Laserfiche WebLink
County of Kittitas,WA <br /> § 15A.08.010 PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS § 15A.08.010 <br /> CHAPTER 15A.08 <br /> JUDICIAL APPEAL <br /> § 15A.08.010. Judicial appeal. <br /> 1. Proceedings for review shall be commenced by filing a land use petition in superior court. <br /> This process shall be the exclusive means of judicial review of land use decisions, except <br /> for: <br /> a. Land use decisions of a local jurisdiction that are subject to review by a quasi-judicial <br /> body created by state law, such as the Shorelines Hearings Board or the Growth <br /> Management Hearings Board; <br /> b. Judicial review of applications for a writ of mandamus or prohibition; or <br /> C. Claims provided by any law for monetary damages or compensation. <br /> 2. The land use petition is timely if it is filed and served on all required parties within 21 days <br /> of the issuance of the land use decision pursuant to Chapter 36.70C RCW. <br /> 3. For the purposes of this section,the date on which a land use decision is issued is: <br /> a. Three days after a written decision is mailed by the local jurisdiction or,if not mailed, <br /> the date on which the local jurisdiction provides notice that a written decision is <br /> publicly available; <br /> b. If the land use decision is made by ordinance or resolution by a legislative body sitting <br /> in a quasi-judicial capacity,the date the body passes the ordinance or resolution; or <br /> C. If neither subsection(3)(a)nor(3)(b) applies,the date the decision is entered into the <br /> public record. <br /> 4. Standing to bring a land use petition is limited to the following persons: <br /> a. The applicant and the owner of property to which the land use decision is directed; <br /> b. Another person aggrieved or adversely affected by the land use decision, or who <br /> would be aggrieved or adversely affected by a reversal or modification of the land use <br /> decision. A person is aggrieved or adversely affected only when all of the following <br /> conditions are present: <br /> i. The land use decision has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person, <br /> ii. That person's asserted interests are among those that the local jurisdiction was <br /> required to consider when it made the land use decision, <br /> iii. A judgment in favor of that person would substantially eliminate or redress the <br /> prejudice to that person caused or likely to be caused by the land use decision, <br /> and <br /> iv. The petitioner has exhausted his or her administrative remedies to the extent <br /> required by law. <br /> (Ord. 98-10, 1998; Ord. 2000-07; Ord. 2025-003, 3/18/2025) <br /> Downloaded from https:Hecode360.com/KI6857 on 2026-04-22 <br />