Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-03-25-minutes-public-works-study-sessionKITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Public Works Study Session Regular Meeting Monday March 25, 2019 - 1:30 PM Commissioners' Auditorium 205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg 1. Call to Order 2. Request to Approve a Resolution to Authorize the Chair's Signature on the Digital Submittal Certification to the County Road Administration Board 3. Request to Approve a Resolution Stating the Board of County Commissioners' Position of "No Net Loss" for Access on Public Roads 4. Property Transfer of Tax Parcel 693835 - City of Cie Elum Discussion 5. 2019 Spring Flood Update 6. Flood Alleviation at Bowers Field 7. Other business 8. Adjourn Created on 3/21/2019 9:31:03 AM KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION MINUTES COMMISSIONERS' AUDITORIUM, 205 WEST 5TH ROOM 109 - Regular Meeting MONDAY 1:30 PM MARCH 25, 2019 Board members present: Chairman Cory Wright; Commissioner Laura Osiadacz Others: Mark Cook, Candie Leader, Public Works; Dan Carlson, Dusty Pilkington, Mike Flory, Community Development Services At 1:58 pm Chairman Cory Wright opened the Public Works Study Session. REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON THE DIGITAL SUBMITTAL CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD Mark Cook presented the resolution for approval and stated that this is an annual certification that is submitted to the County Road Administration Board for reporting purposes. Commissioner Laura Osiadacz made a motion to approve Resolution 2019-060 Authorizing the Chair's Signature on the Digital Submittal Certification to the County Road Administration Board. Chairman Cory Wright seconded the motion. Motion passed 2-0. REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION STATING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' POSITION OF "NO NET LOSS" FOR ACCESS ON PUBLIC ROADS Mark Cook stated that the Board of County Commissioners has been working with the Public Lands Advisory Committee and other stakeholders regarding access on public roads. Mark Cook continued that Public Works finalized the resolution for approval. Chairman Cory Wright expressed his thanks to Commissioner Laura Osiadacz for her efforts on this and Mark Cook added that Chairman Cory Wright was also passionate on this issue. Commissioner Laura Osiadacz stated that she also appreciates all the work that has been done from staff and stakeholders. Chairman Cory Wright made a motion to approve Resolution 2019-061 Stating the Board of County Commissioners' Position of "No Net Loss" for Access on Public Roads. Commissioner Laura Osiadacz seconded the motion with said motion passing 2-0. PROPERTY TRANSFER OF TAX PARCEL 693835 - CITY OF CLE ELUM DISCUSSION Mark Cook stated at a previous study session he spoke to the Board about the City of Cle Elum requesting to acquire Tax Parcel 693835 for a potential dog park. Mark Cook continued that at that study session the Board requested staff research the value of the tax parcel. Mark Cook added that the market value for the parcel is one hundred dollars 2019-03-25 MINUTES ($100) and Public Works pays four dollars and ninety-one cents ($4.91) annually in property taxes. Mark Cook commented that under RCW 39.33.060 property can be transferred for park and recreational uses. Mark Cook stated that the City of Cle Elum would need to formally request a letter to the Board stating the intention of creating the dog park and request the transfer of the tax parcel. Mark Cook added that he will have the Prosecuting Attorney's office verify the RCW mentioned is valid and bring back to the Board. Staff was directed to move forward with the process and have legal confirm that RCW 39.33.060 is appropriate to transfer the tax parcel. 2019 SPRING FLOOD UPDATE Mark Cook reported that last week he and staff attended a meeting with area irrigators and the City of Ellensburg to discuss potential flooding and some areas of concern. Mark Cook continued that at the time of the meeting the weekend forecast was predicting flooding, however, none was reported. Mark Cook added that he did meet onsite with DR Horton and Ellensburg Water Company at Blackhorse to discuss the light flooding there. FLOOD ALLEVIATION AT BOWERS FIELD Mark Cook stated that for the past two and a half (2.5) years staff has been working on flooding models for Bowers Field and surrounding areas. Mark Cook continued that the Flood Control Zone District had also participated in some work ahead of the Environmental Assessment and with some trial and error found alternatives to relieve the runway flooding. Mark Cook added that the path forward to explain to the Federal Aviation Administration the significance of the alternatives and request some funding to help with the engineering that will need to be completed. Discussion was held. Meeting adjourned at 2:14 pm. 2019-03-25 MINUTES KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cory Wright, Chairman BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - M AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON THE DIGITAL SUBMITTAL CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD FOR 2018 ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES WHEREAS: The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires annual reporting of various Road Fund expenditures by the County Engineer; and WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor, County Engineer and the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners are required to annually certify Road Fund diversions supporting Traffic Law Enforcement (TLE) activities; and WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor and County Engineer have all signed the certification reporting $199,803.77 in 2018 Road Fund diversion; and WHEREAS: The County Engineer has signed the required reports and said reports are now ready for Chair signature; and WHEREAS: The Chair of the Board of County Commissioners signature is now required to complete 2018 County Road Administration Board (CRAB) reporting requirements; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's signature on the Digital Submittal Certification to the County Road Administration Board for 2018 Road Fund Expenditures. DATED this 25th day of March, 2019, at Ellensburg, Washington. Attest: Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik , 1,,,,0,R0ttAts/Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz J per, `• _r..1�.�-�L7��1�1 _F•. � L;. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cory Wri t, Chairman ABSENT Brett Wachsmith, Vice -Chairman Lura Os Corj>i4ssioner C.A.R.S Kittitas County 2018 CERTIFICATION OF ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT WAC 136-150-022 Page 1 of 1 Total Road Levy: Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $4,178,221.31 021): Actual Road Levy revenue produced: $4,174,140.17 Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Levv Diversion Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $199,996.88 021): Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy: $199,803.77 Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and identifiable account (RCW 36.82.040): Yes Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Fund Expenditures: Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00 Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00 Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures: $199,803.77 Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS): $218,610.00 RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including traffic law enforcement, as are allowed by Article ll, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account. This form must be reviewed and certified (on the "Engineer's Certification Form") by: • County Sheriff • County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer • Chair, Board of County Commissioners OR County Executive https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019 C.A.R.S. Kittitas County Annual Certification For Calendar Year 2018 WAC 136-04 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION A. During 2018 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified in RCW 36.80.030. B. At any time during 2018 was there a vacancy/change in the position of County Engineer? If so, were the procedures in WAC 136-12 followed? Page 1 of 2 Explanation: County Engineer, Gregory L Huck resigned employment as of 4-1-2018. Board Resolution for Interim Acting County Engineer 2018-066 appointed Mark Cook, licensed professional engineer. Yes Yes C. The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2018 complied with WAC 136-28. Yes D. Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the arterial road Yes system in 2018 per WAC 136-14-020. E. As of December 31, 2018 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies set by the county legislative authority including, but not limited to, the following specific policies required by WAC 136-50-050: `Has your agency sent the most recently adopted version to CRAB WAC 136-50-051? POLICY WAC DATE OF CURRENT VERSION Re: Organization 136-50-051 02/15/2018 Re: Personnel Practices 136-50-052 12/01/2013 Re: Complaint Handling 136-50-053 01/11/1999 Re: Work for Others 136-50-054 06/02/1998 Re: Utility Accommodation 136-50-055 03/30/2004 Re: Priority Programming 136-14-030 09/01/1998 F. The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner: DOCUMENT WAC DUE DATE DATE OF ADOPTION / DATE SENT TO PREPARATION CRAB '18 Six -Year Program 136-15-050 31 -DEC -17 09/19/2017 09/22/2017 '18 Annual Construction Program 136-16-040 31 -DEC -17 12/08/2017 12/16/2017 '18 CAPP Program 136-300-060 31 -DEC -17 12/27/2017 12/27/2017 '18 Road Fund Budget 31 -DEC -17 12/08/2017 12/18/2017 '18 Maintenance Management Work 136-11-040 31 -DEC -17 12/27/2017 12/29/2017 Plan & Budget '18 Road Levy 136-150-021 01 -FEB -18 12/08/2017 01/31/2018 '17 Certification of Road Fund Exp. 136-150-022 01 -APR -18 03/26/2018 03/30/2018 For Traffic Law Enforcement '17 Engineer's Certification of Fish 136-150-023 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 03/30/2018 Barrier Removal Costs '17 Certification of Road Fund Exp. 136-150-025 01 -APR -18 for Marine Navigation and Moorage '17 Annual Construction Report 136-16-050 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 03/30/2018 '17 CAPP Report 136-300-090 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 03/30/2018 '17 Maintenance Management 136-11-050 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 03/30/2018 Certification '17 Annual Certification 136-04-030 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 03/30/2018 '17 Road Log Update 136-60-030 01 -MAY -18 '18 PMS Certification for CAPA 136-70-070 31 -DEC -18 03/20/2018 03/30/2018 Eligibility https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019 C.A.R.S. Explanation: Kittitas county does not have expenses for Marine Navigation and Moorage. Page 2 of 2 G. Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2018 Yes Annual Program or as amended per WAC 136-16-042 - Attach Amendments. (If No, please attach a brief explanation.) H. The County's construction by county forces limit for 2018 computed in accordance with RCW 36.77.065: $1,267,683.75 The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2018 Annual Const. Report: $36,817.00 J. As required by WAC 136-20-060, a written Bridge and Inspection Report for 2018 was furnished to the legislative authority on (attach a copy): https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019 Kittitas County Reports for 2018 Digital Submittal Certification for Forms Due April 1st A The documents checked below are hereby submitted from Kittitas County for the review and acceptance of the County Road Administration Board. 2018 RAP Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Traffic Law Enforcement I hereby certify that the above report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Signed: _� C __ _ Date: f / 2c F j County Sheriff Signed: Date: 3�� I County ditor Signed— Date: 2>�h _ _ _ Chair I Executive ----------------------------------------------- 0 2018 Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Nj/P, jo 2018 Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Signed: Date: 2s Chain Executive ��� Signed: / ogr � L Date:-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coun En ineer 2018 Annual Construction Report V 2018 County Arterial Preservation Report V 2018 Maintenance Management Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Report, County Arterial Preservation Report, and Maintenance Management Certification are true and accurate and that I have reviewed, approved, and submitted said reports to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Signed: Date: - Coun- En ineer---------------------------- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO.: 2019- 0111 POSITION STATEMENT FROM KITTITAS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: "NO NET LOSS" FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ON PUBLIC ROADS WHEREAS: Public lands constitute nearly 71 percent of the total land area of Kittitas County; and WHEREAS: Kittitas County values the partnerships developed with all public land managers within the county; and WHEREAS: Public land managers requested a definition from the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners for "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads; and WHEREAS: Kittitas County Commissioners established the Kittitas County Public Lands Advisory Committee November 18, 2013 with the adoption of Resolution 2013- 134; and WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Public Lands Advisory Committee's By -Laws state, "Public lands are a vital community resource. The vision of the Public Lands Advisory Committee is to create cooperative relationships with public lands managers to ensure that public lands in Kittitas County provide access for the public and are sustainably managed for multiple uses while providing opportunities for outdoor recreation and economic benefit to County residents; and WHEREAS: On June 9, 2016 the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners Adopted Resolution 2016-076 approving a county recreation plan: The Kittitas County Park, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan wherein Policy 6.5.1 states, "Coordinate and support a comprehensive system of off-road 4 -wheel drive and all -terrain vehicle trails and backcountry roads that access scenic, environmental, historic, and open space attributes throughout Kittitas County expanding and linking existing trail systems in the urban and upper county areas into area -wide networks including the Wenatchee National Forest, Teanaway Community Forest, Naneum Ridge State Forest, LT Murray, Oak Creek, Wenas, Colockum, and Whiskey Dick Wildlife Areas; and WHEREAS: Kittitas County Board of Commissioners support "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads in Kittitas Count and across the State of Washington; and WHEREAS: The definition for "No Net Loss" was vetted through the Public Lands Advisory Committee with participation from public land manager; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of County Commissioners defines how the community achieves "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads as being: To achieve "No Net Loss" any established road or roads that are currently open which are permanently eliminated for the use of public travel by way of motorized transportation on public land or a public road should be replaced in the system by another road giving passage into the same geographical area. The following methods, appearing below, are used to achieve "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads. How to Mitigate for Road Closures (1) If the State or Federal Agency can demonstrate unequivocally why the permanent road closure is necessary and/or mandatory with no alternative to give passage into the same geographical area they can replace that road loss with a comparable road network by going through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected. This should aim to provide a road network that is equal to or superior to the original road as determined by public input. (2) When a State or Federal Agency purchases private land with existing roads they shall go through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected to assist in determining which roads shall remain open for public use by motorized transportation. In this process roads should aim to provide access to distinct geographic areas, scenic or interesting wildland experience, and lands that have a defined historical importance. DATED this 25th day of March, 2019 at Ellensburg, Washington. Attest: Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik Board- Mandy Buchholz 0C/NT,1WASN\c\\\\. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON ory Wright, Chairman ABSENT KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019 ACTION REQUESTED: Request to Approve a Resolution to Authorize Chair Signature on the Digital Submittal Certification to the County Road Administration Board BACKGROUND: Annually, the County Sheriff, County Auditor and the Board Chair are required to certify traffic law enforcement diversions from the Road Fund. The County Engineer is also required to sign certification documents. The Sheriff, Auditor and County Engineer have all signed. The Board Chair's signature is now needed completing the annual report. Annually, the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners and County Engineer are required to certify the following reports to the County Road Administration Board (CRAB): 2018 Annual Construction Report 2018 County Arterial Preservation Report 2018 Maintenance Management Annual Certification. The County Engineer has signed the required certification and the Chair is now required to sign the reporting document. INTERACTION: Public Works RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chair's signature on required annual Road Fund expenditure certification reporting (including the traffic law enforcement) to CRAB. HANDLING: Return one original to Public Works ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; County Road Diversion Supporting Documentation LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON THE DIGITAL SUBMITTAL CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD FOR 2018 ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES WHEREAS: The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires annual reporting of various Road Fund expenditures by the County Engineer; and WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor, County Engineer and the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners are required to annually certify Road Fund diversions supporting Traffic Law Enforcement (TLE) activities; and WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor and County Engineer have all signed the certification reporting $199,803.77 in 2018 Road Fund diversion; and WHEREAS: The County Engineer has signed the required reports and said reports are now ready for Chair signature; and WHEREAS: The Chair of the Board of County Commissioners signature is now required to complete 2018 County Road Administration Board (CRAB) reporting requirements; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's signature on the Digital Submittal Certification to the County Road Administration Board for 2018 Road Fund Expenditures. DATED this 25th day of March, 2019, at Ellensburg, Washington. Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik ❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cory Wright, Chairman Brett Wachsmith, Vice -Chairman Laura Osiadacz, Commissioner C.A.R.S. Kittitas County 2018 Page 1 of CERTIFICATION OF ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT WAC 136-150-022 Total Road Levy: Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $4,178,221.31 021): Actual Road Levy revenue produced: $4,174,140.17 Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Levv Diversion: Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $199,996.88 021): Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy: $199,803.77 Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and identifiable account (RCW 36.82.040): Yes Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Fund Expenditures: Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00 Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00 Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures: $199,803.77 Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS): $218,610.00 RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including traffic law enforcement, as are allowed by Article Il, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account. This form must be reviewed and certified (on the "Engineer's Certification Form") by: • County Sheriff County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer Chair, Board of County Commissioners OR County Executive hrtps://uww.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/201 C.A.R.S. Kiftitas County Annual Certification For Calendar Year 2018 WAC 136-04 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION A. During 2018 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified in RCW 36.80.030. B. At anytime during 2018 was there a vacancy/change in the position of County Engineer? If so, were the procedures in WAC 136-12 followed? Page 1 of: Yes Yes Explanation: County Engineer, Gregory L Huck resigned employment as of 4-1-2018. Board Resolution for Interim Acting County Engineer 2018-066 appointed Mark Cook, licensed professional engineer. C. The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2018 complied with WAC 136-28. Yes D. Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the arterial road Yes system in 2018 per WAC 136-14-020. E. As of December 31, 2018 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies set by the county legislative authority including, but not limited to, the following specific policies required by WAC 136-50-050: 'Has your agency sent the most recently adopted version to CRAB WAC 136-50-0517 POLICY WAC Re: Organization 136-50-051 Re: Personnel Practices 136-50-052 Re: Complaint Handling 136-50-053 Re: Work for Others 136-50-054 Re: Utility Accommodation 136-50-055 Re: Priority Programming 136-14-030 F. The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner: DATE OF CURRENT VERSION 02/15/2018 12/01/2013 01/11/1999 06/02/1998 03/30/2004 09/01/1998 DATE SENT TO CRAB 09/22/2017 12/16/2017 12/27/2017 12/18/2017 12/29/2017 01/31/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019 DOCUMENT WAC DUE DATE DATE OF ADOPTION I '18 Six -Year Program 136-15-050 31 -DEC -17 PREPARATION 09/19/2017 '18 Annual Construction Program 136-16-040 31 -DEC -17 12/08/2017 '18 CAPP Program 136-300-060 31 -DEC -17 12/27/2017 '18 Road Fund Budget 31 -DEC -17 12/08/2017 '18 Maintenance Management Work 136-11-040 31 -DEC -17 12/27/2017 Plan 8 Budget '18 Road Levy 136-150-021 01 -FEB -18 12/08/2017 '17 Certification of Road Fund Exp. 136-150-022 01 -APR -18 03/26/2018 For Traffic Law Enforcement '17 Engineer's Certification of Fish 136-150-023 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 Barrier Removal Costs '17 Certification of Road Fund Exp. 136-150-025 01 -APR -18 for Marine Navigation and Moorage '17 Annual Construction Report 136-16-050 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 '17 CAPP Report 136-300-090 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 '17 Maintenance Management 136-11-050 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 Certification '17 Annual Certification 136-04-030 01 -APR -18 03/20/2018 '17 Road Log Update 136-60-030 01 -MAY -18 '18 PMS Certification for CAPA 136-70-070 31 -DEC -18 03/20/2018 Eligibility DATE SENT TO CRAB 09/22/2017 12/16/2017 12/27/2017 12/18/2017 12/29/2017 01/31/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 03/30/2018 https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019 C.A.R.S. Explanation: Kittitas county does not have expenses for Marine Navigation and Moorage. Page 2 of G. Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2018 Yes Annual Program or as amended per WAC 136-16-042 - Attach Amendments. (If No, please attach a brief explanation.) H. The County's construction by county forces limit for 2018 computed in accordance with RCW 36.77.065: $1,267,683.75 The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2018 Annual Const. Report: $36,817.00 J. As required by WAC 136-20-060, a written Bridge and Inspection Report for 2018 was furnished to the legislative authority on (attach a copy): https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019 Kittitas County Reports for 2018 Digital Submittal Certification for Forms Due April 1st The documents checked below are hereby submitted from Kittitas County for the review and acceptance of the County Road Administration Board. tpti,2018 RAP Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Traffic Law Enforcement I hereby certify that the above report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. l Signed: i Date: -3,1412t I County Sheriff _ Signed: Chair I Executive __. _............................ Date: 2018 Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Nj/pp, jo 2018 Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Signed: Date: Chair/ Executive Signed: / iirg�L Date: 3'/ 1-/ / ------------------------------------------------ _ _ _ Coun En ineer ,4e 2018 Annual Construction Report 2018 County Arterial Preservation Report c9 2018 Maintenance Management Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Report, County Arterial Preservation Report, and Maintenance Management Certification are true and accurate and that I have reviewed, approved, and submitted said reports to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. j Signed: /' Date: __. CountY En'rneer.......-'-"-""'....................................................... KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019 ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Resolution Stating the Board's Position of "No Net Loss" for Access on Public Roads BACKGROUND: Since fall of 2018, the Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners has been working with the Public Lands Advisory Committee developing a definition and Board statement regarding no net loss for access on public roads. Recently, the Committee presented a final definition to the Board and final modifications have been made ready for formal Board acceptance. The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources have both been integral in developing the proposed final definition for: "No Net Loss". INTERACTION: Public Works RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution Stating the Board's position of "no net loss" for access on public roads. HANDLING: Return one original to Public Works ATTACHMENTS: Resolution LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO.: 2019 - POSITION STATEMENT FROM KITTITAS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: "NO NET LOSS" FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ON PUBLIC ROADS WHEREAS: Public lands constitute nearly 71 percent of the total land area of Kittitas County; and WHEREAS: Kittitas County values the partnerships developed with all public land managers within the county; and WHEREAS: Public land managers requested a definition from the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners for "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads; and WHEREAS: Kittitas County Commissioners established the Kittitas County Public Lands Advisory Committee November 18, 2013 with the adoption of Resolution 2013- 134; and WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Public Lands Advisory Committee's By -Laws state, "Public lands are a vital community resource. The vision of the Public Lands Advisory Committee is to create cooperative relationships with public lands managers to ensure that public lands in Kittitas County provide access for the public and are sustainably managed for multiple uses while providing opportunities for outdoor recreation and economic benefit to County residents; and WHEREAS: On June 9, 2016 the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners Adopted Resolution 2016-076 approving a county recreation plan: The Kittitas County Park. Recreation. and Open Space (PROS) Plan wherein Policy 6.5.1 states, "Coordinate and support a comprehensive system of off-road 4 -wheel drive and all -terrain vehicle trails and backcountry roads that access scenic, environmental, historic, and open space attributes throughout Kittitas County expanding and linking existing trail systems in the urban and upper county areas into area -wide networks including the Wenatchee National Forest, Teanaway Community Forest, Naneum Ridge State Forest, LT Murray, Oak Creek, Wenas, Colockum, and Whiskey Dick Wildlife Areas; and WHEREAS: Kittitas County Board of Commissioners support "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads in Kittitas Count and across the State of Washington; and WHEREAS: The definition for "No Net Loss" was vetted through the Public Lands Advisory Committee with participation from public land manager; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of County Commissioners defines how the community achieves "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads as being: To achieve "No Net Loss" any established road or roads that are currently open which are permanently eliminated for the use of public travel by way of motorized transportation on public land or a public road should be replaced in the system by another road giving passage into the same geographical area. The following methods, appearing below, are used to achieve "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads. How to Mitigate for Road Closures (1) If the State or Federal Agency can demonstrate unequivocally why the permanent road closure is necessary and/or mandatory with no alternative to give passage into the same geographical area they can replace that road loss with a comparable road network by going through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected. This should aim to provide a road network that is equal to or superior to the original road as determined by public input. (2) When a State or Federal Agency purchases private land with existing roads they shall go through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected to assist in determining which roads shall remain open for public use by motorized transportation. In this process roads should aim to provide access to distinct geographic areas, scenic or interesting wildland experience, and lands that have a defined historical importance. DATED this 25th day of March, 2019 at Ellensburg, Washington Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik ❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cory Wright, Chairman Brett Wachsmith, Vice -Chairman Laura Osiadacz, Commissioner KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019 TOPIC: Tax Parcel 693835 ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff Prepare Enabling Legislation Supporting Property Transfer to the City of Cie Elam, WA LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Direct that staff prepare enabling legislation supporting property transfer (tax parcel number 693835) to the City of Cie Elum, WA. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Public Works (PW) owns tax parcel no. 693835 in Cle Elum, WA • PW has no need for the parcel • The City of Cie Elum is interested in acquiring the parcel supporting a future dog park • 2019 market value for the parcel is $100. • RCW allows transfer for recreational purposes BACKGROUND: Earlier in March, Public Works (PW) noticed the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) of the City of Cie Elum's interest in PW tax parcel no. 693835. The parcel provides no benefit to Public Works and lists as having a land value of $100 in 2019 market value (EXHIBIT 1). PW pays $4.91 annually in property taxes. DISCUSSION: Revised Code of Washington provides for transfer of property for use for park and recreational purposes at RCW 39.33.060. Providing the City of Cie Elum writes the BOCC a letter stating their intention to create the dog park and request the transfer of tax parcel 4693835; PW will prepare enabling documents and docket for BOCC action. FISCAL IMPACTS: PW pays $4.91 annually for property valued at $100. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Kittitas County Taxsifter Information, TP# 693835 Exhibit 2: RCW 39.33.060 Page l of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 1: KITTITAS COUNTY TAXSIFTER INFORMATION, TP# 693835 Page 2 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT TerraSean TaxSifter - KITTITAS County Washington Page 1 of 2 KITTITAS COUNTY WASHINGTON TAXSIFTER SIMPLESEARCH SALE SEA H COU»�HgMEPAOE CONUA T DISCLAIMER NWMENTCARTM Mike Hougardy Kittitas County Assessor 205 W 5th Ave Ste 101 Ellensburg WA 98926 Assessor Treasurer Appraisal Mari Parcel Parcel#: 693835 Billed Owner Name: KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) Land DOR Code: 67 - Services - Governmental Total Add,assl: Taxable 2019 Situs: OAKES AVE CLE SLUM WORKS) Address2: 411 N RUBY ST STE 1 $0 Map Number: 20-15-26054-0101 $0 City, State: ELLENSBURG WA CO (PUBLIC Status: EXEMPT FULL YEAR $0 Zip: 98926-6300 $100 Description: CD. 4048-1; CLE ELUM, CONNELLS ADD.; LOTS 1 THRU 14; BLOCK I (ROAD) WORKS) Comment: $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 2019 Market Value 2019 Taxable Value 2019 Assessment Data $100 Land: $100 Land: $0 District: 28 - CICE SD404 H02 Improvements: $0 Improvements: $0 $0 CO COF ST Permanent Crop: $0 Permanent Crop: $0 Current Use/DFL: No Total $100 Total $0 Senior/Disability Exemption: No Total Acres: 0.00000 Ownership Owner's Name Ownership % KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) 100 % Saies History No Sales History Building Permits No Building Permits Available Historical Valuation Into Year Billed Owner Land Impr. PermCrop Value Total Exempt Taxable 2019 KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) $100 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 2018 KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) $100 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 2017 KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) $100 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 2016 KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) $100 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 2015 KrTTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) $100 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 VielLdD;rj Parcel Comments No Comments Ava liable Property Images No Images found. http://taxsi fter.co.kittitas. wa.uslAssessor.aspx?key ld=883227&parcelNumber=69383 5&ty... 3/20/2019 TerraScan TaxSifter - KITTITAS County Washington Page 1 of 2 KITTITAS COUNTY WASHINGTON TAXSIPTER SIMPLE SEARCH $ALES SEARCH COUNTY HOME PAGE C NTAC DISCLAIMER PAYMENT CART(01 AMY CZISKE Kittitas County Treasurer 205 W 5th AVE Suite 102 Ellensburg WA 98926 Assessor Treasurer Appraisal MapSifter Parcel Parcel#: 693835 Owner Name: KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) DOR Code: 67 - Services - Governmental Addressl: CO (PUBLIC WORKS) Situs: OAKES AVE CLE ELUM AddressZ: 411 N RUBY ST STE 1 Map Number: 20-15-26054-0101 City, State: ELLENSBURG WA Status: EXEMPT FULL YEAR Zip: 98926-6300 Description: Co. 4048-1; CLE ELUM, CONNELLS ADD.; LOTS 1 THRU 14; BLOCK 1 (ROAD) Comment: Fees Balance Due Real Property Current Tax Year Details Type Taxpayer Statement # Gross Tax Tax Exempt Net Tax Asmts Total Tax Real Property KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC 2019-693835 WORKS) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4.91 $4.91 Balances Due Type Taxpayer Statement # Tax Amount Interest Fees Due Balance(s) Due - Real Property KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) 2019-693835 $4.91 $0.00 $0.00 $4.91 ❑ ' Please expect a delay a 3-5 business days for your payment to Post. Note: Tire receipt date will reflect the Add Selected to Cisrt day the payment was Initiated. 5 Year Tax History Type Statement Number Taxes Assessments Fees Balance Due Real Property 2019-693835 $0.00 $4.91 $0.00 $4.91 Type Statement Number Taxes Assessments Fees Balance Due Real Property 20182018�3S $0.00 $4.91 $0.00 $0.00 Receipt Number Receipt Date Taxes/Fees Interest Paid Total Paid 2018-0750770 03/19/2018 $4.91 $0.00 $4.91 Type Statement Number Taxes Assessments Fees Balance Due Real Property 2017-693835 $0.00 $4.91 $0.00 $0.00 Receipt Number Receipt Date Taxes/Fees Interest Paid Total Paid 2017-0705653 04/24/2017 $4.91 $0.00 $4,91 Type Statement Number Taxes Assessments Fees Balance Due Real Property 20162016693-835 $0.00 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 Receipt Number Receipt Date Taxes/Fees Interest Paid Total Paid 2016-0634158 04/18/2016 $5.00 $0.00 $5.00 Type Statement Number Taxes Assessments Fees Balance Due Real Property 2015-693835 $0.00 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 http://taxsifter.co.kittitas.wa.usITreasurer.aspx?keyld=883227&pareelNumber=693835 &ty... 3/20/2019 TerraScan TaxSifter - KITTITAS County Washington Receipt Number Receipt Date Taxes/Fees 2015-0575545 04/27/2015 $5.00 Type Statement Number Taxes Assessments Real Property 2014-693833 $0.00 $5.00 Receipt Number Receipt Date Taxes/Fees 2014-0504660 04/07/2014 $5.00 Property Images No images found. 1,0.6927.19068 D.1a mnent.s aC 3/]9/3019 a:50 M Page 2 of 2 Interest Paid Total Paid $0.00 $5.00 Fees Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 Interest Paid Total Paid $0.00 $5.00 1%Pa11Y¢A �iP'. i01p http://taxsifter.co.kittitas.wa.usITreasurer.aspx?kcyld=883227&parcelNumber=693 835&ty... 3/20/2019 EXHIBIT 2: RCW39,33.060 Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Chapter 39.33 RCW: INTERGOVERNMENTAL DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY Page 4 of 5 Washington, or with any person, firm or corporation for public transportation services or for the use of all or any part of any publicly owned transportation facilities for such period and under such terms and conditions and upon such rentals, fees and charges as the legislative body operating such public transportation system may determine, and may pledge all or any portion of such rentals, fees and charges and all other revenue derived from the ownership or operation of publicly owned transportation facilities to pay and to secure the payment of general obligation bonds and/or revenue bonds of such municipality issued for the purpose of acquiring or constructing a public mass transportation system. [ 1969 ex.s. c 255 § 16.] NOTES: Construction -Severability -1969 ex.s. c 255: See notes following RCW 35.58.272. Public transportation systems: RCW 35.58.272 and 35.58.2721. 39.33.060 Transfer of property or contract for use for park and recreational purposes. Any governmental unit, as defined in RCW 36.93.020(1) as it now exists or is hereafter amended, may convey its real or personal property or any interest or right therein to, or contract for the use of such property by, the county or park and recreation district wherein such property is located for park or recreational purposes, by private negotiation and upon such terms and with such consideration as might be mutually agreed to by such governmental unit and the board of county commissioners or the park and recreation district board of commissioners. [ 1971 ex.s, c 243 § 7.1 39.33.070 School districts and libraries—Disposal of obsolete or surplus reading materials—Procedures. Any school district or educational service district, after complying with the requirements of RCW 28A.335.180, and any library, as defined in RCW 27.12.010, may dispose of surplus or obsolete books, periodicals, newspapers, and other reading materials as follows: (1) If the reading materials are estimated to have value as reading materials in excess of one thousand dollars, they shall be sold at public auction to the person submitting the You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http_11www.novapdf.com) !0/2019 KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019 TOPIC: 2019 Spring Flood Update ACTION REQUESTED: Informational Only LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Informational only — no action required. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Public Works (PW) recently met with area irrigators and the City of Ellensburg • Weather conditions have remained favorable (through 03-22-2019) • Freezing night temperatures have been favorable • PW is expecting localized flooding at Whiskey and Mercer BACKGROUND: On Tuesday (03-19-2019) PW maintenance management staff met with representatives from the City of Ellensburg and the three main irrigation districts (EWC, KCRD and Cascade). We reviewed current areas of concern and reviewed general known areas of lower County flooding. Reports are favorable from Upper County relative to the amount of snow and ice in main irrigation canals. DISCUSSION: Some amount of rain is expected this weekend. Concern is for daytime temperatures exceeding 50 degrees Fahrenheit coupled with over a quarter inch of rain. Soil conditions remain completely saturated and any amount of precipitation is expected to immediately runoff the landscape. Snow pack at upper elevations appear to be consolidating well (low water content) adding to confidence of a minimal flood event this spring. Local irrigation managers' report that that snow pack conditions represent approximately 80 percent of normal going into the runoff season. In conclusion, we have benefitted greatly from freezing conditions at night with relatively moderate daytime temperatures. This mix of temperature conditions is allowing a sustained orderly melt off of area snow pack with minimal impact to area streams. FISCAL IMPACTS: PW is budgeted for flood fight operations in the 2019 maintenance budget. Additional funding is available in the County's Flood Control Zone District 2019 budget. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019 TOPIC: Flood Alleviation at Bowers Field Airport (ELN) ACTION REQUESTED: informational Briefing—No Action Required LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Support the preferred flood alleviation alternative submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Public Works (PW) recently submitted a preferred flood alleviation proposal to the Federal Aviation Administration as part of ongoing Environmental Assessment work at Bowers Field (ELN) • Flood modeling suggests significant benefit to the airport and downstream property owners • The FAA will now be lobbied for including flood alleviation into the Capital Facility Plan BACKGROUND: PW's hydrology and hydraulics consultant (Watershed Science and Engineering) utilized the County's Whiskey and Mercer Creeks two dimensional flow model testing various flood alleviation options for ELN. The work is funded by the Environmental Assessment begin conducted in support of the Capital Improvement Plan. During recent years, flood flows have forced intermittent closures of runway 11-29. DISCUSSION: The following preferred actions are being presented to the FAA as an Appendix to the EA (EXHIBIT 1): • Extend/cleanout the taxiway ditch to the north end of runway 11-29 • Construct an east -west ditch along abandoned taxiway at north end of runway 11- 29 to capture and route overland flow away from Bowers Field and towards Whiskey Creek to prevent flooding across runways Page 1 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT • Construct storage ponds at west end of Bowers Field to detain flow from the new east -west ditch and allow controlled release to Whiskev Creek. Size culverts at the pond outlet to restrict outflow to Whiskey Creek and prevent any increase to peak flooding downstream. Construct storage ponds to the west of Whiskey Creek on Kittitas County property upstream of Hungry Junction Road. Size ponds and outlet structures to attenuate peak flow on Whiskey Creek and to work in conjunction with storage ponds west of Bowers Field to avoid downstream flood impacts on Whiskey Creek. The actions listed above are expected to alleviate flooding across runway 11-29 and reduce shallow flooding on the western edge of the airport property. New and expanded ditches route overland flow away from both airport facilities and downstream properties between Whiskey and Mercer Creeks. The flood storage ponds provide enough live storage to prevent routed flow from increasing peak flood depths downstream while still draining within 12 hours of the flood peak to meet FAA requirements for surface impoundment. The complete technical memorandum from WSE is attached as EXHIBIT 1 for Board review. Actual implementation of the storage proposal will entail significant additional engineering and is expected to require additional funding. FISCAL IMPACTS: The cost of implementing the various preferred alternatives is currently being developed Once costs are in hand, PW will approach the FAA requesting funding for constructing the identified preferred alternatives. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: WSE Bowers Field EA Flood Reduction Alternatives Analysis Page 2 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 1: WSE BOWERS FIELD EA FLOOD REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT KMT'07AS COUH?b AoEaPOR7 913111 *3 Bowers Field EA Flood Reduction Alternatives Analysis %FWEST CENTURY � i � r :J n .:. � � � n.,.:. i , . 29 �A' .. � ,.. yr*` WATERSHED Memorandum To: Kurt Addicott, PE, Century West Engineering From: Colin Butler, EIT & Chris Frei, PE, Watershed Science & Engineering Date: March 12, 2019 Re: DRAFT— Bowers Field EA Flood Reduction Alternatives Analysis INTRODUCTION Watershed Science & Engineering (WSE) completed hydraulic modeling and analysis to support the design of planned improvements at Bowers Field airport near Ellensburg, WA (see Figure 1). The airport is located within the 100 -year floodplain of both Whiskey and Mercer Creeks, and planned airport improvements have the potential to impact flood hazards on and downstream of the airport property. WSE updated an existing HEC -RAS 2D hydraulic model of Whiskey and Mercer Creeks to evaluate several alternatives for reducing flood risk to airport facilities without negatively impacting downstream properties. Results from this analysis will support the Bowers Field Environmental Assessment (EA) being prepared by Century West Engineering (Century West). BACKGROUND The Bowers Field EA currently being prepared by Century West is based on planned implementation of the 2018-2023 portion of the Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Capital Improvement Program. Short term projects covered under the EA include rehabilitation of runway 7-25, runway 11-29, runway 11-29 parallel taxiway, and AC hold areas, in addition to other site grading, pavement removal, and taxiway development. WSE was contracted by Century West to complete a hydraulic analysis for selecting a preferred set of actions to reduce or eliminate problematic flooding at the airport and to demonstrate that proposed actions covered by the EA will not worsen 100 -year flood conditions downstream from the airport. Problematic flooding on the airport runway under existing conditions is the result of overland flow escaping Mercer Creek northeast of the airport both upstream and downstream of Hungry Junction Road. Most of this flow concentrates in a taxiway ditch parallel to runway 11-29 before ponding and flowing across the runway near the intersection of runway 11-29 and runway 7-25. Flow overtopping the runways ultimately impacts airport facilities and private property downstream of the runway intersection. HYDRAULIC MODELING WSE completed hydraulic modeling based on an existing unsteady HEC -RAS 2D hydraulic model of Whiskey and Mercer Creeks that was constructed fora study to update FEMA flood maps in Kittitas County (WSE, 2018). The model was modified to run in the latest version of HEC -RAS (version 5.0.6). Peak flow hydrology for Whiskey and Mercer Creeks was developed previously for the 2018 FEMA mapping study (WSE, 2018). 24-hour inflow hydrographs applied to the model simulate a rain -on -snow event representing typical historical flooding in the region. Table 1 lists 2-, 10-, and 100 -year annual V"A I E F:S H i U,!