The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019-01-14-minutes-public-works-study-sessionKITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Public Works Study Session Special Meeting Monday January 14, 2019 -1:00 PM Commissioners' Auditorium 205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg 1. Call to Order 2. Finance Staff Training at CWtI 3. FISH Food Bank Proposal 4. Floodplain Development Permit Fees for Kittitas County Conservation District 5. Bowers Field (ELN) Land Lease Modeling 6. Paths and Trails Funding 7. Other business 8. Adjourn Created on 1/11/2019 9:49:56 AM KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION MINUTES COMMISSIONERS' AUDITORIUM, 205 WEST 5TH ROOM 109 - ELLENSBURG Special Meeting MONDAY 1:00 PM JANUARY 14, 2019 Board members present: Chairman Cory Wright; Vice -Chairman Brett Wachsmith; Commissioner Laura Osiadacz Others: Mark Cook, Candie Leader, Public Works; Two (2) Members of the public At 1:01 pm Chairman Wright opened the Public Works Study Session. No additional agenda items were added. FINANCE STAFF TRAINING AT CWU Mark Cook stated that Scott Casey in the Finance Division is currently taking a course at CWU for Visual Basic programming to help utilize the Cayenta software that is used by county departments. Mark Cook added that the cost is around twelve hundred dollars ($1200) for the course. Discussion was held. FISH FOOD BANK PROPOSAL Mark Cook stated that he and Commissioner Laura Osiadacz recently met with a representative from the FISH Food Bank to discuss the program moving out to the Elmview building in the industrial area at Bowers Field. Mark Cook continued that FISH is looking for space to construct an industrial kitchen and dining area for the homeless and needy in the community. Mark Cook added that he is now looking for direction from the Board after reviewing financials and lease costs for the land and building. Discussion was held. Staff was directed to get more specific information from FISH regarding timelines and a more specific long range plan for the facility. FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FEES FOR KITTITAS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT Mark Cook reported that he was contacted by the Kittitas County Conservation District (KCCD) regarding Floodplain Development Permit fees for their projects. Mark Cook continued that KCCD has the authority to use a Habitat Exemption for certain projects but has chosen not to use the process because most of their funding is through grants. Mark Cook added that Kittitas County partners with KCCD on many projects in the community and suggests the Board consider waiving the fees for Floodplain Development Permits. Discussion was held. Staff was directed to prepare enabling documents for the February 5, 2019 agenda for consideration of waiving the requested fees. 2019-01-14 MINUTES BOWERS FIELD (ELN) LAND LEASE MODELING Mark Cook reported that several weeks ago the Board requested a financial model of alternatives for lease rates at Bowers Field. Mark Cook presented his alternatives for review and explained the how he forecasted expenses and potential review for new lease rates in an aggressive, moderate and low recovery scenario. Mark Cook stated that currently staff has eight (8) leases pending waiting on resolution of the modification/termination clause and three (3) new leases to be written as well. Discussion was held. Staff was directed to wait on a financial strategy until a potential appraisal can be done on Bowers Field. PATHS AND TRAILS FUNDING Mark Cook stated that recently representatives from "Towns to Teanaway" meet with the Board and presented a proposal for the county to hold easements across private property for the development of paths and trails in the Upper County. Mark Cook continued that he was asked to research the request and the budget needed to facilitate the request. Mark Cook added he spoke with the County Surveyor on the issue as well and he doesn't see any issues with the proposal. Discussion was held. Staff was directed to get started on the project and present documents at an upcoming agenda session. OTHER BUSINESS Chairman Cory Wright asked the other Board members if they would like to have a meeting with John Dobson for some more understanding of airport issues. Both Board members agreed. Meeting