Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-08-23-minutes-public-works-study-session
KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Public Works Study Session Regular Meeting Monday August 23, 2021 -1:30 PM Commissioners' Auditorium and Webex 205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg 1. Call to Order 2. 2021 Drought Outlook 3. Yakima River Access at South Thorp Highway 4.1-90 Exit 70 To 1-90 Exit 85 Preliminary Design Phase 1 5. Automated Traffic Safety Cameras 6. City of Ellensburg Connector Roads 7. American Public Works Association Conference Presentation 8. Other business 9. Adjourn Created on 8!20!2021 8:11:54 AM KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION MINUTES In -Person and Webex Regular Meeting MONDAY 1:30 PM August 23, 2021 Board members present: Chairman Brett Wachsmith, and Vice -Chairman Laura Osiadacz. Others In -Person: Mark Cook, Rebecca Cruse, Public Works; Dan Carlson, Community Development Services; Hilary Jensen, Member of the Public Others Virtual: Candie Leader, Public Works; Jessica Miller, Community Development Services; Neil Caulkins, Prosecuting Attorney's Office;(5) Members of the Public. At 1:38 pm Chairman Brett Wachsmith opened the Public Works Study Session.. 2021 DROUGHT OUTLOOK Mark Cook updated the Board of County Commissioners on the status of drought conditions expected to affect our region's local wells and water sources. Mark Cook stated that Public Works needs to explore policy formation and the options for the county as a water purveyor for cisterns and source for self -haul domestic water. Staff was directed to pursue drafting a policy. YAKIMA RIVER ACCESS AT SOUTH THORP HIGHWAY Mark Cook informed the Board that due to ownership changes at the KOA private access to the Yakima River has restricted River Guides from use. Mark Cook stated that local guides have asked for use of an access site owned by Public Works at the Dyer Pit off South Thorp Highway. Mark Cook continued that staff is looking for direction in possible development of a licensing process for allowing use, and updates to the access point. Staff was directed to bring forward a proposal including the benefits of licensing development, and how site restrictions would be implemented. Mark Cook added that he will work with the Prosecuting Attorney's office for assistance in development of said licensing agreement I-90 EXIT 70 TO I-90 EXIT 85 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE 1 Mark Cook gave background on the work and discussions had on the traffic impacts from I-90. Mark Cook stated that staff worked with the Ferguson Group to request legislative funds to add three (3) lanes to I-90. Mark Cook continued that staff's request was not 2021-08-23 Minutes approved because the project is not listed on the State Transportation Improvement Plan. Mark Cook added that staff researched how to get the project listed and Kittitas County needs to allocate funds before it will be added. Mark Cook requested direction on setting aside funding for the I-90 improvements from Exit 70 to Exit 85 to be placed on the 2022 State Transportation Improvement Plan. Mark Cook stated that funding options could include the Road fund to begin initial design. Staff was directed to do an inventory of possible funding sources and return for a discussion. AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS Mark Cook gave background on the research he conducted on the use of traffic safety cameras in Washington State. Mark Cook stated that currently the use is restricted. Mark Cook inquired on the interest in approaching State Representatives to begin initial phases of legislation to allow camera use for speed enforcement in Kittitas County. Vice Chairman Laura Osiadacz stated she has reached out to Representative Tom Dent for a discussion on this issue. AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE PRESENTATION Mark Cook informed the Board of County Commissioners that Public Works has been accepted as a presenter at the APWA Conference in Yakima, Washington. Mark Cook stated that Nicole Ogan, Environmental Transportation Planner will be presenting with Fehr and Peers on the challenges of rural traffic control along I-90 bypass roads, and introduction of STEER I-90 to a larger audience. Vice Chairman Osiadacz requests a link to view the presentation at the conference if one is provided after the conference Meeting adjourned at 2:14 pm. Rebecca Cruse, Administrative Assistant 2021-08-23 Minutes KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Brett Wachsmith, Chairman KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: August 23, 2021 TOPIC: 2021 Drought Outlook ACTION REQUESTED: Direction to Staff LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Begin planning for 2022 drought conditions. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • 2021 Drought conditions are worsening. • Warmer than normal temperatures with below normal precipitation are expected through November. • Declining stream flows are anticipated to impact surface water availability for irrigation by early fall 2021. BACKGROUND: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) drought forecasts in June were recently upgraded reflecting more serious persistent drought concerns. The June analysis suggested drier than normal conditions through September. The revised forecast now extends through November. The "Exceptional Drought" designation has been expanded for Eastern Washington clipping the easterly most portion of Kittitas County (EXHIBIT 1). DISCUSSION: It appears that the larger than normal snowfalls from winter 2020/2021 are adequately offsetting the irrigation demands for Kittitas County this growing season. This is not the case for much of Oregon. Current reservoir impacts in Oregon forebode potential future conditions for Eastern Washington. Staff had a growing concern for surface water rights that do not include access to Bureau of Reclamation water and for the potential for prorationing of Bureau supplies in 2022. The ongoing "warmer than normal" coupled with "less than normal precipitation" is driving river and creek levels downward from normal years. While significant adverse impacts this irrigation season will likely be avoided, staff believes it is prudent to begin planning for drought impact in the 2022 irrigation season. Staff proposes evaluating the 2019 water auction process and the policies surrounding availability of the County's Water Bank during declared drought. The Vantage area fire Page 1 of 3 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 in June of this year gave us a glimpse into impacts resulting from inability to supply livestock with water. Some small group domestic groundwater systems in other parts of the state have gone dry this summer. It might be prudent to begin policy development concerning how the County might make its water bank available supporting users beyond irrigators. A less than normal snowpack in 2021/2022 winter could have significant adverse impacts on Kittitas County agriculture. It is likely that Water Bank access will mandate a level of Washington State Department of Ecology review. Staff believes it is prudent to begin policy development in fall allowing sufficient review time by Ecology staff ahead of spring 2022. FISCAL IMPACTS: Undetermined at this time. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: NOAA Drought Outlook Summary August 11, 2021 Page 2 of 3 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 202I EXHIBIT 1: NOAA DROUGHT OUTLOOK SUMMARY AUGUST 11, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 0 Ln ra ca u2 ar rr, 0 a� CL dr— M3 Ln CL; N O N e CL � / ■ � § - $ t+a � §- ^ 2 §i\ a22 � �/ § § 1 $ Its �§ � !B a � � � � E E c r jrjpp P E E Ee Q Q g S Q O G 8gg n E E E - E E ji9Uyy U Us a U U U o f jjW =Y �Z N W Y h 7 o .r Z � � a v m� c� V Q Q Q 4 0 CdV • o� G C4 a 7� 6ianKings (S 8SG5-2pS0) M tr. 9 Y' 19 R 9 9 W Q _ m v v cn o t y cw ri, Q o t'r7 O7 O Q y O W Uel ? 'p to Qa - 3 7 N a u.i 4T t to w La y U �n y C 7C]. _ r N E 4 C7 i1 •� Wm Y.� y_ ki L C CU to [�J y t/7 tC} ice+ Ototwo aT V .0 Li Li _ m v v a) !O Ch 7 N a u.i 4T t La s A n N .may' V .fit z 0 0 ! 0 • 0 m om r "— r. G1 O e:1 . o� C L Q 37, M ti) o ra � Re LLA � 4) Ru � -I.-co -Ifo Q w A Q ro x -CDN m Cy O fa i a M v Ln a w C) V KA O 10 .� v Lo cu Lr � L \i • �j � /p R Sl A; C as � � � •a bl W :O � N � r d/ Cr r'wr S A 0 0 ! 0 • 0 m om r "— r. G1 O e:1 . o� C 0 �4 E 0 C E 6. o m E W m L u C O 0 0 LW m r we C a mm u _ im E a o L 0 0 a..+ L 0 0 U a �k *u CD LU r -L b a td Er �n.�n jig!oo e$ -,a, d b sad aA.s b was r N ■Q E 0 060 'ter u� OAg c --� m �mNm3�® aa• N c ° L Nltmommv m 3dV afJ2 M a C lPb R 'O y V 'a CL.0 IL Aw m!co 40mm 41602 N E I� G R w > m O �0•• 2 VJ y - O tI • f t E A i rye, tow i. H�;r s!`}i T N t. .Q E � .9C Z .080 0 rx H � 0 0 � t c '-- 0 c o 0,20 ' rr C 0 c '-- 0 c o 0,20 ' 0 C m �o,o _�-c � WaH 0 di C 0 4--p E *= o Let= L ', fuai 7 cu ru 4--p E E i J O O.i uJ = CL th �_ Ln Ln 2.. 4 �G 0 1. CL LA { D 0 0 � -0--' 6. L --f a = —0 O Ln 4-0 � M Q.1 E 4-1 Ln O EL M Ln i - 4- $.- CL +— lfi z V? L!0 4-1 4-4 '�. L orA m _cn ci1 to . M X3.1 C w O LnL o4-1 L" L .� LIQ .- L M 1 0 a Li 0 Ac V1 LA 0 < ' L LL- CL 4w *i _CL • u m C LA #+ cuCL m o LL. E O c a Q .& cu GAJ lowCL cu ... Er Q.. ncu cn m 0 06 f r L %n WE ch f4 � � c W.= 4-0 6E M L -T GJQ fu m c T rrn� ii ii �f fFf = 1l1 i . = i VI Oen, cu Lm w> cu cn 0 M 4-0 E (! 4 ra CL E mmcu Lft c KU M-0 CU M x a 4-0cl E c0" � �i� 0 � F M ilk Q) 3: mo m 4S, if F 0 O to r 0 0 En m A to > �7 —'r� Qj + ...r NT CL • — S u L � � X 5.. bo r0 Ln .. m C 4-J CL +0 • i L CO cL r , m V/// 1 o Li -o a." 3: .— .� w D r— -W bb to ed • CL, O +30 to C Ib t Ma) m :3b L4 q •- " s� C KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: August 23, 2021 TOPIC: Yakima River Access at South Thorp Highway ACTION REQUESTED: Direction to Staff LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Recently, staff learned of Yakima River fishing guide launch issues associated with the KOA campground. • Staff has evaluated the existing river access from our South Thorp Highway pit. • Staff has begun discussions with the Prosecuting Attorney's Office regarding the creation of a "permit" or "license" allowing access. BACKGROUND: Recent ownership transfer at the KOA campground appears to be causing access issues for local fishing guides. Public Works (PW) has evaluated a request to utilize an existing river access road at the west end of the South Thorp Highway bridge. Recently, the Board authorized placement of honeybees on Flood Control Zone District property prompting the creation of a "license" for site use. DISCUSSION: There are limited opportunities for accessing the Yakima River in lower Kittitas County. The existing access at PW's South Thorp Highway pit was recently evaluated by staff for potential safety improvements. Staff believes the access could be improved supporting two- way traffic for approximately $50,000. The permitting process is not fully understood at this time. Access to the improved roadway could be facilitated by issuance of a license to commercial fish guides. The site has river hazards, and it is expected that only seasoned guides could negotiate river current at the put-out location. Full scale public access is not encouraged by PW. FISCAL IMPACTS: Approximately $50,000 is needed to improve the existing access roadway to two-way traffic. There is sufficient turnaround area at the end of the road for an experienced boater to load a drift boat. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Site Map Page 1 of 2 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 EXHIBIT 1: SITE MAP Page 2 of 2 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 RalwRA FTI 7U RalwRA D CI �Mw� j■ 2 .,\ . .. .,� •� .� . � 7 i s�• � \� $ � � | � ., -- -� j ;2P�� , "rr, a mazy Z�� c %. _ . j_ J � �■ � / I � • � %x §� D CI �Mw� j■ 2 .,\ . .. .,� •� .� . � 7 i s�• � \� $ � � | � ., -- -� j KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: August 23, 2021 TOPIC: I-90 Exit 70 to Exit 85 Preliminary Design Phase 1 ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff work with regional Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) staff placing I-90 Exit 70 to Exit 85 Preliminary Design Phase 1 onto the state transportation improvement plan. