My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2026-9-14 CDS_SS_BRIEFINGS
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
09. September
>
2026-09-14 2:30 PM - CDS Study Session
>
2026-9-14 CDS_SS_BRIEFINGS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2026 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/9/2026 11:46:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/14/2026
Meeting title
CDS Study Session
Location
BoCC Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development be reduced. KCC 17.13.055(2)-(3) expressly authorizes decreased parcel sizes (down to <br /> one-half acre)when TDR credits are applied. On rural receiving sites this produces a more intensive built <br /> pattern inconsistent with the statutory definition of rural character. <br /> Conflict with Service Levels-RCW 36.70A.110 <br /> RCW 36.70A.110 directs that urban growth be located preferentially inside UGAs that already have or <br /> will have urban facilities and services. By making every rural land parcel a potential receiving site(KCC <br /> 17.13.030(1)(g)),the code bypasses this direction. <br /> Limits of the Innovative-Techniques-RCW 36.70A.070(5)(b) and .090 <br /> Density transfer is permitted only when the result remains consistent with rural character and is not <br /> characterized by urban growth. A program whose definitions and receiving-site list systematically <br /> authorize additional units on any rural land exceeds the intent of the TDR tool. <br /> Summary of Gaps with Code Citations <br /> Exact Code <br /> D. <br /> G-1 17.13.015 (Receiving All rural lands eligible; no RCW 36.70A.020(l)-(2); .110; <br /> site; TDR density credit); infrastructure differentiation .070(5)(c); .030(38) <br /> 17.13.030(1)(g) (May 22) <br /> G-2 17.13.030(1)(e) and(f) �PUDs and long plats increasing RCW 36.70A.070(5); .030(38) <br /> density as receiving sites (May <br /> 22) <br /> G-3 17.13.080(5)Rural rate; I Unclear application of RCW 36.70A.030(38); <br /> 17.13.055(2)-(3) "additional units"; rural 1:1 rate .070(5)(c) <br /> (May 22) <br /> G-4 17.13.015 definitions Definitions lack capacity/urban RCW 36.70A.1 10; .090 <br /> criteria(May 22) <br /> G-5 17.13.010(purpose Purpose does not constrain Internal consistency; RCW <br /> references 17.13.030(1)) receiving sites to urban/UGA 36.70A.090 <br /> G-6 Comp Plan(scattered No consolidated TDR section in RCW 36.70A.070(5)policy <br /> TDR references) Rural Element(March 27) clarity <br /> G-7 17.13.030(l)(d)-(e) + PUD spans urban/rural; RCW 36.70A.070(5)(d); .360 <br /> PUD/LAMIRD code LAMIRDs undifferentiated(both <br /> letters) <br /> Recommended Code Revisions to Close Identified Gaps <br /> Commerce's May 22 letter offers two procedural paths: amend or rescind the program, and/or adopt a <br /> temporary moratorium under RCW 36.70A.390. Kittitas County enacted a TDR moratorium on June 8, <br /> 2026,pursuant to the Department of Commerce recommendations. Substantive revisions that would <br /> resolve the cited gaps include: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.