The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-12-10-minutes-public-works-study-sessionKITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Public Works Study Session Regular Meeting Monday December 10, 2018 - 7:30 PM Commissioners' Auditorium 205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg 1. Call to Order 2. Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing Chair Signature on KPFF Task Order No. 16 Supplement No. 1 - Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement 3. Lanigan Springs Public Right of Way Establishment 4. Proposed Vacation of Micheletto Road 5. Other business 6. Adjourn Created on 12/7/2018 8:22:21 AM KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION MINUTES COMMISSIONERS' AUDITORIUM, 205 WEST 5TH ROOM 109 - ELLENSBURG Regular Meeting MONDAY 1:30 PM DECEMBER 10, 2018 Board members present: Chairman Laura Osiadacz; Vice -Chairman Obie O'Brien; Commissioner Cory Wright Others: Justin Turnbull, Candie Leader, Public Works At 1:35 pm Vice --Chairman O'Brien opened the Public Works Study Session. No additional agenda items were added. REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHAIR SIGNATURE ON KPFF TASK ORDER NO. 16 SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 - BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Justin Turnbull presented the Resolution for consideration. Justin Turnbull stated that this supplement is for additional support services due to Engineering Services Manager, Sara Folk leaving employment. Discussion was held. Commissioner Wright made a motion to approve Resolution 2018-203 Authorizing Chair Signature on KPFF Task Order No. 16 Supplement No. 1 - Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement. Vice -Chairman O'Brien seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-0. LANIGAN SPRINGS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ESTABLISHMENT Justin Turnbull gave background on the road issues in Lanigan Springs explaining that the roadway parcels were in tax title after the developer defaulted on tax payments. Justin Turnbull stated that staff is now asking for direction forward to get the right of way established now that Public Works owns the parcels. Discussion was held. Vice -Chairman O'Brien made a motion to direct staff to prepare enabling documentation to get the right of way established. Commissioner Wright seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-0. PROPOSED VACATION OF MICHELETTO ROAD Justin Turnbull stated that property owners at the end of Micheletto Road have gated the roadway so Public Works maintenance vehicles can no longer turn around while performing maintenance tasks. Justin Turnbull added that it is understood by staff that the property.owners no longer desire Public Works maintenance support. Discussion was held. Vice -Chairman O'Brien made a motion directing staff to prepare enabling documents to set a Public Hearing for January 15, 2019 at 2pm to consider the Vacation of Micheletto Road_ Commissioner Wright seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-0. 2018-12-10 MINUTES Meeting adjourned at 1:48 pm. 2018-12-10 MINUTES KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Laura Osiadacz, Chairman BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2018 -,9D3 AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON KPFF TASK ORDER NO. 16 SUPPLEMENT NO. 1— BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WHEREAS: Public Works selected KPFF as a structural design firm following a prescribed procurement process in 2016; and WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners approved KPFF Task Order No. 16 with Resolution 2018-160 on October 2, 2018; and WHEREAS: Recent resignation of the Engineering Services Manager reduces Public Works design capacity supporting Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement; and WHEREAS: KPFF is offering to offset the County's obligation to provide civil and roadway design in the project; and WHEREAS: The cost of additional KPFF project design support is $35,000 bringing a new task order price (not to exceed) to $208,000; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of county Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's Signature on KPFF Task Order No. 16 Supplement No. 1 in the amount of $35,000 bringing the total task order price (not to exceed) to $208,000. DATED this 10th day of December, 2018, at Ellensburg, Washington. Attest: *A,ofrt�e Board- .luiie Kjorsvik com,.- ,�c'� •,...... eputy ala : the Board- Mandy Buchholz s c �''++rrrrrrrutirtt`�� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY. WASHINGTON Obie O'Brien, Vice -Chairman Cory Wright, Commissioner 1601 nfth Avenue. Suite 1600 Seattle. WA 98101 206.622.5822 kpff.com isif November 28, 2018 Mark Cook, PE M titas County Public Works 411 North Ruby, Suite 1 Ellensburg, WA 98928 Subject: Kittkas County On -Call Agreement KCPW 2017-19ENG2 Supplement #1 for Task Order 16 Dear Mark: This letter addresses the scope and fee for additional scope work discussed between the County and KPFF conforming to the project goals and final development of the PS&E contract documents and construction support. The new scope items are civil and roadway engineering described in Task 6 in the revised scope of work document that is attached Pursuant to accomplishing this additional work, we request an additional budget of $35,000, bringing our total not -to -exceed amount for this Task Order to $208,000. A breakdown of the additional fee for Task 6 is attached. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (208) 926-0442. �GA9Cp9ErR ...'1b �iP e _ � K17TUAS COUNTY KXr=XWJk95 CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Formal Task Order Document KPFF Task Order Number 016 Maximum Amount Payable $2089000 Completion Date 12/30/2019 The general provisions and clauses of Local Agency Agreement Number (KCPW 2017- 19ENG2) shall be in full force and effect for this Task Order. Location of Project: Kittitas County Project Title: Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement Description of Work: KPFF will prepare the PS&E documents for the replacement of the Big Boulder Creek Bridge in coordination with Kittitas County staff. The design team includes: KPFF — Project Management, Structural and Civil Engineering Hart Crowser — Geotechnical Engineering Watershed Science and Engineering — Hydraulic Engineering Jacobs — Environmental/Permitting Tentative Project Advertisement is April 2019, but will be dependent on permitting, fish windows, and bridge procurement schedules. The existing timber bridge is located on Cle Elum Valley Road over Big Boulder Creek approximately three miles north of the Salmon La Sac Campground. The bridge is currently posted for a 5 Ton weight limit due to scour at the timber sill foundation. The County prefers to replace the bridge with a single lane prefabricated superstructure. TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT KPFF will manage the development of the PLANS, SPECS & ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE (PS&E) in such a manner to ensure the County is able to achieve the desirable bidding date. This effort will include appropriate in-house duties such as invoicing, contract DFS ... 7p QFC HZT'rIT1FLS CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS KITTITAS CO"TY compliance assurance, file and staff organization, client communications (emails and telephone), and general project oversight. Project Management tasks include: 1.1 Project Team Management and Coordination 1.2 Monthly Progress Reports/Invoices (Assume 8) 1.3 Monthly Project Progress Meetings/Minutes (Assume 8 meetings, held via teleconference) 1.4 Coordination with WDFW (Assume 8 hours) 1.5 Management Reserve - allocation of the reserve funds for additional out of scope tasks based on written approval of the County TASK 2 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING KPFF shall perform the structural engineering analysis and design of the Big Boulder Creek Bridge substructure. KPFF shall perform appropriate analysis and design calculations in accordance with the most current edition (at the time of NTP) of the WSDOT Bridge Design Manual (BDM) and the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, and the Local Agency Guidelines. Considering the location and use of the bridge, alternative criteria, such as Forest Service guidelines, may be considered to reduce construction costs. TASK 2.1— Project Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit A project kickoff meeting will be held at the existing bridge site. TASK 2.2 — Alternative Analysis Memo Brief memo to summarize site constraints, design criteria and preferred bridge structure TASK 2.3 — Development of PS&ElContract Bid Documents TASK 2.31— Plan and Calculation Preparation • Project Cover Sheet • General Notes and Quantities • Bridge Layout - plan and elevation • Structural notes • Foundation Plan — Layout • Foundation Design and Details • Wingwall Layout/Details 5CAnss ... ro c � KirnTAS MUNTY 3HCX=XTAB CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TASK 2.32 — Structural Special Provisions TASK 2.33 — Cost Estimate TASK 2.34 — Deliverable preparation TASK 2.40 — Quality Control Checks and Reviews TASK 2.50 — Technical Collaboration Structural design engineers will coordinate with survey, civil, geotechnical, hydraulics and environmental engineers for project design and contract coordination. TASK 2.60 — Construction Support If needed to provide support during construction to respond to RFI's and review submittals. TASK 3 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TASK 3.10 — Planning and Research Hart Crowser will review readily available geologic maps and water well logs that cover the site vicinity, and other reports and plans provided by others (if any) for general information regarding subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and geologic hazards. Hart Crowser will coordinate field explorations with KPFF, Kittitas County, USFS, drilling subcontractors, and internal staff. If required, Hart Crowser will submit a traffic control plan for review by the County. TASK 3.20 — Field Work TASK 3.21— Site Reconnaissance and Utility Locates Hart Crowser will conduct a reconnaissance to get familiarized with the site. Relevant features will be noted, and the proposed exploration location marked for the utility locators. Hart Crowser will notify "One -Call" service for public utility locates. TASK 3.22 — Field Explorations Hart Crowser will advance one boring near the south side of the bridge. (The north side of the bridge cannot be accessed with drilling equipment due to load restrictions.) The To 7Hg KITTITAS COUNTY KZTTZTKF3 CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS boring will be advanced using a TSi 150CC Sonic Drill, which can typically penetrate through boulders and similar materials. The boring will be advanced until one of the following criteria is reached: 1) the boring penetrates 10 feet into rock, 2) refusal occurs within nested boulders, or 3) we reach a depth of 50 feet. If thick soil layers (sand, gravel, etc.) are encountered, then occasional soil samples will be obtained by driving split -spoon samplers in accordance with the standard penetration test (SPT) procedure (American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM] D 1586). Hart Crowser will observe the exploration, log the subsurface conditions, collect representative soil and rock samples, and transport the samples to the laboratory for further visual evaluation and testing. The borehole will be backfilled in accordance with Department of Ecology regulations. The upper 1 foot of the borehole will be patched with gravel surfacing. Excess spoils from the borehole will be spread on the ground adjacent to the borehole. If required, Hart Crowser's subcontractors will provide traffic control services during drilling. TASK 3.23 — Sample Review and Laboratory Testing Soil and rock samples obtained from the explorations will be visually classified in the field by Hart Crowser and in Hart Crowser's geotechnical laboratory based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM classification methods. Hart Crowser will conduct a series of geotechnical laboratory tests on selected soil and bedrock samples obtained from the explorations to evaluate the engineering and index properties of the site soils. The specific tests conducted will depend upon actual conditions encountered. For budgeting purposes, Hart Crowser has assumed the tests will include up to eight moisture content determinations, one Atterberg limits determination, three grain -size distribution tests, and one unconfined compressive test. TASK 3.30 — Office Work TASK 3.31 —Engineering Analysis and Consultations Hart Crowser will conduct engineering analyses to evaluate seismic hazards, ground settlement, abutment stability, foundation and retaining wall alternatives and design parameters, and earthwork guidelines. Engineering analysis will be completed in general conformance with appropriate Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) design manuals. ° � KZTTZTgiB CO Mo DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IaTMAS Hart Crowser will consult with the design team regarding their findings and foundation alternatives. TASK 3.32 — Geotechnical Reporting Hart Crowser will prepare a geotechnical report to document their findings and recommendations. The geotechnical report will address design and construction issues, including: • Site and boring location plan(s); • Description of subsurface soil, rock, and groundwater conditions; • Site preparation and earthwork recommendations; • Seismic hazards and WSDOT-based seismic design parameters; • Temporary and permanent abutment foundation alternatives, design recommendations, and