Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-05-22-minutes-public-works-study-sessionKITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Public Works Study Session Regular Meeting Monday May 22, 2017 -1:30 PM Commissioners' Auditorium 205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg 1. Call to Order 2. Public Works Gravel Road Grading Business Practices 3. Request to Approve a Resolution to Adopt the 2017 Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 4. Request to Approve a Revised Ground Lease between Kittitas County Public Works and the Kittitas County Sheriffs Office for Lot 2 of the Boat Ramp Short Plat, Vantage Washington 5. Request to Approve a Resolution to Award the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program 6. Other business 7. Adjourn Created on 5/19/2017 8:54:22 ANI KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION MINUTES COMMISSIONERS' AUDITORIUM, 205 WEST STH ROOM 109 - ELLENSBURG Regular Meeting MONDAY 1:30 PM May 22, 2017 Board members present: Chairman Paul Jewell; vice -Chairman Laura Osiadacz; Commissioner Obie O'Brien Others: Mark Cook, Lucas Huck, Candie Leader, Public works; Dan Carlson, Stephanie Mifflin, Community Development Services; Neil Caulkins, Prosecuting Attorney's Office; Tony Buhr, Daily Record and One (1) Member of the public At 1:30 pm Chairman Jewell opened the Public works and Community Development Services Study Session. Additional items were added to the agenda: Road Standards Variance Committee Update; Bar 14 Road Bridge Update; Floodplains by Design Workshop OTHER BUSINESS Chairman Jewell stated that there is a Floodplains by Design workshop on Friday, June 2, 2017 in Seattle. Chairman Jewell asked staff if they were aware of the workshop. Mark ,Cook commented that he was asked to speak at the workshop; however, he feels he isn't the best person to speak at the event. Chairman Jewell asked if any staff was going to be attendance and suggested that Community Development Services send a planner as he plans to be in attendance. Discussion was held. Mark Cook asked to discuss another item under other business': Road Standards Variance Committee Update. Mark Cook stated that during a previous conversation with the Board of County Commissioners that the committee would not be restructured and that there is value in the citizen input component of that committee. Mark Cook continued that the concerns that were had were proposed to be addressed by filling the one remaining vacancy and conduct an educational meeting to review the bylaws and goals of the committee. Mark Cook added that last week discussion was had with Neil Caulkins and Commissioner Osiadacz related to requests for site visits on projects and creates issues of fairness on the applications. Discussion was held. Mark Cook stated that approximately ten days ago under an emergency permit and with Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife staff on site, Public Works had equipment in water at the Bar 14 2017-05-22 MINUTES Road Bridge, Marx Cook continued that approximately four hundred yards of material was removed from upstream, downstream and at the bridge itself in an attempt to open the clearance under the bridge. Mark Cook added that crews were unsuccessful in clearing the obstruction. Mark Cook stated that flows rose and crews retreated from the project. Mark Cook commented that one more attempt will be made to clear the obstruction on Wednesday. Discussion was held. PUBLIC WORKS GRAVEL ROAD GRADING BUSINESS PRACTICES Mark Cook stated that this year has presented a unique set of circumstances in where the weather has been more wet than normal. Mark Cook continued that the wet conditions put the gravel road maintenance behind schedule. Mark Cook added that putting our equipment on the roads would do more harm than good in performing maintenance operations. Mark Cook commented that staff did not communicate the delay to residents of these roads and the complaints that were received caused staff to acknowledge that an internal discussion of looking at gravel road maintenance practices. Mark Cook added that the Maintenance Manager explained that the left over deicer product from winter maintenance is utilized on gravel roads as a base stabilizer. Mark Cook continued that he plans on adding a proposal to the next budget cycle to perform this action on the gravel roads in upcoming maintenance cycles. Discussion was held. REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2017 KITTITAS COUNTY ROAD SAFETY PLAN Lucas Huck presented the final draft of the 2ui7 Kittitas County Road Safety Plan for Board consideration. Lucas Huck stated that after compiling the data within the plan, eight projects were identified with a county wide safety improvement project being at the top of the list. Discussion was held. Chairman Jewell called for a motion to approve Resolution 2017-092 to Adopt the 2017 Kittitas County Road Safety Plan with amendments as discussed. Vice -Chairman Osiadacz made a motion to approve Resolution 2017-092 as amended with Commissioner O'Brien seconding said motion with discussion. Motion passed 3-0. REQUEST TO APPROVE A REVISED GROUND LEASE BETWEEN KITTITAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AND THE KITTITAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FOR LOT 2 OF THE BOAT RAMP SHORT PLAT, VANTAGE WASHINGTON Mark Cook gave background on the project and reported that the previous lease that was approved by the Board of County Commissioners contained errors in the square footage. Mark Cook continued that those errors have been corrected and an updated 2017-05-22 MINUTES lease is before the Board for approval. Chairman Jewell called for a motion to approve a Revised Ground Lease between Kittitas County Public Works and the Kittitas County Sheriff's Office for Lot 2 of the Boat Ramp Short Plat, Vantage Washington. Vice -Chairman Osiadacz made a motion to approve the revised lease as presented with Commissioner O'Brien seconding the motion. Motion passes 3-0. REQUEST TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE 2017 ANNUAL PAINT STRIPE PROGRAM Lucas Huck stated that Public Works solicited bids for the 2017 paint stripe program and the Engineer's estimate was $246,309.40 with the low bid coming in at $233,936.10 which is below the Engineer's estimate. Lucas Huck continued that two bids were received with Stripe Rite, Inc. submitting the low bid. Chairman Jewell called for a motion to approve Resolution 2017-093 to Award the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program. Vice -Chairman Osiadacz made a motion to approve Resolution 2017-093 as presented with Commissioner O'Brien seconding said motion. Motion passes 3-0. Mark Cook added that a change order can now be done to add striping and fog lines at Hyak. 2017-05-22 MINUTES KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Laura Osiadacz, Chairman BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2017 - �J . TO ADOPT THE KITTITAS COUNTY ROAD SAFETY PLAN 2017 WHEREAS: Public Works received a $54,000 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant in 2015 to update the adopted 2014 safety plan; and WHEREAS: In accordance with Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) 2017 Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) County Safety Program call for projects, the County Engineer has prepared a Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017; and WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017 identifies prioritized locations for low cost, beneficial, county wide safety improvements based upon crash data, roadway investigations, engineering judgement, and risk based analysis as set forth in WSDOT's HSIP call for projects; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby adopt the Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017, hereto attached, as now submitted by the Kittitas County Director of Public Works and County Engineer. DATED on this 22nd day of May, 2017, at Ellensburg, Washington. Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik of the Board- Mandy Buchholz CIO St/VASIH`N4G����f�����, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Obie O'Brien, Commissioner 3N Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017 May 22nd, 2017 Kittitas County Public Works Department 411 North Ruby Street, Suite 1 Ellensburg, WA 98926 Introductior The Kittitas County Road Safety Plan is a comprehensive program of safety improvements aimed at reducing fatalities and serious injury accidents across the entire county road system. This program of improvements was developed using a strategy similar to the Washington State Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2016: Target Zero, in which crash data is analyzed to identify accident trends and contributing factors, and then sites within the road system are prioritized based on a risk-based ranking system. Safety improvement projects are then developed to target spot location and systemic improvements that provide the greatest benefit to the traveling public by preventing potential fatal and serious injury accidents. Due to the sporadic nature of crashes on rural county roads, it can be difficult to determine trends using past data alone to choose good locations for improvements. However, past crash data can be used to predict future crashes by evaluating the contributing factors and targeting improvements for roads with similar characteristics. This is why Kittitas County has decided to utilize this strategy to allow for a proactive approach that benefits more locations throughout the entire County road system and is more cost effective than just focusing on past crash locations. Data Analysis Data used for this evaluation was provided by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The data includes detailed information about crashes on Kittitas County roads from 2011 through 2015, including a comparison of how Kittitas County's roads compare to other public roads in the state, this is detailed in Table ! below. Although overall, fatal and serious injury collisions occur at a similar rate to other public roads within the state, Kittitas County is committed to reducing these types of collisions and strives to collaboratively achieve the statewide goal of zero deaths and serious injuries on Washington's roadways by 2030. This Safety Plan focuses on identifying cost efficient safety improvement projects that offer substantial safety benefits county wide, and reduces potential fatal and serious injury collisions along Kittitas County's roadway network. TABLE 1 2011 through 2015 Collision Comparison Kittitas County All Counties -Co. All Public Roads Maintained Roads Collision Type # % of # % of % of Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes # Crashes Crashes Fatal 5 19.2% 632 0.234 2,188 19.9% Serious Injuries 21 80.8% 2,067 0.766 8,813 80.1% Alcohol -Related 10 38.5% 838 0.31 2,684 24.4% Total # Fatalities 5 679 2,378 Total # All Injuries 224 32,265 230,395 Total # All Collisions 656 --- 67,137 --- 523,186 The 2011-2015 WSDOT provided collision data was further evaluated to determine the predominant crash types and contributing factors. As shown in Table 2 below, the predominant causes of fatal and serious injury collisions in Kittitas County are "hitting a fixed object" and "overturning." Crashes involving fixed -object hazards, or non -traversable roadside slopes within clear zone accounted for 53.8% of all fatal and serious injury collisions. Additionally 26.9% of the fatal and serious injury collisions were caused by vehicles overturning. Unprotected roadside slopes steeper than 3HAV are considered non - traversable and contribute to overturning accidents. The predominate conditions where fatal and serious injury collisions occurred included higher speed roadways with less than desirable lighting conditions and where roadway curvature was a factor. This accident data seems consistent for a county like Kittitas where the majority of the roadway network is rural without lighting features. Accidents tend to be more severe when speeds are higher and where low light conditions hinder driver acuity, especially in horizontal curves where drivers are more likely to leave the roadway. Non - intersection related collisions accounted for 65.4% of the fatal and serious injury collisions, which is also consistent with the amount of roadway lane miles versus intersections existing within the Kittitas County roadway network. For the fatal and serious injury collisions accident report details please see Appendix A. TABLE 2 2011 through 2015 Crash Data Fatal/Serious Injury Collision Types and Conditions Ali Counties - Co. Kittitas County All Public Roads Collision Type Maintained Roads (Run-off the road) # %0 f # % of # % of Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes Hit Fixed Object- Roadway Ditch 3 21.40% 153 13.10% 307 9.70% Hit Fixed Object- Ran Over Embankment 3 21.40% 110 9.40% 273 8.60% Hit Fixed Object- Earth Bank 2 14.30% 108 9.30% 230 7.30% Hit Fixed Object- Fence 1 7.10% 102 8.80% 199 6.30% Hit Fixed Object -Guardrail 1 7.10% 49 1.70% 237 7.50% Hit Fixed Object - Utility Pole 1 7.10% 136 4.50% 284 9.00% Hit Fixed Object - Tree 1 7.10% 281 10.30% 589 18.60% Hit Fixed Object- Luminaire Pole 1 7.10% 4 1.50% 50 1.60% Hit Fixed Object - Drawbridge Crossing Arm Gate 1 7.10% 1 1.50% 1 0.00% Total Hit Fixed Object 14 53.80% 1,165 43.20% 3,159 28.70% Overturn 7 26.90% 311 11.50% 965 8.80% Light Condition - Dark, No Street Lights 5 19.20% 788 29.20% 1,791 16.30% Light Condition - Dusk 3 11.50% 96 3.60% 339 3.10% Light Condition - Dark, Street Lights On 2 7.7 251 9.30% 2,370 21.50% Light Condition - Dawn 1 3.8 48 1.80% 162 1.50% Total Light Condition 11 42.30% 1,187 45.70% 4,836 44.00% Non -Intersection - Not Related 17 65.40% 1,815 67.20% 5,963 54.20% Road Curvature -Horizontal Curve 13 50% 1,038 38.50% 2,868 26.10% Over Centerline 2 5.30% 485 12.50% 1,215 8.30% Motorcycle 5 15.20% 570 15.40% 2,215 13.20% Posted Speed at 50 mph 22 73.30% 878 25.80% 1,663 11.20% Risk -Beed f*rinritifitfflrl Methodolt9iw Run-off the road crashes have been identified as the predominant collision type in Kittitas County and are occurring at a disproportionately high rate as compared to other public roads in the state as shown in the crash data provided by WSDOT for 2011-2015 that is reflected in Table 2. Because of that, this plan will focus on roadside safety improvements to reduce the severity and number of accidents on Kittitas County roads where it is most likely that run-off the road crashes will occur. From a safety perspective, the ideal roadway is straight with roadsides that are flat and unobstructed by hazards. Straight roadways eliminate the need for drivers to navigate curves, reducing the chances of 4 running off the road. Providing the recommended clear zone and roadside slopes allow drivers to safely recover control of a vehicle in the event they do leave the roadway and helps ensure fixed -object hazards do not cause fatal or serious injury accidents. The aforementioned roadway geometry and clear recovery area is the goal in improving roadside safety but is often cost prohibitive due to the geography of the area and is not supported by rural character or practical design. In cases where it is cost prohibitive to eliminate roadway curvature and create an unobstructed traversable roadside, alternative improvements that may reduce the severity of an accident or alert a driver to a hazard should be considered. This safety plan focuses on roadway segments where low cost high benefit improvements can be implemented. These improvements include breakaway features on posts, guardrail deployment, bridge rail retrofits, rumble strip installation, and signing and traffic delineation upgrades, all of which can be implemented to reduce fatal and serious injury collisions. Based on the crash data for 2011-2015, 90 percent of the total crashes involved roads with an ADT of 175 or more and with a speed limit of 35mph of higher. In order to have the greatest potential impact in reducing collisions, the County considered roads for evaluation and prioritization for safety improvements with the following characteristics: MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR INCLUDING ROAD SEGMENT IN SAFETY PLAN: • Paved (ACP, HMA, or BST) • ADT of 175 or more. • Posted speeds of 35 or more. • Collision at this site in the past 5 years. The minimum criteria include the preliminary eligibility requirements for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) as stated under the 2017 County Safety Program: Call for Projects. County road segments with the characteristics listed above and road segments that were on the previous safety plan were evaluated and scored as shown in Table 3. The resulting road segment prioritization is shown in Appendix B. 5 TABLE 3 Scoring Criteria and Weighted Scores Item Number Factors and Collision Types Score 1 OVERALL CRITERIA MET: Meets minimum crite,ia and was included in previous hazard elimination pan 20 Meets minimum criteria but not included in previous hazard elimination plan 10 Does not meet minimum criteria and was included in previous hazard elim. plan 5 2 Inadequate clear zone with steep embankment or ditches (no guardrail) Over 50% of the side slopes are too steep 20 About 10% to 50% of side slopes too steep 10 At least one section has side slopes too steep 5 3 Fixed objects in clear zone (fence, utility poles, tree, mail box, etc.) Over 50% of the road has fixed objects in clear zone 20 About 10% to 50% of the road has fixed objects in clear zone 10 At least one section of the road has fixed objects in clear zone 5 4 Roadway Curvature — Horizontal Curve Over 50% of the road is in a horizontal curve 20 About 10% to 50% of the road is in a horizontal curve 10 At least one section of the road is in a horizontal curve 5 5 ONE OR MORE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURY COLLISION(S) — 2011 THROUGH 2015 Fatality 50 ea. Serious Injury 40 ea. b 1 INJURY 15 ea. flewtopment of Road Segment Safety lmproveane:ntt- After roadway segments were prioritized using the risk-based scoring as described above, the results were reviewed and the list was shortened so the plan could focus on the segments that would see the most benefit from safety improvements and eliminated erroneous results or locations reflecting outdated information. Road segments with a score lower than 60 were removed from consideration. Road segments that were within the scope of current improvement projects or recently completed improvement projects were also removed. Each accident report was examined for further details regarding the incident to further identify contributing factors, driver actions, alcohol or drug influence, intersection related, and any countermeasures already in place. The list of candidate locations was further reduced by eliminating roadway segments where accidents were alcohol or drug related with no hazard at the site and segments where countermeasures were already in place and or where no countermeasures would have prevented the accident. The remaining roadway segments were then evaluated for potential safety improvements. Safety improvements that emerged from this evaluation included guardrail installation, signing, and additional delineation at spot locations to prevent run off the road accidents, and various intersection improvement projects. Additionally the County has identified a need to address copious amounts of inadequate bridge railing. There are a total of 268 bridge structures within Kittitas County, many of which have insufficient railing or no railing at all. Because these observed hazards have a high potential for serious injury or fatal accidents, Kittitas County has chosen to be proactive and include these locations in this safety plan to prevent predicted future crashes. This preventative, systemic, risk-based approach is supported using the FHWA Systematic Safety Project Selection Tool criteria, which states that a site can be identified as a candidate for safety investment if it has multiple risk factors but no crash history. Finally Kittitas County recognized a need to collect data to support a clear zone inventory for the entire county road system. The effort to identify hazards within clear zone for the purposes of creating this safety plan included utilization of a variety of tools, including Mobility, Google Earth, RoadViewer, and field visits. Future safety improvement projects could be better identified using a more thorough clear zone inventory targeting known hazard locations. For this reason a planning project has been identified 7 as part of this safety plan to collect clear zone inventory data, which will create a roadside hazard database, and identify potential countermeasures. Prioritizes Lost Ettective Safety frnproverrleiit Projects Road segment safety improvement identification used a combination of spot location and systematic approaches. After improvements were identified, they were prioritized based on the potential for crash prevention and greatest benefit, as supported by engineering judgement. Kittitas County evaluated the scoring, and road segment safety improvement results to find high risk, sizable benefit countermeasures to group together as County wide safety projects that promptly provide the biggest benefit for the most efficient cost. By focusing on similarities in the roads and their needs, safety improvement projects were formed rather than road focused projects, allowing the county to better reduce the possibility of fatalities and/or serious injuries. Locations with similar geographic vicinity, or projects with similarly proposed improvements were grouped together to provide efficient contracting and cost effectiveness. A summary of the Safety Improvement Projects can be found in Table 4, followed by the details for each project including preliminary scope and locations of the proposed work, and an estimated cost for the improvements. Notes regarding the engineering judgment that effected project prioritization can be found in Appendix C. Roadside Hazards ClearZone Inventory HuntzingerRd Bridge Rail -Code 1 Bridge Rail -Code 3 Denmark Rd Bridge Rail -Code 2 Corridor& Intersection Table 4 Prioritized Project List # ego 19K A Z m a m 4 w 3 m E y to 'Q m d F C u` O N EE :: � R Cr S N = FQ p u b ii lY1 E & 3 '6 ICU E i Z C r, p .