HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutiontoapproveTO16KPFFKITTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 2, 2018
ACTION REQUESTED: Request to approve a Resolution authorizing Chair
Signature on KPFF Task Order No. 16, Big Boulder Creek
Bridge Replacement
BACKGROUND: In 2018, The United States Forest Service discovered a
damaged abutment on the wooden bridge at Big Boulder
Creek. Public Works received Title 1 funding from the
United States government during 2018 and anticipates
additional funding in 2019. The bridge is located on Fish
Lake Road and is maintained by the Forest Service.
Replacement of bridge is not likely without the Title 1
funding. The road is utilized by a handful of residents and
provides a recreation access to hikers in the summer and
snow mobiles in the winter. The Forest Service is anxious
to replace the structure in 2019. KPFF is an approved
structural consultant appearing on Public Works 2017
professional roster. The cost of design and construction
support service is $173,000.
INTERACTION: Public Works
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chair's signature on KPFF Task Order No.
16 for design and construction support services; Big
Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement.
HANDLING: Return one original to Public Works
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Task Order No. 16 with KPFF
LEAD STAFF: Mark R. Cook, Director
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2018 -
AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ON KPFF TASK ORDER NO. 16 FOR
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING AND
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
WHEREAS: KPFF was selected from a competitive selection process in 2017 as a structural
engineering service provider; and
WHEREAS: The United States Forest Service recently load rated the Big Boulder Creek
Bridge for a failing bridge abutment; and
WHEREAS: The bridge is located on Fish Lake Road and serves County residents; and
WHEREAS: Public Works has recently placed the Big Boulder Creek Bridge on the annual
construction program for 2019; and
WHEREAS: Replacement of the failing bridge is a high priority for the United States Forest
Service who is maintaining Fish Lake Road for the County on a maintenance
agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the
best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chair's signature on KPFF Task Order No.
16 for engineering and construction support services replacing Big Boulder Creek Bridge.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that cost of KPFF Task Order is set at $173,000.
DATED this 2nd day of October, 2018, at Ellensburg, Washington.
Attest:
❑ Clerk of the Board- Julie Kjorsvik
❑ Deputy Clerk of the Board- Mandy Buchholz
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Laura Osiadacz, Chairman
Obie O'Brien, Vice -Chairman
Cory Wright, Commissioner
����� '", KZTTITAiB COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
K17 TITAS W UFT}
Formal Task Order Document
KPFF
Task Order Number 016
Maximum Amount Payable $173,000 Completion Date 12/30/2019
The general provisions and clauses of Local Agency Agreement Number (KCPW 2017-
19ENG2) shall be in full force and effect for this Task Order.
Location of Project: Kittitas County
Project Title: Big Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement
Description of Work: KPFF will prepare the PS&E documents for the replacement of the Big
Boulder Creek Bridge in coordination with Kittitas County staff. The design team includes:
KPFF — Project Management and Structural Engineering
Hart Crowser — Geotechnical Engineering
Watershed Science and Engineering — Hydraulic Engineering
Jacobs — Environmental/Permitting
Tentative Project Advertisement is April 2019, but will be dependent on permitting, fish
windows, and bridge procurement schedules.
The existing timber bridge is located on Cle Elum Valley Road over Big Boulder Creek
approximately three miles north of the Salmon La Sac Campground. The bridge is currently
posted for a 5 Ton weight limit due to scour at the timber sill foundation. The County prefers to
replace the bridge with a single lane prefabricated superstructure.
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
KPFF will manage the development of the PLANS, SPECS & ENGINEERING COST
ESTIMATE (PS&E) in such a manner to ensure the County is able to achieve the desirable
bidding date. This effort will include appropriate in-house duties such as invoicing, contract
�SL�UF4 _.. l0 PIS,
�'� �-` KITTITgfS COTJNTY
W, pop
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MI I ITAS COU.\TV
compliance assurance, file and staff organization, client communications (emails and telephone),
and general project oversight. Project Management tasks include:
1.1 Project Team Management and Coordination
1.2 Monthly Progress Reports/Invoices (Assume 8)
1.3 Monthly Project Progress Meetings/Minutes (Assume 8 meetings, held via
teleconference)
1.4 Coordination with WDFW (Assume 8 hours)
1.5 Management Reserve - allocation of the reserve funds for additional out of scope
tasks based on written approval of the County
TASK 2 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
KPFF shall perform the structural engineering analysis and design of the Big Boulder Creek
Bridge substructure. KPFF shall perform appropriate analysis and design calculations in
accordance with the most current edition (at the time of NTP) of the WSDOT Bridge Design
Manual (BDM) and the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, and the Local Agency
Guidelines. Considering the location and use of the bridge, alternative criteria, such as Forest
Service guidelines, may be considered to reduce construction costs.