stability; • Retaining wall alternatives and design parameters; and • Construction considerations. A draft report will be provided to the design team for review and comments. A final report will be prepared that addresses review comments from the design team. TASK 3.33 — Project Management and Meetings Hart Crowser will provide geotechnical project management and support services, including coordinating staff and subcontractors and conducting telephone consultations and email communications with the design team. Hart Crowser will attend up to one meeting at KPFF's office. TASK 3.40 — Construction Support The geotechnical engineer will provide support during construction to respond to RFI's or changes in field conditions. TASK 4 HYDRAULIC DESIGN Watershed Science & Engineering (WSE) will provide hydraulic engineering services for the Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement Project in Kittitas County, Washington. WSE will lead the hydraulic engineering portions of the project which will include completing the following tasks. TASK 4.10 — Data Collection and Review WSE will collect and review existing data and information needed to complete the hydraulic investigation. Data will include but not be limited to topographic maps including LiDAR data, DES To �r U KITT rAS COi7N'fY 3kKIT'rITgF.3 Co DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS historical aerial photos, flood data, bridge maintenance records, and anecdotal information on past flood events from County maintenance staff. Assumptions: • County will supply relevant data they possess TASK 4.20 — Site Inspection WSE will conduct a one -day field inspection to examine the crossing and Big Boulder Creek. WSE will examine hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics, sediment transport, debris flow potential, lateral erosion, and scour. Assumptions: • NTP is received in time to allow WSE to visit the site before snow fall. TASK 4.30 — Channel Survey WSE will survey up to eight cross sections and a longitudinal profile of the stream channel as part of the site inspection task above. WSE will merge the stream channel data with the County's survey to develop a single topographic base map required for the hydraulic investigation. Assum tip ons: 0 County will or has collected detailed topographic data within the road right-of-way. TASK 4.40 — HydroIogy WSE will use USGS regional regression equations to estimate annual instantaneous peak design flow rates. The design event for flow and scour will be the 100 -year flood and the check flood for potential damage will be the 500 -year event. The 500 -year event is not the design event, it is solely used to assess risk in -order to identify any remaining significant erosion or scour issues that might need to be addressed in the design. Assum tions: • USGS regression equations will provide reasonable estimates for the 100 -year and 500 - year annual instantaneous peak flows. If they do not, WSE will use alternative methods to estimate the flows. TASK 4.50 — Hydraulic Analysis WSE will develop a simple HEC -RAS model of Big Boulder Creek in the vicinity of the bridge crossing using topographic base map. The model will not be calibrated because observed co�Q�Pscnoss...ror�c�°�i K17"17TA8 COIMTY KZTTZTg43 4C4:bTJWWW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS dischargelhighwater marks are not available. Instead, WSE will use engineering judgment to select and adjust model parameters. The model will be used to help size the bridge waterway, to provide data required to evaluate lateral erosion and scour potential, and to develop countermeasures. TASK 4.60 — Channel Stability and Scour Assessment WSE will determine if lateral erosion, local scour, ice, or debris flows pose a threat to the proposed crossing. If they do, WSE will work with KPFF to address these hazards in the design. Assumptions: These hazards will be addressed through modifications the structure itself (e.g. deeper foundations, longer bridge, etc.) and not through design and installation of external countermeasures (e.g. riprap). If countermeasures are required, the optional task at the end of this scope will be completed. TASK 4.70 — WDFW and Permit Coordination It is anticipated that WDFW personnel have an idea of the length of crossing they would like to see at the site. WSE will work with WDFW personnel, the County, and Jacobs (the company that will acquire the project permits) to collectively arrive at a bridge length that is acceptable to all parties. An allowance is provided for WSE's lead engineer to participate in one meeting with WDFW personnel in'Ellensburg. Assumptions: • A reasonable bridge length will be agreed to that the County can afford to build. TASK 4.80 — Hydraulic Design Report WSE will prepare a hydraulic design report to summarize and document the results of the investigation. It will include the recommended NBIS Scour Code rating for the new structure, a code that the County will need for their records. Assumptions: A draft of the report will be provided to the County and KPFF for review. Upon receipt of comments, WSE will refine the report and submit a final version as a PDF_ TASK 4.40 — Meetings and Administration An allowance is provided for WSE personnel to attend one meeting at KPFF's Seattle office to discuss the design and one meeting in Ellensburg to meet with the County. �PP53 ... Tp 7P{g KITi'1TAS COUNTY IKITTITgIg CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Assumptions: • WSE will develop concept sketches of the countermeasures which will be provided to KPFF. KPFF will prepare detailed plans to be incorporated into the project plan set. • WSE will recommend specifications for the countermeasures. • WSE has included a modest cost for this task in the accompanying cost estimate. This estimate will be revisited and may need to be revised once the type and scale of countermeasures required are identified. • At this time it is assumed that scour and erosion protection countermeasures are not necessary and have not been included in the fee TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL/PERMITTING The Jacobs team will deliver Environmental Documentation and Permitting in coordination with KPFF and Kittitas County staff. TASK 5.10 — Project Management 1. Project planning, team direction and coordination and ongoing client communication 2. Project Controls a. Prepare monthly invoices and back-up, and monthly progress reports. b. Monitoring and updating Environmental delivery schedule. 3. Deliverables a. Monthly progress reports and invoices TASK 5.20 — Agency Coordination Agency Coordination a. Coordinate with Kittitas County Public Works, Kittitas County Community and Development Services, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Ecology, US Army Corps of Engineers, and other agencies as needed. b. Coordination items include impact analysis, permits required and timelines, and facilitated review of project milestones as needed. TASK 5.30 — NEPA/SEPA Documentation 1. NEPA/SEPA Documentation a. Research and prepare one (1) NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) form b. Research and prepare one (1) SEPA Checklist and Draft DNS if needed TASK 5.40 -- Biological Assessment 1. Biological Assessment a. Field Reviews b. Prepare one (1) Biological Assessment, assumed to be formal consultation with both Services. SCX�DES ... TO TyECOC KITTITAS COUNTY XKXWWXTg4S CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS c. Provide ongoing coordination with agencies throughout the review/approval process. TASK 5.50 — NHPA Section 106 1. NHPA Section 106 Evaluation a. Develop Area of Potential Effects (APE) and coordinate with SHPO. b. Evaluate cultural and historic resources within the project area of effect as per Section 106 requirements. TASK 5.60 — JARPA Package Preparation and Submittal 1. JARPA Preparation and Submittal a. Populate and submit one (1) DARPA application package. b. Coordination with federal and/or state agencies for the following permits: i. Corps 404 permit, United States Army Corps of Engineers (Assumes Nationwide Permit) ii. Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA), WA State Dept. of Fish & Wildlife iii. Ecology 401 permit review including development of TESC and SWPPP. TASK 5.70 — Local Permits or Approvals 1. Local Permits or Exemptions a. Coordinate with Kittitas County CDS on SEPA, Shorelines, and Critical Areas requirements. TASK 5.80 — Biology Support During Construction (OPTIONAL) 1. Support services during construction, including worksite isolation support, fish salvage and removal, planting or site stabilization guidance up to 40 hours. This task is not subject to Assumption la. Assumptions: • Coordination with FHWA or WSDOT Local Programs will not be required. • The Biological Assessment that will be prepared will be "Likely to Adversely Affect" for Bull Trout and Steelhead, and will require formal consultation with both USFWS and NMFS. • The US Army Corps of Engineers will issue a CWA Section 404 NWP 14. No individual permit will be required. • Section 106 will be determined as "May Affect", and will require SHPO concurrence • The Department of Ecology will issue a Letter of Verification for CWA Section 402. No individual permit will be required. • No wetlands will be impacted by the project. This Scope does not include wetland delineations or reporting. • No NPDES Permit will be required. • SEPA will be exempt. KITTITgB CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS KITTITA3 COUNTY • If the level of effort and cost for permit or approval acquisition is higher than the budget amount, Jacobs will coordinate with KPFF and the County to determine amendments as needed. • No mitigation planning is included in this scope of work. TASK 6 CIVIIJROADWAY ENGINEERING KPFF will provide civil engineering support for the replacement of Big Boulder Creek Bridge. Civil design criteria will be Kittitas County Code Chapter 12- Roads and Bridge Standards and as supplemented by the WSDOT Design Manual or AASHTO's Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets. TASK 6.1— Civil Project Management • Attend six (6) progress meetings via teleconference. • Prepare invoice progress reports TASK 6.2 — Development of PS&E/Contract Bid Documents Plan Preparation for 30%, 75%, 100% draft, 100% Ad 6 Site Preparation • Roadway plan and profile • Typical sections and details • Detour plan, profile and typical section • Full Closure Signage Plan Supporting Work. • Civil stream grading for stream bypass. • Prepare Stormwater Site plan and Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Civil Special Provisions • Provide WSDOT run list format civil technical special provisions Civil Cost Estimate • Provide quantities and unit prices for civil elements of work TASK 6.3 — Quality Control Checks and Reviews KPFF senior civil engineering staff will QC all civil design deliverables. CASCADES... 7p ec KITTTrAS covrvrs HZTTZTAfS CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TASK 6.40 — Construction Support If needed to provide support during construction to respond to RFPs and review submittals. Assumptions: • Existing ROW and survey basemap control provided by County will be depicted on civil drawings. Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) limits will be defined on Civil Site Preparation plan. Legal Descriptions of TCE's, including TCE documentation and acquisition will be performed by the County. O Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) plans will not be provided, a performance spec will be used for TESC. For Stormwater Management it is assumed the project is considered Road Preservation per SWMMEW Section 2.1.4 and therefore only needs to meet core requirement #1 and #2 as scoped above. Preparation of the Construction SWPPP will be a bid item and prepared by the Contractor. • Approach guardrail systems will not be required. Bridge railings will be signed with hazard object markers. �CA�APES TOC �G TASCOUNTY SZTTZTAB CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT DELIVERABLES: 1. Alternatives Analysis Memo (Draft and Final) 2. 30% Plan Set (Permit set. 3 sheets estimated. Layout, Elevation, Cross-section, structural notes, Cost Estimate) 3. 75% Plan Set (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, GSP run -list, 30% comment resolution) 4. 100% Draft Plans (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, PDF of GSP's or run -list and PSE files, pending final review by county, 75% comment resolution and complete PS&E) 5, 100% Stamped and Signed Plans (Contract Documents — bid ready) 6. Geotechnical report (Draft PDF and Final PDF + 3 hard copies) 7. One (1) NEPA CE and ECS Form 8. One (1) NHPA Section 106 Compliance Memo 9. One (1) Biological Assessment (Formal Consultation) 10. One (1) SEPA Checklist (Unless Exempt) 11. One (1) JARPA package for delivery to USACE, WDFW, and WDOE 12. Local Agency correspondence for each permit, approval, or exemption PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS: 1. COUNTY to provide KPFF with the project survey base map. County will collect additional data as necessary as requested by KPFF. Contours shall be in at least 2 foot increments and shall preferably extend at least 200 feet to the north, south, east and west of the proposed project limits to include all utilities, driveways, ditches, ROW/property lines and other items which are reasonably likely to impact the bridge layout and design. 2. KPFF to provide specifications related to the PS&E they develop (bridge portion only). 3. New bridge is assumed to be designed for one 12 foot lane, and two 2 foot shoulders and no sidewalks. 4. Bridge superstructure will have a 2% crown from the centerline of the roadway, or as prescribed by COUNTY Civil roadway design. 5. There will be no drains on the bridge. 