HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-03-25-minutes-public-works-study-sessionKITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Public Works Study Session
Regular Meeting
Monday March 25, 2019 - 1:30 PM
Commissioners' Auditorium
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
1. Call to Order
2. Request to Approve a Resolution to Authorize the Chair's Signature on the Digital Submittal
Certification to the County Road Administration Board
3. Request to Approve a Resolution Stating the Board of County Commissioners' Position of
"No Net Loss" for Access on Public Roads
4. Property Transfer of Tax Parcel 693835 - City of Cie Elum Discussion
5. 2019 Spring Flood Update
6. Flood Alleviation at Bowers Field
7. Other business
8. Adjourn
Created on 3/21/2019 9:31:03 AM
KITTITAS COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION MINUTES
COMMISSIONERS' AUDITORIUM, 205 WEST 5TH ROOM 109 -
Regular Meeting
MONDAY 1:30 PM MARCH 25, 2019
Board members present: Chairman Cory Wright; Commissioner Laura
Osiadacz
Others: Mark Cook, Candie Leader, Public Works; Dan Carlson, Dusty
Pilkington, Mike Flory, Community Development Services
At 1:58 pm Chairman Cory Wright opened the Public Works Study Session.
REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON
THE DIGITAL SUBMITTAL CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION
BOARD
Mark Cook presented the resolution for approval and stated that this
is an annual certification that is submitted to the County Road
Administration Board for reporting purposes. Commissioner Laura
Osiadacz made a motion to approve Resolution 2019-060 Authorizing the
Chair's Signature on the Digital Submittal Certification to the County
Road Administration Board. Chairman Cory Wright seconded the motion.
Motion passed 2-0.
REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION STATING THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS' POSITION OF "NO NET LOSS" FOR ACCESS ON PUBLIC ROADS
Mark Cook stated that the Board of County Commissioners has been
working with the Public Lands Advisory Committee and other
stakeholders regarding access on public roads. Mark Cook continued
that Public Works finalized the resolution for approval. Chairman
Cory Wright expressed his thanks to Commissioner Laura Osiadacz for
her efforts on this and Mark Cook added that Chairman Cory Wright was
also passionate on this issue. Commissioner Laura Osiadacz stated
that she also appreciates all the work that has been done from staff
and stakeholders. Chairman Cory Wright made a motion to approve
Resolution 2019-061 Stating the Board of County Commissioners'
Position of "No Net Loss" for Access on Public Roads. Commissioner
Laura Osiadacz seconded the motion with said motion passing 2-0.
PROPERTY TRANSFER OF TAX PARCEL 693835 - CITY OF CLE ELUM DISCUSSION
Mark Cook stated at a previous study session he spoke to the Board
about the City of Cle Elum requesting to acquire Tax Parcel 693835 for
a potential dog park. Mark Cook continued that at that study session
the Board requested staff research the value of the tax parcel. Mark
Cook added that the market value for the parcel is one hundred dollars
2019-03-25 MINUTES
($100) and Public Works pays four dollars and ninety-one cents ($4.91)
annually in property taxes. Mark Cook commented that under RCW
39.33.060 property can be transferred for park and recreational uses.
Mark Cook stated that the City of Cle Elum would need to formally
request a letter to the Board stating the intention of creating the
dog park and request the transfer of the tax parcel. Mark Cook added
that he will have the Prosecuting Attorney's office verify the RCW
mentioned is valid and bring back to the Board. Staff was directed to
move forward with the process and have legal confirm that RCW
39.33.060 is appropriate to transfer the tax parcel.
2019 SPRING FLOOD UPDATE
Mark Cook reported that last week he and staff attended a meeting with
area irrigators and the City of Ellensburg to discuss potential
flooding and some areas of concern. Mark Cook continued that at the
time of the meeting the weekend forecast was predicting flooding,
however, none was reported. Mark Cook added that he did meet onsite
with DR Horton and Ellensburg Water Company at Blackhorse to discuss
the light flooding there.
FLOOD ALLEVIATION AT BOWERS FIELD
Mark Cook stated that for the past two and a half (2.5) years staff
has been working on flooding models for Bowers Field and surrounding
areas. Mark Cook continued that the Flood Control Zone District had
also participated in some work ahead of the Environmental Assessment
and with some trial and error found alternatives to relieve the runway
flooding. Mark Cook added that the path forward to explain to the
Federal Aviation Administration the significance of the alternatives
and request some funding to help with the engineering that will need
to be completed. Discussion was held.
Meeting adjourned at 2:14 pm.
2019-03-25 MINUTES
KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Cory Wright, Chairman
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - M
AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON THE DIGITAL SUBMITTAL
CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD FOR 2018
ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES
WHEREAS: The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires annual reporting of
various Road Fund expenditures by the County Engineer; and
WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor, County Engineer and the Chair of the Board
of County Commissioners are required to annually certify Road Fund diversions
supporting Traffic Law Enforcement (TLE) activities; and
WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor and County Engineer have all signed the
certification reporting $199,803.77 in 2018 Road Fund diversion; and
WHEREAS: The County Engineer has signed the required reports and said reports are now
ready for Chair signature; and
WHEREAS: The Chair of the Board of County Commissioners signature is now required to
complete 2018 County Road Administration Board (CRAB) reporting
requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the
best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's signature on the Digital Submittal
Certification to the County Road Administration Board for 2018 Road Fund Expenditures.
DATED this 25th day of March, 2019, at Ellensburg, Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik
, 1,,,,0,R0ttAts/Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz
J
per, `• _r..1�.�-�L7��1�1
_F•. � L;.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Cory Wri t, Chairman
ABSENT
Brett Wachsmith, Vice -Chairman
Lura Os
Corj>i4ssioner
C.A.R.S
Kittitas County 2018
CERTIFICATION OF ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT
WAC 136-150-022
Page 1 of 1
Total Road Levy:
Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $4,178,221.31
021):
Actual Road Levy revenue produced: $4,174,140.17
Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Levv Diversion
Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $199,996.88
021):
Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy: $199,803.77
Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and identifiable account (RCW 36.82.040): Yes
Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Fund Expenditures:
Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00
Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00
Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures: $199,803.77
Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS): $218,610.00
RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all
revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including traffic law enforcement, as are allowed
by Article ll, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural
Arterial Trust Account.
This form must be reviewed and certified (on the "Engineer's Certification Form") by:
• County Sheriff
• County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer
• Chair, Board of County Commissioners OR County Executive
https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019
C.A.R.S.
Kittitas County Annual Certification For Calendar Year 2018
WAC 136-04
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
A. During 2018 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified in RCW
36.80.030.
B. At any time during 2018 was there a vacancy/change in the position of County Engineer? If so, were the
procedures in WAC 136-12 followed?
Page 1 of 2
Explanation:
County Engineer, Gregory L Huck resigned employment as of 4-1-2018. Board Resolution for Interim Acting County Engineer
2018-066 appointed Mark Cook, licensed professional engineer.
Yes
Yes
C. The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2018 complied with WAC 136-28. Yes
D. Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the arterial road Yes
system in 2018 per WAC 136-14-020.
E. As of December 31, 2018 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies set by the county
legislative authority including, but not limited to, the following specific policies required by WAC 136-50-050:
`Has your agency sent the most recently adopted version to CRAB WAC 136-50-051?