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Placement of I-90 (Exit 70 — 85) preliminary design activities have not been getting any traction for placement onto the State Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP). • The state manager of the STIP believes the region will sponsor the project with some minimal level of funding. • PW suggests providing $100,000 in local money to WSDOT Southeast Region supporting initial preliminary design work in 2022. • PW could work with WSDOT Region staff ensuring the project is placed onto the 2022 STIP. • PW staff will also work placing the project onto QUADCO's regional plan. BACKGROUND: Recent legislative efforts targeting earmarking for transportation improvement projects all require any project to appear on WSDOT's STIP. Recent efforts securing earmarks failed in part owing to a lack of placement onto the STIP. DISCUSSION: PW staff specifically discussed the conundrum (no funding no STIP placement) with the manager of WSDOT's STIP. The solution appears to require the County fund preliminary engineering of Phase 1 supporting the project. The County can either carry the project on its Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or request the state to carry the project on the region's TIP. Staff is investigating the ability to provide the funding directly to the region allowing the region to manage the project. The County is specifically allowed to fund improvements to state highways at Revised Code of Washington (RCW) at Chapter 36.75.035. State and County cooperation is provided at Page 1 of 3 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 RCW 36.75.030. Cooperative agreements are detailed at RCW 47.28.140. All RCW sections cited are provided as EXHIBIT 1. FISCAL IMPACTS: It is presumed that $100,000 in preliminary engineering Phase 1 would be sufficient to get the project on the STIP. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Revised Code of Washington 36.75.030, 36.75.035 and 47.28.140. Page 2 of 3 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 EXHIBIT 1: REVISED CODE of WASHINGTON 36.75.030, 36.75.035 and 47.28.140. Page 3 of 3 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 i:THAPIIZIA Rcw 36.75.030 State and county cooperation. RCW 36.75.030: State and county cooperation. The state department of transportation and tree governing oniciais of any county may enter into reciprocal public highway improvement and maintenance agreements, providing for cooperation either in the county assisting the department in the improvement or maintenance of state highways, or the department assisting the county in the improvement or maintenance of county roads, under any circumstance where a necessity appears therefor or where economy in public highway improvement and maintenance will be best served. [ 1984 c 7 § 27; 1963 c 4 § 36.75.030. Prior: 1939 c 181 § 11; RRS § 6450-2a.] https:Rapp.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.75.030 ill 8!1612021 RCW 36.75.035: County may fund improvements to state highways. RCW 36.75.035 County may fund improvements to state highways. A county pursuant to chapter 36.88 RCW, or a service district as provided for in chapter 36.83 RCW, may, with the approval of the state department of transportation, improve or fund the improvement of any state highway within its boundaries. The county may fund improvements under this section by any means authorized by law, except that expenditures of county road funds under chapter 36.82 RCW under this section must be limited to improvements to the state highway system and shall not include maintenance or operations. Nothing in this section shall limit the authority of a county to fund cooperative improvement and maintenance agreements with the department of transportation, authorized by RCW 36.75.030 or 47.28.140. [2002c60§1;1986c400§1.] NOTES: County road improvement districts and service districts may improve state highways: RCW 36.83.010 and 36.88.010. httpsJlapp.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.75.035 111 8116/2021 RCW 47.28.140: Highway, public transportation improvements, flood damage prevention—Cooperative agreements. RCW 47.28.140 Highway, public transportation improvements, flood damage prevention— Cooperative agreements. When in the opinion of the governing authorities representing the department and any public agency, instrumentality, municipal corporation, or political subdivision of the state of Washington, any highway, road, street, or urban public transportation system will be benefited or improved by constructing, reconstructing, locating, relocating, laying out, repairing, surveying, altering, improving, or maintaining, or by the establishment adjacent to, under, upon, within, or above any portion of any such highway, road, street, or urban public transportation system, by either the department or any public agency, instrumentality, municipal corporation, or political subdivision of the state, and it is in the public interest to do so, the authorities may enter into cooperative agreements wherein either agrees to perform the work and furnish the materials necessary and pay the cost thereof, including necessary engineering assistance, which costs and expenses must be reimbursed by the party whose responsibility it was to do or perform the work or improvement in the first instance. The work may be done by either day labor or contract, and the cooperative agreement between the parties must provide for the method of reimbursement. In the case of some special benefit or improvement to a state highway derived from any project that assists in preventing or minimizing flood damages as defined in RCW 86.16.120 or from the construction of any public works project, including any urban public transportation system, the department may contribute to the cost thereof by making direct payment to the particular state department, agency, instrumentality, municipal corporation, or political subdivision on the basis of benefits received, but such payment may be made only after a cooperative agreement has been entered into for a specified amount or on an actual cost basis prior to the commencement of the particular public works project. [ 2013 c 113 § 7; 1991 c 322 § 29; 1984 c 7 § 174; 1967 c 108 § 6; 1961 c 13 § 47.28.140. Prior: 1965 c 384 § 8.] NOTES: Findings-4ntent 1991 c 322; See note following RCW 86.12.200. Urban public transportation system defined. RCW 47.04.082. https:Happ.leg.wa.gov/RCWldefault.aspx?cite=47.28.140 111 KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: August 23, 2021 TOPIC: Automated Traffic Safety Cameras ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Provide information to the Upper County Traffic Committee and begin assessing the potential for legislative action. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Automated traffic safety cameras are authorized in state law at Revised Code of Washington Chapter 46.63.170 (EXHIBIT 1). • The use of cameras for speed enforcement are currently restricted to use for communities west of the Cascade mountains (46.63.170.1c). This use is further restricted at 1 c(i) and (ii). BACKGROUND: Increasing urbanization is resulting in frequent speed violations on numerous county roads. Responding to growing frustration from County residents, Public Works has deployed numerous speed feedback signs along select County roads. Public Works is also deploying various "traffic calming devices" attempting to build a portfolio of actions for use Countywide. The toolbox of "traffic calming devices" is limited when deployed on rural county roads. Current state law does not allow deployment of speed cameras in rural eastern Washington. DISCUSSION: The work of the Upper County Traffic Committee affirms the need to widen Interstate 90 from Exit 70 to Exit 85 (Easton to Cle Elum). While the County is working diligently to determine federal and state appetite for the improvement, diverting 1-90 traffic continues creating congestion and speeding issues for local residents. Public Works is currently evaluating necessary state law changes enabling the County to deploy speed cameras along selected County roads. Current legislation precludes consideration of such deployment. Given the fact that I-90 widening (Exit 70 to Exit 85) will likely take ten years or more, the State Legislature may be willing to entertain a discussion about use of speed cameras as a tool bridging impacts ahead of I-90 widening. Page 1 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) of Washington provides the following summary at their website: "RCW 46.63.170 authorizes cities and counties in Washington State to use automated traffic safety cameras in limited situations. The cameras may only be used to detect stoplight violations (red light cameras), railroad crossing violations, and/or school zone speed violations." Data from MRSC's website is provided as EXHIBIT 2. As currently written, population thresholds appear to limit small rural counties access to the pilot program. There are also numerous significant hurdles County faces in amending RCW 46.63.170 allowing for speed camera use. The legislation focuses on intersection "red light" running far more than speeding. It might be time to solicit various stakeholders defining the appetite for State Legislative lobbying efforts. FISCAL IMPACTS: None identified at this time. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Revised Code of Washington 46.63.170 Exhibit 2: MRSC Website Information Page 2 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 EXHIBIT 1: REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON 46.63.170 Page 3 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 a113/2021 RCW 46.63.170: Automated traffic safety cameras—Definition. (<i>Effective until June 30, 2423.</i>) RCW 46.63.170 Automated traffic safety cameras—Definition. (Effective until June 30, 2023} (1) The use of automated traffic safety cameras for issuance of notices of infraction is subject to the following requirements: (a) Except for proposed locations used solely for the pilot program purposes permitted under subsection (6) of this section, the appropriate local legislative authority must prepare an analysis of the locations within the jurisdiction where automated traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located: (i) Before enacting an ordinance allowing for the initial use of automated traffic safety cameras; and (ii) before adding additional cameras or relocating any existing camera to a new location within the jurisdiction. Automated traffic safety cameras may be used to detect one or more of the following: Stoplight, railroad crossing, or school speed zone violations; speed violations subject to (c) of this subsection; or violations included in subsection (6) of this section for the duration of the pilot program authorized under subsection (6) of this section. At a minimum, the local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage. Cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras before July 24, 2005, are subject to the restrictions described in this section, but are not required to enact an authorizing ordinance. Beginning one year after June 7, 2012, cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera and any other relevant information about the automated traffic safety cameras that the city or county deems appropriate on the city's or county's web site. (b) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection and subsection (6) of this section, use of automated traffic safety cameras is restricted to the following locations only: (i) Intersections of two or more arterials with traffic control signals that have yellow change interval durations in accordance with RCW 47.36.022, which interval durations may not be reduced after placement of the camera; (ii) railroad crossings; and (iii) school speed zones. (c) Any city west of the Cascade mountains with a population of more than one hundred ninety- five thousand located in a county with a population of fewer than one million five hundred thousand may operate an automated traffic safety camera to detect speed violations subject to the following limitations: (i) A city may only operate one such automated traffic safety camera within its respective jurisdiction; and (ii) The use and location of the automated traffic safety camera must have first been authorized by the Washington state legislature as a pilot project for at least one full year. (d) Automated traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an infraction is occurring. The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or of passengers in the vehicle. The primary purpose of camera placement is to take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate when an infraction is occurring. Cities and counties shall consider installing cameras in a manner that minimizes the impact of camera flash on drivers. (e) A notice of infraction must be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen days of the violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within fourteen days of establishing the renter's name and address under subsection (3)(a) of this section. The law enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images produced by an automated traffic safety camera, stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction. This certificate or facsimile is prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and is admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under this chapter. The photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images evidencing the violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction. A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic safety camera may respond to the notice by mail. hfps://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.63.170 1/7 8/13/2021 RCW 46.63.170: Automated traffic safety cameras—Definition. (<i>Etfective until June 30, 2023.