HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes-2018-160 Task Order 16BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2018 _/bO
AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON KPFF TASK ORDER NO. 16 FOR
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING AND
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
WHEREAS: KPFF was selected from a competitive selection process in 2017 as a structural
engineering service provider; and
WHEREAS: The United States Forest Service recently load rated the Big Boulder Creek
Bridge for a failing bridge abutment; and
WHEREAS: The bridge is located on Fish Lake Road and serves County residents; and
WHEREAS: Public Works has recently placed the Big Boulder Creek Bridge on the annual
construction program for 2019; and
WHEREAS: Replacement of the failing bridge is a high priority for the United States Forest
Service who is maintaining Fish Lake Road for the County on a maintenance
agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the
best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's signature on KPFF Task Order No.
16 for engineering and construction support services replacing Big Boulder Creek Bridge.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that cost ofKPFF Task Order is set at $173,000.
DATED this 2nd day of October, 2018, at Ellensburg, Washington.
Attest:
_,Z(clerk of the Board-Julie Kjorsvik
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Obie O'Brien, Vice-Chairman
Cory Wright, Commissioner
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Formal Task Order Document
KPFF
Task Order Number 016
Maximum Amount Payable $173,000 Completion Date 12/30/2019
The general provisions and clauses of Local Agency Agreement Number (KCPW 2017-
19ENG2) shall be in full force and effect for this Task Order.
Location of Project: Kittitas County
Project Title: Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement
Description of Work: KPFF will prepare the PS&E documents for the replacement of the Big
Boulder Creek Bridge in coordination with Kittitas County staff. The design team includes:
KPFF -Project Management and Structural Engineering
Hart Crowser -Geotechnical Engineering
Watershed Science and Engineering -Hydraulic Engineering
Jacobs -Environmental/Permitting
Tentative Project Advertisement is April 2019, but will be dependent on permitting, fish
windows, and bridge procurement schedules.
The existing timber bridge is located on Cle Elum Valley Road over Big Boulder Creek
approximately three miles north of the Salmon La Sac Campground. The bridge is currently
posted for a 5 Ton weight limit due to scour at the timber sill foundation. The County prefers to
replace the bridge with a single lane prefabricated superstructure.
TASKl PROJECT MANAGEMENT
KPFF will manage the development of the PLANS, SPECS & ENGINEERING COST
ESTIMATE (PS&E) in such a manner to ensure the County is able to achieve the desirable
bidding date. This effort will include appropriate in-house duties such as invoicing, contract
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
compliance assurance, file and staff organization, client communications ( emails and telephone),
and general project oversight. Project Management tasks include:
1.1 Project Team Management and Coordination
1.2 Monthly Progress Reports/Invoices (Assume 8)
1.3 Monthly Project Progress Meetings/Minutes (Assume 8 meetings, held via
teleconference)
1.4 Coordination with WDFW (Assume 8 hours)
1.5 Management Reserve -allocation of the reserve funds for additional out of scope
tasks based on written approval of the County
TASK2 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
KPFF shall perform the structural engineering analysis and design of the Big Boulder Creek
Bridge substructure. KPFF shall perform appropriate analysis and design calculations in
accordance with the most current edition (at the time ofNTP) of the WSDOT Bridge Design
Manual (BDM) and the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, and the Local Agency
Guidelines. Considering the location and use of the bridge, alternative criteria, such as Forest
Service guidelines, may be considered to reduce construction costs.
TASK 2.1 -Project Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit
A project kickoff meeting will be held at the existing bridge site .
TASK 2.2 -Alternative Analysis Memo
Brief memo to summarize site constraints, design criteria and preferred bridge structure
TASK 2.3 -Development of PS&E/Contract Bid Documents
TASK 2.31 -Plan and Calculation Preparation
• Project Cover Sheet
• General Notes and Quantities
• Bridge Layout -plan and elevation
• Structural notes
• Foundation Plan-Layout
• Foundation Design and Details
• Wingwall Layout/Details
TASK 2.32 -Structural Special Provisions
~TTIT.A.S COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
TASK 2.33 -Cost Estimate
TASK 2.34 -Deliverable preparation
TASK 2.40 -Quality Control Checks and Reviews
TASK 2.50 -Technical Collaboration
Structural design engineers will coordinate with survey, civil, geotechnical, hydraulics and
environmental engineers for project design and contract coordination.
TASK 2.60 -Construction Support
If needed to provide support during construction to respond to RFI's and review submittals.
