HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes-2016-081BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -02 I
AMEND WESTSIDE ROAD AND HUNTZINGER ROAD 2014 HSIP GRANT APPLICATION
AND AUTHORIZE THE SIGNATURE OF THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER ON THE
AMENDED APPLICATION
WHEREAS: Kittitas County Public Works submitted a HSIP Grant Application in June 2014
(Resolution 2014-106) supporting safety improvements to Westside Road and
Huntzinger Road; and
WHEREAS: The cost estimate for design elements supporting Westside Road are
significantly less than the amount originally identified in the 2014 Grant
Application ; and
WHEREAS: Huntzinger Road has numerous areas of risk owing to the lack of guardrail; and
WHEREAS: Public Works staff desires re-tasking the Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP) funds supporting guardrail deployment along Huntzinger Road; and
WHEREAS: Amending the original grant application requires approval from the Washington
State Department of Transportation;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners , in the best
interest of the public, does hereby direct staff prepare an amended grant application submitting
same to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) providing additional
funding to Huntzinger Road and reducing funding for Westside Road maintaining the original
amount of HSIP project funding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Road Engineer is authorized to sign the grant
application amendment and submit same to WSDOT.
DATED this 21st day of June , 2016 , at Ellensburg, Washington .
Attest:
~. Clerk of the Board-Julie Kjorsvik
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASH~NGTON
dlL~~
Obie O'Brien, Chairman
2014 County Safety Program
Grant Application Washington state
Deportment of Transportation
Highways and Local Programs Division
Instructions
Please read and fill out this grant application completely. Applications that are not complete will not be considered. Applications
can be filled out by hand and attachme nts can be hand dr awn . Applicati ons are due Monday, June 30, 2014 bye-mail to
hlpgrants@wsdol.wa .gov . Please refer to County Safety Program in the subject line of your email.
If you have questions about this progrCjm, would like technical ass istance to analyZe ·coms lon data or develop the grant
application , or would like to share a concept-l~vel idea for a proposal, please contact:
• Matlhew Enders, P.E., Technical Services Manager, 360 -705 -6907 ,matthew.enders@wsdot.wa .gov
or contact the Regio n Local Programs Engineer aSSigned to your juri sd iction . Please see
htlp :IIWW'N . wsdot. wa.gov/LocalProgramsiregional.htm for con tact in formation.
Date: June 23, 2014
Project title: Kittitas County Roadway Safety Improvements
Does the project currently have federal funding? No
Federal aid project number (If assigned): N/A
Comments, if any: N/A
Jurisdiction name: Kittitas County Public Works Department
WSDOT region ass igne d to the jurisdiction: See http://www .wsdoLwa.gov/LocaIProgramsiregional.htm for more information. o Northw~t 0 Olympi c 0 Southwest 0 North Central 0 South Central 0 Eastern
Name of contact person(s) for questions about this grant application: Jan Ollivier
Title: Transportation Manager
Phone: 509-962-7523
E-mail : jan .olllvler@co .kittitas .wa .us
Mailing address: 411 North Ruby . Suite 1, Ellensburg WA 98926
Legislative district(s): 13
Congressional district: 8
Brief project description: Provide a short (one paragraph) summary of the project worK (do not include quantities here).
ProVide safety improvements that will include removing roadside safety hazards, reducing steep side slopes if it isn't cost
prohibitive . and either alerting Qr protecting drivers from running off the side of the road with gua rdrail, rumble strips, or traffic
delineators-as deemed needed using engineering standards.
Comments, if any:
Page 1 of5
Local Road Safety Plan Methodology : Provide a description of you r local road safety plan development/prioritization process .
Describe what crash types/factors were prioritized , what risk factors were considered , how many "stars" are available for any
individual road segment or intersection based on those risk factors, and what your priOritization process is between different
countermeasures (based on cost, crash type addressed , etc.).
The Kittitas County Road Safety Plan was developed by determining the types of crashes tha t occur disproportionately in our
county as compared to all counties in the state and all public roads in the state. Analysis was performed to reveal where
crashes are occurring and other factors that could contribute to crashes including the roadway characteristics, time of day, and
type of vehicle. Data used for this evaluation was prov ided by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The
data was from four years of detailed information about crashes on Kittitas County roads (2008 through 2012). The collision data
showed that fatal and serious injury collisions occur at a disproportionately higher rate on county roads than on all public roads
in Washington State. Therefore, this Safety Plan focuses on reducing potential fatal and serious injury collisions in Kittitas
County .
The cause of fatal and serious injury collisions in Kittitas County is typically due to "hitting a fixed object" and "overturning ." Fatal
and serious injury collis ions are also occurring under at le ast one of the following types of conditions : dark or dusk lighting, at
non -Intersection locatio ns, on roadway curves (horizontal curve), exceeding sale speed, crOSSing over the centerline , vehicl e
type of motorcycle , and on road s with 50 mph sp eed limits. The County's road log al so sh owe d a high frequency of fatal an d
s.erio us injury collis ions on road s that are paved, have a pavement width of 26' or less, and have an Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
volume of 175 or more .
Due to the rural nature of our county, almost all Kittitas County roads fall under the category "no lighting,· so this characteristic
was not evaluated further. Additionally, most of the roads have a pavement width of 26' or less , so the evaluation considered
on ly roa ds that are 24' or less in width to focu s on the narrowest roads for safety improvements . The "motorcycle " category was
not evBl uated further becau se it is not a road characteri stic.
In order to have the greatest potential impact in reducing collisions, the County considered roads for evaluation and prioritization
for safety improvements with the following characteristics:
•. Paved (ACP, HMA, or BST).
• Pavement width of 24' or less .
• ADT of 175 or more .
• Posted speeds of 35 or more.
• Collision at this site in the past 4 years .
• Roads that have been previously identified in the County's hazard elimination plan .
The county road segments with the cha racteristi cs listed above wer e prio ritiz ed using contribUting factors identified from the
colli sion data. The prioritiz ation factors and thei r scores are shown in bel ow:
Meets minimum criteria and was included in previous hazard elimination plan
Does not meet minimum criteria and was included in previous hazard elim . plan
Meets minimum criteria but not included in prev ious hazard elim ination plan
Over 50% of the side slopes are too steep
About 10% to 50% of side slopes too sleep
At least one section has side slopes too steep
Over 50% of the road has fixed objects in clear zone
About 10% to 50% of the road has fixed objects in clear zone
At least one section of the road has fixed objects in clear zone
Over 50% of the road is in a horizontal curve
About 10% to 50% of the road is in a horizontal curve
At least one section of the road is in a horizontal curve
ONE OR MORE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURY COLLISION(S) -2008 THROUGH 2012
20 po ints
10 points
5 po ints
20 points
10 points
5 points
20 points
10 points
5 points
20 points
10 points
5 points
15 points each
Page 2 of 5
Kittitas County proposes to improve the safety of road segments that received a score of 50 or higher. This includes the road
segments below :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11 .
12 .
13 .
14.
15 .
16 .
17.
Huntzinger Road MP 0.24 to MP 6.99
Westside Road MP 4.10 to MP 7.29
Huntzinger Road MP 2.70 to MP 5.07
Huntzinger Road MP 5.07 to MP 6.99
Tho rp Prairie Rd MP 0.00 to MP 3.51
Casassa Road MP 0.00 to MP 1.12
Denmark Road MP 3.08 to MP 4.35
Horvatt Road MP 0.00 to MP 0.46
Huntz inger Road MP 6.99 to MP 10 .7 4
Lyons Road MP 0.00 to MP 1.49
MF Teanaway MP 0.00 to MP 1.19
Reecer Creek Rd MP 4.80 to MP 6.68
Teanaway Road MP 0.00 to MP 0.02
Thomas Road MP 0.00 to MP 1.51
Umptanum Road MP 3.10 to MP 5.22
Via Kachess Rd MP 0.00 to MP 2.22
Watson Cutoff Rd MP 0.00 to MP 1.12
Comments, if any :
score 80
score 75
score 65
score 65
score 60
score 55
sco re 55
score 50
score 50
score 50
score 50
score 50
score 50
score 50
score 50
score 50
score 50
See attached Kitt itas County's 2014 County Road Safety Plan , adoption by Reso lution 106 , for more details .
Project des cr lptfon. prio rity, cost, and de tai led locati ons fo r work: Please describe in detail the specific improvements to
~e made (in your funding priority order) and the location(s) where the improvements will be made. Please use the format below .
please include category Information (countermeasure type rstar" rating I PE al7ld CN costs) and specific location information
(road names, road numbers, and beginning/ending mileposts). Note ,that cost informC!tion should be listed independently for
each priQrity (assume only Priority 1 is funded for the cost in formation provided with Priority 1). A detailed cost estimate tor each
priority should be attached to this application. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Please also attach a vicinity map(s) t/1al
identifies the location of all improvements.
Priority #1
InslC!U low cost improvements such as delineators and signage throughout corr idor as needed at locations scoring 80 .
• Huntzinger Road , #75040 , MP 0.24 to MP 2.70
PE = $3,000, CN = $18,000
Vic inity Map J
Priority #2 .
a.) Install brid ge-rail and related improve ment s at locali ons scoring 75.
• Wes tsid e Road , #2271 0, MP 4.10 to MP 7.29
At MP 6.0 I PE = $33 ,000, CN = $318,000
Vicinity Map B
b.) Insta ll safety im provements such as guardrai l and related improvements at locations scoring 75 .
• We_stside Rqad,#227 10, MP 4.10 to MP 7.29
At MP 4.3-4 .5/ PE = $15,000, CN = $213 ,000 .
Vicinity Map B
Note : PE has already been started for priority #2 improvements.
Page 3 of 5
Priorlly,#3
Install , gua rdrail and low cost improvements such as del ineators and signage at locations scoring 65.