<>) (f) The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction under RCW 46.63.030(1)(d) unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption in RCW 46.63.076, or, in the case of a rental car business, satisfies the conditions under subsection (3) of this section. if appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under subsection (3)(a) of this section is responsible for an infraction. (g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images, or any other personally identifying data prepared under this section are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of duties under this section and are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this section. No photograph, microphotograph, or electronic image, or any other personally identifying data may be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations under this section nor retained longer than necessary to enforce this section. (h) All locations where an automated traffic safety camera is used must be clearly marked at least thirty days prior to activation of the camera by placing signs in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera. Signs placed in automated traffic safety camera locations after June 7, 2012, must follow the specifications and guidelines under the manual of uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways as adopted by the department of transportation under chapter 47.36 RCW. (1) If a county or city has established an authorized automated traffic safety camera program under this section, the compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the equipment used must be based only upon the value of the equipment and services provided or rendered in support of the system, and may not be based upon a portion of the fine or civil penalty imposed or the revenue generated by the equipment. (2) Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120. Additionally, infractions generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras under this section shall be processed in the same manner as parking infractions, including for the purposes of RCW 3.50.100, 35.20.220, 46.16A.120, and 46.20.270(2). Except as provided otherwise in subsection (6) of this section, the amount of the fine issued for an infraction generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the amount of a fine issued for other parking infractions within the jurisdiction. However, the amount of the fine issued for a traffic control signal violation detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the monetary penalty for a violation of RCW 46.61.054 as provided under RCW 46.63.190, including all applicable statutory assessments. (3) If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of infraction being issued under this section, provide a written notice to the rental car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car business if the rental car business does not, within eighteen days of receiving the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by return mail: (a) A statement under oath stating the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred; or (b) A statement under oath that the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction occurred because the vehicle was stolen at the time of the infraction. A statement provided under this subsection must be accompanied by a copy of a filed police report regarding the vehicle theft; or (c) In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty. Timely mailing of this statement to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the notice of infraction. (4) Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1) (a), (b), or (c). https://app.leg.wa.gov/rewldefault.aspx?cite=46.63.170 217 8/13!2021 RCW 46.63.170: Automated traffic safety cameras—Definitlon. (<i>Effective until June 30, 2023.</i>) (5)(a) For the purposes of this section, "automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a speed limit as detected by a speed measuring device. (b) For the purposes of the pilot program authorized under subsection (6) of this section, "automated traffic safety camera" also includes a device used to detect stopping at intersection or crosswalk violations; stopping when traffic obstructed violations; public transportation only lane violations; and stopping or traveling in restricted lane violations. The device, including all technology defined under "automated traffic safety camera," must not reveal the face of the driver or the passengers in vehicles, and must not use any facial recognition technology in real time or after capturing any information. If the face of any individual in a crosswalk or otherwise within the frame is incidentally captured, it may not be made available to the public nor used for any purpose including, but not limited to, any law enforcement action, except in a pending action or proceeding related to a violation under this section. (6)(a)(i) A city with a population greater than five hundred thousand may adopt an ordinance creating a pilot program authorizing automated traffic safety cameras to be used to detect one or more of the following violations: Stopping when traffic obstructed violations; stopping at intersection or crosswalk violations; public transportation only lane violations; and stopping or traveling in restricted lane violations. Under the pilot program, stopping at intersection or crosswalk violations may only be enforced at the twenty intersections where the city would most like to address safety concerns related to stopping at intersection or crosswalk violations. At a minimum, the local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage. (ii) Except where specifically exempted, all of the rules and restrictions applicable to the use of automated traffic safety cameras in this section apply to the use of automated traffic safety cameras in the pilot program established in this subsection (6). (iii) As used in this subsection (6), "public transportation vehicle" means any motor vehicle, streetcar, train, trolley vehicle, ferry boat, or any other device, vessel, or vehicle that is owned or operated by a transit authority or an entity providing service on behalf of a transit authority that is used for the purpose of carrying passengers and that operates on established routes. "Transit authority" has the meaning provided in RCW 9.91.025. (b) Use of automated traffic safety cameras as authorized in this subsection (6) is restricted to the following locations only: Locations authorized in subsection (1)(b) of this section; and midblock on arterials. Additionally, the use of automated traffic safety cameras as authorized in this subsection (6) is further limited to the following: (i) The portion of state and local roadways in downtown areas of the city used for office and commercial activities, as well as retail shopping and support services, and that may include mixed residential uses; (ii) The portion of state and local roadways in areas in the city within one-half mile north of the boundary of the area described in (b)(i) of this subsection; (iii) Portions of roadway systems in the city that travel into and out of (b)(ii) of this subsection that are designated by the Washington state department of transportation as noninterstate freeways for up to four miles; and (iv) Portions of roadway systems in the city connected to the portions of the noninterstate freeways identified in (b)(iii) of this subsection that are designated by the Washington state department of transportation as arterial roadways for up to one mile from the intersection of the arterial roadway and the noninterstate freeway. (c) However, automated traffic safety cameras may not be used on an on-ramp to an interstate. https:I/app.leg.wa.govircw/default.aspx?cite=46.63.170 317 8/13/2021 RCW 46.63.170: Automated traffic safety cameras --Definition. (<i> Effective until June 30, 2023.<11>) (d) From June 11, 2020, through December 31, 2020, a warning notice with no penalty must be issued to the registered owner of the vehicle for a violation generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera authorized in this subsection (6). Beginning January 1, 2021, a notice of infraction must be issued, in a manner consistent with subsections (1)(e) and (3) of this section, for a violation generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera authorized in this subsection (6). However, the penalty for the violation may not exceed seventy-five dollars. (e) For infractions issued as authorized in this subsection (6), a city with a pilot program shall remit monthly to the state fifty percent of the noninterest money received under this subsection (6) in excess of the cost to install, operate, and maintain the automated traffic safety cameras for use in the pilot program. Money remitted under this subsection to the state treasurer shall be deposited in the Cooper Jones active transportation safety account created in RCW 46.68.480. The remaining fifty percent retained by the city must be used only for improvements to transportation that support equitable access and mobility for persons with disabilities. (f) A transit authority may not take disciplinary action, regarding a warning or infraction issued pursuant to this subsection (6), against an employee who was operating a public transportation vehicle at the time the violation that was the basis of the warning or infraction was detected. (g) A city that implements a pilot program under this subsection (6) must provide a preliminary report to the transportation committees of the legislature by June 30, 2022, and a final report by January 1, 2023, on the pilot program that includes the locations chosen for the automated traffic safety cameras used in the pilot program, the number of warnings and traffic infractions issued under the pilot program, the number of traffic infractions issued with respect to vehicles registered outside of the county in which the city is located, the infrastructure improvements made using the penalty moneys as required under (e) of this subsection, an equity analysis that includes any disproportionate impacts, safety, and on-time performance statistics related to the impact on driver behavior of the use of automated traffic safety cameras in the pilot program, and any recommendations on the use of automated traffic safety cameras to enforce the violations that these cameras were authorized to detect under the pilot program. [ 2020 c 224 § 1; 2016 3rd sp.s. c 44 § 406; 2015 1st sp.s. c 10 § 702; 2013 c 306 § 711. Prior: 2012 c 86 § 3; 2012 c 83 § 7; 2011 c 367 § 704; 2010 c 161 § 1127; 2009 c 470 § 714; 2007 c 372 § 3; 2005 c 167 § 1.] NOTES: § 3.] Expiration date -2020 c 224 § 1: "Section 1 of this act expires June 30, 2023." [ 2020 c 224 Effective date -2016 3rd sp.s. c 44: See note following RCW 46.68.396. Effective date -20151st sp.s. c 10: See note following RCW 43.19.642. Effective date ---2013 c 306: See note following RCW 47.64.170. Findings—Intent-2012 c 86: 'The legislature finds that it is in the interests of the driving public to continue to provide for a uniform system of traffic control signals, including provisions relative to yellow light durations, fine amounts for certain traffic control signal violations, and signage and reporting requirements at certain traffic control signal locations. The legislature further finds that a uniform system of traffic control signals greatly enhances the public's confidence in a safe and equitable highway network. Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to harmonize and make uniform certain legal provisions relating to traffic control signals." [ 2012 c 86 § 1.] httpe./lapp.leg.wa.govlrcvddefault.aspx?cite=46.63.170 47 811312021 RCW 46.63.170: Automated traffic safety cameras—Definition. (<i>Effective until June 30, 2023.