HomeMy WebLinkAboutGrantDate: 03/01/2018
Jurisdiction: Kittitas County
Project Tile: Fuels Reduction
FINAL REPORT
Washington State
Hazard Mitigation Grants Program
Project or Planning Grant
Address: 411 Ruby Street, Suite 2 Ellensburg, WA 98925
Phone: 509-962-7000
Contract Number: E15-243 FEMA Award Number: PDMC-PJ-10-WA-2013-002
Grant Program: PDM Funding Source: EMS-2014-PC-0007
1. Project/Plan Start Date: 7/13/2013 2. Completion Date: 1/912018
3. Approved Project/Plan Costs: $ 333,255.56
4. Funds Expended to Date: $ 366,368.79
5. Cost overrun or underrun? Yes Amount: $ 33,113.23
6. Request for Final Reimbursement: $ 1,459.92
7. Problems or issues encountered andlor general comments:
Enter text
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief the mitigation project for the Mitigation grant
described above has been completed. All documents have been submitted, all work has been completed
(following all applicable local, State, and Federal laws and regulations), and all costs claimed are eligible in
accordance with the conditions of this grant. I certify that the attached A-19, State of Washington Invoice
Voucher reflects the final costs for this project and funds requested. ro
Date Signature of Applicant's Authorized Representative
Financial Tracking Summary Sheet Kittatas County
Defenesible Space-Wildfire Mitigation Project
Kittita s Fire Marshall's Office
411 Ruby St Suite 2
Ellensburg, WA 98925
POP Start Date: 7/13/2013
FUNDING SUMMARY
Total Funds Approved
Fed Sha re $
Loc al Share $
Total $
Budget Category Report
249,941 ,67
83 ,313.89
333,255.56
Jurisdiction : Kittitas Counly
Contract Description: Defensib le Space
EMD Contract: E15-243
FEMA Sub-Grant: PDMC-PJ-10-WA-2013-002
POP End Date: 1/912018
Cost Share
75 .0%
25 .0%
Charge Code-Federal: 733CJ
Project Code: 3913
Status: In Close Out
Total Funds Expended
Fed Share $ 242,927.44 66.31%
Local Share $ 123,441.35 33.69 %
Total $ 366 ,368 .79
Approved Budget Categories Approved Amount Expended Remaining (over)/under Current Request
Fuels Reducation & Mitigation Work $ 297,000.00 $ 331,565.32 $ (34,565.32) 111.64%
Project Management & Oversight $ 24,508 .86 $ 25,451.34 $ (942.48) 103.85%
Admin/Management Costs $ 6,420.60 $ 8,109.32 $ (1 ,688.72) 126.30%
Travel $ 522 .50 $ 605.48 $ (82.98) 115.88%
Homeowner Training & Outreach $ 2,853.60 $ 637.35 $ 2,216 .25 22 .33%
Pre-Award Costs $ 19,500 .00 $ $ 19,500.00 0.00 %
TOTALS $ 350 ,805 .56 $ 366 ,368 .81 $ (15,563 .25) 104.44%
Prepared by Tim Cook 1253-512-7072
Josh Hink
PDM 2013
HMA Sub-Grant
Fire Marshall
509-962-7000
josh .hi nk@co.kitti tas.wa.us rose-shriner@conservewa.net
Coordinator: Courtney Merwin
Total Funds Remaining
Fed Share $
Local Share $
Total $
CURRENT REQUEST
Date of Request
Date Received
Date to Finance
Amount of Warrant
Federal Share
Local Share
Comments:
$
$
$
7,014.23
(40,127.46)
(33,113 .23)
1/2212 018
1/26/2018
2115/2018
1,459.92
1,459 .92
212612018 Kittitas Financial Summary xJsx
Closeout Documentation Checklist for Wildfire Mitigation Projects
Jurisdiction : Kittitas County FEMA Award/Disaster #:
PDMC-PJ-10-WA-2013-002
Project: Fuels Reduction Grant Agreement #: E15-243
Project Contact: Rose Shriner
Property Qwner(s) Name(s): multiple
Property Address(es): multiple
Project Documentation
1. Letter requesting closeout wI:
a. Brief Narrative explaining success of project, any
problems/inconsistencies, and any important notes that should be
documented . verify Approve Scope of Work was completed and explain
any delineations and all expenses have been paid -Identify any
underruns.
b. SEE APPENDIX A
2. Final Financial Report
a . A Final Financial Table showing
-Approved Costs vs. Actual Costs
Program Income (if any)
Amount left to obligate/deobligate
All expenses paid were eligible and allocable to the sub-grantee award
as reconciled with the approved SF-424 budget
Final Financial Status Report
b. SEE APPENDIX B
3. Final Quarterly Report
a. SUBMITTED 1116/2018
4. Photographs of the project prior to project implementation and after project
implementation.
a. SEE APPENDIX A & C.