� Li c u1 E= M C c E :: I d LU W O CL 55550 THORP CEMETERY RD 0 3.02 24 50 289 10 0 5 10 0 75 100 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 29 5.05 20 35 300 10 10 10 0 0 30 ' 60 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 577 764 26 50 471 10 10 5 20 40 0 85 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 0 3.51 26 50 180 20 5 5 20 0 15 ' 65 21560 SALMON LA SAC RD 175 10.59 30 35 578 10 5 5 20 40 45 125 22710 WESTSIDE RD 2.14 3.94 22 35 1454 10 10 10 10 0 30 70 26180 CASASSA RD 0 112 22 35 341 20 10 20 20 1 0 0 70 34383 LOWER GREEN CANYON RD 0 0,28 24 50 247 10 5 0 5 0 45 65 1 93526 REECER CREEK RD 0.26 0.312 49 35 2500 10 0 5 20 40 15 90 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 4.87 5.33 26 50 730 30 0 5 5 0 45 65 41271 ' BRICK MILL RD 4.1 4.87 20 50 396 10 5 1D 10 40 0 75 42000 NANEUM RD 2.54 4.11 20 50 372 10 0 10 5 40 15 80 93526 REECER CREEK RD 4.8 6.68 24 50 376 20 0 5 10 0 60 95 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 1.01 2.55 26 50 873 10 5 10 0 50 30 105 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 3-PHASE 1 BRIDGE RAIL-CGDE 3-PHASE 2 2 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 3-PHASE 3 CLEAR ZONE INVENTORY-DATA COLLECTION 3 63501 DENMARK RD 308 4,35 20 50 312 20 10 5 20 40 0 95 63501 DENMARK RD 0.5 3,08 20 50 319 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 4 75040 HUNTZINGER RD-PHASE 1 2.7 4.88 24 50 889 10 20 20 20 0 0 70 5 75040 HUNTZINGER RD-PHASE 2 5.14 699 24 50 734 20 20 20 20 0 30 110 75040 HUNTZINGER RD-PHASE 3 6-99 1074 24 50 371 20 5 20 20 p 0 65 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 2-PHASE 1 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 2-PHASE 2 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 2-PHASE 3 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 2-PHASE 4 6 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 2-PHASE 5 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 2-PHASE 6 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 2-PHASE 7 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 1-PHASE 1 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 1-PHASE 2 7 BRIDGE RAIL-CODE 1-PHASE 3 94001 VANTAGE HWY 21.3 23,36 38 50 586 10 5 0 20 40 15 90 94001 VANTAGE HWY 408 5.57 28 50 4930 10 0 0 0 80 75 165 94001 VANTAGE HWY 112 16-56 26 50 376 10 5 0 1 10 40 p 1 65 94001 VANTAGE HWY 2.77 4-08 28 50 5486 10 0 5 5 40 30 90 8 96951 KITTITAS HWY 152 2.36 28 50 1565 10 0 5 0 0 60 75 96200 NO 6 RD 0 0-26 24 50 2305 10 0 10 0 0 30 50 Roadside Hazards ClearZone Inventory HuntzingerRd Bridge Rail -Code 1 Bridge Rail -Code 3 Denmark Rd Bridge Rail -Code 2 Corridor& Intersection 1. Roadside Hazard Safety Improvements This project provides for safety improvements on 14 different road segments to lessen the severity of run -off -the -road accidents by installing guardrail where necessary to protect roadside hazards. Signs such as advanced warning signs and chevrons for roadway curves, upgraded stop signs at intersections, and other delineation devices will be installed as recommended per MUTCD requirements to also prevent run -off -the -road accidents. This project is the highest priority for Kittitas County because it addresses the most common type of accidents on multiple roadway segments that scored high in the risk-based prioritization. These cost effective improvements provide benefits to a number of locations, thereby improving the roadway network County wide. 2. Bridge Rail Improvements -Code 3 a. Phase 1 -County Maintenance Districts A -F L 19 bridges or structures b. Phase 2- County Maintenance Districts G -I L 21 bridges or structures c. Phase 3- County Maintenance Districts J -L 1. 20 bridges or structures Due to the large number of locations needing improvement, it is cost prohibitive to provide improvements for all locations in a single project. Because of this, county -wide bridge rail improvements will be executed in a number of projects. Each priority will include a number of locations that are grouped by County Maintenance Districts, and sized to be manageable phases for design and construction. The projects were then ranked based on the inadequacy of the bridge rail and then by the location in which the greatest benefit would be achieved. Although not identified through the risk-based prioritization scoring, this project is a high priority for Kittitas County due to the number of locations observed to be at high risk with the potential for high severity accidents throughout the entire county road system. The potential accidents that this project would prevent are serious injury and fatal accidents. The County has identified this widespread hazard and is taking a proactive, systemic approach to reduce future potential accidents. 10 There have been 60 bridges rated as Code 3; this rating reflects bridges with timber railing or no railing at all. Of all the bridges identified with substandard rail, these bridges or structures have the highest vulnerability because they provide no protection for an errant vehicle. 3. Clear Zone Inventory Through the data collection process and analysis of this safety plan, it has been identified that an inventory of clear zones in Kittitas County would greatly benefit the process for future safety plans and project proposals. Up to date and accurate data allows the county to better identify future project locations that support the goal of eliminating fatalities and serious injuries on the road system. Although it has a lower priority than actual projects, it is a low cost proposal that could actually aid in the reduction of cost of future projects. This effort would include field data collection, database creation, and potentially scoping level mitigation opportunities identified. 4. Denmark Road Safety Improvements Improvement of a sharp corner with steep embankments at MP 3.57 would aid to prevent run- off -road accidents on this specific road as it has a history of accidents at this location and was identified on a previous safety plan. The priority level is lower than other projects because it only targets a specific location and road characteristic. The county included multiple road segments to provide improvements to this entire roadway corridor, from MP 0.50 to MP 4.35 which includes bundling bridge rail improvements to the project for efficiency and cost effective contract letting. S. Huntzinger Road Safety Improvements a. Phase 1 -MP 2.70 to MP 4.88 b. Phase 2 -MP 5.14 to MP 6.99 c. Phase 3 -MP 6.99 to MP 10.74 Huntzinger Road had several segments of road that scored high on the risk-based prioritization. Although there is no significant accident data to reflect the hazards, the road characteristics of the road show several areas of curves; both vertical and horizontal, steep embankments and no shoulder which are the largest contributing factors to run -off-road accidents. Guardrail, signing 11 and delineation improvements to this corridor are cost -prohibitive so the county has prioritized the phases in order of mileposts. This project is a priority for Kittitas County because it prevents most common type of accident (run -off-road) and scored high on risk-based prioritization, and because recreation opportunities are rapidly increasing along this roadway. It is a lower priority than other projects because we are already addressing the first roadway segment in a project to be constructed in 2017. 6. Bridge Rail Improvements -Code 2 a. Phase 1- County Maintenance Districts A -D i. 6 bridges or structures b. Phase 2- County Maintenance District E i. 16 bridges or structures c. Phase 3- County Maintenance District F L 17 bridges or structures d. Phase 4- County Maintenance District G i. 21 bridges or structures e. Phase 5- County Maintenance District H -I i. 14 bridges or structures f. Phase 6- County Maintenance District J -K i. 14 bridges or structures g. Phase 7- County Maintenance District i. 12 bridges or structures The second-highest risk bridges or structures were rated as Code 2. These bridges have railing that does not meet modern standards for crashworthiness and do not have approach railing. Many of these bridges have w -section metal beam rail and steel posts attached to the outer edge of the bridge deck. This is a design that was crash tested and approved by FHWA in 1959 and has since been discontinued due to a tendency of the concrete deck to fail at the post connection upon impact, allow errant vehicles to continue off the deck. Bridges that lack approach railing do not provide any protection to an errant vehicle that leaves the roadway just before the bridges. There are 100 bridges that are coded 2 throughout Kittitas County. As with 12 priority 2, this project will be broken into 7 phases to create more manageable projects for design and construction. 7. Bridge Rail Improvements -Code 1 a. Phase 1- County Maintenance Districts A -D L 2 bridges or structures b. Phase 2- County Maintenance District E i. 1 bridge or structure c. Phase 3- County Maintenance Districts F -L i. 15 bridges or structures These bridges were identified with lower risk because they feature bridge rail and approaches; however, the rail and/or approaches and terminal do not meet current standards for crashworthiness and will need to be upgraded to maintain adequate protection for errant vehicles. There are 18 bridges and/or structures that have been rated as Code 1. These structures have rail and approaches yet do not meet code. The priority is low on this project as the bridges are functional but will need updated railing in the future to assist in preventing serious injury or fatal accidents. 8. Corridor and Intersection Safety Improvements This project provides corridor -wide improvements for the entire length of Vantage Highway with intersection improvements for No. 6 Rd and Vantage Hwy. As well as two other intersections along Kittitas Hwy at Matthews Rd and No. 6 Rd which have been identified for safety improvements. Both Vantage Hwy and Kittitas Hwy are high -ADT corridors with an overall roadway that is in good condition with appropriate countermeasures in place. This project would provide monitoring and identification of potential spot -improvements to areas within the Vantage Hwy corridor that may warrant updated safety features. While several segments of Vantage Highway scored high in risk-based prioritization, the evaluation of the accident types did not. Kittitas County recognizes that improvements to this corridor may provide benefit to a great number of travelers, and any improvements that could reduce potential future crashes are 13 beneficial. This corridor is not substandard in a safety regard when compared to the entire County road network, and in most cases safety hazards are not easily identified. Kittitas Hwy has recently undergone large scale improvements. The county is taking the opportunity to evaluate the countermeasures recently installed for performance success to see if intersection related accidents decrease. This will allow for identification of whether or not additional countermeasures may need to be implemented at the Matthews Rd and No. 6 Rd intersections of Kittitas Hwy. The combination of accident history at No. 6 Rd and Vantage Hwy along with a site visit brought this segment into the list of projects. The Vantage Hwy/No. 6 Rd project would include providing an adequate clear zone, signs and possible realignment. Monitoring and evaluation will also continue at this location to identify potential safety improvement opportunities. 14 Priority #1: Roadside Hazard Safety Improvements ESTIMATED COST $690,150 j 1 r { v 01 1 J Guardrail, signs and delineation -$585,150 • Thorp Cemetery Rd has three sections of inadequate railing that requires replacement and curves that need delineators and/or signs from MP 0.00 to MP 3.02 • Thorp Prairie has two segments selected in the safety plan. One segment has curves that need guardrail, signs and delineators between MP 0.00 to MP 2.0. The other segment has a curve with a steep embankment that may require guardrail along with signs and delineators between MP 5.77 and MP 7.64 • Lower Peoh Point Rd has steep embankments and two curves in need of guardrail and signs between MP 2.90 and MP 5.05 • Salmon La Sac Rd has guardrail, signs and delineators but a portion of the road is reflecting accident data that identify the need for additional guardrail, signs and/or delineators between MP 9.0 and MP 10.59 • Westside Rd has a segment between MP 2.14 and MP 3.94, just outside the current project that also has curves and steep embankments that would benefit from having guardrail, signs and delineation installed. • Casassa Rd is a very curvy and steep road with steep embankments and very little countermeasures in place between MP 0.00 and MP 1.12 Signs and Delineation -$105,000 • Lower Green Canyon Rd has two curves near the intersection of Hwy 97 that needs chevrons as well as advanced warning signs between MP 0.00 and MP 0.28 • Reecer Creek Rd near Dry Creek Rd intersection between MP 0.26 and MP 0.312 needs advanced warning signs to identify the intersection. • Reecer Creek Rd has curves in several segments that need advanced warning signs, chevrons and/or other delineation between MP 4.80 and MP 6.68. • Wilson Creek Rd reflected a need for delineation to reduce run-off road accidents between MP 1.01 and MP 2.55 • Wilson Creek Rd has curves and a previous realignment into an intersection that requires advanced warning signs, chevrons and delineation between MP 4.87 and MP 5.33 • Brick Mill Rd has had several intersection related accidents that could be reduced if advanced warning signs were installed near the Fairview Rd intersection between MP 3.93 and MP 4.87 Naneum Rd requires advanced warning signs and installation of a larger stop sign for an intersection with Brick `" 0 Mill Rd between MP 1 2.54 and MP 4.11 �a�s�} Priority #2: Bridge Rail Improvements Code 3 • Phase 1 is within County Maintenance Districts A -F with 19 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $559,914 • Phase 2 is within County Maintenance District G-1 with 21 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $524,418 • Phase 3 is within County Maintenance Districts J -L with 20 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $597,233 wow • Bridges that have been coded 3 are severely inadequate bridges or structures with wood rail or no rail at all. • There will be three projects by geographic location of code 3 bridges to allow for manageable and cost conscious improvements. 1E - -1 !-- f .. 17 Rik ,I • Phase 1 is within County Maintenance Districts A -F with 19 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $559,914 • Phase 2 is within County Maintenance District G-1 with 21 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $524,418 • Phase 3 is within County Maintenance Districts J -L with 20 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $597,233 wow • Bridges that have been coded 3 are severely inadequate bridges or structures with wood rail or no rail at all. • There will be three projects by geographic location of code 3 bridges to allow for manageable and cost conscious improvements. 1E - -1 !-- f .. 17 Priority 3:Clear Zone Inventory ESTIMATED COST $75,UUL + Data collection of clear zones on Kittitas County road system to create hazard database and identify potential countermeasures. Inventory fixed objects within the clear zone, such as utility poles, trees, irrigation structures, etc. 18 MSCI aaq ib�f @!!+Ry i � R �1CWi6Sl1o0 P �srrgs 6 ! — �rNF*�Tks69YY'y 6 M — IHXeMI f. 4 M�G9T x- �=xa r + Data collection of clear zones on Kittitas County road system to create hazard database and identify potential countermeasures. Inventory fixed objects within the clear zone, such as utility poles, trees, irrigation structures, etc. 18 Priority 4: Denmark Rd Safety Improvements ESTIMATED COST $385.684 Denmark Rd from MP 0.50 to MP 3.08 has several structures in need of adequate railing. • Denmark Rd from MP 3.08 to MP 4.35 has steep curves, both vertical and horizontal. The road narrows greatly at the corner with steep embankments on both sides of the road. The countermeasures in place are minimal and no rail is present at the corner. 19 Priority 5:Huntzinger Rd Safety Improvements V r � -iAIPV �Ceeb. • Phase 1 is between MP 2.70 to MP 4.88 has several horizontal curves, steep embankments and no shoulder in places with minimal countermeasures in place. 0 ESTIMATED COST $540,000 • Phase 2 is between MP 5.14 to MP 6.99 where there is steep embankments, no shoulder in areas and need of guardrail, signs and/or delineation. o ESTIMATED COST $540,000 • Phase 3 is between MP 6.99 to MP 10.74 with sharp horizontal curves, vertical curves, steep embankments, very little to no shoulder and inadequate clear zone. ESTIMATED COST $540,000 ZU Priority 6:Bridge Rail Improvements Code 2 • Phase 1 is within County Maintenance Districts A -D with 6 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $766,927 • Phase 2 is within County Maintenance District E with 16 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $948,625 • Phase 3 is within County Maintenance District F with 17 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $974,967 • Phase 4 is within County Maintenance District G with 21 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $1,032,990 • Phase 5 is within County Maintenance Districts H-1 with 14 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $875,433 • Phase 6 is within County Maintenance Districts I -K with 14 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $754,201 -:.. • Phase 7 is within County Maintenance Districts L with 12 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $548,920 • There are 100 bridges that have been coded 2 } for inadequate rail with no approaches. • There will be seven projects by maintenance districts of coded bridges to allow for manageable and cost conscious improvements. 