adjourned at 1:47 pm. 2019-01-14 MINUTES KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cory Wright, Chairman KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: January 14, 2019 TOPIC: Finance Staff Attending Central Washington University ACTION REQUESTED: None Required — Informational Only LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Support staff attendance at Central Washington University BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Recently, a Public Works (PW) Fiscal Analyst returned from attending the annual Cayenta users conference. • Integration of data out of Cayenta's work platform for reporting and analytics is best achieved using Visual Basic programming software. • PW is supporting the employee's attendance at (2) Visual Basic programming course at Central Washington University (CWU). BACKGROUND: During attendance at Cayenta's annual users conference in late 2018, our Fiscal Analyst discussed the use of Visual Basic with Cayenta programming staff. Cayenta staff affirmed the use of Visual Basic as a preferred mechanism integrating information from the Cayenta environment. Fiscal Manager Remeto requested authorization for our Analyst to audit a Visual Programming class at CWU. DISCUSSION: Developing an understanding of Visual Basic integrating PW tasks out of the Cayenta software is in the best interest of PW. Automation of time recording tasks assisting deployment of time entry by maintenance staff is a high priority for PW. In addition, learning that other areas within PW such as planning also have a huge need to be able to upload data from one program to another to satisfy various reporting requirements. One example was the hand entry of 700 pages of data into the mobility road program last year that took days, while with the use of visual basic we could have uploaded the information in a matter of minutes. FISCAL IMPACTS: The cost of auditing each course is $1000 for 40 hours of class. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1 - Course Descriptions EXHIBIT 1: COURSE DESCRIPTIONS r- r -a -tae .- .. s lagrct, Fees s of co "Pt. !Ir CS 105 - The Logical Basis of Computing f.]cL, Description: Students develop mathematical and quaninamv teasonmg skills by learning the fundamentals of computer programming. Students gainer understanding of possible connections betweerrtechnology and artistic expression. Basic Skill S- Reasoning. Course ,,If be offered every "a, (Fall, \anter, Spring, Summer; credits: 14) Learner Outcomes: Dpor successful completion of this course, the student will be able to Describe basic concepts of computer programming, including pseWowde memory allocation, the three programming control corsoucts!l. e. sequential, decision. repetition), morula, programming, file processing, and the use of arithmetic, relatlonal, and logical operators. Decompose a tempts. problem kno component pans (pseudmode). Implement the three programming control constructs (..e.sequenlef 1, selection and repetition) to solve problems. Morularlie code by wrong functions and procedures, and then signaling them to a.ecute in a click event Retain a perfmoem record of data generated by a program by writing and reading files. Allocate computer memory to store and set the scope of constant and variable values of diverse data lyparc such as Integer, Double, Decimal, String and Boolean. Implement parallel arrays without throwing an index out of range exceplion that stops program execution. Implement Visual Basic aritholetic operators to correctly pedrnm mathematical calculations. Implemem VlscaI Basic relational and logical operators to set pp Boolean expressions m solve decision and repetition problems. Identify and correct three i ri of programmirg errors. syntax, logia and mntime. Add comments to adequately annmate pmgrems. Develop the graphical user Interface to allow users to interact with the program Synthesize concepts seamed, and critically evaluate the digital woad with which they are surrounded, by identifying a problem to solve and developing the soimmn. This is known as the final project. CS 367 - Acvanced Visual Basic Pogramming CS 367 - Advanced Visual Basic Programming [i]lu Description: Visual Basic programming and applications. Topics will include advanced data structures, error trapping and debugging, advanced V8 and ActiveX controls, macros