POLICY
WAC
DATE OF CURRENT VERSION
Re:
Organization
136-50-051
02/15/2018
Re:
Personnel Practices
136-50-052
12/01/2013
Re:
Complaint Handling
136-50-053
01/11/1999
Re:
Work for Others
136-50-054
06/02/1998
Re:
Utility Accommodation
136-50-055
03/30/2004
Re:
Priority Programming
136-14-030
09/01/1998
F. The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner:
DOCUMENT
WAC
DUE DATE
DATE OF ADOPTION /
DATE SENT TO
PREPARATION
CRAB
'18
Six -Year Program
136-15-050
31 -DEC -17
09/19/2017
09/22/2017
'18
Annual Construction Program
136-16-040
31 -DEC -17
12/08/2017
12/16/2017
'18
CAPP Program
136-300-060
31 -DEC -17
12/27/2017
12/27/2017
'18
Road Fund Budget
31 -DEC -17
12/08/2017
12/18/2017
'18
Maintenance Management Work
136-11-040
31 -DEC -17
12/27/2017
12/29/2017
Plan & Budget
'18
Road Levy
136-150-021
01 -FEB -18
12/08/2017
01/31/2018
'17
Certification of Road Fund Exp.
136-150-022
01 -APR -18
03/26/2018
03/30/2018
For Traffic Law Enforcement
'17
Engineer's Certification of Fish
136-150-023
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
03/30/2018
Barrier Removal Costs
'17
Certification of Road Fund Exp.
136-150-025
01 -APR -18
for Marine Navigation and
Moorage
'17
Annual Construction Report
136-16-050
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
03/30/2018
'17
CAPP Report
136-300-090
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
03/30/2018
'17
Maintenance Management
136-11-050
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
03/30/2018
Certification
'17
Annual Certification
136-04-030
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
03/30/2018
'17
Road Log Update
136-60-030
01 -MAY -18
'18
PMS Certification for CAPA
136-70-070
31 -DEC -18
03/20/2018
03/30/2018
Eligibility
https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/
3/14/2019
C.A.R.S.
Explanation:
Kittitas county does not have expenses for Marine Navigation and Moorage.
Page 2 of 2
G. Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2018 Yes
Annual Program or as amended per WAC 136-16-042 - Attach Amendments. (If No, please attach a
brief explanation.)
H. The County's construction by county forces limit for 2018 computed in accordance with RCW 36.77.065: $1,267,683.75
The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2018 Annual Const. Report: $36,817.00
J. As required by WAC 136-20-060, a written Bridge and Inspection Report for 2018 was furnished to the
legislative authority on (attach a copy):
https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019
Kittitas County
Reports for 2018
Digital Submittal Certification
for Forms Due April 1st
A
The documents checked below are hereby submitted from Kittitas County for the review and acceptance of the County Road
Administration Board.
2018 RAP Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Traffic
Law Enforcement
I hereby certify that the above report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for
submission to the County Road Administration Board
in accordance with WAC 136.
Signed: _� C __ _
Date: f / 2c F j
County Sheriff
Signed:
Date: 3�� I
County ditor
Signed—
Date: 2>�h
_ _ _ Chair I Executive
-----------------------------------------------
0 2018 Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage
Barrier Removal Nj/P,
jo 2018 Annual Certification
I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have
reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC
136.
Signed: Date: 2s
Chain Executive
���
Signed: / ogr � L Date:--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coun En ineer
2018 Annual Construction Report
V 2018 County Arterial Preservation Report
V 2018 Maintenance Management Annual Certification
I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Report, County Arterial Preservation Report, and Maintenance
Management Certification are true and accurate and that I have reviewed, approved, and submitted said reports to
the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136.
Signed: Date:
- Coun- En ineer----------------------------
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION
NO.: 2019- 0111
POSITION STATEMENT FROM KITTITAS COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS: "NO NET LOSS" FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ON PUBLIC ROADS
WHEREAS: Public lands constitute nearly 71 percent of the total land area of Kittitas County;
and
WHEREAS: Kittitas County values the partnerships developed with all public land managers
within the county; and
WHEREAS: Public land managers requested a definition from the Kittitas County Board of
Commissioners for "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads; and
WHEREAS: Kittitas County Commissioners established the Kittitas County Public Lands
Advisory Committee November 18, 2013 with the adoption of Resolution 2013-
134; and
WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Public Lands Advisory Committee's By -Laws state, "Public
lands are a vital community resource. The vision of the Public Lands Advisory
Committee is to create cooperative relationships with public lands managers to
ensure that public lands in Kittitas County provide access for the public and are
sustainably managed for multiple uses while providing opportunities for outdoor
recreation and economic benefit to County residents; and
WHEREAS: On June 9, 2016 the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners Adopted Resolution
2016-076 approving a county recreation plan: The Kittitas County Park,
Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan wherein Policy 6.5.1 states,
"Coordinate and support a comprehensive system of off-road 4 -wheel drive and
all -terrain vehicle trails and backcountry roads that access scenic, environmental,
historic, and open space attributes throughout Kittitas County expanding and
linking existing trail systems in the urban and upper county areas into area -wide
networks including the Wenatchee National Forest, Teanaway Community Forest,
Naneum Ridge State Forest, LT Murray, Oak Creek, Wenas, Colockum, and
Whiskey Dick Wildlife Areas; and
WHEREAS: Kittitas County Board of Commissioners support "No Net Loss" for public access
on public roads in Kittitas Count and across the State of Washington; and
WHEREAS: The definition for "No Net Loss" was vetted through the Public Lands Advisory
Committee with participation from public land manager;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of County Commissioners defines
how the community achieves "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads as being:
To achieve "No Net Loss" any established road or roads that are currently open which are
permanently eliminated for the use of public travel by way of motorized transportation on public
land or a public road should be replaced in the system by another road giving passage into the
same geographical area.
The following methods, appearing below, are used to achieve "No Net Loss" for public access
on public roads.
How to Mitigate for Road Closures
(1) If the State or Federal Agency can demonstrate unequivocally why the permanent road
closure is necessary and/or mandatory with no alternative to give passage into the same
geographical area they can replace that road loss with a comparable road network by going
through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected.
This should aim to provide a road network that is equal to or superior to the original road as
determined by public input.
(2) When a State or Federal Agency purchases private land with existing roads they shall go
through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected to
assist in determining which roads shall remain open for public use by motorized transportation.
In this process roads should aim to provide access to distinct geographic areas, scenic or
interesting wildland experience, and lands that have a defined historical importance.
DATED this 25th day of March, 2019 at Ellensburg, Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik
Board- Mandy Buchholz
0C/NT,1WASN\c\\\\.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ory Wright, Chairman
ABSENT
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT
STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019
ACTION REQUESTED: Request to Approve a Resolution to Authorize Chair
Signature on the Digital Submittal Certification to the
County Road Administration Board
BACKGROUND: Annually, the County Sheriff, County Auditor and the
Board Chair are required to certify traffic law enforcement
diversions from the Road Fund. The County Engineer is
also required to sign certification documents. The Sheriff,
Auditor and County Engineer have all signed. The Board
Chair's signature is now needed completing the annual
report.
Annually, the Chair of the Board of County Commissioners
and County Engineer are required to certify the following
reports to the County Road Administration Board (CRAB):
2018 Annual Construction Report
2018 County Arterial Preservation Report
2018 Maintenance Management Annual
Certification.
The County Engineer has signed the required certification
and the Chair is now required to sign the reporting
document.
INTERACTION: Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chair's signature on required annual Road
Fund expenditure certification reporting (including the
traffic law enforcement) to CRAB.
