explored, sampled or analyzed.
Subsurface Conditions Can Change
This environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The
findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by manmade events such
as construction on or adjacent to the site, by new releases of hazardous substances, or by natural events
such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers
before applying this report to determine if it is still applicable.
Most Environmental Findings are Professional Opinions
Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations and chemical analytical data
from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at
those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and
laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface
conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ – sometimes significantly – from
those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a
warranty of the subsurface conditions.
Do Not Redraw the Exploration Logs
Environmental scientists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs
and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in an environmental report should
never be redrawn for inclusion in other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproductions are
acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk.
Read These Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices
(geotechnical engineering, geology and environmental science) are far less exact than other engineering
and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could
lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory “limitations”
provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how
these “Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use” apply to your project or site.
December 29, 2016 | Page C-3
File No. 0504-119-00
Geotechnical, Geologic and Geoenvironmental Reports Should Not be Interchanged
The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from
those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical
engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or
recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated
contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns
regarding a specific project.
Biological Pollutants
GeoEngineers’ Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, prevention or assessment
of the presence of Biological Pollutants. Accordingly, this report does not include any interpretations,
recommendations, findings, or conclusions regarding the detecting, assessing, preventing or abating of
Biological Pollutants and no conclusions or inferences should be drawn regarding Biological Pollutants, as
they may relate to this project. The term “Biological Pollutants” includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi,
spores, bacteria, and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts.
If Ecology desires these specialized services, they should be obtained from a consultant who offers services
in this specialized field.
Have we delivered World Class Client Service?
Please let us know by visiting www.geoengineers.com/feedback.
Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring
Model Remedy LUST Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
for
Washington State Department of Ecology
June 29, 2017
Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring
Model Remedy LUST Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
for
Washington State Department of Ecology
June 29, 2017
523 East Second Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99202
509.363.3125
Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring
Model Remedy LUST Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
File No. 0504-119-00
June 29, 2017
Prepared for:
Washington State Department of Ecology
Toxics Cleanup Program – Central Region Office
1250 West Alder Street
Union Gap, Washington 98903
Attention: Jeff Newschwander
Prepared by:
GeoEngineers, Inc.
523 East Second Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99202
509.363.3125
Scott H. Lathen, PE
Environmental Engineer
Bruce D. Williams
Principal
SHL:BDW:tjh
Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy
of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record.
June 29, 2017 | Page i File No. 0504-119-00
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................... 1
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................................................................................................................... 1
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................ 2
4.1. Groundwater Sampling ............................................................................................................................... 2
5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 3
5.1. Groundwater Chemical Analytical Results................................................................................................. 3
6.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 4
7.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 5
8.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 5
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan and May 2017 Groundwater Elevations
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Field Procedures
Appendix B. Chemical Analytical Laboratory Reports
Appendix C. Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
June 29, 2017 | Page 1 File No. 0504-119-00
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes second quarter 2017 groundwater monitoring activities conducted at the Kittitas
County Lower Shop site located at 505 West 14th Avenue in Ellensburg, Washington (herein referred to as
“site”). The approximate site location is shown in the attached Vicinity Map, Figure 1.
Site environmental activities are managed by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). This
report describes field activities, observations and chemical analytical results associated with groundwater
samples collected at the site. The purpose of the overall assessment activities associated with this project
was to further define the extent of soil and groundwater contamination beneath the site associated with
former underground storage tank (UST) operation.
2.0 PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT
GeoEngineers conducted a soil and groundwater assessment on December 1, 2016 (GeoEngineers 2016).
Benzene and gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons (GRPH) were detected in soil samples collected from
borings B-1 and B-2 at concentrations greater than the Washington State Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA)
Method A unrestricted land use cleanup levels.
GRPH, diesel- and oil-range petroleum hydrocarbons (DRPH and ORPH, respectively) also exceeded MTCA
Method A cleanup levels from a grab groundwater sample collected from soil boring B-1. Boring locations
are shown in the attached Site Plan and May 2017 Groundwater Elevations, Figure 2.
A prior environmental report (Terragraphics 2014) for the site identified one existing groundwater
monitoring well on the property. This well was located during the December 2016 site assessment, and
three additional wells were located. The four existing well locations (MW-1, MW-4 through MW-6) were
re-labeled in the field as shown on Figure 2. Two additional wells (MW-2 and MW-3) were installed during
our recent assessment activities for a total of six groundwater monitoring wells on site.
The first quarter 2017 groundwater monitoring event (GeoEngineers 2017) was conducted in March 2017.
GRPH, benzene and total xylenes were detected in the monitoring well MW-2 sample; however, the reported
concentrations did not exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels.
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services included the following:
1. Coordinate subcontractors (TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. [TestAmerica]) and provide project
management services.
2. Performing the second quarterly groundwater monitoring event. Water quality parameters (pH,
temperature, oxidation-reduction potential [ORP], turbidity, dissolved oxygen [DO] and conductivity)
were measured and documented while purging each well. Six groundwater samples were collected
from the four existing wells (MW-1 and MW-4 through MW-6) and the two recently installed monitoring
wells (MW-2 and MW-3); one duplicate groundwater sample was collected from well MW-3.
Groundwater samples were submitted to TestAmerica for the following laboratory analyses:
June 29, 2017 | Page 2 File No. 0504-119-00
a. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) using
EPA Method 8260C;
b. GRPH using Method NWTPH-Gx; and
c. DRPH and ORPH using Method NWTPH-Dx.
3. Measuring depth to groundwater and calculated relative groundwater elevations to estimate
groundwater flow direction and gradient.
4. Drumming and labeling investigation-derived waste (IDW). A qualified contractor will be retained to
profile and transport the IDW for disposal at a permitted facility. We assume that IDW disposal for the
site will be completed in a single “milk run” at the conclusion of the site assessments.
5. Entering the analytical data into Ecology’s Environmental Information Management (EIM) database.
6. Preparing this monitoring report.
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
4.1. Groundwater Sampling
Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-6) on May 12, 2017. Depth
to groundwater, measured from the top of the PVC well casings, ranged from approximately 3.76 feet
(MW-2) to 4.95 feet (MW-6). Groundwater elevations ranged from approximately 1569.56 feet in
monitoring well MW-5 to 1573.68 feet in monitoring well MW-1. Depth to water and groundwater elevations
are presented in Table 1 below.
Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 were purged and sampled using low-flow sampling techniques.
A peristaltic pump equipped with disposable tubing was used to purge and sample each well. Groundwater
quality parameters generally were measured at 3-minute intervals during well purging. Groundwater
samples were collected when each water quality parameter had stabilized in conformance with the criteria
presented in Appendix A or a maximum purge time of 30 minutes was achieved. Field methods are
described in Appendix A. A duplicate sample was collected from monitoring well MW-3.
Based on groundwater elevations measured on May 12, 2017, groundwater flow generally was toward the
southwest, as depicted in Figure 2. Excluding data from well MW-5, the estimated hydraulic groundwater
gradient across the site was about 0.005 feet per foot (which is approximately 26 feet per mile).
Groundwater elevations decrease toward the southwest near MW-5. Including data from well MW-5, the
estimated groundwater gradient is 0.0118 feet per foot, which is approximately 62.5 feet per mile.
Groundwater elevation contours provided on Figure 2 were based on depth to water measurements,
surveyed elevations of well casings, Surfer Version 1.2 modeling, and our hydrogeological interpretation.
Relatively low DO and ORP levels at MW-2, within the former UST basin indicate the potential reducing
conditions that support bioremediation. The ORP levels in the upgradient well (MW-1) and downgradient
wells (MW-5 and MW-6), are elevated; as is ORP in MW-3 which is closer but cross-gradient to the former
UST area. DO is high in MW-1 and MW-6, moderately high in MW-3 and low in MW-4 and MW-5, possibly
indicating an anaerobic zone extending from MW-2 to MW-5.
June 29, 2017 | Page 3 File No. 0504-119-00
Groundwater samples were submitted to TestAmerica for chemical analysis using the methods described
in “Section 3.0” and chemical analytical results are discussed in “Section 5.0.”
Purge water generated during groundwater sampling was drummed with the water generated during
previous well development/purging.
TABLE 1. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Monitoring
Well
Depth to Water and Field Measured Natural Attenuation Parameters
Depth
to
Water
(feet)
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)
pH
(pH
units)
Specific
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
ORP
(mV)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
Turbidity1
(NTU)
Temperature
(degrees C)
MW-1 3.96 1573.68 7.09 5.78 94.8 5.31 6.4 11.9
MW-2 3.76 1573.32 6.76 7.87 -44.4 0.11 4.5 11.3
MW-3 3.88 1573.14 6.82 7.97 88.4 1.00 4.3 11.5
MW-4 4.41 1572.31 7.03 0.824 13.3 0.22 14.4 14.3
MW-5 4.67 1569.56 7.08 1.167 87.1 0.77 6.4 11.3
MW-6 4.95 1571.52 7.32 0.587 90.3 3.77 3.4 10.9
Notes:
1Turbidity is not a natural attenuation parameter but was measured in the field to evaluate groundwater stabilization.