and databases. Not Intended for CS majors. Prerequisites: Prerequisites: CS 105 and CS 110. Credits: (4) Lesmer Outcomes: Upon successful completion of this course, the student will be able to: • Explain the importance of bullet-proofing programs • List and explain three different types of errors - rur:-time, syntax and logic • Use built-in error trapping and explain the types of erro•s it catches • Explain the disadvantages of GOTO statements Use the standard debugging techniques - data dump and hand -execution Use the integrated VB debugger KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook January 14, 2019 FISH Proposal Identify Follow up Actions RECOMMENDATION: Identify desired Commission actions for staff follow up. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • FISH desires relocating their existing facility to our Elm View facility at the airport • The existing building requires significant investment meeting FISH needs • Is there a viable financial plan assisting FISH improving our existing facility? BACKGROUND: Recently, Public Works and Commissioner Osiadacz met with a FISH representative touring our Elm View facility. FISH is entertaining the idea of constructing improvements supporting a commercial kitchen and dining area. Improvements will likely be built with conventional funding. DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that conventional lenders will need to see some collateral from FISH when underwriting a loan supporting Elm View building improvements. The building is owned by the County (1974 construction with the turn back taking place in 1994). The cost of anticipated initial improvements is estimated at approximately $250,000. FISH is suggesting that they have existing funds to construct the initial improvements and a lease payment structured to retire the cost of improvement. FISCAL IMPACTS: Utilizing our current land lease rate of $0.14/SF, $250,000 in tenant investment from FISH, and 2.24 acres of land lease (current Elm View lot); it will take approximately 18 years to recover the lost land lease revenue. This is a similar approach to that taken with Midstate Aviation tenant improvements to our main hangar at ELN. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: January 14, 2019 TOPIC: Kittitas Conservation District Floodplain Development Permit Fees ACTION REQUESTED: Waive Certain Kittitas County Conservation District Floodplain Development Permit Fees LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff waive Kittitas County Conservation District (KCCD) Floodplain Development Permit Fees for all fish barrier removal projects. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Kittitas County Conservation District is working with local private land owners removing barriers to fish passage • Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife is not covering these projects under RCW 77.55.181 • Kittitas Flood Control Zone District partners with KCCD routinely on fish barrier removal projects • Staff supports waiving of Floodplain Development Permit fees for KCCD fish barrier removal projects BACKGROUND: RCW 77.55.181 specifies the following: 4) No local government may require permits or charge fees for fish habitat enhancement projects that meet the criteria of subsection (1) of this section and that are reviewed and approved according to the provisions of this section. One current KCCD project has been denied coverage by Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife under RCW 77.55.181. The Caribou RM 1.17 Diversion Removal Project is the removal of a channel spanning concrete structure that was an unscreened irrigation diversion. Previous work moved the point of diversion of water to another location and provided a fish screen there. The current project is the final step which is removal of the structure. The Countys Floodplain Development ordinance does not provide discretion to the Public Works Director waiving fees. Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT DISCUSSION: Project funding for KCCD fish barrier removal projects is always tight. Adding County permit fees burdens these projects even further. PW desires the Board of County Commissioners support waiving KCCD Floodplain Development fees for all fish barrier removal projects now pending. PW desires the Board further waive future Floodplain Development Permit fees for all fish barrier removal projects. FISCAL IMPACTS: PW is currently charging $500 for a Floodplain Development Permit. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 of 2 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: January 14, 2019 TOPIC: ELN Land Lease Modeling Results ACTION REQUESTED: Provide Direction LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction regarding the Board's preferred land lease approach at Bowers Field. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Pursuant to a recent Board request, Public Works (PW) has completed requested ELN land lease modeling • Modeling results are attached as EXHIBIT 1 • Rate model, assumptions and projected future expenses reflect a confidence level less than 100 percent BACKGROUND: During an airport briefing on January 3, 2019; the Board requested PW to evaluate three fixed land lease rate approaches: aggressive, moderate and low. Staff selected five year land lease increases supporting the direction of the Board. The rate increases are arbitrarily selected by the Airport Manager. DISCUSSION: The conclusion of the analysis is presented below: Pursuing a fixed rate land lease model (aggressive) for a 25 year period predicts minimal risk so long as other revenue streams are maintained and additional leases are added throughout the planning period. Recapitalization cost for hangar repairs are not forecast. Additional FAA ACIP projects are not identified beyond extension of runway 11-29. To minimize risk, the aggressive model could be modified to reflect a two cent increase in each five year planning period. That revenue model is not evaluated but the above analysis suggests the moderate and low scenarios fail to generate sufficient revenue offsetting predicted expenses in the planning period. FISCAL IMPACTS: Refer to the attached Exhibit. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit l: Land Lease Rate Evaluation for Bowers Field Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 1: LAND LEASE RATE EVALUATION FOR BOWERS FIELD, 01082019 Page 2 of 2 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT DEPARTMENT OF PU13ILIC WORKS TO: Board of County Commissioners COPY: Candi Leader, Administrative Assistant DATE: January 8, 2019 FROM: Mark R. Cook, Director RE: ELN Lease Rates On January 3, 2019, the Board of County Commissioners requested that I evaluate three fixed land lease rate scenarios: aggressive, moderate and low. I have completed the analysis based on the following assumptions: Aggressive: 2019-2023 $0.14/SF 2024-2028 $0.16/SF 2029-2033 $0.18/SF 2034-2038 $0.19/SF 2039-2043 $0.20/SF Moderate: 2019-2023 $0.14/SF 2024-2028 $0.15/SF 2029-2033 $0.16/SF 2034-2038 $0.17/SF 2039-2043 $0.18/SF Low: 2019-2023 $0.14/SF 2024-2028 $0.14/SF 2029-2033 $0.15/SF 2034-2038 $0.15/SF 2039-2043 $0.161SF The various scenarios generate the following revenue in a 25 year period: Aggressive: $7,100,381 Moderate: $6,432,081 Low: $5,859,252 To understand the value of each rate scenario I forecast the following expenditures (based on our adopted 2019 ELN budget): pavement maintenance, grant obligations, salaries, operating, engineering/planning and miscellaneous. The following assumptions for each expense appear in Table 1 below. 411 N. Ruby, Suite #1 TEL (509) 962-7523 Ellensburg, WA 98926 FAX (509) 962-7663 Dept. of Public Works Page 2 Table 1: ELN Expense forecast assumptions Ex ense Base ear Assumed cost increase in five ears Pavement $60,000 Four ercent Grant $100,000 $312,000 Salaries $200,000 Two ercent O eratin $50,000 Three ercent En ineerin / lannin $50,000 :350,957$500,000 Miscellaneous $50,000 Two percent Using the assumptions from Table 1 above, the resulting expenses are tabulated in Table 2 below. Table 2: Forecast major expenses 2019-2043 Comparing the revenue generated in the three scenarios against the forecast cost demand for the 25 year planning period; we note the following: Aggressive revenue — forecast cost = $7,100,381 - $11,507,231 = $4,406,850 Moderate revenue — forecast cost = $6,432,081 - $11,507,231 = $5.075,150 Low revenue — forecast cost = $5,859,252 - $11,507,231 = $5,647,979 Presuming we can maintain our current revenue streams for: grazing, T hangars and main hangar use, we can expect to generate approximately $4.9 million during the 25 year planning