6. Bridge superstructure is assumed to be prefabricated and designed and supplied by the Contractor during construction. 7. Load rating report will be provided by bridge superstructure supplier. 8. COUNTY will prepare Division 1 and assemble special provision package and bid package. elLr 4 _ ! 3Kr3rrlPALO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Rli �.�i.o wVa. Cost Breakdown: See Attached Project Schedule: KPFF will provide a PDF of the plans for the 30%, 75%, and 100% design at the dates shown below. For efficiency, the design will continue following milestone submittal while the county performs review of the submitted plans. The COUNTY will endeavor to complete and return to KPFF all comments as soon as possible following receipt of them, but in no case more than 10 business days following the submittal date. Milestone Milestone Description — Structural Description — Civil Delivery Date 30% 1 November Permit set: 3 sheets estimated. Permit set. Roadway plan 2018 Layout, Elevation, Cross- and profile and detour section, basic notes plan and profile. Typical sections. 75% January 2019 6-8 sheets, all items including 5-7 sheets, all items further development of the including further notes, specs, and quantities. development of the notes, specs, and quantities. 100 % Draft March 2019 6-8 sleets, all items developed 5-7 sheets, all items and ready for construction, developed and ready for pending final review by County. construeti=, Pence Complete PS&E. final review by County. Complete PS&E. 100% Stamped April 2019 Stamped and Signed Contract Stamped and Signed and Signed Documents — bid ready. Contract Documents — bid Mad . Completion Date: Decen_L __ .,....,., .. Agency Signature: Consultant Signature: Date: Date: t( Exhibit D-1 KPFF Consulting Engineers Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement Mttftas County On -Call Task Order #16: BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost Fixed Fee (FF) Classification Principal Project Manager Technical Specialist Structural Task Lead Project Engineer Design Engineer CAD Technician Project Coordinator Intern Admin Reimbursables Mileage Airfare Per Diem Subcontract (Blank) Subtotal Total 136.25% Negotiated 28.00% Direct Hourly Rate $ 64.91 $ 45.29 $ 64.91 $ 45.29 $ 43.27 $ 36.93 $ 46.04 $ 28.85 $ 22.00 $ 23.08 = $ 5,831.84 134.00 X $119.68 = $ Total X Negotiated Hours Hourly Rate - Cost 16.00 X $171.52 = $ 2,744.39 104.00 X $119.68 = $ 12,446.60 34.00 X $171.52 = $ 5,831.84 134.00 X $119.68 = $ 16, 036.96 144.00 X $114.34 = $ 16,465.10 208.00 X $97.59 = $ 20,298.21 234.00 X $121.66 = $ 28,468.60- 20.00 X $76.24 = $ 1,524.72 0.00 X $58.14 = $ - 0.00 X $60.99 = $ - 0.00 X $0.00 = $ 0.00 x $0.00 = $ - 0.00 X $0.00 = $ Subtotal $ 103,816.43 220 Miles x $0.545/mile) (Allowance) (Hotel + Meals $#.## x # trips) (Sub Name & Task) (Allowance) Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit E) Management Reserve $ 11990 $ 119.90 $88,160.24 $15,673 GRAND TOTAL: $207,7 November 28, 2018 KPFF Consulting Engineers KPFF Project BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Principal Manager Technical Structural Specialist Task Lead Project Engineer CAD Technician Protect Coordinator Hem SCOPE OF WORK $171.52 $119.68 $171.52 $119.68 $114.34 $121.66 $76.24 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.10 Project Team Management and Coordination 60 $7,181 1.20 Monthly Progress Reports/Invoices 8 12 $1.872 1.30 Monthly Project Progress Meetings/Minutes 16 6 $2.372 1.40 Coordination with WDFW 8 $957 Labor Subtotal: 0_�_ 92 0 0 o 0 _ 18 $12,883 _ $119.90 $15,673.00 2 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 2.10 Project Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit 6 6 $1 436 2.20 Alternative Analysis Memo 2 16 $2.258 2.30 Development of PS&E/Contract Bid Documents 2.31 Plan and Calculation Preparation Cover Sheet 2 2 6 $1198 General Notes, Quantities, 2 4 4 20 $3.712 Bridge Layout - plan and elevation 4 20 8 20 $6,428 Foundation Plan - Layout 2 4 16 20 $5.084 Footing Details 2 4 16 1 20 $5,094 Wingwall Layout/ Details 2 4 16 20 $5,084 Temporary/Detour Bridge Layout 2 4 16 20 $5:084 2.32 Structural Special Provisions 4 16 8 $3.516 2.33 Cost Estimate 2 4 8 $1736 2.34 Deliverable Preparation (30%, 75%, 100% 2 hr. each)6 6 6 2 $2,287 2.40 Quality Control Checks and Reviews 8 6 6 20 4 4 $6,457 Technical Collaboration (Survey, Civil, Geotechnical, 6 16 8 B $4.832 2.50 Hydraulics, Environmental 2.60 Construction Support (RFI's, Submittals, etc.) as needed a a 31.872 Labor Subtotal: a 12 34 1 134 120 144 2 $56,070 $0.00 '• GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 0 Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0.00 4 HYOFtALILIC ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: o o 0 n o 0 0 $0 F-VVIR-DNMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & 5 PERMITTING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 _ D 0 0 $o 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING 6,10 1 Project Management 2 4 $2-752 6-20 PS&E Bid Docs 2 14 $4,079 Site Preparation Plan (9011001100 Ad) Roadway plan and profile (30190/100/100 Ad) 2 2D $5'590 Typical Sections and Details (9011Doll 00 Ad) 2 1 z $8 200 Detour plan, profile & typical section (301901100/100 Ad) 4 24 $6,500 Full closure signage plan 2 12 $3,250 Civil Stream grading for bypass and/or abutments (no 2 $2571 drawings) 8 $2,925 Stormwater Site plan and CSPP Civil Special Provisions 2 $1,400 Civil Cost Estimate 2 $1,009 6.30 QC Reviews 6 $1029 6.40 COnstruCtion Su rt 2 $1,009 Labor Subtotal: 8 0 0 0 24 90 0 $55,364 T—. so 00 U. — .. �7llrll: io 1104 .T4 954 744 LJ4 LV fivu,816 Reimbursable Sum: $720 icoff— Page 1 of 6 Exhibit E-1 Hart Crowser, Inc. Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost 224.46° Fixed Fee (FF) 28.00% Direct Hourly Classification Rate Senior Princi;Pa�- ^ _ _$ --.86-8.6 _ r r� inc�pal _ $ Y - 74.38 Senior Associate- $ 62.22 Associate $ 52.63 Senior Proj!tct $ 43 Proje`'t $ 3606 Senior Staff $ 'y 32.22 ` -56 - staff - - _ s 26 Senior Draftar $ 32.04 "_----- y $30.23 y _Draftei Project Assistant $ 29.98 Reimbursables Mileage _Laborato _restii's DrillingSub. _Traffic Control _ub. B&O Tax on Subs Subtotal Total Negotiated Hours X Hourly Rate Cost 0.00 X $313.20 = $ - 21.00 X $262.16 = $ 5,505.35 0.00 X $219.30 = $ - Q.00 X $185.50 = $ ` 0.00 X $154.03 = $ - _ 36.00 X $127.10 = $ 4,575.49 34.00 X $113.56 = $ 3,861.13 0.00 X $93.40 = $ - 10.00 X $112.93 = $ 1,129.28 0.00 X $106.55 = $ - 6.00 X $105.60 = $ 633.58 Subtotal $ 15,704.84 000 Miles x $0.545/mile I larl Crowser Laboratory - Task 2.3 Holt Services - Task 2.2 _ _ - 'Vorthwest Barricade - Task 2.2 _ 1,50k of Holt and Northwest Barricadef $ 218.00 $ 1 100.Q0 $ 4,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 10500 $ 8,423.00 $24,127 D TOTAL: rvcrvamr er co, cV r8 Planning and Research 2 Hart Cromer, Inc. HC BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE 61 DD8 3.20 Field Work 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: o _ 0 REPLACEMENT Principal Project senior staff Senior Drafter Project gssistant _ Labor Sum: 2 _ Reimbursable Sum: hem ISCOPE OF WORK $262.16 $127.10 $113.56 1 $112.93 $105.60 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 12 $1752 3.23 Labor Subtotal: o 0 0 0 0 $0 — $gn - 3.30 Office Work N,STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 3.31 Engineering Analysis and Consultations - Labor Subtotal: 0 o 0 L 0 14 ;p ,GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Geotechnical Reporting 6 12 3 4 3.90 Planning and Research 2 2 2 5 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & PERMITTING Labor Subtotal: 0 61 DD8 3.20 Field Work 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: o _ 0 " " -- 3.21 Site Reconnaissance and Utility Locates 1 _ Labor Sum: 2 _ Reimbursable Sum: 35 34 10 1--G !_ 3.22 Field Explorations 1 1 12 $1752 3.23 Sample Review & Laboratory Testing 4 1 — $gn - 3.30 Office Work 3.31 Engineering Analysis and Consultations 4 16 8 2 T$4 217 3.32 Geotechnical Reporting 6 12 3 4 4 $4,313 3.33 Project Management and Meetings 8 2 $y13pg 3.40 Construction Support 4 Labor Subtotal:7 36 34 10 6 $15,705 r nr vlWUL�V Cry{71 nICCRln119 Labor Subtotal: o 0 1 0 p o $p 5 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & PERMITTING Labor Subtotal: 0 p o p p $p 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: o _ 0 $o _ Labor Sum: 2 _ Reimbursable Sum: 35 34 10 1--G !_ $16,766 $8 423 I(Pff Page 2 of 5 Exhibit E-1 Watershed Science & Engineering Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost 188.43% Fixed Fee (FF) 28.00% Direct Hourly Total X Negotiated Cost Classification Rate Hours Hourly Rate Principal $ 67.31 68.00 X $212.99 = $ 14,483.25 Senior Engineer 1 $ 59.62 5.00 X $188.66 = $ 943.28 Junior Engineer $ 3077 83.00 X $97.37 = $ 8,081.34 Contract Administrator $ 30.00 2.00 X $94.93 = $ 189.86 Subtotal $ 23,697.73 Reimbursables Mileage Airfare Per Diem Subcontract Blank Subtotal GRAND TOTAL: (400 Miles x $0 545/mile) $ 218 00 (Allowance) $ (Hotel + Meals 2$# ## x # trips) $ - (Sub Name & Task) $ - (Allowance) $ $ 218.00 15.73 November 28, 2018 Watershed Science & Engineering vvst BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Principal Senior Engineer 1 Junior Contract Engineer Administrator Item I SCOPE OF WORK $212.99 $188.66 $97.37 1 $94.93 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 $0 2 STRUCTURAL E" kIWEERING Labor Subtotal: a 0 0 77 o S0 "'e (GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 a 0 0 $0 4 HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING 4.10 Data Collection and Review 2 8 $1,205 4.20 ISite Inspection 8 8 1 $2,483 4.30 Channel Survey 2 4 $815 4.40 Hydrology z 4 $e1S 4.50 Hydraulic Anaiysis 2 1 20 $2,562 4.60 Channel Stability and Scour Assessment 10 16 $3,688 4.70 . WDFW and Permit Coordination 12 4 $2,845 4.60 Hydraulic Investigation Report 20 4 16 $6'572 4.90 Meetings & Administration 10 3 2 $2.612 4.10 E Labor Subtotal: 68 5 183 2 1E $23,698 $218 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & 5 PERMITTING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 $0 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 5a Labor Sum: 68 S 83 Z $23,698 Reimbursable Sum: $218 kpff Page 3 of 5 Exhibit E-1 Jacobs Engineering Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost Fixed Fee (FF) Classification Env. Group Lead Env. Project Manager Permit Lead Sr. Cultural Cultural Field Tech Env Engineer Jr Biologist Technical Editor Administration Reimbursables Mileage Airfare Per Diem Subcontract (Blank) Subtotal 117.00% 28.00% Direct Hourly Total X Negotiated = Cost Rate Hours Hourly Rate $ 6615 49.00 X $162.07 = $ 7,941.31 $ 47.83 58.00 X $117.18 = $ 6,796.64 $ 33.80 86.00 X $82.81 = $ 7,121.66 $ 76.13 2.00 X $186.52 = $ 373.04 $ 2800 50.00 X $68.60 = $ 3,430.00 $ 3363 10.00 X $82.39 = $ 823.94 $ 33.80 141.00 X $82.81 = $ 11,676.21 $ 45.55 9.00 X $111.60 = $ 1,004.38 $ 25.00 4.00 X $61.25 = $ 245.00 Subtotal $ 39,412.17 (500 Miles x $0.545/mile) $ 272 50 (Allowance) $ (Hotel + Meals @ $144/day x 3days) $ 432.00 (Sub Name & Task) $ - (Allowance) $ $ 704.50 GRAND TOTAL: $40,11 November 28, 2018 Jacobs Engineering JE BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE Env. Group Env. PrOect Permit Sr. Cultural Field Em. Engineer Biologist Technical Admin REPLACEMENT Lead Men3:r Lead Cultural Tech Jr Editor Item SCOPE OF WORK $162.07 $117.18 1582.811$186.521 $68.60 1 $82.39 1 $82.81 $111.60 1$61.2511 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Labor Subtotal: 0 1 a 0 a 0 1 0 0 0 0 $0 2 5TRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o $0 GE CO ETGE CO ETHNICAL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 a 1 o 0 - 0 a 0 So 4 HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0---:L-0 - o a 0 0 $a ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & 5 PERMITTING 5.10 oject Management 2 14 4 $2,210 5.20 GencyCoordination 3 5 $1.072 5.30 PAISEPA Documentation 1 5 30 $3,232 5.40 191ologicall Assessment 40 20 96 5 $17,334 5.50 NHPA Section 106 Evaluation 1 4 2 50 2 $4,657 5.80 JARPA Package Preparation and Submittal 1 5 40 10 5 2 $5,522 5.70 Local Permits and Approvals 1 3 16 $1,839 5.80 Biology Support During Construction (Optional) 2 40 $3,547 Labor Subtotal: 49 58 88 2 60 10 141 9 4 $39,412 �y1T —J $705 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING r Labor Subtotal: C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $o Le bo ka-- mi: 49 $S 85 j L 7u t3 _ 141 J 4 y0,2,7 'r 12 Riaimbumable Sum: $7d' kpff Page 4 of 4 KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: December 10, 2018 ACTION REQUESTED: Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing Chair Signature on Supplement No. 1 to KPFF Task Order 16 BACKGROUND: KPFF is currently providing structural engineering design for the bridge replacement at Big Boulder Creek. The vacancy of County Engineer and the recent resignation of Engineering Services Manager Folk necessitate additional reliance on consulting services for bridge replacement design — specifically civil and roadway engineering. The original task order identifies the County as the civil/roadway engineering service provider. Currently, Public Works does not the design capacity meeting our original contract obligation. The cost of the supplement is $35,000. The new not to exceed cost of the task order is $208,000. INTERACTION: Public Works RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chair's signature on Supplement No. I to KPFF Task Order No. 16. HANDLING: Return one original to Public Works ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; Task Order Supplement LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON KPFF TASK ORDER NO. 16 SUPPLEMENT NO. 1— BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT WHEREAS: Public Works selected KPFF as a structural design firm following a prescribed procurement process in 2016; and WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners approved KPFF Task Order No. 16 with Resolution 2018-160 on October 2, 2018; and WHEREAS: Recent resignation of the Engineering Services Manager reduces Public Works design capacity supporting Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement; and WHEREAS: KPFF is offering to offset the County's obligation to provide civil and roadway design in the project; and WHEREAS: The cost of additional KPFF project design support is $35,000 bringing a new task order price (not to exceed) to $208,000; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's Signature on KPFF Task Order No. 16 Supplement No. 1 in the amount of $35,000 bringing the total task order price (not to exceed) to $208,000. DATED this 10th day of December, 2018, at Ellensburg, Washington. Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik ❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Laura Osiadacz, Chairman Obie O'Brien, Vice -Chairman Cory Wright, Commissioner 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600 Seattle, WA 98101 206.622.5822 kpff cot n . November 28, 2018 Mark Cook, PE Kittitas County Public Works 411 North Ruby, Suits 1 Ellensburg, WA 98926 Subject: Kktttss County On -Cell Agreement KCPW 2017-19EN02 Supplement #1 for Task Order 16 Dear Mark; This letter addresses the scope and The for additional scope work discussed between the County and KPFF conforming to the project goals and final development of the PUE contract documents and construction support. The new scope Items are c MI and roadway engineering described In Task 6 in the revised scope of work document that is attached Pursuant to accomplishing this additional work, we request an additional budget of $35,000, bringing our total not -to -exceed amount for this Task Order to $208,000. A breakdown of the additional fee for Task 6 is attached. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (206) 926-0442. .�nrs--ro.I,_ � ' - r�`°� KZZ'TYT�13 COUl�TTY + DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS KI7'PITAS CnUNfY� Formal Task Order Document KPFF Task Order Number 016 Maximum Amount Payable $208,000 Completion Date 12/30/2019 The general provisions and clauses of Local Agency Agreement Number (KCPW 2017- 19ENG2) shall be in full force and effect for this Task Order. Location of Project: Kittitas County Project Title: Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement Description of Work: KPFF will prepare the PS&E documents for the replacement of the Big Boulder Creek Bridge in coordination with Kinitas County staff. The design team includes: KPFF — Project Management, Structural and Civil Engineering Hart Crowser—Geotechnical Engineering Watershed Science and Engineering -- Hydraulic Engineering Jacobs — Environmental/Permitting Tentative Project Advertisement is April 2019, but will be dependent on permitting, fish windows, and bridge procurement schedules. The existing timber bridge is located on Cle Elum Valley Road over Big Boulder Creek approximately three miles north of the Salmon La Sac Campground. The bridge is currently posted for a 5 Ton weight limit due to scour at the timber sill foundation. The County prefers to replace the bridge with a single lane prefabricated superstructure. TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT KPFF will manage the development of the PLANS, SPECS & ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE (PS&E) in such a manner to ensure the County is able to achieve the desirable bidding date. This effort will include appropriate in-house duties such as invoicing, contract 3�tiC CM -ALIS TO riti.. KiTr"AS Gi1UH'E r 3KITTIrrA13 4C0O1LTWWW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS compliance assurance, file and staff organization, client communications (emails and telephone), and general project oversight. Project Management tasks include: 1.1 Project Team ]Management and Coordination 1.2 Monthly Progress Reports/Invoices (Assume 8) 1.3 Monthly Project Progress Meetings/Minutes (Assume 8 meetings, held via teleconference) 1.4 Coordination with WDFW (Assume 8 hours) 1.5 Management Reserve - allocation of the reserve funds for additional out of scope tasks based on written approval of the County TASK 2 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING KPF'1~ shall perform the structural engineering analysis and design of the Big Boulder Creek Bridge substructure. KPFF shall perform appropriate analysis and design calculations in accordance with the most current edition (at the time of NTP) of the WSDOT Bridge Design Manual (BDM) and the AAS14TO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, and the Local Agency Guidelines. Considering the location and use of the bridge, alternative criteria, such as Forest Service guidelines, may be considered to reduce construction costs. TASK 2.1 — Project Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit A project kickoff meeting will be held at the existing bridge site. TASK 2.2 — Alternative Analysis Memo Brief memo to summarize site constraints, design criteria and preferred bridge structure TASK 2.3 — Development of PS&E/Contract Bid Documents TASK 2,31— Plan and Calculation Prepm-ation • Project Cover Sheet • General Notes and Quantities • Bridge Layout - plan and elevation • Structural notes • Foundation Plan — Layout • Foundation Design and Details • Wingwall Layout/Details xL��Aul:5 ...7rj %ryf.�}fie :�� •�� KZZ'TITA� CCVNTi� L - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IQTFITAS COUNTY TASK 2.32 — Structural Special Provisions TASK 2.33 — Cost Estimate TASK 2.34 — Deliverable preparation TASK 2.40 — Quality Control Checks and Reviews TASK 2.50 — Technical Collaboration Structural design engineers will coordinate with survey, civil, geotechnical, hydraulics and environmental engineers for project design and contract coordination. TASK 2.60 — Construction Support If needed to provide support during construction to respond to RFI's and review submittals. TASK 3 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TASK 3.10 — Planning and Research Hart Crowser will review readily available geologic maps and water well logs that cover the site vicinity, and other reports and plans provided by others (if any) for general information regarding subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and geologic hazards. Hart Crowser will coordinate field explorations with KPFF, Kittitas County, USFS, drilling subcontractors, and internal staff. If required, Hart Crowser will submit a traffic control plan for review by the County. TASK 3.20 — Field Work TASK 3.21— Site Reconnaissance and Utility Locates Hart Crowser will conduct a reconnaissance to get familiarized with the site. Relevant features will be noted, and the proposed exploration location marked for the utility locators. Hart Crowser will notify "One -Call." service for public utility locates. TASK 3.22 -- Field Explorations Hart Crowser will advance one boring near the south side of the bridge. (The north side of the bridge cannot be accessed with drilling equipment due to load restrictions.) The 34 i4...'fD.77u.�. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS KI I -i i I/w1 l.'wn'FY boring will be advanced using a TSi 150CC Sonic Drill, which can typically penetrate through boulders and similar materials. The boring will be advanced until one of the following criteria is reached: 1) the boring penetrates 10 feet into rock, 2) refusal occurs within nested boulders, or 3) we reach a depth of 50 feet. If thick soil layers (sand, gravel, etc.) are encountered, then occasional soil samples will be obtained by driving split -spoon samplers in accordance with the standard penetration test (SPT) procedure (American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM] D 1586), Hart Crowser will observe the exploration, log the subsurface conditions, collect representative soil and rock samples, and transport the samples to the laboratory for further visual evaluation and testing. The borehole will be backfilled in accordance with Department of Ecology regulations. The upper I foot of the borehole will be patched with gravel surfacing. Excess spoils from the borehole will be spread on the ground adjacent to the borehole. If required, Hart Crowser's subcontractors will provide traffic control services during drilling. TASK 3.23 — Sample Review and Laboratory Testing Soil and rock samples obtained from the explorations will be visually classified in the field by Hart Crowser and in Hart Crowser's geotechnical laboratory based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM classification methods. Hart Crowser will conduct a series of geotechnical laboratory tests on selected soil and bedrock samples obtained from the explorations to evaluate the engineering and index properties of the site soils. The specific tests conducted will depend upon actual conditions encountered. For budgeting purposes, Hart Crowser has assumed the tests will include up to eight moisture content determinations, one Atterberg limits determination, three grain -size distribution tests, and one unconfined compressive test. TASK 3.30 — Office Work TASK 3.31— Engineering Analysis and Consultations Hart Crowser will conduct engineering analyses to evaluate seismic hazards, ground settlement, abutment stability, foundation and retaining wall alternatives and design parameters, and earthwork guidelines. Engineering analysis will be completed in general conformance with appropriate Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) design manuals. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS KMr1w5 %uuATr Hart Crowser will consult with the design team regarding their findings and foundation alternatives. TASK 3.32 — Geotechnical Reporting Hart Crowser will prepare a geotechnical report to document their findings and recommendations. The geotechnical report will address design and construction issues, including: • Site and boring location plan(s); • Description of subsurface soil, rock, and groundwater conditions; • Site preparation and earthwork recommendations; • Seismic hazards and WSDOT-based seismic design parameters; • Temporary and permanent abutment foundation alternatives, design recommendations, and stability; • Retaining wall alternatives and design parameters; and • Construction considerations. A draft report will be provided to the design team for review and comments. A final report will be prepared that addresses review comments from the design team. TASK 3.33 — Project Management and Meetings Hart Crowser will provide geotechnical project management and support services, including coordinating staff and subcontractors and conducting telephone consultations and email communications with the design team. Hart Crowser will attend up to one meeting at KPFF's office. TASK 3.40 — Construction Support The geotechnical engineer will provide support during construction to respond to RFPs or changes in Feld conditions. TASK 4 HYDRAULIC DESIGN Watershed Science & Engineering (WSE) will provide hydraulic engineering services for the Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement Project in Kittitas County, Washington. WSE will Iead the hydraulic engineering portions of the project which will include completing the following tasks. TASK 4.10 — Data Collection and Review WSE will collect and review existing data and information needed to complete the hydraulic investigation. Data will include but not be limited to topographic traps including LiDAR data, .t ^`XON,..TWUnrNc - + DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS K17"TAS COUNTY historical aerial photos, flood data, bridge maintenance records, and anecdotal information on past flood events from County maintenance staff. Assumptions: e County will supply relevant data they possess TASK 4.20 — Site Inspection WSE will conduct a one -day field inspection to examine the crossing and Big Boulder Creek. WSE will examine hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics, sediment transport, debris flow potential, lateral erosion, and scour. Assumptions: • NTA is received in time to allow WSE to visit the site before snow fall. TASK 4.30 — Channel Survey WSE will survey up to eight cross sections and a longitudinal profile of the stream channel as part of the site inspection task above_ WSE will merge the stream channel data with the County's survey to develop a single topographic base map required for the hydraulic investigation. Assumptions- • County will or has collected detailed topographic data within the road right-of-way. TASK 4.40 — Hydrology WSE will use USGS regional regression equations to estimate annual instantaneous peak design flow rates. The design event for flow and scour will be the 100 -year flood and the check flood for potential damage will be the 500 -year event. The 500 -year event is not the design event, it is solely Used to assess risk in -order to identify any remaining significant erosion or scour issues that might need to be addressed in the design. Assumptions: o USGS regression equations will provide reasonable estimates for the 100 -year and 500 - year annual instantaneous peak flows. If they do not, WSE will use alternative methods to estimate the flows, TASK 4.50 —Hydraulic Analysis WSE will develop a simple HEC -RAS model of Big Boulder Creek in the vicinity of the bridge crossing using topographic base map. The model will not be calibrated because observed DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Kri n rwawun1YV discharge/highwater marks are not available. Instead, WSE will use engineering judgment to select and adjust model parameters. The model will be used to help size the bridge waterway, to provide data required to evaluate