• Huntz inger Rd , #75040, MP 2.70 to MP 5.07
PE = $70 ,000, CN = $476,000
Vicinity Map J
• Huntzinger Road, #75040 , MP 5.07 to MP 6.99
$20,000 , TOTAL CN = $142,000.
Vicinity Map J
Pri oritv#4
Insta ll guardrail and replace non-standard cable at locations scoring 60.
• Thorp Prairie Road, #52770, MP 0.00 to MP 3.51
PE = $63,000 , CN = $418,000
Vicinity Map F
Priori tv #5
Preliminary en gi neeri ng and survey to determine locations on road segments that qualify for safety improvements and
prioritization of segments at locations sc oring 50 to 55.
• Casas sa Road, #2616.0, MP 0.00 to MP 1.12
Vloinity Map C
• D.enm ark Road, #63501, MP 3.08 to MP 4.35
Vicinity Map I
• Horvatt Road, #25850, MP 0.00 to MP 0.46
Vicinity Map B
• Huntzin ger Road, #75040, MP 6,99 to MP 10.74
Vicinity Map J
• Lyons Road, #40772, MP 0.00 to MP 1.49
Vicinity Map H
• MF Tean away, #29510, MP 0.00 to MP 1.19
Vi cini ty Map E
• Reec er Creek Rd, #93526, MP 4.80 to MP 6.68
Vici nity Ma:p G
• Teana way Road, #28500 , MP 0.00 to MP 0.02
Vicinity Map 0
• Thomas Road, #43132, MP 0.00 to MP 1.51
Vicinity Map H
• Umptan um Rd , #96937, MP 3.10 to MP 5.22
Vicinity Map I
• Via Kachess Rd, #13700, MP 0,00 to MP 2.22
Vic inity Map A
• Watson Cutoff Rd, #25620, MP 0.00 to MP 1.12
Vicinity Map C
TOTAL PE = $60 ,000
Comments, if any:
Total cost estima tes by priorily :
Pri ority #1 PE: $ 3,0 00 CN : $ 18,0 00
Pri ority #2 aPE: $33,000 CN: $318 ,000
Pri ority #2 b PE : $15,000 CN : $2 13,000
Priority '#3 P2 $90 ,000 eN : $61 8,000
PrioriIY '#4 PE : $63,000 CN : $41 8.000
Prio~!y#5 PE : $60.DOO N/A
TOTAL: $ 21,000
TOTAL: $ 351 ,000
TOTAL: $ 228,000
TOTAL: $ 708,000
TOTAL: $ 481,000
TOTAL: $ 60,000
Page 40f 5
Estimated milestones from the project schedule
Please provide the estimated month and year for each item below . The milestones need to be determined assuming that the
project will be built by contract, not by local agency or a partner agency's forces . If milestones vary for different
countermeasures in your project, please identify separate milestones/dates (and identify which countermeasures fit each set of
dates) for different countermeasures as needed.
Prolect schedule below for Priority #1 through Prlorltv #4:
• Project added to local agen cy TIP : 10/14 (completed for Priority #2)
• Project added to regional TIP: 11/14 (completed for Priority #2)
• Project added to STIP: 1/15 (completed for Priority #2)
• Project definition (begin PE): 1/15 (completed for Priority #2)
• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) kickoff: 3/15
• Environmental documents approved: 12/15
• Right of Way start: N/A
• Right of Way complete: N/A
• Geometric/30% Design complete: 3/15 (completed for Priority #2)
• General Plan/60% Design complete: 6115 (complete for Priority #2)
• Advertisement: 1/16
• Contract Awarded: 3/16
• Open to traffic (operationally complete): 6/16
Project schedule below for Priorit~ #5 (PE on l ~):
• Project added to local agency TIP : 10/14
• Project added to regional TIP: 11/14
• Project added to STIP: 1115
• Project definition (begin PE): 1/15
• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) kickoff: N/A
• Environmental documents approved: N/A
• Right of Way start: N/A
• Right of Way complete: N/A
• Geometric/30% Design complete: 9115
• General Plan/60% Design complete: 12115
• Advertisement: N/A
• Contract Awarded: N/A
• Open to traffic (operationally complete): N/A
Comments, if any:
Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT A
VICINITY MAPS
Vicinity Map A
~~ Via Kachess Road
3,200 1,600 o 3,200 Feet
Vicinity Map B
6,250 3,125 o
s
s ummi t
V,ie . Rd
6,250 Feet
3352 Rd Fs
Vicinity Map C
4,750 2,375 o 4,750 Feet
Vicinity Map D
=:~~~~1~~ Teanaway Road
"0
((
.:.: u .~
Q)
E w
Leo LIl
2,375 0 4,750 Feet -===-c::::I __ _
;1
Vicinity Map E
Middle Fork Teanaway Road
4,750 2,375 o 4,750 Feet
Vicinity Map F
Fs 3300 Rd
4,750 2,375 o 4,750 Feet
Vicinity Map G
Reecer Creek Road
;. l
·(i)J. _ .. '
I
!I
4,750 Feet -===-c::::. __ _ o
Vicinity Map H
6,250 3,125
=--=--
-11;-
!~
oc Ln frindro
._
t[~ ____ = __ .=. -=-__ ~$e "
S n~Rd I -~--
o 6,250 Feet
i I I I' I Manastash 'I
.. __ .~d /I
II
-
II ':\ /,
iI II
/1
\('"
Vicinity Map I
M~ClA'I0!!9 h Rd
li
Re 11
Rd... ~ -
I
6,250 o 6,250 Feet
Vicinity Map J
Huntzinger Road
MP 2.70 to MP 5.07
Huntzinger Road
MP 5.07 to MP 6.99
Huntzinger Road
MP 6.99 to MP 10.74
12,000 6,000 0 12,000 Feet
ATTACHMENT B
DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
Priority #1 Huntzinger Road
#75040
MP 0.24 to MP 2.70
DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
Road Grant Cost Estimate 6-25-14
Priority #1
Huntzinger Road MP .24-2.7
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST UNIT TOTAL COST
Corner Chevrons 12 $ 200.00 EA $ 2,400 .00
Limited Sight Distance Sign 4 $ 215.00 EA $ 860.00
Flexible Guide Posts 178 $ 40.00 EA $ 7,120.00
Traffic Control 1 $ 1,500.00 EST $ 1,500.00
TESC 1 $ 500.00 EST $ 500.00
Mobilization at 10% 1 $ 1,250.00 EST S 1,250.00
SUB-TOTAL $ 13,630.00
Contingency at 10 % 1 EST $ 1,363.00
Design at 10% 1 EST $ 1,363.00
CM at 10% 1 EST S 1,363.00
ITOTAL ESTIMATE $ 17,719.00 I
Priority #2 Westside Road
#22710
MP 4.10 to MP 7.29
DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
NO.
0001
0035
0049
0187
0310
0431
0470
1160
1163
1164
1165
3091
3541
3542
4006
4013
4025
4410
5100
5120
5767
5830
5835
5837
SEI #A11178.26
Project: Westside Road
Designed By: MJS
n~ P loiD ) ')to:t lO{) '"?oS +OC t-c>
~(\.""(C\) "3r:2..~ 00
File: Estimate30Sto312.xlsx
Date: 3/25/2014
Page 1
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST COST
PREPARATION
MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000
CLEARING AND GRUBBING L.S. 1 $ 640 .00 $ 640
REMOVING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH o $ 1,000.00 $
REMOVING PAINT LINE L.F. 700 $ 1.00 $ 700
GRADING
ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL C.Y. 73 $ 10.00 $ 730
GRAVEL BORROW INCL. HAUL TON 231 $ 10.00 $ 2,310
EMBANKMENT COMPACTION C.Y. 114 $ 2.50 $ 285
DRAINAGE
UNDERDRAIN PIPE 6 IN. DIAM. L.F. o $ 11.00 $
UNDERDRAIN PIPE 12 IN. DIAM . L.F. o $ 45.00 $
UNDERDRAIN PIPE 15 IN. DIAM . L.F. 90 $ 50.00 $ 4,500
UNDERDRAIN PIPE i81N. DIAM. L.F. o $ 50.00 $
STORM SEWER
.CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 EACH o $ 1,500 .00 $
SCHEDULE A STORM SEWER PIPE 121N. DIAM . L.F. o $ 45.00 $
SCHEDULE A STORM SEWER PIPE i81N. D1AM . L.F. o $ 50 .00 $
STRUCTURE
STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS A INCL. HAUL C.Y. 76 $ 15 ,00 $ 1,140
SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CL. A L.S. 1 $ 9,130.00 $ 9,130
GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR WALL C.Y. 20 $ 40.00 $ 800
BRIDGE RAILING TYPE THRIE BEAM L.F. 117 $ 300.00 $ 35,100
RETAINING WALL L.S. 1 $ 16,600.00 $ 16,600
SURFACING
CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE TON 85 $ 17.00 $ 1,445
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE TON 43 $ 25 .00 $ 1,075
HOT MIXED ASPHALT
HMA CL. 1/2 IN. PG 64·28 TON 51 $ 80.00 $ 4,080
JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000
COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000
ASPHALT COST PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000
MGENT
SaqJenl Engine .... Inc.
320 Ronlee Lan. PtN
0I~1a. WA 98502
Tel 36CH181·92B4
SEI #A11178.26
Project: Westside Road
Designed By: MJS
File: Estimate305to312.xlsx
Date: 3/25/2014
Page 2
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT aTY UNIT CaST COST NO.
