The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRes-2017-101 Consulting EngineersBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF KITTITAS STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2017 _ / t!) / TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE ON FORMAL TASK ORDER DOCUMENT NUMBER 004 WITH KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS WHEREAS: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued a memo on November 15,2013 clarifying FHWA's position on the analysis of Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHV s) during bridge load ratings to comply with the requirements of the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS); and WHEREAS: Kittitas County Public Works coordinated efforts with KPFF on call Structural Engineering Consultants to identify bridges within our inventory that require SHV load ratings; and WHEREAS: FHW A established timelines to perform the associated load ratings resulting in Kittitas County Public Works having 48 bridges with load ratings to be completed by December 31, 2017 and 52 bridges to be completed by December 31 , 2022; and WHEREAS: Kittitas County Public Works negotiated Task Order Number 004 with KPFF Consulting Engineers to perform the required load rating efforts for the 48 bridges prior to the December 31, 2017 deadline to maintain compliance with NBIS; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, in the best interest of the public, does hereby authorize the Chairman's signature on Task Order Document Number 004 with KPFF Consulting Engineers, as attached. DATED on this 20th day of June, 2017, at Ellensburg, Washington. BOARD OF COUNTY OMMI · r N ER KI 'A UNTY, WASHINGTON ,Jj sia . 1 e-C hainn aJl ~~ Obie O 'Brien, Commissioner KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Formal Task Order Document (KPFF) Task Order Number 004 Maximum Amount Payable _....:.$_9_9't-2_5_9 _ Completion Date -------12/3112017 The general provisions and clauses of Local Agency Agreement Number (KCPW 2017- 19ENG2) shall be in full force and effect for this Task Order. Location of Project: All Kittitas County Bridges Project Title: SHY Load Ratings Description of Work: In accordance with FHWA direction for Load Rating of Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHV), Kittitas County is required by Federal and State mandates to update existing bridge load ratings records with SHV load ratings on the appropriate schedule. The Consultant in Task Order 3 reviewed the County's bridge inventory and identified which bridges require updated load ratings by 12/31/17 and which ones need updated load ratings by 12/31/2022 using the WSOOT Load Rating Flow Chart for Specialized Hauling Vehicles (Feb 2014). The Consultant concluded that the County has a total of 114 NBIS bridges which are longer than 20 feet and thus are required to have a documented load rating analysis or report on file . Forty-eight (48) of these bridges have been determined to require updated load ratings in 2017. Thirty-six ( 36) of these will receive an Administrative Load Rating and twelve (12) will be a Calculated Load Rating . A summary of the Task 3 effort is attached for reference. A