period. Conclusion: Pursuing a fixed rate land lease model (aggressive) for a 25 year period predicts minimal risk so long as other revenue streams are maintained and additional leases are added throughout the planning period. Recapitalization cost for hangar repairs are not forecast. Additional FAA ACIP projects are not identified beyond extension of runway 11-29. To minimize risk, the aggressive model could be modified to reflect a two cent increase in each five year planning period. That revenue model is not evaluated but the above analysis suggests the moderate and low scenarios fail to generate sufficient revenue offsetting predicted expenses in the planning period. EXHIBIT 1: ELN Land Lease Model 205 West 5"', Rm 108 TEL (509) 962-7523 Ellensburg, WA 98926 FAX (509) 962-7663 2019-2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039-2043 t $300.000 $312,000 $324,480 $337,459 $300,000$1,000,000 :350,957$500,000 Wineerin/ $1,020000 $1,040,000 $1,061,208 1,082432 $250,000 $257,500 $265,225 $273,182 $281,377 n / lannin $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000ous $250000 25,302 $270,608$2,550,000 $2,394,500 $2,140,205 $2,187,151 $2,235,375 Comparing the revenue generated in the three scenarios against the forecast cost demand for the 25 year planning period; we note the following: Aggressive revenue — forecast cost = $7,100,381 - $11,507,231 = $4,406,850 Moderate revenue — forecast cost = $6,432,081 - $11,507,231 = $5.075,150 Low revenue — forecast cost = $5,859,252 - $11,507,231 = $5,647,979 Presuming we can maintain our current revenue streams for: grazing, T hangars and main hangar use, we can expect to generate approximately $4.9 million during the 25 year planning period. Conclusion: Pursuing a fixed rate land lease model (aggressive) for a 25 year period predicts minimal risk so long as other revenue streams are maintained and additional leases are added throughout the planning period. Recapitalization cost for hangar repairs are not forecast. Additional FAA ACIP projects are not identified beyond extension of runway 11-29. To minimize risk, the aggressive model could be modified to reflect a two cent increase in each five year planning period. That revenue model is not evaluated but the above analysis suggests the moderate and low scenarios fail to generate sufficient revenue offsetting predicted expenses in the planning period. EXHIBIT 1: ELN Land Lease Model 205 West 5"', Rm 108 TEL (509) 962-7523 Ellensburg, WA 98926 FAX (509) 962-7663 Dept. of Public Works Page 3 EXHIBIT 1; ELN Land Lease Model 01-08-2019 205 West 5', Rm 108 TEL (509) 962-7523 Ellensburg, WA 98926 FAX (509) 962-7663 ELH L. LeaaeM . 1IUa0f9 A 5 alum S0 SO E x 232+1 A3P r K'G AIP AJJ ee leI ima,. MS.�vul wyaq 700]011 re mg newts JNy30gJ Aawrorw IgdBttW geppyap 2018 419 3018 2019 2019 219 3019 2019 Sp18 AIB CkY Ckr ..l E11I.,E)ev AWn Emay LLC P.. pelrperwM Pea Palry . I]uR Kplmm F 9!515 5 3%30 S 9455. b 3,58]40 b 185 s' 6 691m S 8688] 3 fi+34051 S 1061122 4 17 ,11,,0) S 5722602 2011 234 Me 9124 1]14 234 2034 30217 2024 426 6.192W f 014 5 a'. ! 014 L 14393069 3 014 $ 5S)%803 014 ! tl,90p5 04 5 S2o503 014 b 7,935.35 3 014 5 216,37120 3 014 S 358]0].20 5 0 I 5 6d,9O440 £ 014 { 3 Wm S 866% 5 20.016]0 5 ]13505 E 16%37 3 ]370 5 110054 $ 398139] 5 .51901 3 8,087]61 3 121.23733 010 $ 015 $ 016 S 016 S 016 S 016 S D15 5 016 f 016 3 016 3 ! 1335! S 123M 3 2,85081 f ?]15117 ! 23000 5 103.6] S 15651 ! 4,3]342 f ]0)414 f 119003 f 174]046 016 b 0.18 3 Ole 5 010 9 010 S 0 l ! 016 E 010 5 Of6 § 018 S S 13384 f 1238! S 305961 S 4115117 S 2Y 00 b 1.57 S 15851 E 93)342 $ ],0]414 8 1,3%.. S 1747046 015 5 015 5 "1 5 0.18 5 019 $ 010 6 019 f 0.19 S Olb 3 019 3 3 6183 5 6151 5 142901 5 55]5] f ry9W 6 52M 3 7825 5 2.46]1 5 353]0] $ 6a90a 3 873513 020 f OA b OA S OA S 020 3 0.20 E 020 E OA $ OA b 0.20 5 5 6103 3 6192 3 1.4291 5 55]5] S 11907 b 5381 I )925 t 71 Pion 5 453]0] { 04904 $ 8.73523 S 195]37 4%]60 43.89]21 16R)d 39037 ?570M 2TI50 65371. 106,tR 16 194]133 38104.91 POA 304 2020 204 Cate. L -e Enemwg Palkl Reauon AG 5 333109 3 420.99 S 101] 35 E 318119 5 1]0!643 1038 425 Ata 3035 21." 1 ell $ 805095 $ 014 $ 1n 49]x0 b 014 S 4798740 F 0117 5 5 378101 f %1. 5 2414966 ! 684126 3 3553453 016 5 016 5 016 f Otfi S 5 Sg014 ! 13]3] { 144085 f 94961 S 1071 M 010 S 018 $ 010 5 016 S 3 40.14 S 13337 3 3.1995 8 94881 S 3.0]]00 019 S all 3 019 f 019 S 3 2]00] ! 