TASK3 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
TASK 3.10 -Planning and Research
Hart Crowser will review readily available geologic maps and water well logs that cover the site
vicinity, and other reports and plans provided by others (if any) for general information
regarding subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and geologic hazards.
Hart Crowser will coordinate field explorations with KPFF, Kittitas County, USPS, drilling
subcontractors, and internal staff. If required, Hart Crowser will submit a traffic control plan for
review by the County.
TASK 3.20-Field Work
TASK 3.21-Site Reconnaissance and Utility Locates
Hart Crowser will conduct a reconnaissance to get familiarized with the site. Relevant
features will be noted, and the proposed exploration location marked for the utility
locators. Hart Crowser will notify "One-Call" service for public utility locates.
TASK 3.22 -Field Explorations
Hart Crowser will advance one boring near the south side of the bridge. (The north side
of the bridge cannot be accessed with drilling equipment due to load restrictions.) The
boring will be advanced using a TSi 1 S0CC Sonic Drill, which can typically penetrate
~ITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
through boulders and similar materials. The boring will be advanced until one of the
following criteria is reached: 1) the boring penetrates 10 feet into rock, 2) refusal occurs
within nested boulders, or 3) we reach a depth of 50 feet. If thick soil layers (sand, gravel,
etc.) are encountered, then occasional soil samples will be obtained by driving split-spoon
samplers in accordance with the standard penetration test (SPT) procedure (American
Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM] D 1586).
Hart Crowser will observe the exploration, log the subsurface conditions, collect
representative soil and rock samples, and transport the samples to the laboratory for
further visual evaluation and testing.
The borehole will be backfilled in accordance with Department of Ecology regulations.
The upper 1 foot of the borehole will be patched with gravel surfacing. Excess spoils
from the borehole will be spread on the ground adjacent to the borehole.
Ifrequired, Hart Crowser's subcontractors will provide traffic control services during
drilling.
TASK 3.23 -Sample Review and Laboratory Testing
Soil and rock samples obtained from the explorations will be visually classified in the
field by Hart Crowser and in Hart Crowser's geotechnical laboratory based on the
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM classification methods.
Hart Crowser will conduct a series of geotechnical laboratory tests on selected soil and
bedrock samples obtained from the explorations to evaluate the engineering and index
properties of the site soils. The specific tests conducted will depend upon actual
conditions encountered. For budgeting purposes, Hart Crowser has assumed the tests will
include up to eight moisture content determinations, one Atterberg limits determination,
three grain-size distribution tests, and one unconfined compressive test.
TASK 3.30 -Office Work
TASK 3.31 -Engineering Analysis and Consultations
Hart Crowser will conduct engineering analyses to evaluate seismic hazards, ground
settlement, abutment stability, foundation and retaining wall alternatives and design
parameters, and earthwork guidelines. Engineering analysis will be completed in general
conformance with appropriate Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) design manuals.
Hart Crowser will consult with the design team regarding their findings and foundation
alternatives.
:KITTITAS C<>U5TV
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
TASK 3.32 -Geotechnical Reporting
Hart Crowser will prepare a geotechnical report to document their findings and
recommendations. The geotechnical report will address design and construction issues,
including:
• Site and boring location plan(s);
• Description of subsurface soil, rock, and groundwater conditions;
• Site preparation and earthwork recommendations;
• Seismic hazards and WSDOT-based seismic design parameters;
• Temporary and permanent abutment foundation alternatives, design
recommendations, and stability;
• Retaining wall alternatives and design parameters; and
• Construction considerations.
A draft report will be provided to the design team for review and comments. A final
report will be prepared that addresses review comments from the design team.
TASK 3.33 -Project Management and Meetings
Hart Crowser will provide geotechnical project management and support services,
including coordinating staff and subcontractors and conducting telephone consultations
and email communications with the design team. Hart Crowser will attend up to one
meeting at KPFF's office.
TASK 3.40 -Construction Support
The geotechnical engineer will provide support during construction to respond to RFI's or
changes in field conditions.
TASK 4 HYDRAULIC DESIGN
Watershed Science & Engineering (WSE) will provide hydraulic engineering services for the Big
Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement Project in Kittitas County, Washington. WSE will lead the
hydraulic engineering portions of the project which will include completing the following tasks.