EROSION CONTROL A~D ROADSIDE PLANTING
6373 SILT FENCE L.F. 1400 $ 3.00 $ 4,200
6403 ESC LEAD DAY 4 $ 100.00 $ 400
6416 SEEDING, FERTILIZING, AND MULCHING L.S. 1 $ 448.50 $ 449
6490 EROSIONIW ATER POLLUTION CONTROL EST. 1 $ 20,000 .00 $ 20,000
TRAFFIC
6748 BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1 • 8 FT. LONG POST L.F. o $ 25.00 $
6711 BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 31 -8 FT. LONG POST LF. 222 $ 25.00 $ 5,550
6717 BEAM GUARDRAIL NON·FLARED TERMINAL EACH o $ 3,000.00 $
6719 BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 31 NON·FLARED TERMINfl EACH 5 $ 2,500.00 $ 12,500
6760 BEAM GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 22 EACH 4 $ 3,000.00 $ 12,000
6771 BEAM GUARDRAIL ANCHOR TYPE 1 EACH 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000
6806 PAINT LINE L.F . 2100 $ 0.20 $ 420
6971 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S . 1 $ 11,400.00 $ 11,400
OTHER
7006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL. HAUL C.Y. 17 $ 12 .00 $ 204
7008 SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B S.F. 206 $ 7.00 $ 1,442
7014 GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR DRAIN C.Y. 22 $ 40.00 $ 880
7037 STRUCTURE SURVEYING L.S . 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000
7038 ROADWAY SURVEYING L.S. 1 $ 15,000 .00 $ 15,000
7490 TRIMMING AND CLEANUP L.S. 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000
7550 CONSTRUCTION GEOTEXTILE FOR UNDERGROUN S.Y. 59 $ 2.00 $ 118
7736 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000
SUBTOTAL $ 253 ,098
)NTINGENCIES $ 25,310
TOTAL $ 278 ,4 07 rJeJ)
:::: ~2."O)O~O (r"ou .
T '3.8 ~ o{) CEi
)
4, 3J8i 00 f:)
(Y\ (' ~."3 ~ HIS
S\-o.-tlCf) ;2.<.~)q + DC, -tc 2."2-"~ t-0 0
SARGENT SEI #Al1178.26 File: Estimate in Piece_6_23_14.xlsx
SJrgonl Eng_IS In::
320 Ronl .. u.n. NI'/
0 :1'"1"0, WI. 98$O?
Ttl 3&0-&37-9264
Project: Westside Road Date: 6/23/2014
Designed By: MJS Page 1
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
209+00 to 229+00
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST QTY COST NO.
PREPARATION
0001 MOBILIZATION L.S. $ 1.00 1 $1 4,646
0035 CLEARING AND GRUBBING L.S. $ 1.00 1 $1,361
0049 REMOVING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $ 1,000 .00 0 $0
0187 REMOVING PAINT LINE L.F. $ 1.00 2000 $2,000
GRADING
0310 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 10.00 269 $2,691
0431 GRAVEL BORROW INCL. HAUL TON $ 10.00 168 $1,681
0470 EMBANKMENT COMPACTION C.Y. $ 2.50 83 $207
DRAINAGE
1160 UNDERDRAIN PIPE 6 IN. DIAM. L.F. $ 11.00 160 $1,760
1163 UNDERDRAIN PIPE 12 IN. DIAM, L.F. $ 45.00 176 $7,920
1164 UNDERDRAIN PIPE 151N. DIAM. L.F. $ 50.00 0 $0
1165 UNDERDRAIN PIPE 181N. DIAM , L.F. $ 50.00 0 $0
STORM SEWER
3091 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 EACH $ 1,500 .00 0 $0
3541 SCHEDULE A STORM SEWER PIPE 121N. DIAM . L.F. $ 45.00 0 $0
3542 SCHEDULE A STORM SEWER PIPE 18 IN . DIAM . L.F . $ 50.00 0 $0
STRUCTURE
4006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS A INCL. HAUL C.Y . $ 15 .00 126 $1,890
4013 SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CL. A L.S. $ 1.00 1 $11,280
4025 GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR WALL C.Y . $ 40 .00 59 $2,360
4410 BRIDGE RAILING TYPE THRIE BEAM L.F. $ 300 .00 0 $0
RETAINING WALL L.S. $ 1.00 1 $22,600
SURFACING
5100 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE TON $ 17,00 278 $4,72 9
5120 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE TON $ 25,00 139 $3,477
HOT MIXED ASPHALT
5767 HMA CL. 1/2 IN . PG 64-28 TON $ 80.00 167 $13,354
5830 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC $ 1,200 .00 1 $1,200
5835 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC $ 1,500.00 1 $1,500
5837 ASP HAL T COST PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC $ 1,500 .00 1 $1,500
SARGENT SEI #A11178.26 File: Estimate in Piece_6_23_14,xlsx
Sa'90f1i Eng;noets I",.
32D Ronl"" lane IWI
O~mp," IVA 98502
1t! 3w-601""M
Project: Westside Road Date: 6/23/2014
ITEM
NO.
6373
6403
6416
6490
6748
6711
6717
6719
6760
6771
6806
6971
7006
7008
7014
7037
7038
7490
7550
7736
Designed By: MJS Page 2
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
209+00 to 229+00
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST aTY COST
EROSION CONTROL AND ROADSIDE PLANTING
SILT FENCE L.F. $ 3.00 2910 $8,730
ESC LEAD DAY $ 100.00 3 $348
SEEDING, FERTILIZING, AND MULCHING L.S. $ 1.00 1 $828
EROSIONIWATER POLLUTION CONTROL EST. $ 2,000.00 1 $2,000
TRAFFIC
BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1 -8 FT. LONG POST L.F. $ 25.00 0 $0
BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 31-8 FT. LONG POST L.F. $ 25.00 838 $20,950
BEAM GUARDRAIL NON-FLARED TERMINAL EACH $ 3,000.00 0 $0
BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 31 NON-FLARED TERMINA EACH $ 2,500.00 6 $15,000
BEAM GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE 22 EACH $ 3,000.00 0 $0
BEAM GUARDRAIL ANCHOR TYPE 1 EACH $ 1,000.00 0 $0
PAINT LINE L.F. $ 0.20 6000 $1,200
PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S . $ 1.00 1 $8 ,522
OTHER
STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 12 .00 24 $288
SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B S.F. $ 7.00 326 $2,282
GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR DRAIN C.Y. $ 40.00 18 $720
STRUCTURE SURVEYING L.S. $ 500.00 1 $500
ROADWAY SURVEYING L.S. $ 1,500.00 1 $1,500
TRIMMING AND CLEANUP L.S. $ 1,500.00 1 $1,500
CONSTRUCTION GEOTEXTILE FOR UNDERGROUN[ S.Y. $ 2.00 92 $184
SPCC PLAN L.S. $ 400.00 1 $400
SUBTOTAL $161 ,109
ITINGENCIES $16,111
TOTAL $177,219
-l' \ gS,otJO c,..OuNItJ)
-+ If, 000_ c.€"
-t ).../3} or;o
Priority #3 Huntzinger Road
#75040
MP 2.70 to MP 5.07 and MP 5.07 to MP 6.99
DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
Priority #3
Huntzinger Road MP 2.7-5.07
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST UNIT TOTAL COST
Corner Chevrons 10 $ 200.00 EA $ 2,000.00
Limited Sight Distance Sign 2 $ 215.00 EA $ 430.00
Flexible Guide Posts 108 $ 40.00 fA $ 4,320.00
Guardrail Type 31 9450 $ 28.00 LF $ 264,600.00
Guardrail Type 31 Transition 4 $ 3,750.00 EA $ 15,000.00
Type 31 Non-Flared Terminal 14 $ 3,000.00 EA S 42,000.00
Traffic Control 1 EST $ 16,500.00
TESC 1 EST $ 1,000.00
Mobilization 1 EST $ 20,000.00
SUB-TOTAL $ 365,850.00
Contingency at 10 % 1 EST $ 36,566.00
DeSign at 10% 1 EST $ 36,585 .00
CM at 10% 1 EST $ 36,585 .00
ITOTAl ESTIMATE $ 475,586.00 I
Huntzinger Road MP 5.07-6.99
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST UNIT TOTAL COST
Corner Chevrons 24 $ 200.00 EA $ 4,800.00
Corner Ahead Sign 2 $ 215.00 EA $ 430.00
Curves Ahead Sign 6 $ 215.00 EA $ 1,290.00
Flexible Guide Posts 62 $ 40.00 EA $ 2,480.00
Guardrail Type 31 1635 $ 28.00 LF $ 45,780.00
Type 31 Non-Flared Terminal 8 $ 3,000.00 EA $ 24,000.00
Traffic Control EST $ 4,000.00
TESC EST $ 500.00
Mobilization EST $ 4,000.00
SUB-TOTAL $ 87,280.00
Contingency at 10 % EST $ 36,566.00
Design at 10% EST $ 8,728.00
CM at 10% EST $ 8,728.00
ITOTAL ESTIMATE $ 141,302.00 I
COMBINED TOTAL $ 616,888.00
Priority #4 Thorp Prairie Road
#52770
MP 0.00 to MP 3.51
DETAILED COST ESTIMATES
Priority"4 Thorp Prairie Road 1152770 MP 0.00 to MP 3.51
EXISTING CABU'GUARDRAIL UVGAAllEAT Ml' 11
LENGTH E. W.