5. Copies of any compliance documentation required by the grant award (e.g., coastal
zone management consistency determination from Dept. of Ecology, 404 permits,
recorded deeds, etc).
a. This project did not require a consistency determination under the Coastal Zone
Management Act from State Department of Ecology. This project did not require
a 404 permit since scope of work did not include any practices that would impact
aquatics by Discharging, dredging, or placing fill within waters of the US. Includes
navigable waters, wetlands, lakes, rivers, streams, and tributaries . This project
also did not require recorded deeds at any time due to the parameters of the
scope of work.
6 . Documentation or report that all environmental and historical preservation conditions
of the grant award were compiled with as described in the Grant Agreement. May be a
narrative explaining how each EHP condition was met in accordance with all required
permits and applicable building codes as modified or protected by the approved project.
A blanket certification will not fulfill this requirement.
a. The target communities of this project area where defined in the Historical
Assessment process, and a FONSI was determined. The items identified in the
Kittitas County Wildfire Fuels Reduction Project Final Environmental Assessment
did not impact the project since all projects were located within each project
boundary. A potential impact of Hidden Valley had one structure located in the
project boundary, however, the nearest project occurred approximately three
miles from the noted location (geodesic distance). The Archeological resources
defined in the Assessment did not apply to the projects defined since projects did
not intersect Forest Practices Application and many project areas remained near
developed properties (Hidden Valley Rd and Hidden Valley Terrace Rd).
Although potential cultural resources sites were found within the Pine Loch Sun
development, on-site projects did not show any characteristics since the lots
were average 1 acre or less, and remained close to existing structures that were
constructed in the mid to late 20th century. Sky Meadows had no significant
cultural resource inventories, nor was any found during project vegetation
removal implementation. No structure alteration or impacts to existing structures
were made that would trigger any building permit or review of any kind. All project
implementation occured above ground with minimal disturbance around
perimeters of structures on the landscape and no permit review was required
from state or local jurisdictions. No trees were removed of (8) inches in diameter
at breast height or greater were removed within one hundred (100) feet of water
bodies with known presence of Endangered Species Act -listed fish species
including Cle ELum Lake, Teanaway River and Swauk Creek, concurrent with
item 0 of Scope of Work in E15-243 Kittitas County Wildfire Mitigation Fuels
Reduction Project. Also, listed in the Scope of Work in E15-243 Scope of Work,
item n, no vegetation management activities were allowed within (5) feet of a
streams Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)I and within fifteen (15) feet of the
OHWM, limbing and trimming was not allowed on trees greater than seven (7)
inches dbh that overhang the streams.
7. Treatment plans for each property
a. Treatment plans are listed with each individual project, which the individual
landowner signs. Treatment plans were designed to ensure consistency with
NRCS and/or DNR standards and specifications. See below for Scope of Work
Treatment Plan applied to each property:
CONTRACTOR
Complete a fuels reduction project according to the Specifications listed below.
SPECIFICA TlONS :
Prior to beginning this project, the Contractor will meet with the landowner to outline the
planned start date, operating schedule and order of project completion.
The contractor will provide the following services: The Contractor will supply a crew and
equipment necessary to conduct the fuels reduction operation. The Contractor will take
steps to prevent any unnecessary damage to adjacent timber, sailor water. The
Contractor will be responsible to preserve survey markers and will replace damaged
markers at their own expense using surveyors acceptable to the landowner. Contractor
will also be responsible for any private property damaged during the course of the
project. The Contractor shall perform the work listed in the following Prescription:
General Instructions Ribbon colors used to mark the fuel break are as follows: Pink =
Shaded fuel break boundary Yellow = 00 not cut
General prescrlpUon {ror fusls reduction project
1. Dead and down material up to 10 inches in diameter will be chipped and the chips
scattered over the work site. Coordinate with landowner to see if any should be left for
firewood.
2. The limbs of dead and down trees greater than 10 inches in diameter will be
removed and chipped and the remaining trunk will be left in place unless several trees
have created a piled concentration. In this case, the remaining tree trunks will be
separated by at least 10 feet from any other logs and left on site .