Colculated Load Rating is a load rating analysis in which sufficient structural details regarding the primary superstructure components can be gleaned from either field measurements or historical documents, such as bridge plans or calculations, to support direct and accurate structural analysis and capacity determinations. The bridge's current condition is considered in the capacity reduction factor. Calculated load ratings will follow procedures in the WSOOT BOM and AASHTO MBE. Each bridge will receive a site visit by the Engineer to ensure the documented condition in the Inspection Report conforms to the condition today based on the opinion of the Load Rating Engineer. An Adm inistrative Load Rating is performed only on concrete bridges where design, shop, or as-built plans detailing the reinforcement do not exist . Steel and timber bridge structural components can be KITTITAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS field measured and thus accurately load rated using industry standard analytical procedures. The goal of an Administrative Load Rating is to provide the County with a Load Rating report for a bridge in which calculations cannot be performed without extensive research regarding the structural details of the bridge reinforcement and concrete strength. Since calculations cannot be performed, the engineer will rely on the material found addressing the bridge's history, including dates of construction, relevant design codes of that period, truck live load historical patterns of use, and level of distress as evaluated by the Consultant during the Site Visit. The Consultant will also review previous Bridge Inspection Reports, and repair/ retrofit records as made available to the Consultant by the County. The Consultant will, based on evaluation of the accumulated data, make a judgment regarding the capacity of the bridge to sustain current Legal Loads, the Notational Truck Load, and Specialized Hauling Vehicle Loads. Administrative Load Ratings will follow the procedures established in Section 5.02 C of the WSDOT Bridge Inspection Manual. These procedures are based on field evaluation and documented engineering judgment. A site visit will occur for each bridge to be load rated. This site visit is not an inspection; rather it is an opportunity for the Engineer to field verify conclusions from the last Bridge Inspection and to arrive at a consensus regarding how well the bridge has performed over the course of its service life. The Site visit evaluation will be performed by two licensed engineers who are also WSDOT Certified Bridge Inspectors with many years of design, load rating, and inspection experience. In general, rating factors for the SHV and AASHTO legal trucks will be determined by the ratio of moment demands of the legal trucks compared to the design truck or assumed design truck based on the historical documents. A signed Load Rating Summary sheet will be provided for each bridge along with a memo that will include photos, recent inspection report, calculations (if applicable). In addition:· • Assume all updates to WSBIS will be completed by County. • County to determine if any bridges shall be load rated for Emergency Vehicles