TASK 2.1 — Project Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit
A project kickoff meeting will be held at the existing bridge site.
TASK 2.2 — Alternative Analysis Memo
Brief memo to summarize site constraints, design criteria and preferred bridge structure
TASK 2.3 — Development of PS&E/Contract Bid Documents
TASK 2.31 — Plan and Calculation Preparation
• Project Cover Sheet
• General Notes and Quantities
• Bridge Layout - plan and elevation
• Structural notes
• Foundation Plan — Layout
• Foundation Design and Details
• Wingwall Layout/Details
TASK 2.32 — Structural Special Provisions
t GPSCA�l.S ... lO ]Nf'CO
KZTTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MTTITAS COUNTY
TASK 2.33 — Cost Estimate
TASK 2.34 — Deliverable preparation
TASK 2.40 — Quality Control Checks and Reviews
TASK 2.50 — Technical Collaboration
Structural design engineers will coordinate with survey, civil, geotechnical, hydraulics and
environmental engineers for project design and contract coordination.
TASK 2.60 — Construction Support
If needed to provide support during construction to respond to RFI's and review submittals.
TASK 3 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
TASK 3.10 — Planning and Research
Hart Crowser will review readily available geologic maps and water well logs that cover the site
vicinity, and other reports and plans provided by others (if any) for general information
regarding subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and geologic hazards.
Hart Crowser will coordinate field explorations with KPFF, Kittitas County, USFS, drilling
subcontractors, and internal staff. If required, Hart Crowser will submit a traffic control plan for
review by the County.
TASK 3.20 — Field Work
TASK 3.21 — Site Reconnaissance and Utility Locates
Hart Crowser will conduct a reconnaissance to get familiarized with the site. Relevant
features will be noted, and the proposed exploration location marked for the utility
locators. Hart Crowser will notify "One -Call" service for public utility locates.
TASK 3.22 — Field Explorations
Hart Crowser will advance one boring near the south side of the bridge. (The north side
of the bridge cannot be accessed with drilling equipment due to load restrictions.) The
boring will be advanced using a TSi 150CC Sonic Drill, which can typically penetrate
"r c"scnues _. io hn;
,��°"° `�9 KZTTITAiS C®ZJNTY
DEPARTMENT Of PUBLIC WORKS
M1 ]FASCOUN11
through boulders and similar materials. The boring will be advanced until one of the
following criteria is reached: I) the boring penetrates 10 feet into rock, 2) refusal occurs
within nested boulders, or 3) we reach a depth of 50 feet. If thick soil layers (sand, gravel,
etc.) are encountered, then occasional soil samples will be obtained by driving split -spoon
samplers in accordance with the standard penetration test (SPT) procedure (American
Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM] D 1586).
Hart Crowser will observe the exploration, log the subsurface conditions, collect
representative soil and rock samples, and transport the samples to the laboratory for
further visual evaluation and testing.
The borehole will be backfilled in accordance with Department of Ecology regulations.
The upper 1 foot of the borehole will be patched with gravel surfacing. Excess spoils
from the borehole will be spread on the ground adjacent to the borehole.
If required, Hart Crowser's subcontractors will provide traffic control services during
drilling.
TASK 3.23 — Sample Review and Laboratory Testing
Soil and rock samples obtained from the explorations will be visually classified in the
field by Hart Crowser and in Hart Crowser's geotechnical laboratory based on the
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM classification methods.
Hart Crowser will conduct a series of geotechnical laboratory tests on selected soil and
bedrock samples obtained from the explorations to evaluate the engineering and index
properties of the site soils. The specific tests conducted will depend upon actual
conditions encountered. For budgeting purposes, Hart Crowser has assumed the tests will
include up to eight moisture content determinations, one Atterberg limits determination,
three grain -size distribution tests, and one unconfined compressive test.