(I, I':{F&ENGI"E E RI NI BOG.: ' ,, Suit« i cll;'r .illi ":/,9 iCi ""-1, 1 -W'00 instantaneous peak flows along Whiskey and Mercer Creeks upstream and downstream of the airport property. Approximately 67 cfs is currently simulated to overtop the airport runway under existing conditions during the peak of the 100 -year event. Table 1. Annual Instantaneous Peak Discharges for Whiskey and Mercer Creek Near Bowers Field r OdK nuw m Bno near main creeK cnannei ExISTING CONDITION MODEL The model was updated to represent existing site conditions by incorporating recent topographic survey from Century West of the two airport runways and adjacent areas into the model terrain. The existing condition model was then run to simulate the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year flood events'. Figure 2 shows 100 - year model results indicating significant overland flow across Bowers Field and over runway 11-29. The updated existing condition model provides a baseline for the alternatives analysis and evaluation of project impacts. WITH -PROJECT MODEL A with -project model was developed to represent planned changes to the airport grading. These changes include modifications to runway and taxiway extents and resurfacing that will be completed independent of flood reduction measures. The with -project model was developed by merging a with -project terrain surface (provided by Century West) with the existing condition model terrain. 1 2- and 10 -year flood simulation results are shown in Appendix A. 2- and 10 -year flooding would be primarily contained in. channel or captured within existing airport drainage features. The 100 -year flood was therefore the focus of the alternatives analysis. WATERSHED I' f• 12 Annual Instantaneous Peak Discharge° (cfs) Return Interval Whiskey Creek Mercer Creek (Years) Upstream Airport Downstream Airport Upstream Airport Downstream Airport On Airport Above Hungry Junction Road Below Bowers Road Above Hungry Junction Road Below Bowers Road Across Runway Intersection 2 81.7 84.1 14.8 19.4 0.0 10 160.4 186.4 77.6 89.3 0.0 100 524.4 733.0 293.3 333.1 66.8 r OdK nuw m Bno near main creeK cnannei ExISTING CONDITION MODEL The model was updated to represent existing site conditions by incorporating recent topographic survey from Century West of the two airport runways and adjacent areas into the model terrain. The existing condition model was then run to simulate the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year flood events'. Figure 2 shows 100 - year model results indicating significant overland flow across Bowers Field and over runway 11-29. The updated existing condition model provides a baseline for the alternatives analysis and evaluation of project impacts. WITH -PROJECT MODEL A with -project model was developed to represent planned changes to the airport grading. These changes include modifications to runway and taxiway extents and resurfacing that will be completed independent of flood reduction measures. The with -project model was developed by merging a with -project terrain surface (provided by Century West) with the existing condition model terrain. 1 2- and 10 -year flood simulation results are shown in Appendix A. 2- and 10 -year flooding would be primarily contained in. channel or captured within existing airport drainage features. The 100 -year flood was therefore the focus of the alternatives analysis. WATERSHED I' f• 12 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The with -project model surface was then modified to evaluate alternatives for flood reduction at Bowers Field and mitigation of flood impacts to downstream properties. The following alternatives were identified through discussion between WSE, Century West, and Kittitas County, and the analysis and results for each evaluated alternative are discussed in the sections below: Increasing in -channel flow conveyance of Mercer Creek by modifying the channel banks and/or replacing the culvert under Hungry Junction Road • Construction or modification of drainage ditches to capture and route flow around the airport • Construction of flood storage (in combination with modifications to drainage ditches) INCREASED IN -CHANNEL CONVEYANCE OF MERCER CREEK -BANK MODIFICATION Flow escaping the Mercer Creek channel downstream of Hungry Junction Road contributes to overbank flooding of airport facilities. Actions considered to increase channel capacity and reduce overtopping included raising the channel bank at a channel bend on airport property downstream of Hungry Junction Road. WSE updated the with -project model geometry to represent multiple potential bank configurations and ran the model to simulate the 100 -year flood event. An example of the resulting change in 100 -year flood depth from raising the channel bank (compared to existing conditions) is shown in Figure 3. For any one of the configurations tested, raising the channel bank reduced peak flooding at the airport but retained more flow within the Mercer Creek channel, leading to increased flood depths along Mercer Creek downstream from the airport. No feasible measures were identified to mitigate these impacts. INCREASED IN -CHANNEL CONVEYANCE OF MERCER CREEK -HUNGRY JUNCTION CULVERT REPLACEMENT The Mercer Creek culvert under Hungry Junction Road is undersized and contributes to backwatering and road overtopping that floods the north end of Bowers Field and the airport runways. WSE updated the with -project model to simulate replacing the existing 4 -ft corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culvert with a larger structure and ran the model to simulate the 100 -year flood event. An example of the resulting change in 100 -year flood depth from a combination of the upsized culvert and raised channel bank (compared to existing conditions) is shown in Figure 4. Results indicate reduced road overtopping along Hungry Junction Road and reduced peak flooding at the airport. However, more flow within the Mercer Creek channel led to increased peak flood depths along Mercer Creek downstream from the airport. No feasible measures were identified to mitigate these impacts. DITCH MODIFICATION OR CONSTRUCTION The following alternative ditch locations and alignments were evaluated: Clean out the existing taxiway ditch along the east side of runway 11-29 to capture and route flooding from the airport runways downstream to Mercer Creek WATERSHED T- r p 3 Construct a new ditch from east to west along an abandoned taxiway between runway 11-29 and Hungry Junction Road to capture water overtopping Hungry Junction Road and route it west toward Whiskey Creek • Extend the constructed east -west ditch (described above) south along the west side of the airport to activate flood storage within an existing depression on airport property WSE updated the with -project model geometry to represent each of these alternatives, including variations on ditch length, size, and outlet location. Results indicate a reduction in flooding at airport infrastructure but significantly increased flood depths at and downstream of each of the ditch outlets. Ditch options were therefore considered in combination with flood storage (see next section) to reduce peak outflow and eliminate downstream impacts. FLOOD STORAGE CONSTRUCTION Multiple flood storage configurations were evaluated in conjunction with drainage ditch construction to reduce peak flows and mitigate downstream impacts from routing flooding away from airport facilities. Storage alternatives were simulated by adding multiple low -height berms in series to maximize storage within the steeply sloping terrain and to reduce the required height of each berm. Each storage area was modeled with a low-level culvert outlet to meter outflow and allow stored water to drain during the flood recession. Three storage configurations were examined: 1. Storage ponds at the northwest corner of Bowers Field, fed by a constructed east -west ditch (described above). Water would be released Whiskey Creek through a culvert outlet. Storage ponds at the southwest corner of Bowers Field (an alternative to the first configuration) covering a natural depression in this area that would provide additional storage volume. Water would be released to Whiskey Creek through a culvert outlet. 