The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-09-27-minutes-public-works-study-sessionKITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Public Works Study Session Regular Meeting Monday September 27, 2021 -1:30 PM Commissioners' Auditorium and Webex 205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg 1. Call to Order 2. Towns to Teanaway Discussion I Other business 4. Adjourn Created on 9/24/2021 7:34:58 AM iael by:" KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION MINUTES In -Person and Webex Regular Meeting 1:30 PM September 27, 2021 Board members present: Chairman Brett Wachsmith and Commissioner Cory Wright Others In -Person: Nicole Ogan, Josh Fredrickson, Rebecca Cruse, Public Works; Dan Carlson, Community Development Services. Others Virtual: Mike Flory, Jessica Miller, Community Development Services; Neil Caulkins, Prosecuting Attorney's Office;(2) Members of the Public. At 1:34 pm Chairman Brett Wachsmith opened the Public Works Study Session. TOWNS TO TEANAWAY DISCUSSION Nicole Ogan updated the Board of County Commissioners on the history of Towns to Teanaway. Nicole Ogan state that the Towns to Teanaway project is seeking County sponsorship for trailhead construction improvements. Discussion was held. Staff was directed to prepare enabling documents for Board consideration. Meeting adjourned at 1:30 pm. Rebecca Cruse, Administrative Assistant 2021-09-27 Minutes KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Brett Wachsmith, Chairman KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: September 27, 2021 TOPIC: Towns to Teanaway ACTION REQUESTED: Direction to Staff LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook and Nicole Ogan RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff prepare enabling documents accepting sponsorship of Towns to Teanaway Trail (TtoT) Network. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • In 2019, Public Works (PW) briefed the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) on a request from Towns to Teanaway regarding third party easements. • PW cannot hold third party easements by law. • PW can utilize our expertise and resources securing necessary easements from private landowners and is well suited to hold such easements if requested by TtoT. • TtoT sought sponsorship from Kittitas Parks and Recreation District No. 1 (KPRD 1) in 2019. • TtoT now desires revising County sponsorship of the trail network. BACKGROUND: The TtoT Corridor Master Plan (EXHIBIT 1) covers over 7,700 acres and spans over six miles at its widest dimension. The trail network provides a diverse variety of trials for many user groups at a range of experience levels. In 2019, TtoT attracted KPRD1 as project sponsor. As sponsor, easements may be held for TtoT and liability insurance is provided covering project operation and maintenance liabilities. KPRD1 has not held any easements for TtoT to date. The sponsor is also able to submit grant requests and manage grant funding. The recent action by the BoCC adopting the Recreation and Tourism plan for the County creates renewed interest by TtoT for project sponsorship consideration. DISCUSSION: Construction improvements to trailheads supporting the TtoT trail network are contemplated within the 2022 recreation capital facility plan (pending BoCC adoption). The pending trailhead construction provides additional support for sponsorship consideration. Sponsoring TtoT does not appear to create any undue liability against the County pursuant to Revised Code of Washington Chapter 4.24.2 10 (AKA recreational immunity from unintentional injures — EXHIBIT 2). Sponsoring TtoT provides valuable Page 1 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 expertise in trail development, management, and maintenance to the County as we implement the 2021 Kittitas County Recreation and Tourism Plan. The TtoT advisory board is expected to bring significant expertise to the County as we enter the recreational trail business sector. Sponsorship is consistent with Plan Element 1: Trail Systems — Objective. Actions Items 1. 1, 1.4 and 1.8. Public Works is well skilled in facilitating, drafting and holding private land access easements. FISCAL IMPACTS: Trailhead parking improvements are budgeted in the 2022 Parks and Recreation Fund Capital Facility Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Towns to Teanaway Master Plan Exhibit 2: RCW 4.24.210 Page 2 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 EXHIBIT 1: TOWNS TO TEANAWAY CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN Page 3 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 Introduction The landscape surrounding the cities of Roslyn, Cie Elum and Ronald, Washington is a beautiful forested landscape sloping down to the Cie Elum and Yakima Rivers. It is a popular place for residents and visitors to recreate and many existing trails have become a source of community pride. Currently the trails are somewhat disconnected and no overarching document exists to link the trails into a regional plan. This master plan seeks to be the guide for future trail development and guideline for recreational enhancements in the region. In 2017 the Economic Development Group of Kittitas County, in partnership with Kittitas County Parks and Recreation District No. 1, identified the Cie Elum Ridge as an ideal region for a trails master plan. The team hired J.A. Brennan Consulting team to work closely with the local public and private stakeholders to develop a plan and design for a stacked -loop trail system stretching from Ronald to Roslyn and Cie Elum with trailheads and signed routes originating in each community. Several public workshops were held in 2017 and 2018 and additional public outreach and design iterations are documented in the plan to ensure thorough understanding of the process that led to the final trail design concepts. The Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan covers over 7,700 acres and spans over 6 miles at its widest dimension. The comprehensive guide is intended to enhance the recreation opportunities for area residents, protect wildlife habitat and undisturbed natural areas on the site, and increase opportunities for tourism for the economic benefit of the community. Report Overview This report includes the following sections and the graphics for the final corridor master plan. • Project Management & Outreach • Site Analysis • Planning and Design Goals • Opportunities and Constraints • Potential Programmatic Uses and Facilities • Master Plan Description & Maps • References and Resources In addition, the report includes the following appendices. This useful background information and toolkits will act as a resource for future trail management and implementation. • Appendix A — Site Analysis (maps and graphics) • Appendix B — Public Process (meeting notes and outreach overview) • Appendix C — Alternative Concept Plans (maps) • Appendix D — Case Study Maps (examples of other trail network plans) • Appendix E — USDA Trail Standards (federal design guidelines for many trail types) • Appendix F — Wildlife Review (correspondence with WDFW) • Appendix G — Cost Estimate Project Benefits The Towns to Teanaway Corridor Trail Plan offers a unique opportunity to enhance trails throughout the project area for hiking, mountain biking, equestrian riding, cross country skiing, snow shoeing and snowmobiling. The final trail master plan provides a diverse variety of trails for many user groups at a range of experience levels. Experiencing the hillside forests through outdoor activity encourages locals and visitors to develop a connection to this special landscape. The project will provide economic benefits for the local community, improve public health and fitness, build community connections, protect the landscape, and improve the overall quality of life in Roslyn, Cie Elum, Ronald and beyond. Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p I 1 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Project Management & Outreach Because the project spans multiple jurisdictions, including public and private property, the management and implementation for the trail system is a monumental undertaking. The effort to develop a cohesive corridor plan was led by a Project Leadership Group (PLG) of local stakeholders and primarily managed by Craig Mabie, Kittitas County Park District Commissioner. Public and stakeholder involvement was extensive throughout the design process, with exceptional attendance at public meetings and strong participation in surveys. Additionally, the willingness of private land owners to work with the project to develop key trails and access points has contributed to the overall success and cohesion of this plan. The use of certain City lands was also helpful in this regard. The final project proposal has garnered general support from the local community and users from outside the area. Towns to Teanaway Corridor Project Leadership Group (PLG) Members Craig Mabie Commissioner - Position 2 P.O. Box 1064, Roslyn 98941 (206) 462-9315,(206) 794-1255, kprdpos2@gmail.com Winston Norrish P.O. Box 1064, Roslyn 98941 (206) 462-9315,(206) 794-1255, wnorrish@msn.com Darcy Batura The Nature Conservancy 110 E First St, Cie Elum, WA 98922 (509) 852-2508, darcy.batura@tnc.org Andy Baur The Western Conservation Project (406) 410-0366 andy@westconserve.org Landscape Architect and Planning Consultants • Jim Brennan, RLA, Project Manager • Tanja Wilcox, RLA, Landscape Architect • Tom Walker, Project Planner List of Stakeholders • Audubon (Deb Essman — Kittitas Field & Stream) • Business Community • City of Cie Elum • City of Roslyn • City of Cie Elum Community Members • Department of Natural Resources Nicky Pas! Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust 110 East First St, Cie Elum, WA 98922 (509) 656-4073 Nicky.pasi@mtsgreenway.org Jim Armstrong Economic Development Group of Kittitas County 221 E. 4th, Ellensburg, WA 98926 (509) 962-7244, jim@kittitascountychamber.com Jim Becker Suncadia Fund for Community Enhancement + Mountains to Sound Greenway Board j i m becker29@g ma i I.com Lauren Shuck 306 W 3rd St Cie Elum, WA 98922 509-674-6831 bingshuck@inlandnet.com • Jennifer Hackett, Manastash Mapping GIS • Dog Mushers, Non -motorized Council • Economic Development Group of Kittitas County • Ellensburg Cross -Country Ski Group • Equestrian Groups: Backcountry Horsemen, Roslyn Riders & Kittitas County Equestrian Group • Equestrian Outfitter Towns to Teanoway Corridor Master Plan p 12 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners • Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance (Yvonne Kraus) • Kittitas County Parks & Recreation District No. 1 Kittitas Groomers Council (Tim Penelerick) • Mountaineers • Mountains to Sound Greenways • Neighboring private land owners • Roslyn Bike Alliance • Roslyn Urban Forest Citizen Advisory Committee Public Involvement Goals • Suncadia • Teanaway Advisory Council Stakeholders • Teanaway Community Forest Advisory Committee • WA State Chapter, Snowmobile Association • WA State Groomers • WA State Horse Park • Wild Wanderers Group (Suncadia) (Kay Mabry) • Washington Trails Association From the outset of the project, the PLG sought to develop a master plan that reflects the following local goals through relationship -building and outreach with local residents and organizations. 1) Minimizes impacts to community and landowners 2) Develop support for the project 3) Develop a master plan that meets the PLG and community's needs Community Outreach Site Tours Numerous site tours were completed by the PLG and their team of designers. Local land owners and stakeholders also attended many of the site tours to share local knowledge and ensure accurate trail planning and documentation. Meetings, Workshops & Events Three community events were held at Putnam Centennial Center in Cie Elum Washington in 2017 and 2018. 1) The first meeting presented the team's site analysis, including documents issues & opportunities, goals and potential recreational program enhancement ideas. The goal of this meeting was to receive feedback on site conditions, project goals, and trail typology. This meeting was the first opportunity to show a regional map including motorized recreation opportunities. 2) The second public meeting focused on presenting and discussing a series of Alternative Concept Plans. Feedback on the positive and negative aspects of each alternative trail system plan were documented and integrated into the following design iteration. 3) At the last public event, the design team presented the Draft Master Plan and sought comments on how the plan reflected public expectations and if there were any changes desired before finalizing the plan in this report. Site Analysis Land Ownership The majority of the land within the project area is private land. Approximately two thirds of the Cle Elum Ridge area, including the ridgeline itself, is owned by Central Cascades Forest LLC (CCF). CCF lands are managed by The Nature Conservancy of Washington (TNC). TNC welcomes non -motorized public access and limited snowmobile use on its land. In all, TNC manages about 49,000 acres of CCF lands in the region that are interspersed (checkerboarded) with adjoining public lands. CCF lands were acquired Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 13 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by:1.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners from Plum Creek Timber Company in 2014 to protect their conservation, recreation and economic value. TNC is stewarding and restoring CCF lands while working to secure long term public and community ownership. The Roslyn Urban Forest (RUF) is 300 acres of City -owned public land, open to the public for hiking, mountain -biking, jogging, snowshoeing and cross-country skiing. A Land Stewardship Plan guides use and management of the forest. Northeast of the project area is the Teanaway Community Forest (TCF), owned by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The TCF abuts the TNC property. Concurrently with this planning effort, the DNR and the community were working on developing a trail master plan for the Teanaway, which this project could coordinate with and potentially connect to in the future. The Suncadia community and its trails lies directly adjacent to the project area and their organization is also interested in improved connections to trails on Cle Elum Ridge. Chris Martin, Roslyn resident and owner of "Baxter State Park LLC" property northwest of Roslyn, has provided a signed letter agreeing to the use of his property for trails crossing between the RUF and TNC lands. A property attorney was available at one of the public meetings to answer questions concerning personal liability. State law protects local landowners through "the recreational use immunity statute, RCW 4.24.210." With this statute, "landowners may open their lands for recreational use and be immunized from liability for unintentional injuries that occur on their land" (Source: "Liability Protection to Land Owners," by Kyle Silk-Eglit, MBPA real estate attorneys). The recreational use must be allowed without charging a fee of any kind. The master plan is based upon the principle that the Towns to Teanaway project will seek partnerships with private landowners to allow public trail crossings on their properties in order to strengthen the trail connections between Ronald, Roslyn and Cle Elum, Cle Elum Ridge and beyond. Topography The 7,717 -acre site is moderately sloped with occasional rock outcrops. The slopes between Ronald and Roslyn are more moderate than across the rest of the project area. Slopes are relatively gentle within the town centers of Ronald and Roslyn and fairly flat in Cle Elum. State Route 903 and Coal Mines Trail connecting the communities is at a consistently gentle gradient. The team used a slope analysis map to provide a useful overview of the steep slopes, mostly associated with stream corridors in canyons flowing down off of Cle Elum Ridge. The majority of the ridge is south facing, thereby providing a longer recreation season due to less snow and increased sunlight. Sons Highly erodible soils are located only in small pockets across the site. In general, soil erosion control is possible through the use of good trail design. In particular, trail design that manages stormwater and prevents gullying. Canyons and stream riparian corridor crossings should be minimized to the greatest extent possible, but when required, they must be located in places that minimize erosion. "In general, we've been trying to reduce or relocate trails and roads away from stream -adjacent areas. Any new trails that get put in should try to build them out of the riparian area and cross at, or near to, a 90 -degree angle with an appropriate water crossing structure." (Scott Downes, WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife) Vegetation Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 14 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Site vegetation communities were investigated by the team on numerous site visits. The predominant forest type is dry, Ponderosa pine and Douglas fir forest with an open understory of grasses, sedges, rose, ceanothus, and snowberry. The project area is within the Douglas -fir / common snowberry / pinegrass vegetation zone, where Douglas fir and Grand fir are the climax overstory species. This is a forest that has evolved with fire, has been modified by logging, and is a mature mid -to late -succession second -growth forest. Due to logging and fire suppression, some of the forest is dense and highly fire - prone. Some property owners have begun to implement "fire -wise" techniques to thin their woodlands between the mature pines and firs, thereby helping to reduce the chance of high-intensity, crown fires that would cause personal property damage and also endanger nearby communities. Frequent low- level fires, every 10-40 years, were very common in this forest type prior to fire suppression. Maintaining open forests is also ideal for foraging deer and elk. The TNC has been working on forest restoration to create a more resilient and diverse forest in this region. The Roslyn Urban Forest Land Stewardship Plan manages the forest with the aim of creating a "mosaic of open Ponderosa pine and Grand fir forest, with varying degrees of tree densities and canopy closures, low volumes of hazardous fuel, and adequate habitat opportunity for many species" (Source: Roslyn Forest Land Stewardship Plan, 2008). Wildlife The Recreation Corridor provides important habitat, breeding and nesting areas, and forage for variety of wildlife including ungulates, coyotes, wolves, raptors (including bald eagles), as well as numerous small mammals, songbirds, and other wildlife, including fish. The communities value wildlife and the natural open space of the Cie Elum Ridge area and seek to protect and enhance wildlife habitat and wildlife travel corridors between the Cie Elum River Corridor and the Teanaway Community Forest. Some of the key species found in the project area include elk, deer, wolves, spotted owls, and salmon. Riparian corridors are important wildlife habitat corridors that should be protected. These include: No 3 Canyon (above Ronald), No. 6 Canyon (above Roslyn), No 5 Canyon and Greens and Curry Canyons (above Cie Elum). Other important habitat is located on the lower elevation slopes between Roslyn and Ronald. The following sections introduce important habitat needs of species that should be considered when designing the trail system. targe Marnrrtals Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsonf) have a significant presence at the site. Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) are also found in the area, but the Cie Elum Critical Areas Ordinance doesn't identify a specific habitat area for them. Large predators, such as cougar (Felin concolor), black bear (Euorctos americanus) and wolves also use the site. Elk Elk (Cervus elaphus nelsons) are some of the largest and most critical herbivorous mammals to occur on the site. They occupy all three of the region's characteristic plant communities: low grasslands, sagebrush steppe and Ponderosa Pine open forests. Elk typically graze in young forests or in areas that have been recently logged. Young are born in the spring, securing and preparing calving grounds is of great importance during this time. In the summer, elk search for food in smaller groups and are more dispersed across the landscape, making them less vulnerable to predation. Threats to elk from people and predators (wolves) can be mitigated by avoiding creating new roads and trails that connect to known elk habitat areas and by controlling winter activities, including snowmobiling, cross country skilling and winter biking. Rocky mountain elk eat grasses and (orbs in the summer, grasses in the spring and fall, and grasses, Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 15 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners shrubs, tree bark and twigs during the winter, especially aspen (RMEF 2013). Closed canopy forests are used for forage in late summer, shelter, and as hiding cover from predators (Source: "Managing for Deer and Elk on Small Woodlands" WDFW). Thinning of the forest will promote growth of grasses and (orbs for elk forage, but dense forest vegetation is important in winter range for protection from predators. "...Reducing or eliminating disturbance from humans may be the most important way to help elk through winter months" (Source: "Managing for Deer and Elk on Small Woodlands" WDFW). "Hiding cover is very important on arid summer ranges especially if road density is high. In heavily roaded areas we should retain at least 50% cover on summer range" (Source: "Managing for Deer and Elk on Small Woodlands" WDFW). Access to springs and other water sources, such as the Cle Elum River, should be protected within 100' of scattered forage areas within the forest. Wolves Wolves have returned to Washington and there is a pack in the Teanaway river drainage. Their habitat area does not include the project area, but may be found in the vicinity on occasion. Wolves will use trails and roads that allow them access to prey, such as elk calving areas and winter range. Wolves are not much of a concern for recreation planning in the project area. "Cle Elum ridge is a high use area for cougars. To the extent possible, we should try to direct trails to several well used areas rather than many dispersed trails so we won't have people everywhere on the landscape that might push the cougars and their prey (deer) around too much" (Source: Scott Downes, DFW). Fish Rivers and streams in the region are home to Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus), Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus), Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscho) and Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Habitat protection measures include preventing sedimentation within fish -bearing water bodies, protecting highly erodible soils (particularly those of sandstone origin), and controlling drainage with rolling dips or drain dips with rock spillways. Spotted Owl The Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis) makes its home in the region's old growth forests. A threatened species as per the Endangered Species Act, the project can support the Spotted Owl by avoiding any trail construction and maintenance during the owl's nesting season (March -June). "There is an old spotted owl circle up on Cle Elum ridge, it is not believed to be currently occupied but might be in future years if we can recover populations. If the area were occupied, we'd want to reduce or eliminate noise from trail maintenance and construction from March -August. Similarly, we'd want to be careful about motorized recreation locations in the future if this area was found to be occupied in the future. Habitat wise, we wouldn't want to remove owl habitat for trail or road construction, so we'd need to microsite those areas" (Source: Scott Downes, DFW). Wildlife Management Recommendations Management of wildlife at the Cle Elum Ridge area will consist of protecting or enhancing forest and riparian habitat for fish and wildlife. Protect native forage, cover, nesting, and Benning vegetation and structure (cavity trees, down logs, etc.) for fish and wildlife species. Travel, dispersal, and migration corridors for wildlife will be protected to maintain habitat connectivity. "In general, we'd want to see well planned trails that minimized habitat disturbance and overall fewer trails, so less dispersed and more trails that were well planned and connected recreation in good spots" (Source: Scott Downes, DFW). Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 16 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Existing Trails Existing trails have been developed unofficially over years of use. Existing trails include the following: • Hiking Trails • Mountain Biking Trails • Equestrian Trails • Snowmobile Trails • Cross country ski trails Many existing trails are rutted by motorcycle and off-road vehicle use, or simply because they were created on timber fall lines. These trails were never intentionally developed for hiking or mountain biking use, with the exception of several user -developed trails which are shown on the map. Some trails may not be mapped if the private land owner has not granted permission for their use. TNC and other private landowners that make up the project site do not allow motorized use on their property, with the exception of the identified snowmobile trails. From Cle Elum Ridge the site connects north to the TCF, which is being developed with trails by the DNR with community input. Trail Classifications Existing trails were assessed and classified using the USDA Forest Service trail standards. The following is a summary of the general description of each of the trail classifications. Specific trail characteristics for each trail class are different depending on their designed use. Most of the existing trails are class 1 and 2 and offer a very limited variety of trail experience. • Trail Class 1 — Minimally Developed: indistinct, native material surfacing, natural obstacles, narrow, brushy, steep, no built structures • Trail Class 2 — Moderately Developed: distinct, native material surfacing, natural obstacles common, trail blockages cleared, vegetation may encroach, narrow, single lane, limited structures, route identification signs limited to junctions • Trail Class 3 — Developed: tread continuous and obvious, native or imported crushed rock, obstacles common but not substantial, vegetation cleared of trail, structures may be common and substantial, route identification atjunctions and along route, potential interpretive signs. • Trail Class 4 — Highly Developed: tread wide and relatively smooth, single lane with passing opportunities, some double lane, native or imported crushed rock, may be hardened, few obstacles, vegetation cleared outside trail, frequent structures, bridges as needed, trailside amenities, route identification at junctions and markers for reassurance, interpretive signs common, accessibility info at trailhead. Existing Roads & Access Limited vehicular roads exist in the project area. The main existing roads are the Rat Pack Uptrack and the Ridge Road, however, the Rat Pack Uptrack is gated. There are other roads within the project area but most of these are private development roads and are gated and closed for public access. Planning and Design Goals The PLG developed a vision statement and goals to help guide the design project. Vision Statement "We love this place for its natural beauty and the opportunities to head outside and explore. We want to create recreational routes that make the area accessible and we want to balance that Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 17 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners access and spread it out so that we are careful to not destroy the very thing that we love. Trails can take people to great places and trails can route people and impacts away from other areas, like priority wildlife and habitat corridors." Project Goals • Develop partnerships with private landowners for public trail use • Create new and enhance existing wildlife corridors, and foster regional environmental stewardship • Develop a public, stacked loop trail system • Design lively trailheads that can serve as economic drivers for the region • Ensure new trails are sustainable and low maintenance • Work with volunteers to develop and maintain trails • Ensure non -motorized and snowmobile trails adhere to standard policies of TNC • Create accessible trails and trailheads • Create recreation opportunities to build a healthy community • Minimize impacts to the local community Opportunities and Constraints A massive project like the Teanaway Corridor trail plan is built upon existing conditions that provide positive opportunities while also limiting the practicality of some design concepts. See Opportunities and Constraints Map in the Site Analysis Appendix for additional observations. Opportunities: • Build on existing system of trails in Roslyn Urban Forest • Connect to trails on the Teanaway Community Forest (TCF) • Create destination viewpoints along Cle Elum Ridge: at Wedding Rock and at ridge connections to the Teanaway valley. Constraints: • Protect critical wildlife habitat in Canyon 3 corridor, elk winter range, and other sensitive wildlife habitats. • Create a series of trailheads, at each community to protect private property and improve connections to The Nature Conservancy (TNC) forest lands Case Study Examples The following case study examples serve as models of different types of trail systems, some with solely mountain bike trails and some with a variety of user groups. These can help guide the discussion on what the appropriate mix of trail types could be for the Cle Elum Ridge trail system. The maps for these trail systems are included in the Case Study Appendix. • Tumut State Forest Mountain Bike Trails - limits the complexity by only identifying blue and black diamond trails • Helena Montana South Hills MTB trail network - 4 mountain bike trails are divided by difficulty levels: easy, medium, difficult and most difficult. Approximately 60% to 70% of the trails are "medium." • Port Gamble Trails - 25% green/easy trails; 25% black diamond/most difficult trails; 50% blue/intermediate trails; shared use for hiking, mountain biking and horseback riding. • Whistler Trail System - mountain bike trails, hiking trails, hiking & mountain bike shared use trails, and mountain bike park; majority of trails are blue/"challenging", some green/"somewhat challenging" trails and some black diamond/"difficult" trails (mainly in mountain bike park). Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 18 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Potential Programmatic Uses and Facilities Program Uses and Trail Typology Prior to the development of alternative plans, a recreational program was developed to guide the initial design. The following program items were considered. Trail Types To be consistent with the vision of the Kittitas County Park, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, the trail master plan will be for a system of trails that include a range of mountain bike trail types that serve people with varied physical abilities and skills, walking and hiking trails that serve people with varied physical abilities and skills, equestrian trails and snowmobile trails. Note that the trail system will be developed primarily on private, The Nature Conservancy -managed land that is designated only for non - motorized recreation and limited snowmobiling. • Hiking Trails • Mountain Biking Trails • Equestrian Trails • Snowmobile Trails • Cross Country Skiing Trails • Snowshoe trails Trail (lassifications Classified using the USDA Forest Service trail standards. (Note that the Washington State DNR trail standards are consistent with and reference the USFS trail standards.): • Trail Class 1 - Minimally Developed • Trail Class 2 - Moderately Developed • Trail Class 3 - Developed • Trail Class 4 - Highly Developed See Site Analysis section above, for summary description of each Trail Class. Proposed Trail Typology for Alternative Plans Mountain Bike Trails • Black Diamond - USFS Trail Class 2 and some Class 1 (most difficult) (single mode) (downtracks for mountain bike use only) • Blue/Intermediate - USFS Trail Class 3 (single mode) (downtracks for mountain bike use only) • Green/Easiest - USFS Trail Class 4 (potential shared use) Hiking Trails • Black Diamond - USFS Trail Class 2 and some Class 1 (most difficult) • Blue/Intermediate - USFS Trail Class 3 (single mode) • Blue/Intermediate - USFS Trail Class 3 (shared hikers & equestrians) and some for shared hikers and mountain bikes • Alternatively, consider creating a mix of Class 2 and Class 3 trails that are not identified separately on the map. Multi -Use Trails • Blue/Intermediate - USFS Trail Class 3 (Multi -use: mountain bikes, hikers, some ADA, equestrian, and winter uses) • Green/Easiest - USFS Trail Class 4 (Multi -use: mountain bikes, hikers, some ADA, equestrian, and winter uses) Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 19 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Winter snowmobile and Cross-country Ski Trails • USFS Trail Class 2: 2'-4' ungroomed, minimum 3' wide structures, obstacles uncommon, target grade: 5%-15% (Is this too steep? If so, Class 3 would be more appropriate.) Equestrian Trails • Consider selecting only one trail class for equestrian trails. Potential Class 2 Amenities • Wayfinding signs in town centers and other key locations • Interpretive signs: historic and cultural • Trail head / Gateway: o Sign Kiosk with Trail System Map o Parking (Passenger Vehicles, including ADA) o Restroom c Trash Receptacle o Interpretive Sign • Picnic areas • Car/truck and trailer parking and turn-arounds • Bus and van parking • Viewpoints Master Plan Description The trails master plan for Towns to Teanaway is the result of over 18 months of collaboration with the Towns to Teanaway Corridor Project Leadership Group (PLG) and the local communities of Roslyn, Cle Elum and Ronald. Two alternatives for the trail design were developed and presented to the PLG and to the public. After feedback from this process and further collaboration, Alternative 2, "The Playful Loop Concept," was chosen as the preferred alternative. This plan option was further refined to incorporate input received through PLG meetings, public meetings, and comments from other stakeholders. The final plan graphic is shown on the fold -out maps in this section. The master plan trail system evenly disperses trail routes between the towns of Roslyn, Cle Elum and Ronald to provide exceptional access and recreation opportunity for all three communities. There are three separate trail types to fit the needs of hiking, mountain biking, equestrian, and winter uses. The trails will connect the towns to the Main Ridge Road and beyond into the Teanaway Community Forest. This organized trail system will enable multiple recreation uses to coincide together and offer both local and visiting users active and passive ways to enjoy this beautiful forest. Breathtaking views from the trails include Mt. Adams, Mt. Rainier and into the Teanaway. Views of the Stuart Range from Cle Elum Ridge are nothing short of spectacular and well worth the climb. Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 110 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners r; 1 VIEW OF MT. STUART \ TEANAWAY COMMUNITY FOREST (DNR) J u VIEW OFTCF I / \� THE NATURE I CONSERVANCY 1 / / BOUNDARY r DING 'IMMATURE •CONSERVANCY AI !p RO BOUNDARY EASIEST 'TD� HIKING ANO z "` HIKING AND BIKING ONLY li- �`� 4805 Q• (� EQUESTRIAN ` .',��'' t ` (J- '' F �s %a �. LEGEND 40 MULTI-USETRAIL j I .�•. ____ .1 EQUESTRIAN HIKING BIKING _ HIKING TRAIL +� MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAIL MOUNTAIN BIKE DOWN TRACK HIKING AND BIKING ONLY SUNCA EXISTING TRAILS TO REMAIN TRAILS TO BE DECOMMISSIONED GREEN/EASIEST 2-10% PROJECT AREA BLUEANTERMEDIATE 3-12% ♦ BLACK DIAMOND 5-25% TRAILHEAD �D PARKING TRAILHEAD �wM RIyF� WAYFINDING SIGNAGE VIEWPOINT TOWNS TO TEANAWAY CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN y 1029/201a 10, Scale: I' 600' - _--. M* PROJECT AREA WEST - MASTER PLAN - PLAYFUL LOOP CONCEPT ON%? 600 --1200' TOWNS TOTEANAWAYCORRIDOR ,. r`✓ �,a, Brennan PROJECT LEADERSHIP GROUP TEANAWAY COMMUN TY FOREST DNR .� �. THE NATURE THE NATYjtE < s CON CONSERVANCY Q` ., BOUNDARY 07 NATU COHSE Z� A `>. 14 n G � , 'it� \ / 1� ;v u 1 cam. %�— t you ,VISTA DEVELOPM9NT HOA D LOP YAKIMA RIVER [/ LEGEND CLE EWMHIGH SCHOOL MULTI-USE TRAIL ` ��^�/,`�,•�, b �� EQUESTRIAN HIKING GENERAL LEGEND .••• •• / .l BIKING HIKINGTRAIL �•«•°••• DA PARK MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAIL WASIiFNGTONSTATE MOUNTAIN BIKE DOWN TRACK = Tem m� SPA P� a�fe� g HORSE PARK �� HIKING AND BIKING ONLY t EXISTINGTRAILSTOREMAIN °° "°" °o1n1o7n1^•' SUNCI IA -pm.e — % TRAILS TO BE DECOMMISSIONED GREEN/EASIEST 2-10% Pmoiay cw..° T..p. E" 8Y Hlphr". ' BLUE/INTERMEDIATE3-12% :Y •J-• _ / 9akcletlRec°o1Ms gni c.r.,...» \ ?—w,�✓, BLACK DIAMONDS 25% •• ,Hbtork B°p°Inp. O TRAILHEAD OD PARKING TRAILHEAD \` WAYFINDING SIGNAGE — .. >r' VIEWPOINT TOWNS TOTEANAWAY CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN - 10/29/2018 Scale: 1'=600' lffooa EARID yyV��-�-�-—��' PROJECT AREA EAST MASTER PLAN PLAYFUL LOOP CONCEPT 0' 600' 700' TOWNCORR PROJECT TLEADER HIP GROUP j,a. brennan PROJECT LEADERSHIP GROUP Regional Connectivity Not only will this trail system connect the towns to their beautiful surroundings, it will provide a link between the towns. The Coal Mines Trail is currently the main connector between these communities but the addition of new loop trails will offer additional links between Roslyn, Cle Elum and Ronald. Residents will be able to hike or bike to neighboring towns while enjoying beautiful views and natural areas. Each Town will have excellent access to the Nature Conservancy Land. Private land owners have been extremely generous in providing easements across their property to connect each town to the Nature Conservancy (TNC) managed land, creating an easily accessible trail system for all communities. This plan offers the opportunity to connect to the Teanaway Community Forest and even beyond to U.S. Forest Service land and the Alpine Lakes Wilderness. Parking Lots & Trailheads The new trail master plan incorporates trailheads and enhancements for existing trailheads. Some key trailheads will offer parking and allow people to drive to them, while some may be accessed only by foot. Trailheads will provide a variety of amenities including vault toilets and information kiosks with maps and signage. The parking trailheads will provide better access for visitors driving in from outside the area and other smaller trailheads will be more tailored to local access. Wayfinding & Signage A hierarchy of signage to help users find their way will be implemented throughout the trail system. Each town will have a centrally located kiosk to direct people to the trail system and to summarize the recreation opportunities. Wayfinding signage will direct visitors to the parking areas and trail heads in each town. Smaller trail heads in the towns will not have signage and will be developed for the local community. At trailheads there will be an informational kiosk with signage that describes the trail type, distance of the trail, difficulty rating, and viewpoint destinations. Intersection points may have more minimal signage and only show direction, trail type, trail use and difficulty rating. Events The trail system will be a great opportunity for local events such as outdoor races, work group parties, and even small rustic weddings. Multi-purpose gathering areas can be integrated into the trail heads, viewpoints, and adjacent parks and meadows to create flexible event hosting facilities. The potential for event hosting will enhance the notoriety of the recreational amenities and boost the tourism economy of the region. List of potential races and events: • Volksmarch • Mountain bike events • Cycle -Cross bike races • School cross country races • CWU events • Cross country run • Equestrian events • Cross country ski races • Geology tours or other educational events Stewards of the Towns to Teanaway Corridor Trails should consider how event management and organization will take place. Online scheduling tools and designated part-time staff would be a benefit to ensuring successful event activities for years to come. Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 173 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Key Destinations and Viewpoints The plan highlights Wedding Rock along the Main Ridge Road as a popular destination and existing viewpoint. New viewpoints located on proposed trails will provide views into the Teanaway River valley, the Stuart Range, and south to Mount Rainier. General Road Closure Concepts This plan focuses on trail opportunities and does not address the management of roads, but old logging and mining roads could be an asset or a liability to trail implementation in the future. Historically, many of the roads within the project area were developed for natural resource mining or timber logging. Over the years many of these roads were abandoned while others have remained open for various levels of use. One key road labeled the Rat Pack Uptrack is a key trail route in the master plan. Along with recreational use, this road is used as a service road to access Cle Elum Ridge by TNC, communication companies, and fire crews. A fire break was developed along the Ridge Road in the summer of 2017 during a large fire event. This critical access route is gated and will remain open to vehicular use for management purposes by TNC, who owns the land, but it is also identified in the plan as open for non -motorized trail use. Private land owners including TNC can close roads on their property as they desire. New roads may be added for access as well. As part of the trail system management, permanent road closures may be desired. When needed, create a ditch at the road closure point and place boulders and logs as a visual and physical barrier. If needed, install a gate or other road -blocking methods. Temporary road or trail closures or re -location may be required by private land owners for timber management, fire suppression, and maintenance. Temporary road closures are not expected to impact established trail easements or corridors identified in this plan, because the design focuses on trail recreation connections that do not rely on roads. Master Plan Trail Typology and Level of Difficulty Four trail types with three trail difficulty designations are incorporated into the Master Plan. The parameters for difficulty levels are based on the US Forest Service Trail Design Parameters (USDA Trail Fundamentals and Trail Management Objectives), which are also consistent with the Washington State DNR trail standards. These standards provide a federally accepted basis for each trail design, to ensure that appropriate difficulty levels are allocated to each trail type. While based on the Forest Service trail standards, the standards for the TTC Master Plan have been tailored slightly to provide simpler, more streamlined parameters for ease of future implementation. For the hiking and mountain biking trails, there are black diamond (most difficult) and blue/intermediate (moderate difficulty) trails. The hiking and biking only trails are blue/intermediate or green/easy. All green/easy trails are multi -use trails, as many of these trails will traverse across the slopes and serve as connector trails. Multi -use trails may also have a blue/intermediate difficulty level since some of these trails climb to the ridge. The following outline provides more specifics on trail types and the gradient range within the difficulty level. Trail Types • Hiking Trails (only) • Mountain Biking Trails (only) • Hiking and Biking Only Trails • Multi -use Trails (Equestrian, Hiking, and Biking allowed) Trail Difficulty Levels • Black Diamond — Most Difficult • Blue/Intermediate — Moderate Level of Difficulty • Green/Easiest — Easy Level of Difficulty Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 114 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Hiking Trails The trails designated for hiking only are modest in length and climb to the ridge with approximately 1,500 -foot elevation gain. They provide a relatively easy hike, mostly due to the short length, but when rated through the standard trail rating system, the designations may slightly exaggerate the difficulty of the hike. • Black Diamond - USFS Trail Class 2 (most difficult) (single mode) 0 5-25% gradient range o Short pitch maximum: 40% o Maximum density pitch: 20-40% of trail o Native, limited grading. May be continuously rough • Blue/Intermediate - USFS Trail Class 3 (single mode) 0 3-12% gradient range o Short pitch maximum: 25% o Maximum pitch density: 10-20% of trail o Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading - intermittently rough. Mountain Bike Trails Black Diamond - USFS Trail Class 2 and some Class 1 (most difficult) (single mode) o Gradient range 5-20% c Short pitch maximum: 30%(50%on downhill segments only) o Maximum density pitch: 20-30% of trail Native with limited grading. May be continuously rough. Sections of soft or unstable tread on grades less than 5% may be common Blue/Intermediate - USFS Trail Class 3 (single mode) c Gradient range 3-10% o Short pitch maximum: 15% o Maximum density pitch: 10-20% of trail o Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading - intermittently rough. Section of soft or unstable tread on grades less than 5% may be present, but not common. Hiking and Biking Only Trails Green/Easiest - USFS Trail Class 4 (Multi -use: mountain bikers and hikers, some ADA (several will not allow equestrian use as noted on the plan), and winter uses 0 2-10%grad ient range o Short pitch maximum: 15% o Maximum pitch density: 5-20% of trail o Native with improved sections of borrow or imported material, and routine grading - stable with minor roughness Blue/Intermediate - USFS Trail Class 3 (Multi -use: mountain bikers and hikers) 0 3-12% gradient range o Short pitch maximum: 25% o Maximum pitch density: 10-20% of trail o Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading - intermittently rough. Section of soft or unstable tread on grades more than 5% may be present, but not common. Multi -Use Trails (Equestrian, Hiking, and Biking allowed) • Green/Easiest - USFS Trail Class 4 (Good for mountain bikes, hikers, some ADA, and winter uses) 0 2-10% gradient range c Short pitch maximum: 15% Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 115 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners o Maximum pitch density: 5-20% of trail 0 Native with improved sections of borrow or imported material, and routine grading — stable with minor roughness Blue/Intermediate — USFS Trail Class 3 (Multi -use: mountain bikes, hikers and winter uses) 0 3-12% gradient range o Short pitch maximum: 25% o Maximum pitch density: 10-20% of trail o Native, with some onsite borrow or imported material where needed for stabilization and occasional grading — intermittently rough. Section of soft or unstable tread on grades more than 5% may be present, but not common. Trail Operations, Maintenance, and Management Management of the overall trail system, including organization of ongoing maintenance and funding for the trails and trail heads, will be critical to the success of the project. Proper maintenance of the trail system will minimize user conflicts, improve the safety and recreation experience, and improve aesthetics. The effective stewardship of trail facilities depends not only on the quality of trail construction, but also on effective organization through a sound operations and maintenance plan. A holistic management plan for the trail system will help organize volunteers effectively, and may be a crucial consideration for donors and grant agencies interested in supporting the TTC. Tools for operational management could include an online maintenance log for tracking trail needs and project priorities for staff and volunteers. Operations The proper management of a trail system involves a guiding operations plan. The operations plan should include an inventory of trails to document trail type and purpose, estimated volume and season of use, and intended level of development. The plan should document appropriate trail management objectives to guide use of funds, as well as defining leadership roles and responsibilities for the system of trails, trailheads and facilities. Important aspects to consider include: which organization is responsible for overseeing facility and who within the organization would be most appropriate for managing the maintenance and operations? A good guide for this plan is the USFS's Trail Management Objective (TMO) form, which will help compile the information needed to develop the best management objectives for each trail. Input items include the trail type, the designed use, design parameters of the trail and the frequency of maintenance needed for efficient and safe operations. It is important to remember that TMO's are not static documents, and should be updated on a regular schedule to include new