MP MP IN FT Termln.' Termln.1 RECOMMENDATIONS
THORP PRAIRIE ROAD NORTH SIDE 0.741 0.711 80 1 1 We.t Side: extend 40' West,
THORP PRAIRIE ROAD SOUTH SIDE 0.741 0.711 108 1 1 West Side: Continue new GR
COST ESTIMATE 10 REPLACE EXACT LOCATIONS OF CJlBLf
UNIT UNIT COST QTY TOTAL
REMOVE CABLE GUARDRAil IF $ 5 .00 188 $ 940.00
REMOVE CABLE GUARDRAllANCHOR EA $ 325.00 4 $ 1,300.00
BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 31 NON·FLARED
TERMINAL EA S 3,000.00 4 $ 12,000.00
BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 318 It POST Lf $ 28.00 5SB $ 15,624.00
FilL & CULVERTS LS EST $ 5,000.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL LS EST $ 2,000.00
MOBILIZATION LS EST S 2,000.00
rESe LS EST $ 1,000.00
RESTORATION & PLANTING LS EST $ 1,000.00
SUB-TOTAL $ 40,864.00
Contingency at 10 % I EST S 4,086.40
Design .t 10% J EST $ 4,086.40
eM.t 10% I EST S 4.086.40
lOTAl E$TIM4TE $ 5),123.20
SAFOv IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE RtMAINOUl Of1m ROAD ...
LENGTH E. W.
MP MP IN FT Torm'",1 Terminal Radius T.ansltlon RECOMMENDATIONS
Soulh 0.6 200 1 1
South 0.9 275 1 1
North 1.5 200 CY fill In lieu of GR
/IIorth 1.7 100 1 1
South 1.7 175 1 1
North 2 100 CV fill in lieu 01 GR
/liE Co.ner of Mdge 2 15 1 1
SE Corner 0' Bridge 2 15 1 1
5W Corner of Bridge 2 10 1 1
NW Corner of Bridge 2 150 1 1
Move 2 Power Poles Out or Oear Zone No Cost -PUD or P5E to
E.st of Horlick Int. North side of Road 2 Relociite per franchise
North, From Pit to East side of Driveway 3.7 100 CY Fill in lieu 01 GR
North, Wen of Driveway 3.7 975 1 1
South Side lone driveway In middle of
proposed GR Run, hence 2 Radius Term) 3.8 1475 1 1 2
North extend from existing GR to R.dlu$
Term 4.6 40 1
North 5 30 1
Move Pole in aea. 20ne North Side of No eo,t-PUD or PSE to
Road (Pole Is Guy Support Br.ce for OHP) S.S Relocate per Franchise
North & South Sid •• 5.6 200 CY Fill in lieu 01 GR
Relocate & Replace Mailbox at 8710.3
Type 3 5.4
Relocate & Replace Mailbox .t 9121 xl
Type 1 5.6
Shoulder Fill 6.1 50 CY Fill in lieu of GR
North 6_2 500 1 1
South 6.2 300 1 1 2
North 6.6 875 1 1
North 7 80 1 1
UNIT UNIT COST QTY TOTAL
BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 31 NON·FLARED
TERMINAL EA S 3.000.00 19 S 57,000.00
BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 318 It POST LF $ 28.00 5215 S 146,020.00
Guardrail Type 31 Tr.ns~ion EA $ 3,750.00 4 S 15,000.00
Select Borrow Incl Haul TN $ 10.00 1300 $ 13,000.00
Ernbankmtnt Compaction CV S 8.00 650 S 5,200.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL LS EST $ 12,000.00
MOBILIZATION LS EST $ 24,822.00
TESC l5 EST 5 3,500.00
RESTORATION & PLANTING l5 EST S 2,000.00
SUB-TOTAL S 278,542.00
Contingency at 10 % j EST S 27,854,20
Oe<ign.t 10% l EST $ 27,854.20
CM at 10% J EST S 27.854.20
1T00Al ffiTMII;fE -$ 361.104.60
COMBINEO TOTAL 415,221 .80
ATTACHMENT C
2014 COUNTY ROAD SAFETY PLAN
FOR KITTITAS COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KllTlTAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION
NO. ) DV
TO ADOPT A 2014 COUNTY ROAD SAFETY PLAN FOR KllTlTAS COUNTY
WHEREAS: In accordanoe with Washington State Department of Transportation's
(WSDOT) 2014 Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
County Safety Program oall for projeots, the Cou~nty Engineer has
prepared a Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2014; and
WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2014 identifies prioritized locations
for low oost safety improvements based upon crash and road log data as
set forth in WSDOT's 2014 HSIP County Safety Program call for projects;
and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners, after
due oonsideration, does hereby adopt the said Kittitas County Road
Safety Plan 2014, hereto attaohed, as now submitted by the Kittitas
County Direotor of Publio Works and County Engineer.
DATED Ihis \:1 d~y of ~z... ,2014 al Ellensburg, Washington .
-i')I\C{;\~
Clerk of the
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
~
o ie O'Bnen, Commissioner
Kittitas County Road Safety Plan 2014
June 17, 2014
Kittitas County Public Works Department
411 North Ruby Street, Suite 1
Ellensburg, WA 98926
Westside Road Mile Post 4.4 • Fatality Site
Introduction
The Kittitas County Road Safety Plan is a comprehensive program of safety improvements on county
roads. This program of improvements was developed by determining the types of crashes that occur
disproportionately in our county as compared to all counties in the state and all public roads In the
state. Analysis was performed to reveal where crashes are occurring and other factors that could
contribute to crashes including the roadway characteristics, time of day, and type of vehicle.
Data used for this evaluation was provided by Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT). The data was from four years of detailed information about crashes on Kittitas County roads
(2008 through 2012). WSDOT directed Kittitas County to prioritize needed safety improvements eligible
for WSDOT Safety Program grants based on this collision data.
The collision data showed that fatal and serious injury collisions occur at a disproportionately higher rate
on county roads than on all public roads in Washington State (see Table 1). Therefore, this Safety Plan
focuses on reducing potential fatal and serious injury collisions in Kittitas County.
TABLE 1
2008 through 2012 Crash Data
Collision Severity
All Counties -Co.
Kittitas County MaIntained Roa ds All Public Roads
%0/ %01 %0/
Collision Typ e H eraS/les cras hes # crashes crosh es #a:ashes C(tuhes
Fatal 5 0.7% 682 1.0% 2,190 0 .4%
Serious Inj uries 24 3.6% 2,564 3.6% 10,257 2.0%
Pr op erty Dam age On ly 644 95.7% 67,03 2 95.4% 501,547 97 .6%
Total Collision Ty pes 673 --------70,278 -------513,99 4 ... -.. ----
As shown in Table 2 below, the cause of fatal and serious injury collisions in Kittitas County is typically
due to "hitting a fixed object" and "overturning." Out of all ofthe fatal and serious injury collisions, 69%
were caused by drivers running into a fixed object such as ditches, embankments, and fences. An
additional 21% of the fatal and serious injury collisions were caused by vehicles overturning. Fatal and
serious injury collisions mainly occurred under at least one of the following types of conditions: dark or
dusk lighting, at non-intersection locat ions, on roadway curves (horizontal curve). exceeding safe speed,
crossing over the centerline, vehicle type of motorcycle, and on roads with 50 mph speed limits. See
Table 2 for more details .
TABLE 2
2008 through 2012 Crash Data
Fatal/Serious Injury Collision Types and Conditions
All Countfes -Co.
Kittitas County Maintained Roads AI/ Public Roads
%0/ %01 %0/
Co/Hsion Ty p e # crashes crashes # clashes crashes # crashes crashes
Hit Fixed Object-Roadway Ditch 6 20 .7% 171 5.3% 339 2 .7%
Hit Fixed Object-Ran Over Embankment 6 20.7% 136 4.2% 229 1.8%
Hit Fixed Object -Fence 2 6 .9% 105 3.2% 214 1.7%
Hit Fixed Object -Guardrail 1 3 .5% 56 1.7% 247 2 .0%
Hit Fixed Object -Utility Pole 1 3 .5% 146 4.5% 317 2.6%
Hit Fixed Object -Earth Bank 1 3.5% 103 3.2% 249 2.0%
Hit Fh(ed Object -Tree 1 3.5% 334 10.3% 642 5.2%
Hit Fixed Object -Mail box 1 3.5% 49 1.5% 72 0.6%
Hit Fi~d Oblect -Cu l ~grt 1 3.5% !I 1.5% 63 0.5%
Total Hit Fixed Object 20 69.0% 1,340 41.3% 3,439 27.6%
Overturn 6 20.7% 424 13.1% 1 ,281 10.3%
LIght Condition -Dark, No Street lights 12 41.4% 941 29.0% 2,014 16.2%
light Condition -Dusk ~ 13.8% 122 3.8% 412 3 .3%
TOTAL Lig ht Condition 16 55.2% 1,063 32.8% 2,426 19 .5%
Non-Intersection -Not Related 26 89.7% 2,117 65.2% 6)7 0 5 53 .9%
Road Curvature -Horizontal Curve 21 72.4% 1,282 39.5% 3 ,3 53 26 .9%
Over Centerline 9 19.1% 619 12.8% 1,60 6 9 .0%
Motorcvcl e 10 20.4% 703 15.7% 2,459 12.8%
Posted Sp eed at 50 mph 18 60.0% 1,057 25.2% 1,94 4 11.2%
Roadside safety improvements are identified in this plan to reduce the severity and number of collisions
on Kittitas County roads where it is most likely that run-off the road crashes will occur.
From a safety perspective, the Ideal roadway has roadsides that are flat and unobstructed by hazards . A
dear roadside area and a gradual slope allow drivers to safely recover control of a vehicle. This clear
recovery area is the goal in improving roadside safety but is often cost prohibitive due to the geography
of the area. In cases where it is cost prohibitive to create a fairly flat unobstructed roadside, alternative
Improvements that would reduce the severity of an impact or alert a driver to a hazard can be
considered such as breakaway features on posts, guardrail, rumble strips, or traffic delineators. This plan
focuses on these types of Improvements for reducing fatal and serious injury collisions on county
maintained roads .