and provide any additional truck axle configurations to be rated. Cost Breakdown: See attached. Agency Signature: fR J 2-0 } (1 Consultant Signature: Date: --~~~~=------------------------ 06/07/17 Kittitas County On·call CONSULTANT LINE ITEM COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET 2017 TlIskOrdar4 ITEM I 1.00 2.00 LOAD RATINGS TASK 4 SCOPE OF WORK Management Project Management Contract Compliance Client Communications General Management Subconsultant Coordination Travel : Ellensburg I SeaHle RT Assume 3 trips Administratfv'e LR Travel: Includes traveltime bet'ween bridges Calculated . Lff. Tf'l1cI mn"lllfe'S'foc CJJliiUJIJ Calculated· LR site assement Labor Subtotal: LOAD RATING -2017 ADMINISTRATIVE Bridges CulVerts UPDATE BRIDGES WITH SHV· CALCULATED Concrete Slab (88283) Concrete Channel (88082) Concrete and Pre·stressed (78041) Pre-stressed (88322, 9+2++, 16203) Corrugated Arch Culverts (78021, 79301,70141, 78112, 70091, 88261 Steel Pre·fab Girder (68161 -Big R) Timber 3.00 Labor Subtotal: Labor Sum: Management Reseve: 1I.,ffIb"" .... simc : I Average Per Bridge WroJec t Ellg) ~ c ~ 0 ... 0> t iii ~ to "0 'c .!! > ., .~ ~ "' (; . ~ '5 u 0: -. ~D!! iii ~o: 0 " C "0 3600 10 600 150 600 100 36 400 400 100 3200 100 48.00 100 3200 100 24,00 100 4000 100 3200 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS ENGINEERING ESTIMATED HOURS Project Technical Senior Design CAD Tech Manager (T SpeCialist (T Engineer (M Engineer (A (Staff) Whiteman) Whiteman) Frymoyer) Ashourj 6751 6751 4100 3427 3900 30 44.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 80 120 40 360 720 90 90 60 60 00 44-.0 99.0 19.0 0.0 360 1440 00 00 20 160 660 10 120 490 2.0 160 660 60 360 1500 10 100 410 00 00 00 0.0 44.00 KPFF Project ~NI"I'l1Ir IA MULTIPLIER Fernando) 2500 705"'541 1839.56 5291 54 40 82828 4.0 8664.93 3054 69 1406260 176993 117996 0.0 20067.18 2177535 797622 584920 797622 1834537 491665 00 6684101 400 9557311 1500.00 2186.20 99,259 Bridge No. 1. 89091 2 79144 3 80181 4 88282 5 98281 6 89022 7 60031 8 60042 9 60043 10 89041 11 87052 12 88061 n 79061 14. 78071 15 60083 16 60091 17 7101 18 89113 19 89123 20 89131 21 79132 22 87131 23 76131 24 79141 25 80171 2Ei 88201 27 88212 28 98262 29 98265 30 88272 Load Rating for Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHV) Kittitas County, WA Values from SHV flow chart to determine group· NRL 1 ,Shortest Span 200 ft Type 3 33 tons Type 3S2 47 tons Type 3-3 52 tons LRFR (All Types) 1.3 NRL Bridge LR? NRl 10. Name (YIN) No_ 08099500 Naneum Rd over Hiline Canal N 08174700 Denmark Road N 08231600 Cooke Canyon Rd N 08375800 Dry Cr , Connection over Flood Channel N 08382300 L GREEN CAN RD-HILINE CA N 07990200 Fairview Rd over Hiline Canal 08000800 Morrison Rd over Gravity Canal 08014800 Morrison Rd over Turbine Canal N 08014900 Ditchbank Rd over Turbine Canal N 08015100 Bar 14 Rd over Naneum Creek N 08031800 Taneum Rd over Hiline Spillway N 08040800 Howard Rd over Dry Creek N 08041500 Third Ave over Towne Ditch N 08058100 Cove Rd over Manastash Creek N 08077000 Kate n Rd over Turbine Canal N 08088700 Ross Rd over Turbine Canal N 08103700 liberty Rd over Swauk Creek N 08123300 Schebly Rd over Hiline Canal