HANDLING: Return one original to Public Works
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; County Road Diversion Supporting
Documentation
LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2019 -
AUTHORIZE THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON THE DIGITAL SUBMITTAL
CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD FOR 2018
ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES
WHEREAS: The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires annual reporting of
various Road Fund expenditures by the County Engineer; and
WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor, County Engineer and the Chair of the Board
of County Commissioners are required to annually certify Road Fund diversions
supporting Traffic Law Enforcement (TLE) activities; and
WHEREAS: The County Sheriff, County Auditor and County Engineer have all signed the
certification reporting $199,803.77 in 2018 Road Fund diversion; and
WHEREAS: The County Engineer has signed the required reports and said reports are now
ready for Chair signature; and
WHEREAS: The Chair of the Board of County Commissioners signature is now required to
complete 2018 County Road Administration Board (CRAB) reporting
requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the
best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's signature on the Digital Submittal
Certification to the County Road Administration Board for 2018 Road Fund Expenditures.
DATED this 25th day of March, 2019, at Ellensburg, Washington.
Attest:
❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik
❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Cory Wright, Chairman
Brett Wachsmith, Vice -Chairman
Laura Osiadacz, Commissioner
C.A.R.S.
Kittitas County 2018
Page 1 of
CERTIFICATION OF ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT
WAC 136-150-022
Total Road Levy:
Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $4,178,221.31
021):
Actual Road Levy revenue produced: $4,174,140.17
Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Levv Diversion:
Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $199,996.88
021):
Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy: $199,803.77
Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and identifiable account (RCW 36.82.040): Yes
Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Fund Expenditures:
Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00
Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00
Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures: $199,803.77
Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS): $218,610.00
RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all
revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including traffic law enforcement, as are allowed
by Article Il, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural
Arterial Trust Account.
This form must be reviewed and certified (on the "Engineer's Certification Form") by:
• County Sheriff
County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer
Chair, Board of County Commissioners OR County Executive
hrtps://uww.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/201
C.A.R.S.
Kiftitas County Annual Certification For Calendar Year 2018
WAC 136-04
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
A. During 2018 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified in RCW
36.80.030.
B. At anytime during 2018 was there a vacancy/change in the position of County Engineer? If so, were the
procedures in WAC 136-12 followed?
Page 1 of:
Yes
Yes
Explanation:
County Engineer, Gregory L Huck resigned employment as of 4-1-2018. Board Resolution for Interim Acting County Engineer
2018-066 appointed Mark Cook, licensed professional engineer.
C. The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2018 complied with WAC 136-28. Yes
D. Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the arterial road Yes
system in 2018 per WAC 136-14-020.
E. As of December 31, 2018 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies set by the county
legislative authority including, but not limited to, the following specific policies required by WAC 136-50-050:
'Has your agency sent the most recently adopted version to CRAB WAC 136-50-0517
POLICY
WAC
Re:
Organization
136-50-051
Re:
Personnel Practices
136-50-052
Re:
Complaint Handling
136-50-053
Re:
Work for Others
136-50-054
Re:
Utility Accommodation
136-50-055
Re:
Priority Programming
136-14-030
F. The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner:
DATE OF CURRENT VERSION
02/15/2018
12/01/2013
01/11/1999
06/02/1998
03/30/2004
09/01/1998
DATE SENT TO
CRAB
09/22/2017
12/16/2017
12/27/2017
12/18/2017
12/29/2017
01/31/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019
DOCUMENT
WAC
DUE DATE
DATE OF ADOPTION I
'18
Six -Year Program
136-15-050
31 -DEC -17
PREPARATION
09/19/2017
'18
Annual Construction Program
136-16-040
31 -DEC -17
12/08/2017
'18
CAPP Program
136-300-060
31 -DEC -17
12/27/2017
'18
Road Fund Budget
31 -DEC -17
12/08/2017
'18
Maintenance Management Work
136-11-040
31 -DEC -17
12/27/2017
Plan 8 Budget
'18
Road Levy
136-150-021
01 -FEB -18
12/08/2017
'17
Certification of Road Fund Exp.
136-150-022
01 -APR -18
03/26/2018
For Traffic Law Enforcement
'17
Engineer's Certification of Fish
136-150-023
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
Barrier Removal Costs
'17
Certification of Road Fund Exp.
136-150-025
01 -APR -18
for Marine Navigation and
Moorage
'17
Annual Construction Report
136-16-050
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
'17
CAPP Report
136-300-090
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
'17
Maintenance Management
136-11-050
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
Certification
'17
Annual Certification
136-04-030
01 -APR -18
03/20/2018
'17
Road Log Update
136-60-030
01 -MAY -18
'18
PMS Certification for CAPA
136-70-070
31 -DEC -18
03/20/2018
Eligibility
DATE SENT TO
CRAB
09/22/2017
12/16/2017
12/27/2017
12/18/2017
12/29/2017
01/31/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
03/30/2018
https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019
C.A.R.S.
Explanation:
Kittitas county does not have expenses for Marine Navigation and Moorage.
Page 2 of
G. Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2018 Yes
Annual Program or as amended per WAC 136-16-042 - Attach Amendments. (If No, please attach a
brief explanation.)
H. The County's construction by county forces limit for 2018 computed in accordance with RCW 36.77.065: $1,267,683.75
The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2018 Annual Const. Report: $36,817.00
J. As required by WAC 136-20-060, a written Bridge and Inspection Report for 2018 was furnished to the
legislative authority on (attach a copy):
https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/14/2019
Kittitas County
Reports for 2018
Digital Submittal Certification
for Forms Due April 1st
The documents checked below are hereby submitted from Kittitas County for the review and acceptance of the County Road
Administration Board.
tpti,2018 RAP Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Traffic
Law Enforcement
I hereby certify that the above report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for
submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136.
l
Signed: i Date: -3,1412t
I
County Sheriff _
Signed:
Chair I Executive
__. _............................
Date:
2018 Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage
Barrier Removal Nj/pp,
jo 2018 Annual Certification
I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have
reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC
136.
Signed: Date:
Chair/ Executive
Signed: / iirg�L Date: 3'/ 1-/ /
------------------------------------------------
_ _ _ Coun En ineer
,4e 2018 Annual Construction Report
2018 County Arterial Preservation Report
c9 2018 Maintenance Management Annual Certification
I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Report, County Arterial Preservation Report, and Maintenance
Management Certification are true and accurate and that I have reviewed, approved, and submitted said reports to
the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. j
Signed: /' Date:
__. CountY En'rneer.......-'-"-""'.......................................................
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT
STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019
ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Resolution Stating the Board's Position of
"No Net Loss" for Access on Public Roads
BACKGROUND: Since fall of 2018, the Kittitas County Board of County
Commissioners has been working with the Public Lands
Advisory Committee developing a definition and Board
statement regarding no net loss for access on public roads.
Recently, the Committee presented a final definition to the
Board and final modifications have been made ready for
formal Board acceptance.
The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and
the Washington State Department of Natural Resources
have both been integral in developing the proposed final
definition for: "No Net Loss".
INTERACTION: Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution Stating the Board's position of "no
net loss" for access on public roads.