3. All vegetation stumps heights will be cut no higher than 2 inches above the
ground. All cuts will be a flat or parallel cut to the ground.
4. Standing dead trees with red needles still attached shall be felled and treated
using the dead and down prescription as required in item 1 and 2 above.
5. The Contractor will not cut any green trees from the premises that are greater than
a-inch diameter at breast height without prior approval from the Landowner.
6. Trees a inches and greater in diameter (DBH) will be pruned (live and dead limbs)
up to a height of 15 feet. Limbs will be pruned when branches are larger than 2 inches
diameter (regardless of length) or greater than 2 feet in length (regardless of diameter).
No pruning will be done to a height greater than 50% of total tree height. The cut limbs
will be chipped on site.
7. Trees less than 8 inches OBH will be spaced leaving 2 feet -5 feet between
crowns . Live and dead limbs will be pruned up to a height of 15 feet. Limbs will be
pruned when branches are larger than 2 inches diameter (regardless of length) or
greater than 2 feet in length (regardless of diameter). No pruning will be done to a
height greater than 50% of total tree height. The cut limbs and stems will be chipped on
site. Trees < 3 feet high do not require pruning.
8. Non-coniferous brush will be cut and chipped/mowed on site unless islands are
pre-designated or agreed to by the landowner.
9. Chips will be dispersed evenly across the site not to exceed a depth greater than
4 inches.
10. Cut stump heights will be made as close to the ground as possible, not to extend
more than 2 inches above closest terrain . Flat cuts will be made so that it does not
create a sharp stump . 11. Ground disturbance from machinery use shall not exceed
10% on each acre and berms, ruts and other operator caused ground disturbance will
be smoothed out to original contours before leaving the immediate work area.
Industrial Fire Precaution Levels (IFPL)
By law, WAONR uses two closure systems for reducing the risk of wildfires, one for the
personnel who work in the forest and one for the general public. Contractor will abide by
the IFPLs listed on the WAONR for personnel who work in the forest. Information on
the level for the day and the related requirements can be found on the ONR website or
by calling 1 800 527-3305.
8. Site specific handling of any Endangered Species, Migratory Bird Act and/or wetland
issues.
a. Each individual property was assessed prior to implementation for various
concerns. Most properties of Sky Meadows and Pine Loch Sun target
communities are located within nesting and roosting habitat of Northern Spotted
Owl, so no work was implemented during March 1st -July 31st to comply with
condition (p) of Scope of Work identified in E15-243 project. Since most work
could only occur in these target communities from August 1 st thru the fall work
season, each individual site was assessed for migratory nesting bird activity. It is
stated in the condition that if removal activities take place wi thin nesting season ,
a breeding survey be conducted and that vegetation removal should occur from
late summer to mid-winter. This standard guideline was followed. In most cases,
individual properties were assessed by a qualified professional for a breeding
bird survey, to plan for implementation, however, most individual projects were
moved outside of the migratory nesting bird window, but a survey was still
conducted to ensure due diligence. See Appendix 0 for individual bird surveys
conducted. Projects did not occur on wetland issues. Most projects were
conducted on steep slopes (above 20 % or greater) that are not as conducive to
wetland properties as low topography.
9. List of properties treated, with ownership, lot/block/subdivision , tax lot, and digitallat-Iong
coordinates for each structure with an accuracy of +-20 meters (64) feet.
a. See Appendix E
10 . Post-treatment photos of each property or group of properties, if small parcels .
a . This requirement is consistent with Checklist item #4. Please see attachment A & C.
11. Certificate of occupancy or equivalent documentation from the appropriate regulatory
authority for each structure to certify it is code-compliant.
a. No retrofits or construction related activities occurred to require this documentation. In
accordance to the FONSI only vegetation removal activities occurred within this project
agreement and were followed.
12. Copy of legally recorded Special Flood Hazard Area for property if located within a
designated SFHA.
a. Individual project sites were assessed individually and as stated in section 6 . A., of this
checklist, no approved scope of work activities occurred within the required buffers,
and/or flood plain that would trigger deviation from the approved scope of work and
approved best management practices.
13. Verification that NFIP policy is in place where required(required for all projects in SFHA).
a. Not applicable to this approved project scope of work and approved best management
practices.