N 08141800 Schne bly Rd over Coleman Creek N 08152800 Cooke Rd over Hiline Canal N 08154200 Badger Pocket Rd over Parke Crk N 08162000 Thorp Hwy over Westside Ditch N 08163500 l\t1anastash Rd over Manastash Crk N 08178800 Tjossem Rd over Towne Ditch N 08214700 Colockum Rd over Hiline Canal N 08263000 McManamy Rd over Dry Creek N 08282100 Faust Rd over Towne Ditch N 08346900 Evan s Rd over Hiline Canal N 08348800 Church Rd over Hiline Canal N 08365200 Dry Creek Rd over Currier Creek N Shortest Total Longest Span Bridge Span Material length Length Length tt tt tt 23.38 46.8 43 42 concrete 75 24 concrete 53 19 concrete 48 46 concrete 43 41 concrete 24 40 38 concrete 48 46 concrete 24 47 24 concrete 32 44 26 concrete 53 51 concrete KPFF SHY Group Tota < 20 ft. Bridges in Group 1: 48 0 0 To be rated by December 2017 Bridges in Group 2: 52 0 To be rated by December 2022 Bridges in Group 3: I 14 N/A Does not need updated rating for NRL!SHV Bridges TBD : 0 Total Bridges: 114 ASR/LFR LRFR Legal Load Method of Operating Rating Factors Date of Last Load TDnnaEes Last Load Rating Type Type Type Type Type Type Rating 3 3SZ 3-3 3 3SZ 3-3 (ASR I LFR I tons tons tons . LRFR) 2003 ASRlLFR 25 36 48.6 2011 2011 2011 2011 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 I KPFF Group No_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Site Visitl Analysis Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fa ll 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Fall 2017 Summer 2017 Kittitas Co. to provide load rating information Notes Administrative Administrative Administrative Administrative Administrative Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Eva luation Non-Calculated Evaluation Non-Calculated Eva luation Non-Calculated Evaluation /'Ion-Calculated Eva luation ASR/LFR LRFR Legal Load Shortest Total Longest Method of Operating NRL Rating Factors Bridge LR? NRL Span Bridge Span Material Date of Last Load Tonnage~ KPFF Site Visit/ Length Length Length Last Load Rating Type Type Type Type Type Type Group Notes Rating 3 352 3·3 3 352 3·3 No. Analysis Bridge ID. Name (Y/N) No. ft ft ft (ASR/ LFR / tons tons tons . . No. . LRFR) - 31 98271 08370200 Reecer Cr. Rd over Hiline Canal N 56 32 concrete 1994 1 Fall 2017 ~on-Calculated Evaluation 32 89321 08433400 Wilson Creek Rd over Cascade Canal N 1994 1 Fall 2017 Non-Calculated Evaluation 33 99325 08434800 Thomas Rd over Naneum Creek N 1994 1 Summer 2017 Non-Calculated Evaluation 34 70331 08452500 4th Parallel Rd over Turbine Canal N 1994 1 Fall 2017 Non-Calculated Evaluation 35 70231 08596400 Boylston over Ground Relief N 145 32 concrete 1994 1 Summer 2017 Non-Calculated Evaluation 36 4281 08632300 Storie Lane over Little Creek N 50 44 concrete 1994 I 1 Summer 2017 Non-Calculated Evaluation 1 70141 8623200 STEVENS RD CULVERTS 25 23 Steel 1 Arch· Calc . No load rating summary sheet 2 78021 08622900 Anderson Road 22 22 Steel 2001 1 Arch· Calc. 3 79301 08623000 Ringer Road Culverts 23 23 Steel 2001 1 Arch· Calc. 4 70091 08623100 Parke Creek Multiplate 68 24 Iron/Alum 2001 1 Arch· Calc. 5 78112 08673000 Umptanum Rd over Anderson Slough 22 22 Steel 2001 1 Arch· Calc. 6 88261 08742300 Bowers Rd over Whiskey Creek 22 22 Steel 2001 1 Arch· Calc. 1 78041 08012900 Brown Rd over Manastash Canal N 1994 LRFR 1.28 1.41 1.56 1 Ca lc. 2 88082 08073400 Clarke Rd N 30 32 1999 ASR/LFR 25 40 40.7 1 Calc . 