TASK 3.30 — Office Work
TASK 3.31 — Engineering Analysis and Consultations
Hart Crowser will conduct engineering analyses to evaluate seismic hazards, ground
settlement, abutment stability, foundation and retaining wall alternatives and design
parameters, and earthwork guidelines. Engineering analysis will be completed in general
conformance with appropriate Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) design manuals.
Hart Crowser will consult with the design team regarding their findings and foundation
alternatives.
°� ` KITTZTA6 COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
gTTITAS COUNTY
TASK 3.32 — Geotechnical Reporting
Hart Crowser will prepare a geotechnical report to document their findings and
recommendations. The geotechnical report will address design and construction issues,
including:
• Site and boring location plan(s);
• Description of subsurface soil, rock, and groundwater conditions;
• Site preparation and earthwork recommendations;
• Seismic hazards and WSDOT-based seismic design parameters;
• Temporary and permanent abutment foundation alternatives, design
recommendations, and stability;
• Retaining wall alternatives and design parameters; and
• Construction considerations.
A draft report will be provided to the design team for review and comments. A final
report will be prepared that addresses review comments from the design team.
TASK 3.33 — Project Management and Meetings
Hart Crowser will provide geotechnical project management and support services,
including coordinating staff and subcontractors and conducting telephone consultations
and email communications with the design team. Hart Crowser will attend up to one
meeting at KPFF's office.
TASK 3.40 — Construction Support
The geotechnical engineer will provide support during construction to respond to RFFs or
changes in field conditions.
TASK 4 HYDRAULIC DESIGN
Watershed Science & Engineering (WSE) will provide hydraulic engineering services for the Big
Boulder Creek Bridge Replacement Project in Kittitas County, Washington. WSE will lead the
hydraulic engineering portions of the project which will include completing the following tasks.
TASK 4.10 — Data Collection and Review
WSE will collect and review existing data and information needed to complete the hydraulic
investigation. Data will include but not be limited to topographic maps including LiDAR data,
"tiG,ors -,IDn
p°" '`v., KITTZTAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MMTAS COUNTY
historical aerial photos, flood data, bridge maintenance records, and anecdotal information on
past flood events from County maintenance staff.
Assumptions:
• County will supply relevant data they possess
TASK 4.20 — Site Inspection
WSE will conduct a one -day field inspection to examine the crossing and Big Boulder Creek.
WSE will examine hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics, sediment transport, debris flow
potential, lateral erosion, and scour.
Assumptions:
• NTP is received in time to allow WSE to visit the site before snow fall.
TASK 4.30 — Channel Survey
WSE will survey up to eight cross sections and a longitudinal profile of the stream channel as
part of the site inspection task above. WSE will merge the stream channel data with the
County's survey to develop a single topographic base map required for the hydraulic
investigation.
Assumptions:
• County will or has collected detailed topographic data within the road right-of-way.
TASK 4.40 — Hydrology
WSE will use USGS regional regression equations to estimate annual instantaneous peak design
flow rates. The design event for flow and scour will be the 100 -year flood and the check flood
for potential damage will be the 500 -year event. The 500 -year event is not the design event, it is
solely used to assess risk in -order to identify any remaining significant erosion or scour issues
that might need to be addressed in the design.
Assumptions:
• USGS regression equations will provide reasonable estimates for the 100 -year and 500 -
year annual instantaneous peak flows. If they do not, WSE will use alternative methods
to estimate the flows.
TASK 4.50 — Hydraulic Analysis
", HZTTITAS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
K1171TASCOUNII
WSE will develop a simple HEC -RAS model of Big Boulder Creek in the vicinity of the bridge
crossing using topographic base map. The model will not be calibrated because observed
discharge/highwater marks are not available. Instead, WSE will use engineering judgment to
select and adjust model parameters. The model will be used to help size the bridge waterway, to
provide data required to evaluate lateral erosion and scour potential, and to develop
countermeasures.
TASK 4.60 — Channel Stability and Scour Assessment
WSE will determine if lateral erosion, local scour, ice, or debris flows pose a threat to the
proposed crossing. If they do, WSE will work with KPFF to address these hazards in the design.