</i>) Effective date -2011 c 367 §§ 703, 704, 716, and 719: See note following RCW 46.18.060. Effective date—Intent—Legislation to reconcile chapter 161, Laws of 2010 and other amendments made during the 2010 legislative session -2010 c 161: See notes following RCW 46.04.013. Effective date -2009 c 470: See note following RCW 46.68.170. RCW 46.63.170 Automated traffic safety cameras—Definition. (Effective June 30, 2023.) (1) The use of automated traffic safety cameras for issuance of notices of infraction is subject to the following requirements: (a) The appropriate local legislative authority must prepare an analysis of the locations within the jurisdiction where automated traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located: (i) Before enacting an ordinance allowing for the initial use of automated traffic safety cameras; and (ii) before adding additional cameras or relocating any existing camera to a new location within the jurisdiction. Automated traffic safety cameras may be used to detect one or more of the following: Stoplight, railroad crossing, or school speed zone violations; or speed violations subject to (c) of this subsection. At a minimum, the local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage. Cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras before July 24, 2005, are subject to the restrictions described in this section, but are not required to enact an authorizing ordinance. Beginning one year after June 7, 2012, cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera and any other relevant information about the automated traffic safety cameras that the city or county deems appropriate on the city's or county's web site, (b) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, use of automated traffic safety cameras is restricted to the following locations only: (i) Intersections of two arterials with traffic control signals that have yellow change interval durations in accordance with RCW 47.36.022, which interval durations may not be reduced after placement of the camera; (ii) railroad crossings; and (iii) school speed zones. (c) Any city west of the Cascade mountains with a population of more than one hundred ninety- five thousand located in a county with a population of fewer than one million five hundred thousand may operate an automated traffic safety camera to detect speed violations subject to the following limitations: (i) A city may only operate one such automated traffic safety camera within its respective jurisdiction; and (ii) The use and location of the automated traffic safety camera must have first been authorized by the Washington state legislature as a pilot project for at least one full year. (d) Automated traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an infraction is occurring. The picture must not reveal the face of the driver or of passengers in the vehicle. The primary purpose of camera placement is to take pictures of the vehicle and vehicle license plate when an infraction is occurring. Cities and counties shall consider installing cameras in a manner that minimizes the impact of camera flash on drivers. (e) A notice of infraction must be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen days of the violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within fourteen days of establishing the renter's name and address under subsection (3)(a) of this section. The law enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images produced by an automated traffic safety camera, stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction. This certificate or facsimile is prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and is admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under this chapter. The photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images evidencing the violation must be available for https:llapp.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.63.170 $r/ 8/13/2021 RCW 46.63.170: Automated traffic safety cameras—Definition. (ai>Effectirre until June 30, 2023,<>) inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction. A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic safety camera may respond to the notice by mail. (f) The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction under RCW 46.63.030(1)(d) unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption in RCW 46.63.076, or, in the case of a rental car business, satisfies the conditions under subsection (3) of this section. If appropriate under the circumstances, a renter Identified under subsection (3)(a) of this section is responsible for an infraction. (g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images prepared under this section are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of duties under this section and are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this section. No photograph, microphotograph, or electronic image may be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations under this section nor retained longer than necessary to enforce this section. (h) All locations where an automated traffic safety camera is used must be clearly marked at least thirty days prior to activation of the camera by placing signs in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera. Signs placed in automated traffic safety camera locations after June 7, 2012, must follow the specifications and guidelines under the manual of uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways as adopted by the department of transportation under chapter 47.36 RCW. (i) If a county or city has established an authorized automated traffic safety camera program under this section, the compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the equipment used must be based only upon the value of the equipment and services provided or rendered in support of the system, and may not be based upon a portion of the fine or civil penalty imposed or the revenue generated by the equipment. (2) Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.62.120. Additionally, infractions generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras under this section shall be processed in the same manner as parking infractions, including for the purposes of RCW 3.50.100, 36.20.220, 46.16A.120, and 46.20.270(2). The amount of the fine issued for an infraction generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the amount of a fine issued for other parking infractions within the jurisdiction. However, the amount of the fine issued for a traffic control signal violation detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the monetary penalty for a violation of RCW 46.61.060 as provided under RCW 46.63.110, including all applicable statutory assessments. (3) If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of infraction being issued under this section, provide a written notice to the rental car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car business if the rental car business does not, within eighteen days of receiving the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by return mail: (a) A statement under oath stating the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred; or (b) A statement under oath that the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the infraction occurred because the vehicle was stolen at the time of the infraction. A statement provided under this subsection must be accompanied by a copy of a filed police report regarding the vehicle theft; or (c) In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty. Timely mailing of this statement to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the notice of infraction. (4) Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1) (a), https:/Iapp.leg.wa.govircwldefault.aspx?cite=46.63.170 617 8/13/2021 RCW 46.63.170: Automated traffic safety cameras—De inition. (<i>Effective until June 30, 2023.<!i>) (b), or (c). (5) For the purposes of this section, "automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a speed limit as detected by a speed measuring device. (6) During the 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 fiscal biennia, this section does not apply to automated traffic safety cameras for the purposes of section 216(5), chapter 367, Laws of 2011 and section 216(6), chapter 306, Laws of 2013. [ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 44 § 406; 2015 1st sp.s. c 10 § 702; 2013 c 306 § 711. Prior: 2012 c 86 § 3; 2012 c 83 § 7; 2011 c 367 § 704; 2010 c 161 § 1127; 2009 c 470 § 714; 2007 c 372 § 3; 2005 c 167 § 1.] NOTES: Effective date -2016 3rd sp.s. c 44: See note following RCW 46.68.395. Effective date -2015 1st sp.s. c 10: See note following RCW 43.19.642. Effective date -2013 c 306: See note following RCW 47.64.170. Findings—Intent-2012 c 86: 'The legislature finds that it is in the interests of the driving public to continue to provide for a uniform system of traffic control signals, including provisions relative to yellow light durations, fine amounts for certain traffic control signal violations, and signage and reporting requirements at certain traffic control signal locations. The legislature further finds that a uniform system of traffic control signals greatly enhances the public's confidence in a safe and equitable highway network. Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to harmonize and make uniform certain legal provisions relating to traffic control signals." [ 2012 c 86 § 11.] Effective date -2011 c 367 §§ 703, 704, 716, and 719: See note following RCW 46.18.060 - Effective date—Cntent—Legislation to reconcile chapter 161, Laws of 2010 and other amendments made during the 2010 legislative session -2010 c 161: See notes following RCW 46.04.013. Effective date -2009 c 470: See note following RCW 46.68.170. https:llapp.leg.wa.govlrcwldefault.aspx?cite=46.63.170 717 EXHIBIT 2: MRSC WEBSITE INFORMATION Page 4 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 MRSC Local GOWMMIA Success Automated Traffic Safety Cameras This page provides information about the use of automated traffic safety cameras (red light cameras and speed cameras) for local governments in Washington State, including statutory requirements, court decisions, examples, and recommended resources. Overview RQN 46.63.17Q authorizes cities and counties in Washington State to use automated traffic safety cameras in limited situations. The cameras may only be used to detect stoplight violations (red light cameras), railroad crossing violations, and/or school zone speed violations. The cameras may only be placed in the following locations: • Intersections of two or more arterials with traffic control signals that have yellow change interval durations in accordance with RCW 47.36.022whose intervals may not be reduced after placement of the camera; • Railroad crossings; and • School speed zones. (The legislature has also periodically authorized additional, and very limited, pilot projects in specific jurisdictions.) The cameras may only take pictures of the vehicle and the vehicle's license plate and only while the infraction is occurring; the photos must not reveal the face of the driver or passengers, and cities and counties must consider installing the cameras in a manner that minimizes the impact of the camera flash on drivers. Automated traffic infractions are processed in the same manner as parking infractions. The statute lays out additional procedural requirements, including signage, public records considerations, and notices of infractions. The compensation paid to the camera vendor or manufacturer must be based on the value of the equipment and services provided or rendered in support of the system and may not be based on the fines, penalties, or revenues, generated by the equipment. Analysis and Reporting Requirements The local legislative body must prepare an analysis of the locations where the automated cameras are proposed prior to enacting the initial ordinance. Once the initial cameras are installed, the jurisdiction must conduct an additional analysis before adding any new cameras or relocating existing cameras. All camera locations must be clearly marked at least 30 days before the camera is activated. Some jurisdictions have also imposed temporary grace periods after the cameras are activated to educate drivers without ticketing them. Cities and counties using automated cameras must post an annual report on their websites showing: • The number of traffic accidents that occurred at each camera location; • The number of notices of infraction issued for each camera; and • Any other relevant information that the city or county deems appropriate. Records Management Photographs, electronic images, or any other personally identifying data from automated traffic safety cameras are for the exclusive use of law enforcement and are prohibited from release to the public under RCW 46.63.170(1)(g). For information on the retention of automated traffic safety camera footage, see our page Retention Requirements for Law Enforcement Records. Court Decisions Below are selected court decisions pertaining to automated traffic safety cameras, and specifically whether or not the use or authorization of such cameras is subject to initiative or referendum. • City of Longview v. Walling 174 Wn. App. 763 (4130/2013) — Longview adopted an ordinance providing for the placement of automated traffic safety cameras. An initiative was filed to reverse the action. Ultimately the initiative process was stopped after the Supreme Court concluded in Mukilteo Citizens for Simple Govemment v. Cityof Mukilteo, 174 Wn.2d 41 (2012) that the decision to provide for such cameras was not subject to initiative. Wallin appealed, arguing a variety of issues, including challenges to the city's standing, ripeness, Freedom of Speech, etc. The court, on appeal, denied Wallin's efforts, affirming the lower court's decision. • Eyman v. McGehee, 173 Wn. App. 684 (211912013) — After the City of Redmond provided for automatic traffic safety cameras, an initiative was filed with the