3 16203 08271500 N. Fork Teanaway Rd N 1994 LRFR 1.29 1.38 1.47 1 Calc . 4 68161 08863700 Durr Road . Wenas WLA N 60 56 Steel 2014 1 Calculate 5 88283 08377700 Dry Creek Rd over Currier Creek N _-0-'-1994 LRFR 1.10 1.21 1.34 1 Calc . 6 88322 08434200 Weaver Rd over Westside Ditch N 1994 LRFR 1.26 1.34 1.53 1 Calc . 1 97211 08285300 Hayward Rd over Hiline Canal N 2002 ASR/LFR 72.9 108.9 144 2 2022 2 4272 0007016B Hundley Road N 1996 LRFR 2.95 3.51 3.67 2 2022 3 79011 07966000 No. 81 Rd over Cooke Creek N 24 24 1994 LRFR 1.49 1.63 1.81 2 2022 4 95011 0 7971 500 Upper Peoh Pt. Road N 1994 LRFR 2.26 1.85 1.82 2 2022 ~ 95021 117985000 Upper Peoh Pt. Road N 1994 LRFR 2.35 2.07 2.13 2 2022 6 94021 07988600 W Sparks Rd • Kachess River N 1994 LRFR 3.78 3.00 2_90 2 2022 7 95031 07998200 Mohar Road N 1994 LRFR 1.74 1.53 1.60 2 2022 8 3031 7998800 W SPARKS RD-KACHESS RIV LRFR 2.40 2.02 1.65 2 2022 9 87051 08030600 Taneum Rd over Taneum Creek N 1994 LRFR 1.74 1.47 1.50 2 2022 10 89052 118031400 Wilson Creek Rd over Hiline Cnl N 1994 LRFR 2.09 1.85 1.90 2 2022 11 95061 08047200 Westside Rd over Hiline Cana l N 1994 LRFR 2.03 1.74 1.74 2 2022 12 6061 0 8051800 Teanaway Rd over Teanaway Rvr N 136 1994 LRFR 1.65 1.65 1.65 2 2022 13 96082 118082300 Upper Peoh Rd over Hiline Canal N 1994 LRFR 2.05 1.76 1.81 2 2022 14· 96091 08100100 Upper Peoh Rd over Hiline Canal N 1994 LRFR 2.04 1.75 1.80 2 2022 15 78102 0 8109800 Umptanum Rd over Yakima River 306 4.04 2.87 2.64 2 2022 16 70111 08127900 Stevens Road N 1996 ASR/LFR 43.1 54.5 62.3 2 2022 17 96111 08132600 Thorp Prairie over Hiline Canal N 1994 ASRjLFR 37.8 48.2 55.2 2 2022 18. 78131 08150900 Tjossem Rd over Wilson Creek N 1994 LRFR 2.8E; 2.92 3.28 2 2022 19 78132 08158900 ICanyon Rd over Wilson Creek N 20 80 2003 ASR/LFR 39 .1 62.7 77 .1 2 2022 20 77141 08174600lManastash Rd over Manastash Crk N 1994 LRFR 2.21 2.10 2.23 2 2022 ASR/LFR LRFR Legal Load Shortest Total Longest Method of Operating NRL Rating Factors Bridge LR? NRL Span Bridge Span Material Date of Last Load Tonnae:es KPFF Site Visitl Length Length Length Last Load Rating Type Type Type Type Type Type Group Notes Rating 3 352 3-3 3 352 3-3 No. Analysis Bridge ID. Name (YIN) No. ft ft ft 0 (ASRI LFRI tons tons tons 0 -No. LRFRI . 21 63181 08240000 Johnson Canyon Rd N 1995 LRFR 1.42 1.54 1.73 2 2022 22 79222 08294500 S. Ferguson Road N 35 36.5 1995 ASR/LFR 67.1 108.5 132 2 2022 23 97251 08330400 Smithson Road -Dry Creek N 26.0 26.0 2010 LRFR 2.31 2.45 2.81 2 2022 24 6251 08338800 E. Masterson Rd over Teanaway River N 150 1994 LRFR 1.95 1.63 1.63 2 2022 25 88273 08359200 Reecer Cr. Rd over Towne Ditch N 28.4 30 2003 ASRjLFR 46.1 67.6 89.5 2 2022 26 5271 08360500 S. Cle Elum Rd N 80 362 2004 ASR/LFR 57.5 80.6 92 2 2022 27 80281 08377000 Christensen Road N 1994 LRFR 2.42 2.54 2.98 2 2022 28 88292 08388200 Robinson Canyon Rd over Light Ditch N 1994 LRFR 1.41 1.52 1.72 2 2022 I 29 79291 08388300 Thrall Rd over Cherry Creek N 189 1994 LRFR 2.61 2.44 2.79 2 2022 I 30 88291 08394500 Thorp