Assumptions:
• These hazards will be addressed through modifications the structure itself (e.g. deeper
foundations, longer bridge, etc.) and not through design and installation of external
countermeasures (e.g. riprap). If countermeasures are required, the optional task at the
end of this scope will be completed.
TASK 4.70 — WDFW and Permit Coordination
It is anticipated that WDFW personnel have an idea of the length of crossing they would like to
see at the site. WSE will work with WDFW personnel, the County, and Jacobs (the company
that will acquire the project permits) to collectively arrive at a bridge length that is acceptable to
all parties. An allowance is provided for WSE's lead engineer to participate in one meeting with
WDFW personnel in Ellensburg.
Assumptions:
• A reasonable bridge length will be agreed to that the County can afford to build.
TASK 4.80 — Hydraulic Design Report
WSE will prepare a hydraulic design report to summarize and document the results of the
investigation. It will include the recommended NBIS Scour Code rating for the new structure, a
code that the County will need for their records.
Assumptions:
• A draft of the report will be provided to the County and KPFF for review. Upon receipt
of comments, WSE will refine the report and submit a final version as a PDF.
TASK 4.90 — Meetings and Administration
c 5-11rs...10111012
°10111E
0c
Fe
KZTTITAB COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
KITTITAS COUNTY
An allowance is provided for WSE personnel to attend one meeting at KPFF's Seattle office to
discuss the design and one meeting in Ellensburg to meet with the County.
Assumptions:
• WSE will develop concept sketches of the countermeasures which will be provided to
KPFF. KPFF will prepare detailed plans to be incorporated into the project plan set.
• WSE will recommend specifications for the countermeasures.
• WSE has included a modest cost for this task in the accompanying cost estimate. This
estimate will be revisited and may need to be revised once the type and scale of
countermeasures required are identified.
• At this time it is assumed that scour and erosion protection countermeasures are not
necessary and have not been included in the fee
TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL/PERMITTING
The Jacobs team will deliver Environmental Documentation and Permitting in coordination with
KPFF and Kittitas County staff.
TASK 5.10 — Project Management
1. Project planning, team direction and coordination and ongoing client communication
2. Project Controls
a. Prepare monthly invoices and back-up, and monthly progress reports.
b. Monitoring and updating Environmental delivery schedule.
3. Deliverables
a. Monthly progress reports and invoices
TASK 5.20 — Agency Coordination
Agency Coordination
a. Coordinate with Kittitas County Public Works, Kittitas County Community and
Development Services, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Ecology,
US Army Corps of Engineers, and other agencies as needed.
b. Coordination items include impact analysis, permits required and timelines, and
facilitated review of project milestones as needed.
TASK 5.30 — NEPA/SEPA Documentation
1. NEPA/SEPA Documentation
a. Research and prepare one (1) NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) form
b. Research and prepare one (1) SEPA Checklist and Draft DNS if needed
TASK 5.40 — Biological Assessment
1. Biological Assessment
�11 . " � y9, KITTZTPiS COUNTY
p`e\
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
K11 T1 WUNTI'
a. Field Reviews
b. Prepare one (1) Biological Assessment, assumed to be formal consultation with
both Services.
c. Provide ongoing coordination with agencies throughout the review/approval
process.
TASK 5.50 — NHPA Section 106
NHPA Section 106 Evaluation
a. Develop Area of Potential Effects (APE) and coordinate with SHPO.
b. Evaluate cultural and historic resources within the project area of effect as per
Section 106 requirements.
TASK 5.60 — JARPA Package Preparation and Submittal
JARPA Preparation and Submittal
a. Populate and submit one (1) JARPA application package.
b. Coordination with federal and/or state agencies for the following permits:
i. Corps 404 permit, United States Army Corps of Engineers (Assumes
Nationwide Permit)
ii. Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA), WA State Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
iii. Ecology 401 permit review including development of TESC and SWPPP.
TASK 5.70 — Local Permits or Approvals
1. Local Permits or Exemptions
a. Coordinate with Kittitas County CDS on SEPA, Shorelines, and Critical Areas
requirements.
TASK 5.80 — Biology Support During Construction (OPTIONAL)
1. Support services during construction, including worksite isolation support, fish salvage
and removal, planting or site stabilization guidance up to 40 hours. This task is not
subject to Assumption la.
Assumptions:
• Coordination with FHWA or WSDOT Local Programs will not be required.