HANDLING: Return one original to Public Works
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION
NO.: 2019 -
POSITION STATEMENT FROM KITTITAS COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS: "NO NET LOSS" FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ON PUBLIC ROADS
WHEREAS: Public lands constitute nearly 71 percent of the total land area of Kittitas County;
and
WHEREAS: Kittitas County values the partnerships developed with all public land managers
within the county; and
WHEREAS: Public land managers requested a definition from the Kittitas County Board of
Commissioners for "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads; and
WHEREAS: Kittitas County Commissioners established the Kittitas County Public Lands
Advisory Committee November 18, 2013 with the adoption of Resolution 2013-
134; and
WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Public Lands Advisory Committee's By -Laws state, "Public
lands are a vital community resource. The vision of the Public Lands Advisory
Committee is to create cooperative relationships with public lands managers to
ensure that public lands in Kittitas County provide access for the public and are
sustainably managed for multiple uses while providing opportunities for outdoor
recreation and economic benefit to County residents; and
WHEREAS: On June 9, 2016 the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners Adopted Resolution
2016-076 approving a county recreation plan: The Kittitas County Park.
Recreation. and Open Space (PROS) Plan wherein Policy 6.5.1 states,
"Coordinate and support a comprehensive system of off-road 4 -wheel drive and
all -terrain vehicle trails and backcountry roads that access scenic, environmental,
historic, and open space attributes throughout Kittitas County expanding and
linking existing trail systems in the urban and upper county areas into area -wide
networks including the Wenatchee National Forest, Teanaway Community Forest,
Naneum Ridge State Forest, LT Murray, Oak Creek, Wenas, Colockum, and
Whiskey Dick Wildlife Areas; and
WHEREAS: Kittitas County Board of Commissioners support "No Net Loss" for public access
on public roads in Kittitas Count and across the State of Washington; and
WHEREAS: The definition for "No Net Loss" was vetted through the Public Lands Advisory
Committee with participation from public land manager;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Board of County Commissioners defines
how the community achieves "No Net Loss" for public access on public roads as being:
To achieve "No Net Loss" any established road or roads that are currently open which are
permanently eliminated for the use of public travel by way of motorized transportation on public
land or a public road should be replaced in the system by another road giving passage into the
same geographical area.
The following methods, appearing below, are used to achieve "No Net Loss" for public access
on public roads.
How to Mitigate for Road Closures
(1) If the State or Federal Agency can demonstrate unequivocally why the permanent road
closure is necessary and/or mandatory with no alternative to give passage into the same
geographical area they can replace that road loss with a comparable road network by going
through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected.
This should aim to provide a road network that is equal to or superior to the original road as
determined by public input.
(2) When a State or Federal Agency purchases private land with existing roads they shall go
through a public process with meetings and outreach efforts conducted in the county affected to
assist in determining which roads shall remain open for public use by motorized transportation.
In this process roads should aim to provide access to distinct geographic areas, scenic or
interesting wildland experience, and lands that have a defined historical importance.
DATED this 25th day of March, 2019 at Ellensburg, Washington
Attest:
❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik
❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Cory Wright, Chairman
Brett Wachsmith, Vice -Chairman
Laura Osiadacz, Commissioner
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT
STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Tax Parcel 693835
ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff Prepare Enabling Legislation Supporting
Property Transfer to the City of Cie Elam, WA
LEAD STAFF:
Mark R. Cook
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct that staff prepare enabling legislation supporting property transfer (tax parcel
number 693835) to the City of Cie Elum, WA.
BRIEFING SUMMARY:
• Public Works (PW) owns tax parcel no. 693835 in Cle Elum, WA
• PW has no need for the parcel
• The City of Cie Elum is interested in acquiring the parcel supporting a future dog
park
• 2019 market value for the parcel is $100.
• RCW allows transfer for recreational purposes
BACKGROUND:
Earlier in March, Public Works (PW) noticed the Board of County Commissioners
(BOCC) of the City of Cie Elum's interest in PW tax parcel no. 693835. The parcel
provides no benefit to Public Works and lists as having a land value of $100 in 2019
market value (EXHIBIT 1). PW pays $4.91 annually in property taxes.
DISCUSSION:
Revised Code of Washington provides for transfer of property for use for park and
recreational purposes at RCW 39.33.060. Providing the City of Cie Elum writes the
BOCC a letter stating their intention to create the dog park and request the transfer of tax
parcel 4693835; PW will prepare enabling documents and docket for BOCC action.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
PW pays $4.91 annually for property valued at $100.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Kittitas County Taxsifter Information, TP# 693835
Exhibit 2: RCW 39.33.060
Page l of 3
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
EXHIBIT 1: KITTITAS COUNTY TAXSIFTER INFORMATION, TP# 693835
Page 2 of 3
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
TerraSean TaxSifter - KITTITAS County Washington Page 1 of 2
KITTITAS COUNTY
WASHINGTON TAXSIFTER
SIMPLESEARCH SALE SEA H COU»�HgMEPAOE CONUA T DISCLAIMER NWMENTCARTM
Mike Hougardy
Kittitas County Assessor 205 W 5th Ave Ste 101 Ellensburg WA 98926
Assessor Treasurer Appraisal Mari
Parcel
Parcel#:
693835
Billed
Owner Name: KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS)
Land
DOR Code:
67 - Services - Governmental
Total
Add,assl:
Taxable
2019
Situs:
OAKES AVE CLE SLUM
WORKS)
Address2:
411 N RUBY ST STE 1
$0
Map Number:
20-15-26054-0101
$0
City, State:
ELLENSBURG WA
CO (PUBLIC
Status:
EXEMPT FULL YEAR
$0
Zip:
98926-6300
$100
Description:
CD. 4048-1; CLE ELUM,
CONNELLS ADD.; LOTS
1 THRU 14; BLOCK I (ROAD)
WORKS)
Comment:
$0
$0
$100
$100
$0
2019 Market Value
2019 Taxable
Value
2019 Assessment Data
$100
Land:
$100
Land:
$0
District: 28 - CICE
SD404 H02
Improvements:
$0
Improvements:
$0
$0
CO COF ST
Permanent Crop:
$0
Permanent Crop:
$0
Current Use/DFL:
No
Total
$100
Total
$0
Senior/Disability Exemption:
No
Total Acres:
0.00000
Ownership
Owner's Name Ownership %
KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS) 100 %
Saies History
No Sales History
Building Permits
No Building Permits Available
Historical Valuation Into
Year
Billed
Owner
Land
Impr.
PermCrop Value
Total
Exempt
Taxable
2019
KITTITAS
CO (PUBLIC
WORKS)
$100
$0
$0
$100
$100
$0
2018
KITTITAS
CO (PUBLIC
WORKS)
$100
$0
$0
$100
$100
$0
2017
KITTITAS
CO (PUBLIC
WORKS)
$100
$0
$0
$100
$100
$0
2016
KITTITAS
CO (PUBLIC
WORKS)
$100
$0
$0
$100
$100
$0
2015
KrTTITAS
CO (PUBLIC
WORKS)
$100
$0
$0
$100
$100
$0
VielLdD;rj
Parcel Comments
No Comments Ava liable
Property Images
No Images found.
http://taxsi fter.co.kittitas. wa.uslAssessor.aspx?key ld=883227&parcelNumber=69383 5&ty... 3/20/2019
TerraScan TaxSifter - KITTITAS County Washington Page 1 of 2
KITTITAS COUNTY
WASHINGTON TAXSIPTER
SIMPLE SEARCH $ALES SEARCH COUNTY HOME PAGE C NTAC DISCLAIMER
PAYMENT CART(01
AMY CZISKE
Kittitas County Treasurer 205 W 5th AVE Suite 102 Ellensburg WA 98926
Assessor Treasurer Appraisal MapSifter
Parcel
Parcel#:
693835
Owner Name:
KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC WORKS)
DOR Code:
67 - Services - Governmental
Addressl:
CO (PUBLIC WORKS)
Situs:
OAKES AVE CLE ELUM
AddressZ:
411 N RUBY ST STE 1
Map Number:
20-15-26054-0101
City, State:
ELLENSBURG WA
Status:
EXEMPT FULL YEAR
Zip:
98926-6300
Description:
Co. 4048-1; CLE ELUM, CONNELLS ADD.;
LOTS 1 THRU 14; BLOCK 1
(ROAD)
Comment:
Fees
Balance Due
Real Property
Current Tax Year Details
Type Taxpayer Statement # Gross Tax Tax Exempt Net Tax Asmts Total Tax
Real Property KITTITAS CO (PUBLIC 2019-693835
WORKS) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4.91 $4.91
Balances Due
Type
Taxpayer
Statement
# Tax Amount
Interest
Fees Due
Balance(s)
Due -
Real Property KITTITAS
CO (PUBLIC WORKS)
2019-693835
$4.91
$0.00 $0.00
$4.91 ❑
' Please expect a
delay a 3-5 business days for your payment to Post. Note:
Tire receipt date will reflect the
Add Selected to Cisrt
day the payment was Initiated.