Hwy over Light Ditch N 1994 LRFR 2.88 3.04 3.58 2 2022 31 5301 08407900 Bullfrog Rd over Cle Elum River N 194 2004 ASR/LFR 52.5 54.7 57.6 2 2022 I 32 97311 08422200 Thorp Prairie Brid.ge N 1994 LRFR 2.71 2.51 2.69 2 2022 I 33 88333 08443300 Damman Rd over Yakima River N 434 1994 LRFR 4.04 2.87 2.64 2 2022 34 88341 08456400 BNRR Crossing over Cascade Way N 1994 LRFR 2.29 2.25 2.48 2 2022 35 80341 08458900 Parke Creek Rd over Hiline Canal N 1994 LRFR 2.14 2.30 2.58 2 2022 36 6345 08459600 Lambert Rd over Teanaway River N 120 1994 LRFR 2.35 1.86 1.82 2 2022 37 80344 08465900 Vantage Hwy over Hiline Canal N 1994 LRFR 2.23 2.42 2.68 2 2022 38 89342 08466600 Vantage Hwy over Cascade Canal N 20.5 24 2003 ASR/LFR 36.9 58.3 71.7 2 2022 39 97341 08468600 Yakima River Bridge N 270 2009 ASR/LFR 46.0 64.4 68 .4 2 2022 40 4351 08479900 Westside Rd over Hiline Canal N 1994 LRFR 1.80 1.59 1.71 2 2022 , 41 7271 08632400 Burke Rd Brid~e Reconstruction N 1996 ASR/LFR 48.5 64.8 77.6 2 2022 I 42 96071 08642000 Markovich Rd over Hiline Canal N 2000 ASR/LFR 71.3 88 .6 100 2 2022 43 60092 08674600 Borland Bridge N 31.83 32.7 2002 ASRjLFR 58 84.6 111 2 2022 44 88221 08674700 Reecer Cr. Rd over Currier Creek N 30 31.7 2003 ASR/LFR 47.6 71.1 94.1 2 2022 45 88223 08674800 Reecer Cr. Rd over Currier Creek N 25 26.7 2003 ASR/LFR 44.5 68.3 86.4 2 2022 46 88222 08674900 Reecer Cr. Rd over Currier Creek N 30 31.7 2003 ASR/LFR 53 79.3 105 2 2022 47 88153 08675000 Hungry Jet Rd over Currier Creek N 30 31.7 2003 ASR/LFR 48.9 73.2 96.7 2 2022 i 48 79133 08710100 Cleman Bridge N 54.5 57.5 2004 ASR/LFR 56.9 83.4 102 2 2022 I 49 89053 08758200 Bar 14 Rd Bridge over Hiline Creek N 119 2007 ASR/LFR 62.5 92.9 116 2 2022 i 50 99201 08772200 Naneum Rd over Naneum Creek N 55 2008 ASR/LFR 61.5 94.3 112 2 2022 51 98288 08804800 Charlton Rd over Naneum Creek N 55 2009 A5R/LFR 54.5 104.0 124 2 2022 52 5012 08804900 West Fork over Teanaway Rd N 105.3 2009 ASR/LFR 78.8 98.6 160 2 2022 1 89301 08405900 Sanders Rd over Wilson Creek Y 0.99 2013 3 NRL < 1.0: No SHV rating 2 87053 08033700 ·Thorp Cern Rd over Taneum Crk Y 1.98 108.3 2013 3 3 70083 08073600 Prater Rd over Pa rke Creek Y 1.83 129 2013 3 4, 3112 08123400 ,Railroad St over Yakima River Y 1.25 200 200 3 5 70232 08313800 Stevens Rd over Johnson Creek Y 1.16 70 2013 3 6 16081 08805100 Jack Creek Culvert Y 1.74 22 2011 3 7 79242 P8827800 Badger Pocket Rd Ditch Y 1.01 25.7 2011 3 a 99302 08832800 Cooke Can Rd over Cooke Creek Y 1.18 51 2011 3 9 4273 08850000 little Creek Bridge Y 1.66 48 2012 3 ASR!LFR LRFR Legal Load Shortest Total Longest Method of Operating NRL Rating Factors Bridge LR? NRL Span Bridge Span Material Date of Last Load Tonnages KPFF Site Visit! Length Length Length Last Loa l! Rating Type Type Type Type Type Type Group Analysis Notes Rating 3 352 3-3 3 352 3-3 No. Bridge 10. Name (Y!N) No. ft ft ft -(ASR! LFR! tons tons tons ---No. LRFR) 10 4292 08851600 Big Creek Bridge Y 1.95 68 2012 3 11 79046 08873800 Towne Ditch Y 1.99 40 2015 3 12 79048 08875300 KITTITAS HWY -NANEUM CR Y 1.14 40 2015 3 13 79045 08875400 Kittitas Hwy over Coleman Creek Y 1.17 27 2015 3 ~4 77171 088828~0 1 Manastash Rd over NF Creek Y 1.42 38.5 2016 1 3 --~ --~ ~---