city clerk seeking an initiative on such cameras. Since the supreme court had determined that initiatives on such issues was beyond the scope of the initiative power, the city clerk did not file the initiative petitions with the county auditor. The initiative proponents sued, seeking to require the clerk to transmit the petitions to the county. The court denied issuance of a writ of mandamus and the initiative proponents appealed. On appeal, the court affirmed. A city clerk has a mandatory duty under the statutes governing the filing of initiative petitions to transmit such petitions to the county auditor for determination of sufficiency. But, a court may review the substance of an initiative petition to determine whether it is valid. Such a determination is "exclusively a judicial function.' Despite a city clerk's mandatory duty, however, a court may decline to grant a writ of mandamus if it determines that ordering compliance is a useless act because an initiative is invalid. • Mukilteo Citizens Am Simple Gov't v. Cityfo MAMtro,174 Wn.2d 41(0310812012) —Because the legislature expressly granted authority to the governing body of the city of Mukilteo to enact ordinances on the use of automated traffic safety cameras, the subject matter of Proposition 1 is not within the initiative power • American Traffic Solutions v. City of Bellingham,163 Wn. App 427 (09/06/2011) — Initiative No. 2011-01 exceeds the lawful scope of local initiative power; it is not a valid ballot measure Examples of Local Traffic Safety Camera Programs Below are a few selected examples of local government automated traffic safety camera programs in Washington State, including code provisions, reports, FAQs, informational materials, and RFPs. This is not intended to be a complete list of all jurisdictions that use automated traffic safety cameras. Just because a jurisdiction has authorized the use of automated safety cameras in certain situations (red lights, school zones, or railroad crossings) does not mean it is currently using cameras in all of those situations. Ordinances/Code Provisions • Bellevue Munk pat Code Ch.11.49 — Red lights and school zones • Federal Way Municipal Code Sec. 8.05.090 — Red lights and school zones • IsMuah Municipal Code Ch.10.42 — Red lights and school zones • Lake Forest Park Municipal Code Ch. 10.06 — Red lights and school zones • Lakewood Municipat Code Sec.1 .04.040 — Red lights, railroad crossings, and school zones • Lynnwood Municipal Code Ch. 11.18 — Red lights, railroad crossings, and school zones • Moses Lake Municipal Code Ch. 10.48 — Red lights, railroad crossings, and school zones • Pierce County. Code Ch. 10.42 — Red lights only • Spokane Municipal Code Ch. 16A.64 — Red lights and school zones. Includes sunset date; city has been using 5 - year reauthorizations. • Tukwila Ordinance No 2612 (2019) — School zones only; includes analysis of proposed intersections, implementation timeline, FAQs, and information materials distributed to school district staff, students, and parents • Wenatchee Municipal Code Ch 8.06 — Red lights and school zones Websites/Annual Reports • Fife Safety Carrera Enforcement— Includes reasons for installation, annual reports, FAQs, and information on how revenues will be spent • lsquah Cam raNhoto Enforcement — Annual report and information on how to respond to a citation • Lake Forest Park Photo Enforcement Program — FAQs and annual reports • Kent School Zone and Red Light Photo Enforcement FAQs • Moses Lake Redf lex Camera Tic — Includes FAQs and annual report • Renton Photo Enforcement FAQs • Seattle: • Red Light Cameras • School Zone Speed Cameras • Spokane Photo Red — Includes FAQs, annual reports, and videos • Wenatchee Automated Traffic Safety Program — FAQs and annual report Requests for Proposals • Fife School Zone Speed Cameras RFP (2019) Recommended Resources Below are some useful resources that provide additional information about automated traffic cameras. • U.S. Federal Highway Administration: Red -Light Running — Series of pages on intersection safety, including data, research, and case studies Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE): o A Before -and -After Study on Red -Light Camera Installation, ITEJoumal, March 2003, Institute of Transportation Engineers. Used by permission. o The Impact of Red -Light Camera Enforcement an Crash Ex rpe ience, ITEJoumal, March 2003, Institute of Transportation Engineers. Used by permission. "Issues Related to Red -Light Camera Enforcement System;' ITEJoumal, July 2008 - available through MRSC Library Loan e Insurance Institute for Hig way Safety: Red Light Running — Information about red light cameras, including how to maintain public support National Conference of State Legislatures: Automated Enforcement v rvi w — Information about traffic safety trends and state legislation • Texas Transportation Institute: Speed Cameras: An Effectiveness and a Policy Review, by David K. Willis (2006) — Concludes that speeding enhances crash risk and severity and that speed cameras reduce both speeding and crash severity. Implementation issues, however, are highly problematic, and a poorly implemented automated speed enforcement program can easily undermine public support. Last Modified: April 02, 2021 Follow us: ® 2021 Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington (MRSC). Al1, rights reserved. Privacy Term KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: August 23, 2021 TOPIC: City of Ellensburg Connector Roads ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff on the suitability of interlocal agreement adoption concerning connector roads. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Kittitas County and the City of Ellensburg are contemplating an interlocal agreement for Urban Growth Area (UGA) management. • The City's connector road proposal will impact County residents (EXHIBIT 1). • Staff has taken the "cartoon" from the city and forecast impacts on County resident parcels. BACKGROUND: Recent discussions with City of Ellensburg staff verify the adoption of the City's connector road proposal contained in their transportation element of their comprehensive plan — will be required with adoption of an interlocal (ILA) for UGA management. Staff has prepared exhibits resolving the City's "cartoons" (rough layout of proposed roads) to actual County tax parcels (EXHIBIT 2). Staff has highlighted the larger parcels for Board consideration (EXHIBIT 3). DISCUSSION: Adopting an interlocal agreement with the City for UGA management will require adoption of the City's "connector roads" proposal. The proposal calls for the extension of exiting City streets into the UGA. Knowing the probable impacts on development lands in the UGA, staff has prepared maps depicting impacts on County UGA parcels. Adoption of the "connector roads" proposal is one of several land use actions impacted by ILA adoption. FISCAL IMPACTS: Undetermined at this time. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: City of Ellensburg "Connector Roads" Exhibit 2: County maps Exhibit 3: UGA Parcels impacted Page 1 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 EXHIBIT 1: CITY OF ELLENSBURG CONNECTOR ROADS Page 2 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 1 I I i R`•`� y.,.r�,7 �a..,,x � t F F _ • r 4 z 9 I e i E I!F Y 1 ° I x - A _ NY. senll--?- .� _�y.;, Sy 30y N' L' C _ tti . f. 3FJT z '!{'L '4 Y I I - 7 i 1• � ...✓. Y+ J � W � J pJo a�a J 1 I I i Y Y 1 1 a Pl - _ F F _ • � I - i tti . f. ...✓. Y+ J � W � J pJo a�a J z z w m H pz Qz F I I V V I i EXHIBIT 2: COUNTY MAPS Page 3 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 30 'i Road Classification Classification \ EKSTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL f EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR DUSTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FU'T1;RE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR iNTER.STATE Cities El SBI RG Zoning Overlays Urban GroKd,:h Area CID 16 16 4 5 TELLENSBURG —1 34 i CIQ 9 1.0 i� I 3$ !� i 4 N 00.2505 'i Miles City of Ellensburg Proposed Future Connections NUMBER CLASSIFICATION DESRIPT10N 1 Future Minor Collector W University Way to Hwy 97 2 Future Minor Collector W Dolarway to W University Way 3 Future Major Collector Reecer Creek Rd to Dry Creek Rd 4 Future Minor Arterial W Helena St to Dry Creek Rd 5 Future Minor Arterial W Helena St to Dry Creek Rd 6 Future Minor Collector N Cora St to W Helena St 7 Future Minor Collector W Helena St to W Bender Rd 8 Future Minor Collector W Bender Rd to W Bowers Rd 9 Future Minor Collector Bull Rd to Future Connections 10, 11, 12 10 Future Minor Collector Bull Rd to Future Connections 10, 11, 12 11 Future Minor Collector Bull Rd to Future Connections 10, 11, 12 12 Future Minor Collector Bull Rd to Future Connections 10, 11, 12 13 Future Minor Collector N Willow to N Brook Ln 14 Future Minor Collector E 18th Ave to E Helena 15 Future Minor Collector W Greenfield St to Future Connection 7 16 Future Minor Collector Future Connection 15 to Future Connection 7 17 Future Minor Collector E Greenfield St to N Airport Rd 18 Future Minor Collector N Airport to N Alder 19 Future Minor Collector E Bender Rd to Look Rd 20 Future Minor Collector E Sanders Rd to E Greenfield St 21 Future Minor Collector Future Connector 20 to E Helena St 22 Future Minor Collector Look Rd to Future Connector 40 23 Future Minor Collector N of Future Connectors 22 and 40 to Future Connector 24 24 Future Minor Collector Game Farm Rd to Future Connectors 20, 22, and 40 intersections 25 Future Minor Collector Vantage Hwy to Judge Ronald Rd 26 Future Minor Collector Judge Ronald Rd 27 Future Minor Collector Judge Ronald Rd 28 Future Minor Collector Judge Ronald Rd to Game Farm Rd 29 Future Minor Arterial E Bowers Rd to Look Rd 30 Future Minor Arterial Bowers Rd extension past Roan Rd 31 Future Minor Arterial Bender Rd to Bowers Rd 32 Future Minor Arterial N Alder St to E Bowers Rd 33 Future Minor Arterial E Helena to Brick Rd 34 Future Major Collector E Umptanum Rd extension East 35 Future Minor Arterial Capitol Ave to Pfenning 36 Future Minor Collector Extension of Bowers east of Look Rd 37 Future Minor Collector Greenfield Rd connection between developments 38 Future Minor Collector Canyon Rd to Berry Rd 39 Future Minor Collector Extension of Greenfield Ave east 40 Future Minor Collector East extension from Future Connector#22 (East off of Look Rd) Legend ELLENSBURG Urban Growth Area [� Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAIOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR - EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAIOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR 7uT -O CTATF i 559333 1 t 1 1679333 E�0478 M.8-470, aHwy1. W University Way to 97 N \\\ 93;736 `657366 ELLENSBURG i i 7 3,�. 95'2b? r 9.3293Aq 9,3294a �o V63290 953293 "59? 3 3 F I r-604 4llb��•3��: 0.05 0.1 0.2 Wheel Parcel impact information: Parcel Owner Address Land Use 66236 PAUTZKE BAIT CO INC 1600 CURRIER ST Trade - Eating & Drinking 56236 ARNES, DIANE CURRIER ST Undeveloped - Land 236 PARK, YONG S CURRIER ST Undeveloped - Land P46 236 PAUTZKE BAIT CO INC CURRIER ST Undeveloped - Land 6603 JONES, GARY DALE REECER AVE Resource - Ag. Current Use 86133 PAUTZKE BAIT CO INC HWY 97 Undeveloped - Land 65736 PAUTZKE BAIT CO INC CURRIER ST Undeveloped - Land 17337 JSKS INC HWY 97 Undeveloped - Land 29333 TRIPLE L LLC HWY 97 Undeveloped - Land COUNTY 65736 PAUTZKE BAIT CO INC CURRIER ST Undeveloped - Land 17337 JSKS INC HWY 97 Undeveloped - Land Legend 2. W Dolarway to W ELLENSBURG,= `y;F : �:}� University Way c� / Urban Growth Area / � , ,�� /i ,- , Q Tax Parcels Only CIaS51fiCatlOrl 4r rr /, r ,/, , ' , - .•, i'• /- "/✓� , ELLENSBURG EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR ;,: ✓ / EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAIOR COLLFLTOR • • FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL. FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR y INTERSTATE �!.'' !/: `.;//.'//////. f ✓ /y / /; / ♦ / / /� '� // / 741/./ ,' ,' , /' // ✓ : > / /�!' y / Z Zw /' /'..�/,�;. /'.I; r .�`/ �,,;//' -� :%' 'fly j ,,, �, .