6869 b 1]2420 E 17400 S 2530. 020 3 B.A S O.A 5 01 5 S 71007 ! 66.89 S 1191% 5 4]4 83 S 253854 3 610316 1.039.5] $1.]4626 1424412 215813 431 431 2021 303 2011 Browriee 91wre Raklm I.. TMmm S 1TJ35 f 4]5.89 i 0590 f 177M475.P $ 11] 08 S 20)84 AM AA MOO 2016 AA 2.537 { OH E E,QG855 $ 014 3 6.878" S 014 5 6�IS 5 014 S 4%955 S 0.14 f S 3`437 5 %160 $ %160 5 %t 60 ! %160 5 Meen 016 3 016 S 016 3 016 5 016 F 3 SBW $ 1373] 5 1]]]] S 13]37 S "137 3 well Of8 E Oto f Ote 3 016 3 0 S 3 590] S fA 31 3 1313] $ 13)3] 3 13)3] b .1. 019 5 010 5 014 5 018 S - 018 5 $ 3500 S 6860 S 6668 S 661 S 6869 5 2%]4 OA 3 OA S OA 3 020 3 0.20 3 b 2500 5 68% S 68.86 ! 6869 S 6669 5 280.74 $ 75037 2050.5] 20605] 2%657 2,0505 6,9238 =2 = =2 =2 3023 X22 X32 2032 OWL, Gknn GIail ER61i Mlcn0 PI. Yana Ranco Wlkyl- 1 646600 3 7"08 b ]84.08 3 3512% S 51361 5 7]S. b 20b01 5 510438 S 21.7611 2M] 1017 2027 209 i.] 2027 X2 1.] 4751440 E 014 5 6531 5 014 $ 6534 3 014 $ 1115136 S 014 f ].3%90 3 014 S 634020 b 014 5 149840 5 014 3 010111 S 014 f 5 4165202 ! 914 76 S 914 ?a 5 1561190 E 1µi$.5] £ 00763 f 2.3)830 E 11,34303 3 ]17,]]8. 0.16 f 016 3 0.16 E 016 3 016 3 016 5 016 3 OM 5 S 5.8929 ! 1Mae f 1260 S 2,23C 27 3 1091 S 126W S J39i] 5 1,62043 S 1067686 010 $ 0.18 5 0.16 E 010 5 016 2 016 3 O1B S Ota 5 S 6002 3 1260 5 13066 3 2342] 3 14794 1 12660 f ]R>] S 1.82043 S 1067680 019 $ 119 3 019 3 019 5 019 S 015 $ Ote 5 019 S 5 291514 3 6534 S 8539 S 111310 S )38] S 63. 5 199 f 81022 3 533843 OA f pA $ ON $ OA S OA S 020 3 OA 3 020 S 5 20]514 5 65317 5 as. f 1115117 5 739] 5 63. 5 16880 S 61022 ! 53]3.43 3 89,25431 1,06020 4%OA 33454.1 22190) 1 al 508652 2411. 11.14" 8R3 2023 Pn9at vle.10, AIW We.,r R. -.la. I. -8m1 S 1,16.31 3 7.111 1 14.361.21 w. =a 3190 108937 $ Otq b 1524690 S 10.33560 S 014 5 15,15.98 $ S %.55290 iolal p; year 1 28734.16 S S 1A96A3338 2019.2m, 0.16 5 31781 5 0.16 ! 216.71 $ 3 1354 ]1 S 38.16869 f 91,286,416.26 A2LA30 018 3 21700 S 016 b 218671 f 1 411.)1 f Mae" $ 61A".359V ]OM -1.] 019 S l,9BW 5 019 S 109330 S S 2,1823 S 18999 3 S1,872.0,7011.1822.10 30.34238 020 $ tMW 4 3267000 ON S 1,9336 S 32,8006 S 31623 1 854]09 $ 19pµ30 f ].11,L1.81 2050-261 35mawle .. MODerele Ia. e rN a Elemm�i 216 M1roum A�,n�ame�nA6�^ Yee ¢ Bea`. 2V199M :Ox9.xOs3 =303p::wo 6eyp.nm 20`A.3w3 Apdb,M un bey0n6 USSI , } 2025 Owe CIM 3 11575 2021 6.192.00 S 014 3 B66.B0 $ 0.15 S 6192 5 0.16 S 6192 S 0,17 S 6192 S 018 § 6192 S1,336.10 2010 C.. Ro4N S 3. SO =4 6.192 S 0.14 3 B839B 8 015 S 6192 $ 016 S fiI n S 0,17 S 61.92 $ 0.18 3 6193 S 2019 HIe..9 D., AUN S 9{55.03 2021 142,990,69 S 0.14 5 20.01910 3 0,15 $ 1.42991 $ 0.16 $ 192891 S 0,17 S 1429,91 S 0.10 $ 112.91 3 1 YJB10 25}8811 3019 Emery LLC 3 3 2024 55.7%% S 011 3 7SWAS 9 0.15 $ 55].5] $ 016 S SSi3] S 017 { S52S7 S Ole S 55].57 S 2018 16S,56716 RehYlernlim 3 ]85.5] 2025 11.0005 0.14 S 1.666.00 S 0.15 3 11800 $ 0.16 S 11900 S 0.12 $ 119.0 S 0.18 S 1 51 .3w 3019 Ppk 3 62402 2021 5,20330 S 0,14 3 )3880 3 0.15 $ $283 $ 0.16 S We, 3 0.17 S 52,& $ 119W S 2?N.060 218 Psq S 8860] 2024 ).92535 3 0.14 $ 1109.51 3 0.15 $ 7825 S 015 3 79.25 $ 0.17 $ 79.25 $ 0.10 S 5283 S 1.022 2019 DNR 526,21054 2024 318,871.20 3 0.14 $ 3061397 S 0.15 3 2186.)1 3 0.16 3 21!6.71 1 017 3 2.1 C4.)1 S 0.18 3 010 )825 $ 1.585.05 2019 ONR 510,61103 2024 353.]012 $ 0,14 $ 49.519.01 3 01! $ 3.537.0] $ 016 3 35370] S 0.17 S 353707 $ S 0.14 S 2156]1 S 13.72424 2019 Me. 3 U1904 2021 6197160 S 0.14 3 e.M 62 $ 015 3 69901 $ 016 5 616.97 3 017 S 64904 3 0.18 S 3,53]97 $ 70,741I1 35].26.82 3 1223732 3 9,2523 8 8]352 S 6,]35.23 ! OI8.01 S 6,7352 6 1270086 1]1,197741 2020 Cernne S 3,32168 2025 2],00].2 3 0.14 S 3)8121 $ 015 S 270.7 3 0.16 3 27007 S 017 $ V007 $ 0.16 S 2020 U.