2 Groundwater elevations calculated using the formula: Groundwater Elevation = Top of Casing Elevation - Depth to Water
mS/cm = milliSiemens per centimeter; mV = millivolts; mg/L = milligrams per liter; NTU = nephelometric turbidity units
5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.1. Groundwater Chemical Analytical Results
Six groundwater samples, and one duplicate, were submitted from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6
to TestAmerica for the chemical analyses described in “Section 3.0 Scope of Services.” The duplicate
sample was collected from monitoring well MW-3. TestAmerica’s laboratory report is included in Appendix B;
chemical analytical results are summarized and compared to MTCA Method A cleanup levels for
unrestricted land use in Table 2, and summarized below.
GRPH was detected in the groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-2 at a concentration
less than the MTCA Method A cleanup level. Other analytes were not detected at concentrations greater
than the laboratory reporting limits.
June 29, 2017 | Page 4 File No. 0504-119-00
TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample
Number
Petroleum- Range
Hydrocarbons Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/L)4 GRPH2 (µg/L) DRPH3 (mg/L) ORPH3 (mg/L) Benzene Toluene Ethyl- benzene o-Xylene m,p-Xylenes3 Total Xylenes3 MTBE MW-1:033117 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-1:051217 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-2:033117 490 <0.26 <0.43 1.5 <1.0 3.3 <1.0 4.6 5.4 <1.0
MW-2:051217 200 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-3:033117 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-3:051217 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
DUP:051217 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-4:033117 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-4:051217 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-5:033117 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-5:051217 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-6:033117 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MW-6:051217 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
MTCA Method
A Cleanup
Levels
1000/8004 0.500 0.500 5 1,000 700 1,0006 20
Notes:
1Chemical analyses completed by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in Spokane Valley, Washington.
2GRPH were analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx.
3DRPH and ORPH were analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH-Dx
4BTEX and MTBE were analyzed by EPA 8260.
5Cleanup level for gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons is 1,000 µg/L if benzene is not detected; otherwise the cleanup level is
800 µg/L.
6Cleanup level for total xylenes (o-xylene and m,p-xylene) is 1,000 µg/L. Concentrations were summed to determine compliance.
µg/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates the contaminant was detected at a concentration greater than the laboratory reporting limits.
6.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Groundwater monitoring was conducted on May 12, 2017 at the Kittitas County Shop located at
505 West 14th Avenue in Ellensburg, Washington. Six groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells
MW-1 through MW-6 were submitted for GRPH, BTEX, MTBE, DRPH and ORPH analysis. GRPH was detected
in the groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-2 at concentrations less than the MTCA
Method A cleanup level. We recommend continuing groundwater monitoring for at least two additional
June 29, 2017 | Page 5 File No. 0504-119-00
quarters (assuming contaminant concentrations are not detected greater than MTCA cleanup levels) to
obtain a data set spanning four consecutive quarters.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Ecology and their authorized agents.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with
generally accepted environmental science practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. The
conclusions and opinions presented in this report are based on our professional knowledge, judgment and
experience. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood.
Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table and/or figure), if
provided, and any attachments should be considered a copy of the original document. The original
document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record.
Please refer to “Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use,” Appendix C, for additional information
pertaining to use of this report.
8.0 REFERENCES
GeoEngineers, Inc. 2016. “Data Gap Investigation.” GEI No. December 16, 2016.
GeoEngineers, Inc. 2017. “Supplemental Data Gap Investigation.” GEI No. June 26, 2017.
Puls, R. W. and M.J. Barcelona. 1996. “Low-flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-water Sampling Procedures.”
EPA Ground Water Issue. April. p.1-9.
TerraGraphics Environmental Engineering, Inc., 2014. Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Report, Lower County Shop, Ellensburg, Washington, prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. April 11, 2014.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1. “Low Stress (Low-Flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure
for the Collection of Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells.” EPA SOP No. GW 01, Revised
January 19, 2010.
FIGURES
µ
SITE
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
Kittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, Washington
2,000 2,0000
Feet
Data Source: Mapbox Open Street Map, 2016
Notes:1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.
Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
P:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F01_VM.mxd Date Exported: 10/25/16 by ccabrera
Notes:1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showingfeatures discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannotguarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is storedby GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.3. GRPH = Gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons Data Source: Aerial image from ESRI Data Online.Legend@<{Previous Boring Numberand Approximate Location@Ñ{Boring Number andApproximate LocationInferred Ground Elevation Contours (feet)May 12, 2017Inferred GroundwaterFlow DirectionFormer UST Approximate Location(Terragraphics 2013)Existing Monitoring WellsApproximate LocationMonitoring Wells Installed byGeoEngineers (March 2017)Approximate LocationP:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F02_GW_May2017.mxd Date Exported: 06/28/17 by cvoss @<{@<{@<{@Ñ{@Ñ{@Ñ{@Ñ{@Ñ{@Ñ{@Ñ{!{W 15th AveN Okanogan St
IDWStorageMW-21573.32MW-31573.14MW-11573.68MW-41572.31MW-51569.56MW-61571.52B-1B-2B-3B-4B-5B-6B-7BH-24BH-25BH-26157015711573
1572Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 FeetSite Plan and May 2017Groundwater ElevationsKittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, WashingtonFigure 2μ60 0 60FeetWell IDGRPH Concentration μg/LMW-1 <150MW-2200MW-3 <150MW-4 <150MW-5 <150MW-6 <150
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Field Procedures
June 29, 2017 | Page A-1 File No. 0504-119-00
APPENDIX A
FIELD PROCEDURES
General
Groundwater was sampled at the Kittitas County Lower Shop site on May 12, 2017, at the monitoring well
locations shown on Figure 2. Field methods generally were performed in compliance with the project Work
Plan assessment procedures.
Groundwater Sampling
Groundwater samples from these wells were collected on May 12, 2017.
Groundwater Depths
Depths to groundwater were measured relative to the north side of the monitoring well casing rims using
an electric water-level indicator. The probe of the water-level indicator was decontaminated between wells
with a detergent wash, followed by two distilled water rinses.
Low-Flow Sampling Procedures
Groundwater sampling was performed consistent with the EPA’s low-flow groundwater sampling procedure,
as described by EPA (2010) and Puls and Barcelona (1996). Monitoring wells were purged using a
peristaltic pump equipped with disposable tubing. During purging activities, water quality parameters,
including pH, conductivity, temperature, turbidity, ORP and DO, were measured using a YSI Pro
multi-parameter meter equipped with a flow-through cell; measurements were recorded approximately
every 3 minutes. The meter calibration was verified at the beginning of each work day consistent with
manufacturer recommendations prior to purging and sampling activities.
Groundwater samples were collected after: (1) water quality parameters had stabilized; or (2) a maximum
purge time of at least 30 minutes was achieved. During purging and sampling, the purge rate was not
allowed to exceed 500 milliliters per minute. Water quality parameter stabilization criteria include the
following:
■ Turbidity: ±10 percent for values greater than 5 NTU;
■ DO: ±10 percent for values greater than 0.5 milligrams per liter;
■ Conductivity: ±3 percent;
■ pH: ±0.1 unit;
■ Temperature: ±3 percent; and
■ ORP: ±10 millivolts.
After groundwater quality stabilization criteria were reached, the pump’s discharge tubing was
disconnected from the flow-through cell and groundwater samples were collected for analysis.
Each sample was pumped directly into sample containers supplied by the laboratory. A duplicate
groundwater sample was collected from well MW-3. Groundwater samples collected for chemical analysis
June 29, 2017 | Page A-2 File No. 0504-119-00
were kept cool during on-site storage and transport to the laboratory. Chain-of-custody procedures were
observed during transport and delivery of the groundwater samples.
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Spokane
11922 East 1st Ave
Spokane, WA 99206
Tel: (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1
Client Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
For:
GeoEngineers Inc
523 East Second Ave
Spokane, Washington 99202
Attn: Scott Lathen
Authorized for release by:
5/19/2017 1:52:07 PM
Randee Arrington, Project Manager II
(509)924-9200
randee.arrington@testamericainc.com
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Table of Contents
Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1
Page 2 of 19
TestAmerica Spokane
5/19/2017
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Case Narrative
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Job ID: 590-6129-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Spokane
Narrative
Receipt
The samples were received on 5/12/2017 3:25 PM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 4.9º C.