information. Trail closure and decommissioning: As new trails are constructed and old trails rerouted, every effort should be made to close and decommission the routes they are replacing. This is critical to ensuring there is not a proliferation of trails and that old, poorly located trails do not continue to impact the land. Many resources exist to guide successful trail decommissioning. Key steps include installing erosion control structures and fully scarifying and "disguising" the old route to make it less noticeable and attractive to the trail users. In some cases, signage will be needed to inform trail users why the former route was closed and a new route was established. Maintenance The maintenance of a trail system includes the various activities involved in keeping the trail in a safe, usable condition. This includes numerous efforts ranging from root cutting and brush removal, to Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 176 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners replacement of damaged signs or benches, to reconstruction of the trail. Lifetime trail maintenance will place ongoing costs on the operating agency, and this should be considered during the trail planning and funding process. The responsibility for TTC trail maintenance and operations may be assigned in part or whole to the project planning partners: • Kittitas County Park District • Volunteers • The Town of Roslyn • User groups • The town of Cle Elum 0 Private land owners Many resources exist for creating the TTC's preferred maintenance program. The following recommendations include practices adapted from the US Forest Service (USFS)'s Trail Construction & Maintenance Notebook (2007). Additional resources are listed in the References and Resources section. Trail Head Maintenance The trail head parking lots will require trash removal from trash receptacles, grading of crushed rock parking lots, gate closures, periodic pumping of vault toilets, and landscape maintenance. Interpretive kiosks will need periodic cleaning and replacement of trail maps. Fallen Tree Removal (Logging Out) Fallen trees can be trimmed and the log pieces can be rolled off the trail on the downhill side. Never leave them across ditches or water bar outflows. If you leave logs on the uphill side of the trail, turn or bury them so they won't roll or slide onto the trail. Root & Stump Removal Leave flush, perpendicular roots in place. Remove parallel roots, and perpendicular roots that are not flush with the trail tread. Use a sharpened pick mattock to chip away at the roots. For stumps, use stump grinders or explosives. Rock Removal Use rock bars, pick mattocks, sledge hammers, assorted motorized equipment (winch & cable systems, rock drills, etc.), and/or chemical and blasting agents to move or remove rocks. Remove rocks to a depth of at least 4" below the tread surface rather than cutting a rock flush with the trail to prevent obstacle formation. Do not kick stones loose. Consider closing trails to public use while rock removal is taking place, and constructing log barriers to intercept rolling loose rock. Slough & Berm Management Loosen compacted slough with a mattock, then remove the soil with a shovel. Reshape the tread to restore an out slope (cross slope that drains to outside or downhill edge). Avoid disturbing the entire backslope (excavated, exposed area above the tread surface), unless it is absolutely necessary to do so. Chop off the toe of the slough and blend the slope back into the hillside. Compact the tread thoroughly. Remove berms with similar tools to sloughs. Reshape the tread to restore an out slope and compact thoroughly. If berms persist, consider shaping the tread to an in sloped condition. Berms are problematic in forming false edges and accelerating erosion. Tread Upkeep Clear debris such as sticks, stones and litter often. If damaged by landslide, uprooted trees, washouts or boggy conditions, reshape tread according to trail design widths & restore out slopes. Sign Upkeep Sign maintenance consists of remounting loose or fallen signs, repairing or replacing signs, and resetting or replacing leaning, damaged, rotting, or missing posts. Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p I 17 of26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners If a sign is missing, a replacement sign should be ordered and installed. Consider why the sign is missing. If the sign was stolen, consider using theft -resistant hardware to mount its replacement. If the sign was eaten by wildlife, consider less palatable materials. If weather or natural events damaged the sign, consider stronger materials, a different location, or a different system for mounting the signs. For signs mounted on trees, you may need to loosen the lag screws slightly to give the tree growing room. If the sign is on a post, check to make sure that it is snugly attached. Replace rotting posts. Don't just try to get through "one more season." Consider the consequences of not repairing or replacing deficient signs. Weed Control / Management Weeds should be controlled at the site to the extent possible. Educational signage should be considered at trail heads to limit weed invasion. Trail users can introduce weed seeds onto the site. Horse feed is one of the issues that should be addressed in educational signage. Noxious weeds will need to be controlled in keeping with the Kittitas County Noxious Weed Control Board. This link provides information on noxious weed control: https://www.co.kittitas.wa.us/noxious- weeds/default.as_px. Implementation Matrix As a tool for managing the operations and maintenance of the TTC system, the attached figure lists trail segments broken into three zones. The matrix and zone plan map should be used together to assist with future implementation including developing cost estimates, construction strategy, and maintenance schedules. Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 178 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Typical Maintenance Needs & Example Trail Schedule Maintenance Activity Weekly Monthly Quarterly Annually Optimal Frequency Spring/Fall After Storm Notes General 1. Safety Inspection W X 2. General debris & trash pick up W X 3. Vandalism inspection W 4. Encroachments Ongoing Pavement / Surfacing Repair 1. Survey A S/F 2. Crack sealing Reactionary 3. Patching As Needed 4. Seal As Needed 5. Reconstruct As Needed 6. Repaint markings As Needed Vegetation Management 1. Mowing (clear zones, trailhead areas W/M 2. Brush trimmin loverhead trimming A S 3. Sight line trimming at intersections W Roads, other trails 4. Tree removal X As Needed 5. Trail sweeping / blowing S/F 6. Clear zone weed control As Needed 7. Seeding S 8. Root cutting As Needed Drainage 1. Erosion repair Q S X 2. Culvert/catch basin clearing Q X 3. Ditch maintenance (clear debris, trash, etc) A S X 4. Standing water repair A X Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 119 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners - . VIEW OF NIT.STUART TEANAWAY COMMUNITY FOREST (DNR) VIEWOFTCF I ��,_ THE NATURE j y CONSERVANCY BOUNDARY if I J N, • _y ✓-f DING THE NATURE♦ O 0� CONSERVANCY ,oI `: Al Ip R `BOUNDARYa•*•�,% rplrD i r V gA i v �: B 398 4A \\ 346'ol, SA 8A A '�• 2 ��►. HIKING AND � HI �� KINfiAND : -BIKING ONLY 10A w fiC K ROS RBAN ORESTA. .�+" •�• Z � p 11A , 4 EQUESTRbIN/�,� 01 Qz 2A (i 0 _ 3 `y `• •• !_ I �Q �C 1MULTI-USE TRAI,90 PARK RESTROOM low— s, LEGEND °Qolmu>i MULTI-USE TRAIL LD EQUESTRIAN HIKING -- � BIKING HIKINGTRAIL MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAIL MOUNTAIN BIKE DOWN TRACK _-r HIKING AND BIKING ONLY SUNCA EXISTING TRAILS TO REMAIN TRAILS TO BE DECOMMISSIONED (; GREEN/EASIEST 2-10% MOJECT AREA BLUE/INTERMEDIATE 3-12% ♦ BLACK DIAMOND 5-25% TRAILHEAD dD PARKING TRAILHEAD 3M RiVp WAYFINDING SIGNAGE VIEWPOINT TOWNS TO TEANAWAY CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN10/29/2018 Style: 1=600' PROJECT AREA WEST - ZONE PLAN - PLAYFUL LOOP CONCEPT 0 12W TOWNSTOTEANAWAYCORRIDOR j,a. brennan PROJECT LEADERSHIP GROUP i TEANAWAY COMMUNITY FOREST (bNR)J, •, ,. THE NATURE �THE NATURE CONSERVANCY � P/ • CONjkVANCY � p BOUNDARYNVIINDA i i' •� r O y Aq 4,1f - 1 'T • �_ M GRE �9'yj,0 �2� "yc00.. ^..f4 \ /OE CITY HEIGHTS ✓J , VISTA DEVELOPMENT HOA DEVELOPMENT.-N .e . CLE EL M 20C { . TR�11�E� D�5 TRAILH D 6 YAKIMA RIVER POLEPARKa� f. '1 • TuW CITYVARK TRAI I 0 L Sa 9iO3 Q - NES J a r p� I '� `• IpTTTIC((l1T(1,1(i1i1TTYTlfi r-` / i LEGEND CLE EWM HIGH SCHOOL A ` MULTI -USE TRAIL EQUESTRIANO' s�K�N� GENERAL LEGEND HIKINGTRAIL ala•• PARK I'MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAIL WASHINGTON STATE MOUNTAIN BIKE DOWN TRACK "a« -1-P., , HOMPARK� HIKING AND BIKING ONLY 5 w`� NCIH IA EXISTING TRAILS TO REMAIN «W. Points ofInt°..•t ................. ID TRAILS TO BE DECOMMISSIONED a Rw�Iro.d LMes GREEN/EASIEST2-10% nlya wra. EMyBLbMIpA.p f / BLUE/INTERMEDIATE 3-12% \ _ �'/,� ♦ BLACK DIAMOND 5-25% TRAILHEAD g : pD PARKING TRAILHEAD �.,.. v _ 0• ". ' �`� WAYFINDING SIGNAGE a..F.. .