TASK 4.10 -Data Collection and Review
WSE will collect and review existing data and information needed to complete the hydraulic
investigation. Data will include but not be limited to topographic maps including LiDAR data,
~TTITA..S OOUN"T'Y
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
historical aerial photos, flood data, bridge maintenance records, and anecdotal information on
past flood events from County maintenance staff.
Assumptions:
• County will supply relevant data they possess
TASK 4.20 -Site Inspection
WSE will conduct a one-day field inspection to examine the crossing and Big Boulder Creek.
WSE will examine hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics, sediment transport, debris flow
potential, lateral erosion, and scour.
Assumptions:
• NTP is received in time to allow WSE to visit the site before snow fall.
TASK 4.30 -Channel Survey
WSE will survey up to eight cross sections and a longitudinal profile of the stream channel as
part of the site inspection task above. WSE will merge the stream channel data with the
County's survey to develop a single topographic base map required for the hydraulic
investigation.
Assumptions:
• County will or has collected detailed topographic data within the road right-of-way.
TASK 4.40 -Hydrology
WSE will use USGS regional regression equations to estimate annual instantaneous peak design
flow rates. The design event for flow and scour will be the 100-year flood and the check flood
for potential damage will be the 500-year event. The 500-year event is not the design event, it is
solely used to assess risk in-order to identify any remaining significant erosion or scour issues
that might need to be addressed in the design.
Assumptions:
• USGS regression equations will provide reasonable estimates for the 100-year and 500-
year annual instantaneous peak flows. If they do not, WSE will use alternative methods
to estimate the flows.
TASK 4.50 -Hydraulic Analysis
KITT:XTAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WSE will develop a simple HEC-RAS model of Big Boulder Creek in the vicinity of the bridge
crossing using topographic base map. The model will not be calibrated because observed
discharge/highwater marks are not available. Instead, WSE will use engineering judgment to
select and adjust model parameters. The model will be used to help size the bridge waterway, to
provide data required to evaluate lateral erosion and scour potential, and to develop
countermeasures.
TASK 4.60 -Channel Stability and Scour Assessment
WSE will determine if lateral erosion, local scour, ice, or debris flows pose a threat to the
proposed crossing. If they do, WSE will work with KPFF to address these hazards in the design.
Assumptions:
• These hazards will be addressed through modifications the structure itself (e.g. deeper
foundations, longer bridge, etc.) and not through design and installation of external
countermeasures (e.g. riprap). If countermeasures are required, the optional task at the
end of this scope will be completed.
TASK 4.70-WDFW and Permit Coordination
It is anticipated that WDFW personnel have an idea of the length of crossing they would like to
see at the site. WSE will work with WDFW personnel, the County, and Jacobs (the company
that will acquire the project permits) to collectively arrive at a bridge length that is acceptable to
all parties. An allowance is provided for WSE's lead engineer to participate in one meeting with
WDFW personnel in Ellensburg.
Assumptions:
• A reasonable bridge length will be agreed to that the County can afford to build.
TASK 4.80 -Hydraulic Design Report
WSE will prepare a hydraulic design report to summarize and document the results of the
investigation. It will include the recommended NBIS Scour Code rating for the new structure, a
code that the County will need for their records.
Assumptions:
• A draft of the report will be provided to the County and KPFF for review. Upon receipt
of comments, WSE will refine the report and submit a final version as a PDF.
TASK 4.90 -Meetings and Administration
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
An allowance is provided for WSE personnel to attend one meeting at KPFF's Seattle office to
discuss the design and one meeting in Ellensburg to meet with the County.
Assumptions:
• WSE will develop concept sketches of the countermeasures which will be provided to
KPFF. KPFF will prepare detailed plans to be incorporated into the project plan set.
• WSE will recommend specifications for the countermeasures.
• WSE has included a modest cost for this task in the accompanying cost estimate. This
estimate will be revisited and may need to be revised once the type and scale of
countermeasures required are identified.
• At this time it is assumed that scour and erosion protection countermeasures are not
necessary and have not been included in the fee
TASK 5 ENVIRONMENT AL/PERMITTING
The Jacobs team will deliver Environmental Documentation and Permitting in coordination with
KPFF and Kittitas County staff.
TASK 5.10 -Project Management
1. Project planning, team direction and coordination and ongoing client communication
2. Project Controls
a . Prepare monthly invoices and back-up, and monthly progress reports.
b. Monitoring and updating Environmental delivery schedule.
