HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-02-07-res-022-CUP-denialBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTITAS
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DENIAL
IRON HORSE SOLAR FARM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CU-1S-00006)
RESOLUTION
NO. 2017-0 -z..z..
WHEREAS, according to Kittitas County Code Title 15A, relating to Hearings and Title 17.60A
Conditional Uses, an open record hearing was held by the Kittitas County Hearing Examiner on
October 20, 2016, for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit known as Iron Horse
Solar Farm CU-15-00006 and described as follows:
The construction and operation of a 47 .5acre photovoltaic solar power generation facility
on approximately 68 acres in the Agriculture 20 zone. The subject property is accessed
off Caribou Road and located approximately 1 mile east of the City of Kittitas at 320
South Caribou Road, in a portion of Section 01, TI7N, R19E, WM in Kittitas County,
bearing Assessor's map numbersI7-19-01000-0023, 17-19-01000-0028, 17-19-01000-
0042, and 17-19-01000-0043. Proponent: OneEnergy Development LLC authorized
agent for Bill Hanson, landowner.
WHEREAS, public testimony was heard, in favor of and against the proposal; and,
WHEREAS, due notice of the hearing had been given as required by law, and the necessary
inquiry has been made into the public interest to be served by such use; and,
WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of said proposed conditional use;
and,
WHEREAS, a closed record public hearing was held by the Board of County Commissioners on
December 20, 2016 and January 10, 2016 to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation
on this matter; and,
WHEREAS, the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners make the following FINDINGS OF FACT
and CONCLUSIONS AT LAW concerning said proposed conditional use:
1. OneEnergy Development LLC authorized agent for Bill Hanson, landowner, submitted a
conditional use application for a Major Alternative Energy Facility on approximately 68 acres.
The subject property is zoned Agriculture 20. This "Utility" (KCC 17.6l.0 10{ I}) is
subcategorized as a major alternative energy facility (KCC 17 .6l.0 1 0 {9}), and as such requires
approval of a conditional use for the zone 17.61.020( 4)(b).
2. This proposal is located approximately 1 mile east of the City of Kittitas at 320 South
Caribou Road, in a portion of Section 01, TI7N, RI9E, WM in Kittitas County, bearing
Assessor's map numbers17-19-01 000-0023, 17-19-01000-0028, 17-19-01000-0042, and
17 -19-01000-0043. Access as proposed is provided for via an existing permit with
Kittitas County.
3. The Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element designates the subject
property as Rural Working and the zoning for this proposal is Agriculture 20.
4. Kittitas County Code provides under Chapter17.60A.015 provides review criteria for
conditional use permits which states that:
The Director or Board, upon receiving a properly filed application or petition, may permit
and authorize a conditional use when the following requirements have been met:
1) The proposed use is essential or desirable to the public convenience and not
detrimental or injurious to the public health, peace, or safety or to the character of
the surrounding neighborhood.
2) The proposed use at the proposed location will not be unreasonably detrimental to
the economic welfare of the county and that it will not create excessive public cost
for facilities and services by finding that
a) The proposed use will be adequately serviced by existing facilities such as
highways, roads, police and fire protection, irrigation and drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water and sewers, and schools; or
b) The applicant shall provide such facilities; or
c) The proposed use will be of sufficient economic benefit to offset additional
public costs or economic detriment.
3) The proposed use complies with relevant development standards and criteria for
approval set forth in this title or other applicable provisions of Kittitas County
Code.
4) The proposed use will mitigate material impacts of the development, whether
environmental or otherwise.
5) The proposed use will ensure compatibility with existing neighboring land uses.
6) The proposed use is consistent with the intent and character of the zoning district
in which it is located.
7) For conditional uses outside of Urban Growth Areas, the proposed use:
a) Is consistent with the intent, goals, policies, and objectives of the Kittitas
County Comprehensive Plan, including the policies of Chapter 8, Rural and
Resource Lands;
b) Preserves "rural character" as defined in the Growth Management Act (RCW
36.70A.030(15));
c) Requires only rural government services; and
d) Does not compromise the long term viability of designated resource lands.
5. The Washington State Growth Management Act mandates the county to develop a
comprehensive plan, and that within that plan a Rural Element be devised which "include
measures that apply to rural development and protect the rural character of the area as
established by the County." These measures must be used to control rural development,
assure visual compatibility of rural development with surrounding areas , reduce sprawl
and protect against conflict with the use of agricultural, forest and mineral resource lands
(RCW 36 .70A.070). "Rural Character" is defined in the Act thus:
"Rural character" refers to the patterns of land use and development established by a
county in the rural element of its comprehensive plan:
(a) In which open space, the natural landscape, and vegetation predominate over
the built environment;
(b) That foster traditional rural lifestyles, rural-based economies , and
opportunities to both live and work in rural areas;
(c) That provide visual landscapes that are traditionally found in rural areas and
communities ;
(d) That are compatible with the use of the land by wildlife and for fish and
wildlife habitat;
(e) That reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low-density development;
(t) That generally do not require the extension of urban governmental services;
and
(g) That are consistent with the protection of natural surface water flows and
ground water and surface water recharge and discharge areas.