21 Priority 7: Bridge Rail improvements Code 1 • Phase 1 is within County Maintenance Districts A -D with 2 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $389,540 Phase 2 is within County Maintenance District E with 1 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $938,840 • Phase 3 is within County Maintenance District F -L with 17 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $429,573 • These bridges or structures will need upgraded rail and approaches to be brought up to standards to prevent serious injury or fatality accidents if collision should occur. 22 Priority 8:Corridor and Intersection Improvements No Cost -Monitoring Stage Only i SYs.r CAN. - Vantage Hwy has countermeasures in place but is also a road with higher ADT with increased probability of accidents. • Monitoring and identification of possible spot fixes throughout the corridor 23 • Kittitas Hwy has had safety improvements recently constructed in previous projects. The county would like to observe the recent improvements before enacting future safety projects. The two intersections that will be the focus of this monitoring project are at Matthews Rd at MP 1.56 and at No. 6 Rd at MP 2.36 • No. 6 Rd intersection at Vantage Hwy may benefit from intersection related countermeasures, monitoring and evaluation will also continue at this location to identify potential safety improvement opportunities. 24 25 APPENDIX A FATAL and SERIOUS INJURY Collisions in Ipttitas County IBM:m a c v Egrd`m v Z tt Tn O = x e w c m e m n IA CU d = O 01 O 1 O 1Q p O1 2 FATAL COLLISIONS E121763 8/20/2011 WESTSIDERD 4.1 Y DveSt Embankment Y Y Y Y Y Y 26 1265 35 Treee o eorr Stu m Fence E144064 2/18/2011 WILSON CREEK RD 2.3 Y y Y 26 1429 50 Over Embankment 2866428 5/4/2012 LOOK RD 1.45 Y Roadway Ditch Y Y Y Y Y 28,1100 50 3202514 1/3/2013 FAIRVIEW RD 0.39 Pedestrian Y Y 122 22 292 50 1201 2711015 8/20/2014 COLOCKUM RD 18.5 Y Earth Bank Y Y 12 SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2866168 11/14/2011 DENMARK RD 3.57 Y Over Embankment Y Y Y Y 1 22 219 50 E179966 7/9/2012 WHITE RD 0.03 Y Y YY Y 28 292 25 2866172 9/27/2012 NANEUM RD 2.54 Y Roadway Ditch Y Y Y 2C 334 50 E254795 7/4/2013 VANTAGE HWY 13 Y Y Y 26 448 50 E256367 7/8/2013 VANTAGE HWY 3.01 Y Y 26 3609 50 E256366 7/9/2013 SALMON LA SAC RD 9.15 Y Over Embankment Y Y Y 30 578 35 Light 2866344 10/23/2013 BULLFROG RD 2.03 Y Y Y Y 28 4264 50 Tree or Stump 3202611 12/7/2013 BRICK MILL RD 4.1 Y Fence Y Y Y Y 20 272 35 E315336 3/19/2014 COLOCKUM RD 0.17 Y Y Y 20 50 E320254 4/11/2014 THORP PRAIRIE RD 5.99 Y Roadway Ditch Y Y Y Y 26 471 50 E329914 5/25/2014 REECER CREEK RD 8.5 Y Roadway Ditch Y Y 18 228 50 E335016 6/9/2014 VANTAGE HWY 5.57 Y Y 28 4930 50 E335626 6/14/2014 TEANAWAYRD 1.01 Y Earth Bank Y Y Y Y 24 271 50 E338378 6/22/2014 VANTAGE HWY 22.5 Y Guardrail Y Y Y Y 38 586 2867878 7/16/2014 VANTAGE HWY 4.48 Y Y 28 4930 50 2867809 10/12/2014 REECER CREEK RD 0.31 Y Y 49 2500 35 E419344 4/23/2015 NELSON SiDING RD 0.79 Y Guardrail Y Y 28 343 35 E427284 5/24/2015 PARKE CREEK RD 0.9 Y Uti1Lty Pole/Box I ty 28 550 50 E482019 11/6/2015 ROBINSON CANYON RD 1.2 Y Y 22 769 50 25 26 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION c 0 'a a � o o � Z u 3 � l0 a C R 7 H O CLI +a+ d u r Ln co Q 0 m 0 m y 0 5 ii :ftZ E .w N n't cc Q Iio _ Ln N 8 N m a toa O m a } m a O d c ,�., N w _ aa+ _ .l . r _ 94001 VANTAGE HWY 4.08 5.57 28 50 4930 10 0 0 0 80 75 165 21560 SALMON LA SAC RD 1.75 10.6 30 35 578 10 5 5 20 40 60 140 94001 VANTAGE HWY 2.77 4.08 28 50 5486 10 0 5 5 40 60 120 22710 WESTSIDE RD 3.94 4.17 26 35 1265 10 10 10 20 50 15 115 63501 DENMARK RD 3.08 4.35 20 50 312 20 10 5 20 40 15 110 75040 HUNTZINGER RD 5.14 6.99 24 50 734 20 20 20 20 0 30 110 28500 TEANAWAY RD 0.73 7.29 24 50 271 10 10 10 10 40 30 110 92275 BULLFROG RD 0.72 2.03 28 50 4264 10 10 10 20 40 15 105 93526 REECER CREEK RD 0.26 0.31 49 35 2500 10 0 5 20 40 30 105 94001 VANTAGE HWY 21.3 23.4 38 50 586 10 5 0 20 40 30 105 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 1.01 1 2.55 26 50 873 10 5 10 0 50 30 105 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 5.77 7.64 26 50 471 10 10 5 20 40 15 100 55550 THORP CEMETERY RD 0 3.02 24 50 289 10 0 5 10 0 75 100 23030 NELSON SIDING RD 0.48 1.82 28 35 773 10 0 10 20 40 15 95 42000 NANEUM RD 2.54 4.11 20 50 372 10 0 10 5 40 30 95 93526 REECER CREEK RD 4.8 6.68 24 50 376 20 0 5 10 0 60 95 22710 WESTSIDE RD 4.17 7.29 22 35 919 20 10 10 20 0 30 90 41271 BRICK MILL RD 4.1 4.87 20 50 396 10 5 10 10 40 15 90 40761 LOOK RD 1.34 1.84 28 50 1100 10 5 10 10 50 0 85 93526 REECER CREEK RD 6.68 8.7 18 50 228 10 5 5 5 40 15 80 94001 VANTAGE HWY 11.2 16.6 26 50 448 10 5 0 10 40 15 80 63500 FAiRVI EW RD 0 0.98 22 50 292 10 10 5 0 50 0 75 96951 KITTITAS HWY 1.52 2.36 28 50 1565 10 0 5 0 0 60 75 54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 1.2 2.72 22 50 285 10 0 5 5 40 15 75 75040 HUNTZINGER RD 2.7 4.88 24 50 889 10 20 20 20 0 0 70 92275 BULLFROG RD 2.04 2.7 28 50 4405 10 5 20 20 0 15 70 26180 CASASSA RD 0 1.12 22 35 341 20 10 20 20 0 0 70 22710 WESTSIDE RD 2.14 3.94 22 35 1454 10 10 10 10 0 30 70 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 0 3.51 26 50 180 20 5 5 20 0 15 65 96937 UMPTANUM RD 3.1 5.22 24 35 403 20 10 0 20 0 15 65 75040 HUNTZINGER RD 6.99 10.7 24 50 371 20 5 20 20 0 0 65 34383 LOWER GREEN CANYON RD 0 0.28 24 5D 247 10 5 0 5 0 45 65 96200 NO.6 RD 0 0.26 24 50 2305 10 0 10 0 0 45 65 X41" 6 WILSON CREEK kb 4.87 5.33 26 50 /30 10 U 5 5 0 45 65 96400 CLEMAN RD 1.7 4.25 30 50 978 10 10 10 0 0 30 60 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 2.9 5.05 20 35 300 10 10 10 0 0 30 60 69370 PARKE CREEK RD 0.81 2.61 28 50 550 10 0 5 5 40 0 60 24510 UPPER PEOH POINT RD 0 3.16 34 35 1271 10 5 5 10 0 30 60 43132 THOMAS RD 0 1.51 20 50 317 10 0 10 20 0 15 55 26 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION 43883 COOKE CANYON RD 40600 BRICK RD 12650 KACHESS LAKE RD 22710 WESTSIDE RD c LYONS RD 95301 MANASTASH RD 64756 UPPER BADGER POCKET RD 92275 BULLFROG RD 22512 0 93526 REECER CREEK RD 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 95611 BROWN RD 92275 BULLFROG RD Al CANYON RD 96400 CLEMAN RD 75040 HUNTZINGER RD 96951 C 96951 KITTITAS HWY 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 96200 NO.6 RD 40315 N N THORP HWY NORTH U MANASTASH RD 69370 PARKE CREEK RD 42271 ALFORD RD 21900 GOLF COURSE RD 21900 GOLF COURSE RD 95600 HANSON RD 12650 KACHESS LAKE RD 96951 O 40761 LOOK RD 95301 MANASTASH RD 40315 SANDERS RD 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD L i.i 13700 C 25620 WATSON CUTOFF RD 25480 WEST FORK TEANAWAY RD W d 10 0 5 20 0 15 50 w 0.72 28 ; 'o 10 0 5 20 0 15 50 u 1.09 20 35 218 10 u A 0 0 sn 50 2.26 4.8 28 50 r Q 0 L Q 5 0 30 50 m 1.55 24 50 1739 10 d 5 5 0 A K 1.81 aN-1 18 16 y 10 10 C U. G 426 G C O ik z 2.04 10 'i N M Q 1A ~ 1O 43883 COOKE CANYON RD 40600 BRICK RD 12650 KACHESS LAKE RD 22710 WESTSIDE RD 40772 LYONS RD 95301 MANASTASH RD 64756 UPPER BADGER POCKET RD 92275 BULLFROG RD 22512 LAMBERT RD 93526 REECER CREEK RD 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 95611 BROWN RD 92275 BULLFROG RD 96076 CANYON RD 96400 CLEMAN RD 75040 HUNTZINGER RD 96951 KITTITAS HWY 96951 KITTITAS HWY 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 96200 NO.6 RD 40315 SANDERS RD 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 95301 MANASTASH RD 69370 PARKE CREEK RD 42271 ALFORD RD 21900 GOLF COURSE RD 21900 GOLF COURSE RD 95600 HANSON RD 12650 KACHESS LAKE RD 96951 KITTITAS HWY 40761 LOOK RD 95301 MANASTASH RD 40315 SANDERS RD 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 94001 VANTAGE HWY 13700 VIA KACHESS RD 25620 WATSON CUTOFF RD 25480 WEST FORK TEANAWAY RD 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0 2.04 24 50 1 196 10 10 20 0 0 15 55 1.12 1.22 22 35 1775 10 5 5 5 0 30 55 0 1.76 26 35 244 10 5 5 20 0 15 55 0,25 2.14 34 35 1331 10 5 5 20 0 15 55 0 1.49 18 50 260 20 10 20 0 0 0 50- 5.58 11 22 35 567 1 10 10 10 20 0 0 50 1.27 5.61 22 50 305 10 0 5 20 0 15 50 0 0.72 28 35 3545 10 0 5 20 0 15 50 0 1.09 20 35 218 10 5 20 0 0 15 50 2.26 4.8 28 50 688 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 0,43 1.55 24 50 1739 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 1.81 2.68 18 50 720 10 10 10 20 0 1 0 50 2.03 2.04 10 50 4264 10 0 20 20 0 0 50 3.02 5.47 40 50 2128 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 1.4 1.7 28 50 1259 10 20 20 0 0 0 50 0.24 2.7 24 50 437 20 5 20 5 0 0 50 3.36 3.82 28 50 2315 10 0 10 0 0 30 50 3.82 4.87 28 50 2349 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 0.34 0.59 1 22 35 889 10 20 5 0 0 15 50 3.58 5.1 22 50 715 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 0.5 1.03 20 35 1216 10 0 20 5 0 15 50 6.54 6.63 24 35 370 10 0 20 20 0 0 50 0.74 1.36 26 50 1532 10 10 10 0 0 15 45 2.61 4.64 22 50 242 10 10 5 20 0 0 45 0.15 1.02 22 50 594 10 10 20 5 0 0 45 0.11 0.42 28 35 2335 10 5 10 20 0 0 45 0.42 0.89 28 35 1056 10 5 10 20 0 0 45 0 0.81 28 50 1206 10 5 20 10 0 0 45 1.76 3.4 26 35 244 10 10 5 20 0 0 45 1.34 1.52 28 50 4407 10 0 5 0 0 30 45 0.69 1.34 28 50 1271 10 5 5 10 0 15 45 3,56 5.58 22 35 509 10 5 20 10 0 0 45 0.13 0.25 20 35 2117 10 0 20 0 0 15 45 3.65 4.42 26 50 471 10 5 5 10 0 15 45 18.5 21.3 26 50 586 10 5 5 10 0 15 45 0 2.22 24 25 104 5 0 20 20 0 0 45 0 1.12 22 35 283 5 10 10 20 0 0 45 0 1 0.68 24 50 185 10 5 10 5 0 15 45 3.35 4.72 24 50 687 10 0 5 10 0 15 40 27 28 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION L O C U � C � y' N d � � C V tj m 5+ °Or' G 3 O J3 0 LL D C cu at md z E N N LL M oG � iN 1!1 � to 8 w) a dp a ami a 6 E E E E E a N E m e ad m � A. r ate+ r & ate! N 53650 BARNES RD 0 0.78 20 50 307 10 10 10 10 0 0 40 41271 BRICK MILL RD 3.22 4.1 20 35 272 10 0 10 5 0 15 40 63500 FAIRVIEW RD 0.98 1.94 22 50 2067 10 10 5 0 0 15 40 94051 GAME FARM RD 1.04 2.54 20 50 244 10 10 20 0 0 0 40 54250 KILLMORE RD 0.18 2.44 20 50 200 10 10 10 10 0 0 40 42271 ALFORD RD 0 0.15 28 50 543 10 5 5 20 0 0 40 95611 BROWN RD 1.16 1.8 20 50 748 10 10 10 10 0 0 40 95600 HANSON RD 1.5 1.96 28 50 475 10 0 5 10 0 15 40 40761 LOCK RD 1.84 2.88 28 50 1000 10 5 5 5 0 15 40 23030 NELSON SIDING RD 3.04 4.37 28 35 343 10 0 10 20 0 0 40 13530 SPARKS RD 0.41 0.89 26 35 766 10 0 10 5 0 15 40 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 1.74 3.35 24 50 687 10 0 5 10 0 15 40 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 4.42 5.14 26 50 471 10 5 5 20 0 0 40 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 5.14 5.77 26 50 471 10 5 5 20 0 0 40 96751 THRALL RD 0.15 1.1 26 50 1267 10 5 5 5 0 15 40 96751 THRALL RD 2.18 3.14 26 50 864 10 5 5 5 0 15 40 94001 VANTAGE HWY 2.53 2.77 28 50 6140 10 0 0 0 0 30 40 63501 DENMARK RD 0.5 3.08 20 50 319 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 7.69 10.4 20 50 257 10 0 5 20 0 0 35 31510 HUNGRYJUNCTION RD 1.74 2.84 20 50 953 10 5 20 0 0 0 35 54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 0.09 0.96 20 50 815 10 0 10 0 0 15 35 68910 BADGER POCKET RD 0 0.57 22 50 639 10 0 5 5 0 15 35 69511 CLERF RD 0 1.88 24 50 543 10 10 10 5 0 0 35 43883 COOKE CANYON RD 2.04 2.55 22 50 196 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 95600 HANSON RD 0.9 1.5 28 50 1069 10 5 10 10 0 0 35 42000 NANEUM RD 0 1 20 35 435 10 0 10 0 0 15 35 96751 THRALL RD 4.69 5.68 26 50 630 10 0 5 5 0 15 35 94001 VANTAGE HWY 6.56 7.56 28 50 1448 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 25850 HORVATT RD 0 0.46 18 35 123 5 10 10 10 0 0 35 31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 2.84 3.25 20 50 753 10 0 10 0 0 15 35 96951 KITTITAS HWY 4.87 5.3 28 50 2863 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 42000 NANEUM RD 5.13 7,33 22 50 252 10 5 10 10 0 0 35 69760 PFENNING RD 0.97 1.08 20 35 871 10 0 10 0 0 15 35 15740 RAILROAD ST 0 0.71 32 35 803 10 0 0 10 0 15 35 40315 SANDERS RD 1.03 1.13 20 35 1216 10 0 10 0 0 15 35 13530 SPARKS RD 0 0.41 28 35 1634 10 0 5 5 0 15 35 28500 TEANAWAY RD 0 0.02 24 50 564 5 20 5 5 0 0 35 64756 UPPER BADGER POCKET RD 0 1,27 26 50 507 10 5 0 20 0 0 35 94001 VANTAGE HWY 7.56 9.6 26 50 852 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 28 29 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION c 0 �N � C �° c°1 N � w 3 i U 3 7 �p y c R N U 2 ,s. u �i :5 a O 3 `o m E 10 d 5 O C x ii $ - � C 3 •� 2 ie z E ,a N N M cc N 1I C4 Ln O O r2 A FL N 01 01 d N p cc wm [u d C. r r ++ a+ a+ N r 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 2.55 4.09 24 50 513 10 0 5 5 0 15 35 35285 ROBBINS RD 0 2.07 22 50 182 10 5 5 10 0 0 30 68515 CARROLL RD 0 1.53 20 50 176 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 96865 TJOSSEM RD 3.12 5,65 28 50 840 10 0 5 0 _ 0 15 30 68910 BADGER POCKET RD 3.35 4.39 18 50 287 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 41271 BRICK MILL RD 0.97 2.42 20 50 546 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 95630 BRONDT RD 0 0.62 20 50 221 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 95611 BROWN RD 0 1.16 20 35 726 10 10 5 5 0 0 30 67014 FOURTH PARALLEL RD 2.75 4.65 20 50 266 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 94326 NO. 81 RD 2,54 4.07 28 50 538 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 66912 SORENSON RD 2.55 4.1 22 50 293 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0 0.34 28 50 4063 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 4.09 4.57 26 50 513 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 94026 AIRPORT RD 1 1.26 36 35 895 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 93075 BENDER RD 0.59 0.68 20 35 1959 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 63500 FAIRVIEW RD 1.94 3.5 28 50 591 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 94051 GAME FARM RD 0.67 1.04 24 35 982 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 96951 KITTITAS HWY 1.03 1.34 28 35 3826 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 96951 KITTITAS HWY 5.38 5.49 28 35 655 10 0 20 0 0 0 30 95301 MANASTASH RD 1.36 3.35 24 50 1526 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 42000 NANEUM RD 7.33 8.94 24 50 252 10 5 5 10 0 0 30 96200 NO. 6 RD 1.02 1.85 26 50 1916 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 96200 NO. 6 RD 2.22 2.61 26 50 787 10 5 0 0 0 15 30 93526 REECER CREEK RD 0.76 1.26 38 50 1176 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 0.96 1.2 20 50 769 1 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 5.65 6.42 22 35 1145 10 d 10 10 0 0 30 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0.34 0.43 24 50 2373 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 93041 UNIVERSITY WAY 1.47 1.54 40 40 9101 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 93041 UNIVERSITY WAY 1.54 1.94 40 40 3648 10 d 0 20 0 0 30 94001 VANTAGE 2.03 2.53 28 50 7311 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 94001 VANTAGE HWY 1.28 1.53 32 35 7376 10 0 0 5 0 15 30 94001 VANTAGE HWY 16.6 18.5 38 50 528 10 0 0 5 0 15 30 94001 VANTAGE HWY 23.4 27.5 26 50 586 10 5 5 10 0 0 30 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 5.33 6.66 24 50 580 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 7.4 8.94 24 50 177 10 0 10 10 0 0 30 93075 BENDER RD 0 0.59 24 1 35 1245 10 10 5 0 0 0 25 41271 BRICK MILL RD 0.09 0.97 22 50 485 10 10 5 0 0 0 25 93025 DRY CREEK RD 2.32 2.42 24 35 258 10 5 5 5 0 0 25 94051 GAME FARM RD 0 0.28 24 35 991 10 5 1 10 0 0 0 25 29 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION d m m F. 0 1.55 18 c 220 10 0 0.98 0 50 699 C 0.75 M u 38 50 ,° 10 ?' 3.35 c 50 229 10 5.13 6.19 u 50 341 1p .a d c A N 767 � {ya ? o 50 4407 10 2.64 3.36 m d o 10 1.44 O C LL 545 LL D •� iR Z d E -- E '8 'i N M oOC u Lh N 1p 63245 PAYNE RD I 96865 TJOSSEM RD 96937 UMPTANUM RD 68910 BADGER POCKET RD 41271 BRICK MILL RD 31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 96951 KITTITAS HWY 96951 KITTITAS HWY 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 42000 NANEUM RD 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 96751 THRALL RD 96751 THRALL RD 25480 WEST FORK TEANAWAY RD 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 40772 LYONS RD 60640 ANDERSON RD 793025 DRY CREEK RD 34383 LOWER GREEN CANYON RD 62502 MOE RD 94001 VANTAGE HWY 94001 VANTAGE HWY 60640 ANDERSON RD 95501 COVE RD 93025 DRY CREEK RD 95600 HANSON RD 96951 KITTITAS HWY 95301 YANASTASH RD 94326 NO. 81 RD 21560 SALMON LA SAC RD 96937 UMPTANUM RD 96937 UMPTANUM RD 24610 UPPER PEOH POINT RD 54150 WEAVER RD 13550 WEST SPARKS RD 94126 WILSON CREEK RD E93047 OLD HIGHWAY TEN 69370 PARKE CREEK RD a d m m F. 0 1.55 18 50 220 10 0 0.98 28 50 699 10 0.75 1.07 38 50 3363 10 1.3 3.35 20 50 229 10 5.13 6.19 20 50 341 10 3.25 4.27 26 50 767 10 2.36 2.64 28 50 4407 10 2.64 3.36 28 50 4407 10 1.44 2.9 22 35 545 10 1 1.52 22 50 379 10 5.48 5.54 28 35 1145 10 1.1 2.18 26 50 1094 10 5.68 6.23 20 50 180 10 0.68 1.14 18 50 185 10 4.57 4.87 26 50 277 10 6.66 7.4 24 50 303 10 4 6.3 26 50 276 10 0.32 0.38 32 35 2976 10 1.78 2.32 36 35 258 10 0.28 3.88 22 50 247 10 0 1.63 20 50 314 10 9.6 10.7 26 50 823 10 10.7 11.2 28 50 823 10 0 0.32 32 35 2417 1 10 3.14 3.72 24 50 36210 0.99 1.15 28 35 639 10 1.96 3.07 28 50 580 10 5.3 5.38 28 35 2863 10 0 0.74 28 50 1737 10 0.53 1 24 35 1762 10 0 1.12 30 35 1260 10 0.24 0.5 32 35 4991 10 1.69 2.68 26 50 814 10 3.66 5.32 28 35 687 10 0 2.18 20 50 317 10 0 0.85 28 35 398 10 0 0.5 1 22 35 1601 10 0.42 1.09 28 50 2225 10 0.28 0.81 1 28 50 374 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0] 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 75- 25 25 25 25 25 25 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 75- 20 20 20 20 20 70- 20 20 2a 20 20 20 20 15 15 31 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION c 0 w c N u c N d 3 u R d C m w w C3 y y u u 2 o .ccp u Ra v01i _ R 3 w0 m O E +• y E 'M y O m c x iY o OC +° c 3 L L 7L m Z E N Nm �i Ln ~ to O O 6 6 C W A mmy N m C d" m a a�.r - ate+ - - ate+ _ N +fir - G 96937 UMPTANUM RD 0.5 0.69 40 35 5306 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 0.63 1.01 24 35 1429 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 41271 BRICK MILL RD 4.87 5.13 22 50 297 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96076 CANYON RD 2.17 2.92 40 50 3877 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 63500 FAIRVIEW RD 7.42 8.07 22 50 375 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 40761 LOOK RD 0 0.59 28 50 1590 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 42000 NANEUM RD 1.99 2.54 24 50 334 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96200 NO. 6 RD 0.36 0.68 24 50 2314 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96200 NO. 6 RD 0.86 1.02 24 50 1916 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96200 NO.6 RD 2.61 3.05 26 50 865 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 93526 REECER CREEK RD 1.26 2.26 34 50 1807 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 5.54 5.65 28 50 1148 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96751 THRALL RD 6.23 7.25 20 50 180 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96865 TJOSSEM RD 1.39 1.66 28 50 764 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 96937 UMPTANUM RD 0.69 0.75 38 35 3363 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 96937 UMPTANUM RD 1.07 1.19 34 50 2428 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 94001 VANTAGE 1.53 1.65 28 35 5672 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 94001 VANTAGE 1.65 2.03 28 50 5672 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 65002 PRATER RD 0 1.42 22 50 212 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 1.66 1.74 24 50 687 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 96751 THRALLRD 3.14 4.17 26 50 542 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 41010 BOWERS RD 1 1.51 36 35 225 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 29510 MIDDLE FORK TEANAWAY RD 0 0.02 20 50 112 5 0 5 0 0 0 10 42000 NANEUM RD 1.52 1.99 24 50 334 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 96200 NO. 6 RD 0.26 0.36 24 50 2314 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 96200 NO.6 RD 0.68 0.86 24 50 2057 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 94326 NO. 81 RD 1 2.54 24 50 840 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 15740 RAILROAD ST 1.36 1.81 28 35 305 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 93526 REECER CREEK RD 0 0.05 64 35 2612 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 93526 REECER CREEK RD 0.64 0.76 38 35 3093 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 1.551.66 24 50 1739 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 96751 THRALL RD 4.17 4.69 26 50 848 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 96937 UMPTANUM RD 1.19 1.69 34 50 2612 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 j� 94001 VANTAGE HWY 5.57 6.56 28 50 2699 1D 0 D 0 0 0 10 31 APPENDIX C Engineering Judgment Impacting Project Prioritization of Table 4 1. Priority One -Roadside Hazard Safety Improvements o Road segments were selected after each accident report was examined in great detail regarding fatalities, and injuries. Although a segment may have scored high due to accidents, the cause of the accident may not have been road related. This initiated the thought of steering away from corridor wide improvements which suggested mitigating roadway locations that meet current safety standards. Following this, County wide spot safety improvements were identified along these roadway segments to improve locations that would benefit most from safety countermeasures. All segments that were identified as needing guardrail, signs and/or delineation were then grouped together in this project regardless of total score for contracting efficiency. 