• The Biological Assessment that will be prepared will be "Likely to Adversely Affect' for
Bull Trout and Steelhead, and will require formal consultation with both USFWS and
NMFS.
• The US Army Corps of Engineers will issue a CWA Section 404 NWP 14. No individual
permit will be required.
• Section 106 will be determined as "May Affect', and will require SHPO concurrence
• The Department of Ecology will issue a Letter of Verification for CWA Section 402. No
individual permit will be required.
• No wetlands will be impacted by the project. This Scope does not include wetland
delineations or reporting.
cn5cnors... n'/He
���"'�'� n`°*e KZTTZTAS COUNTY
y
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MIT TTASCOUNTY
• No NPDES Permit will be required.
• SEPA will be exempt.
• If the level of effort and cost for permit or approval acquisition is higher than the budget
amount, Jacobs will coordinate with KPFF and the County to determine amendments as
needed.
• No mitigation planning is included in this scope of work.
'`�., KZTTITAIS COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
KITTITAS COUNTY
PROJECT DELIVERABLES:
1. Alternatives Analysis Memo (Draft and Final)
2. 30% Plan Set (Permit set. 3 sheets estimated. Layout, Elevation, Cross-section,
structural notes, Cost Estimate)
3. 75% Plan Set (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, GSP run -list, 30% comment
resolution)
4. 100% Draft Plans (6-8 sheets, updated cost estimate, PDF of GSP's or run -list and
PSE files, pending final review by county, 75% comment resolution and complete
PS&E)
5. 100% Stamped and Signed Plans (Contract Documents — bid ready)
6. Geotechnical report (Draft PDF and Final PDF + 3 hard copies)
7. One (1) NEPA CE and ECS Form
8. One (1) NHPA Section 106 Compliance Memo
9. One (1) Biological Assessment (Formal Consultation)
10. One (1) SEPA Checklist (Unless Exempt)
11. One (1) JARPA package for delivery to USACE, WDFW, and WDOE
12. Local Agency correspondence for each permit, approval, or exemption
PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS:
1. COUNTY to provide KPFF with the project survey base map. County will collect
additional data as necessary as requested by KPFF. Contours shall be in at least 2
foot increments and shall preferably extend at least 200 feet to the north, south, east
and west of the proposed project limits to include all utilities, driveways, ditches,
ROW/property lines and other items which are reasonably likely to impact the bridge
layout and design.
2. COUNTY will provide Civil roadway and drainage design for the project.
3. KPFF to provide specifications related to the PS&E they develop (bridge portion
only).
4. New bridge is assumed to be designed for one 12 foot lane, and two 2 foot shoulders
and no sidewalks.
5. Bridge superstructure will have a 2% crown from the centerline of the roadway, or as
prescribed by COUNTY Civil roadway design.
6. There will be no drains on the bridge.
7. Bridge superstructure is assumed to be prefabricated and designed and supplied by
the Contractor during construction.
8. Load rating report will be provided by bridge superstructure supplier.
KZTTZTAI3 COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
9. COUNTY will prepare Division 1 and all Civil special provisions and assemble
special provision package and bid package.
Cost Breakdown: See Attached
Project Schedule: KPFF will provide a PDF of the plans for the 30%, 75%, and 100% design at
the dates shown below. For efficiency, the design will continue following milestone submittal
while the county performs review of the submitted plans. The COUNTY will endeavor to
complete and return to KPFF all comments as soon as possible following receipt of them, but in
no case more than 10 business days following the submittal date.
Milestone
Milestone Delivery Date
Description
130%
November 2018
Permit set. 3 sheets estimated.
Layout, Elevation, Cross-section,
basic notes
75%
January 2019
6-8 sheets, all items including
further development of the notes,
specs, and quantities.
100 % Draft
March 2019
6-8 sheets, all items developed and
ready for construction, pending final
review by County. Complete PS&E.
100% Stamped and Signed
April 2019
Stamped and Signed Contract
Documents — bid ready.