Prioritization Methodology
WSDOT instructed the County to use the collision data, along with other pertinent roadway data the
County has, to identify locations for making safety improvements . The collision data that directly links
to Kittitas County's roadside characteristics shows a high percentage of fatal and serious injury collisions
are occurring on roads with steep ditches, embankments and/or fixed objects in the way. These types of
collisions are also occurring where there is no lighting, at non-intersection locations, on roadway curves
(horizontal curve), and on roads with 50 mph speed limits. Kittitas County also has a high percentage of
motorcycle collisions.
There were additional characteristics in the County's road log that also showed a high frequency of fatal
and serious injury collisions. These characteristics included whether or not the road was paved, a
pavement width of 26' or less, and an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume of 175 or more.
The locations of fatal and serious injury collisions and all of the conditions that appear to contribute to
these types of collisions are shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3
FATAL and SERIOUS INJURY Collisions in Kittitas County
>-"" ..... ~ '" '" t ~ tl \J c: :S .....
..Q ~ ~ ...... ~ t § '" ~ 0 (3 ..... '" '" ~ ..... rr: 1;; :E ~ ~ J} ~ 1 E ~ ~ t ~ cf tl {: '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" a ~ fi! I) ~ E ~ <t:.. ~ ~ ..... oS .... h 2-~ ., ~ :.. I) ;t ~ ~ I) ::. ..... 6 cf cf Q ~ II:: C\ 0 0 Q Cl ~ 0 ~
fATAL COWSIONS
'2867666 04/27/08' BOWERSRO 0.25 ....... ~-.. I( If If I( ~6 195 35
2866106 01{24/10 SPARKS RD 0.076-Y GUil rdr.rl!-Face Y If Y 28 523 25
e121763 08/Z0/U WESTSIDE RD 4.4 Y OVer Ell1bankmenl Y Y If If Y 26 551 35
El44064 12/18/11 WILSON CREEK RD 2.3 Y Fence If If 26 1587 50
2866428 05/04/12 LOOK RD lAS Y RO.3dIYayDllch If If Y Y 28 1.1 00 SO
$E1UOUS ,INJURY COWSIONS
25 ,88568 04/~6/08 tHORP I'RAIRIE RO 2.12 Y RoadWllV Ditch Y If If 26 177. 50
28'675lf4 OS}30/0B HUNTZ1NG El!. RD 1.78 Y Over Embankment Y Y Y I 24 j 4S7 SO
1867678 0&/07/0"(, Gflrr.N DOT rsno .. -y y Not Co, 1\111111
28681.02 03/07/09 FAIRVIEW IU> 7 . .015 If Y 22 372 SO
2868083 03/21/09 THORP PRAIRIE RO 0.76 If Eanh Bank or Ledge If Y Y 26 ln SO
2868116 06121/0fJ THRAU. RD .3 .97 Y Roa-awav Dllch Y Y 26 457 SO
25B8813 07/04/09 WESTSIDE RD 4.138 Y Y Y Y Y 26 551 as
2868099 07/0S/09 SUNUGHTD.R 0.5 Y Over Embankment V V Y 20 409 3S
2867832 071231109 IIlJN12INGER RD 0.423 If Y 24 437 35
lO24831 OS/09/o9 ElK H£IG~nS RD 0 _559 Y Willi V Pole Y NOI Co. Ro ad
28571170 08/22/09 REECER CREEK RD 4.857 V Roadway Ditch If V Y 24 203 SO
[027608 09/13/09 NELSON SIDING 1.60S Y Roadwav OJtch Y Y Y 26 500 50 RD
2867835 lO/09/tl9 BOWERS RD 0,25 Y Over Embunl\menl If Y Y 36 195 35
2866150 03/l8/~D REKER (RIC RD 4.838 Y Mallb.l'lC I Y Y Y 24 203-
2866132 04/14/-10 lOOKRD 3.4 Y Y If 28 900 50
2866158 08/03/10 WILSON ORK RD 7.82 y Fence Y y y If 24 196
CUlvertand'/or other
[063919 08/17/10 HANSEN RD 2.83 V Appurtenance in If V 28 306
Ditch
2866116 08/22/10 UMPTANUM RD 8.76 If If Y 0 1B2 SO
286604 2 11/09/10 BAKERS RD 0.387 V O~er Embardrmen\ If Y If 28 16 2S
2866119 11/13/10 HU~12 INGER RO 2 Y Y V If Y 24 437 50
2866168 11/).01/11 DENMARkRD 3.57 Y (;)1161 ~ml1al1kmenl If V 20 312 SO
E179966 07/09/12 WHITE 1\0 0.025 Y Y Y Y If 28 20S 35
El83902 07/13/12. ROPE RrDER DR ... Y , lee or ~I ump V Y Nol Co . Roa d
2866172 09/27j12 j.l/'ANEUM 110 2.54 Y Roillly,aV Ditch .y y v j 201 379 Iso
Due to the rural nature of our county, almost all Kittitas County roads fall under the category "no
lighting," so this characteristic was not evaluated further. Additionally, most of the roads have a
pavement width of 26' or less, so the evaluation considered only roads that are 24' or less in width to
focus on the narrowest roads for safety improvements. The "motorcycle" category was not evaluated
further because it is not a road characteristic.
In order to have the greatest potential impact in reducing collisions , the County considered roads for
evaluation and prioritization for safety improvements with the following characteristics:
MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR INCLUDING ROAD SEGMENT IN SAFETY PLAN:
• Paved (ACP, HMA, or BST).
• Pavement width of 24' or less .
• ADT of 175 or more.
• Posted speeds of 35 or more.
• Collision at this site in the past 4 years .
• Roads that have been previously Identified in the County's hazard elimination plan.
The county road segments with the characteristics listed above were prioritized using contributing
factors identified from the collision data . The prioritization factors and their scores are shown in Table
4. The resulting road segment prior itization is shown in Table 5.
TABLE 4
Key Factors and Weighted Scores
Item Number Factors and Collision Typ es Score
1 OVERAll CRITERIA MET;
Meets minimum criteria and was included In previous hazard elimination pla n 20
Does not meet minImum criteria and was included In prev ious hazard elim. plan 10
Meets mi nimum criteria but not included i n previous haza rd elim ination plan 5
2 INADEQUATE CLEAR ZONE WITH STEEP EMBANKMENT OR DITCHES (NO GUARDRAil)
Over 50% of the side slopes are too steep 20
About 10% to 50% of side sl opes too steep 10
At least one section has side slopes too steep 5
3 FIXED OBJECTS IN CLEAR ZONE (FENCE, UTILITY POLES, TREE, MAIL BO)(, ETC.)
Over 50% of the road has filled objects in clear z:one 20
About 10% to 50% o rthe road has fixed objects in clear zone 10
At least one section of the road has fixed objects in clear zone 5
4 ROADWAY CURVAllJRE -HORiZONTAL CURVE
Over 50% ofthe road Is in a horizontal curve 20
About 10% to 50% of the road is in a horizontal curve 10
At least one section of the road Is In a horizontal curve 5
5 ONE OR MORE FATAL OR SERIOUS INJURY CO W510Ilt(S) -200B THROUGH 2012 15 ea.
TABLE 5
Kittitas County's Prioritized Road Segments for Safety Improvements
(see Table 4 for score descriptions)
... ...
CI) CI) ~ ;t: J:I E QI f E a.. a.. E E ra :!: ~ QI ;:i I-~ N C') ~ ." 0 ::s z > 0
Z g> 10 'C 0 E E E E E I/)
" 'C II. CI1 < ~ III CI1 ~ ~ iii 't:I ra c QI ~ ~ ca 0 CO W ~ D-o
0 0:: {:. I/'J ...
0::
75040 HUNTZINGER RD 0.24 2.70 24 50 437 5 5 20 5 45 80
22710 WESTSIDE RD 4.10 7.29 22 35 551 5 10 10 20 30 75
75040 HUNTZINGER RD 2.70 5.07 24 50 385 5 20 20 20 0 65
75040 HUNTZINGER RD 5.07 6.99 24 50 385 5 20 20 20 0 65
52770 THORP PRAIRIE RD 0.00 3.51 26 50 177 10 0 0 20 30 60
26180 CASASSARD 0.00 1.12 22 35 308 5 10 20 20 0 65
63501 DENMARK RD 3.08 4.35 20 50 312 5 10 5 20 15 55
25850 HORVATIRD 0.00 0.46 22 35 206 20 10 10 10 0 50
75040 HUNTZINGER RD 6.99 10.74 24 50 371 5 5 20 20 0 50
40772 LYONS RD 0.00 1.49 18 50 243 20 10 20 0 0 50
29510 MIDDLe-FORK TEANAWAV 0.00 1.19 20 60 91 10 10 20 10 0 50 RD
93526 REECER CREEK RD 4.80 6.68 24 50 203 5 0 5 10 30 50
28500 TEANAWAYRD 0.00 0.02 22 50 428 20 0 10 20 0 50
43132 THOMAS RD 0.00 1.51 20 50 254 20 0 10 20 0 50
96937 UMPTANUMRD 3.10 5.22 24 50 182 5 5 20 20 0 50
13700 VIA KACHESS RD 0.00 2.22 24 25 232 10 0 20 20 0 50
25620 WATSON CUTOFF RD 0.00 1.12 22 35 153 10 10 10 20 0 50
95611 BROWNRD 1 .80 1.81 20 50 650 5 10 10 20 0 45
92276 BULLFROG RD 2.03 2.04 10 35 2170 5 0 20 20 0 45
64360 CARIBOU RD 0.00 1.10 26 35 39 10 5 20 10 0 45
64360 CARIBOURD 1.10 2.82 22 35 178 5 10 20 10 0 45
69511 CLERF RD 0.00 1.88 20 50 663 20 10 10 5 0 45
43883 COOKE CANYON RD 0.00 2.04 24 50 167 10 10 20 5 0 45
55370 HUNTERRD 0.00 1.51 20 50 333 5 10 20 10 0 45
38350 LlBERTYRD 0.00 0.07 26 35 110 10 20 10 5 0 45
22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 0.34-0.59 22 35 1609 20 20 5 0 0 45
95301 MANASTASH RD 5.58 11.01 22 35 567 5 10 10 20 0 45
95417 THORP HWY NORTH 6.54 6.63 24 35 800 5 a 20 20 0 45
95600 HANSON RD 3.08 3.60 22 35 314 5 5 20 10 0 40
33800 HOWARDRD 0.00 0.99 22 50 217 20 5 10 5 0 40
95301 MANASTASH RD 3.56 5.58 22 35 528 5 5 20 10 0 40
25B60 MCDONALD RD 0.00 0.60 20 25 89 10 0 10 20 0 40
31412 MCMANAMYRD 0.00 0.04 30 35 119 10 0 20 10 0 40
69370 PARKE CREEK RD 2.61 4.64 22 50 243 5 10 5 20 0 40
35285 ROBBINS RD 0.00 2.07 22 50 248 20 5 5 10 0 40
40315 SANDERS RD 0.13 0.25 20 35 2114 20 0 20 0 0 40
40130 SEATONRD 0.00 0.47 20 25 42 10 0 10 20 0 AD
69460 STEVENS RD 0.00 3.46 20 50 113 10 0 10 20 0 40
TABLE 5 continued
Kittitas County's Prioritized Road Segments for Safety Improvements
(see Table 4 for score descriptions)
"-.oJ
Q) Q) c .... GI .a E 0.. 0.. E 'E CD
E ... cv :E :5 Q) :::i ..... .... N f') ~ II) 0
:::I Z > '" z en ,; III "C C E E E E E I/)
"C Do Q) < ~ ~ ~ CD ~ iii "'0 cv CII C Q) :::
III 0 m w ! D-o 0 ~ 0 III -a: .....