3. Storage ponds to the west of Whiskey Creek and north of Hungry Junction Road. These ponds would be located away from the airport on property owned by Kittitas County. Berm layouts for each storage configuration were determined through an iterative process to achieve adequate flood storage. Berms were simulated by creating vertical walls on top of the existing model terrain without any changes to the surrounding terrain surface. Equivalent storage volume could also be achieved through a combination of shorter berms paired with excavation of the area upstream. Pond outlets (culverts) were sized to maximize storage volume during the flood peak while allowing for adequate drainage during the flood recession. Final configuration results showed that storage alternatives 1 and 3 were effective at reducing 100 -year peak flows and mitigating downstream impacts of flow routed through the ditches. However, storage alternative 2 resulted in increased downstream flood depths that could not be mitigated due to the location of the drainage outlet. Figure 5 shows the change in 100 -year flood depth (compared to existing conditions) resulting from storage alternative 2 in conjunction with the Mercer Creek bank -raising measure described above, indicating a significant increase in downstream flood depths downstream of the storage outlet. �=WATERSHED F [; e a Additional locations for flood storage were considered, including areas northeast, east, and southeast of the airport runways. These options were eliminated due to limitations caused by terrain features, slope, and available area; therefore, no hydraulic analysis of these options was completed. PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WSE presented results of alternative model simulations to the County and Century West during online meetings on 1/15/19 and 2/4/19. At the 2/4/19 meeting, the team selected a preferred alternative consisting of the following combination of measures to reduce flooding to airport facilities and mitigate downstream impacts (see Figure 6 diagram): • Extend/cleanout the taxiway ditch to the north end of runway 11-29 • Construct an east -west ditch along abandoned taxiway at north end of runway 11-29 to capture and route overland flow away from Bowers Field and towards Whiskey Creek to prevent flooding across runways • Construct storage ponds at west end of Bowers Field to detain flow from the new east -west ditch and allow controlled release to Whiskey Creek. Size culverts at the pond outlet to restrict outflow to Whiskey Creek and prevent any increase to peak flooding downstream. • Construct storage ponds to the west of Whiskey Creek on Kittitas County property upstream of Hungry Junction Road. Size ponds and outlet structures to attenuate peak flow on Whiskey Creek and to work in conjunction with storage ponds west of Bowers Field to avoid downstream flood impacts on Whiskey Creek. The taxiway ditch cleanout extends approximately 1700 additional feet parallel to the runway from the existing cleanout, and the constructed east -west ditch extends approximately 2800 feet from the access road at the north end of Bowers Field to the abandoned taxiways at the west end of the airport property. Constructed storage ponds consist of berms ranging from a maximum of 4 to 7 feet and 600 to 1000 feet long with aft x 3ft to 8ft x Sft rectangular outlets. The five storage ponds on Bowers Field provide a peak storage volume of approximately 21 acre-feet during the 100 -year flood event. The four storage ponds upstream of the airport provide a total peak storage volume of approximately 12 acre- feet during the 100 -year flood event. Resulting 100 -year flood depths and change in depth from the preferred alternative are shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. In general, the preferred alternative routes flow around the airport through a combination of ditches and storage, eliminating flooding across the airport runways and downstream properties between Whiskey and Mercer Creeks. The storage ponds fill to maximum capacity during the flood peak, then drain completely within 12 hours. Figure 8 indicates that there are some changes in flood depth outside of the constructed ditches and storage ponds, although all of these impacts are very minor (less than 0.1 ft change in depth) and are generally contained on County property. WATERSHED P a k> P 15 CONCLUSION Bowers Field airport currently experiences problematic flooding across its runways during the 100 -year flood event on Whiskey and Mercer Creeks, prompting a hydraulic analysis to asses flood reduction measures. The preferred alternative determined by this analysis includes a combination of actions that alleviate flooding across runway 11-29 and reduce shallow flooding on the western edge of the airport property. New and expanded ditches route overland flow away from both airport facilities and downstream properties between Whiskey and Mercer Creeks. The flood storage ponds provide enough live storage to prevent routed flow from increasing peak flood depths downstream while still draining within 12 hours of the flood peak to meet FAA requirements for surface impoundment. REFERENCES WSE (2018), "Whiskey and Mercer Creek Hydraulic Modeling and Analysis" Memorandum to Mark Cook, Kittitas County Public Works. Watershed Science and Engineering, Seattle, WA, March 29, 2018. WATERSHED l; 6 1I- lagantl � eg WnieMey 6 Me�re� UeeM G /an.>e.aroen aovair awooe�r I I— —_ \\ifI ' II l ��. vo 1 I R-wer]35 1 7 \ 9 ! \ McFerCrtet t f wenw corp. wn � Bowan Field EA ®W. Project Locagon Map DRAFT Flgure 1 lagantl � eg WnieMey 6 Me�re� UeeM G /an.>e.aroen aovair awooe�r I I— —_ \\ifI ' II l ��. vo 1 I R-wer]35 1 7 \ 9 ! \ McFerCrtet t f wenw corp. wn � Bowan Field EA ®W. Project Locagon Map DRAFT Flgure 1 amm co��n. w� ( Dept ®... 100year Flood Depth 00-yeng Flood 7"gend,gConditins .11 jal.F, DRAFT Figure 2 ..m. cw�y. wA Example Akernative ®... ' Relae Mercer Bank 100year Charge In Depth „n., � wArrasRao =.ntl 100 -year R.I. Marcor Bank Chrnae in OWh lel -� 2,0- .0 --20-10 RameMuur Wnk -10-05 W-05 —42 0.0.14 _a01 - .1.oz, (&,m �•� =0,01 ow 0 4.i -as �iJ 42-4s a ®4S 10 �1.0-00 >20 t ( RMuu Aapon Fnctivp F 1 i — s E r r q Innwve Mttcer Creek Flrcd!q . ~ f 4N - i ..m. cw�y. wA Example Akernative ®... ' Relae Mercer Bank 100year Charge In Depth „n., � wArrasRao DRAFT Figure 3 DRAFT Figure 4 WA Example Alternative j. Rabe Bank-Upsize Culvert .®rte, 100-year Change In Depth u.p• ♦ W1rFYSXf D Legend u�u na-wr �e�nX,� c�wen 100-year Re ise Meme r Bank B Upslee Calvert pmuce o.niognieane WeX eoxsn Gimevq.. Change in Depth (n) ; r •; `-z.0 } -� �n.0-.0a gene vem�0enx' ® .05--02 o.e -o.i .0 -om L_] n. g.m lannry 001 0.10 D oi.0z W102 D5 os- 1.0 Wtn.z0 �.eo Enminaro 4raen Froaary y •. � .�•.! \ � GUNer lnmeN MN[N C.N4nm0vg . ' � g DRAFT Figure 4 wxur cm.,n. wn Example Alternative S Storage - Raise Hank 7D0 -year Change In Depth Legend 700 -year South Storage & Raise Mercer Bank Ctunga In oast, IPo M. 20 =-a.o.-r.o �I -1.0 -05 0.5- 02 =x2..01 `I .a m -.o of n-001 ieimq I—� 00r -0.m .—jai.oi C_10i-0.5 W 05 1.0 W to a.o W,zo «ea<N<rp(ea�k 811JM1y , a \\ r i� \Y Corcnunl5nut. StogOe Pa�ub ,a '-\ wn dEovuero FcelE EIIIMNIfMrrpl Flpp}e NCr<FW Fb(aillp <EigXel loWM4e<CreN 1 t b Inuesae Morar Clee<FioeO<p .. DRAFT Figure 5 DRAFT Figure 6 YhYr LaIMy Wm s �••- ' w...r,,� WmrfaSnfD i- Preferred Attematiw ®F.. t Diagram of Measure LBpllld Wea: M WTMry CF 6�arepe Berme — lMlakey 6 Mslx Crteks — 6buBe Berms ��— NerT Bewxs� 1� N Iv' Wee10PMiefgq S:erps proms l� cPe� zM f 1 i d 1e t t uau� creek i F DRAFT Figure 6 s �••- ' w...r,,� WmrfaSnfD DRAFT Figure 6 J I � Legend i 1 rt� 100-year Preferred AlternativeDepth (n) iFftp Ne Lounp, WR Preferred Alternative ®�... 700-year Flood DRAFT Figure 7 Depth a �r � W�rFBe{e J I � Legend i 1 rt� 100-year Preferred AlternativeDepth (n) iFftp Ne Lounp, WR Preferred Alternative ®�... 700-year Flood DRAFT Figure 7 DRAFT Figure 8 wP ®.+ Pear Alternative t 7M 100 -year Change in Deplh �•-.. a• 4 w.rras.r0 ewlu,�a wem or w�.wer c,eer. Legend sa,ye ae,m. 700 -War Pralamd AlUmative �•,- 1; r cwm,a Easuwen oxm Change In naPth Otl ,' , � -..zo -2n—to IN -0.5 02 02--o.+ E..te o+o -0m tao�o iorcn 01 Iffl-k) aeu it _7a.m =0,1 02 jw oz -os �. eonswe�w.si Ee�•F.b a5 l.o `` lo,ade Perms 10 20 >zo \• •_ .- EhoInpePwpm�pbcpra _ _ - EMMie DmnRlTam Flppp lmyy,e Emnirele pawmrceam FbW MpeK .� 1 DRAFT Figure 8 DRAFT Appendix Al Existing Conditions 3 -year Flood Depth ) _ n � FUtPfwfO I LegerM Iyear Ezlfting Csnditbns i Depth lft) f IJ DRAFT Appendix Al DRAFT Appendix A2 TCeuMI. W/. I Existing conditions =� I -year Flood Depth 9n f T^� N,rkPSMID y r // 10.ysar ExleWg CDntllllons �� l Non Pa A � dAKL`�Nti i 66I i DRAFT Appendix A2