5 Year Tax History
Type
Statement Number
Taxes
Assessments
Fees
Balance Due
Real Property
2019-693835
$0.00
$4.91
$0.00
$4.91
Type
Statement Number
Taxes
Assessments
Fees
Balance Due
Real Property
20182018�3S
$0.00
$4.91
$0.00
$0.00
Receipt Number
Receipt Date
Taxes/Fees
Interest Paid
Total Paid
2018-0750770
03/19/2018
$4.91
$0.00
$4.91
Type
Statement Number
Taxes
Assessments
Fees
Balance Due
Real Property
2017-693835
$0.00
$4.91
$0.00
$0.00
Receipt Number
Receipt Date
Taxes/Fees
Interest Paid
Total Paid
2017-0705653
04/24/2017
$4.91
$0.00
$4,91
Type
Statement Number
Taxes
Assessments
Fees
Balance Due
Real Property
20162016693-835
$0.00
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
Receipt Number
Receipt Date
Taxes/Fees
Interest Paid
Total Paid
2016-0634158
04/18/2016
$5.00
$0.00
$5.00
Type
Statement Number
Taxes
Assessments
Fees
Balance Due
Real Property
2015-693835
$0.00
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
http://taxsifter.co.kittitas.wa.usITreasurer.aspx?keyld=883227&pareelNumber=693835 &ty... 3/20/2019
TerraScan TaxSifter - KITTITAS County Washington
Receipt Number
Receipt Date
Taxes/Fees
2015-0575545
04/27/2015
$5.00
Type Statement Number
Taxes
Assessments
Real Property 2014-693833
$0.00
$5.00
Receipt Number
Receipt Date
Taxes/Fees
2014-0504660
04/07/2014
$5.00
Property Images
No images found.
1,0.6927.19068 D.1a mnent.s aC 3/]9/3019 a:50 M
Page 2 of 2
Interest Paid Total Paid
$0.00 $5.00
Fees
Balance Due
$0.00
$0.00
Interest Paid
Total Paid
$0.00
$5.00
1%Pa11Y¢A �iP'. i01p
http://taxsifter.co.kittitas.wa.usITreasurer.aspx?kcyld=883227&parcelNumber=693 835&ty... 3/20/2019
EXHIBIT 2: RCW39,33.060
Page 3 of 3
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Chapter 39.33 RCW: INTERGOVERNMENTAL DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY Page 4 of 5
Washington, or with any person, firm or corporation for public transportation services or for the
use of all or any part of any publicly owned transportation facilities for such period and under
such terms and conditions and upon such rentals, fees and charges as the legislative body
operating such public transportation system may determine, and may pledge all or any portion
of such rentals, fees and charges and all other revenue derived from the ownership or
operation of publicly owned transportation facilities to pay and to secure the payment of
general obligation bonds and/or revenue bonds of such municipality issued for the purpose of
acquiring or constructing a public mass transportation system.
[ 1969 ex.s. c 255 § 16.]
NOTES:
Construction -Severability -1969 ex.s. c 255: See notes following RCW
35.58.272.
Public transportation systems: RCW 35.58.272 and 35.58.2721.
39.33.060
Transfer of property or contract for use for park and recreational
purposes.
Any governmental unit, as defined in RCW 36.93.020(1) as it now exists or is hereafter
amended, may convey its real or personal property or any interest or right therein to, or
contract for the use of such property by, the county or park and recreation district wherein
such property is located for park or recreational purposes, by private negotiation and upon
such terms and with such consideration as might be mutually agreed to by such governmental
unit and the board of county commissioners or the park and recreation district board of
commissioners.
[ 1971 ex.s, c 243 § 7.1
39.33.070
School districts and libraries—Disposal of obsolete or surplus reading
materials—Procedures.
Any school district or educational service district, after complying with the requirements
of RCW 28A.335.180, and any library, as defined in RCW 27.12.010, may dispose of surplus
or obsolete books, periodicals, newspapers, and other reading materials as follows:
(1) If the reading materials are estimated to have value as reading materials in excess
of one thousand dollars, they shall be sold at public auction to the person submitting the
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http_11www.novapdf.com) !0/2019
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT
STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: 2019 Spring Flood Update
ACTION REQUESTED: Informational Only
LEAD STAFF:
Mark R. Cook
RECOMMENDATION:
Informational only — no action required.
BRIEFING SUMMARY:
• Public Works (PW) recently met with area irrigators and the City of Ellensburg
• Weather conditions have remained favorable (through 03-22-2019)
• Freezing night temperatures have been favorable
• PW is expecting localized flooding at Whiskey and Mercer
BACKGROUND:
On Tuesday (03-19-2019) PW maintenance management staff met with representatives from
the City of Ellensburg and the three main irrigation districts (EWC, KCRD and Cascade).
We reviewed current areas of concern and reviewed general known areas of lower County
flooding. Reports are favorable from Upper County relative to the amount of snow and ice in
main irrigation canals.
DISCUSSION:
Some amount of rain is expected this weekend. Concern is for daytime temperatures
exceeding 50 degrees Fahrenheit coupled with over a quarter inch of rain. Soil conditions
remain completely saturated and any amount of precipitation is expected to immediately
runoff the landscape. Snow pack at upper elevations appear to be consolidating well (low
water content) adding to confidence of a minimal flood event this spring. Local irrigation
managers' report that that snow pack conditions represent approximately 80 percent of
normal going into the runoff season. In conclusion, we have benefitted greatly from freezing
conditions at night with relatively moderate daytime temperatures. This mix of temperature
conditions is allowing a sustained orderly melt off of area snow pack with minimal impact to
area streams.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
PW is budgeted for flood fight operations in the 2019 maintenance budget. Additional
funding is available in the County's Flood Control Zone District 2019 budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 1 of 1
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT
STUDY SESSION DATE: March 25, 2019
TOPIC: Flood Alleviation at Bowers Field Airport (ELN)
ACTION REQUESTED: informational Briefing—No Action Required
LEAD STAFF:
Mark R. Cook
RECOMMENDATION:
Support the preferred flood alleviation alternative submitted to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA).
BRIEFING SUMMARY:
• Public Works (PW) recently submitted a preferred flood alleviation proposal to
the Federal Aviation Administration as part of ongoing Environmental
Assessment work at Bowers Field (ELN)
• Flood modeling suggests significant benefit to the airport and downstream
property owners
• The FAA will now be lobbied for including flood alleviation into the Capital
Facility Plan
BACKGROUND:
PW's hydrology and hydraulics consultant (Watershed Science and Engineering) utilized
the County's Whiskey and Mercer Creeks two dimensional flow model testing various
flood alleviation options for ELN. The work is funded by the Environmental Assessment
begin conducted in support of the Capital Improvement Plan. During recent years, flood
flows have forced intermittent closures of runway 11-29.