•%;, l� /// ,i ,` ' ✓ ' f ri/ / 228233 /iT!i ✓ �� r'/ / ,- 445036 /� ✓ / / ;:' /,'% X, ,f / // / 0.07 0.15 0.31 653236 Parcel Impact Information: rarcell uwner Aaaress Lana use 626133 WEEKS, ISABELLE B 1315 W DOLARWAY RD Residential - Single Family 846133 CITY OF ELLENSBURG W DOLARWAY RD Services - Governmental 096133 CITY OF ELLENSBURG W DOLARWAY RD Services - Governmental 836133 CITY OF ELLENSBURG 1108 N POTT RD Services - Governmental 816133 CITY OF ELLENSBURG N POTT RD Services - Governmental 16605 JONES, GARY DALE N POTT RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 16606 JONES, GARY DALE N POTT RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 16607 JONES, GARY DALE N POTT RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 957141 CITY OF ELLENSBURG N POTT RD Services - Governmental 786133 ANDERSON, RONALD 1501 N POTT RD Residential - Single Family 295736 BARTON, JEROLD W DOLARWAY RD Undeveloped - Land 626133 WEEKS, ISABELLE B 1315 W DOLARWAY RD Residential - Single Family 295736 BARTON, JEROLD W DOLARWAY RD Undeveloped - Land Legend ELLENSBURG ® Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR - - FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR TNTCRCTETF 621033 M 961599 3. Reecer Creek Rd to Dry Creek Rd 891033 �.I 901033 60911 q 609 q bq 501033 R b0 Oq 6� b1 4 q q 609 bb �q0 9 60609 b� q 961604 Parcel Impact Information: , r; rarcel owner Aeares5 Land use 551033 BERG, CHARLES & STACY 2214 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 12345 POGUE, DANIEL R 2135 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 12346 HUNTER, ROBERT 2125 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 14909 JOHNSON, BRIAN 2129 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 14910 ODONNELL, ROSALYN C 2131 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 20232 DAGA DEV LLC REECER CREEK RD Fir , STERKEL, SHIRLEEN 2073 REECER CREEK RD rr 961598 SSHI LLC 2813 DAPPLE GRAY WY Undeveloped - Land 961600 CLE ELUM PINES W LLC DAPPLE GRAY WY Undeveloped - Land 961597 SSHI LLC 2815 DAPPLE GRAY WY Parcel Impact Information: , r; rarcel owner Aeares5 Land use 551033 BERG, CHARLES & STACY 2214 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 12345 POGUE, DANIEL R 2135 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 12346 HUNTER, ROBERT 2125 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 14909 JOHNSON, BRIAN 2129 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 14910 ODONNELL, ROSALYN C 2131 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 20232 DAGA DEV LLC REECER CREEK RD Resource - Agriculture 20233 STERKEL, SHIRLEEN 2073 REECER CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 961598 SSHI LLC 2813 DAPPLE GRAY WY Undeveloped - Land 961600 CLE ELUM PINES W LLC DAPPLE GRAY WY Undeveloped - Land 961597 SSHI LLC 2815 DAPPLE GRAY WY Undeveloped - Land 961596 SSRI LLC 2817 DAPPLE GRAY WY Undeveloped - Land Legend ELLENSBURG ® Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAIOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MA30R COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR TNTFRCTATF 85,1333 821133 133,, 4. Dry Creek Rd to Future 841133 831133 1133 Connector #5 (W Helena N St) 1851133 861133 ; 5. Future Connector #4 to 871133 031133 W Helena St. �• r- -:- :- ., . 881133 i 891133 - 6. Future Connector #4 �� and #5 intersection to N 171133 i 161133 l1191133- a 181133 ! ? l- ; l 221133 M 1 ���{'.-r�,cr�lry�rr� � r- .�, 221133 4�+ ____�222ooQ�^� rl /201133 cis "� r; r^ ~ nI FT `` 251 133 t,6 i 133 07': 134- ' 0211133 126133 -361'..1 J � n 566.+ u3 �r r I 8628.33 8428 -1 N 41 3331- -1- j t?3283 � � -- • - -- - -- I I 53. 3 85.333 i _ Parcell Impact Information: 0.05 Parcel Owner Address Land Use 932236 (4) MAISTEREK, NICHOLAS 1607 W DRY CREEK RD Residential - Single Family 851033 (4) DRY CREEK ACRES LLC REECER CREEK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 14602 (4) DRY CREEK ACRES LLC REECER CREEK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 14601 (4) ARROYO, RAMIRO REECER CREEK RD Undeveloped - Land 251133 (5) HIGASHIYAMA, DARREN M 503 W HELENA AVE Residential - Single Family 021133 (5) HIGDON, KEVIN B ETUX W HELENA AVE Resource - Ag. Current Use 851033 (5) DRY CREEK ACRES LLC REECER CREEK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 851033 (6) DRY CREEK ACRES LLC REECER CREEK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 862833 (6) ELLENSBURG SCHOOL Services - Educational 11711 (6) ELLENSBURG SCHOOL 2100 N CORA ST Services - Educational Legend ELLENSBURG Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR �^ INTERSTATE 7. W Helena Future 186233 Connection to W Bender " 18136 Rd S. W Bender Rd to W 176233 186233 Bowers Rd 046233Lco"&, /� /`v 0 18132 j (y) / / jELLENSBURGII, Av v ' 10 M ,f X�� 0.050.1 0.2 m Parcel Impact Information: / Parcei owner Address Lana use 51033 (7) DRY CREEK ACRES LLC REECER CREEK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 61033 (7) WOODS, JOHN N 1206 W BENDER RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 21033 (8) CAMPBELL, BRADLEY S RASMUSSEN RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 61033 (8) WOODS, JOHN N 1011 W BENDER RD Resource - Ag, Current Use 20936 (8) CAMPBELL, BRADLEY S 1090 W BOWERS RD Resource - Ag. Current Use Legend ELLENSBURG I ® Urban Growth Area 0 Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR �• EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR INTERSTATE .� 9. Intersection of Future Connectors #11 and #12 to Bull Rd -- — 'or' 1 0 -- 10. Bull Rd Continuation east `07 ; -- 11. Canyon Rd to intersection of ' Future Connectors #9 and #12 36 948633 f 628633 12. E U m pta n u m Rd to — --" - intersection of Future Connectors #9 and #11 I 17154 171531 171,63 17155 r a i I 2187331��`• 17156 `� 7, r,Q�3" � M CCc A 178733 183733 j ti 668733 Parcel Impact Information: 17FLr i 17826 s g9 ' 97 258936 Parcel Owner Aactress Lana Use 08633 (9) FENCELIKE LLC S CANYON RD Resource - Agriculture 59036 (9) FENCELIKE LLC 1611 BULL RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 17826 (10) SCHULER DENEEN RANCH BULL RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 17825 (10) SCHULER DENEEN RANCH BULL RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 82233 (ID) QUARTER CIRCLE FC LLC NO 6 RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 10436 (11) FENCELINE LLC 1700 S CANYON RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 38633 (11) FENCELINE LLC UMPTANUM E RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 59036 (11) FENCELIKE LLC 1611 BULL RD Resource - Ag, Current Use 59036 (12) FENCELIKE LLC 1611 BULL RD Resource - Ag. Current Use Legend- � ` ��13, N. Willow to Brook Lane ELLENSBURG 285233 18545 ;fj 04 1V_. 14. 18th Ave to E Helena St. I Urban Growth Area �_ I Y . ax arse Only 7 Classification 03 054F034 EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR 164034 EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL �:,: i EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR I �' r 374034 J )44034 EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL I `' FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR 034 FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL r _- 1 - __ / 513,634 j FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR INTERSTATE _12 6:4403 i I T 7 i f Cc 164734; � i 4834 -- —1—� --. 61C9ig 833936— J < 22936 i 23101 07 li I ' L� c" � LID`14936 �N 47483A.__! 1 4834 ! N Ijs 313534 143534 i 344034 123;34' 334034� + 34$133 l �� L6,:;ii2G! [hFrl TLI, I C''41 3n -� -.1905233 ++ I Parcel Impact Information: 1r .91013 f 444734 474134 rl i 744134 —�� ' j -----.r s� Parcel Owner Address Land Use 374034 (14) WA ST 18th St. Services - Governmental (CWU) Legend ELLENSBURG Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR INTERSTATE F,T ap 031133 891133 161133 IPj1>Kki 1133 i 133 721 -----133 ------ - T 209 15, W Greenfield to - - - - Delphine St 16. Delphine St. to Future Connector #7 TI 446936 -- 2C108: # i20107i is 1133 ` ` 20106 ;20, 05 rr�� ,r f LLQ i C�4 . 3. 2020 i�2 C-4 _-1 -1-1. 1_�_ ELLENSSi1RG.. ._- 231133 10332 `✓ 021133 Ilii f-1� 07i-133 t 251133 ' "b - 3 ii1 i 1 Parcel Impact Information: .r: ,I ,::::III LCTI C1 i -a —.� T1 - F -- 0.030.07 •,0.030.07 0.13 Mile Parcel %0 Address �11) -'i ,Y, .-1 fir; r+. �� t+; � c•; C t+} Ln I 01 € 0"',I `n '' C;/ ti 446936 (16) 4t; E BENDER RD t'i tin F C MCGEHEE, CHARLES 2406 N LILAC WAY f 201133 i 20793 (16) MOORE, ERNEST 2407 N DELPHINE ST Residential - Single Family 950799 (16) THOMPSON, JAY 2409 N LILAC WAY Residential - Single Family 161133 (16) MCKENZIE, DONALD 2410 HANNAH RD y, 951667 124113 .3 ! HANSBERRY, DONALD J r Residential - Single Family 861033 (16) 231133 10332 `✓ 021133 Ilii f-1� 07i-133 t 251133 ' "b - 3 ii1 i 1 Parcel Impact Information: .r: ,I ,::::III LCTI C1 i -a —.� T1 - F -- 0.030.07 •,0.030.07 0.13 Mile Parcel owner Address (Land Use 771133 (15) KITTITAS E BENDER RD Services - Governmental CO HOUSING 446936 (16) BDN PROPERTIES LLC E BENDER RD Undeveloped - Land 20792 (16) MCGEHEE, CHARLES 2406 N LILAC WAY Residential - Single Family 20793 (16) MOORE, ERNEST 2407 N DELPHINE ST Residential - Single Family 950799 (16) THOMPSON, JAY 2409 N LILAC WAY Residential - Single Family 161133 (16) MCKENZIE, DONALD 2410 HANNAH RD Residential - Single f=amily 171133 (16) HANSBERRY, DONALD J 2407 HANNAH RD Residential - Single Family 861033 (16) WOODS, JOHN N 1206 W BENDER RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 950799 (16) THOMPSON, JAY E 2409 N LILAC WAY Residential - Single Family 161133 (16) MCKENZIE, DONALD L 2410 HANNAH RD Residential - Single Family Legend ELLENSBURG ® Urban Gmwth Area Q Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR —� EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR --- EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR �� TIUTFgCT6TF r 17. N Alder to N Airport Rd 18. N Airport to E Greenfield Ave Parcel Impact Information: J Parcel uwner Aaaress Land use 552733 (17) MANDELAS, GEORGE 2407 N AIRPORT RD Residential - Single Family 931133 (18) CHILDRESS, ANNELIESE 2411 N AIRPORT RD Residential - Single Family 315233 (18) HRA VERGE OWNER LLC 2420 N AIRPORT RD Residential - !Multiunit 936233 (18) STATE OF WASH (CWU) FAC. Services - Governmental MGMT DEPT Legend owner Address / ELLENSBURG MILLER, MARTIN L ® Urban Growth Area Undeveloped - Land �] Tax Parcels Only MILLER, MARTIN L Classif=ication f" EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR i EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL X EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR FORD, ROBERT EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL Residential - Single Family FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR POWNALL, DONALD - - FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL Residential - Single Family FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR TIJTFQCT6TF }. -/ 19. Look Rd to Sanders Rd 20. Sanders to intersection of Future Connectors #21 and #39 21. Intersection of Future Connectors #20 and #39 to E Helena St 15017 1 15016 / 15015 15018 115020 j 15021 0 LO 1 15023 5024 ii './ � � :.�� J✓ELtFNS8UR6r�� �,��/ �/ �//� //f ��/�/ .� /'�,� �/��/�✓�.{J/� �,r 1,/,/ ,�,/�/ ♦/,�`" : / � � /. f� rf .///.//� '/ 0.05 0.1 0.2 Mil Parcel Impact Information: / !Parcel owner Address Land Use 547936 MILLER, MARTIN L SANDERS RD Undeveloped - Land 406636 MILLER, MARTIN L 1511 SANDERS RD Residential - Single Family 577936 COLLIGNON, ROBERT 291 LOOK RD Residential - Single Family 881236 FORD, ROBERT 1507 SANDERS RD Residential - Single Family 861236 POWNALL, DONALD 50 LENES RD Residential - Single Family 851236 HULL, MARK & KATIE 120 LENES RD Residential - Single Family 841236 MANSHIP, ESTHER S. LENES RD Undeveloped - Land 960456 SANDERS MILL LLC Undeveloped - Land 960450 SANDERS MILL LLC Undeveloped - Land 411133 SON VIDA I LLC 1606 SANDERS RD # A, Resource - Ag. Current Use 960450 SANDERS MILL LLC Undeveloped - Land Legend ELLENSBURG ® Urban Growth Area 0 Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR TAITFGSTATC 14943. : 14944 22. Look Rd to Future Connectors - . #23, #24, and #40 23. North extension from Future 14951 Connectors #22,#24, and #30 ILL ,..1;1�_ , LF] 15007 j 15008 j 15009 15017 r 15016 / 15015 J 15014 15010 15013 J 15012 �J 474634 a15018 115020 1 15021 1 15023 I 15024 J 15025 4D_ C4 /18607 18606 18605 18608 18604 18609 18603 18610 18611 18601 /r _..URGI' ':r 18600 18612 18599 18613 0.05 0.1 0.2 Mile Parcel Impact Information: Parcel owner Address Land Use 15025 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD MEADOWBROOK LN Resource - Ag. Current Use 10595 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC LOOK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 12583 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 639136 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC XXXXX LOOK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 12582 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 15025 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC MEADOWBROOK LN Resource - Ag. Current Use 474634 MOORE PROPERTIES LLC 1272 LOOK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 12583 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use Legend ELLENSBURG 0 Urban Growth Area 0 Tax Parcels Only Classifcation EXISTING MAIOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAIOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR TNTFRCTATF K11, 1315012 24. Game Farm Rd to intersection of Future Connectors #22, #23, and #40 4:M iC4 °° ap co 25 i 150 � 020736 "" � � ""' 40 01 10 a 474634 0 01 10584 N 10585 186Q7 /i' ' 18606 14049 794634 844634 18605 1 18608 ' 18604 18609 1 18603 8610 18601 18611 oo 18600 18612 18599 18613 18598 18614 lo 18597 18615 FA 374734 374734 740936 950271 9502721 950274 50736 � 1 950273 324634 Parcel Impact Information: 824634 19782 v co No 44634 234634NO c� 04 LO 20286 20287 0� CO M 254634 o COO 594634 varcel owner Aaaress Land use 18606 MOORE PROPERTIES LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 18607 MOORE PROPERTIES LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 12583 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 12584 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 12585 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use Legend/ 25. Vantage Hwy to Judge Ronald Rd ELLENSBURG / Urban Growth Area 955685 M [� Tax Parcels Only 124634 10, 334734 10 Classification 364734 LO LO EXISTING MAIOR COLLECTOR 314634 LO EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL 27 .;ac. EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAIOR COLLECTOR y '.' , , , � M Cl) cr) 00 OD 00 00 FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR 6 , t(r3 Nt V — INTERSTATE 604734 f = . , . / / ,;�.