3. Deliverables
a. Monthly progress reports and invoices
TASK 5.20 -Agency Coordination
1. Agency Coordination
a. Coordinate with Kittitas County Public Works, Kittitas County Community and
Development Services, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Ecology,
US Army Corps of Engineers , and other agencies as needed.
b. Coordination items include impact analysis, permits required and timelines, and
facilitated review of project milestones as needed.
TASK 5.30-NEPA/SEPA Documentation
1. NEPA/SEP A Documentation
a. Research and prepare one (I) NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) form
b. Research and prepare one (1) SEP A Checklist and Draft DNS if needed
TASK 5.40 -Biological Assessment
1. Biological Assessment
~TTITAS OO""CTNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
a. Field Reviews
b. Prepare one (1) Biological Assessment, assumed to be formal consultation with
both Services.
c. Provide ongoing coordination with agencies throughout the review/approval
process.
TASK 5.50 -NHP A Section 106
1. NHPA Section 106 Evaluation
a. Develop Area of Potential Effects (APE) and coordinate with SHPO.
b. Evaluate cultural and historic resources within the project area of effect as per
Section 106 requirements .
TASK 5.60 -JARPA Package Preparation and Submittal
1. JARP A Preparation and Submittal
a. Populate and submit one (1) JARPA application package.
b. Coordination with federal and/or state agencies for the following permits:
1. Corps 404 permit, United States Army Corps of Engineers (Assumes
Nationwide Permit)
11. Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA), WA State Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
111. Ecology 401 permit review including development of TESC and SWPPP .
TASK 5. 70 -Local Permits or Approvals
1. Local Permits or Exemptions
a. Coordinate with Kittitas County CDS on SEP A, Shorelines, and Critical Areas
requirements .
TASK 5.80 -Biology Support During Construction (OPTIONAL)
I. Support services during construction, including worksite isolation support, fish salvage
and removal, planting or site stabilization guidance up to 40 hours. This task is not
subject to Assumption 1 a.
Assumptions:
• Coordination with FHW A or WSDOT Local Programs will not be required.
• The Biological Assessment that will be prepared will be "Likely to Adversely Affect" for
Bull Trout and Steelhead, and will require formal consultation with both USFWS and
NMFS.
• The US Army Corps of Engineers will issue a CWA Section 404 NWP 14. No individual
permit will be required.
• Section 106 will be determined as "May Affect", and will require SHPO concurrence
• The Department of Ecology will issue a Letter of Verification for CWA Section 402. No
individual permit will be required.
• No wetlands will be impacted by the project. This Scope does not include wetland
delineations or reporting.
KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
• No NPDES Permit will be required.
• SEP A will be exempt.
• If the level of effort and cost for permit or approval acquisition is higher than the budget
amount, Jacobs will coordinate with KPFF and the County to determine amendments as
needed.
• No mitigation planning is included in this scope of work.
:KITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT DELIVERABLES:
1. Alternatives Analysis Memo (Draft and Final)
2. 30% Plan Set (Permit set. 3 sheets estimated. Layout, Elevation, Cross-section,
structural notes, Cost Estimate)
3. 75% Plan Set (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, GSP run-list, 30% comment
resolution)
4. 100% Draft Plans (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, PDF of GSP's or run-list and
PSE files, pending final review by county, 75% comment resolution and complete
PS&E)
5. 100% Stamped and Signed Plans (Contract Documents -bid ready)
6 . Geotechnical report (Draft PDF and Final PDF+ 3 hard copies)
7. One (1) NEPA CE and ECS Form
8. One (1) NHPA Section 106 Compliance Memo
9. One (1) Biological Assessment (Formal Consultation)
10. One (1) SEPA Checklist (Unless Exempt)
11. One (1) JARPA package for delivery to USACE, WDFW, and WDOE
12. Local Agency correspondence for each permit, approval, or exemption
PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS:
1. COUNTY to provide KPFF with the project survey base map. County will collect
additional data as necessary as requested by KPFF. Contours shall be in at least 2
foot increments and shall preferably extend at least 200 feet to the north, south, east
and west of the proposed project limits to include all utilities, driveways, ditches,
ROW /property lines and other items which are reasonably likely to impact the bridge
layout and design.
2. COUNTY will provide Civil roadway and drainage design for the project.
3. KPFF to provide specifications related to the PS&E they develop (bridge portion
only).
4. New bridge is assumed to be designed for one 12 foot lane, and two 2 foot shoulders
and no sidewalks.
5. Bridge superstructure will have a 2% crown from the centerline of the roadway, or as
prescribed by COUNTY Civil roadway design.