Completion Date: December 30, 2019
Agency Signature:
Date:
Consultant Signature: — Date: ZG '
61�
tso Qbw� a ssec .1e
Exhibit D-1
KPFF Consulting Engineers
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
Kittitas County On -Call Task Order #16:
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost
136.25%
Fixed Fee (FF)
28.00%
Classification
Direct Hourly
Total
X
Negotiated
=
Cost
Rate
Hours
Hourly Rate
Principal
$ 64.91
8.00
X
$171.52
= $
1,372.20
Project Manager
$ 45.29
104.00
X
$119.68
= $
12,446.60
Technical Specialist
$ 64.91
34.00
X
$171.52
= $
5,831.84
Structural Task Lead
$ 45.29
134.00
X
$119.68
= $
16,036.96
Project Engineer
$ 43.27
120.00
X
$114.34
= $
13,720.92
Design Engineer
$ 36.93
0.00
X
$97.59 =
$
-
CAD Technician
$ 46.04
144.00
X
$121.66 =
$
17,519.14
Project Coordinator
$ 28.85
20.00
X
$76.24 =
$
1,524.72
Intern
$ 22.00
0.00
X
$58.14 =
$
-
Admin
$ 23.08
0.00
X
$60.99 =
$
0.00
X
$0.00 =
$
0.00
X
$0.00 =
$
0.00
X
$0.00 =
$
-
Subtotal
$
68,452.38
Reimbursables
Mileage
(220 Miles x $0.545/mile)
$
119.90
Airfare
(Allowance)
Per Diem
(Hotel + Meals @ $#.## x # trips)
Subcontract
(Sub Name & Task)
(Blank)
(Allowance)
Subtotal
$
119.90
Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit E)
Management Reserve
$88,160.24
$15,673
GRAND TOTAL: $172,405.77
Exhibit E-1
Hart Crowser, Inc.
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost
Fixed Fee (FF)
Classification
Senior Principal
Principal
Senior Associate
Associate
Senior Project
Project
Senior Staff
Staff
Senior Drafter
Drafter
Project Assistant
Reimbursables
Mileage
Laboratory Testing
Drilling Sub.
Traffic Control Sub.
B&O Tax on Subs
Subtotal
224.46%
28.00%
Direct Hourly
Total
Negotiated
Rate
Hours
X
Hourly Rate
_
Cost
$
88.86
0.00
X
$313.20
= $
$
74.38
21.00
X
$262.16
= $
5,505.35
$
62.22
0.00
X
$219.30
= $
$
52.63
0.00
X
$185.50
= $
$
43.70
0.00
X
$154.03 =
$
-
$
36.06
36.00
X
$127.10 =
$
4,575.49
$
32.22
34.00
X
$113.56 =
$
3,861.13
$
26.50
0.00
X
$93.40 =
$
-
$
32.04
10.00
X
$112.93 =
$
1,129.28
$
3C.23
0.00
X
$106.55 =
$
-
$
29.96
6.00
X
$105.60 =
$
633.58
Subtotal $ 15,704.84
(500 Miles x $0.545/mile)
Hart Crowser Laboratory - Task 2.3
Holt Services - Task 2.2
Northwest Barricade - I ask 2.2
1.5% of Holt and Northwest Barricade
$ 218.00
$ 1.100.0C
$ 4,500.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 105.00
$ 8,423.00
GRAND TOTAL: $24,127.84
Exhibit E-1
Watershed Science & Engineering
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost 188.43%
Fixed Fee (FF) 28.00%
Classification Direct Hourly
Rate
Principal $ 67.31
Senior Engineer 1 $ 59.62
Junior Engineer $ 30.77
Contract Administrator $ 30.00
Reimbursables
Mileage
Airfare
Per Diem
Subcontract
(Blank)
Subtotal
Total
Negotiated
X
-
Cost
Hours
Hourly Rate
68.00
X
$212.99
= $
14,483.25
5.00
X
$188.66
= $
943.28
83.00
X
$97.37
= $
8,081.34
2.00
X
$94.93
= $
189.86
Subtotal $ 23,697.73
(400 Miles x $0.545/mile)
(Allowance)
(Hotel + Meals @ $#.## x # trips)
(Sub Name & Task)
(Allowance)
$ 218.00
$ 218.00
GRAND TOTAL: $23,915.73
Exhibit E-1
Jacobs Engineering
Consultant Fee Summary
Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Overhead (OH) Cost
Fixed Fee (FF)
Classification
Env. Group Lead
Env. Project Manager
Permit Lead
Sr. Cultural
Cultural Field Tech
Env. Engineer Jr
Biologist
Technical Editor
Administration
Reimbursables
Mileage
Airfare
Per Diem
Subcontract
(Blank)
Subtotal
117.00%
28.00%
Direct Hourly
Rate
$ 66.15
$
47.83
$
33.80
$
76.13
$
28.00
$
33.63
$
33.80
$
45.55
$
25.00
Total Negotiated
Hours X Hourly Rate - Cost
49.00
X
$162.07
= $
7,941.31
58.00
X
$117.18
= $
6,796.64
86.00
X
$82.81
= $
7,121.66
2.00
X
$186.52
= $
373.04
50.00
X
$68.60
= $
3,430.00
10.00
X
$82.39
= $
823.94
141.00
X
$82.81
= $
11,676.21
9.00
X
$111.60
=
$
1,004.38
4.00
X
$61.25
=
$
245.00
Subtotal $ 39,412.17
(500 Miles x $0.545/mile)
(Allowance)
(Hotel + Meals @ $144/day x 3days)
(Sub Name & Task)
(Allowance)
$ 272.50
$ 432.00
$ 704.50
11GRAND TOTAL: $40.116.6711
1q3ff �.Idll
o�om0o�oo�
«�mW.w=.