94126 WILSON CREEK RD 7.40 8.94 24 50 196 5 0 10 10 15 40
53650 BARNES RD 0.00 0.78 20 50 373 5 10 10 10 0 35
95611 BROWNRD 1 .16 1.80 20 50 840 5 10 10 10 0 35
95501 COVERD 0.00 1.14 24 35 217 20 0 10 5 0 35
63500 FAIRVIEWRD 0.00 0.98 22 50 291 20 10 5 0 0 35
94051 GAME FARMRD 0.00 0.28 24 35 991 20 5 10 0 0 35
94051 GAME FARM RD 1.04 2 .54 20 50 205 5 10 20 0 0 35
31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 0 .00 1.20 20 50 529 20 5 10 0 0 35
35503 KERR RD 0.00 0 .28 18 50 27 10 5 20 0 0 35
54250 KILLMORE RD 0.18 2.44 20 50 200 5 10 10 10 0 35
29261 LEYRD 0.00 1.22 0 35 11 10 0 20 5 0 35
22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 0.59 2 .90 22 35 409 5 10 10 10 0 35
25680 NORTH FORKTEANAWAY 0.00 5.80 22 50 118 10 5 10 10 0 35 RD
53010 RIVERBOTTOM RD 0.00 1 .83 20 35 755 5 10 10 10 0 35
64860 STINGLEY RD 0.00 0 .51 18 25 120 10 0 20 5 0 35
56770 TANEUM RD WEST 2.64 4 .80 20 35 72 10 10 5 10 0 35
28500 TEANAWAYRD 0.02 0.11 22 50 428 5 20 5 5 0 35
28500 TEANAWAYRD 0.73 7.29 22 50 201 5 10 10 10 0 35
22710 WESTSIDE RD 2.14 3.94 22 35 438 5 10 10 10 0 35
42271 ALFORD RD 0.00 0.15 28 50 410 10 0 0 20 0 30
41271 BRICK MILL RD 4.10 4 .67 20 50 524 5 5 10 10 0 30
95611 BROWNRD 1.81 2.68 18 50 767 5 5 10 10 0 30
95501 COVE RD 1.14 2.15 24 50 295 5 10 5 10 0 30
23210 HUNDLEYRD 0.00 1.43 28 35 916 10 5 10 5 0 30
31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 1.74 2 .84 20 50 669 5 5 20 0 0 30
40271 JUDGE RONALD RD 0.00 0.13 16 35 118 10 0 20 0 0 30
22512 LAMBERTRD 0.00 1.09 20 35 285 5 5 20 0 0 30
34383 LOWER GREEN CANYON RD 0.00 0.28 24 50 201 20 5 0 5 0 30
42000 NANEUM RD 0 .00 1.00 20 35 708 20 0 10 0 0 30
42000 NANEUMRD 2.54 4 .11 20 50 379 5 0 5 5 15 30
42012 RADERRD 0.00 1.35 24 50 240 20 0 10 0 0 30
40315 SANDERS RD 0.50 1.03 20 35 1630 5 0 20 5 0 30
95417 THORP HWY NORTH 7.69 10.43 20 50 207 5 0 5 20 0 30
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0.00 0.34 28 50 2949 10 0 0 20 0 30
64756 UPPER BADGER POCKET RD 1.27 5.61 22 50 380 5 0 5 20 0 30
54150 WEAVER RD 0.00 2 .18 20 50 331 20 0 5 5 0 30
94126 WILSON CREEK RD 0.00 0.50 22 35 1755 20 0 10 0 0 30
23010 AIRPORT RD (CLE ELUM) 0,41 2.73 22 35 262 5 5 10 5 a 25
TABLE 5 continued
Kittitas County's Prioritized Road Segments for Safety Improvements
(see Table 4 for score descriptions)
... ....
QI QI C .. .a E QI 'E ~ E D.. D.. E III ~ ~ QI :J 5 .... N CO') ~ '" 0
:::J Z > 0
z til "C III "0 E E E E E I/)
"C D.. CD « 1! III QI ! G) ~ "0 III QI J: III -= .= -= III 0 III LU jij D..
0 a: ~ U) ..
" 23370 BALLARD HILL RD 0.00 0.82 20 35 173 10 5 5 5 0 25
93075 BENDERRD 0.59 0.68 20 35 1471 5 10 10 0 0 25
41271 BRICK MILL RD 0.97 2.42 20 50 517 5 10 10 0 0 25
41271 BRICK MILL RD 6.19 6.43 24 50 337 5 0 20 0 0 25
95630 BRONDT RD 0 .00 0.62 20 50 228 5 10 10 0 0 25
95611 BROWN RD 0.00 1.16 20 35 693 5 10 5 5 0 25
32011 CLARKE RD 0.00 1.31 22 35 71 10 5 10 0 0 25
63500 FAIRVIEWRD 5.03 6.05 18 50 185 5 10 10 0 0 25
63500 FAIRVIEW RD 6.05 7.42 20 50 731 5 10 10 0 0 25
63500 FAIRVIEWRD 7.42 8.07 22 50 372 5 0 5 0 15 25
62701 FERGUSON RD NORTH 1.02 2.01 22 50 334 5 10 10 a 0 25
94051 GAME FARMRD 0.28 0.67 22 35 991 5 10 10 0 0 25
94051 GAME FARMRD 0.67 1.04 24 35 991 5 10 10 0 0 25
25502 GODAWALANE 0 .00 0.68 0 50 94 10 0 10 5 0 25
65000 HAMILTON RD 0.00 1.03 20 50 176 5 10 10 0 0 25
64261 HEMINGS'rON RD 0.52 0.95 24 50 281 5 0 20 0 0 25
34002 KLOCKE RD 0.00 0.53 24 35 211 5 5 10 5 0 25
22770 LOWER PEOH POINT RD 2.90 5.05 20 35 221 5 10 10 0 0 25
95301 MANASTASH RD 1.36 3.35 24 50 1326 5 10 10 0 0 25
22650 RED BRIDGE RD 0.00 0.16 22 25 191 10 0 5 10 0 25
56280 SISTERS RD 0.00 0.61 20 35 78 10 0 10 5 0 25
56160 STRANDE RD 0.71 0.78 22 35 300 5 0 10 10 0 25
56770 TANEUM RD EAST 0.00 1.00 22 50 158 10 Ii 10 0 0 25
95417 THORP HWY NORTH 5.65 6.42 22 35 908 5 0 10 10 0 25
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0.34 0.43 24 50 2332 5 0 0 20 0 25
24610 UPPER PEOH POINT RD 5.32 6.56 24 35 500 5 0 0 20 0 25
23010 AIRPORT RD (CLE ELUM) 0.23 0.41 22 35 843 5 0 10 5 0 20
68910 BADGER POCKET RD 0.00 0.57 22 50 689 5 0 10 5 a 20
68910 BADGER POCKET RD 3.35 4.39 18 50 282 5 10 Ii 0 0 20
93075 BENDER RD 0.00 0.69 24 35 '10471 5 10 5 0 0 20
41271 BRICK MILL RD 0.09 0.97 22 50 470 5 10 5 0 0 20
41271 BRICK MILL RD 2.42 3.22 20 35 868 5 5 5 5 0 20
41271 BRICK MILL RD 3.22 4.10 20 35 868 5 0 10 5 0 20
40600 BRICK RD 1.12 1.22 22 35 1050 5 5 5 5 0 20
95501 COVE RD 2.15 3.14 24 50 437 5 5 5 5 0 20
63501 DENMARKRD 0.00 0.50 20 50 96 10 10 0 0 0 20
93025 DRY CREEK RD 0 .64 0.99 26 35 851 10 5 0 5 0 20
93025 DRYCREEKRD 2.32 2.42 24 35 300 5 5 5 5 0 20
TABLE 5 continued
Kittitas County's Prioritized Road Segments for Safety Improvements
(see Table 4 for score descriptions)
... ...