6. There will be no drains on the bridge.
7. Bridge superstructure is assumed to be prefabricated and designed and supplied by
the Contractor during construction.
8. Load rating report will be provided by bridge superstructure supplier.
'K:IT'TITA& CO'Cnlllil"T'Y
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
9. COUNTY will prepare Division 1 and all Civil special provisions and assemble
special provision package and bid package.
Cost Breakdown: See Attached
Project Schedule: KPFF will provide a PDF of the plans for the 30%, 75%, and 100% design at
the dates shown below. For efficiency, the design will continue following milestone submittal
while the county performs review of the submitted plans. The COUNTY will endeavor to
complete and return to KPFF all comments as soon as possible following receipt of them, but in
no case more than 10 business days following the submittal date.
Milestone Milestone Delivery Date Description
30% November 2018 Permit set. 3 sheets estimated.
Layout, Elevation, Cross-section,
basic notes
75% January 2019 6-8 sheets, all items including
further development of the notes,
specs, and quantities.
100 % Draft March 2019 6-8 sheets, all items developed and
ready for construction, pending final
review by County. Complete PS&E.
100% Stamped and Signed April2019 Stamped and Signed Contract
Documents -bid ready.
Completion Date: December ,
Agency Signature:
Date: -------_....,.---r---------
Consultant Signature: D ate:
Cf /zc.-1 I S
I
Exhibit D-1
KPFF Consulting Engineers
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
Kittitas County On-Call Task Order #16:
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost
Fixed Fee (FF)
Classification
Principal
Project Manager
Technical Specialist
Structural Task Lead
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
CAD Technician
Project Coordinator
Intern
Admin
Reimbursables
Mileage
Airfare
Per Diem
Subcontract
(Blank)
Subtotal
136.25%
28.00%
Direct Hourly Total X Negotiated
Rate Hours Hourly Rate
$ 64.91 8.00 X $171.52
$ 45.29 104.00 X $119.68
$ 64.91 34 .00 X $171.52
$ 45.29 134.00 X $119.68
$ 43.27 120.00 X $114.34
$ 36.93 0.00 X $97.59
$ 46.04 144.00 X $121.66
$ 28.85 20.00 X $76.24
$ 22.00 0.00 X $58.14
$ 23.08 0.00 X $60.99
0.00 X $0 .00
0.00 X $0.00
0.00 X $0.00
Subtotal
(220 Miles x $0.545/mile)
(p;llowa nce)
(Hotel+ Meals@$#:## x # trips)
(Sub Name & Task)
(Allowance)
Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit E)
Management Reserve
IIGRAND TOTAL:
=
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
= $
$
$
$
Cost
1,372.20
12,446.60
5,831 .84
16,036.96
13,720.92
17,519.14
1,524.72
68,452.38
119.90
119.90
$88,160.24
$15,673
$172,405.7711
Exhibit E-1
Hart Cr,t>wser , Inc.
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost a24 .4S%
Fixed Fee (FF) 28.00%
Classification Direct Hourly Total X Negotiated
Rate Hours Hourly Rate
Senftttr Pnr-ui,i~i:11 $ 88 .8"6 0.00 X $313.20
PfincipaO '$ 74..3 8 21.00 X $262.16 !
Se n for A.-s:.so el$te· $ 62.22 0.00 X $219.30
Ass0•oiate 52 .63 0.00 X $185.50
Seni or P rtO'~ 4 3J'.() 0.00 X $154.03
Pt0j eet 36 .06 36.00 X $127.10
Seni or ltafi 32 .2:2 34.00 X $113.56
taf.f 2~.s o 0.00 X $93.40
Se rr1or Dr~fteif 32 .tl4 10.00 X $112.93
11il rafter 30 .2:3 0.00 X $106.55
Ftt,j~<if h ststa !'lt 29 .96 6.00 X $105.60
Subtotal
Reimbursables
Mil ~ge
Laboratoily lesting
D rilli ng 'Sub.
n aifl'e Otmtre i 5 111b.