GC/MS VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
GC Semi VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Organic Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
VOA Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 3 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Sample Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
590-6129-1 MW-1:051217 Water 05/12/17 09:25 05/12/17 15:25
590-6129-2 MW-2:051217 Water 05/12/17 12:10 05/12/17 15:25
590-6129-3 MW-3:051217 Water 05/12/17 11:10 05/12/17 15:25
590-6129-4 MW-4:051217 Water 05/12/17 10:35 05/12/17 15:25
590-6129-5 MW-5:051217 Water 05/12/17 09:00 05/12/17 15:25
590-6129-6 MW-6:051217 Water 05/12/17 10:05 05/12/17 15:25
590-6129-7 Dup:051217 Water 05/12/17 12:00 05/12/17 15:25
590-6129-8 Trip Blank Water 05/12/17 00:00 05/12/17 15:25
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 4 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Definitions/Glossary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 5 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-1Client Sample ID: MW-1:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 09:25
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1Methyl tert-butyl ether ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)106 70 -125 05/15/17 12:41 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)99 05/15/17 12:41 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)105 05/15/17 12:41 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)102 05/15/17 12:41 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 05/15/17 12:41 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)99 68.7 -141 05/15/17 12:41 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.25 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:01 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.41 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:01 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 92 50 -150 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:01 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 94 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:01 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-2Client Sample ID: MW-2:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 12:10
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1Methyl tert-butyl ether ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)102 70 -125 05/15/17 13:04 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)105 05/15/17 13:04 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)101 05/15/17 13:04 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)94 05/15/17 13:04 180-120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 6 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-2Client Sample ID: MW-2:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 12:10
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline 200 150 ug/L 05/15/17 13:04 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)105 68.7 -141 05/15/17 13:04 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.25 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:19 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.42 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:19 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 94 50 -150 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:19 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 95 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:19 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-3Client Sample ID: MW-3:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 11:10
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1Methyl tert-butyl ether ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)107 70 -125 05/15/17 13:26 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 05/15/17 13:26 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)108 05/15/17 13:26 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)97 05/15/17 13:26 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 05/15/17 13:26 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 68.7 -141 05/15/17 13:26 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.25 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:37 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.42 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:37 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 97 50 -150 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:37 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 96 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:37 150-150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 7 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-4Client Sample ID: MW-4:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 10:35
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1Methyl tert-butyl ether ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)104 70 -125 05/15/17 13:48 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)99 05/15/17 13:48 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)107 05/15/17 13:48 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)100 05/15/17 13:48 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 05/15/17 13:48 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)99 68.7 -141 05/15/17 13:48 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.25 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:54 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.41 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:54 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 94 50 -150 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:54 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 96 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 12:54 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-5Client Sample ID: MW-5:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 09:00
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1Methyl tert-butyl ether ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)107 70 -125 05/15/17 14:11 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)100 05/15/17 14:11 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)108 05/15/17 14:11 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)96 05/15/17 14:11 180-120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 8 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-5Client Sample ID: MW-5:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 09:00
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 05/15/17 14:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)100 68.7 -141 05/15/17 14:11 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.25 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:12 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.41 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:12 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 96 50 -150 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:12 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 98 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:12 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-6Client Sample ID: MW-6:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 10:05
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1Methyl tert-butyl ether ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)108 70 -125 05/15/17 14:33 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 05/15/17 14:33 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)109 05/15/17 14:33 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)97 05/15/17 14:33 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 05/15/17 14:33 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 68.7 -141 05/15/17 14:33 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.25 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:30 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.42 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:30 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 91 50 -150 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:30 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 92 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:30 150-150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 9 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-7Client Sample ID: Dup:051217
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 12:00
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1Xylenes, Total ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1Methyl tert-butyl ether ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)109 70 -125 05/15/17 14:55 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)106 05/15/17 14:55 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)115 05/15/17 14:55 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)100 05/15/17 14:55 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 05/15/17 14:55 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)106 68.7 -141 05/15/17 14:55 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.25 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:47 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
0.41 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:47 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
ND
o-Terphenyl 91 50 -150 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:47 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
n-Triacontane-d62 93 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 13:47 150-150
Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-8Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 00:00
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 15:18 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 15:18 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 15:18 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 15:18 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 15:18 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 15:18 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)111 70 -125 05/15/17 15:18 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)98 05/15/17 15:18 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)110 05/15/17 15:18 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)102 05/15/17 15:18 180-120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 10 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-12073/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12073
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1Ethylbenzene
ND 2.0 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1m,p-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1o-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1Toluene
ND 3.0 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1Xylenes, Total
ND 1.0 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)104 70 -125 05/15/17 11:57 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
101 05/15/17 11:57 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
105 05/15/17 11:57 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
100 05/15/17 11:57 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-12073/1003
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12073
Benzene 10.0 9.29 ug/L 93 80 -120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Ethylbenzene 10.0 9.06 ug/L 91 80 -120
m,p-Xylene 10.0 8.87 ug/L 89 80 -120
o-Xylene 10.0 8.50 ug/L 85 80 -120
Toluene 10.0 8.72 ug/L 87 80 -123
Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 9.52 ug/L 95 71 -128
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)70 -125
Surrogate
99
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
1004-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
101Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
95Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 590-12073/6
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12073
Benzene 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 80 -120 10 25
Analyte
LCSD LCSD
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Ethylbenzene 10.0 9.75 ug/L 98 80 -120 7 25
m,p-Xylene 10.0 9.93 ug/L 99 80 -120 11 25
o-Xylene 10.0 9.58 ug/L 96 80 -120 12 25
Toluene 10.0 9.79 ug/L 98 80 -123 12 25
Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 71 -128 11 12
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)70 -125
Surrogate
100
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
994-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 11 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 590-12073/6
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12073
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
Surrogate
103
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
95Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-12074/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12074
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 05/15/17 11:57 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)101 68.7 -141 05/15/17 11:57 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-12074/1004
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12074
Gasoline 1000 895 ug/L 89 80 -120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)68.7 -141
Surrogate
104
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 590-12074/1015
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12074
Gasoline 1000 925 ug/L 92 80 -120 3 20
Analyte
LCSD LCSD
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)68.7 -141
Surrogate
103
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-12108/1-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12110 Prep Batch: 12108
RL MDL
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
ND 0.24 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 11:07 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
ND 0.40 mg/L 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 11:07 1Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 12 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Method: NWTPH-Dx - Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC) (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-12108/1-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12110 Prep Batch: 12108
o-Terphenyl 99 50 -150 05/17/17 11:07 1
MB MB
Surrogate
05/17/17 09:29
Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
103 05/17/17 09:29 05/17/17 11:07 1n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-12108/2-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12110 Prep Batch: 12108
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
1.60 1.46 mg/L 91 50 -150
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
1.60 1.87 mg/L 117 50 -150
o-Terphenyl 50 -150
Surrogate
97
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
102n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 590-12108/3-A
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 12110 Prep Batch: 12108
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
(C10-C25)
1.60 1.42 mg/L 89 50 -150 3 25
Analyte
LCSD LCSD
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Residual Range Organics (RRO)
(C25-C36)
1.60 1.82 mg/L 114 50 -150 3 25
o-Terphenyl 50 -150
Surrogate
98
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
102n-Triacontane-d62 50 -150
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 13 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Client Sample ID: MW-1:051217 Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-1
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 09:25
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 12:411 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 12074 05/15/17 12:41 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 12108 05/17/17 09:29 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 241.2 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 12110 05/17/17 12:01 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: MW-2:051217 Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 12:10
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 13:041 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 12074 05/15/17 13:04 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 12108 05/17/17 09:29 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 240.9 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 12110 05/17/17 12:19 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: MW-3:051217 Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 11:10
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 13:261 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 12074 05/15/17 13:26 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 12108 05/17/17 09:29 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 239.9 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 12110 05/17/17 12:37 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: MW-4:051217 Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 10:35
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 13:481 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 12074 05/15/17 13:48 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 12108 05/17/17 09:29 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 241.3 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 12110 05/17/17 12:54 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: MW-5:051217 Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-5
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 09:00
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 14:111 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 12074 05/15/17 14:11 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 14 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Prep 3510C NMI05/17/17 09:29 TAL SPK12108
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 243.3 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 12110 05/17/17 13:12 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: MW-6:051217 Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-6
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 10:05
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 14:331 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 12074 05/15/17 14:33 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 12108 05/17/17 09:29 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 240.3 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 12110 05/17/17 13:30 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Dup:051217 Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-7
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 12:00
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 14:551 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 12074 05/15/17 14:55 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Prep 3510C 12108 05/17/17 09:29 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA 244 mL 2 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Dx 1 12110 05/17/17 13:47 NMI TAL SPKTotal/NA
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 590-6129-8
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 05/12/17 00:00
Date Received: 05/12/17 15:25
Analysis 8260C MRS05/15/17 15:181 TAL SPK12073
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Laboratory References:
TAL SPK = TestAmerica Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 15 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Laboratory: TestAmerica Spokane
All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date
Alaska (UST)UST-07110State Program 10-31-17
Washington State Program 10 C569 01-06-18
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 16 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Method Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-6129-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260CVolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS TAL SPK
NWTPHNWTPH-Gx Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)TAL SPK
NWTPHNWTPH-Dx Northwest - Semi-Volatile Petroleum Products (GC)TAL SPK
Protocol References:
NWTPH = Northwest Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL SPK = TestAmerica Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 17 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Page 18 of 19 5/19/2017
1234567
8
9
10
11
12
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: GeoEngineers Inc Job Number: 590-6129-1
Login Number: 6129
Question Answer Comment
Creator: Arrington, Randee E
List Source: TestAmerica Spokane
List Number: 1
N/ARadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
meter.
Lab does not accept radioactive samples.
N/AThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
TrueSample custody seals, if present, are intact.
TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
TrueSamples were received on ice.
TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.
TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.
TrueCOC is present.
TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.
TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.
FalseIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?Not requested on COC
TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
TrueSamples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
HTs)
TrueSample containers have legible labels.
TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.
TrueSample collection date/times are provided.
TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.
TrueSample bottles are completely filled.