<,.... � p^^^•^ ........... VIEWPOINT TOWNS TO TEANAWAY CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN10/29/2018 _ _ s�ole:-I, �=boo' ' PROJECT AREA EAST - ZONE PLAN - PLAYFUL LOOP CONCEPT py,06 0' 1200 TOWNS TO TEANAWAY CORRIDOR I,a, brennan / PROJECT LEADERSHIP GROUP 1 „ 'I.. TTC Trail Management and Implementation Matrix Worksheet Instructions: This matrix is a tool for the TTC to manage maintenance and implementation for the project trails identified in the Master Plan. Trails are listed by their Zones (A, B, and C) and locations are identified on the plan graphic. This tool can be used to consider a variety of implementation scenarios, track project completion, and assign maintenance tasks. To use the table as a planning tool, begin by identifying trail implementation priorities. To understand the scope and limitations of each trail segment implementation, describe maintenance needs and assign a person or organization to complete the maintenance. (1) 5,280 ft in 1 mile. (2) High Priority= Implementation within 0-2 Years I Medium= 2-6 Years I Low= 6-20 Years. (3) See example maintenance schedu TRAILS -ZONE A Description Maintenance Primary Length (ft)* Project Priority(" Needs (2) Responsibility Description Length (ft)(') Project Priority(2) Maintenance Needs (3) Primary Responsibility Trail 1A (multiuse intermediate) 6,672 (High) (Brush Clearing) (Volunteers/staff Trail 2A multiuse intermediate 8,250 "Medium) (Resurfacing) frcmXYZ Or ) Trail 3A multiuse intermediate 6,552 Loin Erosion re air 3,857 Trail 4A (mountain bike down track intermediate) 5,675 Trail 12B mountain bike down track intermediate (Root cutting) Trail 13B mountain bike down track intermediate Trail 5A multiuse intermediate 1,094 1,312 Trail 15B multiuse easy) 3,621 Trail 6A multiuse intermediate 2,234 Trail 17B multiuse easy) 2,477 Trail 18B mountain bike down track intermediate Trail 7A (hiking intermediate) 3,451 2,378 Trail 20B (multiuse intermediate) 1,690 Trail 8A(hiking intermediate 6,818 Trail 22B(hiking intermediate 1,930 Trail 23B (hiking intermediate) Trail 9A mountain bike down track intermediate 6,222 2,579 Trail 25B mountain bike intermediate 1,212 Trail 10A (mountain bike intermediate) 2,031 Trail 27B multiuse intermediate 3,055 Trail 28B multiuse intermediate Trail 11A(hiking intermediate 5,845 2,585 Trail 30B multiuse intermediate 787 Total Length 54,844 (1) 5,280 ft in 1 mile. (2) High Priority= Implementation within 0-2 Years I Medium= 2-6 Years I Low= 6-20 Years. (3) See example maintenance schedu Towns to Teanoway Corridor Master Plan p 122 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners TRAILS -ZONE B Description Maintenance Primary Length (ft)* Project Priority(" Needs (2) Responsibility Trail 1 B(hiking intermediate 2,048 Trail 213 (mountain bike intermediate) 1,883 Trail 3B multiuse easy) 3,078 Trail 4B multiuse easy) 2,567 Trail 5B (multiuse easy) 4,146 Trail 613 multiuse easy) 1,784 Trail 713 multiuse intermediate 3,776 Trail 813 multiuse easy) 2,456 Trail 9B multiuse intermediate 5,687 Trail 10B multiuse easy) 3,857 Trail 11B (mountain bike down track intermediate 4,877 Trail 12B mountain bike down track intermediate 1,921 Trail 13B mountain bike down track intermediate 3,915 Trail 14B (multiuse intermediate) 1,312 Trail 15B multiuse easy) 3,621 Trail 166 multiuse intermediate 7,235 Trail 17B multiuse easy) 2,477 Trail 18B mountain bike down track intermediate 6,210 Trail 19B multiuse easy) 2,378 Trail 20B (multiuse intermediate) 1,690 Trail 21B multiuse intermediate 2,227 Trail 22B(hiking intermediate 1,930 Trail 23B (hiking intermediate) 7,659 Trail 24B mountain bike intermediate 2,579 Trail 25B mountain bike intermediate 1,212 Trail 26B multiuse intermediate) 2,333 Trail 27B multiuse intermediate 3,055 Trail 28B multiuse intermediate 1,340 Trail 29B (multiuse easy) 2,585 Trail 30B multiuse intermediate 787 Towns to Teanoway Corridor Master Plan p 122 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Trail 31B mountain bike intermediate 2,394 Trail 32B (mountain bike intermediate) 708 Trail 33B multiuse intermediate 2,685 Trail 34B(hiking intermediate 7,747 Trail 35B (multiuse intermediate) 2,713 Trail 36B mountain bike down track difficult 5,562 Trail 37B multiuse intermediate 1,231 Trail 38B (multiuse intermediate) 6,357 Trail 39B(hiking intermediate 6,639 Trail 40B(hiking intermediate 2,980 Trail 41B (multiuse intermediate) 5,505 Trail 42B (multiuse intermediate) 5,314 Trail 43B multiuse intermediate Coal Mines Tra 12,133 Total Length 154,593 Summary TRAILS - ZONE C Description Maintenance Primary Length (ft)" Project Priority") Needs (2) Responsibility Trail 1C(hiking intermediate 6,203 Trail 2C (multiuse intermediate) 885 Trail 3C multiuse intermediate 8,980 Trail 4C mountain bike intermediate 1,893 Trail 5C (multiuse intermediate) 1,389 Trail 6C mountain bike intermediate 3,093 Trail 7C mountain bike down track difficult 7,708 Trail 8C (multiuse intermediate) 4,192 Trail 9C multiuse intermediate 5,160 Trail 10C mountain bike intermediate 2,678 Trail 11C (mountain bike intermediate) 862 Trail 12C mountain bike intermediate 5,665 Trail 13C multiuse intermediate 1,449 Trail 14C (multiuse intermediate) 2,086 Trail 15C (mountain bike intermediate) 2,927 Trail 16C (multiuse easy) 1,013 Trail 17C multiuse intermediate) 1,316 Trail 18C (multiuse easy) 1,757 Trail 19C(hiking difficult 3,020 Trail 20C (hiking intermediate) 10,128 Trail 21C (multiuse intermediate) 2,708 Trail 22C mountain bike down track difficult 7,358 Trail 23C (mountain bike intermediate) 751 Trail 24C (mountain bike intermediate) 5,791 Trail 25C (multiuse easy) 1,358 Trail 26C (multiuse easy) 1,789 Trail 27C multiuse intermediate 1,095 Trail 28C multiuse easy) 2,985 Trail 29C (multiuse easy) 3,358 Trail 30C multiuse intermediate) 779 Trail 31C (multiuse easy) 1,671 Trail 32C (multiuse easy) 2,334 Trail 33C multiuse easy) (Coal Mines Trail) 13,148 Total Length 1 117,529 Summary Total Trail Distances LF Miles Total Multi -use Trail Distance 178.583 33.8 Total Hiking Trail Distance 64.468 12.2 Total Biking Trail Distance 83,915 15.9 Cumulative Total (All zones & trails) 326,966 61.9 Towns to Teanaway Corridor Master Plan p 123 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners Project Costs To prepare an estimate of probable construction costs for the TTC master plan, trails were divided into geographic zones and segments. These trail segments can be built over time and will help organizers phase in the full project implementation. The cost estimate is based on public bid and construct costs and is provided in 2018 US Dollars. The trail lengths are based on the trail layouts shown on the master plan graphic. See the Appendix for more detailed planning -level cost estimate breakdown and list of assumptions. Zone A Summary Mobilization Trails Trail Signage Trailhead 1 With Parking (Zone A - Ronald) $37,922.40 $260,509.00 $7,600.00 $107,115.00 Zone A Trailhead Landscape $0.00 Site Amenities $4,000.00 Subtotal $417,146.40 Total (including tax, O&P, contingency) $608,866.89 Total Including design & permitting (20%) $723,965.92 Zone B Summary Mobilization $104,763.18 Trails $734,316.75 Trail Signage $24,400.00 Trailhead 2 With Parking (Zone B - Roslyn) $16,000.00 Trailhead 3 With Parking (Zone B - Roslyn) $171,635.00 Zone B Trailhead Landscape $85,280.00 Site Amenities $16,000.00 Subtotal $1,152,394.93 Total (including tax, O&P, contingency) $1,682,035.63 Total including design & permitting (20%) $2,000,004.44 Zone C Summary Mobilization $109,622.78 Trails $558,262.75 Trail Signage $171,635.00 Trailhead 4 With Parking (Zone C - Cle-Elum High School Area) $171,635.00 Trailhead 5 With Parking (Zone C - Cle Elum) $171,635.00 Trailhead 6 With Parking (Zone C - Cle Elum) $16,000.00 Trailhead 7 With Parking (Zone C - Cle Elum) $107,115.00 Zone C Trailhead Landscape $53,300.00 Site Amenities $4,000.00 Subtotal $1,363,205.53 Total (Including Tax, O&P, Contingency) $1,760,059.43 Total Including Design & Permitting (20%) $2,092,777.70 Total TTC Project Summary Total (including tax, overhead & profit, and contingency) $4,050,961.94 Total including design & permitting (20%) $4,816,748.06 Towns to Teanoway Corridor Master Plan p 124 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. 1 Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners References and Resources Grant Funding Opportunities Federal Funding Sources • US Dept. of Housing & Urban Development - Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs) I Grants to improve community facilities and services, especially in low- and moderate -income areas. • US Dept. of Agriculture - Rural Development - Community Facilities Programs I Funds to construct, expand or improve facilities that provide health care, education, public safety, and public services. • National Parks - Land and Water Conservation Fund I Federal funding to State and Local agencies to safeguard natural areas, water resources and cultural heritage, and to provide recreation opportunities. • Federal Highway Administration — Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) & Recreational Trails Program (RTP) I The TA Set -Aside authorizes funding for programs defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non -driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities such as historic preservation and vegetation management, and environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity; recreational trail projects; and safe routes to school projects. State Funding Sources: WA Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) The Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office provides a variety of grants for enhancing recreation and habitat in Washington State. • Land and Water Conservation Fund ITo preserve, develop and assure accessibility to outdoor recreation resources including parks, trail, and wildlife lands. • Recreation Trails Program I Funding to renovate and maintain recreational trails and facilities that provide a backcountry experience. • Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) I Funding for local and state parks, trails, water access, state land conservation and restoration, farmland preservation, and habitat conservation. Foundation Grants & Other Private Funding: • Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance I Hosts trail building projects in Washington State <https://www.evergreenmtb.org/trails/projects> • Washington Trails Association I Gathers volunteers for trail work parties <https://www.wta.org/get-involved/volunteer> • National Recreation and Parks Association I Resource for parks and recreation funding sources. <www.nrpa.org/our-work/Grant-Fundraising-Resources/> • REI Conservation and Recreation Grants I Supporting outdoor access, trail construction, and community health through a variety