2. Priority Two -Bride Rail -Code 3 o Bridges and/or structures with no rail or timber rail were classified as Code 3. Phases are identified by maintenance districts. Some districts had less bridge rail to update and were then grouped with adjacent maintenance districts. 3. Priority Three -Clear Zone Inventory o Data collected and analyzed will allow for more efficient project identification in future safety plans. 4. Priority Four -Denmark Rd o The first segment of Denmark Rd MP 0.5 to MP 3.08 scores below a 60 based on our scoring criteria. However this segment does have 4 bridges/structures that have deficient rail, this influenced our decision to include it in the safety plan, and group it with the segment scoring 95 from MP 3.08 to MP 4.35. The segment scoring 95 has a curve that needs safety improvements and contains accident history. By doing this we facilitate a project that would provide safety countermeasure to the entire Denmark Rd corridor. 5. Priority five-Huntzineer Rd o Phases identified by milepost instead of total score because all phases are priority 5. Milepost conscious phases allow the county to continue heading south along the corridor following the completion of our safety improvement project in 2017. 6. Priority Six -Bridge Rail -Code 2 o Bridges and/or structures with no approaches or non-crashworthy railing were classified as Code 2. Phases are identified by maintenance districts. Some districts had less bridge rail to update and were then grouped with adjacent maintenance districts. 7. Priority Seven-Bridee Rail -Code 1 o Bridges and/or structures with rail that does not meet current standards were classified as Code 1. Following the phase identification process as Priority Two and Priority Six, phases are by maintenance district to create more manageable projects. 8. Priority Eight -Corridor and Intersection Safety Improvements o Vantage Hwy has a segment with a High score of 165, when accident reports were analyzed it was identified that accidents were occurring due to motorists failing to yield to oncoming traffic, exceeding safe speeds and/or weather conditions. The location of these accidents did not indicate a safety issue with the roadway itself, nor did they suggest that safety countermeasures should be deployed. This resulted in the decision to place it as a lower priority. No. 6 Rd although containing a score of 50 which is below our stated cutoff of 60 was Included due to the accidents associated with Vantage highway in the vicinity of said intersection. Kittitas Highway was moved down in priority due to safety improvements recently constructed throughout the corridor. Monitoring of this corridor will continue to track the success of the recently constructed counter measures. 32 LEASE THIS LEASE is made and entered effective the V day of .lune, 2016, by and between Kittitas County Public Works, hereinafter referred to as the LESSOR, and Kittitas County Sheriff's Office, hereinafter referred to as the LESSEE. WITNESSETH: The Lessor hereby agrees to lease to the Lessee, and the Lessee hereby agrees to lease from the Lessor, the following described real property: Lot 2 of the Boat Ramp Short Plat, Kittitas County, Washington, further described as follows: Lot 2 consists of a total of 7,201 square feet with 2,597 square feet of the lot identified as non -buildable as it falls within the 60 foot easement for access to the public parking area for a total net buildable land area totaling 4604 square feet. This lease is made in pursuant to the authority of Chapter 2.81 KCC. TERM: The term of this lease shall be for thirty-five (35) years and will commence on the 1' day of June, 2016 and terminate on the 31st day of May, 2051, except as provided hereunder. (a) Lessee and Lessor agree that the parties may modify the terms of this lease, in whole or in part, including but not limited to modifying the area of land covered by this lease, the rental due, the term of duration of this lease and/or any other term of condition of this lease, but only upon such terms as are mutually agreed upon in writing.. (b) In the event that Lessor finds it necessary to terminate this lease for reasons not reasonably anticipated at the time of entering into the lease, Lessor shall do so only upon one hundred twenty (120) days written notice, notifying Lessee at Lessee's address of record, that the lease to which this applied is being terminated. Lessee's sole basis for termination of the lease shall be a permanent change in the water level or course of the Columbia River that makes the described property not reasonably useable for the Lessee's purpose in entering this lease, Lessee's boating operations on the Columbia River. (c) In the event that the lease is terminated, all rents shall be pro -rated to the date Lessee shall have restored the premises to the Lessor in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement governing Lessee's duties to restore the premises to Lessor upon expiration of the lease term. (d) It is further agreed that any modification or termination of this lease pursuant to the terms of the lease shall not give rise to any cause of action for damages or any other form of relief by Lessee against Lessor or any successor lessee. (e) In the event of such termination, Lessee understands that other than a refund of any unearned rent prorated to the date Lessee has restored the premises to Lessor, Lessee shall have no claim for compensation as occasioned by said modification or termination. 2. RENT: Rent shall be paid in advance on an annual basis, with the first payment due on or before the 1 st day of June of each year and continuing thereafter until termination of this lease. The rental rate for each year is as follows: Prosecutor reviewed 04/11/2017 MEMN :Nsbl.ill,ll 3. ADJUSTMENT OF RENTAL: The rental for every five year period thereafter, or part thereof, at the commencement of such period, shall be readjusted and fixed by the Board of County Commissioners; (a) After each five year period of this lease, the Lessor shall have the right to readjust the rent on or before February 1" of the fifth year of this lease for the subsequent five year period; and the increase shall BE THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF THE CPI INDEX OVER THE PREVIOUS FIVE YEARS. The first five year period shall be run from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020, and each five year period used for the purposes of calculating the increase in rent shall be set in the same manner thereafter for the remainder of the period of the lease. The rent increase is at the sole discretion of the Lessor, and Lessor may elect to maintain the rent at the previous rate. It is agreed between LESSOR and LESSEE that the following CPI Index will be used for future rental increases: "CPI — All Cities -All Items Size Class D Under 50,000." 4. UTILITIES: The Lessee shall pay for extension of and all utility services supplied to the premises. Any such extensions shall be subject to the advance review of the Lessor. 5. PURPOSE: The Lessee shall utilize the premises primarily for Sheriff's Office purposes. 6. IMPROVEMENTS: Upon termination of this lease, for whatever reason and under whatever circumstances, all improvements remaining upon the leased premises become the property of Lessor, free and clear, without any liability of Lessor to Lessee. Should Lessor desire the removal of Lessee's improvements upon the date of lease termination, Lessor shall give Lessee written notice to remove all improvements and return the premises to its state as before the lease at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination date for the lease. Upon removal, the premises shall be left in a neat and orderly condition, without debris and shall be graded level. Should the premises not be left in such condition, after Lessee received such notice, Lessor may remove improvements and repair the premises and seek reimbursement from Lessee in any manner allowed by law. In the event the Lessee exercises the option to remove building and improvements or is otherwise directed to remove said building and improvements, the work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the termination of the lease_ The Lessee shall provide the Lessor notice in writing at least 30 days prior to the termination of this lease of Lessee's intent for such removal. In the event notice is not given, or the Lessee fails to complete such removal within the prescribed time limits, the building and other improvements shall become the property of the Lessor and any removal costs shall be assessed the Lessee. PAGE 2 Rental Rate (Ground Lease) Term (4,604 Sq. Ft at $.09 per Sq. Ft) 06/01/16 — 05/31/21 ! $414.36 06/01/21 Recalculate as described below 3. ADJUSTMENT OF RENTAL: The rental for every five year period thereafter, or part thereof, at the commencement of such period, shall be readjusted and fixed by the Board of County Commissioners; (a) After each five year period of this lease, the Lessor shall have the right to readjust the rent on or before February 1" of the fifth year of this lease for the subsequent five year period; and the increase shall BE THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF THE CPI INDEX OVER THE PREVIOUS FIVE YEARS. The first five year period shall be run from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020, and each five year period used for the purposes of calculating the increase in rent shall be set in the same manner thereafter for the remainder of the period of the lease. The rent increase is at the sole discretion of the Lessor, and Lessor may elect to maintain the rent at the previous rate. It is agreed between LESSOR and LESSEE that the following CPI Index will be used for future rental increases: "CPI — All Cities -All Items Size Class D Under 50,000." 4. UTILITIES: The Lessee shall pay for extension of and all utility services supplied to the premises. Any such extensions shall be subject to the advance review of the Lessor. 5. PURPOSE: The Lessee shall utilize the premises primarily for Sheriff's Office purposes. 6. IMPROVEMENTS: Upon termination of this lease, for whatever reason and under whatever circumstances, all improvements remaining upon the leased premises become the property of Lessor, free and clear, without any liability of Lessor to Lessee. Should Lessor desire the removal of Lessee's improvements upon the date of lease termination, Lessor shall give Lessee written notice to remove all improvements and return the premises to its state as before the lease at least thirty (30) days prior to the termination date for the lease. Upon removal, the premises shall be left in a neat and orderly condition, without debris and shall be graded level. Should the premises not be left in such condition, after Lessee received such notice, Lessor may remove improvements and repair the premises and seek reimbursement from Lessee in any manner allowed by law. In the event the Lessee exercises the option to remove building and improvements or is otherwise directed to remove said building and improvements, the work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the termination of the lease_ The Lessee shall provide the Lessor notice in writing at least 30 days prior to the termination of this lease of Lessee's intent for such removal. In the event notice is not given, or the Lessee fails to complete such removal within the prescribed time limits, the building and other improvements shall become the property of the Lessor and any removal costs shall be assessed the Lessee. PAGE 2 KITfITAS COUNTY 7. REPAIltS: The maintenance and repair of the structure and other improvements shall be the responsibility of the Lessee, including utilities within the leased area. (a) The Lessee further agrees that it will not commit waste and that it will keep said prernises in a safe, sanitary, neat, presentable, and otherwise good condition, and in general shall comply with all the applicable governmental rules, ordinances and regulations as may be required or imposed by such authorities on said premises and shall comply with any direction pursuant to law of any public officer or officers who shall be empowered to enforce local, state and federal rules, regulations and ordinances upon the Lessee with respect to the said premises or the use, occupancy, or control thereof and shall not suffer any improper or offensive use of said premises. 8. AREA MAINTENANCE: Lessee shall, during the term of this lease, maintain the area between the building and boundary line of said lease to the satisfaction of the Lessor. The area shall be kept free of all debris, weeds and brush for the term of this lease. Lessee shall reimburse the Kittitas County Weed Authority or Kittitas County Department of Public Works for any costs incurred in the event that the County Weed Authority or Kittitas County Department of Public Works undertakes noxious weed or vegetation control measures. 9. NOTICES: Any notice given by one party to the other in connection with this agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested as follows: (a) If to Lessor, addressed to: Kittitas County Department of Public Works 411 N. Ruby, Suite #1 Ellensburg, Washington 98926 (b) If to Lessee, addressed to: Kittitas County Sheriff's Office 307 W. Umptanum Ellensburg, WA 98926 Notice shall be deemed to have been received on the date of receipt as shown on the return receipt. 10. ASSIGNMENT: The Lessee shall not assign this lease nor sublet any portion thereof without fust obtaining the written consent of the Lessor. 11. HOLD HARMLESS: The Lessee hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Lessor from any and all claims or demands whatsoever arising out of any loss, damage, or injury to persons or property resulting from the Lessee's use or occupancy of said premises and leased area, or caused by the acts or neglect of the Lessee, his agents or employees. 12. DEFAULT: In the event the Lessee shall fail to comply with any of Lessee's commitments, duties or responsibilities under this lease, or any of its conditions or terms as herein stated, the Lessor may terminate this lease by giving thirty (30) days written notice of the conditions or terms being violated. If said failures are not corrected within the thirty (30) day period, this lease may be terminated and the PAGE 3 KITfITAS COUNTY Lessor shall be entitled to peaceably retake possession of the premises, provided the Lessee shall have the right to remove improvements as herein provided. In addition to the provisions hereinabove, and/or as an alternative or cumulative remedy, Lessor may, at its sole election, pursue any other action, redress, or remedy now or hereafter available to Lessor under the laws of the State of Washington, including its Landlord -Tenant laws. 13. WAIVER: No assent, express or implied, by the Lessor to any breach of any of Lessee's covenants, agreements, conditions or terms hereof shall be deemed or taken to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of any covenant, agreement, condition or term hereof. 14. APPLICABILITY: The covenants, agreements, terms and conditions contained in this lease shall apply to and be binding upon Lessor and Lessee and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successor and assigns. 15. INTEGRATION: Exhibits and Recitals are incorporated herein by this reference. This Lease embodies the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein contained. No amendments or modifications hereof shall be enforceable unless in writing, signed by the party to be charged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lessor and Lessee have signed their names and affixed their seals the day and year first above written. Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik Board- Mandy Buchholz rrrrrrr i n i n; m�+ti`'� LESSOR: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITT11QS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Chairman Obie O'Brien, Commissioner LESSEE: .4 Address: Kittitas County Sheriffs Office 307 W. Umptanum Ellensburg, WA 98925 PAGE 4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO.oulTOU TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE 2017 ANNUAL PAINT STRIPE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAME WHEREAS: The Department of Public Works solicited bids for the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program in accordance with RCW 39.04.155 Small Works Roster Contract Procedures; and WHEREAS: Sealed bids were opened on May 12, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in the Kittitas County Permit Center, Department of Public Works, 411 N. Ruby Street, Suite 1, Ellensburg, Washington; and WHEREAS: Two (2) bids were received for the prescribed work. The Director of Public Works recommends the lowest responsive bid from Stripe Rite Inc., of $233,936.10 be accepted. NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby award the contract for the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program in the amount of $233,936.10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director for the Department of Public Works is authorized to sign the contract documents for said project. DATED on this 22nd day of May, 2017, at Ellensburg, Washington. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KI�A-9,COUNTY, P Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik ice -Chairman f "p0lP1Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz 00 V ��� Obie O'Brien, Commissioner - �Z d Z M- S H IN����.���`: m O O O r N L i D u_ 3 Q .a C1 Ln GJ Q. O .D m a O z `a cc H LA J a z z a LA Y cc O V J m a r z O u cn a F- H H n H O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln O Ln 0 0 0 Ln Ln O b 0 00 0 O N za 00 l6 Ol M N O N n co O 00 44 OD m a+ N N M N n Ln N d 00 0 LD LD N N S m 0 Ln LD M LD - .-s Ln 00 00 Lo m C U M N Ol f6 r1 N N � O C H J ih U1 V} a C. 0 4 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 O Q 0 0 Q oa00 0 0000 00 00 U Ln O Ln O Ln O 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 Vi. t4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 O o 0 a LPL 01 O 00 N N N Ln O Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri n LD n 00 0 Ln m O] N cn 00 O 00 V V O0 lD LD :n0 O n M LD V .