EN
M
ME
--------------
EMIMMEMMIMMENEEMI
000�0000moo0
C..
1q3ff �.Idll
kpff �.se„
kmMwmpec.
-..
^n
........ ..
0000®
IExse:�rz!l!
kpff �.se„
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
m�
n
vm
iMµY.EMENt
.crops i®m WnpanmlaMCwgY.nian
'
wnW arvs
YCIYP<LENOINE[gY0
�.mMe
-.. -.
aryv ymn.cL vl
WnNsnMpnhW
Lm
..-
wnPOM.nx,,Wxt M.ueA
__ aumycon�idcMmvnOPnYm
'
vn @ury ,Lxhaen+nnm,
HpnaL- EnLna.�rnmm�nN
'
vn MFa xo,)unsew
NILOLEXOIXEENMO
mUW Wal
[v.WMum
_
sunµ Pwlowd Palin
"
µ.utlrvvNCmbNem
-
a pmt
NO
1M1M<IAlC E1pMEEPNO
v�mo,
W
np�win nsclgtlen PapMµ
"-
s��ame<
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
�•
'I'
o mmi
ENAAoocm�)anoxa
mruxvu
oat
xm
mxd(a:a.ylc,•wv.,....n
—
I
ai%N'Sn nu lxNim•p
•.mre_ rm.
Labor Su m:
_o_
o
__o __e_
_o_
o
• o • o
JO 1 1 lo_
so
515,)05
Reimburse ble 5u m:
_
�
EBA3I
1q)ff
kPff 1•w .„
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
PR
yw T"MMl9WMEr W q iwm W nagmml em uweeamn
MMM/ PrwrwbweH��®
Mµ vigMhWDa .nnwEne.ma
SI UOWR ENOMEERMO
NtleA�6��e5
MeveugNiremnPsdECamm
BNMumna
pMuw
M
_ d•gUuuia
psvMplw
—�
_ _ mwnryl%.R ami
Mn�lswe�v�� E4•NooAM1tl..
m�.au0
ywn pF1'c sumaiN, alcl n mMM
'[EOIE[NN ICK E NCIN EERINC
¢�pwNw r�Qaia. _
oaNgyraµ
Wu�uaona
mamgnanamwatmw
a xvrnwuc ENMNEERmc
430 C=-,
mm u•M..M+Ia wI�Mg
kPff 1•w .„
1q3ff
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE��
REPLACEMENT
ENN GY KDOCYMENi 11 q
m embT' Swro, CuiN CwuwVs Po�
�
Lwrsumyl-
Le0o.6um: 5 3
311,606
RelmEunage9um:
yt,y
1q3ff
kpff 1,11.11,
-
mmOEM
IN
o�oom
OEM
CC��CC�o:i
e �q,F_oos�000000
kpff 1,11.11,
BIG BOULDER CREEK BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
E- -.,,
I
PE0.NIIIH6a*u
IEPMEP� Munn _ _ _
epiq_iuln.n
z.m,s�m:
41
ae
se ss
z Ea sa i m P s
szzpn
aame.,.,cia�m:
-
nos
1• rsarz