DISCUSSION:
The following preferred actions are being presented to the FAA as an Appendix to the
EA (EXHIBIT 1):
• Extend/cleanout the taxiway ditch to the north end of runway 11-29
• Construct an east -west ditch along abandoned taxiway at north end of runway 11-
29 to capture and route overland flow away from Bowers Field and towards
Whiskey Creek to prevent flooding across runways
Page 1 of 3
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
• Construct storage ponds at west end of Bowers Field to detain flow from the new
east -west ditch and allow controlled release to Whiskev Creek. Size culverts at
the pond outlet to restrict outflow to Whiskey Creek and prevent any increase to
peak flooding downstream.
Construct storage ponds to the west of Whiskey Creek on Kittitas County property
upstream of Hungry Junction Road. Size ponds and outlet structures to attenuate
peak flow on Whiskey Creek and to work in conjunction with storage ponds west
of Bowers Field to avoid downstream flood impacts on Whiskey Creek.
The actions listed above are expected to alleviate flooding across runway 11-29 and
reduce shallow flooding on the western edge of the airport property. New and expanded
ditches route overland flow away from both airport facilities and downstream properties
between Whiskey and Mercer Creeks. The flood storage ponds provide enough
live storage to prevent routed flow from increasing peak flood depths downstream while
still draining within 12 hours of the flood peak to meet FAA requirements for surface
impoundment.
The complete technical memorandum from WSE is attached as EXHIBIT 1 for Board
review. Actual implementation of the storage proposal will entail significant additional
engineering and is expected to require additional funding.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
The cost of implementing the various preferred alternatives is currently being developed
Once costs are in hand, PW will approach the FAA requesting funding for constructing
the identified preferred alternatives.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: WSE Bowers Field EA Flood Reduction Alternatives Analysis
Page 2 of 3
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
EXHIBIT 1: WSE BOWERS FIELD EA FLOOD REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES
ANALYSIS
Page 3 of 3
PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
KMT'07AS COUH?b AoEaPOR7
913111 *3
Bowers Field EA Flood
Reduction Alternatives Analysis
%FWEST CENTURY � i � r :J n .:. � � � n.,.:. i , . 29
�A' .. � ,..
yr*` WATERSHED
Memorandum
To: Kurt Addicott, PE, Century West Engineering
From: Colin Butler, EIT & Chris Frei, PE, Watershed Science & Engineering
Date: March 12, 2019
Re: DRAFT— Bowers Field EA Flood Reduction Alternatives Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Watershed Science & Engineering (WSE) completed hydraulic modeling and analysis to support the design
of planned improvements at Bowers Field airport near Ellensburg, WA (see Figure 1). The airport is located
within the 100 -year floodplain of both Whiskey and Mercer Creeks, and planned airport improvements
have the potential to impact flood hazards on and downstream of the airport property. WSE updated an
existing HEC -RAS 2D hydraulic model of Whiskey and Mercer Creeks to evaluate several alternatives for
reducing flood risk to airport facilities without negatively impacting downstream properties. Results from
this analysis will support the Bowers Field Environmental Assessment (EA) being prepared by Century
West Engineering (Century West).
BACKGROUND
The Bowers Field EA currently being prepared by Century West is based on planned
implementation of the 2018-2023 portion of the Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Capital Improvement
Program. Short term projects covered under the EA include rehabilitation of runway 7-25, runway 11-29,
runway 11-29 parallel taxiway, and AC hold areas, in addition to other site grading, pavement removal,
and taxiway development. WSE was contracted by Century West to complete a hydraulic analysis for
selecting a preferred set of actions to reduce or eliminate problematic flooding at the airport and to
demonstrate that proposed actions covered by the EA will not worsen 100 -year flood conditions
downstream from the airport.
Problematic flooding on the airport runway under existing conditions is the result of overland flow
escaping Mercer Creek northeast of the airport both upstream and downstream of Hungry Junction Road.
Most of this flow concentrates in a taxiway ditch parallel to runway 11-29 before ponding and flowing
across the runway near the intersection of runway 11-29 and runway 7-25. Flow overtopping the runways
ultimately impacts airport facilities and private property downstream of the runway intersection.
HYDRAULIC MODELING
WSE completed hydraulic modeling based on an existing unsteady HEC -RAS 2D hydraulic model of
Whiskey and Mercer Creeks that was constructed fora study to update FEMA flood maps in Kittitas County
(WSE, 2018). The model was modified to run in the latest version of HEC -RAS (version 5.0.6).
Peak flow hydrology for Whiskey and Mercer Creeks was developed previously for the 2018 FEMA
mapping study (WSE, 2018). 24-hour inflow hydrographs applied to the model simulate a rain -on -snow
event representing typical historical flooding in the region. Table 1 lists 2-, 10-, and 100 -year annual
V"A I E F:S H i U,!(I, I':{F&ENGI"E E RI NI BOG.: ' ,, Suit« i cll;'r .illi ":/,9 iCi ""-1, 1 -W'00
instantaneous peak flows along Whiskey and Mercer Creeks upstream and downstream of the airport
property. Approximately 67 cfs is currently simulated to overtop the airport runway under existing
conditions during the peak of the 100 -year event.
Table 1. Annual Instantaneous Peak Discharges for Whiskey and Mercer Creek Near Bowers Field
r OdK nuw m Bno near main creeK cnannei
ExISTING CONDITION MODEL
The model was updated to represent existing site conditions by incorporating recent topographic survey
from Century West of the two airport runways and adjacent areas into the model terrain. The existing
condition model was then run to simulate the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year flood events'. Figure 2 shows 100 -
year model results indicating significant overland flow across Bowers Field and over runway 11-29. The
updated existing condition model provides a baseline for the alternatives analysis and evaluation of
project impacts.
WITH -PROJECT MODEL
A with -project model was developed to represent planned changes to the airport grading. These changes
include modifications to runway and taxiway extents and resurfacing that will be completed independent
of flood reduction measures. The with -project model was developed by merging a with -project terrain
surface (provided by Century West) with the existing condition model terrain.
1 2- and 10 -year flood simulation results are shown in Appendix A. 2- and 10 -year flooding would be primarily contained in.
channel or captured within existing airport drainage features. The 100 -year flood was therefore the focus of the alternatives
analysis.
WATERSHED I' f• 12
Annual Instantaneous Peak Discharge° (cfs)
Return Interval
Whiskey Creek
Mercer Creek
(Years)
Upstream
Airport
Downstream
Airport
Upstream
Airport
Downstream
Airport
On Airport
Above Hungry
Junction Road
Below Bowers
Road
Above Hungry
Junction Road
Below Bowers
Road
Across Runway
Intersection
2
81.7
84.1
14.8
19.4
0.0
10
160.4
186.4
77.6
89.3
0.0
100
524.4
733.0
293.3
333.1
66.8
r OdK nuw m Bno near main creeK cnannei
ExISTING CONDITION MODEL
The model was updated to represent existing site conditions by incorporating recent topographic survey
from Century West of the two airport runways and adjacent areas into the model terrain. The existing
condition model was then run to simulate the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year flood events'. Figure 2 shows 100 -
year model results indicating significant overland flow across Bowers Field and over runway 11-29. The
updated existing condition model provides a baseline for the alternatives analysis and evaluation of
project impacts.
