Letter to Representatives-HB 2516
2010-01-19 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
Letter to Representatives-HB 2516
4/6/2018 2:03:17 PM
4/6/2018 2:02:30 PM
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting document type
Request to Ratify Board Signature on Letters to Representative Judy Warnick, Bill Hinkle and Senator Janea Holmquist Regarding Proposed HB 2516
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
r r <br />�(2 KSTMAS OOUYQTY <br />January 14, 2010 <br />Kittitas County, Washington <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />District ane <br />Paul Jewell <br />Honorable Judy Warnick <br />13`s Legislative District Representative <br />403 J.L, O'Brien Building <br />PO Box 40600 <br />Olympia, WA 98504-0600 <br />Dear Representative 'Warnick: <br />District Two District Three <br />Alan Crankovich Mark McClain <br />The Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners requests you not approve House Bill 2516, <br />This proposed legislation significantly modifies the role of the Energy facility Site Evaluation Council <br />(EFSEC) by expanding its authority beyond original legislative intent to include the siting and permitting <br />of small wind energy systems. If passed, this measure would bypass local legislative authority by creating <br />an administrative process through EFSEC that would encourage individuals to apply and receive approval <br />for the placement of wind turbines up to 170 feet tall without public input; without oversight by any other <br />authority, without consideration of local regulations and zoning, and if necessary, preempting the decision <br />of a local government. <br />According to EFSEC's website "the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC <br />or Council) provides a `one-stop' siting process for major energy facilities in the State of Washington" <br />(emphasis added). Single wind turbines that are up to 170 feet tall certainly are not considered major. <br />Further supporting the intent of EFSEC to review and make recommendations for major energy facilities <br />can be found in .RCW 80.50.071 which outlines and requires certain application fees including $25,000 <br />per site plus applicable expenses of independent consultants, the council, etc. HB 2516 proposes to <br />exempt small wind energy systems from these fees. <br />Currently, RCW 80.50.090 (1) requires "the council shall conduct an informational public hearing in the <br />county of the proposed site" for all applications. Presumably, this is to comply with the legislative intent in <br />RCW 80.50.010 which states "it is the intent to seek courses of action that will balance the increasing <br />demands for energy facility location and operation in conjunction with the broad interests of the public." <br />By removing any public process or input as HB 2516 proposes for small wind energy systems, legislative <br />intent is clearly undermined. Accordingly, RCW 80.50.090 (2) further states "...the council shall conduct <br />a public hearing to determine whether or not the proposed site is consistent with city, county, or regional <br />land use plans or zoning ordinances." HB 2516 proposes to exempt small wind energy systems from the <br />basic and fundamental analysis of compatibility with local regulations. <br />In our view it is unacceptable for the state to enact laws that remove the authority of the local legislative <br />body in favor of an unelected agency which, in this proposal, will act on these applications without <br />oversight. In its current form, RCW 80.50. 100 requires EFSEC to prepare a written report to the Governor <br />with recommendations for approval or denial of an application, It is then the responsibility of the <br />Governor to make the final determination. In contrast to this well established standard, HB 2516 again <br />proposes to exempt small wind energy systems from this basic oversight, leaving full authority in the hands <br />of EFSEC alone. We already have too many instances whereby state agencies are empowered to impact <br />local conditions significantly without proper oversight or recourse. <br />Finally, HB 2516 proposes in Section 6 (3) that "a small alternative energy resource facility site <br />certification issued by the council preempts any permit issued by a local government". If passed, this <br />measure would give EFSEC ultimate authority over these facilities.. No longer would EFSEC be in place <br />for overseeing major infrastructure improvements in energy for the State of Washington and its citizens, <br />KITTITAS COLINITY COUIUMOUSE • 205 WEST 5", SUIT'F 108 - ELLENSBURG, WA 98926 <br />(509) 962-7508 - FAX(509)962-7679 <br />www.coki£Iitas.waxs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.