lateral erosion and scour potential, and to develop countermeasures. TASK 4.60 — Channel Stability and Scour Assessment WSE will determine if lateral erosion, local scour, ice, or debris flows pose a threat to the proposed crossing. If they do, WSE will work with KPFF to address these hazards in the design. Assumptions: + These hazards will be addressed through modifications the structure itself (e.g. deeper foundations, longer bridge, etc.) and not through design and installation of external countermeasures (e.g. riprap). if countermeasures are required, the optional task at the end of this scope will be completed. TASK 4.70 — WDFW and Permit Coordination It is anticipated that WDFW personnel have an idea of the length of crossing they would like to see at the site. WSE will work with WDFW personnel, the County, and Jacobs (the company that will acquire the project permits) to collectively arrive at a bridge length that is acceptable to all parties. An allowance is provided for WSE's lead engineer to participate in one meeting with WDFW personnel in Ellensburg. Assumptions-, • A reasonable bridge length will be agreed to that the County can afford to build. TASK 4.80 — Hydraulic Design Report WSE will prepare a hydraulic design report to summarize and document the results of the investigation. It will include the recommended NBIS Scour Code rating for the new structure, a code that the County will need for their records. Assumptions: • A draft of the report will be provided to the County and KPFF for review. Upon receipt of comments, WSE will refine the report and submit a final version as a PDF TASK 4.90 — Meetings and Administration An allowance is provided for WSE personnel to attend one meeting at KPFF's Seattle office to discuss the design and one meeting in Ellensburg to meet with the County. ` •,�Vti4...7q 7llH�. ItI7TITA8 LDIJN7Y 3kKXW XWAM4C TDvj ww DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Assumptions: • WSE will develop concept sketches of the countermeasures which will be provided to KPFF. KPFF will prepare detailed plans to be incorporated into the project plan set. • WSE will recommend specifications for the countermeasures. WSE has included a modest cost for this task in the accompanying cost estimate. This estimate will be revisited and may need to be revised once the type and scale of countermeasures required are identified. • At this time it is assumed that scour and erosion protection countermeasures are not necessary and have not been included in the fee TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL/PERMITTING The Jacobs team will deliver Environmental Documentation and Permitting in coordination with KPFF and Kittitas County staff. TASK 5.10 -- Project Management 1. Project planning, team direction and coordination and ongoing client communication 2. Project Controls a. Prepare monthly invoices and back-up, and monthly progress reports. b. Monitoring and updating Environmental delivery schedule. 3. Deliverables a. Monthly progress reports and invoices TASK 5.20 —Agency Coordination 1. Agency Coordination a. Coordinate with Kittitas County Public Works, Kittitas County Community and Development Services, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Ecology, US Army Corps of Engineers, and other agencies as needed. b. Coordination items include impact analysis, permits required and timelines, and facilitated review of project milestones as needed. TASK 5.30 — NEPA/SEPA Documentation 1. NEPA/SEPA Documentation a. Research and prepare one (1) NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) form b. Research and prepare one (1) SEPA Checklist and Draft DNS if needed TASK 5.40 — Biological Assessment 1. Biological Assessment a. Field Reviews b. Prepare one (1) Biological Assessment, assumed to be formal consultation with both Services. a� KSrTTXWJL11:3 4Cl7LTWW3r DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORDS KITTfI'AS (:UUITY! c. Provide ongoing coordination with agencies throughout the review/approval process. TASK 5.50 — NHPA Section 106 1, NHPA Section 106 Evaluation a. Develop Area of Potential Effects (APE) and coordinate with SHPO. b. Evaluate cultural and historic resources within the project area of effect as per Section 106 requirements. TASK 5.60 — JARPA Package Preparation and Submittal JARPA Preparation and Submittal a. Populate and submit one (1) JARPA application package. b. Coordination with federal and/or state agencies for the following permits: i. Corps 404 permit, United States Army Corps of Engineers (Assumes Nationwide Permit) ii. Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA), WA State Dept. of Fish & Wildlife iii. Ecology 401 permit review including development ofTESC and SWPPP. TASK 5.70 — Local Permits or Approvals 1. Local Permits or Exemptions a. Coordinate with Kittitas County CDS on SEPA, Shorelines, and Critical Areas requirements. TASK 5.80 — Biology Support During Construction (OPTIONAL) 1. Support services during construction, including worksite isolation support, fish salvage and removal, planting or site stabilization guidance up to 40 hours. This task is not subject to Assumption l a. Assumptions: # Coordination with FHWA or WSDOT Local Programs will not be required. o The Biological Assessment that will be prepared will be "Likely to Adversely Affect" for Bull Trout and Steelhead, and will require formal consultation with both USFWS and NMFS. • The US Army Corps of Engineers will issue a CWA Section 404 NWP 14, No individual permit will be required. • Section 106 will be determined as "May Affect", and will require SHPO concurrence • The Department of Ecology will issue a Letter of Verification for CWA Section 402. No individual permit will be required. + No wetlands will be impacted by the project. This Scope does not include wetland delineations or reporting. • No NPDES Permit will be required. • SEPA will be exempt. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • If the level of effort and cost for permit or approval acquisition is higher than the budget amount, Jacobs will coordinate with KPFF and the County to determine amendments as needed. • No mitigation planning is included in this scope of work_ TASK 6 CIVIL/ROADWAY ENGINEERING KPFF will provide civil engineering support for the replacement of Big Boulder Creek Bridge. Civil design criteria will be Kittitas County Code Chapter 12- Roads and Bridge Standards and as supplemented by the WSDOT Design Manual or AASHTO's Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets. TASK 6.1— Civil Project' Management • Attend six (6) progress meetings via teleconference. • Prepare invoice progress reports TASK 6.2 — Development of PS&ElContract Bid Documents Plan Preparation, for 30%, 75%, 100% draft, 100%Ad • Site Preparation • Roadway plan and profile • Typical sections and details • Detour plan, profile and typical section • Full Closure Signage Plan Supporting Work: • Civil stream grading for stream bypass. • Prepare Stormwater Site plan and Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Civil Special Provisions • Provide WSDOT run list format civil technical special provisions Civil Cost Estimate • Provide quantities and unit prices for civil elements of work TASK 6.3 — Quality Control Checks and Reviews KPFF senior civil engineering staff will QC all civil design deliverables. �`y�, KITTIT14i13 COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS K!'7-TIT.45 COf3NPY TASK 6.40 — Construction Support If needed to provide support during construction to respond to RFI's and review submittals. Assumptions: Existing ROW and survey basemap control provided by County will be depicted on civil drawings. Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) limits will be defined on Civil Site Preparation plan. Legal Descriptions of TCE's, including TCE documentation and acquisition will be performed by the County. Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) plans will not be provided, a performance spec will be used for TESC. For Stormwater Management it is assumed the project is considered Road Preservation per SWMMEW Section 2.1.4 and therefore only needs to meet core requirement #1 and #2 as scoped above. Preparation of the Construction SWPPP will be a bid item and prepared by the Contractor. Approach guardrail systems will not be required. Bridge railings will be signed with hazard object markers. Tri, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS wrrsr�g cotjn rr PROJECT DELIVERABLES: 1. Alternatives Analysis Memo (Draft and Final) 2. 30% Plan Set (Permit set. 3 sheets estimated. Layout, Elevation, Cross-section, structural notes, Cost Estimate) 3. 75% Plan Set (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, GSP run -list, 30% comment resolution) 4. 100% Draft Plans (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, PDF ofGSP°s or run -list and PSE files, pending final review by county, 75% comment resolution and complete PS&E) 5. 100% Stamped and Signed Plans (Contract Documents — bid ready) 6. Geotechnical report (Draft. PDF and Final PDF + 3 hard copies) 7. One (1) NEPA CE and ECS Form 8. One (1) NHPA Section 106 Compliance Memo 9. One (1) Biological Assessment (Formal Consultation) 10. One (1) SEPA Checklist (Unless Exempt) 11. One (1) JARPA package for delivery to USACE, WDFW, and WDOE 12. Local Agency correspondence for each permit, approval, or exemption PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS: 1. COUNTY to provide KPFF with the project survey base map. County will collect additional data as necessary as requested by KPFF. Contours shall be in at least 2 foot increments and shall preferably extend at least 200 feet to the north, south, east and west of the proposed project limits to include all utilities, driveways, ditches, ROW/property lines and other items which are reasonably likely to impact the bridge layout and design. 2. KPFF to provide specifications related to the PS&E they develop (bridge portion only). 3. New bridge is assumed to be designed for one 12 foot lane, and two 2 foot shoulders and no sidewalks. 4. Bridge superstructure will have a 2% crown from the centerline of the roadway, or as prescribed by COUNTY Civil roadway design. 5. There will be no drains on the bridge. 6. Bridge superstructure is assumed to be prefabricated and designed and supplied by the Contractor during construction. 7. Load rating report will be provided by bridge superstructure supplier. 8. COUNTY will prepare Division I and assemble special provision package and bid package. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Cost Breakdown: See Attached Project Schedule: KPFF will provide a PDF of the plans for the 30%,7M and 1000A design at the dates shown below. For efficiency, the design will continue following milestone submittal while the county performs review of the submitted plans. The COUNTY will endeavor to complete and return to KPFF all comments as soon as possible following receipt of them, but in no case more than 10 business days following the submittal data. Milestone Milestone Description — Stracturai Description — Civil Delivery Date 30% November Permit set. 3 sheets estimated. Permit set. Roadway plan 2019 Layout, Elevation, Cross- and profile and detour section, basic notes plan and profile. Typical sections. 75% January 2019 6-8 sheets, all items including 5-7 sheets, all items further development of the including further notes, specs, and quantities. development of the notes, specs, and quantities. 100 % Draft March 2019 6-8 sheets, all items developed 5-7 sheets, all items and ready for construction, developed and ready for Pawling final review by County. mon, Pig Complete PS&E. final review by County. Complete PS&E. 1009A Stamped April 2019 Stamped and Signed Contract Stamped and Signed and Signed Dock -- bid ready. Contract Documents — bid read . Completion Date: December 30, 2019 Agency Signature: I1��1 r+i Date: Date: 1 f Exhibit ©-1 CKPFF Consulting Engineers Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement Kltdtas County Orr -Call Task Order ##16: BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost Fixed Fee (FF) Classification 136.25% 28.00% Direct Hourly Rate Reimbursables M�Isa e ,Are or ;Dion SubcoWtre {Blat�kY, Subtotal Total X Negotiated _ Cost Hours Hourly Rate 16.00 X $171.52 = $ 2,744.39 104.00 X $119.68 = $ 12,446.60 34.00 X $171.52 = $ 5,831.84 134.00 X $119.68 = $ 16,036.96 144.00 X $114.34 = $ 16,465.10 208.00 X $97.59 = $ 20,298.21 234.00 X $121,66 = $ 28,468.60 20.00 X $76.24 = $ 1,524.72 0.00 X $58.14 = $ - 0.00 X $60.99 = $ - 0.00 X $0.00 = $ - 0.00 X $0.00 = $ - 0.00 X $0.00 = $ - Subtotal $ 103,816.43 :2Z M ilk , :$0.,5431r�ail (�Ili�wanc�) FiateP + meals_ :# -- - (u�i -wn-'e � Tqs �) - - �� . w (Ali�wance) Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit E) Management Reserve g 1'C9:9?0 $ 119.90 $88,160,24 $15,673 GRAND TOTAL: $207,769.57 November 28, 201$ KPFF Consulting Engineers KPFF BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Principal Manager Manager Technical Specialist Structural Task Lead Project Engineer CM Terhniclan Project Coordinator Hem I SCOPE OF WORK $171.52 $119.68 $171.52 $119.68 $114.34 L $121.86 $76.24 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.10 Project Team Management and Coordination so $7.181 1.20 Monthly Progress ReporWrivoices 8 12 $1,872 1.30 ;Monthly Project Progress MeetinpsMllnutes 16 6 $2,372 140 'Coordination with WDFW Labor.Subtotal: a a 92 0 0 D 0 18 $957 $12,383 �_ " I.q .:, -• $1,19.90 515,873.00 2. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 2.10 Project Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit 6 t3 $1;438 2.20 Alternative Analysis Memo 2 to $2 ?56 2.30 Development of PS&E/Contract'Bid Documents 2.37 Plan and Calculation Preparation Cover Sheet 2 2 61' General Notes, Quantities, 2 4 4 20 Bridge Layout - plan and elevation 4 1 20 8 20 B8, Foundation Plan - Layout 2 4 16 204 Footing Details 2 4 16 20 $51184 Win wall Layout I Details 2 4 16 20 W.06A TemporarylDetour Bridge Layout 2 4 16 20 2.32 Structural. Special Provisions 4 16 8 $5;S 2.33 Cost Estimate 2 4 8 $� 2.34 J Deliverable Preparation (30%, 75%, 100% 2 hr. each) 1 6 6 6 2 52 2.40 Quality Control Checks and Reviews 8 6 e aD 4 4 138° 2.50 Technical Collaboration (Survey, Civil, Geotechnical, Hydraulics, Environmental 6 16 8 e 5444 2.60 Constriction Supppri (RFI',, Submittals, etc.) as needed Labor Subtotal 9 12 34 8 184 $ 120 144 2 51.872 $56,070 $0.00 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 0 Laborflubootal: 0 a 0 0 0 o a $a 4 HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING Labor subtotal: a a0 0 $0.00 $o s 5 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & PERMITTING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 a $0.00 $D 7 31i i .ia :.. i3 CIVIL ENGINEERING $0,00 6.10 Project Management 2 4 $2,752 6.20 P.S&E Sid Docs Site Preparation Plan (9011 001100 Ad) 2 14 914 Roadway plan and profile (30!90!100!100 Ad) 2 20 Typical Sections and Details (+30!100!100 Ad) 2 12 Detour plan, proftle & typical section (30/9011001100 Ad) 4 24 Full olosure signage plan 2 1 12 ',2Stf Civil Stream grading for bypass and/or abutments (no draWin 2 $21571 Stomlvvater Site plan and CSPP a $3 e2ii Civil Special Provisions 2 m! Civil Cost Estimate 2 S1a00B 6.30 QC Reviews 6 "l 6.40 Construction Support 2 Labor Subtotal: 8 0 0 a 24 1 90 1 0 $36,864 r1r:lW,'. sn.no LaborSum:i 16 1 104 1 34 1 5.34 ' 144 1 Asa 1 z4ius,eiils Reimbursable Sum: $120 �� Page 1 of 6 Exhibit E-1 Hart Crowser, Inc. Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement 13IG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost Fixed Fee (FF) Classification Senior Principal Principal Senior Associate Associate Senior Project Project Senior Staff Staff Senior Drafter _ Draftei Project Assistant Reimbursables Mileage Laboratory Testing _Drilling Sub. Traffic Control Sub T B&O Tax on Subs Subtotal 224.46% 28.00% Direct Hourly Total Negotiated _ Rate Hours X Hourly Rate - Cost $ 8886 0.00 X $313.20 = $ $ $ 74.38 21.00 X $262.16 = $ 5,505.35 $ 62.22 0.00 X $219.30 = $ - $ 52.63 0.00 X $185.50 = $ - $ 4370 0.00 X $154.03 = $ - $ 36.06 36.00 X $127.10 = $ 4,575.49 $ 32.22 34.00 X $113.56 = $ 3,861.13 $ 26.50 0.00 X $93.40 = $ - $ 32.04 10.00 X $112.93 = $ 1,129.28 $ 30.23 0.00 X $106.55 = $ - $ 2996 6.00 X $105.60 = $ 633.55 Subtotal $ 15,704.84 (500 AARes x $0 545/mile) Hart Crowser Laboratory - Task 2-3 Holt Services - Task 2.2 Northwest Barricaded - Task 2.2 1 50A of Holt and Northwest Barricade $ 218.00 $ 1,100 00 $ 4,500.00 $ 2,504.00 $ 105.00 $ 8,423.00 GRAND TOTAL: $24,127.84 Page 2 of 5 Exhibit E-1 Watershed Science & Engineering Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost Fixed Fee (FF) Classification Principal Senior Engineer 1 Junior Engineer Contract Administrator Reimbursables Mileage Airfare Per Diem Subcontract Blank Subtotal 188,43% 28.00% Direct Hourly Total X Negotiated _ Rate Hours Hourly Rate $ 67.31 $ 59.62 $ 3077 $ 30.00 68.00 X $212.99 5.00 X $188.66 83.00 X $97.37 2.00 X $94.93 400 Miles x $0.545/mile) Cost $ 14,483.25 $ 943.28 $ 8,081.34 $ 189,86 Subtotal $ 23,697.73 (Allowance) (Hotel + Meals @ $# ## x # trips) -(Sub Name & Task) . Allowance) $ 218.00 $ 218.00 GRAND TOTAL: $23,915.73 November 28, 2018 Watershed Science 8, Engineering WSE BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT principal F senior Engineer 1 .junior Engineer Contract Adminiatrelo item SCOPE OF WORK $212.99 $188.66 $97.37 $94.93 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 $0 2 tA1i STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 0 o 10 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 a 0 0 $0 4 HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING 4.10 Data Collection and Review 2 8 $1,2:5 4.20 Site inspection 8 8 $2,483 4.30 Channel survey 2 4 $e.8 4.40 Hydrology 2 4 $816 4.50 Hydraulic Analysis 2 1 20 $2,682 4.60 Channel Stability and Scour Assessment 10 16 83,888 4.70 WDFW and Permit Coordination 12 4 52,945 4.80 Hydraulic Investigation Report 20 4 16 $8,572 4.90 Meetings & Administration 10 3 2 $2.612 4.10 Labor Subtotal: 88 5 83 2 $25,698 8 �...vtif i ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION 8 PERMITTING $216 LaborSubtotal,1 0 0 0 $g 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING Labor Subtdal:l 0 0 0 0 $0 - - -1:Yrt1[:1 .. .. .. Labor sum: 60 1 0 ns I t I il3,tiva Reimbursable Sum: $218 Page 3 of 5 Exhibit E-1 Jacobs Engineering Consultant Fee Summary Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Overhead (OH) Cost Fixed Fee (FF) Classification Env. Group Lead Env. Project Manager Permit Lead Sr. Cultural Cultural Field Tech Env. Engineer Jr _Biologist Technical Editor Administration Reirnbursabies Mileage Airfare Per Diem Subcontract (Blank) Subtotal 11700% 28.00% Direct Hourly Rate $ 66.15 $ 47.83 $ 33.80 $ 76.13 $ 28.00 $ 33.63 $ 33.80 $ 45.55 $ 25.00 Total X Negotiated = Hours Hourly Rate 49.00 X $162.07 58.00 X $117.18 86.00 X $82.81 2.00 X $186.52 50.00 X $68.60 10.00 X $82.39 141.00 X $82.81 9.00 X $111.60 4.00 X $61.25 Subtotal Cost $ 7,941.31 $ 6,796.64 $ 7,121.66 $ 373.04 $ 3,430.00 $ 823.94 $ 11,676.21 $ 1,004.38 $ 245.00 $ 39,412.17 (50.0 Miles x $0.5451mile) _ _ .. $ 272.50 (Allowance) $ - (Hotei + Meals @ $144/day x 3days) _ $ 432.00 (Sub Name & Task) $ - (All owanee) $ - $ 704.50 GRAND TOTAL: $40,116.67 November 28, 2018 Jacobs Engineering it= BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Env. Group Lead tEnv, Project Pennii Lead Sr. Cultural Cultural Tom, Env. Engineer Biologist Technical Editor Admin E=SCOPE OF WORK $182.67 $117.18 1$82.811$186.521 $68.80 1 $82.39 $82.81 $111.60 $81.25 4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Labor Subtotal: 0 0 1 0 o D a 8 0 0 Yle " ..fit •tt'r:. � �I . �.' �, 7 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: a 0 0 o a a a a o so GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Labor subtotal: a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 o so 4 HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal: 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 o $0 8 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION PERMITTING 5.10 Project Mane e"nt 2 14 4 $2,210 5.20 Agency Coordination 3 5 $1,072 5.30 NEPAISEPA Documentation 1 5 30 $3232 5.40 Biological Assessment 40 20 90 5 $17,334 5.50 NHPA Section 106 Evaluation 1 4 2 50 2 $4,6557 5.60 DARPA Package Preparation and Submittal 1 5 40 10 5 1 2 $5522 5.70 Local Permits and Approvals 1 3 16 $1,838 5.80 Biology Support During Construction [Optional) 2 40 $3,647 LaborSubtatal: 49 58 66 2 s0 10 141 8 4 $39,412 s. $1105 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING Labor Subtotal:1 0 0 1 0 0 0 o a o a so Labor Sum. 1 48. 1 58 1 86 2 1 50 1 10 1 145 1 9 4 $39,412 Reimbumabte Sum: 1 $705 1CPff Page 4 of 4 KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: December 10, 2018 ACTION REQUESTED: Establish the Internal Roadways Serving Lanigan Springs Subdivision as Public Rights of Way BACKGROUND: Public Works purchased the Lanigan Springs internal roadway network pursuant to Board direction in February 2018. Public Works now desires establishing public rights of way over all roadways in Public Works ownership. Once the Board of County Commissioners establishes the various rights of way associated with the various roadways, Public Works can then sign the roads as "Primitive" and begin limited maintenance activities over the roadway network. INTERACTION: Public Works RECOMMENDATION: Direct that the internal roadway network within Lanigan Springs subdivision now in Public Works ownership be established as Public rights of way. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Legal Description from County Surveyor Turnbull Exhibit 2: Map of Lanigan Springs Roadway Network LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director EXHIBIT 1: Legal Description Lanigan Springs Road Network Legal Descriptions All those roads shown upon that certain Survey recorded in Book 2 of Surveys, Pages 6 to 10, filed under Auditor's File No. 397916, records of Kittitas County Washington,- Said ashington;Said roads further described and delineated as Main Road, Easement A, Easement B, Easement C, Easement D, and Easement E, on Page 10 of said Survey. EXHIBIT 2: Map of Lanigan Springs Roadway Network 997916 PAGE E OFA UNIGAN SuMy ASAP OF SPRINGS aNrurTEol EOATIONS OF 1 HE N}, SECT ION 30, 1OW NSHIP 30 N0E1H, "GE 16 FAST, W.M.. i1T1STAS=l'f, WASHINGTON T �.. 23 '°ayr.. SAI II 24 S.0 A., 3.4 A— 29 30 25az 1 r S.1 AerN 28 S.3 Aarn 2e s,] Aan 33 � S, 7 Aaa ! V 27 Y' j e'l'f{�. A A— e r:7 37 { S.YAun n3PSArr e.sSAli . 4.5 39 5.6 Aen' V a 5.3 Aw. 41 _ + uxMs AVM 5.4 Aua. 3'IV vn '%f dg fA 42 1 $ � y r,3Aern � I SCALE; r• mo` �6 ' t ii SS I •SEI.S/P' =INI aw s�'�P+Ye fAli1C•-C:_!;7;i I4 �S.IYplpe xaEM+Hr nEH6MSN 1- +bE,E4N lL� I ;?/6 sulwy &W OF LAN16AN SPRINGS ;uNnA3lEci poulom OF YK Ni, SIC110NIp. 70WMShlP 2C NONTH, MMGE 16 FA31,W.M.. Kl" 11ASCOUNTY, Y&S)UNGTON • 18 S. -A.... lo, 22 S.. A.- 21 is 17 lb W—r. 5.2 Aa. 4 12 5.1 A— SA A.. 7 A— % 5.4 A— Wan CFRlifICATION I M_by p. JF V phi f SAMOAN S"INGS il b." S..,;- 30, 7—kIr P—d. 4 -"- U.— H.. 9606 t&,—= LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR LANIGAN SEEINCS Ea.ple lt.d7 loll iw prelim of the hbehor.t tpnnn atSwlix. 30. Tod-n,h;.20 N.dh, Iers• l6b,a, W.M., killiloo C..FV. Wodo6gio,, yNq h;.LsPsWNy.hil- kgimraEm the E2d gwrr.r rwv or mid 1-6. Z, IN- N 6`01'25'1, lho p oho E. bavod.ey 1.14 s"7. . 39, 661.46 feel; Oor.e 5 01.22 G . 21",57 feel ro eel.. Ila• tors,,.- 1-11: ;oar rhre"S 11P22'73^0r. 1110.M 1";'hoe. N73T40•E, 572.91 fow, Oh ,.. N 11'1POPE, 3%,74F--; -hm.. 103.40 fpm 1,wWf arw .i.h., aro reprt. 7..57 loop Ihe,rt. S P•v']7•E, '_On.Of 1..f IOIM Irw loin! d6epin.inl. L072 The prry'm of 11. Mdhre•t{„xo, W Seeks, W, Taemhlp 10 hpnh, fmpe la boll, W.M., Kpfllw [truly, Wwhkp oo .,holo ki-ded her . Dmd-F6ed w Wlaes: Ir9im6r1 w the EW gmrlw ewn.r of odd Swlhn 30, aunt. N 76.75'41, .h ,, -M E.d bpewy amid Suwon W. 4161.93 fen' hew. S 4Pw, ,73,w, 1334,33 f,N n rho Irv. E.kr, mbeplmkp; !hoer 58P]X73•W. 8410-W foal tF.nee NO.5T77'W. 506.00 fee'; Phre 5 51'00'41 •E, loer: mdlm thence M,W .vel. 11,0P roc I.op'h elm- r W iw sun. rtdh1, ..r'mplFI E, 62 feel; 1he.r 65.90 Tor rodiw 116.76 hoot' .horn S 77'38' 19"E, 6]5,51 tee P; tamic S 1.03'34.41, 172.99 r..l '. Ibe 6ae loon- .r a.gi.Ny. t01 3 itm WN, M Ph, 6snh.e.r a2.d+, of SiOlm 30, la -chip 10 Nwh, Rollie 16 Err, W.M., KIKIro3 Carly. W.W.plm wM,h i, hw.dd b, a I;r de'sr;bd w Fill..- R.pfrrLnp.r IM L. tp a .F.4 5.r;- 3{L 1611.. N Tdp25.4, •hug 0. lex b...I q 4r rla 5wJfon 30. L61.E5 free; thorn S 8P22 -23'W, 1354.$5 her; 16eee N PD754W 17a,W feel I2 the Ire parol ofbepim;np; Mne. N 21.41'30"W, 6117.00 h,k; 'hmr N 4417']7°00, 309,21 Ml; IN- 5 111•4p9'W, 274.00 ha; pen., 5 il•ob'11•E, 111,79 Ch". thee, 70.00 hen mdWt 400.. Rah . Ivyd• 13.06 1.•1; Ih-e, 65.W k e rd;v. 2r r, 01N, we Im,A 115.001.1; rhe[.5 77'3011•E, 313.31 len h the two pin of 6yiv,ln.. L01e iter pw-L W r 3M Fail a,d 029001 of Yrup ". f..r.Mp 20 MON, I.Q. 16 Erl, N.M., KNlin. [mnPy, Wo.h;ap'm whkh hhwn.kd b7 a lien sMrDed a Id l9w-v 11e9hninpol pie 1wI p,.nn come' of teid Swhm 30, Ih.nnr N 3 704'75 I .holey Ph EoM h 954'- .1!704 5r,ion pr 5.1,93 fM: 1M,�r br'25'27'W, 1.151, .i55 bee; ehwce N 1'L751"14 17I,110 Felt; dere M w41'N^W.:87.00 fen, IN- N8S•IT37'W, 3041.21 Fen to Me Prowir, of byimt W ,hmca N 74•SYI7'W, MS.55 fell; Ihmce 141.78 kat ed' scv'w right. LmI.nNh 135.73 F.1; 'Mote S 5:•54'15'00, 45.77 F..' prove• 20. W teal PION.. sure 4. oe Irq'h 411.75 1..h ,Mo.. S pP0'25'1, 321_731- r6n..5 73T46'W. 117.71 fen; lh.- N E6.111129•E, 331,27 hex, Ohm. 165.40 few tedF. curve riphl, arc I.mth 117.00 kelt Ph- S 51eWWE, x..11„ fee'; IN- N I11 4TSTE, 320..10 f„' k Ph. h M, p.., el h4-i.g, LOT 5 rw prpa. d ob. NU Rod 0. NW2 fS-r- 7.. T-Kp 20 Neth, llm o le [.Me W.M., KFdllm Cadsy, , -1 I S .rack Uh 1-. by 6 lin• z, Lm o. S ,faff a rho S.M 30,t. 641.9 M Id Swi,tn A, 22'23' N 0' 54.55 F, d.rq tae S. -0954 ry oIn.b S,nhr, YI, 661.45 1.x1; .h..[, S IP21'77•W, 1231.55 kers chose, N 1'45'34"ql 1M.00 Ten; IN- N 2*'41.3WW, 4W7 M hot; Ph- N 06'17'37'00, 309.31 fell la IN. Pnr poim 4 Mri.nl,g: tlu-w N M12 -31°W, 4,16.69 hell IP• 3 641612p•M+. 140.0 WI: A— 1511,79 fna, rWw wh,e 4.11" ere I.,glh 117-44 kr: Ph- N 7i1011•W, 2111,33 b.,; ,6- 214.85 F.. toodlw s. 6911, .le Irp,h 113. it 1.e1; three N 42'33'51' W, 92.711 fele; Iheme 21.76 feel rd W. oven We, we Im911, 4..35 kap Iba2. S 36.19'29"00, 157.78 fr1: Phm[. 2C.A loot dim carve Iso, arc lonrh n.75 fed' rbae• S WWr41"E, 144.00 foo; lawn. 141,7912.1 rwlk...... FLIM, rel W,11, 146.0 lwm IN- 3 74'5917.11, 11111.5,55 1.1 M tlr Ire .lien .1 b"l-p LOT 3 TIrP pd;m M 4a< N..Srw, per+.. of S.uian 74, 1e.rh;p M North, Rod'9e 1b Ewr, W.M„ binhwrioo, WwFmidS hkh;. ge2new by.Ile.d,k. k o.hllntImPmdoq T,pkniIF Mlow S. . 30,¢.mer tumid6..590, thr[r N 0.09'531 2ioipPhe ..N IWWWd .D S..l:m 70, 661.45 fe.3e Ilene. a 89'7P]7"W, 1751.55 f 11 iho hoe 1.OW54•W W, W heel rho[. N.411.73700, -W. A !..- h t; Ila. pint 4 1 f2o-rg; 9,3s f N p41T Up 308.71 leer, d.nn - 6,I4. •w, 440..5 kat then. N84.1* 002 319.11 MI; -; here. Ta hW,.Ola;a,rv, 494. w• ImIPh 91.00 fur; Ph- 5 IOb-57-W, 111.27 fen: +hue ID,09 Epee ndi.. N•ve .:Ih, en; I.,..rb 21.4.7 hr; Ih,,,er S 11'HP9•ri, 734.77 fen+¢ rhoPN. pink .I bylnni,.'. LAT 7 Ther pwrh. IF IM NmMm- porn,, a SrMe 30, TennlMp 20 N.nh, Ra,1, 16 EeM, W.M., KIfilw Corny. Wbehnprm wW.6 Ir Een.d.d 6, a I;.. d.ur;..d m bell- wdrirp r -he E.d lonrt.r ..mer al ofd Sw Pim 30, Thee, N C'or29'E..6-IN. Int b.uid" of old S.d;m 37, ,VIAS AP" 16mr 58P22'22 W, 1354.53 We; 0.