--1 O LD LD N N C M QW N M LD Ln 00 M m 00 M m d r-1 Ln 00 00 LD Ql U Ln N a--!' N N Ti m (V m 00 O r�-I` M Ol � N N +. o G! Q D in u� tri v> u� to cn v► tr> vti sn iA vF an of v� yn 0 0 cc 0 0 co 0 0 1 O O 0 0 0 4 O O O O O Lm O cc O O Cl 0 O O H 0 0 U N �--? O1 CV O M fV M w "I 0) P'] cn M w M 4 d O. d; O a O V C 7= I .n sn i^- ull Vn to an in cry in V> u} O Ln Ln 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p N O 00 W n LD 00 Ln O O7 14: O KI' N N d R 00 -1 pl 4 m .4 O O -1 N 00 00 L0 Ln Ln O 01 W +-' o r -I m V o 00 W d00 C C O Ln d n e-1 n ,--1 LD M m n +-� Q n d rl 0) ry LD ++ w LD 00 LD W M n p m GV m r, w N U •-1 �--I N l U rl Lp fV O1 -4v-i C IC N 10 m m N W W 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 O O O O Z s, 0 0 0 0 - O O o 0 O O 0 0 N O O M Ln O Sn .--I 4 d m O 0 00 0 H 0 .--1 0 00 O C. N 0 (v ON 0 0 N Z U r-1 m m m U m V' V` u d� W _ a aU-� 1= C C C O O O 41V V). V� Lu u Lr) w w w I u M lu yq CL Z Z a z Z z z{{ Z Z M a w a Q Sf ° N LL, z z LU Z Z (D ' z _ cccc Zho - w N} 00 C �C W Z F" C cc ll�Lnnn g- Fy C V � H Ln Q F 0� ` LL J OLS Y � OZI == 0a M Z O U w m Z O w Ln m O L`L m o w u Z d 0 U? O F 2 z 0 Z Lo C w C W= C w 9- w E L3- Y a E Y o C o o mC o o CU _ O H O m Ln ON V C > J O ) O E aw m J O Ln O M a = -- a a _ a O� 0 w OJ O w 0 W g 0 w _�' S^ F �_ w 1= J Z J W J= r} r L y W > LA D � in H Q W � O a O LU -L LL 0 U- 0z LU 2 N co w 00 Ln O Ln O1 w N Ln 0! 0 m 3 LD LD Ow O y 2 ? '' S O T O O 2 O -4-4 tD D1 Ln LUi7 (.i 'y' O � V m N �, Ln N N LUn m O r1 -! LD =0= Dc w N 0 O U LL: W N M N W y,1 ! ui 6L a ¢ a a � O C # 0 LOL1 mm Eim S E Ln m n m 2 E m d m = U 1-15 m H Ln Ln KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY CONfMIISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: May 18, 2017 TOPIC: Public Works Gravel Road Grading Business Practices ACTION REQUESTED: Informational LEAD STAFF. Mark R. Cook RECOMMENDATION: None are being sought at this time. BREWING SUMMARY: Public Works (PW) conducts two distinct grading practices: with base stabilization and without stabilization. Tb= are approximately 63 miles of gravel roadway in the PW grading system. Gravel roads that are base stabilized • Approximately 20 miles of gravel roads are base stabilized • Sprung grading includes the application of approximately 3,500 gallon of magnesium chloride per mile With roller compaction • A second round of grading occurs in fall for roads with average daily traffic greater than 70 cars per day • Spring timing is driven by roadway moisture and the ability of the road to support construction equipment. Ambient air moisture is also a consideration when applying magnesium chloride to limit the potential of "splashing" onto vehicles during a three day cure period. Gravel roads that are not base stabilized • Spring grade and roller compaction • Spot gravel application in areas not supporting the establishment of road crown minimum 2% from roadway centerline • Every seven (7) years, the road is re -rocked with approximately two (2) inches of crushed surfacing top course. • No dust control is provided. • Spring timing is driven by roadway moisture and the ability of the road to support construction equipment BACKGROUND: For the past several years, PW has been applying magnesium chloride to various county roads as a means of burdening gravel roadbed. The chloride significantly reduces Page 1 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT potholes and eliminates dust emission. Approximately 20 miles of county gravel roadway axe currently base stabilized annually. DISCUSSIO;hr: The practice of base stabilization is cost effective, provides and improved running surface for roadway users and significantly eliminates dust emission. PW desires expanding the use of base stabilization of its remaining gravel roads during the 2018 construction season. FISCAL IMPACTS: Currently, PW is spending approximately $5,500 per mile to base stabilize its gravel roadways. The practice significantly reduces grading costs by eliminating a second round of grading in most circumstances. PW is developing a program that will base stabilize all remaining gravel roads by the end of 2019. The remaining 43 miles of un - stabilized gravel is estimated at costing approximately $240,000. Over the next several months, PW will perform a cost/benefit analysis and report back to the Board during our 2018 budget presentation. ATTACBMENTS: Exhibit 1: Gravel Road List Page 2 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 1: CURRENT GRAVEL ROAD LIST Page 3 of 3 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMNUSSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT RDS E RQAD MANE BNP I EMP LENGTH 9URF ND 0 6 0.096 ORV 22811 FM DAIRY 612 0.861 OA30 DRV 22811 DAIRY RD 1.521 6.746 LNi1f 23M HU RD 0.62 1.67 0.760 {/ B 28061 E ER RD 0 0.7 GRV B 272 RD 0 1.84 1.940 DRY B 28500 RD 0 686 0.�0 DRV 8 18060 H03DEN V 7.02 188 0.8mGRV 9 280D0 HIDDEN VALLEY RD 188 297 D 480 CRV 20281 FLEY RD 0.7 0700 GRV B 20261 LEYRD 0.7 132 Od20 GRV B Z3531 WCHEL Er 0 RO 0 094 Q tdRi/ B XMISKJOK-PRIUMERD 0.1 095 DRV B MMI PRHI RD m 1.18 .780 B A-8=19VVALJK PRNRIE RD .19 1 O.ApO DRV B 27240 TAYLOR RD 0 0.88 0.880 GRV 8 27 0 E✓i1M10 FR 0.78 137 0 DO GRV C 2H25p PA8C5D RD 0 1.18 1.160 >3 G 1 7 8 7. Q07p DRV C 25907 A LANE D 88 OAW GRV b 26600 MWiK RD 03 0. 0.980 GRV b 5433D2N0 BT 0.12 091 0.180 GRV E 68EJ60 � O.OS D.036 66781 Dl1RR 0 186 E 1.47 E 881 DE RD 1.89 4 6310 E 88186 4 466 0.41 E 1p TRD D 088 0.880 E 9889summ 53Y 8. 3810 GRV E RD 0.48 0430 DRV E 92010pb �oenan 0 0.780 ORV F VIW .DWTA:OF UM U31 KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: May 22, 2017 TOPIC: Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017 by Resolution LEAD STAFF: Lucas Huck BREIFING SUMMARY: • A Road Safety Plan was adopted for Kittitas County in 2014 by Resolution Number 2014-106 • Public Works received a $54,000 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant to update the County Road Safety Plan • Public Works has completed a new County Road Safety Plan which prioritizes projects for safety improvements • Public Works seeks adoption of the new plan to allow HSIP ,grant application submittals for safety project funding prior to the May 31, 2017 deadline BACKGROUND: HSIP is a core Federal -Aid Program with the purpose to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. Washington State has adopted Target Zero — a goal to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on Washington's roadways to zero by the year 2030. WSDOT administers HSIP funding to local agencies, adopted safety plans allow local agencies to apply and receive finding for safety improvement projects. DISCUSSION: Many different strategies were used to generate the 2017 Safety Plan. Projects were identified and prioritized by using real data such as accident history, known roadside hazards within clear zone, and substandard geometric designs. Following the data collection, and ranking efforts the engineering staff took a different approach prioritizing and grouping proposed improvement projects. Rather than focusing on one road at a time, we are looking at high risk, big benefit, spot improvement projects that occur in various locations county wide, this is :reflected in our top two prioritized projects. Additionally there are nearly 200 Bridges County wide with deficient traffic safety rail; this is a high priority for Public Works to address. Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Eight safety improvement priorities where identified and are summarized as follows: 1. Roadside Hazard Safety Improvements — This is a County wide spot safety improvement project to fix known high risk hazard locations on multiple roadways. 2. Bridge Rail Code 3 (Phase 1 through Phase 3) — This is three separate construction projects to improve bridges that have no safety rail or wooden traffic rail. 3. Clear Zone Inventory — Data Collection — This is a planning effort to identify hazards County wide. 4. Denmark Road - Project to improve safety hazards on said road. S. Huntzinger Road (Phase 1 through Phase 3) — This is three separate construction projects to continue guardrail along Huntzinger Road. 6. Bridge Rail Code 2 (Phase 1 through Phase 7) — This is seven separate construction projects to improve bridges that have no approach rail, or non- crashworthy Tall. 7. Bridge Rail Code 1 - This improves bridges that have no approach rail. S. Corridor and Intersection Safety Improvements — Monitors several locations that have accidents but we have recently improved. So we will watch to see if the accidents are reduced and decide if these locations should be fiarther evaluated and improved or removed from future plans. FISCAL IMPACTS: The data gathering, engineering analysis, project scoping, cost estimating, and plan narrative is being delivered internally by the Public Works engineering staff. To date about $27,000 has been expensed. It is anticipated that the plan will be delivered approximately well under the budgeted $54,000 grant. ATTACbIIV=S: Final Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017 Page 2 of 2 PUBLIC WORKS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTXTAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2017 - TO ADOPT THE KITTITAS COUNTY ROAD SAFETY PLAN 2017 WHEREAS: Public Works received. a $54,000 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant in 2015 to update the adopted 2014 safety plan; and WHEREAS: In accordance with Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) 2017 Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) County Safety Program call for projects, the County Engineer has prepared a Kittitas County Road Safety Plata 2017; and WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2017 identifies prioritized locations for low cost, beneficial, county wide safety improvements based upon crash data, roadway investigations, engineering judgement, and risk based analysis as set forth in WSDOT's HSIP call for projects; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, sloes hereby adopt the Kitdtas County Road Safety Plan 2017, hereto attached, as now submitted by the Kittitas County Director of Public Works and County Engineer. DATED on this 22nd day of May, 2017, at Ellensburg,' Washington_ Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KITTTTAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Paul Jewell, Chairman Laura Osiadacz, Vice -Chairman ❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz Obie O'Brien, Commissioner Kittftas County Road Safety Plan 2017 May 22nd, 2017 Kittitas County Public Works Department 411 North Ruby Street, Suite 1 Ellensburg, WA 98926 Introduction The Kittitas County Road Safety Plan is a comprehensive program of safety improvements aimed at reducing fatalities and serious injury accidents across the entire county road system. This program of improvements was developed using a strategy similar to the Washington State Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2016: Target Zero, In which crash data is analyzed to identify accident trends and contributing factors, and then sites within the road system are prioritized based on a risk-based ranking system. Safety improvement projects are then developed to target spat location and systemic improvements that provide the greatest benefit to the traveling public by preventing potential fatal and serious Injury accidents. Due to the sporadic nature of crashes on rural county roads, it can be difficult to determine trends using past data alone to choose good locations for improvements. However, past crash data can be used to predict future crashes by evaluating the contributing factors and targeting improvements for roads with similar characteristics. This is why Kittitas County has decided to utilize this strategy to allow for a proactive approach that benefits more locations throughout the entire County road system and is more cost effective than just focusing an past crash locations. Data Analysis Data used for this evaluation was provided by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDaT). The data includes detailed information about crashes on Kittitas County roads from 2011 through 2015, including a comparison of how Kittkas County's roads compare to other public roads In the state, this is detailed In Table 1 below. Although overall, fatal and serious injury collisions occur at a similar rate to other public roads within the state, Kittitas County is committed to reducing these types of collisions and strives to collaboratively achieve the statewide goal of zero deaths and serious injuries on Washington's roadways by 2030. This Safety Plan focuses on Identifying cost efficient safety improvement projects that offer substantial safety benefits county wide, and reduces potential fatal and serious injury collisions along Kittitas County's roadway network. 2 TABLE 1 2011 through 2015 Collision Comparison ffivaus County All Counties-C.a. All Public Roads Maintained Roads Collision Type # % of # % of K of Crashes Crashes Crashes trashes # Gashes Crashes Fatal 5 19.2% 632 0.234 2,188 19.9% Serious Injuries 21 802% 2,067 0.766 8,813 80.1% Alcohol -Related 10 38.5% 838 0.31 2,684 24.4% Total # Fatalities 5 679 2,378 Total # All Injuries 224 32,265 230,395 Total #AlI Collisions 656 67,137 -- 523,186 — The 2011-2015 WSDOT provided collision data was further evaluated to determine the predominant crash types and contributing factors. As shown In Table 2 below, the predominant causes of fatal and serious Injury collisions In Klttitas County are "hitting a fixed object" and "overturning." Crashes involving fixed -object hazards, or non -traversable roadside slopes wlthin clear zone accounted for 53.8% of all fatal and serious injury collisions_ Additionally 26.9% of the fatal and serious injury collisions were caused by vehicles overturning. Unprotected roadside slopes steeper than 3H:1V are considered non - traversable and contribute to overtuming accidents. The predominate conditions where fatal and serious injury collisions occurred included higher speed roadways with less than desirable lighting conditions and where roadway curvature was a factor. This accident data seems consistent for a county like Kittitas where the majority of the roadway network is rural without lighting features. Accidents tend to be more severe when speeds are higher and where low light conditions hinder driver acuity, especially in horizontal curves where drivers are more likely to leave the roadway. Non - intersection related collisions accounted for 65-4% of the fatal and serious injury collisions, which Is also consistent with the amount of roadway lane miles versus intersections existing within the Kittitas County roadway network. For the fatal and serious injury collisions accident report details please see Appendix A. TABLE 2 2011 through 2015 Crash Data Fatal/Serlaus Injury Colliston Types and Conditions Kltthas County AN Counties - Co. All Publk Roads Collision Type MalntalnedRoads (Run-gjf the rwd) # % of # % of # % of Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes Crashes Hit Fixed Object - Roadway Ditch 3 21.40% 153 13.10% 307 9.70% Hit Fixed Object- Ran Over Embankment 3 21.40% 110 9.40% 273 &6096 Hit Fixed Object -Earth Bank 2 14.30% 108 9.30% 230 7.30% Hit Fixed Object- Fence 1 7.10% 102 SM% 199 6.30% Hit Fixed Object -Guardrail 1 7.10% 49 1.70% 237 7.50% Hit Fixed Object - Utility Pole 1 7.10% 136 4.50% 284 9.00% Hit Fixed Object -Tree 1 7.10% 281 10.30% 589 18.50% Hit Fixed Object- Luminaire Pale 1 7.10% 4 1.50% 580 1.60% Hit Faced Object -Drawbridge Crossing Arm Gate 1 7.1096 1 1.50% 1 0.00% Total Hit Fixed Object 241 53.90% 1,165 43.20% 3,159 28.70% Overturn 7 26.90% 311 11.50% 965 8.80% Light Condition - Dark, No Street Lights 5 19.20% 788 29.20% 1,791 16.30% Light Condition - Dusk 3 11.50% 96 3.60% 339 3.1096 Light Condition - Dark, Street Lights On 2 7.7 251 9.30% 2,370 21.5096 Light Condition - Dawn 1 3.8 48 1.W% 162 1.50% Total Light Condition 11 1 42.30% L187 45.70% 4,836 44.00% Non -Intersection -Not Related 17 65A0% 1,815 67.20% 5,963 54.20% Road Curvature - Horizontal Curve 13 50% 1,038 38.50% 2,868 26.10% Over Centerline 2 5.30%1 485 12.50% 1,215 8.30% Motorcycle 5 15.20% 570 15.40%1 2,215 13.20% Posted Speed at 50 mph 22 1 73.30% 878 25.8095 1 1,663 11.2096 Risk -Based Prioritization Methodology Run-off the road crashes have been identified as the predominant collision type in Kittitas County and are occurring at a disproportionately high rate as compared to other public roads in the state as shown in the crash data provided by WSDOT for 2011-2015 that Is reflected In 'Cable 2. Because of that, this plan will focus on roadside safety improvements to reduce the severity and number of accidents on Kiittitas County roads where it is most likely that run-off the road crashes will occur. From a safety perspective, the ideal roadway is straight with roadsides that are flat and unobstructed by hazards. Straight roadways eliminate the need for drivers to navigate curves, reducing the chances of 4 running off the road. Providing the recommended clear zone and roadside slopes allow drivers to safely recover control of a vehicle in the event they do leave the roadway and helps ensure fixed -object hazards do not cause fatal or serious injury accidents. The aforementioned roadway geometry and clear recovery area is the goal In improving roadside safety but Is often cost prohibitive due to the geography of the area and is not supported by rural character or practical design. In cases where It Is cost prohibitive to eliminate roadway curvature and create an unobstructed traversable roadside, alternative improvements that may reduce the severity of an accident or alert a driverto a hazard should be considered. This safety plan focuses on roadway segments where low cost high benefit improvements can be implemented. These Improvements include breakaway features on posts, guardrail deployment, bridge rail retrofits, rumble strip Installation, and signing and traffic delineation upgrades, all of which can be implemented to reduce fatal and serious injury collisions. Based on the crash data for 2011-2015, 90 percent of the total crashes involved roads with an ADT of 175 or more and with a speed limit of 35mph of higher. In order to have the greatest potential impact in reducing collisions, the County considered roads for evaluation and priorltization for safety improvements with the following characteristics: MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR INCWDING ROAD SEGMENT IN SAFETY PLAN: • Paved (ACP, HMA, or BST) • ADT of 175 or mare. Posted speeds of 35 or more. • Collision at this site In the past 5 years. The minimum criteria include the preliminary eligibility requirements for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)as stated underthe 2017 County Safety Program: Call for Projects. County road segments with the characteristics listed above and road segments that were on the previous safety plan were evaluated and scored as shown in Table 3. The resulting road segment prioritization is shown in Appendix B. TABLE 3 Scoring Criteria and Weighted Scores item Number Factors and CoayJalae Types scare 1 OVERALL CRITERIA MET. Meets minimum arteria and was included In previous hazard elimination plan 20 Meets minimum criteria but not Included In previous hazard elimination plan 10 noes not meet minimum criteria and was Included In previous hazard slim. pian 5 2 Inadequate clear zone with steep embankment or ditches (no guardrail) Over 50% of the side slopes are too steep 20 About 10% to 50% of side slopes too steep 10 At least one section has side slopes too steep 5 3 Fixed objects In clear zone (fence, utility poles, tree, mall box, etc.) Over 50% of the road has fixed objects in clear zone 20 About 10% to 50% of the road has fixed objects in clear zone 10 At least one section of the road has fixed objects In dear zone 5 4 Roadway Curvature — Horizontal Curve Over 50% of the road is in a horizontal curve Z0 About 10% to 50% of the road 1s In a horizontal curve 10 At least one section of the road is in a horizontal curve 5 5 ONE OR MORE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURY COLLISION(S) — 2011 THROUGH 2015 Fatality 50 ea. Serious Injury 40 ea 6 INJURY 15 ea. Development of Road Segment Safety Improvements After roadway segments were prioritized using the risk-based