B&O Ta ~ bf.I Slfbs
Subtotal
IIGRAND TOTAL:
= Cost
= $
= $ 5,505.35
= $
= $
= $
= $ 4,575.49
= $ 3,861.13
= $
= $ 1,129.28
= $
= $ 633.58
$ 15,704.84
$ 2 H3 .00
$ 1.no 0 .. or:t
$ 4,5.mt oo
$, 2 ,soct.O0
$ 105.@0
$ 8,423.00
$24,127.8411
Exhibit E-1
Watershed Science & Engineering
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost
Fixed Fee (FF)
Classification
Principal --·
Senior Engineer 1
Junior Engineer
Contract Administrator
Reimbursables
Mileage
Airfare
Per Diem
Subcontract
(Blank)
-·
Subtotal
IIGRAND TOTAL:
188.43%
28.00%
Direct Hourly Total X Negotiated
Rate Hours Hourly Rate
$ 67.31 68.00 X $212.99
$ 59.62 5.00 X $188.66
$ 30.77 83.00 X $97.37
$ 30.00 2.00 X $94.93
Subtotal
(400 Miles x $0.545/mile)
(Allowance)
(Hotel + Meals @ $#.## x # trips)
(Sub Name & Task)
= Cost
= $ 14,483.25
= $ 943.28
= $ 8,081.34
= $ 189.86
$ 23,697.73
$ 218.00
~ $
$
$ -----
$
$ 218.00
$23,915.7311
Exh ibit E-1
Jacobs Engineering
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost
Fixed Fee (FF)
Classification
Env. Group Lead
Env. Project Manager
Permit Lead
Sr. Cultural
Cultural Field Tech
Env. Engineer Jr
Biologist
Technical Editor
Administration
Reimbursables
Mileage
Airfare
Per Diem
Subcontract
(Blank)
Subtotal
IIG RAND TOTAL:
117.00%
28.00%
Direct Hourly Total X Negotiated
Rate Hours Hourly Rate
$ 66.15 49.00 X $162.07
$ 47 .83 58.00 X $117.18
$ 33.80 86.00 X $82.81
$ 76.13 2 .00 X $186 .52
$ 28.00 50.00 X $68.60
$ 33.63 10.00 X $82.39
$ 33.80 141.00 X $82.81
$ 45.55 9.00 X $111 .60
$ 25 .00 4.00 X $61 .25
Subtotal
(500 Miles x $0.545/mile)
(Allowance)
(Hotel+ Meals@ $144/day x 3days)
(Sub Name & Task)
(Allowance)
= Cost
= $ 7,941.31
= $ 6 ,796.64
= $ 7,121.66
= $ 373 .04
= $ 3,430.00
= $ 823 .94
= $ 11,676.21
= $ 1,004.38
= $ 245.00
$ 39,412.17
$ 272 .50
$
$ 432.00
$
$
$ 704.50
$40 ,116.6711
14,il-;,f,,,.:1010 -~~ .. ~,1•,---... ,
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE -..::.,.. '" .... ,~-e .._ C,Q I ~1 Adman REPLACEMENT ''"""I T•l"'
,_ _. r .. •--.,,,.,.,,.,,,.,.. """' ''"" m,n 0 -!LU I IUJ-1 ,., .. ffi-< "'"" ., .. .... .....,
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ••-~n ~ .. ' l ' ... , ...
I ~~~-~~ ' " f-! 4=-~ .. -t .
1~.........., .. \'G'W _ . -j-... ,
____J -,-I
lai11LII . .. . . . . . ~ . . . . • hl.U:.
IUt tc:
" .......,.
L ...snttcti.lffll..5.r ~Q"
~~~~e--. ( ... J ~ ·t l -I -~~ r -,~5 -
• I . ----™'L-,_ -f ~ D -cum ... :-t ,0 ' 1 ~~
2 ~ --i . ., ... -,-. . --i!-r -~ 7 ~ ..... ,_ f .~ 7 -t 2 -~-~. .. .._ ~r-~ _...,__ . ~ . i ~ I = ,_,_ I . . --LJ, ' --·•~l"l'i Iv.-;,""••·· 1 l . ' l ' I f trm -' . . ,20 . . ·j '"" 2so t'=::::;.1f~r ~Q~ I l " I • I 14,332 , ... ~-~"'1"-....... , ............ . . '"' . =-1 --·-. " " "' w . ~ . . . ' . . -~~~
~~~Ji;L JJll1ilffEEPitnQ 0
'---' ----. r ,.. ,_ J . ·~ --c---t~ ,~ _, -t-1.# ..... -m _,~~ -,--. -iJ• c..=;..;;-, -----,_ ... .: " .;----...