WITH -PROJECT MODEL
A with -project model was developed to represent planned changes to the airport grading. These changes
include modifications to runway and taxiway extents and resurfacing that will be completed independent
of flood reduction measures. The with -project model was developed by merging a with -project terrain
surface (provided by Century West) with the existing condition model terrain.
1 2- and 10 -year flood simulation results are shown in Appendix A. 2- and 10 -year flooding would be primarily contained in.
channel or captured within existing airport drainage features. The 100 -year flood was therefore the focus of the alternatives
analysis.
WATERSHED I' f• 12
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The with -project model surface was then modified to evaluate alternatives for flood reduction at Bowers
Field and mitigation of flood impacts to downstream properties. The following alternatives were identified
through discussion between WSE, Century West, and Kittitas County, and the analysis and results for each
evaluated alternative are discussed in the sections below:
Increasing in -channel flow conveyance of Mercer Creek by modifying the channel banks and/or
replacing the culvert under Hungry Junction Road
• Construction or modification of drainage ditches to capture and route flow around the airport
• Construction of flood storage (in combination with modifications to drainage ditches)
INCREASED IN -CHANNEL CONVEYANCE OF MERCER CREEK -BANK MODIFICATION
Flow escaping the Mercer Creek channel downstream of Hungry Junction Road contributes to overbank
flooding of airport facilities. Actions considered to increase channel capacity and reduce overtopping
included raising the channel bank at a channel bend on airport property downstream of Hungry Junction
Road. WSE updated the with -project model geometry to represent multiple potential bank configurations
and ran the model to simulate the 100 -year flood event.
An example of the resulting change in 100 -year flood depth from raising the channel bank (compared to
existing conditions) is shown in Figure 3. For any one of the configurations tested, raising the channel bank
reduced peak flooding at the airport but retained more flow within the Mercer Creek channel, leading to
increased flood depths along Mercer Creek downstream from the airport. No feasible measures were
identified to mitigate these impacts.
INCREASED IN -CHANNEL CONVEYANCE OF MERCER CREEK -HUNGRY JUNCTION CULVERT REPLACEMENT
The Mercer Creek culvert under Hungry Junction Road is undersized and contributes to backwatering and
road overtopping that floods the north end of Bowers Field and the airport runways. WSE updated the
with -project model to simulate replacing the existing 4 -ft corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culvert with a
larger structure and ran the model to simulate the 100 -year flood event.
An example of the resulting change in 100 -year flood depth from a combination of the upsized culvert
and raised channel bank (compared to existing conditions) is shown in Figure 4. Results indicate reduced
road overtopping along Hungry Junction Road and reduced peak flooding at the airport. However, more
flow within the Mercer Creek channel led to increased peak flood depths along Mercer Creek downstream
from the airport. No feasible measures were identified to mitigate these impacts.
DITCH MODIFICATION OR CONSTRUCTION
The following alternative ditch locations and alignments were evaluated:
Clean out the existing taxiway ditch along the east side of runway 11-29 to capture and route
flooding from the airport runways downstream to Mercer Creek
WATERSHED T- r p 3
Construct a new ditch from east to west along an abandoned taxiway between runway 11-29 and
Hungry Junction Road to capture water overtopping Hungry Junction Road and route it west
toward Whiskey Creek
• Extend the constructed east -west ditch (described above) south along the west side of the airport
to activate flood storage within an existing depression on airport property
WSE updated the with -project model geometry to represent each of these alternatives, including
variations on ditch length, size, and outlet location. Results indicate a reduction in flooding at airport
infrastructure but significantly increased flood depths at and downstream of each of the ditch outlets.
Ditch options were therefore considered in combination with flood storage (see next section) to reduce
peak outflow and eliminate downstream impacts.
FLOOD STORAGE CONSTRUCTION
Multiple flood storage configurations were evaluated in conjunction with drainage ditch construction to
reduce peak flows and mitigate downstream impacts from routing flooding away from airport facilities.
Storage alternatives were simulated by adding multiple low -height berms in series to maximize storage
within the steeply sloping terrain and to reduce the required height of each berm. Each storage area was
modeled with a low-level culvert outlet to meter outflow and allow stored water to drain during the flood
recession. Three storage configurations were examined:
1. Storage ponds at the northwest corner of Bowers Field, fed by a constructed east -west ditch
(described above). Water would be released Whiskey Creek through a culvert outlet.
Storage ponds at the southwest corner of Bowers Field (an alternative to the first configuration)
covering a natural depression in this area that would provide additional storage volume. Water
would be released to Whiskey Creek through a culvert outlet.
3. Storage ponds to the west of Whiskey Creek and north of Hungry Junction Road. These ponds
would be located away from the airport on property owned by Kittitas County.
Berm layouts for each storage configuration were determined through an iterative process to achieve
adequate flood storage. Berms were simulated by creating vertical walls on top of the existing model
terrain without any changes to the surrounding terrain surface. Equivalent storage volume could also be
achieved through a combination of shorter berms paired with excavation of the area upstream. Pond
outlets (culverts) were sized to maximize storage volume during the flood peak while allowing for
adequate drainage during the flood recession.
Final configuration results showed that storage alternatives 1 and 3 were effective at reducing 100 -year
peak flows and mitigating downstream impacts of flow routed through the ditches. However, storage
alternative 2 resulted in increased downstream flood depths that could not be mitigated due to the
location of the drainage outlet. Figure 5 shows the change in 100 -year flood depth (compared to existing
conditions) resulting from storage alternative 2 in conjunction with the Mercer Creek bank -raising
measure described above, indicating a significant increase in downstream flood depths downstream of
the storage outlet.
�=WATERSHED F [; e a
Additional locations for flood storage were considered, including areas northeast, east, and southeast of
the airport runways. These options were eliminated due to limitations caused by terrain features, slope,
and available area; therefore, no hydraulic analysis of these options was completed.
PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
WSE presented results of alternative model simulations to the County and Century West during online
meetings on 1/15/19 and 2/4/19. At the 2/4/19 meeting, the team selected a preferred alternative
consisting of the following combination of measures to reduce flooding to airport facilities and mitigate
downstream impacts (see Figure 6 diagram):
• Extend/cleanout the taxiway ditch to the north end of runway 11-29
• Construct an east -west ditch along abandoned taxiway at north end of runway 11-29 to capture
and route overland flow away from Bowers Field and towards Whiskey Creek to prevent
flooding across runways
• Construct storage ponds at west end of Bowers Field to detain flow from the new east -west
ditch and allow controlled release to Whiskey Creek. Size culverts at the pond outlet to restrict
outflow to Whiskey Creek and prevent any increase to peak flooding downstream.
• Construct storage ponds to the west of Whiskey Creek on Kittitas County property upstream of
Hungry Junction Road. Size ponds and outlet structures to attenuate peak flow on Whiskey
Creek and to work in conjunction with storage ponds west of Bowers Field to avoid downstream
flood impacts on Whiskey Creek.
The taxiway ditch cleanout extends approximately 1700 additional feet parallel to the runway from the
existing cleanout, and the constructed east -west ditch extends approximately 2800 feet from the access
road at the north end of Bowers Field to the abandoned taxiways at the west end of the airport
property. Constructed storage ponds consist of berms ranging from a maximum of 4 to 7 feet and 600 to
1000 feet long with aft x 3ft to 8ft x Sft rectangular outlets. The five storage ponds on Bowers Field
provide a peak storage volume of approximately 21 acre-feet during the 100 -year flood event. The four
storage ponds upstream of the airport provide a total peak storage volume of approximately 12 acre-
feet during the 100 -year flood event.