6. Th e co ndi tional use permi'l a pplication was u bmitted to Comm u ni ty Deve l Qp mel'~t
Servi ces DS) on November lih, 2015. 0 0 December l7th 20 15 the applicatio n was
deemed incomplete following a mandated pre-application meeting between county staff
and representatives of the applicant. Materials required at that time included a
transportation concurrency application. On March 3rd , 2016 revised project materials
were submitted by the applicant who included the required information as well as an
up dated narra ti ve and S P A checldi sL ne a pplication was deeme d co mpl e te o n May
1i h 20 Iq. T he Noti ce of App li ~tj on for th conditiona l u e perm it was is ue d on M ay
23 rd 2 01 6. This notice was publi s hed in th e offic ial co un ty paper of rec o rd and was
mailed to jurisdictional government agencies, adjacent property owners and other
interested parties. The last day to submit written comments with regard to the proposal
was on June i\ 2016.
7. Kittitas County acted as the lead agency for the SEP A Environmental Checklist and
threshold determination. As per WAC 197-11-355 and KCC 15A.04.01O the county
utilized the optional DNS process. Notice was given that the County was expecting to
issue a Determination of Non-Significance, and that the notice of application comment
period (14 days) may be the only opportunity to provide comment on the environmental
impacts of the proposal.
8. T he EPA ch eckli s t wa reviewed by taff ion conju flct i n with the project n, rr at iv e . On
J un e 271h, 2 01 6 th e ap plication was p laced all ho ld by th e app Li ca1lt and re iew was
lemporarjly s uspended. "'1 Jllly 15 1h 2016 t he ap plicant r q uested tha t re iew co ntinue
and submitted supplemental documentation with respect to comments received.
9. After a detailed review of the SEPA checklist, the project narrative, supplemental
submission, and proposed mitigation measures the SEP A official determined that there
would be no significant adverse environmental impacts under the provisions of W AC
197-11-350. A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) was issued for this
project on August 10 th , 2016.
10. The appe a l pe riod for the SEPA determ inat io n en ded on August 24 th , 2016 at 5:0 0 p.m. A
timely app eal was filed with the BOC C on :A ug ust 24th , 2016 by "Save Our Fa rms ! Say
No to Ir on Horse". The appeal w as heard before the Kittitas County Hearing 'xaminer on
Thursday 0 tober 20 th , 2016. The Heari ng Exa min er issu ed a decision on Nove mb er 8th ,
2016 which, based on listed findings, held that " ... the August 1 0, 2016 SEP A
determination by the responsible official in the above referenced matter is affirmed in
every respect".
11. The H ea ri ng "xami ne r open rec ord pu blic hearing for the EP A ap pea l and the
Cond i tion al Use Permit was held on October 20th , 2016. Repre entati ve s of the applicant
presented materials and testified at the hearing . Members of the public testified. On
November 9th , 2016, the Kittitas County Hearing Examiner returned a recommendation
that the Iron Horse Solar Farm Conditional Use Permit (CU-15-00006) be approved with
the staff recommended conditions plus an additional two conditions.
12. The Board of County ommissioners conducted a closed record meeting on Decem ber
20 th , 2016 and continued the meeting to Ja nu a ry 10 th , 2017 for the purpo e of
considering the Iron Solar Farm Conditional Permit (CU-15-00006). A motion was
made and seconded that the conditional use permit be denied; the motion carried on a
vote of 2-1 with the following conclusions:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the Kittitas County Board of
Commissioners hereby deny the approval of the Iron Horse Solar Farm Conditional Use
PCl'mjt ( V-1S ... 00006) and adopt the above Findings of Fact, and Conclusions of Law.
1. Open space, the natural landscape, and vegetation would not predominate over
the built environment on the subject parcels if the proposal were approved in this
location (RCW 36.70A.030(lS».
2. The proposed use in the proposed location is not essential or desirable to the
public convenience and is detrimental or. injurious to the public health, peace, or
safety, or to the character of the surrounding neighborhood (KCC 17.60A.OlS(1»
3. The proposed use in the proposed location would not ensure compatibility with
existing neighboring land uses (KCC 17.60A.OlS(S».
4. The Proposed use in the proposed location does not preserve the "rural character"
as defined in the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.030(15» (KCC
17.60A.OlS(7)(B».
DATED this '7 -f11 day of te-.fj11Yl-Ul ... k'1 d~ , 2017 at Ellensburg, Washington.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
OPPOSED
APPROVED AS TO FORM :
Greg Zempel WSBA #19125