scoring as described above, the results were reviewed and the list was shortened so the plan could focus on the segments that would see the most benefit from safety improvements and eliminated erroneous results or locations reflecting outdated information. Road segments with a score of So or lower were removed from consideration. Road segments that were within the scope of current improvement projects or recently completed improvement projects were also removed. Each accident report was examined for further details regarding the incident to further identify contributing factors, driver actions, alcohol or drug Influence, Intersection related, and any countermeasures already in place. The list of candidate locations was further reduced by eliminating roadway segments where accidents were alcohol or drug related with no hazard at the site and segments where countermeasures were already In place and or where no countermeasures would have prevented the accident. The remaining roadway segments were then evaluated for potential safety improvements. Safety Improvements that emerged from this evaluation included guardrail installation, signing, and additional delineation at spot locations to prevent run off the road accidents, and various intersection Improvement projects. Additionally the County has Identified a need to address copious amounts of inadequate bridge railing. There are a total of 268 bridge structures within Kittitas County, many of which have insufficient railing or no railing at all, Because these observed hazards have a high potential for serious injury or fatal accidents, Kittitas County has chosen to be proactive and include these locations in this safety plan to prevent predicted future crashes. This preventative, systemic, risk-based approach Is supported using the FHWA Systematic Safety Project Selection Tool criteria, which states that a site can be Identified as a candidate for safety investment if It has multiple riskfactors but no crash history. Finally Kittitas County recognized a need to collect data to support a clear zone Inventory for the entire county road system. The effort to identify hazards within clear zone for the purposes of creating this safety plan included utilization of a variety of tools, Including Mobility, Google Earth, RoadVlewer, and field visits. Future safety improvement projects could be better identified using a more thorough dear zone inventory targeting known hazard locations. For this reason a planning project has been identified as part of this safety plan to collect clear zone inventory data, which will create a roadside hazard database, and identify potential countermeasures. Prioritized Cost Effective Safety Improvement Projects Road segment safety improvement identification used combination of spot location and systematic approaches. After Improvements were identified, they were priorltlzed based on the potential for crash prevention and greatest benefit, as supported by engineering judgement. Kitthas County evaluated the scoring, and road segment safety Improvement resu Its to find high risk, sizable benefit countermeasures to group together as County wide safety projects that promptly provide the biggest benefit for the most efficient cost. By focusing on similarities In the roads and their needs, safety improvement projects were formed rather than road focused projects, allowing the county to better reduce the possibility of fatalities and/or serious injuries. Locations with similar geographic vicinity, or projects with similarly proposed Improvements were grouped together to provide efficient contracting and cost effectiveness. A summary of the Safety Improvement Projects can be found in Table 4, followed by the details for each project including preliminary scope and locations of the proposed work and an estimated cost for the improvements. a Table 4 Roadside Hazards 0asrZone Inventory HuntzingerRd Budge Rall -Code 1 Bridge gall -Code 3 Denmark Rd Bridge Rol I -Code 2 Corridar&Intersection Prioritized ft4ed use E X `o '" ` td 55550 THORP CEMETERY RD 0 3.02 24 50 289 10 0 5 10 0 75 100 1 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 29 5 05 20 35 300 10 10 10 0 0 30 60 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 577 ; 764 26 50 471 10 10 5 20 40 0 85 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 0 SSI 26 50 1$0 1 20 5 5 20 0 15 65 21560 SALMON LA SAC RD 175 10.59 30 1 35 578 10 5 5 20 40 45 125 22710 WE5T51DE RD 214 394 22 1 35 1454 10 10 10 1 10 0 30 70 26180 CA5A5SA RD 0 112 22 35 341 20 10 20 20 1 0 0 70 34383 LOWER GREEN CANYON RD 0 028 24 50 247 1U 5 0 5 0 45 65 93526 REELER CREEK RD 026 0 312 49 35 2500 10 0 5 20 40 15 90 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 487 533 26 50 730 10 0 5 5 0 45 65 41271 BRICK MILL RD 41 4.87 20 50 396 10 5 10 10 40 0 75 42000 NANEUM RD 254 411 20 50 372 10 0 10 5 40 :l5 80 93526 REECER CREEK RD 48 668 1 24 50 376 20 0 5 10 0 60 95 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 101 255 26 50 873 1 10 5 10 0 501 30 105 BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 3 -PRASE Z 2 BRIDGE RAIL: CODE 3-PHASE 2 BRIDGE BAIL -CODE 3-PHASE 3 CLEAR ZONE INVENTORY -DATA COLLECTION 3 6350:, DENMARK RD 308 435 20 1 50 912 20 10 5 20 401 0 95 4 63501 DENMARK RD 05 308 20 50 319 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 75040 HUNTZINGER RD -PHASE L 27 488 24 50 889 10 20 20 20 0 0 70 5 75040 HUN77INGER PX -PHASE 2 514 699 24 50 734 20 20 20 20 0 30 110 75040 HUNTZINGER RD -PHASE 3 699 1074 24 50 371 20 5 20 20 0 p 65 BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 2 -PHASE 1 I 8 BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 2 -PHASE 2 BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 2 -PHASE 3 I I BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 2 -PHASE 4 i BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 2 -PHASE 5 BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 2 -PHASE 6 1 I BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 2 -PHASE 7 I BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 1 -PHASE 1 ! BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 1 -PHASE 2 BRIDGE RAIL -CODE 1 -PHASE 3 ' 94001 VANTAGE HWY 213 2336 38 SD 586 10 5 0 20 40 15 90 8 94001 VANTAGE HWY 408 5.57 28 50 4930 10 0 0 0 80 75 165 94001 VANTAGE HWY 112 1656 26 SO 376 10 5 0 10 40 0 55 94001 VANTAGE HWY 277 4 08 28 50 5486 10 0 5 5 40 30 90 96951 KIiTTPAS HWY 152 236 28 50 1565 10 0 .5 060 75 962W NO 6 RD 0 0 26 24 50 2305 10 0 10 1 0 0 30 50 Roadside Hazards 0asrZone Inventory HuntzingerRd Budge Rall -Code 1 Bridge gall -Code 3 Denmark Rd Bridge Rol I -Code 2 Corridar&Intersection I. Roadside Hazard Safety Improvements This project provides for safety improvements on 14 different road segments to lessen the severity of run -off -the -road accidents by installing guardrail where necessary to protect roadside hazards. Signs such as advanced warning signs and chevrons for roadway curves, upgraded stop signs at intersections, and other delineation devices will be installed as recommended per MUTCD requirements to also prevent run -off -the -road accidents. This project is the highest priority for Kittitas County because it addresses the most common type of accidents on multiple roadway segments that scored high in the risk-based priorftlzation. These cost effective Improvements provide benefits to a number of locations, thereby improving the roadway network County wide. 2. Bridge Rail Improvements -Code 3 a. Phase 1 -County Maintenance Districts A -F I. 19 bridges or structures b. Phase 2- County Maintenance Districts G-1 1. 21 bridges or structures c. Phase 3- County Maintenance Districts 1-L 1. 20 bridges or structures Due to the large number of locations needing improvement, it is cost prohibitive to provide Improvements for all locations In a single project. Because of this, county -wide bridge rail Improvements will be executed in a number of projects. Each priority will include a number of locations that are grouped by County Maintenance Districts, and sized to be manageable phases for design and construction. The projects were then ranked based on the inadequacy of the bridge rail and then by the location in which the greatest benefit would be achieved.. Although not identified through the risk-based prioritization scoring, this project is a high priority for Kittitas County due to the number of locations observed to be at high risk with the potential for high severity accidents throughout the entire county road system. The potential accidents that this project would prevent are serious Injury and fatal accidents. The County has identified this widespread hazard and is taking a proactive, systemic approach to reduce future potential accidents. 10 There have been 60 bridges rated as Code 3, this rating reflects bridges with timber railing or no railing at all. Of all the bridges identified with substandard rail, these bridges or structures have the highest vulnerability because they provide no protection for an Errant vehicle. 3. Clear Zone inventory Through the data collection process and analysis of this safety pian, it has been identified that an Inventory of clear zones in Kittitas County would greatly benefit the process for future safety plans and project proposals. Up to date and accurate data allows the county to better Identify future project locations that support the goal of eliminating fatalities and serious Injuries on the road system. Although it has a lower priority than actual projects, it is a low cost proposal that could actually aid to the reduction of cost of future projects. This effort would include field data collection, database creation, and potentially scoping level mitigation opportunities Identified. 4. Denmark Road Safety Improvements Improvement of a sharp corner with steep embankments at MP 3.57 would aid to prevent run- off -road accidents on this specific road as it has a history of accidents at this location and was identified on a previous safety pian. The priority level is lower than other projects because it only targets a specific location and road characteristic. The county included multiple road segments to provide Improvements to this entire roadway corridor, from MP 0.50 to MP 4.35 which includes bundling bridge rail improvements to the project for efficiency and cost effective contract letting, S. Huntzinger Road Safety Improvements a. Phase 1 -MP 2.70 to MP 4.88 b. Phase 2 -MP 5.14 to MP 6.99 c. Phase 3 -MP 6.99 to MP 10.74 Huntzinger Road had several segments of road that scored high on the risk-based prioritization. Although there is no significant accident data to reflect the hazards, the road characteristics of the road show several areas of curves; both vertical and horizontal, steep embankments and no shoulder which are the largest contributing factors to run -off-road accidents. Guardrail, signing 11 and delineation improvements to this corridor are cost -prohibitive so the county has prioritized the phases in order of mlleposts. This project is a priority for Kittitas County because it prevents most common type of accident (run -off-road) and scored high on risk-based prioritization, and because recreation opportunities are rapidly Increasing along this roadway. It is a lower priority than other projects because we are already addressing the first roadway segment in a project to be constructed in 2017. 6. Bridge Rail Improvements -Code 2 a. Phase 1- County Maintenance Districts A -D i. 6 bridges or structures b. Phase 2- County Maintenance District E i. 16 bridges or structures c. Phase 3- County Maintenance District F 1. 17 bridges or structures d. Phase 4 County Maintenance District G 1. 21 bridges or structures e. Phase 5- County Maintenance District H-1 L 14 bridges or structures f. Phase 6- County Maintenance District J -K 1. 14 bridges or structures g. Phase 7- County Maintenance District L I. 12 bridges or structures The second-highest risk bridges or structures were rated as Code 2. These bridges have railing that does not meet modem standards for crashworthiness and do not have approach railing. Many of these bridges have w -section metal beam rail and steel posts attached to the outer edge of the bridge deck. This is a design that was crash tested and approved by FHWA in 1959 and has since been discontinued due to a tendency of the concrete deck to fall at the post connection upon impact, allow errant vehicles to continue off the deck. Bridges that lack approach railing do not provide any protection to an errant vehicle that leaves the roadway just before the bridges. There are 100 bridges that are coded 2 throughout Kittitas County. As with 12 priority 2, this project will be broken into 7 phases to create more manageable projects for design and construction. 7. Bridge (tail Improvements -Code i a. Phase 1- County Maintenance Districts Amp I. 2 bridges or structures b. Phase 2- County Maintenance District E i. 1 bridge or structure c. Phase 3- County Maintenance Districts F -L 1. 15 bridges or structures These bridges were identified with lower risk because they feature bridge rail and approaches; however, the rail and/or approaches and terminal do not meet current standards for crashworthiness and will need to be upgraded to maintain adequate protection for errant vehicles. There are 1S bridges and/or structures that have been rated as Code 1. These structures have rail and approaches yet do not meet code, The priority is low on this project as the bridges are functional but will need updated railing in the future to assist in preventing serious injury or fatal accidents. S. Corridor and Intersection Safety Improvements This project provides corridor -wide Improvements for the entire length of Vantage Highway with Intersection improvements for No. 6 Rd and Vantage Hwy. As well as two other Intersections along Kittitas Hwy at Matthews Rd and No. 6 Rd which have been identified for safety Improvements. Both Vantage Hwy and Kittitas Hwy are high -ADT corridors with an overall roadway that is In good condition with appropriate countermeasures in place. This project would provide monitoring and Identification of potential spot -improvements to areas within the Vantage Hwy corridor that may warrant updated safety features. While several segments of Vantage Highway scored high In risk-based prioritization, the evaluation of the accident types did not. Kittiias County recognizes that improvements to this corridor may provide benefit to a great number of travelers, and any improvements that could reduce potential future crashes are 13 beneficial the corridor is not substandard in a safety regard when compared to the entire County road network, and In most cases safety hazards are not easily identified. Kittitas Hwy has recently undergone large scale improvements. The county Is taking the Opportunity to evaluate the countermeasures recently Installed for performance success to see If intersection related accidents decrease. This will allow for identification of whether or not additional countermeasures may need to be implemented at the Matthews Rd and No. 6 Rd Intersections of Kittitas Hwy. The combination of accident history at No. 6 Rd and Vantage Hwy along with a site visit brought this segment into the list of projects. The Vantage Hwy/No. 6 Rd project would include providing an adequate clear zone, signs and possible realignment. Monitoring and evaluation will also continue at this location to identify potential safety Improvement opportunities. 14 Priority #I: Roadside Hazard Safety Imoravements ESTIMATED COST $690,x,, Guardrail, signs and delineation -$585,150 • Thorp Cemetery Rd has three sections of inadequate railing that requires replacement and curves that need del€neators and/or signs from MP 0.00 to MP 3.02 • Thorp Pralne has two segments selected in the safety plan. One segment has curves that need guardrail, signs and delineators between MP 0.00 to MP Z.O. The other segment has a curve with a steep embankment that may require guardrail along with signs and dellneators between M P 5.77 and MP 7.64 • Lower Peoh Point Rd has steep embankments and two curves In need of guardrail and signs between MP 2.90 and MP 5.03 Salmon La Sac Rd has guardrail, signs and dellneators but a portion of the road is reflecting accident data that Identify the need for additional guardrail, signs and/or delineators between MP 9.0 and MP 10.59 • Westside Rd has a segment between MP 2.14 and MP 3.94 - just outside the current projectthat also has curves and steep embankments that would benefit t • .�.-_.tib:.�,,� �. y�sAne+.ti.TAM uwrrr, ewe.. 9 .. JIIA dw Guardrail, signs and delineation -$585,150 • Thorp Cemetery Rd has three sections of inadequate railing that requires replacement and curves that need del€neators and/or signs from MP 0.00 to MP 3.02 • Thorp Pralne has two segments selected in the safety plan. One segment has curves that need guardrail, signs and delineators between MP 0.00 to MP Z.O. The other segment has a curve with a steep embankment that may require guardrail along with signs and dellneators between M P 5.77 and MP 7.64 • Lower Peoh Point Rd has steep embankments and two curves In need of guardrail and signs between MP 2.90 and MP 5.03 Salmon La Sac Rd has guardrail, signs and dellneators but a portion of the road is reflecting accident data that Identify the need for additional guardrail, signs and/or delineators between MP 9.0 and MP 10.59 • Westside Rd has a segment between MP 2.14 and MP 3.94 - just outside the current projectthat also has curves and steep embankments that would benefit from having guardrail, signs and delineation Installed. • Casassa Rd is a very cu rvy and steep road with steep embankments and very little countermeasures in place between MP 0.00 and MP 1.12 Signs and Delineation -$105,000 Lower Green Canyon Rd has two curves near the intersection of Hwy 97 that needs chevrons as well as advanced warning signs between MP 0.00 and MP 0.28 • Reecer Creek Rd near Dry Creek Rd Intersection between MP 0.26 and MP 0.312 needs advanced warning signs to identlfythe Intersection. +� Reecer Creek Rd has curves in several segments that need advanced warning signs, chevrons and/or other delineation between MP 4.80 and MP 6.68. • Wilson Creek Rd reflected a need for delineation to reduce run-off road accidents between MP 1.01 and MP 2.55 Wilson Creek Rd has curves and a previous realignment into an intersection that requires advanced warning signs, chevrons and delineation between MP 4.67 and MP 5.33 Brick Mill Rd has had several Intersection related accidents that could be reduced if advanced warning signs were installed near the Fairview Rd intersection between MP 3.93 and MP 4.87 Naneum lid requires advanced warning signs and installation of a larger stop sign for an intersection with Brick Mill Rd between MP 2.54 and MP 4.11 �i Priority #2: Bridge Rail improvements Code 3 Phase 1 is within County Maintenance Districts A -F with 19 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $559,914 Phase 21s within Gounty Maintenance District 6-1 with 21 bridges orstructures o ESTIMATED COST $524,418 Phase 3 Is within County Maintenance Districts J -L with 20 bridges orstructures 0 IcSTIMATEd COST $597,233 Bridges that have been coded 3 are severely inadequate bridges or structures with wood rail or no rail at all. There will be three projects by geographic location of code 3 bridges to allow for manageable and cost conscious improvements. 17 ra: 4�1i,a s.JW;T. r� �11�i�w► HIr �•1� 7Ci'■ "1 l Phase 1 is within County Maintenance Districts A -F with 19 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $559,914 Phase 21s within Gounty Maintenance District 6-1 with 21 bridges orstructures o ESTIMATED COST $524,418 Phase 3 Is within County Maintenance Districts J -L with 20 bridges orstructures 0 IcSTIMATEd COST $597,233 Bridges that have been coded 3 are severely inadequate bridges or structures with wood rail or no rail at all. There will be three projects by geographic location of code 3 bridges to allow for manageable and cost conscious improvements. 