Resulting 100 -year flood depths and change in depth from the preferred alternative are shown in
Figures 7 and 8, respectively. In general, the preferred alternative routes flow around the airport
through a combination of ditches and storage, eliminating flooding across the airport runways and
downstream properties between Whiskey and Mercer Creeks. The storage ponds fill to maximum
capacity during the flood peak, then drain completely within 12 hours. Figure 8 indicates that there are
some changes in flood depth outside of the constructed ditches and storage ponds, although all of these
impacts are very minor (less than 0.1 ft change in depth) and are generally contained on County
property.
WATERSHED P a k> P 15
CONCLUSION
Bowers Field airport currently experiences problematic flooding across its runways during the 100 -year
flood event on Whiskey and Mercer Creeks, prompting a hydraulic analysis to asses flood reduction
measures. The preferred alternative determined by this analysis includes a combination of actions that
alleviate flooding across runway 11-29 and reduce shallow flooding on the western edge of the airport
property. New and expanded ditches route overland flow away from both airport facilities and
downstream properties between Whiskey and Mercer Creeks. The flood storage ponds provide enough
live storage to prevent routed flow from increasing peak flood depths downstream while still draining
within 12 hours of the flood peak to meet FAA requirements for surface impoundment.
REFERENCES
WSE (2018), "Whiskey and Mercer Creek Hydraulic Modeling and Analysis" Memorandum to Mark Cook,
Kittitas County Public Works. Watershed Science and Engineering, Seattle, WA, March 29, 2018.
WATERSHED l; 6
1I-
lagantl �
eg WnieMey 6 Me�re� UeeM
G /an.>e.aroen aovair awooe�r I I— —_
\\ifI
' II
l
��. vo
1 I R-wer]35
1
7 \
9
! \ McFerCrtet
t
f
wenw corp. wn
� Bowan Field EA ®W.
Project Locagon Map
DRAFT Flgure 1
lagantl �
eg WnieMey 6 Me�re� UeeM
G /an.>e.aroen aovair awooe�r I I— —_
\\ifI
' II
l
��. vo
1 I R-wer]35
1
7 \
9
! \ McFerCrtet
t
f
wenw corp. wn
� Bowan Field EA ®W.
Project Locagon Map
DRAFT Flgure 1
amm co��n. w�
(
Dept
®...
100year Flood Depth
00-yeng Flood
7"gend,gConditins
.11
jal.F,
DRAFT Figure 2
..m. cw�y. wA
Example Akernative
®...
'
Relae Mercer Bank
100year Charge In Depth
„n., � wArrasRao
=.ntl
100 -year R.I. Marcor Bank
Chrnae in OWh lel
-� 2,0-
.0
--20-10
RameMuur Wnk
-10-05
W-05 —42
0.0.14 _a01
-
.1.oz, (&,m
�•�
=0,01 ow
0 4.i -as
�iJ 42-4s
a
®4S 10
�1.0-00
>20
t
(
RMuu Aapon Fnctivp
F
1
i
—
s
E
r
r
q
Innwve Mttcer Creek Flrcd!q .
~
f
4N
-
i
..m. cw�y. wA
Example Akernative
®...
'
Relae Mercer Bank
100year Charge In Depth
„n., � wArrasRao
DRAFT Figure 3
DRAFT Figure 4
WA Example Alternative
j. Rabe Bank-Upsize Culvert .®rte,
100-year Change In Depth u.p• ♦ W1rFYSXf D
Legend
u�u na-wr �e�nX,� c�wen
100-year Re ise Meme r Bank B Upslee Calvert
pmuce o.niognieane WeX eoxsn Gimevq..
Change in Depth (n) ; r •;
`-z.0 } -�
�n.0-.0a gene vem�0enx'
® .05--02
o.e -o.i
.0 -om
L_] n. g.m lannry
001 0.10
D oi.0z
W102 D5
os- 1.0
Wtn.z0
�.eo
Enminaro 4raen Froaary
y
•.
� .�•.! \ � GUNer lnmeN MN[N C.N4nm0vg .
' � g
DRAFT Figure 4
wxur cm.,n. wn
Example Alternative
S Storage - Raise Hank
7D0 -year Change In Depth
Legend
700 -year South Storage & Raise Mercer Bank
Ctunga In oast, IPo
M. 20
=-a.o.-r.o
�I -1.0 -05
0.5- 02
=x2..01
`I .a m -.o of
n-001 ieimq
I—� 00r -0.m
.—jai.oi
C_10i-0.5
W 05 1.0
W to a.o
W,zo
«ea<N<rp(ea�k 811JM1y ,
a
\\ r
i�
\Y
Corcnunl5nut. StogOe Pa�ub ,a '-\
wn dEovuero FcelE
EIIIMNIfMrrpl Flpp}e
NCr<FW Fb(aillp <EigXel loWM4e<CreN
1 t
b
Inuesae Morar Clee<FioeO<p ..
DRAFT Figure 5
DRAFT Figure 6
YhYr LaIMy Wm
s
�••-
'
w...r,,� WmrfaSnfD
i- Preferred Attematiw
®F.. t
Diagram of Measure
LBpllld
Wea: M WTMry CF
6�arepe Berme
— lMlakey 6 Mslx Crteks
— 6buBe Berms
��—
NerT Bewxs�
1�
N
Iv' Wee10PMiefgq
S:erps proms
l�
cPe�
zM
f
1
i
d
1e
t
t
uau� creek
i
F
DRAFT Figure 6
s
�••-
'
w...r,,� WmrfaSnfD
DRAFT Figure 6
J
I �
Legend
i 1 rt�
100-year Preferred AlternativeDepth (n)
iFftp Ne Lounp, WR
Preferred Alternative ®�...
700-year Flood
DRAFT Figure 7
Depth
a
�r � W�rFBe{e
J
I �
Legend
i 1 rt�
100-year Preferred AlternativeDepth (n)
iFftp Ne Lounp, WR
Preferred Alternative ®�...
700-year Flood
DRAFT Figure 7
DRAFT Figure 8
wP
®.+
Pear Alternative t
7M 100 -year Change in Deplh �•-..
a• 4 w.rras.r0
ewlu,�a wem or w�.wer c,eer.
Legend sa,ye ae,m.
700 -War Pralamd AlUmative �•,-
1;
r cwm,a Easuwen oxm
Change In naPth Otl ,' ,
�
-..zo
-2n—to
IN -0.5 02
02--o.+ E..te
o+o -0m tao�o iorcn
01 Iffl-k)
aeu it
_7a.m
=0,1 02
jw oz -os �.
eonswe�w.si Ee�•F.b
a5 l.o
`` lo,ade Perms
10 20
>zo
\•
•_ .- EhoInpePwpm�pbcpra _ _
- EMMie DmnRlTam Flppp lmyy,e
Emnirele pawmrceam FbW MpeK .�
1
DRAFT Figure 8
DRAFT Appendix Al
Existing Conditions
3 -year Flood Depth )
_ n � FUtPfwfO
I
LegerM
Iyear Ezlfting Csnditbns i
Depth lft) f
IJ
DRAFT Appendix Al
DRAFT Appendix A2
TCeuMI. W/. I
Existing conditions
=� I -year Flood Depth 9n
f
T^� N,rkPSMID y r
//
10.ysar ExleWg CDntllllons �� l
Non Pa
A
�
dAKL`�Nti i
66I
i
DRAFT Appendix A2