TrueSample Preservation Verified.
TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
TrueContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
<6mm (1/4").
TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.
TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.
N/AResidual Chlorine Checked.
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 19 of 19 5/19/2017
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
APPENDIX B
Chemical Analytical Laboratory Reports
June 29, 2017 | Page B-1 File No. 0504-119-00
APPENDIX B
CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORTS
Samples
Chain-of-custody procedures were followed during the transport of the field samples to TestAmerica located
in Spokane, Washington. The samples were held in cold storage pending extraction and/or analysis. The
analytical results and quality control records are included in this appendix.
Analytical Data Review
The laboratory maintains an internal quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program as documented in
its laboratory quality assurance manual. The laboratory uses a combination of blanks, surrogate recoveries,
duplicates, matrix spike recoveries, matrix spike duplicate recoveries, blank spike recoveries and blank
spike duplicate recoveries to evaluate the analytical results. The laboratory also uses data quality goals for
individual chemicals or groups of chemicals based on the long-term performance of the test methods. The
data quality goals were included in the laboratory report dated May 19, 2017.
Analytical Data Review Summary
We reviewed the laboratory internal QA/QC in the context of data quality goals. Based on our review, in our
opinion, the quality of the analytical data is acceptable for the intended use.
APPENDIX C
Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
C- June 29, 2017 | Page C-2 File No. 0504-119-00
APPENDIX C
REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE 1
This Appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report.
Environmental Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons and Projects
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Ecology). This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not
applicable to other sites.
GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, an
environmental site assessment study conducted for a property owner may not fulfill the needs of a
prospective purchaser of the same property. Because each environmental study is unique, each
environmental report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. No one except
Ecology should rely on this environmental report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report
should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated.
This Environmental Report is Based on a Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors
This report has been prepared for the Kittitas County Lower Shop located at 505 West 14th Avenue in
Ellensburg, Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project-specific factors when
establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates
otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was:
■ not prepared for you,
■ not prepared for your project,
■ not prepared for the specific site explored, or
■ completed before important project changes were made.
If important changes are made after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity
to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation, as
appropriate.
Reliance Conditions for Third Parties
Our report was prepared for the exclusive use of Ecology. No other party may rely on the product of our
services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. This is to provide our firm and Ecology with
reasonable protection against open-ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise
be no contractual limits to their actions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services
have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with Ecology and generally accepted environmental
practices in this area at the time this report was prepared.
1 Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org.
C- June 29, 2017 | Page C-3 File No. 0504-119-00
Environmental Regulations are Always Evolving
Some substances may be present in the site vicinity in quantities or under conditions that may have led, or
may lead, to contamination of the subject site, but are not included in current local, state or federal
regulatory definitions of hazardous substances or do not otherwise present current potential liability.
GeoEngineers cannot be responsible if the standards for appropriate inquiry, or regulatory definitions of
hazardous substance, change or if more stringent environmental standards are developed in the future.
Uncertainty May Remain Even After This Phase II ESA is Completed
No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for contamination in connection with a
property. Our interpretation of subsurface conditions in this study is based on field observations and
chemical analytical data from widely-spaced sampling locations. It is always possible that contamination
exists in areas that were not explored, sampled or analyzed.
Subsurface Conditions Can Change
This environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The
findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by manmade events such
as construction on or adjacent to the site, by new releases of hazardous substances, or by natural events
such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers
before applying this report to determine if it is still applicable.
Most Environmental Findings are Professional Opinions
Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations and chemical analytical data
from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at
those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and
laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface
conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ – sometimes significantly – from
those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a
warranty of the subsurface conditions.
Do Not Redraw the Exploration Logs
Environmental scientists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs
and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in an environmental report should
never be redrawn for inclusion in other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproductions are
acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk.
Read These Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices
(geotechnical engineering, geology and environmental science) are far less exact than other engineering
and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could
lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory “limitations”
provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how
these “Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use” apply to your project or site.
C- June 29, 2017 | Page C-4 File No. 0504-119-00
Geotechnical, Geologic and Geoenvironmental Reports Should Not be Interchanged
The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from
those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical
engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or
recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated
contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns
regarding a specific project.
Biological Pollutants
GeoEngineers’ Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, prevention or assessment
of the presence of Biological Pollutants. Accordingly, this report does not include any interpretations,
recommendations, findings, or conclusions regarding the detecting, assessing, preventing or abating of
Biological Pollutants and no conclusions or inferences should be drawn regarding Biological Pollutants, as
they may relate to this project. The term “Biological Pollutants” includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi,
spores, bacteria, and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts.
If Ecology desires these specialized services, they should be obtained from a consultant who offers services
in this specialized field.
Have we delivered World Class Client Service?
Please let us know by visiting www.geoengineers.com/feedback.
Groundwater Monitoring Report
First Quarter 2019
Model Remedy LUST Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
for
Washington State Department of Ecology
March 7, 2019
Groundwater Monitoring Report
First Quarter 2019
Model Remedy LUST Sites
Kittitas County Lower Shop
505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
for
Washington State Department of Ecology
March 7, 2019
523 East Second Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99202
509.363.3125
C �
U' o M G� � 1 CRUM)] C� h��U o n Cr' D C�� ��� C ���Cu) FY
Kit ' as County ,c, a GG� o Gm
go k v. 1 .. r
�o De No. 0504-119-01
Prepared for:
Washington State Department of Ecology
Toxics Cleanup Program - Central Region Office
1250 West Alder Street
Union Gap, Washington 95903
Attention: Jeff Newschwander
Prepared by:
GeoEngineers, Inc.
523 East Second Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99202
509.363.3125
Ju W. Rice, LG
taff Geologist
Bruce D. Williams
Principal
JDO:JWR:BDW:mce
Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy ofthe original document (email, text, table, and/orfigure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy
of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record.
March 7, 2019 | Page i File No. 0504-119-01
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................... 1
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................................................................................................................... 1
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................ 2
4.1. Groundwater Sampling ............................................................................................................................... 2
5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 3
5.1. Groundwater Chemical Analytical Results................................................................................................. 3
6.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 4
7.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 5
8.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 5
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan and January 2019 Groundwater Elevations
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Field Methods
Table A-1. Summary of Groundwater Elevations and Natural Attenuation Parameters
Table A-2. Summary of Chemical Analytical Test Results - Groundwater
Appendix B. Chemical Analytical Laboratory Reports
Appendix C. Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
March 7, 2019 | Page 1 File No. 0504-119-01
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents results of the January 2019 groundwater monitoring event conducted at the Kittitas
County Lower Shop site located at 505 West 14th Avenue in Ellensburg, Washington (herein referred to as
“site”). The approximate site location is shown in the attached Vicinity Map, Figure 1.
Site environmental activities are managed by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). This
report describes field activities, observations and chemical analytical results associated with groundwater
samples collected at the site. The purpose of the overall assessment activities associated with this project
is to further assess the potential for groundwater contamination associated with the former underground
storage tank (UST) operation.
2.0 PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT
GeoEngineers conducted a soil and groundwater assessment on December 1, 2016 (GeoEngineers 2016).
Benzene and gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons (GRPH) were detected in soil samples collected from
borings B-1 and B-2 at concentrations greater than the Washington State Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA)
Method A unrestricted land use cleanup levels.
GRPH, diesel- and oil-range petroleum hydrocarbons (DRPH and ORPH, respectively) also exceeded MTCA
Method A cleanup levels from a grab groundwater sample collected from soil boring B-1. Boring locations
are shown in the attached Site Plan and January 2019 Groundwater Elevations, Figure 2.
A prior environmental report (Terragraphics 2014) for the site identified one existing groundwater
monitoring well on the property. This well was located during the December 2016 site assessment and
three additional wells were located. The four existing well locations (MW-1, MW-4 through MW-6) were
re-labeled in the field as shown on Figure 2. Two additional wells (MW-2 and MW-3) were installed during
our December 2016 assessment activities for a total of six groundwater monitoring wells on site.
First quarter and second quarter 2017 groundwater monitoring events (GeoEngineers 2017a and 2017b)
were conducted in March 2017 and May 2017, respectively. GRPH was detected in the monitoring well
MW-2 sample during both events and benzene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected in the
monitoring well MW-2 sample during the first quarter 2017 event; however, the reported concentrations
did not exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels.
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services included the following:
1. Coordinating subcontractors (TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. [TestAmerica]) and providing project
management services.
2. Performing the first quarter 2019 groundwater monitoring event. Water quality parameters (pH,
temperature, oxidation-reduction potential [ORP], turbidity, dissolved oxygen [DO] and conductivity)
were measured and documented while purging each well. Groundwater samples were collected from
the six site monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-6); one duplicate groundwater sample was collected
March 7, 2019 | Page 2 File No. 0504-119-01
from well MW-2. Groundwater samples were submitted to TestAmerica for the following laboratory
analyses:
a. GRPH using Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx; and
b. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX) using United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260C.
3. Measuring depth to groundwater and calculating relative groundwater elevations to estimate
groundwater flow direction and gradient.
4. Drumming and labeling investigation-derived waste (IDW). A qualified contractor will be retained to
profile and transport the IDW for disposal at a permitted facility. We assume that IDW disposal for the
site will be completed in a single “disposal run” at the conclusion of the site monitoring activities.