17 Priority 3: Clear Zone Inventory ESTIMATED COST $75,000 M f/ / J I -A e 7 �i 1 y.J 4�Ii11aliAY■■IYr i ■aaw awaaw.saF•• r � Oft"qr mom Nair •- sFrnw • ■ aswrura ■ � "•-`I{In1V�aJgAq j R � � .. • ■OtYM ■ L I �Mr■•7 {... tom= ar+a16 • Data collection of clear zones on Kittitas County road system to create hazard database and identify potential countermeasures. • Inventory fnced objects within the clear zone, such as utility poles, trees, irrigation structures, etc. 10 1$ Priori 4: Denmark Rd Safety Improvement ESTIMATED COST $291,513 lt 1 • . Yater �IIi 7l41f J., G — • .u.rs.w. 1 �.. �9"IMlC4N^t • Denmark Rd from MP 0.50 to MP 3.08 has several structures in need of adequate railing. • Denmark Rd from MP 3.08 to MP 4,35 has steep curves, both vertical and horizontal. The road narrows greatly at the corner with steep embankments on both sides of the road. The countermeasures In place are minimal and no rail is present at the corner. 19 Priori 5: Huntzin er Rd Safft Improvements i • Phase 1 is between MP 2.70 to MP 4.88 has several horizontal curves, steep embankments and no shoulder in places with minimal countermeasures In place. .� a3TIMATED COST $540,0W Phase 2 Is between MP 5.14 to MP 6.99 where there is steep embankments, no shoulder in areas and need of guardrail, signs and/or delineation. n ESTIMATED COST S540.OW Phase 3 is between MP 6.99 to MP 10.74 with sharp horizontal curves, vertical curves, steep embankments, very little to no shoulder and Inadequate clear zone. o ESTIMATED COSI" $540,000 �. _ 26, ilk IfNRM I r f i �.mo:eo'.xer !!1j • Phase 1 is between MP 2.70 to MP 4.88 has several horizontal curves, steep embankments and no shoulder in places with minimal countermeasures In place. .� a3TIMATED COST $540,0W Phase 2 Is between MP 5.14 to MP 6.99 where there is steep embankments, no shoulder in areas and need of guardrail, signs and/or delineation. n ESTIMATED COST S540.OW Phase 3 is between MP 6.99 to MP 10.74 with sharp horizontal curves, vertical curves, steep embankments, very little to no shoulder and Inadequate clear zone. o ESTIMATED COSI" $540,000 �. _ 26, ilk Priori 6: Bridge Rail Improvements Code 2 • Phase 1 Is within County Maintenance Districts A -D with 6 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $766,927 • Phase 2 is within County Maintenance District E with 16 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST !&MR,625 • Phase 3 is within County Maintenance District F with 17 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $974,967 • Phase 4 is within County Maintenance District G with 21 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $1,032,980 • Phase 5 is within County Maintenance Districts H-1 with 14 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $875,433 • Phase 6 is within County Maintenance Districts J -K with 14 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $754,201 • Phase 7 is within County Maintenance Districts L with 12 bridges or structures o ESTIMATED COST $548,920 • There are 100 bridges that have been coded 2 for inadequate rail with no approaches. • There will be seven projects by maintenance districts of coded bridges to allow for manageable and cost conscious improvements. 21 Priority 7: Bridge Rail Improvements Code 1 * Phase 1 Is within County Maintenance Districts A -D with 2 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $389,50 • Phase 2 is within County Maintenance District E with 1 bridges or structures ESTIMATED COST $938AM * Phase 3 is within County Maintenance District F -L with 17 bridges or structures i nMATED COST $429,573 • These bridges or structures will need upgraded rail and approaches to be brought up to standards to prevent serious Injury or fatality accidents if collision should occur. 22 Priors 8: Corridor and Intersection Improvements No Cost -Monitoring Stage Only -T 4-1 *-R Al .1 gnu.erw wn.err wNo w.w u..+rr max.-asex�� i�� T �•IYbW �-artxac Vantage Hwy has countermeasures in place but is also a road with higher ADT with increased probability of accidents. Monitoring and identification of possible spot fixes throughout the corridor 23 Kittitas Hwy has had safety improvements recently constructed in previous projects. The county would like to observe the recent improvements before enacting future safety projects. The two intersections that will be the focus of this monitoring project are at Matthews Rd at MP 1.56 and at No, 6 Rd at MP 2.36 No. 6 Rd intersection at Vantage Hwy may benefit from intersection related countermeasures, monitoring and evaluation will also continue at this location to identify potential safety improvement opportunities. 24 APPMMA FATAL and SERKILIS NAM Collisions in Kftnm Countw r ti 9 ti C C pCC C FATAL COLLISIONS E121763 8/20/2011 WESTSIDE RD 4.1 Y Over Embankment Tree or Stam Y Y Y Y Y Y 26 1265 35 E144064 12/18/2011 WILSON CREEK RD 2.3 Y Fence Over Embankment Y Y 26 1429 50 2$65428 5/4/20!2 LOOK RD 1A5 Y RoadwayDitch Y Y Y Y Y 28 1100 50 3202514 1/3/2019 FAIRVIEW RD 0.39 Pedestrian Y Y 22 2921501 2711015 8/20/2014 COLOCKIIM RD 18.5 Y Earth Bank Y Y 22 12 20 SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 2866168 11/!4/2011 DENMARK RD 3.57 Y Over Embankment Y Y Y Y 22 219 50 E179966 7/9/2012 WHITE RD 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y 28 292 25 2866172 9/27/2012 NANEUM RD 2.54 Y Roadway Ditch Y Y Y 20 334 50 E254795 7/4/20,13 VANTAGE HWY 13 Y Y Y 26 448 50 E256367 7/$/2013 VANTAGE HWY 301 Y Y 26 3609 50 E256365 7/9/2013 SALMON LAW RD 9.15 Y Over Embankment Y Y Y 30 578 35 2866344 10/23/2013 HULLFROG RD 2.03 Y Ur S Tree or Stump Y Y Y 28 4264 50 3202611 12/7/2013 BRICK MILL RD 4,1 Y Fence Y Y Y Y 20 272 35 815336 3/19f2014 COLOCKUM RD 0.17 Y Y Y 2050 E920254 4/11/2014 THORP PRAIRIE RD 539 Y Roadway Ditch Y Y Y Y 26 471 50 E329914 5/25/2014 REECER CREEK RD 8.5 Y Roadway Ditch Y Y 18 228 5D 835016 6/9/2014 VANTAGE HWY 5.57 Y Y 28 4930 50 E335626 6/14/2014 TEANAWAY RD 1.01,Y Earth Hank Y Y Y Y 24 271 50 E338378 6 2/2014 VANTAGE HWY 22.5 Y Guardrail Y Y Y Y 38 586 2867878 7/16/2014 VANTAGE HWY 4.48 Y I Y 128 4930 50 2867809 10/,12/2014 REECER CREEK RD 0.31 Y Y 49 2500 35 6419344 4/23/2D15 NELSON SIDING RD 0.79 Y Guardrail Y . Y 28 343 35 E427284 5/24/2015 PARKE CREEK RD 0.9 Y Utility Pole/Box Y 26 5501501 E462019 11/6/2015 ROBINSON CANYON RD 1.2 Y Y Y Y 221769150 25 APPENDIX 8 ROAD SEGMENT PRIONnUATION :R Z' z W E u c E EE lit M %W1 VANTAGE HWY 4.08 5.57 28 50 4930 10 0 0 0 801 75 165 21560 SALMON LA SAC RD 1.75 10.6 30 35 578 10 5 5 20 40 60 1411 94001 VANTAGE HWY 2.77 4.08 28 SO 1 5486 10 01 5 5 40 60 120 22710 WESTSIDF RD 3.94 4.17 26 35 1265 10 10 10 20 50 i5 115 63501 DENMARK RD 3.08 4.35 20 50 312 20 10 5 20 40 15 110 75D40 HUNTZINGER RD 5.14 6.99 24 50 734 20 20 20 20 0 30 110 28500 TEANAWAY RD 0.73 7.29 24 50 271 10 10 10 10 40 30 110 92275 BULLFROG RD 0.72 2.03 28 50 4264 10 10 10 20 1 40 15 105 93526 REECER CREEK RD 0.26 0.31 49 35 2500 10 0 1 5 20 40 30 105 94001 VANTAGE HWY 21.3 23.4 38 50 586 10 5 I 0 20 40 30 105 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 1.01 2.55 26 SD 673 10 51 10 0 50 30 105 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 5.77 7.64 26 50 471 10 10 5 20 40 15 100 55550 THORP CEMETERY RD 0 3.02 24 50 289 10 0 5 10 0 75 100 23030 NELSON SIDING RD 0.48 1.82 28 35 773 10 0 10 20 40 15 95 42000 NANEUM RD 2.54 4.11 20 50 372 1D 0 10 5 40 30 95 93525 REECER CREEK RD 4.8 6.58 24 50 376 20 0 5 10 0 60 95 22710 WEST5IDE RD 4.17 7.29 22 35 919 20 10 10 20 0 30 9D 41271 BRICK MILL RD 4.1 4.87 20 50 396 1 10 5 10 10 40 15 90 40761 LOOK RD 1.34 1.84 28 50 1100 10 5 30 10 5D 0 85 93526 REECER CREEK RD 6.68 8.7 18 50 228 10 5 5 5 40T 15 80 94001 VANTAGE HWY 11.2 I&G 26 50 448 10 5 0 10 40 15 80 63500 FAIRVIEW RD 0 0.98 22 50 292 10 10 5 0 50 0 75 95951 KIT ITAS HWY 1.52 2.36 28 50 1565 10 0 51 0 0 60 75 54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 1.2 2.72 22 50 285 10 0 5 5 40 15 75 75040 HUNTZINGER RD 2.7 1 4.88 24 50 889 10 20 1 20 20 .0 0 70 92275 BULLFROG RD 2.04 2.7 28 50 4405 10 5 20 20 01 15 70 26180 CASASSA RD 0 1.12 22 35 341 20 10 20 20 -OT 0 7D 22710 WESTSIDE RD 2.14 3.94 22 35 1454 10 10 10 10 0 30 70 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 0 3.51 26 50 180 1 20 5 5 20 0 15 65 96937 1 UMPTANUM RD 3.1 5.22 24 35 4031 20 10 0 20 0 15 65 75040 HUNTZINGER RD 6.99 10.7 24 50 3711 20 5 20 20 0 0 65 34383 LOWER GREEN CANYON RD 0 0.28 24 50 247 10 5 0 5 0 45 65 96200 NO.6 RD 0 0.26 24 50 2305 10 0 10 0 0 45 55 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 4.87 5.33 26 50 730 10 0 5 5 0 45 65 95400 CLEMAN RD 1.7 4.25 30 50 97$ 10 10 10 0 0 30 60 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 2.9 5.05 20 35 300 10 10 10 0 0 30 60 69370 PARKE CREEK RD 0.81 2.51t28 5D 550 10 0 5 5 40 0 60 24610 UPPER PEOH POINT RD 0 3.16 35 1271 10 5 5 10030 60 43132 THOMAS RD 0 1.51 5Q I 317 I10 0 SO 20 0 15 55 25 27 APPENDDCB ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION �e z E E ¢ e e s 13 X C '� � 8 c o vr 43853 COOKE CANYON RD 0 2.04 24 50 196 10 10 20 0 0 15 55 40600 BRICK RD L12 1.22 22 35 1775 10 5 5 5 01 30 55 12650 KACHESS LAKE RD 0 1.76 26 35 244 10 5 5 20 1 01 15 55 22710 WESTSIDE RD 0.25 2.14 34 35 1331 10 5 5 20 0 15 55 40772 LYONS RD 0 1.49 1B 5D 260 20 10 20 0 0 0 50 95301 MANASTA5H RD 5.56 11 22 35 $67 10 10 10 20 0 0 50 64756 UPPER BADGER POCKET RD 1.27 5.61 22 50 305 10 O 5 20 0 15 56 92275 BULLFROG RD 0 0.72 28 35 3545 10 0 5 20 0 is 50 22512 LAMBERT RD 0 1.09 20 35 218 10 5 20 0 0 15 5D 93526 REELER CREEK RD 2.26 4.8 28 50 688 10 0 5 5 01 30 50 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0.43 1.55 24 50 1 1739 10 0 5 5 0 30 1 50 95611 BROWN RD 1.81 2.68 18 50 720 10 10 10 20 0 0 50 92275 BULLFROG RD 2.03 2.04 10 50 4264 10 0 20 20 0 0 50 96076 1 CANYON RD 3.02 5A7 40 50 2128 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 96400 1 CLEMAN RD L4 1.7 28 50 1259 10 20 20 0 1 0 0 50 75040 HUNT,ZINGER RD 0.24 2.7 24 50 437 20 5 20 S 01 0 50 96951 KITTITAS HWY 3.36 3.82 28 50 2315 10 0 10 0 0 30 5D 96951 KRTITAS HWY 3.82 4.87 28 50 2349 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 22770 LOWER PEON POINT RD 0.34 0.59 22 35 9991 10 20 5 0 0 15 50 96200 NM 6 RD 3.58 5.1 22 50 715i 10 0 5 5 0 30 50 40315 SANDERS RD D.5 1.03 20 35 1216 10 0 20 5 0 15 5D 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 6.54 6.63 24 35 370 10 0 20 20 0 p 1 50 95301 MANASTASH RD 0.74 1.36 26 50 1532 10 10 10 ol 0 15 45 69370 PARKE CREEK RD 2.61 4.64 22 50 242 10 10 5 20 D 0 45 42271 ALFORD RD 0.15 1.02 22 50 5941 10 10 20 5 0 0 45 21900 GOLF COURSE RD 0.11 DA2 28 35 2335 10 5 10 20 0 0 45 21900 GOLF COURSE RD 0.42 0.89 28 35 1056 10 5 10 20 0 0 45 95600 HANSON RD 0 0.81 29 50 1206 10 5 20 10 0 0 45 1265D KACHESS LAKE RD 1.76 3.4 26 35 244 10 10 5 20 0 0 45 96951 KITTITAS HWY 1.34 1.52 1 28 50 4407 10 0 5 0 0 30 45 40761 LOOK RD 0.69 1.34 28 50 1271 10 5 5 10 0 15 45 95301 MANASTASH RD 3.56 5.55 22 35 509 10 5 20 10 D 0 45 40315 SANDERS RD 0.13 0.25 20 35 2117 10 0 20 0 0 15 45 5277070 THORP PRAIRIE RD 3.65 4.42 26 50 471 10 5 5 10 0 15 45 94001 VANTAGE HWY 18.5 21.3 26 50 586 10 5 5 10 0 15 45 13700 VIA KACHESS RD 0 2.22 24 25 104 5 0 20 20 0 0 45 25620 WATSON CUTOFF RD 0 1.12 22 35 283 5 10 10 26 0 0 45 25480 WEST FORK TEANAWAY RD 0 0.68 24 50 185 10 5 10 5 0 15 45 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 335 4.72 24 50 687 10 D s 10 D 15 40 27 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIONITIZATION ak a s a E ' p E v H E Jq a z o � IV r N � E 53650 BARNES RD 0 0.78 20 50 307 10 10 10 10 ol 0 40 41271 BRICK MILL RD 3.22 4.1 20 35 272 10 0 10 5 0 15 40 63500 94051 FAIRVIEW RD GAME FARM RD 0.98 1.04 1.94 2.54 22 20 50 50 2067 244 10 ID 10 101 S 20 0 0 0 0 15 0 40 40 54250 KILLMORE RD 6.18 2.44 20 501 200 10 10 10 10 0 0 40 42271 ALFORD RD D 0.15 28 50 543 10 5 5 20 0 0 40 95611 BROWN RD 1.16 1.8 20 50 748 10 10 10 101 ol 0 40 95600 HANSON RD 1.5 1.96 28 50 475 10 0 5 lol 015 40 40761 LOOK RD 1.84 2.88 28 50 10D0 10 5 5 5 0 15 40 23030 N E LSON SIDING RD 3.04 4.37 28 35 343 SO 0 10 20 0 0 40 13530 95417 SPARKS RD THORP HWY SOUTH 0.41 1.74 0.89 3.35 26 24 35 50 766 6B7 10 10 0 0 10 5 5 10 0 0 15 15 40 40 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 4.42 5.14 26 50 471 10 5 5 20 0 0 40 52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 5.14 5.77 1 26 50 471 10 5 5 20 0 0 40 96751 THRALL RD 0,15 2.1 26 50 1267 10 5 5 5 0 15 40 96751 THRALL RD 2.18 3.14 26 50 864 10 5 5 5 0 15 40 94001 VANTAGE HWY 2.53 2-77 28 50 6140 10 0 0 0 0 30 40 63501 DENMARK RD 0.5 3.08 20 501 319 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 7.69 10.4 20 50 257 10 0 5 20 0 0 35 31510 HUNGRYJUNCTION RD 1.74 2.84 20 50 953 10 1 5 20 0 0 0 35 54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 0.09 0.96 20 50 815 10 0 10 0 0 15 35 68910 BADGER POCKET RD 0 0.57 22 50 639 10 0 5 5 1 0 15 35 69511 CLERF RD D 3.88 24 50 543 10 10 10 5 0 0 35 43883 COOKE CANYON RD 2.04 2.55 22 50 1 196 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 95600 HANSON RD 0.9 1.5 28 50 1069 10 5 10 10 ol 0 35 42000 NANEUM RD 0 1 20 35 435 SO 0 10 0 ol l5 35 96751 THRALL RD 4.69 5.68 26 50 630 10 0 5 5 D 15 35 94001 VANTAGE HWY 6.56 7.56 28 50 1448 10 5 5 0 0 15 35 25850 HORVATT RD 0 0.46 18 35 123 5 10 10 10 0 0 35 31510 HUNGRYJUNCn0N RD 2.84 3.25 20 50 753 10 0 10 D 0 15 35 96951 KITTITA5 HWY 4.87 5,3 28 50 2863 10 5 5 0 1 0 15 35 42000 NANEUM RD 5.13 7.33 22 50 252 10 5 10 10 0 0 35 69760 PFENNING RD 0.97 1.08 20 35 871 1D 0 10 0 0 is 35 15740 RAILROAD ST 0 0.71 32 35 803 10 0 0 10 0 15 35 40315 SANDERS RD 1.03 1.13 20 35 1216 10 0 10 0 0 15 35 13530 SPARKS RD 0 0.41 28 35 1634 10 0 5 5 0 15 35 28500 TEANAWAY RD 0 D.02 24 50 564 5 20 5 5 p D 35 64756 UPPER BADGER POCKET RD 0 1.27 26 5D 507 10 5 0 20 D 0 35 94001 VANTAGE HWY 7.56 9,6 26 50 852 10 I 5 5 0 0 15 35 28 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITRATION d 3: In ri 13 E Ml Lu a 2E t� A 94126 35285 WILSON CREEK RD ROBBINS RD 2.55 0 4.09 2.07 24 22 50 50 513 182 10 10 ol 5 1 5 5 5 10 ol 0 is 0 35 30 68515 CARROLL RD 0 1.53 20 50 176 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 96865 TJOSSEM RD 3.12 SAS 28 50 840 SD 0 5 0 0 15 30 68910 BADGERPOCKETRD 3.35 4.39 18 50 287 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 41271 BRICK MILL RD 0.97 2.42 20 50 546 10 10 30 0 0 D 30 95630 BRONDTRD 0 D-62 20 50 221 10 10 10 oi 0 1 0 30 95611 BROWN RD 0 1.16 20 35 726 10 10 5 51 ol 0 30 67014 FOURTH PARALLEL RD 2.75 4.65 20 50 266 10 101 10 ol 0-f 0 30 94326 NO. 81 RD 2.54 4.07 28 50 1 538 10 0 5 0 0 1 15 30 66912 SORENSON RD 2.55 4.1 22 50 293 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0 0.34 28 50 4063 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 4.09 4.57 26 50 513 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 94026 AIRPORT RD 1 1.26 36 35 895 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 93075 BENDER RD 0.59 0.68 20 35 1959 10 101 10 01 0 0 30 63500 FAIRVIEW RD 1.94 3.5 1 28 50 591 1 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 94051 GAME FARM RD 0.67 1.04 24 35 982 10 10 10 0 0 0 30 96951 KITTITAS HWY 1.03 1.34 28 35 3826 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 96951 KITTITAS HWY 5.38 5.49 28 35 655 10 0 20 0 0 0 30 953D1 MANASTASH RD 1.36 3.35 24 50 1526 10 10 30 0 0 0 30 420DD NANEUM RD 7.33 8.94 24 50 252 10 5 5- 101 01 0 30 96200 NO.6 RD 1.02 1.85 26 50 1916 1 10 0 5 DI 01-15 30 96200 NO.6 RD 2.22 2.61 26 50 787 10 5 0 0 0 15 3D 93526 REELER CREEK RD 0.76 1.26 38 50 1176 10 0 5 0 0 15 30 54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 0.96 1.2 20 50 769 10 0 5 1-20 0 0 15 90 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 5.65 5.42 22 35 1145 10 0 10 10 0 0 30 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0.34 0.43 24 50 2373 10 D p 0 0 30 93041 UNIVERSITY WAY 1.47 1.54 40 40 9101 10 0 0 20 0 0 30 93041 UNIVERSITY WAY 1.54 1.94 40 40 1 3648 10 01 0 20 D 0 30 94001 VANTAGE 2.03 2.53 28 50 1 7311 10 ol 5 0 0 15 30 94001 VANTAGE HWY 1.28 1.53 32 35 7375 10 0 0 5 0 15 30 94001 VANTAGE HWY 16.6 18.5 38 50 528 10 0 0 5 0 151 30 94001 VANTAGE HWY 23.4 27.5 26 5D 586 10 5 5 10 0 0 30 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 5.33 5.66 24 50 580 10 0 5 0 D 15 30 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 7.4 8.94 24 50 177 10 0 10 lol 0 0 30 93075 BENDER RD 0 0.59 24 35 1245 10 10 5 0 0 0 25 41271 BRICK MILL RD 0.09 0.97 22 50 485 1D 10 5 0 D 0 25 93025 DRY CREEK RD 2.32 2.42 24 35 258 10 5 5 5 0 0 25 94051 GAME FARM RD 0 0.28 24 35 991 10 5 10 0 0 0 25 29 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATIO N d 2 Lai z ffi N E A � a � o o a E N 3 � 64 64 Ib N 63245 PAYNE RD 0 1.55 18 50 220 10 0 10 5 0 0 25 96865 TJOSSEM RD D 0.98 28 50 699 10 5 S 5 0 0 25 96937 UMPTANUM RD 0.75 1.07 38 50 3363 10 0 5 101 p 1 0 25 68910 BADGER POCKET RD 1.3 3.35 1 20 501 229 101 5 1 10 ol 0 0 25 41271 BRICK MILL RD 5.13 6.19 20 50 341 10 5 10 0 1 0 0 25 31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 3.25 4.27 26 50 767 10 0 10 5 0 0 25 96951 KITTITAS HWY 2.36 2.64 28 50 4407 10 5 10 0 0 0 25 96951 KITTITAS HWY 2.64 3.36 28 50 4407 10 5 10 0 0 0 25 22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 1.44 2.9 22 35 545 10 5 5 5 0 1 0 25 42000 NANEUM RD 1 1.52 22 50 379 1 10 0 1 0 0 0 15 25 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 5.48 5.54 2$ 35 1145 10 ol 5 101 0 o 25 96751 THRALL RD 1.1 2.18 26 SO 1094 10 5 5 S 1 0 0 25 96751 THRALL RD 5.68 6.23 20 50 180 10 0 0 ol 0 I 15 25 25480 WEST FORK TEANAWAY RD 0.68 1.14 10 50 185 10 5 5 5 Q 0 25 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 4.57 4.87 25 50 277 10 5 5 5 0 0 25 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 6.66 7.4 24 50 303 10 0 10 51 D 0 25 40772 LYONS RD 4 6.3 26 50 276 10 1 5 5 ol 0 0 20 60640 ANDERSON RD 0.32 0.38 32 35 2976 10 0 10 0 0 0 20 93025 DRY CREEK RD 1.7$ 1 2.32 36 35 258 10 0 5 5 0 0 20 34383 LOWER GREEN CANYON RD 0.28 3.88 22 50 247 10 5 0 5 0 0 2Q 62502 MOF RD 0 L63 20 50 314 10 0 10 0 0 0 20 94001 VANTAGE HWY 9.6 10.7 26 50 823 10 5 5 0 0 0 20 94001 VANTAGE HWY 10.7 11.2 28 50 823 10 5 5 01 0 0 20 60640 ANDERSON RD 0 0.32 1 32 35 2417 10 0 10 0 D Cl20 95501 COVE RD 3.14 3.72 24 50 362 10 5 5 0 0 0 20 93025 DRY CREEK RD 0.99 1.15 28 35 639 10 5 5 0 0 0 20 95600 HANSON RD 1.96 3.07 28 50 5801 10 0 10 0 0 0 20 96951 KITTITAS HWY 5.3 5.36 28 35 2863 10 01 5 5 0 0 20 95301 MANASTASH RD 0 0.74 28 50 1737 16 5 5 0 0 0 20 94326 NO. 91 RD 0.53 1 24 35 1762 10 0 1Q 0 0 0 20 21560 SALMON LA SAC RD 0 1.12 30 35 1260 la 0 5 5 p 1 0 20 96937 UMPTANUM RD 0.24 0.5 32 35 4991 10 0 5 5 0 0 20 96937 UMPTANUM RD 1.69 2.68 26 50 9141 10 0 5 51 0 0 20 24610 UPPER PEOH POINT RD 3.66 5.32 26 35 6871 10 0 5 5 0 0 20 54150 WEAVER RD 0 2.18 20 50 3171 10 0 5 5 0 0 20 13550 WEST SPARKS RD 0 0.85 28 35 398 10 0 5 5 0 O 20 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 0 0.5 22 35 1601 10 0 10410 0 0 20 93047 OLD HIGHWAY TEN 0.42 1.09 28 50 2225 10 0 5 D 015 69370 PARKE CREEK RD 0.28 0.81 28 50374 10 0 5 0 Q 15 30 31 APPENDIX B ROAD SEGMENT PRIORITIZATION e w � ° E t IL IL E E E E 96937 UMPTANUM RD 0.5 D.69 40 35 5306 10 ol 0 5 0 0 15 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 0.63 1.01 24 35 1429 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 41271 BRICK MILL RD 4.87 5.13 22 50 297 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96076 CANYON RD 2.17 2.92 40 50 3877 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 63500 FAIRVIEW RD 7.42 8.07 22 5D 375 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 40761 LOOK RD 0 0,59 28 50 IS901 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 42000 NANEUM RD 1.99 2.54 24 50 334 10 0 5 0 0 D I 15 96200 NO.6 RD 0.36 0.68 24 50 23U 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 96200 NO.6 RD 0.86 1.02 24 50 1916 10 0 5 0 ol 0 15 96200 NO.6 RD 2.61 3.05 26 50 865 10 01 5 0 0 0 15 93526 REECER CREEK RD 1.26 2.26 34 50 1807 10 0 1 5 0 0 0 15 95417 THORP HWY NORTH 5.54 5.65 28 50 1148 10 ol 5 0 0 D 15 96751 THRALL RD 6.23 7.25 20 50 180 10 D 5 0 0 0 15 96865 TJOSSEM RD 1.39 1.66 28 1 50 764 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 96937 UMPTANUM RD 0.69 0.75 38 35 3363 10 0 0 5 0 0 15 96937 UMPTANUM RD 