Cb Cb c ~ QI .0 E Q. Q. E E e E I'll ~ :iE ~ :J ~ .... ('II C'l "It Il'I 0
::I ;Z 0 z 0. III '0 0 E E E E E III
"0 'C D.. GI c( ! ~ GI QI ! ~ 'C CO Cb C QI = = I'll 0 m w iii Q. ~ 0 0:: -11)
0::: ~
63500 FAIRVIEWRD 0 .98 1.94 22 50 291 5 10 5 0 0 20
95301 MANASTASH RD 0.00 0.74 28 50 1518 10 5 5 0 0 20
63245 PAYNE RD 0 .00 1.55 18 50 249 5 0 10 5 0 20 .
15740 RAILROAD 5T 0 .00 0.71 32 35 470 10 0 0 10 0 20
33513 SMITHSON RD 0 .00 2.78 20 50 80 10 5 5 0 0 20
56160 STRANDERD 0.00 0.71 18 35 300 5 0 10 5 0 20
55550 THORP CEMETERY RD 0.00 3.02 24 50 338 5 0 6 10 0 20
95417 THORP HWV NORTH 6.79 7.69 20 50 339 5 5 5 5 0 20
95417 THORP IftNY SOUTH 1 .74 3.35 24 50 515 5 0 5 10 0 20
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 3.35 4.72 24 50 684 5 0 5 10 0 20
96937 UMPTANUMRD 2.68 3.10 24 50 364 5 0 10 5 0 20
64756 UPPER BADGER POCKET RD 5.61 6.29 22 50 320 5 0 5 10 0 20
22710 WESTSIDERD 0 .19 0.25 34 35 1009 10 a 0 10 0 20
94126 WILSON CREEK RD 6.66 7.40 24 50 271 5 0 10 5 0 20
95611 BROWNRD 2.68 2.13 22 50 600 5 0 5 5 0 15
13090 CABIN CREEK RD 0.00 0.02 24 25 39 10 5 0 0 0 15
95501 COVE RD 3.14 3.72 24 50 661 5 5 5 0 0 15
63501 DENMARK RD 0.50 3 .08 20 50 218 5 5 5 0 0 16
34761 FAUSTRD 0.00 0.23 22 35 219 5 0 10 0 0 16
34761 FAUST RD 0.23 0.46 22 35 309 5 5 5 0 0 15
31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 1.20 1.50 20 35 529 5 5 5 0 0 15
31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 1.50 1.74 20 50 529 5 5 5 0 0 15
31510 HUNGRY JUNCTION RD 2.84 3.25 20 50 550 5 0 10 0 0 16
54250 KILLMORE RD 0.00 0 .1 8 22 50 280 5 6 0 5 0 15
40761 LOOKRD 0.00 0.59 28 50 1233 10 0 0 5 0 15
95301 MANASTASH RD 3.35 3.56 24 50 831 5 0 10 0 0 15
56260 MELLERGAARD RD 0.00 0.47 18 50 301 6 0 10 0 0 15
62502 MOERD 0.00 1.63 20 50 347 5 0 10 0 0 15
96200 NO.6RD 0.00 0.26 24 50 2122 5 0 10 0 0 15
96200 NO .6RD 3 .58 5 .10 20 50 692 5 0 5 5 0 15
94326 NO. 81 RD 0.53 1 .00 24 35 1334 5 0 10 0 0 16
69760 PFENNINGRD 0.97 1.08 20 35 1925 5 0 10 0 0 15
53010 RIVERBOTTOM RD 1.83 3.06 22 35 667 5 0 5 5 0 15
54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 0.00 0.09 20 50 769 5 5 5 0 0 16
64510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 0 .09 0.96 20 50 769 5 0 10 0 0 15
54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 1.20 2.72 22 50 480 5 0 5 5 0 15
40315 SANDERS RD 1 .03 1.13 20 35 1517 Ii 0 10 0 0 15
43163 SCHNEBLY RD 0 .00 1.04 22 50 135 10 0 5 0 0 15
TABLE 5 continued
Kittitas County's Prioritized Road Segments for Safety Improvements II
(see Table 4 for score descriptions)
... ....
Q) GI c ~ .c E GI GI
E Q.. D-E E ..
III ~ ~ GI :J I-.... <'4 CO) ~ It) 8 ::J Z > 0 E E E E E I/) z til IV "C 'C " 0.. ID < .:! ID CII CII ~ 'i "C III CI) C GI :: :: :: .. ra 0 m w ] Il. 0
0 0:: {:. en ..
0:
66912 SORENSONRD 4.18 4.86 24 50 175 5 0 10 0 0 15
29260 SWAUK PRAIRIE RD 0.00 0.10 28 35 42 10 0 5 0 0 15
28500 TEANAWAY RD 0 .11 0.73 24 50 426 5 5 5 0 0 15
95417 THORP HWY NORTH 5.54 5.65 28 50 1205 10 0 5 0 0 15
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 0 .43 1.55 24 50 1758 5 0 5 5 0 15
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 4 .72 5.16 24 50 680 5 5 5 0 0 15
62505 TOZERRD 0.60 1.02 24 50 217 5 0 5 5 0 15
54150 WEAVERRD 2 .18 3.65 20 50 331 5 0 5 5 0 15
94126 WILSON CREEK RD 2.55 4 .09 24 50 602 5 a 5 5 0 15
68910 BADGER POCKET RD 0.57 1.30 22 50 671 5 0 5 0 0 10
41271 BRICK MILL RD 0.00 0.09 24 50 70 10 0 0 0 0 10
41271 BRICK MILL RD 4 .87 5.13 22 50 290 5 0 5 0 0 10
40600 BRICK RD 0 .98 1.12 20 35 1517 5 0 5 0 0 10
95501 COVE RD 3.72 4.14 24 50 661 5 0 5 0 0 10
95501 COVERD 4.19 4.42 20 50 238 5 0 5 0 0 10
51600 ELK HEIGHTS RD 0 .00 0.20 24 50 800 5 0 0 5 0 10
62502 MOE RD 1.63 2.30 20 50 397 5 0 5 0 0 10
42380 MOREAU RD 0.00 0.53 16 50 22 10 0 0 0 0 10
42000 NANEUMRD 1.99 2.54 24 50 183 5 0 5 0 0 10
42000 NANEUMRD 4 .11 4.86 20 50 202 5 0 5 a 0 10
42000 NANEUM RD 4.86 5.13 22 50 202 5 0 5 0 0 10
96200 NO .6RD 0 .36 0.68 24 50 2122 5 0 5 0 0 10
96200 NO.6RD 0.86 1.02 24 50 1822 5 a 5 0 0 10
94326 NO. 81 RD 0.10 0.34 24 35 1517 5 0 5 0 0 10
94326 NO. 81 RD 0.34 0.53 24 35 1393 5 0 5 0 0 10
69760 PFENNING RD 1.53 1 .97 20 35 776 5 0 5 a 0 10
93526 REECER CREEK RD 0.00 0.05 64 35 3055 10 0 0 0 0 10
35285 ROBBINS RD 2.07 2.82 22 50 250 5 0 5 0 0 10
54510 ROBINSON CANYON RD 0 .96 1.20 20 50 769 5 0 5 0 0 10
66912 SORENSONRD 2 .03 2 .55 22 50 313 5 0 5 0 0 10
66912 SORENSON RD 2.55 4 .10 22 50 218 5 0 5 0 0 10
66912 SORENSON RD 4.10 4.18 22 50 248 5 0 5 0 0 10
13530 SPARKS RD 0.00 0.41 28 35 523 10 0 0 0 0 10
56160 STRANDERD 0.78 1.47 20 35 568 5 0 5 0 0 10
95417 THORP HWY NORTH 6.B3 6.79 24 35 600 5 0 5 0 0 10
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 5.16 5.31 24 35 B80 5 0 5 0 0 10
96751 THRALLRD 6 .23 7.25 20 50 190 5 0 5 0 0 10
62505 TOZERRD 0.00 0.80 20 50 284 5 0 5 0 0 10
TABLE 5 continued
Kittitas County's Prioritized Road Segments for Safety Improvements
(see Table 4 for score descriptions)
... ..
ell ell c ~ GI .Q E Il. D-E E f E III ::E ::!: ~ :J ~ .... 1'\1 M 'It 10 0
:::I Z U
Z a, -0 "C C E E E E E en
"D D. CIl < 1:1 III 1! 1! CIl iQ "D III ell C III :: ::
III 0 m w B Q. 1)
0 0:: ~ en -0::
94126 WILSON CREEK RD 0.50 0.63 22 35 1454 5 0 5 0 0 10
94126 WILSON CREEK RD 0.63 1.01 24 35 1447 5 0 5 0 0 10
, 94126 WILSON CREEK RD 5.33 6.66 24 50 567 5 0 5 0 0 10
42271 ALFORD RD 0.15 1.07 22 50 567 5 0 0 0 a 5
95501 COVE RD 4 .14 4.19 20 50 238 5 0 0 0 0 5
42000 NANEUMRD 1.00 1.52 22 50 447 5 0 0 0 0 5
42000 NANEUM RD 1.52 1.99 24 50 295 5 a a 0 0 5
23520 NO .5 MINE ROAD 0.08 0.14 18 50 428 5 0 0 0 0 5
96200 NO .6RD 0 .26 0.36 24 50 2122 5 0 0 0 0 5
96200 NO .6RD 0.68 0.86 24 50 2057 5 0 0 0 0 5
94326 NO. 81 RD 1.00 2 .54 24 50 742 5 0 0 a 0 5
53210 SUSANRD 0.00 0.43 24 35 259 5 0 0 0 0 5
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 1 .55 1 .66 24 50 1400 5 0 0 0 0 5
95417 THORP HWY SOUTH 1.66 1.74 24 50 1000 5 0 0 0 0 5
96751 THRALL RD 5 .68 6.23 20 50 190 5 0 0 0 0 5
68750 T JOSSEM CONNECTION 0.00 0.09 20 50 797 5 0 0 0 0 5
65002 PRATERRD 0.00 1.42 22 50 153 0 0 0 0 0
Cost Effective Safety Improvements
Kittitas County proposes to improve the safety of the following road segments that received a score of
SO or higher.