Appendix A: Brief Narrative
Problemsllnconsistencies:
STAFFING: From the time this grant project was selected till even now we have run into
many obstacles, and inconsistencies given between grant administration staff and
leadership. Work inhibiting obstacles were March 1-August 31 restriction of migratory
birds, and March 31 -July 31 restriction for Northern Spotted Owl nesting and roosting
habitat, and Industrial Fire Protection Levels for the summer season. In the grant period,
the realistic work time frame for four of the project boundaries are fall only. Since the
grant was active, that has been equal to about six months at most. In combination with
the work restrictions and obstacles, FEMAlWashington State Department of Emergency
Management Division (WA EMD) and local agency turnover has impacted this project.
Kittitas County Conservation District (KCCD) has had two project contacts from WA
EMD, Brynne Walker and Courtney Merwin (she will be leaving at the end of March
2018). The frustration from having issues worked out with the previous contact, and
then to have the same questions/processes revisited, adjusted or repeated. Local
county turnover has occurred as well, Brenda Larsen, Kittitas Fire Marshal, left in April
2015 (who was the original applicant for the grant), Deputy Fire Marshal Josh Hink left
in March 2018, and Suzanne Wade, KCCD Wildfire Mitigation Fuels Reduction Project
Manager left in July 2016. Since that time , Rose Shriner has replaced Suzanne Wade
as KCCD staff, and there has been no replacement or re-hiring in the Kittitas County
Fire Marshal's office. KCCD has also had the financial manager, Sarah Leist leave in
January 2016, and was replaced by Miranda Nash at that time. Miranda Nash has been
providing financial support the remainder of the grant project period.
TIMELINE/ALLOWABLE WORK PERIOD: Per section q of the approved Scope of
Work, if work had to be done during March 1-August 31 st, a qualified bird professional
was sent to monitor pre-conditions and post conditions. Contractors were notified if site
conditions required site specific prescriptions by meeting the contractor prior to work
implementation on the project site. Please see Appendix D of for Migratory Bird
Breeding Survey reports conducted during this grant period. On the ground
implementation was followed by Attachment B Scope of Work, and buffers were kept
from OHWM. No work took place in the OHWM. Along the same lines of the allowable
work period, the confusion in the beginning of the grant (related to migratory bird
requirements among others), did not adequately allow for efficient project
implementation planning, since it took till mid 2015 to start implementing projects. An
extension was asked and approved in December 2016, to allow adequate time till
January 9, 2018, which helped the remainder five cost-share contracts be completed.
IMPLEMENTATION: Related to staffing inconsistencies have been implementation
tracking and monitoring that has been difficult. Since Rose Shriner was hired in August
2016, it is difficult to find where tracking tools where used from 2015-late summer 2016
from previous staff to Fire District Crew projects. The Fire District crew was laid off in
June 1, 2017, since we were unable to allocate new funding (the remainder of FEMA
funding was dedicated to finishing the Sky Meadows projects in Fall 2017), leaving the
District no options to continue defensible space and chipping programs through the Fire
District. Along the same lines, some pre and post photos are inconsistent due to
staffing. Other photo documentation inconsistencies are due to weather, project
scheduling and implementation. Four cost-share projects originally signed with Suzanne
Wade early in the grant period, where finally implemented in Fall 2017. Pre photos were
not found prior to implementation, and post-photos for some projects have not been
added yet due to snow conditions. Most of these developments have very steep, one
way ingress/egress, and it was best to wait till spring to follow thru with photo
documentation, since staff should not be put at risk for property damage to private and
district property (vehicles have been been stuck and/or slid off road endangering public
and private property). Alternative means of verifying with the homeowner and contractor
have been used to document the projects completeness. Most of these lots are fairly
small, which is fairly easy for verifying project completeness. The projects finished in the
fall 2017, finished a couple days before Thanksgiving , and we had snow on the ground .
The administrative workload of this project grant is infeasible for one person to complete
all items requested due to the amount of hours and time it takes to report, monitor and
implement this project grant. This one person staffing does not include the financial
support provided by Kittitas County Auditor's office and KCCD Financial Manager who
provided support during this time. The in-kind contribution reported by KCCD does not
accurately reflect the true cost of implementing this grant, since the application process
and close-out process are not eligible for reimbursement to the project grant.