of funding routes. <www.rei.com/stewardship/creating- access> • The Trust for Public Land I U.S. nonprofit organization with a mission to "create parks and protect land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. • Kresge Foundation I Grants for facility development, community health partnerships, developing healthy environments and more. • American Hiking Society's National Trails Fund i Grants to help build and protect hiking trails. Towns to Teanoway Corridor Master Plan p 125 of 16 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. t Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation I Working to improve the health and health care of all Americans, including investments in communities, children, and leadership programs. Further Reading USDA Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook, 2007 Edition <https://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf07232806/pdf07232806dpi72.pdf> USDA Trails Management Handbook (FSH 2309.18) & Amendments <https://www.fs. usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stel prd b5403600.pdf> USFS / USDA Trail Management Tools <http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/prog rams/trail-management/index.shtm I> • Trail Fundamentals and Trail Management Objectives • Trail Assessment and Condition Surveys (TRACS) • Standard Trail Plans and Specifications USFS/USDA Hand tools for Trail Work: 2005 edition <http://www.bch mt.org/documents/education/Ha ndtoolsforTra ilWork.pdf> Washington Trails Association: Trail Maintenance Resources <http://www.wta.org/get-involved/vol unteer/about-vol unteering/trail-maintenance-tool-and- techn iq ue-resou rces> Towns to Teanoway Corridor Master Plan p 126 of 26 Prepared for: Economic Development Group of Kittitas Co. & Kittitas Co. Parks and Recreation District No. t Prepared by: J.A. Brennan Associates, Landscape Architects & Planners EXHIBIT 2: REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON CHAPTER 4.24.2 10 Page 4 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 9/1/2021 RCW 4.24.200: Liability of owners or others in possession of land and water areas for injuries to recreation users—Purpose. RCW 4.24.200 Liability of owners or others in possession of land and water areas for injuries to recreation users—Purpose. The purpose of RCW 4.24.200 and 4.24.210 is to encourage owners or others in lawful possession and control of land and water areas or channels to make them available to the public for recreational purposes by limiting their liability toward persons entering thereon and toward persons who may be injured or otherwise damaged by the acts or omissions of persons entering thereon. [ 1969 ex.s. c 24 § 1; 1967 c 216 § 1.] https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=4.24.200 1 /1 9/1/2021 RCW 4.24.210: Liability of owners or others in possession of land and water areas for injuries to recreation users—Known dangerous artifi... RCW 4.24.210 Liability of owners or others in possession of land and water areas for injuries to recreation users—Known dangerous artificial latent conditions—Other limitations. (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) or (4) of this section, any public or private landowners, hydroelectric project owners, or others in lawful possession and control of any lands whether designated resource, rural, or urban, or water areas or channels and lands adjacent to such areas or channels, who allow members of the public to use them for the purposes of outdoor recreation, which term includes, but is not limited to, the cutting, gathering, and removing of firewood by private persons for their personal use without purchasing the firewood from the landowner, hunting, fishing, camping, picnicking, swimming, hiking, bicycling, skateboarding or other nonmotorized wheel -based activities, aviation activities including, but not limited to, the operation of airplanes, ultra -light airplanes, hang gliders, parachutes, and paragliders, rock climbing, the riding of horses or other animals, clam digging, pleasure driving of off-road vehicles, snowmobiles, and other vehicles, boating, kayaking, canoeing, rafting, nature study, winter or water sports, viewing or enjoying historical, archaeological, scenic, or scientific sites, without charging a fee of any kind therefor, shall not be liable for unintentional injuries to such users. (2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) or (4) of this section, any public or private landowner or others in lawful possession and control of any lands whether rural or urban, or water areas or channels and lands adjacent to such areas or channels, who offer or allow such land to be used for purposes of a fish or wildlife cooperative project, or allow access to such land for cleanup of litter or other solid waste, shall not be liable for unintentional injuries to any volunteer group or to any other users. (3) Any public or private landowner, or others in lawful possession and control of the land, may charge an administrative fee of up to twenty-five dollars for the cutting, gathering, and removing of firewood from the land. (4)(a) Nothing in this section shall prevent the liability of a landowner or others in lawful possession and control for injuries sustained to users by reason of a known dangerous artificial latent condition for which warning signs have not been conspicuously posted. (i) A fixed anchor used in rock climbing and put in place by someone other than a landowner is not a known dangerous artificial latent condition and a landowner under subsection (1) of this section shall not be liable for unintentional injuries resulting from the condition or use of such an anchor. (ii) Releasing water or flows and making waterways or channels available for kayaking, canoeing, or rafting purposes pursuant to and in substantial compliance with a hydroelectric license issued by the federal energy regulatory commission, and making adjacent lands available for purposes of allowing viewing of such activities, does not create a known dangerous artificial latent condition and hydroelectric project owners under subsection (1) of this section shall not be liable for unintentional injuries to the recreational users and observers resulting from such releases and activities. (b) Nothing in RCW 4.24.200 and this section limits or expands in any way the doctrine of attractive nuisance. (c) Usage by members of the public, volunteer groups, or other users is permissive and does not support any claim of adverse possession. (5) For purposes of this section, the following are not fees: (a) A license or permit issued for statewide use under authority of chapter 7A.05 RCW or Title 77 RCW; (b) A pass or permit issued under RCW 79A.80.020, 79A.80.030, or 79A.80.040; (c) A daily charge not to exceed twenty dollars per person, per day, for access to a publicly owned ORV sports park, as defined in RCW 46.09.310, or other public facility accessed by a highway, street, or nonhighway road for the purposes of off-road vehicle use; and (d) Payments to landowners for public access from state, local, or nonprofit organizations established under department of fish and wildlife cooperative public access agreements if the landowner https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=4.24.210 1/2 9/1/2021 RCW 4.24.210: Liability of owners or others in possession of land and water areas for injuries to recreation users—Known dangerous artifi does not charge a fee to access the land subject to the cooperative agreement. [ 2017 c 245 § 1; 2012 c 15 § 1. Prior: 2011 c320§11;2011 c171 §2;2011 c 53 § 1; 2006 c 212 § 6; prior: 2003 c 39 § 2; 2003 c 16 § 2; 1997 c 26 § 1; 1992 c 52 § 1; prior: 1991 c 69 § 1; 1991 c 50 § 1; 1980 c 111 § 1; 1979 c 53 § 1; 1972 ex.s. c 153 § 17; 1969 ex.s. c 24 § 2; 1967 c 216 § 2.] NOTES: Findings—Intent-2011 c 320: See RCW 79A.80.005. Effective date -2011 c 320: See note following RCW 79A.80.005. Intent -2011 c 171: "This act is intended to reconcile and conform amendments made in chapter 161, Laws of 2010 with other legislation passed during the 2010 legislative sessions, as well as provide technical amendments to codified sections affected by chapter 161, Laws of 2010. Any statutory changes made by this act should be interpreted as technical in nature and not be interpreted to have any substantive policy or legal implications." [ 2011 c 171 § 1.] Effective date -2011 c 171: "Except for section 129 of this act, this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect July 1, 2011." [ 2011 c 171 § 142.] Finding -2003 c 16: "The legislature finds that some property owners in Washington are concerned about the possibility of liability arising when individuals are permitted to engage in potentially dangerous outdoor recreational activities, such as rock climbing. Although RCW 4.24.210 provides property owners with immunity from legal claims for any unintentional injuries suffered by certain individuals recreating on their land, the legislature finds that it is important to the promotion of rock climbing opportunities to specifically include rock climbing as one of the recreational activities that are included in RCW 4.24.210. By including rock climbing in RCW 4.24.210, the legislature intends merely to provide assurance to the owners of property suitable for this type of recreation, and does not intend to limit the application of RCW 4.24.210 to other types of recreation. By providing that a landowner shall not be liable for any unintentional injuries resulting from the condition or use of a fixed anchor used in rock climbing, the legislature recognizes that such fixed anchors are recreational equipment used by climbers for which a landowner has no duty of care." [ 2003 c 16 § 1.]. Purpose -1972 ex.s. c 153: See RCW 79A.35.070. Off-road and nonhighway vehicles: Chapter 46.09 RCW. Snowmobiles: Chapter 46.10 RCW. https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=4.24.210 212