"' .....,
' _7 , . .c.' .,,... l tJ-~-~ I j i -----t--' --. . . . . . . . . . . M
~~ --' I Yfifi.ftiJUe= 1:Ut:1Nl'F"1J(0
~~ ' I ' I I ~ --' --· 0 --
' ~ r .,.. ... ' :.... ....t-F-=t--_-t-F-t ' .... ---. .,. ~.-mi:Wl:d ---·, -
'"' [1,;;..;iii ~ft.lM
kpff Page5or12
~l,.__2j>II ,, ... ~ . .,.._.. -BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE
,_
r .. u.ul S~u,~1 p,._.._. "'""' C,D ,., , ,I -I Mrno I R EPLACEMENT --1 .. . Tu klu cl .,.._. ·-' ~ Coord .-i -""""'"' nm, llll.U. Jm.fI f><u ,mu ,.,,.. ,uu. ..... l"ll\l .... I .... .... "-"' .... l,Uiio,l~,1 •~:=-,--. .., I I ' ' I I -..,
~
L8DOl~UDT01& . ' ' . ' . ' ' . ' . ' .. -ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & -. . ~ r I i I ,~ ...-----------I
u, ..... ~ ... .:~ .. -I· I .. -. ... ·---:. t--+---.-, . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... r.~
UttorCwm; • , .. .,. ,,. 1~.!...L ,, , .. "' • ,, • • • S684152 I
H•1"".,.•1a'ltt,t,_.hiift ". "71,.,Cfi" =..,,. II
kpff Page6or12
8utonilol!a:<iA
, __ ,,,_
"' SIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE -... ,._ I SO®, Proi .it .. ... . .. I·-Drahr ~::~ REPLACEMENT p , ... ---A.uDCoal" Prottct ""'' -~o~.-""" "'"' .,..., . lib.fl! 1q.&..1.l u:.&~ 01UI ...... U IJ:N, SI06M .,,. ..
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ... r-,_, -!.l'L~~~ ....... ~,.... -t . ·t L t ~' __!!._~uw ~ -·~r-~~ --,-. . . . . . u
'•
f.NI.IUDIM~
?:!! ·~~ -r -, .. I· i ,. ~au~ ,,, ' -. --·II':'--t ' -•-~---l ~-+ :! --~ --, I l-
TI1 ' -,.,, , .. ~~-----·-"! -:==t= ~ , .. . -'·" I"' ... (Siner, CN'il, Geolecholcal, _,,,
UJ ~ ..... N r ~ .. , .......... --
I . . . . . . ' . . . ..
'"
~IJCOTE~~DIO~Jf;Pma
.--,, ~-~ ~-·--l
,,~ -· ,--i· ~ Tu. 1,..:~--..wij~ ' -.-·:---D&r --.-· ·I· --,--,-,----,--,-lf' .. --i:,,r .-..o-.-a,.1:-. • " ' ' , . ' _,_,_ ' ' ! -;-,, • -1~ I -----
• I . It . . . .. .. . y u u.u.
·rr·--. ~ -,.,,,
• M IORA\A.IC:DiOIUEIEf'UJ 0 ._., ::•~ I iE -t-: . -. ' ---,_,__ ·-'"..,....,. .....
kpff Page7of12
1~•1~>1.IOUI ff,,-. ..,
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE ,._
•Mo I I Sen kll PrDjo ol Seni<,rSIIIII ... I ~: I ,. . ., ·-REPLACEMENT Princlial Ai,....,ia!a A1-1ai. AffiU!l"I .... ' ---"'tllut ,,.,,. fll!."l-1 1 ~ mm 1177-" mu< ,.._ .. 111)11 ..... ... ' ·-._,.
I ---
' ...... . . . . . . ' . . . "
• a:HYl:tt0 ,_ .. ,_,,_.,.,.,.u.r,.;, .. 1.,a
PEPf.NTrlNQ
E .t ;. i-~= ---... + t +-----. ' . -• N _.,.,._
r
--+ ...... ,_......., . . ' . . ' • . . ..
i.UOl'liurw; '. .. • •· • " u • •• • • H J;rtl
R•ltftliilrt~~! HA.U
•. 'l'.l•••.1:1c
kpff Pag,eor 12
M11t1111!k l-'.t91J ~---.. ,__... ,.'A"C
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE -' E~~--~EPLACEMENT E~•, ... ... .. _
Ull..1,1: ur,r bln
1 PROJECT MANAGl!!M!NT
,u ~~
_I._!! ~~·•,,;~,i;.:.:... :: ~~ ~-___,J. -........ ) • . .