5. Entering the analytical data into Ecology’s Environmental Information Management (EIM) database.
6. Preparing this groundwater monitoring report following receipt of the final analytical data.
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
Groundwater monitoring activities included measuring depth to groundwater in site monitoring wells MW-1
through MW-6, measuring field water quality parameters and collecting groundwater samples. Data
collected in the field and laboratory analytical results were then analyzed and interpreted and the results
are summarized in this groundwater monitoring report. Field methods are described in Appendix A.
4.1. Groundwater Elevations
GeoEngineers measured static groundwater levels in site monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 on January
30, 2019. Depth to groundwater, measured from the top of the PVC well casings, ranged from
approximately 3.70 feet (MW-2) to 4.98 feet (MW-6). Groundwater elevations ranged from approximately
1569.84 feet in monitoring well MW-5 to 1573.84 feet in monitoring well MW-1. Depth to water and
groundwater elevations are presented in Table 1 below.
Based on groundwater elevations on January 30, 2019, groundwater flow is generally to the southwest.
The estimated hydraulic groundwater gradient across the site was about 0.009 feet per foot (which is
approximately 47.5 feet per mile). Hydraulic groundwater gradients increase toward the southwest near
MW-5 to about 0.025 feet per foot (which is approximately 132 feet per mile). Approximate groundwater
elevations and flow directions are graphically presented in Figure 2.
4.2. Groundwater Sampling
Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 were purged and sampled using low-flow sampling techniques.
A peristaltic pump equipped with disposable tubing was used to purge and sample each well. Groundwater
quality parameters generally were measured at 3-minute intervals during well purging. Groundwater
samples were collected when each water quality parameter had stabilized in conformance with the criteria
presented in Appendix A or a maximum purge time of 30 minutes was achieved. Field methods are
described in Appendix A. A duplicate sample was collected from monitoring well MW-2. Groundwater
samples were submitted to TestAmerica for chemical analysis using the methods described in “Section
3.0” and chemical analytical results are discussed in “Section 5.0.”
March 7, 2019 | Page 3 File No. 0504-119-01
Purge water generated during groundwater sampling was drummed and labeled for future disposal at a
permitted facility.
4.3. Monitored Natural Attenuation Parameters
Water quality parameters, including turbidity, DO, ORP, specific conductivity, pH, and temperature were
measured in the field using a calibrated water quality meter equipped with a flow-through cell and the
results are summarized in Table 1 below. Relatively low DO and ORP levels at MW-2, within the former UST
basin indicate the potential reducing conditions that support bioremediation. The ORP levels in the
upgradient well (MW-1) and downgradient wells (MW-5 and MW-6), are elevated; as is ORP in MW-3 which
is closer but cross-gradient to the former UST area. DO is high in MW-1 and MW-6, moderately high in MW-
3 and low in MW-4 and MW-5, possibly indicating an anaerobic zone extending from MW-2 to MW-5.
TABLE 1. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Monitoring
Well ID
Depth to Water and Field Measured Natural Attenuation Parameters
Depth
to
Water
(feet)
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)
pH
(pH
units)
Specific
Conductivity
(mS/cm)
ORP
(mV)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
Turbidity1
(NTU)
Temperature
(degrees C)
MW-1 3.80 1,573.84 7.08 0.568 166.7 2.75 10.4 7.0
MW-2 3.70 1,573.38 6.66 0.689 130.5 1.22 4.8 5.5
MW-3 3.86 1,573.16 6.94 0.814 168.8 0.80 4.9 8.4
MW-4 4.43 1,572.29 7.14 0.733 140.5 0.97 2.6 12.7
MW-5 4.39 1,569.84 7.08 1.152 170.5 1.39 9.4 8.3
MW-6 4.98 1,571.49 7.29 0.647 164.3 6.26 4.1 9.4
Notes:
1Turbidity is not a natural attenuation parameter but was measured in the field to evaluate groundwater stabilization.
2 Groundwater elevations calculated using the formula: Groundwater Elevation = Top of Casing Elevation - Depth to Water
mS/cm = milliSiemens per centimeter; mV = millivolts; mg/L = milligrams per liter; NTU = nephelometric turbidity units
5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Six groundwater samples, and one duplicate, were submitted to TestAmerica for the chemical analyses
described in “Section 3.0 Scope of Services.” This section presents the analytical results for groundwater
samples collected during the January 2019 monitoring event.
5.1. Groundwater Chemical Analytical Results
Six groundwater samples, and one duplicate, were submitted from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6
to TestAmerica for the chemical analyses described in “Section 3.0 Scope of Services.” The duplicate
sample was collected from monitoring well MW-2. TestAmerica’s laboratory report is included in Appendix B;
chemical analytical results are summarized and compared to MTCA Method A cleanup levels for
unrestricted land use in Table 2 and summarized below. Contaminants were not detected in the samples
collected from MW-1 through MW-6.
March 7, 2019 | Page 4 File No. 0504-119-01
TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Monitoring Well Sample ID
Petroleum-
Range
Hydrocarbons
(µg/L)1 Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/L)1,3
GRPH2 Benzene Toluene Ethyl- benzene o-Xylene m,p-Xylenes Total Xylenes MW-1 MW-1:013019 <150 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0
MW-2 MW-2:013019 <150 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0
MW-3 MW-3:013019 <150 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0
MW-4 MW-4:013019 <150 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0
MW-5 MW-5:013019 <150 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0
MW-6 MW-6:013019 <150 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0
Duplicate 1/30/19 <150 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0
MTCA Method A
Cleanup Levels 1000/8004 5 1,000 700 1,0005
Notes:
1Chemical analyses completed by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in Spokane Valley, Washington.
2GRPH were analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx.
3BTEX and MTBE were analyzed by EPA 8260.
4Cleanup level for gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons is 1,000 µg/L if benzene is not detected; otherwise the cleanup level is
800 µg/L.
5Cleanup level for total xylenes (o-xylene and m,p-xylene) is 1,000 µg/L. Concentrations were summed to determine compliance.
µg/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates the contaminant was detected at a concentration greater than the laboratory reporting limits.
6.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Groundwater monitoring was conducted on January 30, 2019 at the Kittitas County Shop located at
505 West 14th Avenue in Ellensburg, Washington. Six groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells
MW-1 through MW-6 were submitted for GRPH and BTEX analysis. No analytes were detected at
concentrations greater than laboratory reporting limits. We recommend continuing groundwater monitoring
for at least one additional quarter (assuming contaminant concentrations are not detected greater than
MTCA cleanup levels) to obtain a data set spanning four quarters.
March 7, 2019 | Page 5 File No. 0504-119-01
7.0 LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Ecology and their authorized agents.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with
generally accepted environmental science practices in this area at the time this report was prepared.
The conclusions and opinions presented in this report are based on our professional knowledge, judgment
and experience. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood.
Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table and/or figure), if
provided, and any attachments should be considered a copy of the original document. The original
document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record.
Please refer to “Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use,” Appendix C, for additional information
pertaining to use of this report.
8.0 REFERENCES
GeoEngineers, Inc. 2016. “Data Gap Investigation.” GEI No. 0504-119-00, December 29, 2016.
GeoEngineers, Inc. 2017a. “Supplemental Data Gap Investigation.” GEI No. 0504-119-00, June 26, 2017.
GeoEngineers, Inc. 2017b. “Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring.” GEI File No. 0504-119-00,
July 5, 2017
TerraGraphics Environmental Engineering, Inc., 2014. Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Report, Lower County Shop, Ellensburg, Washington, prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. April 11, 2014.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1. “Low Stress (Low-Flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure
for the Collection of Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells.” EPA SOP No. GW 01, Revised
September 19, 2017.
FIGURES
µ
SITE
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
Kittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, Washington
2,000 2,0000
Feet
Data Source: Mapbox Open Street Map, 2016
Notes:1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.
Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
P:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F01_VM.mxd Date Exported: 10/25/16 by ccabrera
Notes:
1.The locations of all features shown are approximate.
2.This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.
3.GRPH = Gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons; µg/L = micrograms per liter
Data Source: Aerial image from ESRI Data Online.
Legend
@<Previous Boring Numberand Approximate Location
@ÑBoring Number andApproximate Location
Inferred Ground Elevation Contours (feet)January 29, 2019
Inferred GroundwaterFlow Direction
Former UST Approximate Location(Terragraphics 2013)
Existing Monitoring WellsApproximate LocationMonitoring Wells Installed byGeoEngineers (March 2017)Approximate Location
P:\0\0504119\GIS\MXDs\050411900_F02_GW_Jan2019.mxd Date Exported: 02/25/19 by maugust
@<
@<
@<
@Ñ@Ñ
@Ñ
@Ñ
@Ñ@Ñ@Ñ
W 15th Ave
N Okanogan StIDWStorage
MW-21573.38
1571
1
5
7
3
1572
1570
!