• / 924734 624734 624734 ,' , • r %/ 344834 P355436 20228 284734 20229 M r M M 614734 coV ,918436 20230 ^ %0 01 10 0 354834 N • ; , . i i �' -374834 .. M m 352033 00 � ELtENSBURGv o 0o a 0 1008810089 0 ,';r� 'r,' as ao o. 3b2033 a Cn 301933 �''•'f / r / ,r' �` t , `1 cr, 452033 Cr) 532033 141933 = N LO 3119 0.05 0.1 0.2 Mile Parcell Impact Information: Parcel Owner Address Land Use 944734 CITY OF ELLENSBURG Services - Governmental 824734 CAROLLO, CODY J 2218 JUDGE RONALD RD Residentiai - Single Family 374834 KIRKHAM, CHARLES 2321 VANTAGE HWY Residential - Single Family 355436 DEFOOR, DALE A 2391 VANTAGE HWY Trade - Other 918436 DEFOOR, DALE A 2391 VANTAGE HWY Trade Other Legend ELLENSBURG Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parceis Only Classification -- EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR �- EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLLCIOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR �.• TNTFRCTATF 374734 *'�0950273 Rd to Game Farm Rd 950274 254634 v C \ _ 1 f 374734 324634 1 594634 644634 614634 934634 18445 284634 14463418446 955683 955684 // • i V. 955685 334734 cn CV) 364734 M 314634 LO LO �✓`./�, ice; i 374734 *'�0950273 Rd to Game Farm Rd 950274 254634 v C \ _ 1 f 374734 324634 1 594634 644634 614634 934634 18445 284634 14463418446 955683 Parcel Impact Information: CC) co 00 00 604734 co M C) varcei owner Aaaress Lana use 474734 WAHLE, JOSEPH W JUDGE RONALD RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 374734 KOCH, GARY S 870 GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 955684 955685 334734 cn CV) 364734 M 314634 LO LO Parcel Impact Information: CC) co 00 00 604734 co M C) varcei owner Aaaress Lana use 474734 WAHLE, JOSEPH W JUDGE RONALD RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 374734 KOCH, GARY S 870 GAME FARM RD Resource - Ag. Current Use Legend ELLENSBURG ® Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parcels Only Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR TMTCQCTA-= 29. Bowers Rd to Look Rd J / /�/ ELLEENSBfU% � F / W 574434 1059 14943 00 USLE C REE!` 14951 t?%,:m FX LN 15006 15007 15017 1 15010- Parcel Impact Information: 14944 49481 49 15008 15009 o 0.'i Narcei owner Address Land Use 961148 Kittitas Co. (Airport) Services - Governmental Legend ELLENSBURG 18133 18135 F Urban Growth Area 0 Tax Parcels Only Classification 18130 18131 EXISTING MAIOR COLLECTOR 18132 EKISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR 31. Bender Rd to Bowers Rd EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL owner Address FUTURE MA70R COLLECTOR 541133 CITY OF ELLENSBURG - - FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL Services - Governmental 11489 FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR GAIL RD Undeveloped - Land INTERSTATE CITY OF ELLENSBURG 113 W BENDER RD Services - Governmental 11489 17 iyr , yr�k r o r .", X �.IX/ Parcel Impact Information: Parcei owner Address Land Use 541133 CITY OF ELLENSBURG 113 W BENDER RD Services - Governmental 11489 FALCON RIDGE INV LLC GAIL RD Undeveloped - Land 541133 CITY OF ELLENSBURG 113 W BENDER RD Services - Governmental 11489 FALCON RIDGE INV LLC GAIL RD Undeveloped - Land Parcel Impact Information: Parcel owner Address land Use 946233 TOWER, LES & JOANNE A 1001 SANDERS RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 955311 KMTFAS CO (AIRPORT) UNKNOWN Services - Governmental 955294 KITiITAS CO (AIRPORT) UNKNOWN Services - Governmental 955295 KMTfAS CO (AIRPORT) UNKNOWN Services - Governmental 955278 Ki1TITAS CO (AIRPORT) UNKNOWN Services - Governmental 584634 KITMAS CO (AIRPORT) UNKNOWN Services - Governmental Legend ELLENSBURG ® Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parcels Only ClassifCation EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR �- EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR INft."IAlt 444':35 r 665333-1 F3 . 4. 6533-134. E Umptanum Rd extension east 705333 695333 .5--. .. 364736 675333 186331 r � �-i �/yJ �f 628633 11363" , 298533 - - 17 34 .�.....--., _------- . - ---- ELLENSBURG :' S9- 3c 4 �J i Parcel Impact Information: i 955621 663537 138633 M CN C14 T" M J f ' 17826 N •J �ON0 Cl) rarcell owner A CIMS5 Land Use 298533 LATHROP DEVELOPMENT CO K=AS HWY Undeveloped - Land 138633 RDMB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP K=AS HWY Resource - Ag. Current Use Legend i ; 35. Capitol Ave to PFenning Rd ELLENSBURG // / 245233/1. ® Urban Growth Area / /� " >: 712033 Q Tax Parcels Only 722033 Classification 802033 EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR irtj , EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL 732033 812033 /,"; /, ,////'/ ' / /; ''rh EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR / /// .� EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL j/ / . j / 15082 1 FUTURE MA30RCOLLLCIUR :��./��,�''/ �j'�!.,'/ ,3�,•/ 3�1b51933 FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL -� — _ _-- -- '- - - — 15083 1,. FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR /,` INTERSTATE , / 942133 �bry /PD 4v 112133 ryN i 072033 Ob2033 032033 / :; 052033 042033 .38 63 N cv C14 15210 132033 �% / M 710936 00292033 "ELLENSBURG e.°' 951864 X11. 4 922033 322033 10 � 10219 ZT, 0 0 10220 092033 f 138533 3 / j - 0.05 0.1 0.2 Mile Parcel Impact Information: Parcel owner Address land Use 19500 SHAW, RUSTY J & KRISTIN 312 OAK ST Residential - Single Family 382636 OCONNOR, ROLLAND 414 S MT DANIELS DR Residential - Single Family 484136 KELLY, MIKE & KAREN 308 OAK ST Residential - Single Famliy 372636 BAKER, HAROLD H 406 S MT DANIELS DR Residential - Single Family 362636 ROBISON, STEVE ETUX 318 S MT DANIELS DR Residential - Single Family 112133 ONEILL, NEIL L ETUX 303 S MT DANIELS DR Residential - Single Family 535333 BUSH, ROBERT P 1700 E CAPITOL AVE Residential - Single Family 17767 WICKERATH, JAMES 1706 E CAPITOL AVE Residential - Single Family Legend ELLENSBURG Urban Growth Area Q Tax Parmis Only Classification EXISTING MAIOR COLLECTOR — EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR — EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAIOR COLLECTOR - FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR TNTFRCTATF 1577111 36. Extension of Bowers east of Look 574434 5544341 %/5744341 10591 14945 14946 14944 14943 ,,;:s':, �;:: �r•. ; 14947 474634 14948 14951 14950 15011 15006 1 15007 15008 1 15009 15010 -> P 0.05 0.1 Parcel Impact Information: Parcel Owner Address Land Use 474634 MOORE PROPERTIES LEC 1272 LOOK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 10591 HANSBERRY, ]EFF W ETUX 1270 LOOK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use Legend ; :.__._;:` 37. Greenfield Rd connection between ELLENSIiURG _ developments ®Urban Growth Area F' Q Tax Parcels Only Classification - s EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR 959777 } -- EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL ' _ � � k J. � EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR -- EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL I FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR I I I t --r ""1^_ l T- i - FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL _ __ __ s t , .i FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR 1 — TNTEITTTI R5TATE I 1 -J 5`-- F - ` I ;L0 I I.11 Lr f26623a - --. ELLENSBURGE-3 6�( .. q k ! T -Ti + ! a ,?3" 24 62 i .�'36 11 .331- a� - 316233 + r ! 19798 r- 5 33 2733 1CJ-� I ch s i 127.53 i M.; 2 Y66233 CIO (n 73J 1 TM, — �, ; -- + �r 0.05 ().'10.2 Mile: Parcel Impact Information: Parcel owner Address land Use 941133 MCKINNEY REVOCABLE LIV 308 E BENDER RD Residential - Single Family TRUST Legend ELLENSBURG ® Urban Growth Area 0 Tax Panels Only Classification — EXISTING MAIOR COLLECTOR EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAIOR COLLECTOR FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR 4,1//Z//-//� 38. Canyon Rd to Berry Rd 1NIL" IAIt / i 158633 960547 //J/�� 258936 / Parcel Impact Information: 638436 varcei uwner Aaaress Lana use 668733 VALLEY LAND COMPANY LLC 470 BERRY RD Resource - Aa. Current Use Legend 95$001 ELLENSBURG ; ® Urban Growth Area f I Q Tax Parcels Only f 10876 f Classification EXISTING MAJOR COLLECTOR 10576 EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL 10575 EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR I EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL + 10879 i 10878 FUTURE MAJOR COLLECTOR I i FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTORIr- INTERSTATE f � f �4 13171 I 341133` 9x6-04.49 39. Extension of Greenfie-d Ave east 10574 105]2 351133 8112361801236 N A I I ^ [ o° 18212361 ff f f I 10 !! 312361 1 00 ' 871236 f -0l 577936 00 0 j 567936 406636 l <<l ,75479361 1 1557936 Li�_y- 961�45C~a - _ !755536 f 9,5-4445 f I ] 936233 r T F- ELLENSBURG L� 7• -x I- F.. J. i f 411:1:?3 4 f ! 2&2,&3 18545 r ,461133 l t6, 34 01,4 J :4 37s ? O.QS 0.1 0.2 Mile Parcel Impact information: Parcel Owner Address land Use 960450 SANDERS MILL LLC BENDER RD Undeveloped - Land Legend —15544341 574434 ELLENSBURG Land Use Urban Growth Area HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC Q Tax Parcels Only 14945 14946 Classification MOORE PROPERTIES LLC EXISTING MANOR COLLECTOR Resource - Ag. Current Use — EXISTING MINOR ARTERIAL 18604 EXISTING MINOR COLLECTOR Resource - Agriculture • EXISTING PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL FUTURE MAIOR COLLECTOR 948 FUTURE MINOR ARTERIAL FUTURE MINOR COLLECTOR f14947 0 INTERSTATE _.� 15008 15009 15410 LO 15015 1 15014 15013 1502115023 15024 22 �j 15012 ' 1M N 15025 S 40. East extension from Future Connector #22 (East off of Look Rd) 474634 Pame! Impact Information: 574634 ,o c+� M 504634 C9 544634 C9 SO 1%0 OD 0 r w 020736 0101 00 00 10584 10585 14049 794634844634 824634 19782 0.05 0.1 0.2 Mile 4Q Parcei 18607 Address Land Use 15025 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC MEADOWBROOK LN 18606 474634 MOORE PROPERTIES LLC 18605 18608 18609 Resource - Ag. Current Use 020736 18604 2512 WILLOWDALE RD Resource - Agriculture 18603 18610 Pame! Impact Information: 574634 ,o c+� M 504634 C9 544634 C9 SO 1%0 OD 0 r w 020736 0101 00 00 10584 10585 14049 794634844634 824634 19782 0.05 0.1 0.2 Mile 4Q Parcei owner Address Land Use 15025 HAYBROOK LAND HOLD LLC MEADOWBROOK LN Resource - Ag. Current Use 474634 MOORE PROPERTIES LLC 1272 LOOK RD Resource - Ag. Current Use 020736 LANCE, ?ONI L ETAL 2512 WILLOWDALE RD Resource - Agriculture EXHIBIT 3: UGA PARCELS IMPACTED Page 4 of 4 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 RMERa: _— zzZzm?m0000 C i ¢ a Z Z D Z) 3 J J J J 2�— ar a a 000000 U U U cU Cl) m 22 O 2009999 y "'N to W NON CD N cG' P -:="I._ pOd: ql II~ I; O Lr r 00 Ln OD CO Ir N C D� CO � r N� O C0 CO CO O O O N O It LO O 0) a0 1D PI -. O ti Iti L O O O ,, O - N R N OD N 'T CO r Ld CO N N CD Ln OR q CO CO Co q: O O OD O O M it Cp 00 OD O �u, CC CO I� C7 LO NNNCDOD--TNNM�7 N0- r*COMtiMItCA-rV CV C4G6 Cr NO LOC?C)CV C^c•': L.()NrMm CnCn(nmfnmX Nto(n(nmU)mCACnU)mU)U)U)U)mCOmCl) (f)CANm W mmmNmCnto0CnCnU)Cl) m W WwwWW'JwwwwW WWwwwWwW WwwW W WLUW WwW W W W W WWwLLJwwWwW IxIxxQ� I=xx0�>rwOcfl�wofofw>rlyir0�wwC� C�ofOfw0� C�ofww0�Ofww 0 www aaaaaaEaaaQ¢aaQaaaaaaaaa¢¢aaaaaa¢aa¢aQaaa¢¢¢ C C - LL 0 CD N Cy C C C� LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL C C w C C C m c c c c c c e e a� E E E E c E m a� a� a� a� m na m�� c c ar m m ❑ m m m 7 m m m m N m E EEE 7 7 7- cm m co m 0) 0) ED 07 m CT CO m m CO M m 3 m CD 7 7 7 J J J C•) J J J J J J C y (D () (J (� C J C_ J C_ C_ C_ C_ C_ C_ J J J J c U U J C_ U U U CT 9 O�� C7 0 0 0 0 p� 0 [n [n a (n Cn CO CO V) z o •0 a s 'O CO m C. Co m a) ao oQ a�n�a�n �anroCDC7i7C7QaaC7iv 0-ia fl w —a —a —Q m CL CL o CL CL @aaa -� LuO O O 67 0 0 0 0 0 O :� N "' - O '- O '� ---- Q� - 0 0 0 0 N 0 CD O 0 N N T ty Q1 C C(D C m m ��C iCsaC +�c'ecc ce'U7 z(D •- �N �0jN C aCU C vN :2N :2N 2N 'RN oN a :2000E 0a'Da'0'DT x102222(D CD N0 0 C C c C F- wDM» > w co w cn w x m x (0 x D x xwxxxx0�»»wwcrnwafxx ❑ . r Q❑❑ ❑Q❑ W LU W UYJW WLU }QW m w w > w w93smwLL, < U) YY �Y0.IKa UC7}C7C7� W LL W W W Z>LwwLI W W UUUW DC U W W W J }}}}}X WJ JJ}afY� W ¢CYC (r(LLIrl)W ¢ fr ❑www�r�wl�l� ��r❑❑❑❑❑��Q< 0 O MMly W �00a-0C CL W 000JaUU m ❑a�0��IrmR0M ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ Ww aa❑ Luz IL (L �w¢W¢¢ ���XLUwLLU V?