- N 1.11454.43 179. W food; Rhee N 28'41.38"00, WIM few M the I.paiol M b.lieninl; A- N 2-.41'33700, 164,00 Slee three 37 N 11234'^E, 3W.i NOP: IN- 124,12 LOOP MA,, W~106, mO Ionsh 103.9. foe.; 11 ... S aP7P l4R., 378,00 Ir,; 36n[e 358.64 Feet rsdi., - elEM, Pec leplh 91.78 kn; duo. 5 4-M53'W, 729.61 Wo ro IM ren. pins eF byi,lniy. LOFO Thl pnlr el rhe Nsfhw-yehe+.f Seel'm, ]J, Te-mlGp 20 Nwrh, Ro'9, td 6..r, W.M., Kirflh, C-ly, Wwht,,--Nell i, th-ded bye IIP delsdbrd a fall.we eyladn M the Ned gmd.,-r.f mid $.41!- 30, Ihmee N P61'75"E, N.Pp,bee felt d nM Shitilm W, 661.95 kW: PS,re S 89-77-736W. 1354.5} rove; Phore- N 1'07-" 170,00 f.nr IhP N 29-41-31•00, 3M.m 6.1 blh, u., pelnl IF b,gl-W .Reno:. N 2rdl'3E'W, 207.0 reef; .home N 4PWIS24, 7797.1 feel; Ihar.. 5 61.11.12'E, 771.13 Fora, IN... 53.96 fe.P rdh. ,x•vr ripN, . I. Wlh 66.31 to.,; '6r- S PIO'SP"W, 143.48 her; rh-.. $ &r33 -N -W, 7211.210 1,0 n Ph. hu, pie of be�nnkp. LOTS TM3 IsHee, of IM N1eMpM geloprr d S.n;r 30, Im h;p 20 MON. thence 16 Ewe, W.M. elt'llot O.n1y, WPold., m rK,h 11 Handed by .I;., 4wo3bod It hllan: beyml,q r ler. E..r q- cwr.r.I mid Soer;.n W, II_.. N 70&791E_ d1n8 tM EeM 6W,.ds, a1 mid Sr.Kw M. 661.93 he,; OF—, 5 IP2T923",, 13$4,35 hoe; PN P0Y54"43 170.00 in the the hoe pl,t d 6eelmin; .Mole N 23741130-W, 320.O4eefi thence N W037'1!, 770,20 foes thence 266.71 keel .ode. curve 099, an Irnlh W.11 loH: IMer 5 9`1799'w.16. W FW: -bat[: lm_0p loot elolr,. wrvr Irk, w, I.W6 I23.7r leer: Ihe[e S M71'Ol'0. 166.78 Feel; thane. 28.00 Fmr ,..1:.. eons dgNr, - In91h 13-M Felt; Ph- S 7706'!8"W, WAS few 1. fl., Nee paw .1 bnimin. to] 10 Thr pwrim, eE rho N.rthwe gwea IF Swpm W. 11 -hip 2D Welk Ibn. 16 Imt, W.M., KlpOao CwePV, W..hinrw..h;,S i.bwnded by a line d,wil d It Y free Set- .Ing W IM Ewrq.lotrr comer df mld 5-16. 30. Peor. NM&25"E..I., the Fa., har.Mer OF e;d 5eniee 30, 661,95 Fnli It- 5 41P2Y23'Wf, 435.00 fen.o dor I,, plot 01,jinniM Ilemee S &rM3'V 919.55 roma 1I-. N 1.0454'5, 170.8 Fmk, 0.re N 2VWIi'E, 648.15 her; the„ 65.06 F� oda, wn. 1,R, an I.nPh 90.11 fed; PF- 5 344703"R, 637.31 few k PM - ea., .16n:n,rnp. ]AGF 3 OF : LOT Il Thd.Alen IF IN, f M%Ml woe -..f 5rKw To, 1-1hip 20 Nnfh, bel, .6 Eerf, W:W., KL+flan [5.•'11. WpNnpear,.Nea is bn.MM b7 a Ike der6hrd a k11s.Ii hTimdr,p W PM EeM..mne e.ree- el rM iwrir 30. tM,se N POrIS'S. algin Ib, !eM 6...by M mid 16-7., 661.1-W. 4 hr1lo tree poor.. 45.00F rrlih, NPight..Jr." feet p S 01•ST71• W, 631,92 lea; .hoe. - I hen-22-23.Pel, 52 00 ort Feelrh , erN{ P6odu, S 0013743"F, 177. N keg there. N W •77'23'41. AS,m $el le .he +91, pdnr .1 bnfroln. LOT 12 Time prtlm Of IM Nrdod.n .Tomer OF ScKm 0, 7-1,;p M NsM, Rrw %Err, W.N., Kprlro, C Ool , Weddnpt-Wh 1t bwded by a Ile demribad e, fell- ledmhW c ,he Nwehom, aenr- of mld Susie. 30. "-. 5 0.Or25•W, don oho lar, 6wnd.ry el mid bettor 30, 1321.6/ 1x1 PI • er two prim of 6,94wrop; 3h. & V WIS•WP 777.00reer, .hme, 6IP7Y31"W. 607.92 floe; ehr. 45,90 FW f6dim elw.,o left, e,m 1,,gA 71,67 hole, ,M,e. 70,00 Err ndrw once ,14121, OPP, 4-01, 13.16 hev, r6w, NM' 34'41"00. Ie6,M bM, thence 13.04 f.0 mllu. - right, ae I.nplh $1.61 frrl d...e. N9' OWL, 76.59 her, Ill.- N We94S E, 432.17 feet 1. Phe Pn. pine IF brplminp. LIST 19 Fire pr11r of IM hbnh.wt Irmo, of Srattm W, To-n.l ip X MON, ll 16 Tmt, W,M„ N.lhcowry, 4 -id 5.11 -oh a loom. 2 by a Dm d.m.i6ed a, 2MI..v 3yimin eel rhe Naehex ,awr.F wid Sw,lo1r W. PSrr.5701'TWw,.Iry "Loot ae.4w5..0 wid Snpen 90. 293.16 fee.+ ro rho, IN,pim of bepfminp; Ihoe11 S POY27'W, 673,0. frY PNn.e S 8PI5'LS'W, Ib.12 her; t1,.nee 771.75 fe.t,dhl curve 1eR. r[ ImAh 109.05 loch, Rrre N d0• W 37"!, 006.95 fwI 10 rhe mPe pdM of bepnniry. LOT 14 TMP prtim of the Herthmd el- d NW)N n 20, lwahip M Mrih, Is•p, 11 Ent, W.M., KiNirot Coo-, pOmIjqIm .Wh h 6o.WW IW. It.. d,e04,d a fallen: Ugoorn ep IN, Neeb.mt [sea4i cid S,dlen 30, Ih4wc. S 70&7699, ohm r6. 6M IN-4wf .17;2 74pim 30, 4193,81 F.d; Iboce 5 d4H•77'W, i34.031as 1. the rwphme, 33.va i o -A..-484let*, 00, "Ih I ,11 f P; P N 7109/• 1 12'W. 221. Ih Olt Orme. bW t.�ut emr IFR, an: I.n'h 174,11 het; t1.nO. o S1'IM12"W, 221,131.,1: p -" 41i.M lea rw9w e.M -1? of luglh 1tq.l3leah ohm.. N 6731'483'41, STO_]9 hW; ohm.• 5 P6Y02'!, 567_17!..1 la 1h Rrpdm .f b,pinaln, LOT 17 il.P p.rpFoo, .I -M Nr'h.71 P -r.f Swpm 30, T-Ep 70 I.ea6, Iv.ie 16 EPI. W.M., Mr,ho Corsi, IF mid j m Pm 30. lwuid.d b7 , Ile d.rdMtl n bl1 b Iey I( Pe Nathemt [arra d elk Senior 30. Ibnc. E 70575.11 41,48 the Est 9'aW' al U7 loo pan he m, loo Ned: ohne, S 6 000 O "Wo 539,0012; 2M.00 Foot, N PSX07°W, 767.17 hep h the er.f pear 4or 56yloniep; lk,o N PO. - ht Tm 93. Iwp +hoop S 76.7014"00, 171.29 feel; Phe. 437.18 feel rodN. wr,W 6,1, .+e I I -It 93.'7. 1 1 ,Ir1 S M .06-2 W, 443291.odi thee. 39..18 foot ndiq rel. fight, m Ivph 107.61 Ire; Iluaer Sd70b79"W, 1011.311 loot th , T0.09 furl edior a, , I,6, wee Ia ffeh 40.97 IwP; +hors. 64.171.., mOlm ,an leR, me laegrh 37.46 fir; rAnr. S dT50'54% 375.90 fear; IMP, N 64'3005"!, 596,79 No, N Ih. rn,r p;r of bgfmiip. Lot 16 Tha por6 . d Phe NM6rax 2,>k•.F Sr6r M, T..mhl7 20 North, Rwg, 16 Ewe, W -M., Kls1.e4 Cs try, WcP W,,Ftm Whkh 1, 6[u,ded by n One dar3ed .o, fall-,: boji Wm a rho Nmh.rl - IF wld Secflm M, prince 3 7602!' W, ale. me Ewl6wnbrr .1 aid Swum 303 646.-4 her, .Melte S 6P2r3J"Y9, 257.90 F.el I. eM rrv. pfr of M¢,m1-g Ihv3u S dr Aphe, m 777,00 I,eh, .fele. N P3Y01•W, W. S) let: -6.r..r 145.97 het F- P PIM .id,P, , e. I. 85.55 hoop lit & 1710'411131-1. 011-2 . 7.V. fen; l . lh T27.12 ,ter. Ieet mdw ewve leo, we I.nd. 119.80 feel; lune 3,1•11.07^E, 730.59 fen h d,. r,ue pen .f6ylmkl. LOT 17 Thd pwtlm of PM Merhma molar or 5oehm 30, T.rnhip 313 North, lone Id Ted. W.M., 91,0 . cNmov, Wmhi y,w..+,kh 1. hrndw 4 1 IF,. dn.rlhod r klle-e i,vkidne a Ore Nrt6y.M..me .4 rid Soort. 30, ot 2TIA pink4 the hvep.;r of bn.,"t Moan S 9109'35•W, 895.14 Free; thee, S WWN°W, 267.00 fell, Ph— 74411'@'W, 770.50 h.,; IN- N 46.4P26 -f. 782.4 Mr; Am,e. N 19'111-30•l, 15.36 to.. n oho NY, loot. of bepim;ap. Lot 11 TM prim d th. MP.hr,e quart•, a S..r;m 30, Tmexhlp 20 forth, limp 16 bar, VI -M., KhFNw Carry, Wwhsrpren -Kroh I, b.rid,d by .lie dewOhed It Idly -II 1•Y,ri-g .+ Nr fyr6m,o•, ell rid 5.c0im m, then.. S IHPPIW o'W, 1WA2 foot le PM Imx per IF b.Ill-log IN -S 8P74'30M', 1140.38 Feet' ,Meer SC29Wf, N4.62 h.y Ih.n. N 6434'17"E, 795.29 40, Ihm.. 516.18 frr,.ditto- IW*. we I„loth 105-80 loot -bee. N71.2049•F, 171.413 foto; It- 200 lk a sdhs -,IgW. ere 6ep6 111,48 FW; theme 5 73741.51-E, 150.37 fort; three 67.13 f.sr Mdta. curve 1.11, me I,rph 47.03 feet; pan.. N 6449'76.6, 916,9. how ro rho. lw. pdM .f by;i.,in. LOT 11 Ad pO!m of 4h. N.dMrt q,.d,r of S-N.n 30, tee.xie 20 Nath, R..,. 16 Eel, W.M., KI1111e, C-ly, W.W.MF n.44.1,;Obmnd.dly 1If...4.,1d .[fell.- IF Ph. Ne/b.r+.ler, el wid W19- 30, .1on1. S W-IrW W, L".6 N.rtb ba,•'dm, •f m&d S..Iir 2' 1743.00 fM bib, th lode! r 6.pim;np; thorn S 8P IN -. 31.11 Im, 1; role.. - 1.11,°E, 33Wh 9.2 16eM h— F1 GloWl 5.17 fed; eh..1 tte7 B feel ndrw. earn , 11 eh IPI. Po feel; ehonp N oft. "E. 171200 feel: tM.w N P29'70'W. 700.7.2 hs n rho -weplm of hrpinnin. LOT 20 Thor p -i. d A. Mrtho.d .pmt, d 5.a;r b, h .Np 29 Nrrh, Roop. 16 Ill., W.M„ Yihiht C.mry, M.Wrli¢n -arch 2, b-7. d b, a I.P. derrird a fol;-.: Ypimrn It l he. f--, OW4 5ro i- 30. ol- S WIC3rW, dap IN. North 6aa,d q of mild Swe;m n. 10110.m fool .. ire /N. mW .1 hork,:rp; PI-. S 1P tlr 1 , 117.00 kel: Ph- S IT IW9^F. 660.42 Ie+y Ih.re. N 64.16'29"E, 124.35 fry dun[.:hmu W eedl mel right, w. Ivor], 197.61 hot; demo N 0792'!37!, WOO Mr: Phrtea N 2'lY S4•IY, 570.14 Feet n the Poor pM' of b.pimly. LOT 21 TM pram .F Ih. Northra q-. el S..Pi- 70, T -.NR 20 rlmll., Req, IN Ea, W.M.. Kin iha C -v, woPMn1-m -hi.h it to-d,dby a the do -164 a Will: i.&AM rt&. N.nhea. ce,ne.f mid Secrkn W. 16w1e.5 6P19' W^ye, .Imo Ih North bear r, ui.dl Swe2r 3d, 31.7.00 kW k x„.rvr pin! of Mpiwirg d.e•.e s89'1497'W, IIi.W fen; rhos,[. S IT 1Fort, - 730.7 ha; IIW.,e6 S 7T 19'17.41, 710.56 0.0 role, 98,39 fear PdN....rve I.R. we I.o'It6 7108 foo; Ib,rce N 64'16.79"[, 283. W her; Ih.mo N 1T 1451'14, 660.41 Fed b d. In. pin! at lyinehg. LEGAL DEfC611TIONS FOR SANIGAN SpEINGS u.pl.n.0 LOT 19 Tho pnw, of Ph. Nath hell of Swum 30, T.wmkp 4 hhth, 1.,97 16 Fal. W JA„ RIMi1.. C.mq, W.-1laglm whkh h bmadp. b7 P 4itw NMHMd a IJ Ip.,_ IniWI-9 d try NothwN.xnP, of told 5x,7., 30" rod n.Pdg ,hap 5 UP 16'30"W, .bry 6,. hl.rlh b.u.tdeh Of.M SKIiP•. �. 3760.00 fed N Ifo hwpinl al6yimin%; limal- S IP 71'30•"', 49.j7 rig dm,ot 57-2P01•W, 69,79 fal; ,h—$6.76 rW tat.. • rlyhl, arc IwRlb 1l3.161.r11 IMS.. 54r5751'1. 91,71 IM; 4,.... 151.65 Fool end. wee left, art In,9th a1,11 kw1 ,her N Ir L004'L, 730.CH k,l N 1h. h.. pier dap,i.n;ry, LOT 23 "w potion fib, Nwlhwet gyto.F 7 'hen M. To..J,ip 20 rink, Root'. 16 low, W.M., Kfnfla ew•h. Wkddryam .I.le6 ;.1-Ilod by o Ire dm abed a fall..: 119[.1.y "h NWh.eO.dm,r.f odd S.erim 3D, thw N 1r 10'304, day 14. W.0%hemp I mid 5x11.20, 1116.91 loci SP 9e nu, pins of 6e9i^„Tory; ohne. N R1R3o•E. 612.17 Fey'hoar 5 V23'cs"W. 30-794-'r PhiP 557-11' 29 - W, InA2pehlh..0 70.0 Mew ladles coop dpbl' Prc loop. 33.03 Fir; thew N20 "54'4I V, 275.64 foot; Ihete, 3!2.61 k. r.4hu Nm I.h, .m la%1h 109.20 Fier, M ' nca N Ar WO W, 10.36 hey d t - {76.M fm "'.. e.,m I.", .e M.pri 106.79 Too" the'mp N 61.01.41""'', 276. 45 Feer b Ph, tai. pin, of f.41.1np, LOT N The pr,l. of Ile N.hno1 9,xl9t of lntol, 301 To.n✓,ip 20 Nath, limp 16 Earl, W.M., Klwb r.,..y. Wwhhy,m.hkN;, homd.d by. lin d,mt6ed m &Rma: kgImL,.g d try 14w1M.J eorea of mid Sxdm 30, fhx. N 19'17-30.1, a" rhe N..eh 6m.nduy N mid 9xta, W. 1233.00 F_N She faa point yr b"Imim tenni N 69• IW 3VC 47.60 fry thon 561'"''53!"E, 312.011..h 0e S3P39N"E, 529.47 My PM... N 375P02'W, 745.00 Fro N rhe oar poli d6c9iminp. Lai 45 That im"im of Mo hkth tgauh, of 5Pa4iW M. T*wAip 20 hurt, 1.rye 16 gmt, W.M.klttlim Calory, V&Abffw n.hl,b L. batdfdbr. Ilse 6e Llmd m kDom: M91mim .r Ifo. Nb11mM e.we 61 mid Sa11"' 30, Ila,sa N IS![— of , olm9 rh h1..,k MYnbry of mw MtCliPn 70, IMAID'FM; ilm. o S V115002% 743.0 153,1 m Mr l..e pain, of 6wllraf,W cries, 637.29'72'*, 74.96 loop ,6-. N S0SWO'L, .753.413 key Illa- N27-5fb1'Yl, Idp,00 faro; 11hp-241.0 foxrdl.Iww hO, orc Ferylh pari MW, N 47- I001'1Y. 1416.' lig thence 416.54 boo Pat even Mft..n 1 W1, 92.19 kw, /Mroe. 5 2M3924'W. eu79.47 M1 P. th. In. valei al hpimig. LOT 76 Th., peenm d the Nlutit t gmrl„ of Saila, 0, Ta.r.Np 32 Nook, Iaya 16 Pau, W,M., kinirm Carry. WPNdngeW �6io6 I. s.wd.d by a lbv. rWedb.d.. bll..y kll.IM,I try N.46.mt e9aa Pal aitl Loll. ]0, Ihvee N 6P 1030'1. .lery rhe Neth b.,"td.y d mW Leer,n 90, 1235.001mtI rh.x. 5 3r WO!^E, 100.5.00 her t. ,M ,an pin, of 6.100 lax trice 537.59'02"!, 4413.99 ker. Ihe,.ee N 36'36' 11"5 M,; ,hoe 131.23 .oei,e ... 1.h, Pee hPaprb 196,70 0.,; ,h.,on N H'S{'4I'Wal"W, ]4.b fe,y IheeP $ f S 34.36'13"W, Si1.65 IPak 1. th. toe plat of 6.6afi,%. LOT ?f Tlmt port- d 4h Nenh.we epmte. of s.e,;n 29, T,..W61p 90 N.nh, 1e'9. 162my W.M. CirtiPa C'.•"tY, wmFkdn which id lnw,d.d byP lin dmnlbrda k1b,.7: Narrhw'. comer of mid Spfi W 30, thee. N 89' 16.30'E,akM M, Pooh Iwmiwy M mid S..,r.n 30. 1235.901.1, ,rise S 37'WW"F, 953.96 kal e. Ph. I -paler of bool.4W th- 5 2eSy02'R, 373,99 4ew; Phme 746,29 kat ..dim corn 6911, 171.2 hay rherva N 63•7741'W. 273;011ex, Phir 91.5! I.w ,alio atom raw, arc I.ryd, 194.92 key d... 5 IP I4'49"W, 44.60 folre llot a N.00 kat fd1. woo, riaN, eta r -oh 39.n Ln, Phm. N 4r20y'W, 212.74 ker Ph— 50.91 foal fWke.mv. 9&' .. I.Vlh 111,51 k.,, ,lance N 61.3756"E. $74.99 M1 la a.... piM Pl bryinniry. WT 26 The pati- d Ph N.n1..0 q.mur of Lctl"' 30, f --- Mp 20 Nath, I.ry. 16 E.I. W.M.. Kht- lc_]V, Wst,iwa, which i. I smJW by . 0,., doe.ri6.d.1.11..., hpioui,g m rh. ,I_. ,..a it mid 5aitk. 30, crier N 19.1110"!, dory IF, Nath Samde,y of told Scalia, 30, 1235.00 Lay 'I.-" 5 3r/oro2•l, 522,00 Ie., m db. Irv. PW. d Fep3.N0, tbmo, S 3r SrCr E, 433_00 Ley chew S 61.32'56""', 414.09 hey- etre. N Stu WIV, 4103.00 look It-. N 3707-11'1, 95.93 Fra N lh hP. I.,. OE bepi.r'r,x• LOT i Thi WN- d h MA .J gmbr al stmHoo 30, 1arv.hip 59 Nook. 1age 11 Safe W,M., 9WN,Cwmy,W.,hirylwwbiah 1e bmoom! 17. On. A,.,Ihd m Ml...&d, mW da N.d,won .Peen air mid Saifip. 30. !Meta N IP 1@30.1, aIm%1h. N.A bawd., d mid $.nm 30r tl4.so Nil 4o -L roue Pane W beioaryl lb-. N $Y!$'30"f. 7M.40 4a: that, S 375902•'1.1 32J 00 Fin: Ikon Y 3P93.11ww' 505.93f"'; I=. Nlirspi1"W, 702,00 pate; A— 60.11 Fin adW curvy ler, m laplh 297.71 feel; Manu N 4741' 9"W, 0.1.33 h ' ,lane. 526.'7 #W a. nm k0, .. Inrdh 185.67 '6-„ r6N WOr23"Wr 207.36 Ew b nee 1 pmt Fbe/Mi . LOT 20 Thl Pati_ aM. 05311..,1 qu.br.r SxfiW 10, T_W., 20 Neth, F... u Lar, Wht., Kl1Phm ee...y. Wo,M„0ar ahkh k 653,., kO Fry . Ili drt.2od in yellow, Epknnkg a Ph Merth.4C e...x:F,wW SPalhm 30, a .kph pin 1,.ha emit pdnr of b.p6",ky: 01n.w N 17-111,110-11, IT the Nath awe,dwy PI and Smilm 3D. 325,04 16n11 thee. 5 96119'93"E. 190.001..; lbw 51P13'41W9. 939.62 low; Ph— N 31'1076""'. 130.0 Fin; Ph— r1 N 0134'S, 935-06 Fin ,e ten 4mo p.kt .fbyinNry. LOT 31 7h. yx1M dNN. hmtl..e.- %.mer F SeJl.n M. 1a.N61p M hkMy paep 16 Lent, W.M•, KI01N4 C -y, WmNVm wNch 1, hmded by. him deac,%ld a hll.m; kWwdry M tk. ricuth n ear-, .f mid 5.erlan 201 llo, S 9'3054oH, Nm try VW h tPoAt,y of old S -H. 30, 935.06 p.W; Iha�.6 W3VIVE. 170.00 6.1 N Ph r_ pia of bellming Eh_f 17-8026"1, 713.00 tar; rJ,e,.. N 16'4ff9'f, 745.0 kat, Phom. 461.931."' mA.. e.... lith, too 1e 693.67 het; ,hen,. N SP0Y23° , TI kW; thmne S 14'17531^W. 930.62 Fin k eh. Nw pa.1 daylrwLg, � 7 , , , FACE 4 Of 5 LOT 32 That ptlm d try. e,lnll.,rea, %turn .1 Soog-W, la.,gWp 20 Neth, R*,,t 16 EPN, W.M., KIP6., CotmaV, WahipdW .Neal, ha„d,d by P IIW d.,elih6 o AIN-: 3.ao.iry W 14 I4,d,.eR aalner d Pali Sr flw b, Mance S W W54 -W. dory try Wal bwPol,, , d mid $Page 3D, 935.06 hd, ft- S W311A^Er 45.110 fM t. Phe hu. pint PI bytndg; Ph— S 605'26"[, 60.00 Intl thim, N fd•5749`E, 610.30 Nary It— N 2wwlg^W, 97.00 to.; -hare 60.16 Eeat rosier nm I.h..d Inyh 119106 kn, ,hoer N 46•{1.51•"', ]63.31 den, then:. S 16.4'34"00, 785.0 1,.1 to 1h w, olm .Ib4nniM LOT 33 Thar pMW o1,b, kWk..., q.