1.07 1.19 34 50 2428 10 0 5 Q 0 0 15 99001 VANTAGE 1.53 1.65 28 35 5672 10 0 5 0 0 0 15 94001 1 VANTAGE 1.65 2.03 28 50 5672 10 0 5 D 0 D 15 65002 PRATER RD 0 1.42 22 5Q 212 10 0 0 D 0 0 SO 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 1.66 1.74 24 50 687 10 0 0 ol 0 0 14 96751 THRALL RD 3.14 4.17 26 50 542 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 41010 BOWERS RD 1 1.51 1 36 35 1 225 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 29510 MIDDLE FORK TEANAWAY RD 0 0.02 20 50 1 1121 5 0 5 0 ol 0 10 42000 1 NANEUM RD 1.52 1.99 24 50 334 10 0 0 0 D 0 10 96200 NO.6 RD 0.26 0.36 24 50 2314 10 0 0 0 0-0 10 96200 N0.6 RD 0.68 0.86 24 50 2057 10 0 0 0 0 D 10 94326 NO, 81 RD 1 2.54 24 50 840 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 15740 RAILROAD ST 1.36 1.81 1 28 35 305 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 93525 REECER GREEK RD 0 0.05 64 35 2612 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 93526 REECER CREEK RD 0.64 0.76 38 35 3093 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 1.55 1.66 24 5D 1739 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 96751 THRALL RD 4.17 4.69 26 50 848 10 0 0 0 D 0 10 96937 UMPTANUM RD 1.19 1,69 34 5D 2612 10 0 0 0 0 ol 10 94001 I VANTAGE HWY 5.57 1 5.56 1 28 50 2699 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 31 KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: May 22, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: Sign A Revised Ground Lease Between Kittitas County Public Works and the Kittitas County Sheriffs Office for Lot 2 of the Boat Ramp Short Plat, Vantage Washington BACKGROUND: On August 19, 2014, pending the completion of the Boat Ramp Short Plat, the Department of Public Works and the Kittitas County Sheriffs Office entered into a Revocable License Agreement for land at the Vantage Park on which the sheriff s rescue boat facility was constructed on. INTERACTION: The short plat has been completed. Lot 2 consists of a total of 7,201 sq. ft. with 2597 sq. ft. of the lot identified as non - buildable as it falls with the 60 Ft. easement for access to the public parking area. Public Works recommends that the revocable license agreement be converted to a long term tease agreement for Lot 2 for the total net buildable land in the amount of 4,604 Sq. Ft. at $0.09 per Sq. Ft. for the first 5 year period. At the May 2, 2017 Agenda with the Board of County Commissioner's a Lease was approved. After review by Public Works star it was recognized that the square footage and lease amount were incorrect. Staff is presenting the revised lease for signature. Kittitas County Public Works Kittitas County Sheriff s Office RECOMMENDATION: Sign the Ground Lease between Kittitas County Public Works and the Kittitas County Sheriff s Office for Lot 2 of the Boat Ramp Short Plat, Vantage Washington HANDLING: Return one (1) original to Public Works Return one (1) original to KC Sheriff s Office ATTACHMENT: Ground Lease between Kittitas County Public Works and the Kittitas County Sheriff s Office for Lot 2 of the Boat Ramp Short Plat, Vantage Washington LEAD STAFF: Mark Cook LEASE THIS LEASE is made and entered effective the 1 lc day of Jun, 2016, by and between Kittitas County Public Works, hereinafter referred to as the LESSOR, and Kittitas County Sheriff's Q#6ice, hereinafter referred to as the LESSEE. WITNESSETH: The Lessor hereby agrees to lease to the Lessee, and the Lessee hereby agrees to lease frum the Lessor, the following described real property. Lot 2 of the Boat Kamp Short Plat, Kittites County, Washington, further described as follows: Lot 2 consists of a total of 7,201 square feet with 2,597 square feet of the lot identified as non -buildable as it falls within the 60 foot easement for access to the public parldng area for a total net buildable land area totaling 4604 square feet. This lease is made in pursuant to the aut hwity of Chapter 2.81 KCC. 1. TERM The term of this lease shall be for thirty-five (35) years and will commence on the 1' day of June, 2016 and terminate on the 31st day of -%ky, 2051, except as provided hereunder. (a) Lessee and Lessor agree that the parties may modify the terms of this lease, in whole or in part, including but not limited to modifying the area of land covered by this lease, the rental due, the term of duration of this lease and/or any other term of condition of this lease, but only upon such terms as are nmatually agreed upon in writing.. (b) In the event that Lessor finds it necessary to terminate this lease for reasons not reasonably anticipated at the time of entering into the lease, Lessor shall do so only upon one hundred twenty (120) days written notice, notifying lessee at Lessee's address of record, that the lease to which this applied is being terminated. Lessee's sole basis for termination of the lease sball be a permanent change in the water level or course of the Columbia River that makes the described property not reasonably useable for the Lessee's purpose in eatmsing this lease, Lessee's boating operations on the Columbia River. (c) In the event chat the lease is terminated, all rents sha11 be pro -rated to the date Lessee shall have restored the premises to the Lessor in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement governing Lessee's duties to restore the premises to Lessor upon expiration of the lease term. (d) It is further agreed that any modification or termination of this lease pursuaut to the terms of the lease shall not give rise to any cause of action for damages or any other form of relief by Lessee against Lessor or any successor lessee. (e) In the event of such terminaticm, Lessee understands that other tram a refund of any unearned rent prorated to the date Lessee has restored the premises to Lessor, Lessee shall have no claim for compensation as occasioned by said modification or termination. y'T: Rent shall be paid in advance on an annual basis, with the first payment due on or before the 1 st day of June of each year and continuing thereafter until termination of this lease. The rental rate for each year is as follows: Prosecutor reviewed 04/11/2017 KITTITAS COUNTY 3. ADJUSTMENT OF RQ'jT—AL: The dental for every five year period thca+eafter, or part thereof; at the cmmeacernent of such period, shall be readjusted and hared by the Board of County Commissioners; (a) After each five year period of this lease, the Lessor shall have the right to readjust the rent on or before February V of the firth year of this lease for the subsequent five year period, and the increase shall BE THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF THE CPI INDEX OVER THE PREVIOUS FIVE YEARS. The first five year period shall be run Srom January I, 2016 to December 31, 2020, and each five year period used for the purposes of calculating the increase in rent shall be set in the same mamer thereafter for the remainder of the period of the lease. The rent increase is at the sole discretion of the Lessor, and Lessor may elect to maintain the rent at the previous rate. It is agreed between LESSOR and LESSEE that the. following CPI Index will be used for future rental increases: "CPI — All Cities -All Items Size Class D Under 50,000." 4. LTILITIES: The Lessee shall pay for extension of and all utility services supplied to the premises. Any such cde nsi.ons shall be subject to the advame review of the Lessor. 5. PURPOSE: The Lessee shall utilize the premises primarily for Sheriffs Office purposes. f. DVKQ upon termination of this lease, for whatever reason and under whatever circumstances, all en#s remaining upon the leased premises become the property of Lessor, free and clear, without any liability of Lessor to Lessee. Should Lessor desire the removal of Lessee's improvements upon the date of lease termination. Lessor shall give Lessee written notice to remove all improvements and return the premises to its state as before the lease at Ieast thirty (30) days prior to the termination date for the lease. Upon removal, the premises shall be left in a neat and orderly condition, without debris and shall be graded level. Should the premises not be left in such condition, after Lessee received such notice, Lessor may remove improvements and repair the premises and seek reimbursement from Lessee in any manner allowed by law. In the event the Lessee exercises the option to remove building and impmovemarrts or is otherwise directed to remove said building and improvements, the work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the termination of the lease. The Lessee shall provide the Lessor notice in writing at least 30 days Prior to the termination of this lease of Lessee's intent far such removal. In die event notice is not given, or the Lessee fails to complete such removal within the prescribed time limits, the bdddmg and other improvements shall become the property of the Lessor and any removal costs shall be assessed the Lessee. PAGE 2 Rental Rate (Ground Lease) Term (4,604 Sq. Ft at $.04 per Sq. Ft} 06/01/16 — 05/31/21 $414.36 06/01/21 Recalculate as described below 3. ADJUSTMENT OF RQ'jT—AL: The dental for every five year period thca+eafter, or part thereof; at the cmmeacernent of such period, shall be readjusted and hared by the Board of County Commissioners; (a) After each five year period of this lease, the Lessor shall have the right to readjust the rent on or before February V of the firth year of this lease for the subsequent five year period, and the increase shall BE THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF THE CPI INDEX OVER THE PREVIOUS FIVE YEARS. The first five year period shall be run Srom January I, 2016 to December 31, 2020, and each five year period used for the purposes of calculating the increase in rent shall be set in the same mamer thereafter for the remainder of the period of the lease. The rent increase is at the sole discretion of the Lessor, and Lessor may elect to maintain the rent at the previous rate. It is agreed between LESSOR and LESSEE that the. following CPI Index will be used for future rental increases: "CPI — All Cities -All Items Size Class D Under 50,000." 4. LTILITIES: The Lessee shall pay for extension of and all utility services supplied to the premises. Any such cde nsi.ons shall be subject to the advame review of the Lessor. 5. PURPOSE: The Lessee shall utilize the premises primarily for Sheriffs Office purposes. f. DVKQ upon termination of this lease, for whatever reason and under whatever circumstances, all en#s remaining upon the leased premises become the property of Lessor, free and clear, without any liability of Lessor to Lessee. Should Lessor desire the removal of Lessee's improvements upon the date of lease termination. Lessor shall give Lessee written notice to remove all improvements and return the premises to its state as before the lease at Ieast thirty (30) days prior to the termination date for the lease. Upon removal, the premises shall be left in a neat and orderly condition, without debris and shall be graded level. Should the premises not be left in such condition, after Lessee received such notice, Lessor may remove improvements and repair the premises and seek reimbursement from Lessee in any manner allowed by law. In the event the Lessee exercises the option to remove building and impmovemarrts or is otherwise directed to remove said building and improvements, the work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the termination of the lease. The Lessee shall provide the Lessor notice in writing at least 30 days Prior to the termination of this lease of Lessee's intent far such removal. In die event notice is not given, or the Lessee fails to complete such removal within the prescribed time limits, the bdddmg and other improvements shall become the property of the Lessor and any removal costs shall be assessed the Lessee. PAGE 2 KITTITAS COUNTY 7. RUA=: : 'Ihe roan tenance and repair of the structure and other improvements shall be the responsibility of the Lessee, including utilities within the leased area. (a) The Lessee fiuthcr agrees that it will not c imiit waste and that it will keep said premises in a safe, sanitary, neat, prosentablej and otherwise good condition, and in general shall comply with all the applicable governmental rules, ordinances and regulations as may be required or imposed by such authorities on said premises and shall comply with any direction pursuant to law of any public officer or officers who shall be empowered to enfo(rw local, state and federal rules, regulations and ordinances upon the Lessee with respect to the said premises or the use, occupancy, or control thereof and shall not su ffa any improper or offensive use of said premises. B. AREA MAANCE: Lessee shall, during the term of this lease, maintain the area between the building and boundary line of said lease to the satisfaction of the Lessor. The area shall be kept free of all debris, weeds and brush for the tam of this lease. Lessee shall reimburse the KitdW County Weed Authority or Kittitas County Department of Public Works for any costs incurred in the event that the County Weed Authority or Kittitas County Deparhnent of Public Works undertakes noxious weed or vegetation control measures. 9. N(MCES: Any notice given by one party to the other in connection with this agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested as follows: (a) Ifto Lessor, addressed to: Kittitas County Department of Public Works 411 N. Ruby, Suite #1 Ellensburg, Washington 98926 (b) If to Lessee, addressed to: ICittitas County Sheers Of 307 W. Umpumm Ellemburg, WA 98926 Notice shall be deemed to have been received on the date of receipt as shown on the retean receipt. 10. ASSIGNi ILW: The Lessee shall not assign this lease nor sublet any portion thereof without first obtaining the written consem of the Lessor. 11. HOLD HARi+,rr FSS- The Lessee hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Lessor from any and all claims or demands whatsoever arising out of any loss, damage, or injury to persons or property resulting from the Lessee's use or occupancy of said premises and leased area, or caused by the acts or neglect of the Lessee, his agents or employees. 12. DEFALiLT: In the event the Lessee shall fail to comply with any of Lessee's commitnrents, duties or r0sponsrbilities under this least, or any of its conditions or terms as herein stated, the Lessor may terminate this lease by giving thirty (30) days written notice of the conditions or terms being violated. If said faihsures are not corrected within the thirty (30) day period, this lease may be terminated and the PAM 3 KIITITAS COUNTY Lessor shall be entitled to peaceably retake possession of the premises, provided the Lessee shall have the right to remove improvements as herem provided. In addition to the provisions hereinabove, and/or as an alternative or cumulative remedy, Lessor may, at its sole election, pursue any other action, redress, or remedy now or hereafter available to Lessor under the laws of the State of Washington, including its Landlord Tenant laws. 13. WAIVER: No assent, express or implied, by the Lessor to any breach of any of Lessee's covenants, ate, conditions or teams hereof shall be deemed or taken to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of any covenant, agreement, condition or team hereof 14. APPLICABILITY: The covenants, agreements, teams and conditions contained in this lease shall apply to and be binding upon Lessor and Lessee and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successor and assigns. 15. _L'_�l"I QRATION: Exhibits and Recitals . are incorporated herein by this reference. This Lease embodies the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein contained. No amendments or modifications hereof shall be enforceable unless in writing, signed by the party to be charged. W WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lessor and Lessee have signed their names and affixed their seals the day and year first above written. LESSOR: BOARD OF COUNTY COIVIIVIISSIONERS Kr=AS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Attest: Paul Jewell, Chairman ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik Laura Osiadarz, Vice -Chairman E l Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz Obie O'Brien, Commissioner LESSEE: i 6e I � i Address: Kittitas County SheriErs Office 307 W. Umptanum Ellensburg, WA 98926 PAGE 4 K]C=AS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT STUDY SESSION DATE: May 22, 2017 ACTION REQUESTED: Request to Approve the Resolution to Award the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program Contract. BACKGROUND: The Department of Public Works solicited bids for the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program in accordance with RCW 39.04.155, Small Works Roster Contract Procedures. Sealed Bids were opened on May 12, 2017. Two (2) bids were received for the prescribed work. The lowest responsive bid was from Stripe Rite, Inc., in the amount of $233,936.10. The second bid from Apply -A -Line, Inc. in the amount of $294,$33.00. The Engineer's Estimate is $246,309.40. INTERACTION: Public Works RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the Resolution to Award the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program Contract and authorize the Director of Public Warks to sign said contract documents. HANDLING: Return a copy of the Resolution to Public Works. ATTACHMENT'S: Resolution Bid Tabulations LEAD STAFF: Mark Cook Director BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE 2017 ANNUAL PAINT STRIPE PROGRAM AND AUTHORI7.)E THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAME VF'IIERFM: The Department of Public Works solicited bads for the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program in accordance with RCW 39,04.155 Small Works Roster Contract Procedures; and WHEREAS: Sealed bids were opened on May 12, 2017 at 10.00 a.m. in the Kittitas County Permit Center, Department of Public Works, 411 N. Ruby Street, Suite 1, Ellensburg, Washington; and WHEREAS: Two (2) bids were received for the prescribed work. The Director of Public Works recommends the lowest responsive bid from Stripe Rite Inc., of $233,936.10 be accepted. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby award the contract for the 2017 Annual Paint Stripe Program in the amount of $233,936.10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director for the Department of Public Works is authorized to sign the contract documents for said project. DATED on this 22nd day of May, 2017, at Ellensburg, Washington. Attest: ❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik ❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KIT'1TTAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Paul Jewell, Chairman Laura Osiadacz, Vice -Chairman Obie O'Brien, Commissioner O U! Ln O O O un of 0 0 0 88 0 S a-1 V co w a! N N m N Ln en ri n "I Ln r3 C V1 N •F ic"0wq oO tD !p ry ry OF. LeLe N «!v! OO EO m civ N N m w` cin M.td��ao gcco 10 $o Lnm 4 m N N N Ln Q Iff! M1 1O n a0 O fm0 Lpqp !fl 1,1�! M�1 1ty� {*1 c t1'1 G� OQ Q 00 -4 gtjQ 1Y pn lCryO O! Yom! �0 G0 �O pM! N s � O CL u N U'y wt irL i/} v} Vi vs -us VF foo$ Dogs og $a t� civ gi r©vcn 11 ,w nl en m co r" cnn m W N w wr w► w► us +rf v► wt +rt VII ws N 4 !p n i 0. Go !4 Com! Nt pp 4 V N M S p lit °�r! O a, alb tF CO 1- s+rr ���}alaw ri v! 6 C r! n n LD wm N CO n m U2 +-! Qom! H h w . O m d! p u N '� !o vNoaomn a 4 . N n� Off! ffr 14 F � .t..� nv�' 19 y N Sf� ww i!F V► wt VI. wl wy &7A— V4 %&I—l— w} A4 an Y+ LU LU 0000 00 vC?9 ppM0 in0 zU NeQy1M pvm000 Umvv� Qa rm v Baa 3a!u' 3 3 ws +/f +h wF N h th 4A of wl, CL z LU z d� z z z W F M S N 2 Zz a yyy111 Lu Z Z OG 5 cm U05 F j Ln yyyZ!!! axon !!J y a a. A W ®+ !G Z LU W z LouW~ z wLU W Z C V? X W a fppa CJ 2 c W- W {ylu/! 3 !7l F DLAp I d �y J �y CL jta LJ ,O,,!! Ll .l = ' 3 Jt = 3 3 � � a W H z ML& D o 0 o x o p= V4mom!" uNimw �+iN�+eR4.lu 3 �o�nw m v�i gym.-iuic � `� w Ln N M N '° cc cJ y c` D u ur W u, !.� 9 Cm = !L ur a B In jo f �a] 06 m W N N L6 rti CO l!l Q! D W N F d w L, I . 13,ilN = V? n w R�/1 .T. Y1 CO !� QF Y