- S 17589 2025 B,W,55 3 0.14 $ "I W $ 0,15 S 6669 3 016 $ 6869 S 012 S .159 3 018 2]00] 6 5.101 Al 2020 EIIma0w9 P111e1 510,367.5 225 122,182603 014 3 24.1400 S 015 S 1721.96 $ 016 $ 1,]2197 S 017 S 1 7249 $ 6 0.18 6869 6 1,J)3T 2020 N - NI $ 3,161.19 2026 016010 3 014 $ 6.617.26 S 015 S 411 GO S 0.16 S 47160 5 0.17 S 0460 5 5 17219: S 31,199.51 !1],016.12 6 35.539.53 $ ?539.0 i 2S3nu 013 Y O4.p0 S 849908 4 2.5254 S 2.53659 S 5077075 2021 &-g- S 17325 226 74597 $ 011 S 35000 3 015 $ 25.97 1` 0,16 S 25.00 3 0.17 4 2.00 8 016 $ 2500 S 221 221 9bmn 3 47599 202 6,068.55 $ 0.11 3 "In S 0.15 5 68. S 016 S SON 6 0.17 $ 68.68 S 018 $ "SO 6 SW20 113]3.)1 221 R.14H $ken $ 0599 202 6660.55 3 0.19 5 %160 5 0.15 3 BB. 5 016 5 6869 $ 0.17 S 6869 3 01$ $ 6768 5 1273.71 2021 5 0589 202 8066.55 S 0.14 5 96160 3 015 S 6969 3 018 S 8088 S 0.1] S 8959 S 0.19 $ 00 S 1.373.71 Th.. 3 12].06 226 625.55 3 011 3 96160 S 015 5 8869 5 016 $ ".so 3 0.17 $ 89.97 3 010 $ 680 6 137171 6 1.070.30 3 4.176,38 $ 29911 $ 24871 S 288.74 S 29974 $ 5,044.44 202 cm $ 9456.0 227 297,51440 $ 014 $ 41,05203 3 015 $ 297511 1 0.16 S 2.975.11 5 0.17 S 2.975.14 S 0.18 S 2975.14 3 59502.08 2022 22 CU. $ iG,O 2m 6,534 $ 0.11 3 914.78 S 0.15 $ 65.24 3 0.16 3 65U $ 0.17 $ 0m 3 0.10 S as $ "MAO 22 04. ERM $ 7"0 3027 65. $ 0.14 3 91476 3 0.15 $ 55.31 $ 018 S Wu 3 Ot] S 0 I 6 0.16 $ 65.34 S 1,39760 222 muka 5 3.61260 227 1115136 5 QA4 S 1561]90 5 015 S 1.115.14 $ 016 S 1,115.14 $ 0.17 5 1.115.14 $ 0.18 S 1.11514 5 22,303.71 2022 IS. $ 51261 2027 ],396.90 5 0.11 S 1.035.53 $ 0,15 S 7391 $ 016 $ 7907 S 017 S 1397 $ 016 $ 7397 S 1,0033 202 Sen. R.- $ 772.89 3 2027 6.140.20 3 0.14 $ 987.63 3 0.15 3 6340 S 0.16 S 6310 S 017 S 8310 1 0,16 $ 6310 $ 1,2601 2022 V 1Ny Fen. 3.07461 2027 18,88:40 $ 0.14 $ 2,378.38 S 0.15 3 inn 3 016 $ 16960 $ 017 5 16885 S 010 S 16868 3 3,3970 $ 51".36 267 $1.02160 S 0.14 $ 11,34322 S 013 { $102 S 016 S 6,012 S 017 5 6102 S 0d0 $ 01022 S 3219]5.11 $ ]4]36.03 $ 5.33843 3 533613 3 53]6.43 3 5,33$.13 S I6,NN 32 106,2663 223 N1P. uk.Mpe, 3 7,1"27 =a IDBBW 9 0.14 S 8246.97 5 015 3 WSW § 0.16 $ 1,"900 $ 017 S 197900 5 010 5 223 MOMsakalaa6e $ 7.19491 2976 109 115 $ 014 $ 15.397.56 $ 015 S 129336 3 0.16 3 1,073.35 3 017 $ 1293% 3 0.10 S 1MOD $ 1,093M 21,700.0 $142121 6 30.55296 3 2162$ $ 211256 5 S 21.667,12 T°1'1. { 23}]0.16 3 16.24." 3 18691.0 $ 218235 196".50 S 216235 3 43.69]12 Ren.-. ,Im. tea3476.6 $16B6A2.26 {1,1WAM,36 S113MA16.2 Sl}61A0].79 3 18.971130 M19-202 3931238 1021-1"] Z"4 -SO2 3162],]6932 {6,18266139 M2.ZN3 36 yu 0197 Low Icavu �4 ' 6ax ( 4'711:10^ }0 4]dndN' } 01 wlunnG 3019 AIB 2019 MIS AIB 3019 2019 MIS 2019 2019 6411 3 44515 CIetl. ROMM1 3 3%.30 E. -.,p )wln$ 9.45503 Enwr9 LLC S 3,36140 MYIer RMpe- S 70557 Pew E 6%07 Palry 5 ..BJ pJR 5'16.Sn CNR $ 1001137 RXrtam 5 47181. 3 5733662 2024 9044 2024 2024 M24 2924 2034 3Q4 2024 =4 6193W 3 014 1 6,1U1 S 014 3 112,02065 2 0.14 3 MISS so S 0]4 1 I'm$ aIN b S.A3W f 0.14 5 ].915.25 S 011 S 218,6711. S 4.14 I 353]07.29 E 014 f 61,90840 5 Oto 5 S met $ 066.09 S 30,010]4 3 1.025.95 $ 1.6M.W S 13669 5 1000 ba 6 30.61383 E 4051901 E 900663 S 1R 39323 014 f - 014 3 - 014 5 - 0.14 f 014 5 014 3 Oto S 014 S 014 $ - 029 3 S $ S S $ S ] 5 3 $ 6 015 S 015 5 015 £ 015 S 015 ] 015 f O.t5 S Ot5 S 013 { 015 £ { el. $ E19} E 1,42991 $ 551,51 S 119. 5 5283 f )025 $ 21%)1 $ 353707 $ 649.02 3 0)ss ei 0.15 £ - 015 S 015 $ 013 5 0.15 5 - 015 3 0.15 F 015 $ 01E E 0.15 f y - 3 3 5 $ S S 5 6 { 5 0.16 E 0It $ 016 S 016 S OIF S OIE E 016 5 0IS 5 DIS 9 016 S b 61.9] f 6193 S 1,428.91 S M757 f t19ro f II6a S 7925 $ 218371 5 7.5370] E O490a { 8733.23 f 61024 619" 142161.07 5,575.86 1,19002 520]5 ]8352 2186712 353)0]2 84004a 61,35250 3030 2030 ISM X20 me Eererra Lleenow Elkr W, Papel Precuun AG IDw{w f 3321119 5 47502 $ 1008).3$ S 3181.18 $ 4TJ.W f 103335) 2035 MIS .,M }025 X05 37031205 014 S 605955 S pt4 f In.11SO 1 014 5 4,40240 5 014 3 4.85635 3 0.14 6 3 379101 1 %t 60 5 2410866 E 6"726 3 %t W $ 35.50113 014 S - OI4 I 014 S OI4 3 - 014 5 B - f 3 f S $ 015 S Ot5 3 013 3 015 S 015 5 s 21007 E 0869 3 IR<BB S O4.W S 3568 £ ] X23 015 b 016 E 0.15 f � 015 4 015 $ s $ $ E S E 016 S 016 S 016 S 016 S 016 3 E SM 07 3 6069 f 1]24.% S 47480 b 66.66 5 260722 s 2.700n "W SO 6%.85 24976 47480 0%M xfi,onis 2021 2021 2021 2921 8rcvnik< Mme AM." 6ban 5 41595 6 9]5 99 3 47502 6 47599 5 1,60132 1.36 3CM 2926 MW 3.500 S 014 $ 6.%555 5 014Ot4 6.81..55 5 014 3 6. SmM 5 019 3 5 35002 1 Se IO S %102 $ 3.2N 74 014 5 - 4 014 5 � 014 3 S $ E b E 0.15 3 015 1 0.15 3 015 3 1 35M $ 6066 S Btl 69 ] BB6B $ 211. 015 $ 015 S 015 E Ot5 { S - S £ E 016 $ 016 S 016 S OfE f S FW 3 Mol f 6069 $ 6865 F 23106 $ 35002 Sm. BM.B6 Sm 86 69.% 2,31061 2022 2022 2423 =2 2932 2022 202] 3023 CWL, G'aM GIaOn ERM, ... 