MW-31,573.16
MW-11,573.84
MW-41,572.29
MW-51,569.84
MW-61,571.49
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
B-7
BH-24
BH-25
BH-26
Projection: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
Site Plan and January 2019
Groundwater Elevations
Kittitas County Lower Shop505 West 14th AvenueEllensburg, Washington
Figure 2
µ
60 0 60
Feet
GRPH
(µg/L)
MW-1 <150
MW-2 <150
MW-3 <150
MW-4 <150
MW-5 <150
MW-6 <150
Chemical Analytical Results
Well ID
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Field Procedures
March 7, 2019 | Page A-1 File No. 0504-119-01
APPENDIX A
FIELD METHODS
General
Groundwater conditions at the Kittitas County Lower Shop in Ellensburg, Washington were monitored on
January 30, 2019, by measuring depth to groundwater and sampling groundwater in monitoring wells MW-1
through MW-6. Field methods generally were performed in compliance with the project Work Plan
assessment procedures.
Groundwater Elevations
The static depth to groundwater was measured using a Solinst Model Interface Probe. Measurements were
referenced to the north side of the surveyed top-of-casing in each well monument. Groundwater elevations
were calculated by subtracting the depth to water measurement from the surveyed well casing elevation
and are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). The probe of the water level
indicator was decontaminated after use with a detergent wash, followed by two distilled water rinses.
Depths to groundwater measured in the monitoring wells in January 2019 are summarized in Table 1;
measurements from this event and two prior events are tabulated in Table A-1. The corresponding
groundwater elevations in January 2019 are summarized in Table 1 and shown in Figure 2.
Low-Flow Sampling Procedures
Groundwater sampling was performed consistent with the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA’s) low-flow groundwater sampling procedure, as described by EPA (2017). Monitoring wells were
purged using a peristaltic pump equipped and disposable tubing. During purging activities, water quality
parameters, including pH, conductivity, temperature, turbidity, ORP and DO, were measured using a YSI Pro
multi-parameter meter equipped with a flow-through cell; measurements were recorded approximately
every 3 minutes. The meter calibration was verified at the beginning of each work day consistent with
manufacturer recommendations prior to purging and sampling activities.
Groundwater samples were collected after: (1) water quality parameters had stabilized; or (2) a maximum
purge time of at least 30 minutes was achieved. During purging and sampling, the purge rate was not
allowed to exceed 500 milliliters per minute. Water quality parameter stabilization criteria include the
following:
■ Turbidity: ±10 percent for values greater than 5 NTU;
■ DO: ±10 percent for values greater than 0.5 milligrams per liter;
■ Conductivity: ±3 percent;
■ pH: ±0.1 unit;
■ Temperature: ±3 percent; and
■ ORP: ±10 millivolts.
After groundwater quality stabilization criteria were reached, the pump’s discharge tubing was
disconnected from the flow-through cell, and groundwater samples were collected for analysis.
March 7, 2019 | Page A-2 File No. 0504-119-01
Each sample was pumped directly into sample containers supplied by the laboratory. Groundwater samples
collected for chemical analysis were stored on ice during on-site storage and transport to the laboratory.
Chain-of-custody procedures were observed from sample collection through transport and delivery to the
laboratory.
Groundwater analytical results are included on Table 2. Results from this event and two prior events are
shown on Table A-2.
MW-1 03/31/17 3.56 1,574.08 6.61 6.50 558 211.1 12.2 7.1
1577.64 05/12/17 3.96 1,573.68 7.09 5.31 5780 94.8 6.4 11.9
01/30/19 3.80 1,573.84 7.08 2.75 568 166.7 10.4 7.0
MW-2 03/31/17 3.35 1,573.73 6.71 0.19 1110 -9.7 3.0 6.6
1577.08 05/12/17 3.76 1,573.32 6.76 0.11 7870 -44.4 4.5 11.3
01/30/19 3.70 1,573.38 6.66 1.22 689 130.5 4.8 5.5
MW-3 03/31/17 3.51 1,573.51 6.62 1.97 1434 138.8 20.1 8.4
1577.02 05/12/17 3.88 1,573.14 6.82 1.00 7970 88.4 4.3 11.5
01/30/19 3.86 1,573.16 6.94 0.80 814 168.8 4.9 8.4
MW-4 03/31/17 4.41 1,572.31 7.03 0.57 660 60.3 7.0 13.3
1576.72 05/12/17 4.41 1,572.31 7.03 0.22 824 13.3 14.4 14.3
01/30/19 4.43 1,572.29 7.14 0.97 733 140.5 2.6 12.7
MW-5 03/31/17 7.01 1,567.22 7.05 5.43 1159 179.5 26.5 10.4
1574.23 05/12/17 4.67 1,569.56 7.08 0.77 1167 87.1 6.4 11.3
01/30/19 4.39 1,569.84 7.08 1.39 1152 170.5 9.4 8.3
MW-6 03/31/17 4.95 1,571.52 7.05 4.43 602 196.2 8.2 8.4
1576.47 05/12/17 4.95 1,571.52 7.32 3.77 587 90.3 3.4 10.9
01/30/19 4.98 1,571.49 7.29 6.26 647 164.3 4.1 9.4
Notes:
1Depth to water measured from the north side of the top of the well casing.
2Groundwater elevations were calculated through use of the following formula: Groundwater elevation = Top of Casing Elevation - Depth to Water.
C = Celsius; NTU = nephelometric turbidity units; mg/L = milligrams per liter; µS/cm = microSiemens per centimeter
Table A-1
Summary of Groundwater Elevations and Natural Attenuation Parameters
Well Number and
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)
Date
Measured
Depth to
Water1
(feet)
Groundwater
Elevation2
(feet)
Kittitas County Lower Shop - 505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, Washington
pH (pH
units)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
Specific
Conductivity
(µS/cm)
Redox Potential
(millivolts)
Turbidity
(NTU)
Temperature
(degrees C)
File No. 0504-119-01
Table A-1 | March 7, 2019 1 of 1
GRPH2 DRPH3 ORPH4
(µg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)
MW-1 03/31/17 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
1577.64 05/12/17 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
01/30/19 <150 ----<0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 --
MW-2 03/31/17 490 <0.26 <0.43 1.5 <1.0 3.3 <1.0 4.6 5.4 <1.0
1577.08 05/12/17 200 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
01/30/19 <150 ----<4.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 --
MW-3 03/31/17 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
1577.02 05/12/17 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
01/30/19 <150 ----<0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 --
MW-4 03/31/17 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
1576.72 05/12/17 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
01/30/19 <150 ----<0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 --
MW-5 03/31/17 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
1574.23 05/12/17 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
01/30/19 <150 ----<0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 --
MW-6 03/31/17 <150 <0.25 <0.42 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
1576.47 05/12/17 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
01/30/19 <150 ----<0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 --
DUP:051217 (MW-3)05/12/17 <150 <0.25 <0.41 <0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <1.0
DUP:013019 (MW-2)01/30/19 <150 ----<0.40 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 --
1,000/8004 0.500 0.500 5 1,000 700
Notes:
1Chemical analyses conducted by TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. located in Spokane Valley, Washington.
2Gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons (GRPH) were analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx.
3Diesel- and oil-range petroleum hydrocarbons (DRPH and ORPH, respectively) were analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH-Dx
4BTEX were analyzed by EPA 8260.
5Cleanup level is 1,000 µg/L; 800 µg/L when benzene is detected.
6Cleanup level for total xylenes (o-xylene and m,p-xylene) is 1,000 µg/L. Concentrations were summed to determine compliance.
Bold = detection is greater than reporting limit; EPA = Environmental Protection Agency; MTBE = methyl tert-butyl ether; MTCA = Model Toxics Control Act
mg/L = milligrams per liter; µg/L = micrograms per liter; NA = not analyzed; MTCA = Model Toxics Control Act; NE = not established;
Volatile Organic Compounds (µg/L)4
Benzene
1,0005
MTBE
Table A-2
MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels
Toluene Ethylbenzene o-Xylene m,p-Xylenes Total Xylenes
Summary of Chemical Analytical Test Results1 – Groundwater
Kittitas County Lower Shop - 505 West 14th Avenue
Ellensburg, WA
Well Number and Top of
Casing Elevation (feet)
Date
Measured
Petroleum-Range Hydrocarbons
File No. 0504-119-01
Table A-2 | March 7, 2019 1 of 1
APPENDIX B
Chemical Analytical Laboratory Data
March 7, 2019 | Page B-1 File No. 0504-119-01
APPENDIX B
CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA
This report documents the results of a United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-defined
Stage 2A data validation (EPA Document 540-R-08-005; EPA, 2009) of analytical data from the analyses
of water samples collected as part of the January 2019 sampling event, and the associated laboratory and
field quality control (QC) samples. The samples were obtained from the Kittitas County Lower Shop site
located at 505 West 14th Avenue in Ellensburg, Washington.
OBJECTIVE AND QUALITY CONTROL ELEMENTS
GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) completed the data validation consistent with the EPA Contract
Laboratory Program National Functional for Organic Superfund Methods Data Review (EPA, 2017) (National
Functional Guidelines) to determine if the laboratory analytical results meet the project objectives and are
usable for their intended purpose. Data usability was assessed by determining if:
■ The samples were analyzed using well-defined and acceptable methods that provide reporting limits
below applicable regulatory criteria;
■ The precision and accuracy of the data are well-defined and sufficient to provide defensible data; and
■ The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures utilized by the laboratory meet acceptable
industry practices and standards.