Successes:
This project allowed the opportunity to build partnerships between the local fire districts
and its community, which has been proven invaluable in times of emergencies. The staff
from the fire district were able to be certified for their red-cards, which was extremely
helpful for the Fire District, to have staff out in the field already, and ready to respond to
fire starts, which happened often during 2015-2017 seasons. Opportunity continues to
grow, by partnering with the Fire Districts and finding local solutions to be efficient at
responding while reducing wildfire risk in the communities. Fire District crew was able to
gain familiarity of the community, and knowing the topography, have proven a
successful fringe benefit. The fringe benefits of this grant have been numerous,
collaborating with many agencies and professionals to build a network of dedicated
individuals to reducing wildfire risk in Kittitas County. Cost-share contracts have
amounted in approximately 70 acres of vegetation management and strategic shaded
fuel breaks, which are invaluable in times of emergency. Crew implementation have
empowered the community to take action on their own property, by limbing and piling
their own property, and the crew able to provide necessary equipment for chipping the
material. Having two mechanisms for implementation (providing financial assistance
thru cost-share agreements and/or equipment to chip material or create defensible
space) have been successful tools in implementing on-the-ground fuels reduction and
vegetation management for the target communities of Kittitas County of E15-243
Wildfire Mitigation Fuels Reduction Project Grant.
Name Address Target Community parcel # Acres Treated Lat Long Legal Description Project Type
ACRES 1.00 ,CD.667D-1-1: SEC~ 7: TWP.19: ROE 16:
PTN. !1:1t4 SW1I4 (PTN. PARCEL A-2 SURVEY 19/21-22);
Amadio , Lou 1311 Bufallo Sprir.gs Rd Sky Meado'M> 19-16-07030-<)015 47J48172 -120893704 (IMP. S I'IE,.MUST BE SOLD WITH 19-16-07030-0012) Cost-Share Contract
ACRES .29, PINE LOCH SUN II LOT 31 :
Avers, Don 12B1 Pine Loch Sun Or Pine Loch Sun 20-14-02051-0931 029 47_256982 -121048693 BLOCK I SEC 2; TWP 20; RGE 14 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 116. SKY MEADOWS #2; L0T27 SEC 16;
Ballard, Eslher 141 Tm Springs Rd Sky MeadoW!; 19-16-18053-0027 1,16 TWP_19; RGE 16 Cost·Share Contract
ACRES 5.72, CO 7758-4; SEC 33, TWP 20, RGE 17;
Benge, Darryl Hidden Valley Rd Hidden VaUey -Teanaway 20-17-33000-0014 47185399 -120.728947 PTN. NW1/4 (LOT 20, B26/P30) Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 566, CO 7756-1-1 ; SEC 33,
Coe, Bruce Hidden Valley Rd Hidden Vaney -Teanaway 20-17-33000-0016 4718414 -12072898 TWP.20. RGE 17; PTN NW1/4 (LOT 3D, 828/P30) Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 1 24, SKY MEADOWS #2
DeBoer, Brian 410 Two Springs Rd Sky Meiido'M> 19-16-1B053-0039 125 47139619 -120,882401 LOT 39 SEC 18; TWP. 19; RGE 16 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 3 03, CD . 7755-1-2; PTN NE1/4 SEC 32 & PTN
NW1/4 SEC 3380 TH TWP. 20, RGE. 17 (LOT 3A,
Forcier. Lance Hidden Valley Rd Hidden Valley -Teanaway 20-17-3200D-D020 47183051 -120728691 B261P44-45 & B31/P141) Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 26, PINE LOCH SUN #2 LOT 14
Gangle, Chns 981 Highland Loop Pine Loch Sun ~14-02051-1214 025 47253765 -121051004 BLOCK L SEC, 2; TWP. 20 : RGE. 14 COSl-Share Contract
ACRES 1 98 SKY MEADOWS #1 LOT 2
Ingertila, Denise 1011 Fawn Rd Sky Meadows 19-16-188052~102 1_96 47145644 -120888025 8LOCK A SEC 1B: TWP 19; RGE. 16 Cost·Share Contract
ACRES 4.95, CD _ 7755-1-1; PTN NE1/4 SEC 32 & PTN
NW1/4 SEC 33 BO TH TWP. 20, RGE 17 (PTN LOT 1A
Langendorf, Micahel 3955 Hidden Valley Rd Hldden VaNey -Teanaway 2O-17-32QOO-OO19 47184573 -120.730339 & ALl.. 2A. B26JP44-45 & B31JP141) Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 1.75, lAKEVIEW ACRES II; LOT 9: SEC 2:
2O-14-O2051~801 TWP 20; RGE. 14; ACRES 1.60, PINE LOCH SUN #2
Lucas, Randy 21 Loch Sun Point Rd Pine Loch Sun ,20·14-02057-0009 3 .35 47.259357 -121 052575 LOT 1 BLOCK H SEC 2; lWP 20; RGE.. 14 Cost·Share Contract
ACRES 3 02, CD . 7755-1-3: SEC 32, TWP 20 RGE 17;
PTN NE1/4 SEC_ 32 & PTN_ NW1/4 SEC 33 BOTH TWP 20,
Mabie . Craig Hidden Valley Rd Hidden Valley -Teana'NCIY 20-17-32000-0021 47164966 -120 ,731446 RGE .17 (LOT 4A, SURV_ B26/P44-45) Cost-Share Contract
20-16-26057-0004.