� wl� g ��L�r)OOazD00000ZO�O�I�nL�no�i�VR❑d❑❑�UUU�w0U 4'�� W Fr ❑❑❑u m3: 3: coo ❑ ❑ W MCMCLW)NlI_ Www ww 0�M wwwww� ci crv��r�waarDpao'DCDDwwwoz w rU000'M022 0m 3:3:: zZZ.ZZr�r� NNNNNNN NN'0 �[Y J J w Z J ❑ Q otf CY5 a(y at) O W W J w } (n U 0 D »> 0a aQ W W J J a 'U L) ZwZZ U 000 C7���cr) ❑U) 06 ca 0U'J �JU.I WXJJ Z W ;Z 9O OJOO UxUU mj??mwwwD�❑°A❑°d w(L_JLU W Ovi n O wmmmmJJJmQ❑ W ❑(nWr� Q w mwwpx W w U U) Uwfr�❑coo LL .0 ~Z U)1—}I`-H JCnCnCnCn<<<rnZJ JJCnJOfzcndJ ❑❑ W ZQQ� U ca ZmamJM _gym TH www W W❑ZZZZ wO,�m�-rWmr'Cf0— Z_ jQ� <JJJJQQQJZ�(ijj-5<<ofm•��� w W❑OWC7 W WUJ wWWQYWUJ 0. W W WO(DO WO �❑ ZwwJU,,UU W W W } W W Y }Y YYz Nm NCnNN— rw�rWHH CO U Z(nLLLLLLLL LLCOZ(�ZOLLwOZ❑wJ=JJ W (L'w'O2Zw'� �I _YOOOO�tn�ip�0Y0 ❑wU) YJW JJr0U}cn000 r Www Wr rC7 rZ Qw m O :Qw'QQoaQrR� ❑Yw}}}}zZZ�p�W�u!0ZM0C7w w22 }}�Q❑> } wamwHF— H_ _-ZawawoDO❑armJmMR,ftmQ"'C7C7w(r aQo.a�L1 war 000U¢00 m: co �O❑mcnUmrnM❑❑¢zm❑❑ (00Co(0 MO (p MMMMM-m CD MOM OD0rlwWM _MM 'MMMMce)V)m ['?C+'3J�MMMMMLO(Jti�MMMMMLOCoC3)0NMOO WCAMMN cme, c7 NNNC%l0 co ISM 0OO ti tiOt�OrMMLnmLOLONO_OO��O__O CD [O co CO CDtDLC)MCA LOM(O(DOOCOCOCOOti(DLOOLC]f-M MCACANN N COCDrr CD LO it M Co OD (O N N CO N N S 0) M r CO (D 0 Liz OD O) N CM LO N N IO O CO (o CD W M LO V IT M N LO LO Coco MNrLf) (NrCOODOODOD--r0) Il- NCONLOrr-rNNOW OOOOD- - NO OC 00 k- r r r r r r- -- r T- - N N N N N N N CV N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M't 'f V V 0 LO LO CD z 000000000000000000000000000000000000 J J J J J J J O crrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 0 r,UVc�c�Uc;c:UUUUUUUU��UUUUU�UU�UUUUUUUUUU¢aaaaaa� �wwwwwwwLuwwwwwwwwLJlwwwLuwwwLuwwwwwwwwwww������� W J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J LL uj w W W W w J J J J J ..�� ...� J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J -a J J J J J J J J J J r r F r r r� J 0000Oo0o000000000000000000000000000owwwwwwwv VUUUUc;c�UVUVUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUaaaaaaa*� frfY mmwCCw0.wwwwxwwx=wxwxw www ww=w wJY[YV WfrWMa 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz2:zzz:�:2:�:�;�;�;?:�;�:�:�zzzzzzzz zi EL— a 2zzzzg� ¢gym 0 OOOO u)m��❑0.d Ili}LL= -1 -j JLLQ W. M Lf) LO(7frmcaincaJJ J Z CD CAC33N N r' <`M NNNXI- aaa Na ONOr— rNI.-COCb OL^... C^, r� Pi C7O�'$�Nr-- N' NOOOOOOC;5-; flti�N 10 LO 11]O:^. :n OV'O la L(?l0m nl W W W OOC W 0» N N O O O O O O O(n fn 0U) OR co W w w w w w L_u 44 L w w w w w Z w w W W W w w LLL W www w W w w w w w w w p p W p w w w p�rzc�c���a�����zz�z��� a¢aa¢Qa¢¢aaaaa¢a�a¢�a�¢¢a�a¢a¢¢¢¢¢a¢aac¢n(¢nac¢ia¢¢a :li Q 0 m G) >, in A T T >, w >, >. >, , >, >, >, >, A a) > 0 d n w N h cr f Um O) W N! J1 w �--- W N LO N �..� �EEEEE —mmmm EEEEE @@ c C G G G C C C C c G G` c C C m m m m m C@@@@ w G m@ m@ m C C C C C G a) @ m m a7 @ al w a) LL LL W LL LL ay LL W LL LL • 0 LL LL w LL LL O O L L L L C222.2 --c 0 0 Q 7 E 9 0 0 0 GJ .0-0-0 2� N N N L L L L t t- t C a) C C C C G c� a>>cL�� c5 cc�ccEEma�0)aw,crnCD0D)EE@0)cpcm amm@mm@mn� 0 V 0 0 0 U U L) 0 0 0 U U 0'0 - O O) J G C C C C U C c c C 7 O J ,C C C C C J J J U J (.) U U 3 :1 a > -a) rniniAin�g ?�in�nv��nin ov a rn� cn wwaa�daae aaa�z Zc°�(°� -----a-----(°7 --- - -- w va Q��a a c� c� c� is co @ @ a W W @ (o m n M n a U cJ U U v v U U U U L) O � •! •� t t r t d C7 c c a O O O 02 O t� U U Q7 Qi a% �+ of L L L V> 7> 7 .7 � 0 0 0 C3 0 0 c O c 0 0 0 0 0 m��� c� c a a o�� 8-:2 o,v_M a� m m 0 a� 0 0 0 aa) (1)a`E) (1) �3)0m�a0)0)C4)a)aa)caiayiayiayiayin)mai(D9) caia�a) faaiccca�aa) a� wtoifwm x==mmIr XMfrX�w� 1211��wwm nZ)wLL'W'�'W'»D MW'W'W' a no 00 :tk 1 -Ya❑ ❑ QwQ❑❑WQ❑ jxxw rr O0.' Y w w w ww W❑❑ W❑ D ❑❑ 2 2 2 r- xW 3 2 0 0 0 ❑� U ❑ 0) DO x � rZWz�: zz�X aG ¢IL <<zU¢aaa aw�Lu w w 2 z��❑���m°�0❑�¢» on 0 <<w�Qaaa Wao¢wz� a Q�LLLL �w wm zZzzz==�z=zzz 00(nzw(n cn W 00O2TOaTJ J0a r W W 0r -00r-0 COI-- TO ZTJti WJw 0 ❑4Ym O W p r (p '0 r p O 2 r r m M 0 0 0 r O 0 0 r O— N T O O Z O nom r N 00 tl". f� O](D ����gN f4 -T V 4 aLf) 05Lo0Nw (c Oa NfYT�rrV)Tmmzr=T W W NNNNNrNNNNN (nrN� -LCjrJ r �-1 UU w Q as �0 waw ZQ JJJ a _ (n U ¢ J y }} ar 0ad0= 0= a o❑D c��� w¢ ad w C r a r U U z H Z Z OOJ }w} a2J =00-1 UJa 0 7�W_j ' �yYe ADD 00 wyw LL LL �ZJwaatS❑� 06❑ww�3 �.6 Lu u) 000 SSW -J ad zZ0 LU LU W UvjcpJ❑wJz wJOfw WU J JW=Qr� V U 0222 (7 C7az�Z�UUwwUUVUUQOYW'O❑z�O�Wry¢Oazr�ZO ���JJ Jaaa Z Z J J Z Z J J J J Z r J J V J U U Z ❑>- S ❑ (t� W❑ � J J J J J J J �aLU Luw©DULuwww�Ua �z �Oz -C6, << Yw��-2YYY ��w-�co ca wJ�JzZQ'Q�d'zzzzLL LuwO WX-0Lu<w(DLL�M0 J� 000 co co mzz() !)mmomJJWwwW W W W Wa0_2WLZwcdzW WWLUD &(��aM=Ww5wwxm ZZU❑ ❑ wwJJFwLuwLuw�_aW� mD w z JJ0 O ZZ22aZZZZaPZUO0pYzgopYz�gQJJJ0.'gJzZzzZ} } J J 0 a 0 a W w 0 0 0 w W W w r ❑ U O= U a = U a= H O p O =)<<<O<<<< ww03:U�;0LL W W0aLL W W Wu)Ym22 2=3:1--220=(n2 oLLQ=2(n(nu)(n=== MrMMM�°MMMMM!°MCQOOgO OMMMOMO7�1MM0�Mc�MMM�d000m 00 T 0 0 0 0 0 CC N N N (0 O O O r 0 0 0 N NIl* -r t-OCID LL`I,-NO0CACA MI�I�O O N (G CSS I-0I-rrrrQOrOOl0l0 m�m���M(OJM� tim'CY�MLL+iMI^+ NN�rrOODO�ir�OMiM Lr) LO000�coco C0-- CpCDI� OD 00 C00A0000rrrN-----O(O(O----- W-0--O—CilCAOO TrNNN 4- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r T N N N N N N N w (Y LL m 0. m LL w m x m QL w w LL m LL LL LL w w w w Ir LL w w LL li w LL LL w x x w w w w Ids w IL w w 0L 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 r r r H r t- r r r r r r r +- r r r r r r r r F r- r l- r r r r r r r r r r r 1-- UUUUUUUUU(uUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUt3Ut�c�UUUUUUUUc� W W W W W Www :IJ W W W W W 1L! W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w W J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 UUYiUUVVVtiVVVVUUUVUUUUUUUUVciUUVUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Z z Z Z z Z Z Z Z z z Z z z Z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z z z z z waw axXIr �Wm 0 F W W Wd'm W� LL W2LL m a ��� ��❑�❑�❑gym w W w W w 0 Q =2 = �`2= _ao W Xmmm CDC co CD ca CD CG CDU 2 0 (� co � r O O O -.(n+LOn OLdn OLLn IN M�1�LnMON O �O- NMN NO(OtiNNOMN�0000[1.O�OOOriO0NNC4N�C14CNNOn d (nOrNMT006ja�NOtnC0Ir /T� T/�yy////T/d/%/C�• /T� �T/� /N� c7 N �M/� 00: (M/� �r/� �/M� �M/� �M/� �M/� �r/� �M/� �r/� co �T/� �W/� �• I�/----------- W - T T �- �- - c- �- �- �r/� �N/� ��/� rO/)� �N/')� //VJInYJVJWWWW 0cofnN V!w!(n (nU)(A(nVJ (nVJVI V/Nto(0co V! V! wV!(nV/ fn Ixw�Cfaawwwwx���xxaw:w����ww��w�xwxaxxaaaofofofofwceir U 00 U U U 000000 U U U U U U 0 U U U U U U U Qu U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U aaQ¢aaa¢a¢aaaaa¢a¢;:aaaa¢¢aaa¢aa¢aaa¢aa¢¢¢aaaaa (0 CD 0i CS ❑❑❑❑❑❑�»❑S'E'E O❑ m❑ ca � ❑ Sa o cog u DEEEEEEEEEEEOM .r �+ rr •+ w+ C CU m C C C C C C C C m M M M M M M M M m M d N N RD: 00 0 ` 0 (U LL LL � r_ (D y .� m .p N _, 2 N N 07 0) 0) v LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL W LL 1L GC7 N E E E(nm ��cEc EEEEEc�a�a�a�wwma�mma�a��� 7 7 0 7 0 .7 .mm m m m` p} O 7 3 E 3 m` m` m 3 E E E w 0 (A Z77 in CD 0) 0 CD CDS (m 7 7 U U U U U U U U U U m c C U U sy U J 6 -J J U m m as m J U E- c c c c c c c c c c U U (�inmininincnininu3� a� �n w a �c a Qo a(5 0 c� c� c� Q� a a°' j{j Qy (9 C(f L t 0 O O C 05 M@ M@ M m m m m m m C C C C C C C C C C C` 7 7 7 7 7 7 0) N 7 7 c) 7 7 U C7 .c� O 7 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O •- ._ ._ C O 07 •- M •- d 0 •- (U :D :0 a'p 79 :2 :2 : '9:2:2 0 0 mmama (1) (1)' �a�ia�ia�imcmcaicmmmaia�ia�ic ma`�vayia�mmayin�ayid�� W'd' W'4'axxOf& L'm�W'FFW'W'(0x❑m❑m❑aNm(nUU❑W' W'a' W' W' W' W' W'W' W'�'d'12 a z Q��ma o a o oww 000 Y ZZ22❑r2 W' 0.' W' W_ LJL W_ LJj,]JJ m�aERwaitE �� ao❑❑ ❑ U W W W J X } W w (n Z Z Z Z Y g W Q Q Q Z LLL g❑ ❑ w¢ ¢ ¢ ¢~~ 0mEDYx2WIxw c CDf-FF0WZZ0z z ❑ZZZZZMMWW w WOWO¢¢YY w❑ J W W w w w W >>> Z Z W x X� z z Z Z Z I~ W W J J —0o W�J�JT�CYYYY�FOO(n0(n0( w0 00 NO QW=„¢aaa¢¢ NCV) MCgZ)1�Zz�M�QnrQ�/yozZZZZ��r�r0Oo-o0�P-NN ('�T(jC7(7(7()[� NNNNM00�� Tt„JrIJT��»❑YYMM� M�MMMMTTTT UU �U�-J JJJ'"'jJ J J J J J U U U z fn fn Z Q 000w90 W!y00a' W a F F F J F W X N U0 W W O(nZZF �F-x J F f- ❑ z_ Z z_ Z Z z Z —��--^ M W W W w W J J J W J W WJJJ(r}J W 000 00O000a,�ym J ¢ W J J Z W FF U W �F FFF- w FFFFFW �cn X W W �Cn(n(7fnofnz wwwxmzRRoZ W z�Z W ❑❑❑MMM�❑d❑❑❑m�J } ¢¢=acy�(n(n OQW�w�wz00000WFYYzwxsWFwx (00� W W �mZmZQW W W W �'OQatlotS �2�w�� W �W �����J �� W� W WLL ❑ W zzz z zzz(n C WOWZ yJwWmaZZWOWO°�¢¢Q¢¢LULu m—m—-----wWJ a w w 0L�s - J���� YYYaYQaY�CYJU0000(t0 000LLOLLLLOOOWp� �am��w�w�J��mm�Wg W 0'--i—WOU000❑F(n(n YQ UYwm�Q� �o =�zyzo LLQ 000 O OOOLLJ 00 ppW'WWWWW'W'W' JLOOW mppm}m[Xm��mpompp 00=00,_j±t= C7 ❑❑LLZLLZ Om �� LU ¢JJ �¢a¢¢¢0 z O _ wwm w0000wHHH1^H��2��yz>-LLJ >- -i '2 3<: aQQOQOO¢a �¢a W QOh�� r4, WQW O W ZD=�Oa W 222�2��222UUY❑❑�yYYUUULLULLFYYYYY Q QO�H1F--H J�(n(AOYmY�YOm��z O � ���CDCO�si'00MOC+') M Mr�YOC'A�MM CD CDO(OCDCDM MNLnMMOtiM� LnMMMMMMMd•M0M0MO(+] (7�1�M^'7[7OOMMMMMMM [� T TCDN0wC)000wwr-[-00It�t[-[-T_C>0 MTMNMNNN 00W900rCO�-COrTC'9000 0 Ln O � LO (O w In 0 0 d' le v 0 w Nt d• Y T cD Ln LC) Ln Ln V co CD Ln Ln N � N � N It N LD [- 'V' Ln M N L0 1• N CO CA N N NV N n WV [� (O CQ (D � T � � � 10 Ln Ln Ln 0D M M 0 0 00 00 1,- 00 CD 00 r M O CDrr T T T T T T mMMM0 M0v 00 T L() 00 0 01nN T T T M"tC'0 �M"tT w TC( r N N N N 04 CM N N N N N Ln LL7 Ln Ln N N" M 0 T T T N N N N N N V' A M M C`�'? C`MO M M cMg C`M'S CMq M COQ C9 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M 00000000000000000JJJJJJJ JJJJJ00 JJ JJJJ00 FFFHFFFI- FFFFFFFF F'Q aaa¢Q4��¢¢aaaUUa¢aaaaF- 00F U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U ---- ---------- 00 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww W C'ofw WwwwwwC'xmW W �XW'0' W'W IX W'C' W'wW J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J W W W W W W W W W w W J J 00000000000000000m�'Xao'X����cxwooxxwwwmxxxxixc0 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUaa¢¢¢¢¢aaaaaauUaaaaaaaaaa¢UU www=wax ax0�wD� 0� C�axwww0�wmxaofofxw0� 0�axxawwC� 0� 0�xww0�wx 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 zzzzzzzzzzzz_z_z_z_z_zzzzzzzzzzzzzz_ zZZzzzZzzzzZz k CL 27�r-gLO cm§Go -: w0M00oc U)mwU)mU) wwowww �0�2Of0� 0� ¢k$a¢a �\ kk LLk£kk B 0��� < OL /§D » 0 8 0 0 0 B @ 2 @ @ § /RSLf) ACori witC%j=w It822/q ooc_o wco0000 CV) nn___ 000000 eweewe QQQOQo wLUwwLuw _j-1-1_j-j_j -i-j-j-i-j-j 000000 000000 X2xxxx 000000 222222 222 22 KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: August 23, 2021 TOPIC: American Public Works Association Conference Presentation ACTION REQUESTED: Support Staff Efforts LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Support staff efforts messaging I-90 congestion impacts to rural County roads. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • The 2021 American Public Works Association is meeting in Yakima • Staff is teaming with Fehr and Peers presenting our I-90 bypass traffic experience • Good opportunity logging public outreach for the STEER I-90 coalition BACKGROUND: The American Public Works Association meets annually providing a forum for local government communication on emerging issues statewide. This year, the event is being held in Yakima. Fehr and Peers, the consultant supporting Upper County Traffic Committee efforts, is offering to team with staff presenting our experience. DISCUSSION: Nicole Ogan will present on behalf of the County. A draft presentation outline is attached (EXHIBIT 1) for Board review. Recent conversations with congressional staff affirm the value of public outreach efforts supporting STEER I-90 efforts. Our experience may be beneficial to other rural communities in Washington suffering from wayfinding vehicle software and associated traffic impacts on rural road networks. FISCAL IMPACTS: None anticipated. The Transportation/Environmental Planner is fully budgeted in our Public Works Administration 2021 budget. Fehr and Peers is presenting on their own behalf without charge to the County. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Presentation outline. Page 1 of 2 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 EXHIBIT 1: PRESENTATION OUTLINE Page 2 of 2 Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 2021 APWA Conference in Yakima WA October 13-14, 2021 Rural Traffic Calming: Waze and Means June 07, 2021 1. Citizen lead effort responding to 1-90 bypassing traffic (5 minutes — Nicole) a. Lobby for county resources and resident committee formulation. b. Intro to committee and funding. 2. How Public Works has responded (10 minutes —Nicole and Fehr and Peers) a. Traffic study vetting local options to congestion in targeted areas. b. Traffic calming device evaluation and suggestions for rural deployment. 3. Rural traffic calming deployment discussion (10 minutes— Fehr and Peers) a. Building consensus for countermeasures b. Strategies deployed. 4. Board of County Commission response (5 minutes — Nicole) a. Federal lobbyist — The Ferguson Group b. Coalition creation — STEER 1-90 5. Accomplishments and Ongoing efforts (10 minutes— Nicole) a. Enforcement b. Monitoring and evaluation of calming devices/treatments c. Public outreach and involvement d. Assess impacts to county roads and safety e. Resolutions and ordinances f. Navigation app contact/requests 6. Q and A (15 minutes) 55 -minute run time.