The data validation included review of the following QC elements:
■ Data Package Completeness
■ Chain-of-Custody Documentation
■ Holding Times and Sample Preservation
■ Surrogate Recoveries
■ Method and Trip Blanks
■ Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates
■ Laboratory Control Samples/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicates
■ Field Duplicates
VALIDATED SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUPS
This data validation included review of the sample delivery group (SDG) listed below in Table 1.
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF VALIDATED SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUPS
Laboratory
SDG Samples Validated
590-10350-1 MW-1:013019, MW-2:013019, MW-3:013019, DUP:013019, MW-4:013019,
MW-5:013019, MW-6:013019, Trip Blank
March 7, 2019 | Page B-2 File No. 0504-119-01
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (TestAmerica), located in Spokane Valley, Washington, performed laboratory
analyses on the samples using one or more of the following methods:
■ Gasoline-Range Hydrocarbons (NWTPH-Gx) by Method NWTPH-Gx; and
■ Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by Method EPA 8260C
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
The results for each of the QC elements are summarized below.
Data Package Completeness
TestAmerica provided the required deliverables for the data validation according to the National Functional
Guidelines. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes and the identified anomalies
were discussed in the relevant laboratory case narrative.
Chain-of-Custody Documentation
Chain-of-custody (COC) forms were provided with the laboratory analytical reports. The COCs were accurate
and complete when submitted to the laboratory.
Holding Times and Sample Preservation
The sample holding time is defined as the time that elapses between sample collection and sample
analysis. Maximum holding time criteria exist for each analysis to help ensure that the analyte
concentrations found at the time of analysis reflect the concentration present at the time of sample
collection. Established holding times were met for each analysis. The sample cooler arrived at the laboratory
within the appropriate temperatures of between 2 and 6 degrees Celsius.
Surrogate Recoveries
A surrogate compound is a compound that is chemically similar to the organic analytes of interest, but
unlikely to be found in an environmental sample. Surrogates are used for organic analyses and are added
to the samples, standards and blanks to serve as an accuracy and specificity check of each analysis.
The surrogates are added to the samples at a known concentration and percent recoveries are calculated
following analysis. The surrogate percent recoveries for field samples were within the laboratory control
limits.
Method and Trip Blanks
Method Blanks
Method blanks are analyzed to ensure that laboratory procedures and reagents do not introduce
measurable concentrations of the analytes of interest. A method blank was analyzed with each batch of
samples, at a frequency of 1 per 20 samples. For each sample batch, method blanks for the applicable
methods were analyzed at the required frequency. None of the analytes of interest were detected in the
method blanks.
March 7, 2019 | Page B-3 File No. 0504-119-01
Trip Blanks
Trip blanks are analyzed to provide an indication as to whether volatile compounds have
cross-contaminated other like samples within the transportation process to the laboratory. None of the
analytes of interest were detected in the trip blank.
Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates
Since the actual analyte concentration in an environmental sample is not known, the accuracy of a
particular analysis is usually inferred by performing a matrix spike (MS) analysis on one sample from the
associated batch, known as the parent sample. One aliquot of the sample is analyzed in the normal manner
and then a second aliquot of the sample is spiked with a known amount of analyte concentration and
analyzed. From these analyses, a percent recovery is calculated. Matrix spike duplicate (MSD) analyses are
generally performed for organic analyses as a precision check and analyzed in the same sequence as a
matrix spike. Using the result values from the MS and MSD, the relative percent difference (RPD) is
calculated.
A laboratory control sample/laboratory control sample duplicate (LCS/LCSD) sample set was performed in
lieu of a MS/MSD analysis.
Laboratory Control Samples/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicates
A laboratory control sample (LCS) is a blank sample that is spiked with a known amount of analyte and then
analyzed. An LCS is similar to an MS, but without the possibility of matrix interference. Given that matrix
interference is not an issue, the LCS/LCSD control limits for accuracy and precision are usually more
rigorous than for MS/MSD analyses. Additionally, data qualification based on LCS/LCSD analyses would
apply to all samples in the associated batch, instead of just the parent sample. The percent recovery control
limits for LCS and LCSD analyses are specified in the laboratory documents, as are the RPD control limits
for LCS/LCSD sample sets.
One LCS/LCSD analysis should be performed for every analytical batch or every 20 field samples, whichever
is more frequent. The frequency requirements were met for all analyses and the percent recovery and RPD
values were within the proper control limits.
FIELD DUPLICATES
In order to assess precision, field duplicate samples were collected and analyzed along with the reviewed
sample batches. The duplicate samples were analyzed for the same parameters as the associated parent
samples. Precision is determined by calculating the RPD between each pair of samples. If one or more of
the sample analytes has a concentration less than five times the reporting limit for that sample, then the
absolute difference is used instead of the RPD. The RPD control limit for groundwater samples is
35 percent.
SDG 590-10350-1: One field duplicate sample pair, MW-3:013019 and DUP:013019, was submitted with
this SDG. The precision criteria for all target analytes were met for this sample pair.
March 7, 2019 | Page B-4 File No. 0504-119-01
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
As was determined by this data validation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods.
Accuracy was acceptable, as demonstrated by the surrogate and LCS/LCSD percent recovery values.
Precision was acceptable, as demonstrated by the LCS/LCSD and field duplicate RPD values.
No analytical results were qualified. The data are acceptable for the intended use.
REFERENCES
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Guidance for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory
Analytical Data for Superfund Use,” EPA-540-R-08-005. January 2009.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines
for Organic Superfund Methods Data Review,” EPA-540-R-2017-002. January 2017.
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Spokane
11922 East 1st Ave
Spokane, WA 99206
Tel: (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1
Client Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
For:
GeoEngineers Inc
523 East Second Ave
Spokane, Washington 99202
Attn: Mr. Justin Rice
Authorized for release by:
2/12/2019 1:18:23 PM
Randee Arrington, Project Manager II
(509)924-9200
randee.arrington@testamericainc.com
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is
intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Table of Contents
Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1
Page 2 of 17
TestAmerica Spokane
2/12/2019
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Case Narrative
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Job ID: 590-10350-1
Laboratory: TestAmerica Spokane
Narrative
Receipt
The samples were received on 2/1/2019 10:50 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.
The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 2.5º C.
GC/MS VOA
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
VOA Prep
No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 3 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Sample Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
590-10350-1 MW-1:013019 Water 01/30/19 08:40 02/01/19 10:50
590-10350-2 MW-2:013019 Water 01/30/19 12:06 02/01/19 10:50
590-10350-3 MW-3:013019 Water 01/30/19 09:18 02/01/19 10:50
590-10350-4 MW-4:013019 Water 01/30/19 10:09 02/01/19 10:50
590-10350-5 MW-5:013019 Water 01/30/19 10:50 02/01/19 10:50
590-10350-6 MW-6:013019 Water 01/30/19 11:25 02/01/19 10:50
590-10350-7 DUP:013019 Water 01/30/19 12:00 02/01/19 10:50
590-10350-8 Trip Blank Water 01/30/19 08:00 02/01/19 10:50
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 4 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Definitions/Glossary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
NC Not Calculated
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 5 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-1Client Sample ID: MW-1:013019
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 08:40
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 19:29 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:29 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:29 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:29 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:29 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:29 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)111 70 -125 02/05/19 19:29 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)103 02/05/19 19:29 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)105 02/05/19 19:29 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)100 02/05/19 19:29 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 19:29 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)103 68.7 -141 02/05/19 19:29 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-2Client Sample ID: MW-2:013019
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 12:06
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 19:50 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:50 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:50 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:50 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:50 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 19:50 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)108 70 -125 02/05/19 19:50 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)106 02/05/19 19:50 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)103 02/05/19 19:50 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)100 02/05/19 19:50 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 19:50 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)106 68.7 -141 02/05/19 19:50 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 6 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-3Client Sample ID: MW-3:013019
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 09:18
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 20:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:11 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:11 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:11 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:11 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:11 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)110 70 -125 02/05/19 20:11 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)107 02/05/19 20:11 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)106 02/05/19 20:11 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)98 02/05/19 20:11 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 20:11 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)107 68.7 -141 02/05/19 20:11 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-4Client Sample ID: MW-4:013019
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 10:09
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 20:32 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:32 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:32 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:32 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:32 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:32 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)111 70 -125 02/05/19 20:32 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 02/05/19 20:32 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)105 02/05/19 20:32 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)99 02/05/19 20:32 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 20:32 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)102 68.7 -141 02/05/19 20:32 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 7 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-5Client Sample ID: MW-5:013019
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 10:50
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 20:53 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:53 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:53 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:53 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:53 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 20:53 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)112 70 -125 02/05/19 20:53 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 02/05/19 20:53 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)103 02/05/19 20:53 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)96 02/05/19 20:53 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 20:53 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 68.7 -141 02/05/19 20:53 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-6Client Sample ID: MW-6:013019
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 11:25
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 21:14 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:14 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:14 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:14 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:14 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:14 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)110 70 -125 02/05/19 21:14 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)103 02/05/19 21:14 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)103 02/05/19 21:14 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)99 02/05/19 21:14 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 21:14 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)103 68.7 -141 02/05/19 21:14 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 8 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-7Client Sample ID: DUP:013019
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 12:00
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 21:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:35 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:35 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:35 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:35 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:35 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)112 70 -125 02/05/19 21:35 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)106 02/05/19 21:35 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)101 02/05/19 21:35 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)96 02/05/19 21:35 180-120
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 21:35 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)106 68.7 -141 02/05/19 21:35 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-8Client Sample ID: Trip Blank
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 08:00
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 21:56 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:56 1EthylbenzeneND