20-16-26057-0003,
2O-16-260S7..{)O()2, ACRES 3 13: NELSON CREEK SHORT PLAT OS.58,
Nelson Creek Construction WiehlRd Hidden Valley -Teana'NaY 20-16-26057-Q001 1326 47199502 -12O,B06033 LOT 1-4; SEC 26; TWP 20; RGE 16 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 350, CD 7755-1-4; SEC 32,
TWP~20, RGE 17: PTN. NE1/4 SEC, 32 & PTN NVl/1/4
SEC 33 80TH TWP . 20, RGE.. 17 (LOT 3B , SURV
Newton. Jodi Hidden VaUey Rd H:dden VaWey - T eanaway 20·17-32000-0022 2 47165034 -120.73038 B26/P44-45) Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 7 37, CO~ 7758-1; SEC 33, TWP 20. RGE 17;
PTN.. N'N 1/4 (LOT 10, B28/P30)
Parkinson, Steve 3959 Hidden Valley Rd Hidden Valley -Teanaway 20-17-33000-0011 S 471B6728 -120729263 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 61, SKY MEADOWS #4 LOT 16 SEC 17;
Polenske, Bruce 91 Corral Rd Sky Meadow-> 19-16-17050-0016 061 47145601 -120,658278 TWP. 19: RGE 16 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES .40, PINE LOCH SUN #2 LOT 3 BLOCK I
Popta'NSki, Joe 61 Bonnie View Dr Pine Loch Sun 20-14-02051-0903 047 47,260279 -121 ,05 1204 SEC 2; lWP 20; RGE 14 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 113 SKY MEADOWS #2 LOT 40 SEC 1B;
19-16-18053-0041. TWP 19; RGE, 16 ACRES 1 17, SKY MEADOWS #2 LOT
Reese, Scott 330/370 Two Springs Rd Sky Meado"M; 19-16-18053-0040 2,3 47139659 -120882898 41 SEC 18; TWP 19; RGE, 16 CosL-Share Contract
ACRES _43, PINE LOCH SUN II LOT 4:
Reuther, PoUy 71 Bonnie View Or Pine Loch Sun 20·14-02051-0904 043 47.260105 -121 o5B95 BLOCK I SEC, 2; TWP 20; RGE. 14 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 30, PINE LOCH SUN #2 LOT 7
Rupp, Christie 1111 Highland Loop Pine Loch Sun 20-14-02051-1207 o 2B 47,255367 -121 4 051249 BLOCK L SEC 2; TWP 20; RGE 14 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 39 , PINE LOCH SUN II LOT 7:
Staup, Greg 200 Sandstone Or Pine Loch Sun 20·14-02051-0807 037 47.258025 -121051919 BLOCK H SEC 2; TWP 20; RGE 14 Cost-Sl'lare Contract
ACRES 114, SKY MEADOWS #5 LOT 3
Sudduth, Brenda 210 Indian Hill Rd Sky MeadoOW$ 19-16-17051~103 114 47.142098 -120 B77789 BLOCK A SEC, 17; TWP 19: RGE 16 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 37 , PINE LOCH SUN #1 LOT 5: BLOCK F
Touhy. Mike 100 E Lakedale Or Pine Loch Sun 20-14-020~605 037 47.255586 -121056187 SEC 2; lWP .. 20; RGE 14 Cost-Share Contract
ACRES 754 59, CD 7469-2: SEC. 06, lWP 19. RGE. 17:
S1/2 N'N1/4 (PTN . PARCEL B-3, SURVEY
2281 Hidden Valley #551446 B18/P2D1-2031: (MUST BE SOLD WITH IMP.
Wildman, Ben Terrace Hiclden Valley -Teanaway 19-17-06000-0009 12.3 47169625 -120768234 SITE 19-17-06000-0013) Cost-Sl'Iare Contract
ACRES .40. PINE LOCH' SUN II LOT 4; BLOCK
Bruggermans, Earl 71 Highland Dr Pine Loch Sun 20·14-02051-1104 0.4 47,252625 -120050457 K SEC. 2; TWP. 20; RGE, 14 Crew
ACRES 51, SKY MEADOWS #6 LOT 28 SEC. 17:
Flemming, Ken 270 Gunther Loop Sky Meado'hS 19-16-17055-0028 0.5 47139825 -120.85815 TWP. 19: RGE 16 Crew
ACRES 34, PINE LOCH' SUN #1 LOT 4 BLOCK
Aveena. Cheryl 42 Lakeview Dr Pine Loch ~un 20-' 4-02050-0404 0.34 47.257891 -121053568 0 SEC, 2: TWP 20; RGE 14 Crew
ACRES .37, PINE LOCH' SUN #1 LOT
Coates, John 14 1 Lakeview Dr Pine Loch Suo 20-14-02050-0320 0.37 47258277 -121054177 20 BLOCK C SEC. 2; TWP, 20; RGE , 14 Crew
ACRES .49, PINE LOCH' SUN #1 LOT
Schofield, Eileen 143 Lakeview Dr Pine Loch Sun 20~ 14-02050-0321 0.49 47..256654 -120054319 21 BLOCK C SEC. 2; TWP. 20; RGE. 14 Crew
ACRES 1.00, BEACONSFIELD SHORT PLAT 93-07;
Chrys2I n thako po ulo us, PTN LOT 1 (IMPROV SITE. MUST 8E SOLO WITH
Georgios 1123 Hidden Valley Terral Hidden Valley -Teanaway 20-17-31051-0001 0.75 47181477 -120761557 PARCEL 959446) SEC . 31; TWP. 20; RGE, 17 Roving Chipper
ACRES .92, TEANAWAY WAGON WHEEL TWW198
Tappero, Michael 622 Wagon Wheel Hidden VaNey -Teanaway 21-15-260~73 0.5 LOT 73; BLOCK 6 SEC. 26; TWP. 21; RGE. IS;
ACRES 11.22. UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
CroYAey, Dawn 2271 Hidden Valley Rd Hidden Valey -T eanaway 20-17-32056-0003 0.75 47180627 -120,74436 SHORT PLAT 04-08, LOT 3 Roving Chipper
ACRES 3 OS; HIDDEN VALLEY ESTATES PLAT,
LOT 9; SEC 32, TWP 20, RGE 17 ACRES 3.04 ;
2O-17-320~& HIDDEN VALLEY ESTATES PLAT LOT 8; SEC 32 TWP
Peterson, Pamela HiddenVa~y Rd Hidden Valey -Teanaway 2O-17-32065..()()()9 0.5 47184594 -120.72877 20. RGE 17 Roving Chipper
ACRES 3 03; KITIITAS FOOTHILLS PLAT, LOT 6;
Sallteford. Matt 1251 Leo Ln Hidden Valley -Teanaway 20-17-32064-0006 0.5 47 .189117 -120J36269 SEC 32, TWP 20, RGE 17 Roving Chipper
ACRES 9JlO; SEC 26: TWP 20; RGE 16; PTN.
S1121PTN LOT C-2, SURVEY 11505156)ILESS IMPROV
Grinnell, Roy 1921 Teanaway Terrace F Hidden Valley-leanaway 2O-16-26000~O79 0.75 47.190514 -120803962 SITE. MUST BE SOLD WITH PARCEL 108136) Roving Chipper
ACRES 1077, UPLAND DEVELOPMENT SHORT PLAT
ANeIS. John 2111 Hidden Valey Rd Hidden Valley -Teanaway 21)..17-32Q56.0002 0.5 47.18085 -120,747Sn 04-08. LOT 2 Roving Chipper
ACRES 10.00, CO.#'6829-1-1-2-3; SEC. 26; TWP.
20; RGE. 16; PTN. 51/2
Bergstrom , Sten 1981 Teanaway Tef~ce F Hidden Valley -Teanaway 20-16-~041 0.5 47_190461 -120.804576 (LOT C-3, SURVEY #505156) Roving Chipper
Total Acres 73.66