-., d 5-6. 3D. T..,dh1p M 0„16, Am." 16 Far, yW.. kh11N. C"'ah. WahM9,m r•• • ;ubwNed hY a lino druibd abllwe 6gI.;.v m th, Nr$.wr• caner d mid 3P.14. 30, these S 34'S4•W, aloe The Wevleud drry mid Sxtm 30, 931.06 Mer. 1tma. S 97-31'21.1, 0.91)5.0 h., N raw ,.Le pe:N d 6ginninp ,hn.e N W3749 -F. 611).311 kn1 rK-. 511.53'11"F, 347.00 MJ; Wa. S sr 14'40W, 513.49 f..1, FLmn N 34• IT -01-W. 365.41 Wt ft tiro hue p,dnt W h.g1,aIV. LOT 34 Thal Patio .1 fin Nenhwnl =¢.�� , of St90Pn A 7 -Alp 20 Noah, Flo- 169w. RIA.. Kl"h.. Comic. WWIJMp whkah i. 6.,md.d by P line dewW,d m 1111 « Ie*Ary a ,h f haav wPou W add SxW"' 30, ?hence S 7-I4W'W, dap Ifo Wal bwn4r7 41 mid Sx,kan 80, 935,06 Mos Ph -S W 3026"E, S05.01) fees, If— S 34.11'01"F, 3535.95 Fid 1P th, hues pint.f 6yi.ryrys IkrrcP S as•11'01'E. 364,00 Nott thea:. Nd7-42'4'E, 626.39 fairy ,hart N4r2P'D"w, 110.0 fen; three 00.91 Not ardia cava tight, a: bmyh 207.91 pry Ihm. N 2M53111"w, 68.001..y Ph— S 6r 14'4'W, 596.49 hrct N d. rto. p.W 61 bghdeq. L0135 Tlw fm„im dlh N,Mhax1 gmrM d SeWsat 3p, T.impNp 51kd6, k,7i, l6 EeR, W.M. RIfIiNt [.vnlyr Wa,lirgl....6kA i, bmMrd by o Ile daelih4d m kllesa; T.pinnoa M Ifo• hle,d,weN n.....f.u! Cation b 1 dY.s, S 7-71'!4'"'. alma the Wee k•wW,9 timid S.eY 70. 955.06 kpll ,I,fne.SOS•St'26'F, SW.OG hey ehme, S 94'!!'61'1, 769.93 I- N to km Paid d 6ykdryl Ihw 5 W WOVE. 374.00 foot, r1.- 343.97 bmf rdiaeam eyrie arc lanplh 91.373 hW, IMw N 06'3571"Er 777.45 her, ,thee 94.00 147 11 ha nm Ieh, t, ft. a 72.06 bar, that; th 22.400951 92.31 kJl Mal; 147,11 hm1 Ndh,hWm ft, art .Myth60.95 or, ,here. 07-51'41.16 17264 ra Mmee 30"01) fees ,.dw.xw MR, .N kglh 77.46 kers Ih.x. N {r7057•W. 17!.61 fwli lhwo S 60'414.40"W, aTh.n 153 Po lFe w. pernrN bdid.lry, LOT 36 Ihnl pan. aero NWN-1 m of SPM. 30, loo -hp 20 hkgih, b-5. 16 Feu. WJN., KIP" I. Cwnh, W.W,pioo ,bi.h 1, ho.ndd by o 13w dmadhd e.bllamt kpimdg ol.h N. "' max or mid 5xtim 5D, then S (It U "', .1.% rho WNond ber, of mid Lae.. 30, 935.61."'; lhnx. S R7-3y-2P"E, 9,.3.001.1; Ph—5 34.1 I'01`E. 673.95 het N the I. plot el MprWdogl Mai. 574.11.111'1. 470.00 Nn, Ihmm, 313.91 Not mdo, m lith, a,d 1~K 0.93 der, Ihx. 5 3r47 10 Ma, 19-W, 191..1; li c. !29.76 053 NmY, Wm l.fr, arc W.Ph 107.70 Fiat; !hone 21).6 fent rod . - ri1N, amlo.06 41.0 eery s..a. N 41 -4-W, 560.64 kw; I'— 2DAD Not NWm dory, tyld, am M0h 13.66 Tar; 8-45.00 bJ r.&...ar+a I.h. Pm lo,,,h 33.34 Oen; rhm.. N 9.379'1, 416.02 iron N Plot h... Piro d 6.p6.kg. LOT 37 Thai peril"' d try. N6rtk"W"1 quaere or s trim 30, ra..lhip 2O 67th• A.V 16 Fa, NEM•' Mimi eaa6y, WSMrq- „hick h Imo adod by. [hen ti-Amd m Nil-: 1141.1g at 16 Nar6w6d comoo d Wd 5-11on 30. fh,a. S 0'3654•"' dory dm W.. 6e 11dry d mid 5.9. 5, n5.06 Eom, rhmtee 5 M'WM'F. 2.7.0. r.1 to the mu pin, d 6..;.rIM; ,loot 361'33"24"E, 136,00 Fin; rhe.s.ssP 11-01-L673.95 Coro; ,hem" sM•ar53wF, 440.1)4 ker• Eh 45,00 5.r tadiu, .one 10, on: legh 50,93 hay ,hent, N71923`W, 775.35 f.53 Pa Ifo ten. p1. d a.drariry: LOT 31 Thi, Fewim d A. N,nb.al'moot of SmtM 30, Tamddp M hath, Nn9e 16 Envy KM., Kill[.. Crony, W.,Mgfw .N4b n bemWod by O lent 0 m 16.d r r.7-...; 54mr.p W 06. Hw,kt eo Mtmf .Fid 5e.4m 30. teen, S P34'3T'M'..kry do WntIma dny amid Jo,j.m 70, 9225.09 root n Ifo Im, peat dbW,k,Jryi deme 50.34 -Woo, ?9.W im,. *..a 5 32.•44'54.11, 5747361..1; lhnco S d0'3013'E, 14.0 Nod, then.. 43.001.,ror- erergk.am153%1141.%hel; f.-N7'I5,now, 775-35 loaf 6.e. Nvirw ^w, 30.0 he Po tri 1537 Poin, 06 .6odn' LOl 31 lht patloo r4k, bmt6teN 4..aPd, d Seerron W, roa„hip 30 Noth. horya 16 Eos, WM., Kkrtib, Camly, WaNgta, which it banded by a Doo d,I.d6.d at lallam. Myl.ig at the What *et.- of old Seel. 70, 16- N O'WJA'L, 4M.001-- to phe t,,m piN aI h,fa.nkgd Me.. N P]4'54•E. 975.M I.a1, ll a 5V44 -AVE, 94,M'b.y rhe„ 16V5013"4. 14.00 Int, it... 45.OD Marod.a sat Fih, aN kick 16.55453; then oe MOO Mtalk. neva dpbl, o,r kg,h 13,16 Oen, -lona 5 47.26.54.1, 15.00 kite; ,Neon S 5pVA6-W. 603.63 r7-, w,h 1wP aPW Pf1mol.dg_ LOT 4 Thi poi. d.h Nth- Wat,rd 5.r-- 30, Tan.ldp A Neth, b1,, 16 [oo, WM. RhNmt Cr,.y. W.,W.W- wMdk I. bm,MN by .line d.adb,d a 611- Npimiry .10. Waal poen, d.,rr .f mid SxRm 29. m .loch pNN p eh Imo Paola al hpi-krmi fheea N M3o54"E, JB0.00 ker; chase N 003746"1, 27x.45 Paw llama. S lt•d&31•E, N4.DT hot: th.,c. N 66.2P41'W, 129.02 For. Opm, 93.43 fepr rod.. turn I.1,, re I.yN k 123.52 er Ph_ S 2r27'M•w, 151.0 ker, Phme S W040 -w, 213.M ha N rho Ito, piN all b.pkm[a LOT 42 Thal ptlm .f the Movi .d q.a m, d Stollen 30, l -Nit M N.h, begat 16 Ed. W JA., Kigir.. Canny. W.hlryrm +hhh I. bmnd.44 .16. dameW4. F.111- Iml.iry ,ithe War quatx m r P1 mrd Saari. 30, lh60a N N•23•brE, PI jPh, Srorh bosh if mW h Imoot q,o,ior St.%frn N,1.. N. pun, of b.ymi W Phut. N 6r7,747 -F, 9320.24 hat, I)— N 3d•4WE1rW. 781.11) her; Ihai.. 3 3P4719' W, 191.60 hot, A— 227.75 fr1 Nm.t aures rah, om hrNlh 101.11 foot, Ramco S lr30'49'W, 141.03 hey It. - 00.27 ba radf. cart righi, - I -p 1, 120.9 1.111 16-, 5 W31'19 -W, MI.97 !tai{ lama. 144.93 1.a .diw ad,.. tide, ac kglh 113.97 hail ,hone N 6P20a1"W, 149_02 kW, k= 13.42 1- oidbn curve 1.0, an: Wwh 35.25 fon; I)w" S 2 prprlo. 122.90 res m 6. leu, pan, d 6ryi.lry. 3'07 i.,L 7Acl s of 5 LEGAI, DESCRIPTIONS FORp SI• 11'6'- S; NIGAN SPAIN OSI.,• Fel rr6V 2 r^ 771623 LOT 41 fir, pw;u, I r6i hWlh..rrl quem, M 5n11an 30, T -&p 00 Pkdh, Ran" le Ear. W.M., 13fiin, Cmlmy, Wlyhi,rpl.n .63116 it bwndrd by n ]ia dueli6rd a SlIIon: 611AnkA n tM Will, quarin11230011, n1 mid 71,0000 30, 1411,, N 73,1'0.9-, .lap Mt Wnt hwtl.ry NWS, .3.00 irl; ?hare N WM,"' L, ]78.Y her p the liue P•1•" it I.ginnirg; IFne• N 56.1710"E, 235.00 f..y th- S 4176.34•9, q6. W feel; IFaa 80.00 km fid" w,.e ,i3M, we 6.0h M19 A-; :61.11. S 13 -W49 -w, AS." h<1; shun 70.27 k. rr -. cwe ,gear "tc .lnrrh 65.01 Ir.,; rh.,r. S 66.07' 19"W. 701.97 h.,; 16rnr 64.m SAI nsn 00.,11 ,1.61, erc IrAVK 69.01 kat; ]him, IN 111,411,31-W, 396.01 WI -m Ino PO W al brq;a,i.p, LOT 43 fbn p.1. 91 IIT N -h-1 "-, n Speaa 3D, fn.ndllp M hbrrh, Lan" 16 IW. W.M-, K1 h:rw Caunry, WwNnMm width it t....1d.d by s Ike ,111,+36,1 o. Flllewu M6i"M n ,hp Wul q.ads <wnn el rid Sn1'rn 723. Illm,.e. N 0177'40"E , 1610.70 0µt n rM :p.. 023:24 al6p,ml,rg; 5 66'3119'1,t 140,90 fIll.,8N., 83lli- 7,1n72U.9700 11N.n1w ]9Ilift,3,, a.rt•1Im. 1.111, IV. 1!7 t, drrar Iwl; 7600,13 31.18'05 •f, 76.80 hat N 1111 0,123 ptrd of iginbirg. LOT Y the pn;m of I6t N.rth.Arl lam, of 5r<tis, 30, E9pahip M North, 'bat" 16 E"P, WA,. KIM. -awry, Wanhlryrm W. 1.hrdrd 85. line Ik.:ik,f-6di-i Nsimin n Ile W.. 9- 111.;6 Sw16,, 110, 0- N 3"77Y•E. oknp IM 5-6hw.Naryof aid 1.031 7008.931.h r. rhe ran pin rf hpk,dryl Marr. N 0'4956'9, 511.16 few, 16- N 47'3N44W, 510.94 hat; rhac. 151,00 low 'a r W - 19M, An lowh 63"0 F"rj IS..e 5 6.5979•., 19,,;5 hM: :9-1..11. 6 31'A•,14F, 1001.90 bar n rh Ir„e pwnl 1f 6r0i.n1.9- LOF 45 Thor pnatm .trh Nr,thwnr gwnrr.l UWm 30, T<.nddp 30 MWh• Aa" 16 Emr. W.M.. KMf.w Cnp,1p, Wahhplon wFkh k hntd.. by • I' 40'.06.6 n IN. Sn FaLia,h.per Ih. W.1 Wenn 20 I.. el Ali S.eskn 30. 06232311 N 8.7}40'9, chap M. Smlh Iwn4ry d9- rid NWi, 7031.90 Ivry da.rA N 0.4436'9, 711,60II.t N h owe p4nf of br96minp; rhe,rcl N 13.4.51.9, 800100 q.r; Mab Ni09'I [•E. 6.67 hetl; Fhwa 5138.89 1001 rud11r. r.rvr ,3124, arc ImpM 23.5 be:; dwa. N17.374MW 773.24 h.tr hh, .. hnplh Y.7 1-,, 0-S 18.14'4P•W. I IE,77 hoop r41n<A f 8.57'41'9 , 101.97 kN; drag. 107.11 IpI w/iw wow ,1624, qm 14np16 113,19-..r; M m. S 2 4&M -W, P2.51 MI; Ill.. 194.06 fial..Wa wrv. door. - MmM 93.110 Flit; lmrr 3 47'W47"E. 910.h Flat .0. Lan pW .1 bepipiM. 5LI19EY014 CEAtIFICAU IN',.rid aid ""' d.fu;pda. -11"rpeuen a.urv1E mad, by mr ar kMu nP, ..I- in rmkumn:r nM 161 nqa ii-, if 16 S. -Y 4r".rdh,51 A111n I-w-ak D vip AMEAth6 (h.1Z43,44615) FRED SWADIFIOOI Irak 31.39.40 R 411 DOLIGLES KILIAN (oak 31.35, 36 A 37) KINMOIS $NOWMO11L1 AMOCM11014 Del, 30.74,;: 6337 DAIIMN OOL06M11 N 1119-, 37175 a 996 ROCSER IHWl1T Dia. 24,73 A 261 KLNNITN L. GOOMNOW 0.1170,71,37 A 731 GERALD.. Pah Is. 10, a 195 INARAY URZA Qa. 13. 11, 16 a 17} MFtl AIA*" Oil. A. 10, 11. a 1T DARMLL GOLOSMI711[IN. 5,6,7. a Ei SIMIEN LYONS IW. 1,3,3, a,1} ;e Aloe of 1915. Rh� anNM Lend SAneyw N.. 9,106 Amo n, 197s 7 M$MENT PROVISIONS NIAIN ROW Em -1 Lr. d0 bat.rip.F kid.15.1111. W No:j..l 0"0011. r -it M dlhn da "t th idl.ain� d-addammnnn Eeciminp .t. pin 70-96 tai, N 1V77411"E d da Slwh. ami I rh PA W S.rran 30, T..nddp 10 NwM, A,[. 16 but, WJA-, 13W1., ,amyl WnrWMyk llrnce N27•b'7"L1 .1" a;d.a din,, 138.896rrq Still r.6. A- 53.43 lee. wM rich,, we 1n01, 00.39 fiat] Ihna. S 6VM41 •L, 179,07 Fath rhnn 114.63 Nn ,di...... I.h, 1N I. 01, 24.30 trot; MPT. N AWN' 19"9, 301.97 Slid, 0- 100.27 hw ,d1.. eww (.h, ae IMyIh 92.761wri Ihn,rr N 1431169'0, 77.00 hat b A Pd. d.dpmld . POINI A. 0-, N 1]7049'1, 69.87 kr, rhena 837.75 foal .edin a„rw d9N, arc InmM 117.901,1; Ih.rce N 39•,17194, 191,80 MI; 1S- 317.97 Iwo radio. m,.. A# , as Ir7:h 147.24 hr,: 16rnee N 1111'30791, 35,43 N.I. R..nu 124.00 bntwt,. --IAh, .K 6.01693.0SIAN; ,60,23 N 77'10' W"E' 97.51 hat; 177.11 fw -A.. - kh, erc I.npM 97.46 hey Ibw,q Al "01'61•W, 1®.181wr ro • pehp ,1,,,2423,1 m PONT k lace N W 24.49"E, 120.0 f.q thou 61.57 k"r redia - fi9M, erc Ia,9lh 83.98 fwl; thein S 3.37414, 773,04 fw, Ib-. 37[.30 km.1dl..eww I.,, - i wk 393,0! h.lt ,hw,er N SNS6' I!'Er 384,111 Feel la. pins dwipn9lad s POINt r, roil.. N 52456'15"9, 85,65 Iso; 11623,, 161.78 fmr roil. <yry9 kR, ph Im3167,11.63 6116 Ihrcr N 2"51'41 NJ, 19J.ro fA.1 b • pkr dedl.red e. roINI D, Il..a. N SN'11[9-'Er 100.78 H.ry lana 92376 bw ndhn eww rip., erc Iaplh 88.35 fM; 7611011 S 6417 51'[, 97.78 k+k th.r<A 191.05 her ..din wn614R, ere IWglh47.66 kae; :hma S 73' Ibl1"E, 710.55 hat; ,6.111 678,39 Iyer �w p.rva Agh An 011110th 95.36 F. Ihnc. N N' IY49'lil 4IWO far; ,hoer 999.56 AW rodiur swve dpFr, h I e N 99.90 hat; 63,.17 N ID•0N39'E, 1.26 Amit k a Pike d A. Nd 6 a th W. E. r4 16 N 80.0679•[• 167.17 fen; ?Fur. - 48 kat 1- ... feA, ue ,..916 99.]9 kik ,01,1,0 1'106'36'17"f, 429.29 M,; 16wa .6.10 k11 ildlwau.re ricin, ora hglh".65fx1; 1U.. NWlP20H"E. 171.13 fwI, la.a. 275, 9S 1ee1 Ipoln wm r{0N. w" Ir,%t4 99.41 kat; ?lance S 711'61.51 •E, 150.5 fin; 14- 97.13 feN rdw. eu... I.h. .,e Ipylh 97.35 bey I1.n.. N 46•49-76•E, 319.110 Fel -S,. .w I and --t. MEMEW A L.airmin ., q "k, dratlsr.d. Pd NT A, Alic. N 41.7051•W, 097A0 Ml N a pins .here Add ,saint k 45 fall k di di -0- Ma a eWdra". aide Ad- Wig Mr ..d nf.14 3n.anl A. MEMEW 1 43Ii%Inn..I., drknWld n POINT AL th- N 4MIPR-W, Mo. 16 kat; Ph - MOM fen Mo., mow d9M, an Irplh 199.7,1 1.0, p6e,r<N 24'3y 1p'W. SW.O Ede; ;1-.:631.181..: rdi...1rv. hh, arc Iii lh 199.39 keV, :hnra N 46.41'5624., 343.371..1 I!, a 4%.131a: mm: ane 1111, me Imylh 97.07 Oat; Ihl", N-WW23•W, 151.38 hat W lt.and d de l..rnarr 9, EASEMENT C Eegil iv,it. p.ln deJo,.1W b POINT C. 1623,. 56Y,49'TS•E., 249.8 NA:; Ihr.. 5 9.3.4(1• W, 115.61 60, :hie. N W IS'WE, 365.51 Nag Ilrn. 135.40 Slot M&,, - fthr, as fin th 95,79 ker Mare S Slwwll1.11, 239.87 fM N n piM ah- mid .1.le.et i. 45 1 ., il. dl dinninn k A -.-Id-, aitl .14,,' hp., 16 rM.1 old lamest C. MSLMkNI 0 Wminp M e path d"WoW n POINT D, IMI.. N 20PMAI• , 33040 kat; ,623,1 243,0 Im, tadih n. ITh, a" I.µrh 99.44 lea; Rape. N 4r 18131'1. 1419,311 6115 IM-. 4.6.51 4nAI ,Adk, rurw FA art kill, 24.99 Flat; Ihrrrr N 6YMIR-W. 379.73 IW k 12.11 And.I rid Eprrrel D. EASEMENT E hliwdn3 n . pain: .,.I .d a POINt E, Mona 5 NFlI `E, 30.00 het: 0- 96.12 kat rodis corn I,6, as 1r.ph 01.97 WI, thmct 5 645656"1, 373.119 hat; viii a 3111 NAI ,.di. r,r.p dphl, toe Iuy0. 99.45 hell IMnc. S 51•IL•17•[, 771.13 hs5 01... 1D7.967.n rota, urw rphr,erc I.np1h93.71 fnry Is-. Sw 169h•W. 143.13 Ion; 0- 399.81 fen rdm .ww AAA., a< 7-i 11 W.OF ht.: I/.ne. S I417'D9w . 76.591-., 1)— 73,04 Slid nWw euro kh. pro Iaplh ®.N Iay Ihrne. S 4P34101"E, 709.23 Fill N • paim alai a;d n:trnWn h u hM k all dirsltml N hm a <uHe.r, aid rtAd.- b6N rh and of a1d F,w,am E. AI1pITOkk IFIGiTk FII. jynr ,1100,,1 7601,10`" _�Y d.y n A.p., "fir ;n 1•+�� d"t yep.+ ��. r, � . 2311 i Ili nPea a- f 1ER8�d d opt,U �. KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: December 10, 2018 ACTION REQUESTED: Board Direction to prepare enabling documents to set a Public Hearing to Receive Testimony Regarding the Proposed Vacation of Micheletto Road on the December 18, 2018 Agenda Session BACKGROUND: Micheletto Road is a gravel road accessed off of Swauk Prairie Road. The road is fourteen feet wide and approximately 0.34 miles long. The County has used the end of the road as a turnaround for numerous years. Recently, the road was gated prohibiting the turnaround of Public Works maintenance vehicles. It is our understanding that current owners no longer desire Public Works maintenance support. INTERACTION: Public Works RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare enabling documents to set a public hearing for 2 PM local time on January 15, 2018 receiving public testimony on Public Works proposal vacating Micheletto Road at the December 18, 2018 Agenda Session ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Map LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director �y S .T 3 Y` IROAD NAME BEGINNING ENDING :LENGTHTROAD WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY 1NlDTH SURFACE TYPE MAINTENANCE MILEPOST MILEPOST eo] (feet DISTRICT IICHELETTO RD 0,0 4.34 0.34 fiOFT GRAVEL g JA i iF i!A 4.0 + t' I m� 9 4 04aLfj}ind ro AN Roaft A. I t� F41-L*l ONIMA •+•r•. tiCI3c G11!, •� KgrrrJ All �iTf - • - • ppiY:A:7f i