2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:56 1m,p-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:56 1o-Xylene ND
1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:56 1TolueneND
3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 21:56 1Xylenes, Total ND
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)109 70 -125 02/05/19 21:56 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)103 02/05/19 21:56 169-120
Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)105 02/05/19 21:56 180-120
Toluene-d8 (Surr)99 02/05/19 21:56 180-120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 9 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Method: 8260C - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-20817/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 20817
RL MDL
Benzene ND 0.40 ug/L 02/05/19 15:58 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
ND 1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 15:58 1Ethylbenzene
ND 2.0 ug/L 02/05/19 15:58 1m,p-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 15:58 1o-Xylene
ND 1.0 ug/L 02/05/19 15:58 1Toluene
ND 3.0 ug/L 02/05/19 15:58 1Xylenes, Total
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)109 70 -125 02/05/19 15:58 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
104 02/05/19 15:58 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
104 02/05/19 15:58 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
97 02/05/19 15:58 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-20817/1003
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 20817
Benzene 10.0 11.7 ug/L 117 80 -120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
Ethylbenzene 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 80 -120
m,p-Xylene 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 80 -120
o-Xylene 10.0 11.2 ug/L 112 80 -120
Toluene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 -123
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)70 -125
Surrogate
110
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
1024-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
102Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
96Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 590-20817/6
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 20817
Benzene 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 80 -120 2 25
Analyte
LCSD LCSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Ethylbenzene 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 80 -120 0 25
m,p-Xylene 10.0 11.1 ug/L 111 80 -120 3 25
o-Xylene 10.0 11.1 ug/L 111 80 -120 1 25
Toluene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 -123 1 25
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)70 -125
Surrogate
106
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
1024-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 -120
103Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)80 -120
95Toluene-d8 (Surr)80 -120
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 10 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Method: NWTPH-Gx - Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 590-20818/5
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 20818
RL MDL
Gasoline ND 150 ug/L 02/05/19 15:58 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 68.7 -141 02/05/19 15:58 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 590-20818/1004
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 20818
Gasoline 1000 1110 ug/L 111 80 -120
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)68.7 -141
Surrogate
100
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 590-20818/1014
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 20818
Gasoline 1000 1120 ug/L 112 80 -120 1 20
Analyte
LCSD LCSD
DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec.
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)68.7 -141
Surrogate
101
LCSD LCSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 11 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Client Sample ID: MW-1:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-1
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 08:40
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 19:291 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 20818 02/05/19 19:29 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Client Sample ID: MW-2:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 12:06
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 19:501 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 20818 02/05/19 19:50 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Client Sample ID: MW-3:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 09:18
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 20:111 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 20818 02/05/19 20:11 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Client Sample ID: MW-4:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 10:09
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 20:321 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 20818 02/05/19 20:32 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Client Sample ID: MW-5:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-5
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 10:50
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 20:531 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 20818 02/05/19 20:53 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Client Sample ID: MW-6:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-6
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 11:25
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 21:141 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 12 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lab Chronicle
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Client Sample ID: MW-6:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-6
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 11:25
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis NWTPH-Gx MRS02/05/19 21:141 TAL SPK20818
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Client Sample ID: DUP:013019 Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-7
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 12:00
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 21:351 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Analysis NWTPH-Gx 1 20818 02/05/19 21:35 MRS TAL SPKTotal/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 590-10350-8
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 01/30/19 08:00
Date Received: 02/01/19 10:50
Analysis 8260C MRS02/05/19 21:561 TAL SPK20817
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 43 mL 43 mL
Laboratory References:
TAL SPK = TestAmerica Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 13 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: GeoEngineers Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Laboratory: TestAmerica Spokane
All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report.
Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date
Alaska (UST)17-02510State Program 03-07-19
Nevada State Program 9 WA012202019-1 07-31-19
Oregon NELAP 10 4137 12-07-19
Washington State Program 10 C569 01-06-20
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 14 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Method Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: 590-10350-1Client: GeoEngineers Inc
Project/Site: Kittitas County Shop/0504-119-00
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW8468260CVolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS TAL SPK
NWTPHNWTPH-Gx Northwest - Volatile Petroleum Products (GC/MS)TAL SPK
SW8465030CPurge and Trap TAL SPK
Protocol References:
NWTPH = Northwest Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
TAL SPK = TestAmerica Spokane, 11922 East 1st Ave, Spokane, WA 99206, TEL (509)924-9200
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 15 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Page 16 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: GeoEngineers Inc Job Number: 590-10350-1
Login Number: 10350
Question Answer Comment
Creator: Arrington, Randee E
List Source: TestAmerica Spokane
List Number: 1
N/ARadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
meter.
Lab does not accept radioactive samples.
N/AThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
N/ASample custody seals, if present, are intact.
TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
TrueSamples were received on ice.
TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.
TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.
TrueCOC is present.
TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.
TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.
TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
TrueSamples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
HTs)
TrueSample containers have legible labels.
TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.
TrueSample collection date/times are provided.
TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.
TrueSample bottles are completely filled.
N/ASample Preservation Verified.
TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
TrueContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
<6mm (1/4").
TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.
TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.
N/AResidual Chlorine Checked.
TestAmerica Spokane
Page 17 of 17 2/12/2019
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
APPENDIX C
Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
C- March 7, 2019| Page C-1 File No. 0504-119-01
APPENDIX C
REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE 1
This Appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report.
Environmental Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons and Projects
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Ecology). This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not
applicable to other sites.
GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, an
environmental site assessment study conducted for a property owner may not fulfill the needs of a
prospective purchaser of the same property. Because each environmental study is unique, each
environmental report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. No one except
Ecology should rely on this environmental report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report
should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated.
This Environmental Report is Based on a Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors
This report has been prepared for the Kittitas County Lower Shop located at 505 West 14th Avenue in
Ellensburg, Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project-specific factors when
establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates
otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was:
■ not prepared for you,
■ not prepared for your project,
■ not prepared for the specific site explored, or
■ completed before important project changes were made.
If important changes are made after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity
to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation, as
appropriate.
Reliance Conditions for Third Parties
Our report was prepared for the exclusive use of Ecology. No other party may rely on the product of our
services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. This is to provide our firm and Ecology with
reasonable protection against open-ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise
be no contractual limits to their actions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services
have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with Ecology and generally accepted environmental
practices in this area at the time this report was prepared.
1 Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org.
C- March 7, 2019| Page C-2 File No. 0504-119-01
Environmental Regulations are Always Evolving
Some substances may be present in the site vicinity in quantities or under conditions that may have led, or
may lead, to contamination of the subject site, but are not included in current local, state or federal
regulatory definitions of hazardous substances or do not otherwise present current potential liability.
GeoEngineers cannot be responsible if the standards for appropriate inquiry, or regulatory definitions of
hazardous substance, change or if more stringent environmental standards are developed in the future.
Uncertainty May Remain Even After This Phase II ESA is Completed
No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for contamination in connection with a
property. Our interpretation of subsurface conditions in this study is based on field observations and
chemical analytical data from widely-spaced sampling locations. It is always possible that contamination
exists in areas that were not explored, sampled or analyzed.
Subsurface Conditions Can Change
This environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The
findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by manmade events such
as construction on or adjacent to the site, by new releases of hazardous substances, or by natural events
such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers
before applying this report to determine if it is still applicable.
Most Environmental Findings are Professional Opinions
Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations and chemical analytical data
from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at
those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and
laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface
conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ – sometimes significantly – from
those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a
warranty of the subsurface conditions.
Do Not Redraw the Exploration Logs
Environmental scientists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs
and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in an environmental report should
never be redrawn for inclusion in other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproductions are
acceptable but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk.
Read These Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices
(geotechnical engineering, geology and environmental science) are far less exact than other engineering
and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could
lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory “limitations”
provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how
these “Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use” apply to your project or site.
C- March 7, 2019| Page C-3 File No. 0504-119-01
Geotechnical, Geologic and Geoenvironmental Reports Should Not be Interchanged
The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from
those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical
engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or
recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated
contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns
regarding a specific project.
Biological Pollutants
GeoEngineers’ Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, prevention or assessment
of the presence of Biological Pollutants. Accordingly, this report does not include any interpretations,
recommendations, findings, or conclusions regarding the detecting, assessing, preventing or abating of
Biological Pollutants and no conclusions or inferences should be drawn regarding Biological Pollutants, as
they may relate to this project. The term “Biological Pollutants” includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi,
spores, bacteria, and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts.
If Ecology desires these specialized services, they should be obtained from a consultant who offers services
in this specialized field.
GEOENGINEERS