1. Huntzinger Road MP 0.24 to MP 6.99
2. Westside Road MP 4.10 to MP 7.29
3. Thorp Prairie Rd MP 0.00 to MP 3.51
4. Casassa Road MP 0.00 to MP 1.12
5. Denmark Road MP 3.08 to MP 4.35
6. Horvatt Road MP 0.00 to MP 0.46
7. lyons Road MP 0.00 to MP 1.49
8. MF Teanaway MP 0.00 to MP 1.19
9. Reecer Creek Rd MP 4.80 to MP 6.68
10. Teanaway Road MP 0.00 to MP 0.02
11. Thomas Road MP 0.00 to MP 1.51
12. Via Kachess Rd MP 0.00 to MP 2.22
13. Watson Cutoff Rd MP 0.00 to MP 1.12
low cost safety improvements for these locations will include removing roadside safety hazards,
reducing steep side slopes if It isn't cost prohibitive, and either alerting or protecting drivers from
running off the side of the road with guardrail, rumble strips, or traffic delineators -as deemed needed
using engineering standards. Vicinity maps for these locations are on the following pages.
Priority 1. Huntzinger Road
1.12 (mi)
Priority 3. Thorp Prairie Read
0.00 (real)
E c
~
3.08 (m i)
4.35 (m i)
-0 96 .e! ~9J ~
(b 4f~
Thrall Rd
;'" Priority 5. Denmark Road
~,<, .. -c-_------r----'
d'//
~P" ...... 6 ·
Fa
'0 "0 ~ cr:
~ Q) .D
I.e os Ii
~
e
!
-::1fIr __ -~~$J:~-~=======L\I'
Cas . (fa n
P\'iorily 8. Middle Fork T.anawayRoad
I:r
S ht il;on Rd t; ~ .~",
J/
'0
I "Er'
~ !r
~
Iii
Co>
'" ~_r Priority 9. Reecer Creek Road
"0 ~",,\t\s~j
Q:
c I' ~ c
d
c:
III
~ ~ al
J [ -----=-,4.80 (mil j-
... ,lin .
f
ii'
PriDrity 12 \1\8 Kache •• Road
U er Peoh Point R
~ITTIT.A..S COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Mark Cook, Director
June 15,2016
TO:
Brian Hunter
Assistant Local Programs Engineer
South Central Regional Office
2809 Rudkin Rd.
Union Gap, W A 98903-1648
Mr. Hunter,
Following our conversation on June 8th , 2016 regarding the reallocation of Highway Safety
Improvements Program (HSIP) funds associated with Westside and Huntzinger Roads, I am
providing you with this proposed amendment to the grant application previously submitted in
June of2014.
The original grant application prioritized approximately $577,000 of the HSIP funds to be used
on improvements to Westside Road, and approximately $18,000 on improvements to Huntzinger
Road.
Once detailed investigations began in order to facilitate the designs, an alternative was identified
for the improvements along Westside Road from MP 4.10 to MP 7.29 that will still improve
safety but vastly reduce the original cost estimate. Also it has been realized that our scope of
Huntzinger Road from MP 0.24 to MP 2.70, which was our number one priority in the original
application was grossly under scoped as a signing and delineation project. Kittitas County staff
and our Design Consultant have evaluated Huntzinger Road and determined the need for
additional guardrail is a high priority.
The overall cost savings for the new alternative at Westside Road is projected to be
approximately $300,000. Kittitas County would like to amend the grant application and
reallocate the aforementioned savings for improvements along Huntzinger Road. We are
proposing the deployment of additional guardrail to protect hazardous slopes and water features
that are within the milepost limits of the original grant application. A detailed description of the
locations and approximate costs for these improvements are detailed below:
• MP 0.65 to MP 0.83 $30,000
• MP 0.88 to MP 0.94 $10,000
411 N. Ruby. Suite #1
Ellensburg, WA 98926
TEL (509) 962-7523
FAX (509) 962-7663
Dept. of Public Works
Page 2
• MP 1.04 to MP 1.13 $15,000
• MP 1.20 to MP 1.50 $60,000
• MP 1.75 to MP 1.95 $40,000
• MP 2.05 to MP 2.30 $45,000
• MP 2.32 to MP 2.53 $43,000
• MP 2.58 to MP 2.69 $20,000
Kittitas County is requesting to retain our current funds and re-task them in a fashion we feel will
be better spent improving the safety of the traveling public.
Please feel free to contact me for any additional information.
Thanks,
G. Lucas Huck, P.E.
County Engineer
Kittitas County Public Works
Phone 509-962-7523
411 N. Ruby, Suite #1
Ellensburg, WA 98926
TEL (509) 962-7523
FAX (509) 962-7663
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITIITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION
NO. (pDIS~ og i
TO AUTHORIZE CHAIR SIGNATURE ON THE PROSPECTUS FOR THE
KITTITAS COUNTY ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS: Kittitas County Public Works is managing Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Highway Safety Improvements Program (HSIP) funds to construct safety
improvements to Westside And Huntzinger Roads and
WHEREAS: The County was authorized $594 ,900 for the project ; and
WHEREAS: Washington State Department of Transportation, Local Programs will administer
the funds; and
WHEREAS: The County will pay a design cost-share of 10%; and
WHEREAS: The County will not pay a construction cost-share if construction is complete in
2016; and
WHEREAS: This project is included in the county transportation improvement plan; and
WHEREAS: FHWA requires Chair signature on the prospectus for funding obligation .
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners , in the best
interest of the public, does hereby authorize Chair signature on the Kittitas County
Road Safety Improvements project prospectus.
DA TED this 5th day of May 2015, at Ellensburg , Washington .
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITA~ CO~NTYjWASHINGTON ~~~,J
PI , CommiSSioner --
Washington State
Department of Transportation
Local Agen'cy Pederal Aid
Project Prospectus
Date 05105/2015 Prefix Route ( J
Federal Aid HSIP ODDS DUNS Number 01-020-2547 ProiectNumber
Local Agency ( WSDOT)
Proiect Number RC1561 Use Only
Federal Employer
Tax 10 Number 91-6001349
Agency j CAAgency Federal Program Title
Kittitas County Public Works 181 Yes 0 No 181 20.205 o Other
~ -
Project Title Start Latitude N Vark's Start Longitude W Varies
Kittitas County Road Safety Jmprovcmcnts Project
End latitude N Varies End Longitude W Varies
Project Termini From" To I Nearest City Name I Project Zip Code (+ 4)
Kittitas and Cle Elum 98934,98926
Begin Mile Post Award Type
0.24/4.10
End Mile post l Length of Project
2.7017.29 5.65 Miles 181 Local 0 Local Forces o State o Railroad
Route 10 Begin Mile Point I End Mile Point .1 City Number County Number I County Name
19 Kittitas
WSDOT Region I Legislative District(s)
South Central Region 13
I ~ongreSSiOnal District(s) I Urban Area Number
Total Local Agency Federal Funds Phase Start
Phase Estimated Cost Funding Date
JNearest Hundred Dollar) _ (Nearest Hundred Dollar) (Nearest Hundred Dollar) Month Year
P.E. $92 776 $9278 $83498 06/2015
RNV --
Const. $511.402 $511 402 03/20]6
Total $604,1 78 $9.278 $594 ,900
Description of Existin9. Facility (Existin9. Design and Present Condition)
Roadway Width I ~umber of Lanes
Huntzinger Road -24 feeti Westside Road -22 feet
Bridge railings at one location does not have proper guardrail at the approaches. Some roadsides are oversteepened. Some
curves do not have proper signage and markings.
Description of Proposed Work
Description of Proposed Work (Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary)
Install safety improvements which may include but not be limited to delineators, signage, bridge-rail retrofit, guardrail, and
related improvements.
Local Agency Contact Person Ti tle Phone
Douglas lJ 1"1 untIL CounlV L::ng ineQr 509-962-7690
Mailing Address I Ci ty I State Zip Code
411 North Ruby . Suite 1 EJIcl\5bul'~ WA 98926
~ Project Prospectus Approval Approving Authority
Title Courtl}~~eer Date 04/2812015 -
DOT Form 140-101
Revised 04/2015
• Previous Editions Obsolete + Page 1
Agency I Project Title I Date
Kittitas County Public Works Kittitas County Road Safety Improvements Project 05/05/2015
Right of Way
~ No Right of Way Needed I o Right of Way Needed
• All construction required by the o No Relocation o Relocation Required
contract can be accomplished
within the existing right of way. !
Utilities Railroad
o No utility work required ~ No railroad work required
~ All utility work will be completed prior to the start of the o All railroad work will be completed prior to the start of the
construction contract construction contract
o All utility work will be completed in coordination with the o All railroad work will be completed in coordination with the
construction contract construction contract
Descript ion of Utility Relocation or Adjustments and Existing Major Structures Involved in the Project
FAA Involvement
Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed project? DYes 181 No
Remarks
This project has been reviewed by the legislative body of the administration agency or agencies, or it's designee, and
is not inconsistent with the agency's comprehensive plan for community development.
Date 05 /0512015
DOT Form 140-101 EF
Revised 04/2015
Agency
By
+ Previous EdItions Obsolete + Page 3