<
i ...sct:Jmcru,r.JL
;:l ir,-e ,..,, ·;i:-----~:,z--::..
u, -----~
o--.c ....... o.--.._ ---~~-,,.--
-{~~ I•• --
-'fi ._ -
z->: -'" -·-:,, t.'~~~!Z_!: ... \\,tr:im..1'W,.,aM -t· --~"""!'!"~
250 I~,._.. ~.!!oney,C,;11,Geolvch .... ,u ~1U11Wt•hft,o,t.,.,.,.~.a,)' .. _.. . ---·-' --. . . . ..
-1t-=t---
t--. . . ' D . ...,,,._ --~ . -. ii;., -, . .... • . Mil' -. ' ... u •:: .. .. -.,,..
n . .., ..
" . .. .. .. ,,_
kpff Pa;•9ol12
lkM lft nietli'l,,,~!I ...._.ti .... .._.~~~ -~IG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE ,_ -Conlt!Kl
EPLACEMENT ' ' Er19,nur .__,.._
-, mcn niW=iill!li. ,,..,.. tJ1 •J;& ...,, ..... ... --,. • • 0-•l ••• --+ ---
.0 ~
1 111 ... IJI ,. • " . """' "i r,/
' ="iT.i.i.~:A'llc.!ffi,
o:u ' ~~-r
~=f\{c~ " --+:-~~c:!' ..... aM ~
I
.,. .... !~!!ft!!~~~ I -
I
"""''""""" ' . . . " ....
U'lliUliltffl' .. ' u ' W.HI
,u,nu,Oi iin.1111 l aruil 'HUI
illt •j
kpff PE1ge1oor12
! ...... 1"'6..~0ill -Lqn.-,: .,:
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE Env Group Env. Pro ~ .._0 -1 O ~ t~:-f E,o. ' 1-:-1 REPLACEMENT Lvad M T&eh E .
-T ..,.., .. "°" JIILl!I. :UIUI ,,,.,... 1111:U::t IILU I Ill.JI. .,..., tUU-1 """I
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT •• ,.--~--~
!!L~lltfl1 ..... -.~~·~
.!,!!.~•~ + .. ·-~.-.~,
11w-tld1 • • ' . ' . .. -.
' 5 TKtl"C'T'O"flll'.AL ENGJNEEftlN'G' :=w~~ --t :t " I "' . • w:~ -'-
1..11 'ffan ... ~ -
CS.ff~ . ·--.
1 ............. 1"'---t ;,
~~-l.~
.. ~~;-~ ->--• ---r-I ..
"' ~h)...,lllllil'7111......,_ ---:catl_.. .
U •1 ~~~ .. 1:11t.N!!t11 ~"l~_::::-,,..,.
l5'l ]~e=~~urvey,Civ1l,Goolechnicel, t .. t -i
,., ·ff•lflltl'rL ......... -.JM ..... . . --"' . . . . . , . , ..
~ '""
..-..-0£?Tffm.~ra~l OJittflllliO
~~-~ -~ ~ -~~, ;i;;;:: ... ._.,....,--·i--· ---+ --:t-tr~· ~~~~Tu.-. ;
'" .........
"' " --~~!!!.!'~--I ,..· ~ .... ~ --. . . . . . . . . " --' tffDRAlJL.lCcNGJNEERmTj -~-.i. l --1: -.. • -. --' ' . -• -
kpff Page11 or12
lll•tlft.ft91:t'~~II ("1,,--.+1"" ,.
~IG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE E~-~:-.-~w ,,_, ...... f Sr. CuNur;;il ~1:~•• , .. ·-,,.,.~,1-:-
EPLACEMENT El\lll"lffJ Ed~o t
._ """'"'-...... .u1u· .,,._,. man --""" 111 ' l lll.Ja .,.., . ., " ·-... ; ~ -~ ---+
\.M.lil"llillffll~ . . . . ' . . . ' "· --· . . . ""' . -~ • ·:=t L_ • "-'" . .. ... ---Cit -"· -• -:+"-Ir.In
fu A.._.ii.)i, ..... _,....,.. ' . > -~ i -.-n I -1 -.,. ·-. . .. n EO .. ---. . ....,..
.. " .. ' ' .. . .. , . . "'"'' ""'
lillflT, •• i .. i .. • •• " I 141 f • S391307
q:•l~uo1'if 11,nr: ri«-
·I I
kpff P11ge12or12