My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Change Order 08_ALSC-Contractor Signed
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
06. June
>
2026-06-02 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Change Order 08_ALSC-Contractor Signed
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2026 12:29:13 PM
Creation date
5/28/2026 12:26:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
6/2/2026
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve Change Order #8 for the Ellensburg Rodeo Arena Project
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
144971
Type
Contract
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION <br />Ellensburg Rodeo Arena Improvements <br />1010 East 8th Ave. <br />TO:Ellensburg, WA 98926 <br />Spokane, WA 99201 <br />COPY TO : Andrew Leeper (ALSC Architects)SIGNED : <br />Project Engineer <br />Reference Sheets:AS100 <br />PIV Layout Clarification <br />Requested <br />Respond by Date:4/29/2026 <br />RFI DESCRIPTION <br />Cascade Central Construction <br />Carley Sabedra <br />Reference Sketch:SK-116.1 <br />RESPONSE TO RFI <br />Cost/Schedule Impact:Pending response, TBD. <br />Date:4/27/2026 RFI 116 <br />203 North Washington, Suite 400 <br />Project <br />RESPONSE BY: DATE: <br />The attached SK-116.1 reflects the layout required by the Fire Marshal, which includes maintaining 3 feet of clear spacing on all sides with <br />bollards due to potential vehicle and trailer traffic. <br />As shown, this configuration occupies approximately half of the sidewalk and with multiple underground utilities, making excavation in this <br />area challenging. <br />A more suitable location would be near the hydrant. Additionally, local code does not require the PIV to be connected to the fire alarm <br />system. Please confirm whether the PIV is required to be tied into the fire alarm system. <br />If a connection is not required, relocating the PIV near the hydrant would be a more cost-effective solution. If a connection is required, it <br />would necessitate trenching across the site again; however, this alternative location would still be more practical from a constructability <br />standpoint. <br />Todd Keller (ALSC Architects)Section <br />Division <br />Title <br />Let us know if moving it to the east if feasible. This would be more out of the way but understand it <br />extends the line. Kady does not want it to be by the fire hydrant as it will be an obstruction for concert <br />events etc. Keeping it off the track and BTC area is preferred. See notes below for tie in to the fire <br />alarm. <br />Todd Keller ALSC 4/28/26 <br />RESPONSE TO RFI <br />RESPONSE BY: DATE: <br />MW Electrical Comment: <br />It is recommended to utilize the fire alarm system to provide supervision of the Post Indicator Valve (PIV). It is not necessarily required to be <br />tied into the fire alarm system however, per NFPA 13, Section 16.9.3.3.1 it is required to be supervised to prevent accidental shutoff. <br />Acceptable methods of supervision are identified below: <br />1. Electronically: Monitored by a central station, proprietary, or remote station signaling service. <br />2. Local Alarm: A local signaling service that notifies building occupants of a valve closure. <br />3. Locking: Valves are locked in the open position. <br />4. Sealing: Valves are sealed within fenced enclosures under control of the owner, with inspections conducted weekly. <br />Aaron Lanegan 04-28-2026
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.