'm" Enna Rgnro Veuty Fmce b 0402.03 S INN E )"W 3 3512. S 51261 S -)7235 E 2,0861 3 5104.36 S 3191511 1.27 202) 203) 2021 2031 X27 2027 M27 29),314401 0.14 f 6,534 f Oto y 6534E 014 $ 11,51365 014 S 7. Sm 90 3 014 $ 674029 5 0.14 S 16,MB40 E 014 S 4102,60 S 014 $ b 41 N2 6 91476 S 914 76 S 11,611 p2 E 1,W55) $ 60763 5 2.37030 5 11,34302 $ 7413803 0.14 1 - O.t4 5 0 1 5 - 0q S 014 T 0.14 S 0,4 5 014 $ 5 $ 6 E $ 3 $ E 015 E 015 S 015 1 0.15 5 O1$ S 0.13 3 015 S 015 £ 1 297514 S 65% I 6534 b 1,11514 $ 7387 5 6340 5 169b S 41022 1 53ta0 015 1 015 E � 015 $ 015 $ - p.IS S 015 f - 015 S 015 5 5 f { $ 5 $ f 5 f 016 1 OIE 6 O.1B b Oto f 016 b 016 1 016 S Oti 3 5 287514 1 0534 3 elm E 111514 S 73.91 a 0340 5 fE909 E BID23 f 5.338.43 f IS7144 65340 'tl 0 1115134 JA 66 634@ 1026-04 0.103.16 E:1w 34 2033 MM NrOan NNI elare8e 3 7N 27 64ry6 cak at -"p b 7. 94.91 3 1436, ]t Mwnue lorTw Aar 9111.4 2021 =6 Tsai 11.,020 $ 01a T 15246.00 b 102293560S 0.14 $ 1531..66 3 3 30,552.1. S 167,120.16 3M19420336 1.1930]3 014 6 0 1 5 � S f1W5p330 2M4NI2I b 6 015 S I'M SO $ O1$ $ I. S f 7.18]1. S 190..x 11,190.9"16 2029.20]] 015 $ 015 1 i f 31134,9..>B 2024.1.1. 5 f 016 E 10201. 5 10802.00 41E b l.. S 1093356 5 2.182% E 31,841. f 18.094.30 $1.216.416.25 1 5.0.59 ,3533] SfV9304] 36Aw rewnw ELN Expense forecast 2019-2043 Expense description 2019.2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039-2043 Pavement maintenance $ 300,000 $ 312,000.00 $ 324,480 $ 337,459.20 $350,957.57 Grant obligations $ 500,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ _ $ - Salaries $ 1,000,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 1,040,400 $ 1,061,208 $ 1,082,432 Operating $ 250,000 $ 257,500 $ 265,225 $ 273,182 $ 281,377 Engineering/planning $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Miscellaneous $ 250,000 $ 255,000 $ 260,100 $ 265,302 $ 270,608 Total estimated expense $ 2,550,000 $ 2,394,500 $ 2,140,205 $ 2,187,151 $ 2,235,375 Total for the 25 year planning period $11,507,231 2019-2024 Revenue Aggressive Revenue $ 7,100,382 Deficient $ (4,406,849) Moderate Revenue $ 6,432,081 Deficient $ (5,075,150) Low Revenue $ 5,859,252 Deficient $ (5,647,979) KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: January 14, 2019 TOPIC: Paths and Trails Funding ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff Evaluate Third Party Access Easements LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: Direct the County Surveyor to evaluate the specifics associated with receiving third party access easements supporting the "Towns to Teanaway" initiative. BRIEFING SUMMARY: • Recently, representatives from the "Towns to Teanaway" group visited the Board of County Commissioners presenting an easement proposal to the Board • Public Works (PW) was requested to investigate "Paths and Trails" funding options and to report back to the Board BACKGROUND: The outcome of the recent presentation from "Towns to Teanaway" is an appeal to the County to accept and hold easements of access across several private property owners in Upper County. While it appears that the County is not precluded from accepting the identified easements, several questions remain — specifically the County's ability to expense road funds in the effort. On 01/04/2019, PW sent the Board the complete Revised Code of Washington Chapter 47.30 for review. DISCUSSION: Based on RC W 47.30, our 2019 budget; it appears that our minimum required expenditure (Paths and Trails) is approximately $9,000. A quick read of 47.30 suggests to staff there is likely no funding limitation imposed on Paths and Trails expenditures — other than 2019 budget restrictions. During the presentation on 01/04/2019; PW staff erroneously suggested that additional reporting requirements are tied to Paths and Trails expenditures. This appears to be inaccurate and current required reporting through the County Road Administration Board is sufficient relative to Paths and Trails reporting. It now seems prudent to request the County Surveyor contact representatives from "Towns to Teanaway" discussing specific easement details. Once PW defines the specific easement requirements supporting the request, we will return to the Board discussing implementation potential and process. Page 1 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT FISCAL IMPACTS: A minimum expense of approximately $9,000 from the road fund is required in fiscal 2019. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Trail Maps Page 2 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 1: TRAIL MAPS Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT n ,fpp J� a m