HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-11-06-minutes-joint-meeting-with-lincoln-&-grant-county-Open Record Public Meeting
Washington State Association of Counties WSAC — Regional / Local Legislative Briefing with
Lincoln and Kittitas Counties and State Legislators for the 12th and 13th Districts
November 6, 2019
1:00 P.M.
In attendance:
Grant County:
Tom Taylor, Chair
Cindy Carter, Vice -Chair
Richard Stevens, Member
Lincoln County:
Mark Stedman
Rob Coffinan
Kittitas County:
Cory Wright
Brett Wachsmith
Laura Osiadacz
Judy Warnick, Senator
Tom Dent, Representative
Alex Ybarra, Representative
Suzi Fode, Director, New Hope
Paul Jewel, WSAC
1:00 p.m. Commissioners from Grant, Lincoln, and Kittitas Counties, WSAC staff, and 12th and
13th District Legislators met to discuss the following 2020 Legislative Session priorities:
1. Trial Court Public Defense
2. Fish Passage Barrier Removal
3. Behavioral Health
4. New Unfunded Mandates
WASHINGTON
STATE ASSOCIATION
o/ COUNTIES
Counties are responsible for providing essential services to every resident in the State of Washington. Yet, in a time of economic
prosperity and population growth, counties are faced with budget shortfalls that are leaving critical investments in criminal
justice, public health, and infrastructure at risk. Enacting the Washington State Association of Counties'2020 legislative priorities
will provide needed relief to county budgets and invest in the services counties provide to all Washingtonians.
"Given the existing low level of state
funding and the increased costs identified
to date, the State should increase the
funding levels to cities and counties for
public defense."
Funding for Trial
Court Public
Defense
Access to a defense attorney in criminal
matters is a fundamental constitutional right
that the Legislature passed on to counties.
Yet, the state funds less than 4% of the cost
for these services. Counties currently spend
approximately $156 million annually with the
state providing only $6 million.
For equal access to justice, the
Legislature must fund the full cost of
trial court public defense services.
��. Fish Passage
Barrier Removal
Counties support legislation that will
provide adequate funding to remove fish
barriers for all jurisdictions across the
state, including a long-term commitment
to remove priority fish barriers - not just
respond to the state's obligations under the
culverts decision.
The Legislature must provide funding
to remove fish barriers at the state
and local level as well as the necessary
tools to meet the 2030 mandate.
Behavioral Health
Washington State is changing how it pays for delivery
of physical health services, mental health services and
substance use disorder services, choosing to treat the
whole person - mind and body - to more effectively
achieve better health outcomes and lower costs. While
the Legislature has taken significant steps to strengthen
and improve the current behavioral health system,
counties, as partners in delivery of these services,
continue to be concerned about gaps in services and
adequate funding to support county responsibilities. As
the state proceeds with behavioral health integration,
the Legislature must fund a complete behavioral health
system and ensure that counties receive the funds
necessary to provide quality care.,3_ —
Ensure Washington State provides an adequately
funded comprehensive behavioral health system.
Oppose New
Unfunded Mandates
The Legislature has continued to shift costs through
policy changes without addressing the underlying
funding problems that face county budgets.
Counties have been diverting funds from road
maintenance, reducing investments in infrastructure,
and leaving critical public safety positions unfilled to
meet the obligations the state keeps piling on.
Counties believe that the legislature must comply
with state law (RCW 43.135.060) that PROHIBITS
the passage of any new programs or increasing
services levels to existing programs unless "fully
reimbursed by the state for the costs".
Counties oppose any legislation that will
increase costs for local government without
funding provided by the state.
0
WASHINGTON
STATE ASSOCIATION
o/ COUNTIES
Fish -Barriers: A Comprehensive Approach
In 2001, twenty-one Washington State Tribes filed suit in Federal District
Court seeking to compel the State of Washington to repair or replace
culverts that acted as barriers to fish migration.
Dissatisfied with the state's progress, the tribes sought and won a
permanent injunction in 2013 that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in
2018, forcing the state to replace all offending culverts under state-owned
roads in the case -area by 2030.
This case area includes an estimated 800 state-owned barriers within
fourteen counties surrounding Puget Sound.The state has estimated costs in
excess of $2 billion to address the 800+ barriers under state roads.
The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's (WDFW) inventory lists
over 3,200 known county -owned fish barriers in the case area, with an
estimated potential for 10,000 county owned barriers statewide. The cost
to replace county -owned barriers in the 14 -county case area is currently
estimated at $7.7 billion.
No counties posses resources to address a problem of this magnitude. On
average, counties can afford to upgrade 2-4 barriers per year.
What Counties Need:
Counties support
a coordinated
approach to fish
passage barrier
removal.
Now is the time to develop
a coordinated program
that removes state, local,
and private barriers that
completely open habitat
throughout a watershed.
• Adequate funding and a long-term
commitment from the state to remove county -
owned fish barriers;
• A reduction of elimination of project match
requirements;
• Funding for the monitoring & maintenance of
passable culverts, continued efforts to identify
& inventory new barriers;
• Streamlining project permitting; and
• Tools that assist in speeding up project
delivery.
WASHINGTON
STATE ASSOCIATION
What is an 'Unfunded Mandate"?
Counties play anessential role in keeping Washington
residents safe and secure bypreserving public
health and vveU'being. protecting public safety, and
safeguarding the civil and criminal justice system.
Washington's counties are committed to working with
the Legislature tofind a way to serve all the residents of
the state.
County revenues are simply not keeping pace with
the cost ofnormal inflation and population growth. |n
comparison with cities and the state, county revenue
growth lags significantly behind.
The state continues topass legislation that increases costs for counties,
UNFUNKU����KU��������
DED
refuses toadequately fund the constitutiunaUyand statutorily required
countyservices.andaUovvsstateagenciestoadnptcosL|yregu|ations.or
MANDATE
avoid paying their fair share.
REFORM
[munties, asagents ofWashington state, are tasked with implementing
laws and court mandates onbehalf ofthe state ofWashington. Therefore,
the Legislature must ensure that counties have adequate resources to
perform these constitutional and statutory responsibilities.
c� vVas�.'���o..��a�e
�t
Examples ofunfunded mandates from the Legislature are:
Trial Court Public Defense . Election Costs
Building and Servicing Ballot Drop Boxes . Court Costs
Public Health Services ^ Public Safety Regulations
r.�
The Washington State Legislature has continued toshift costs through
policy changes without addressing the underlying funding problems that
-
face county budgets. However, hisnot only the Legislature that shifts
costs down tocounties. Other state agencies and the courts changing
rules, regulations and internal policies affect county budget's bottom line.