Comments_Combined_KimleyHorn - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

From: Teresa Castrilli To: Jeremy Johnston Subject: Fwd: Easton Sub Area Plan Revisions Date: Tuesday,April 21,2026 11:33:47 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Kittitas County network. Do not click links, open attachments, fulfill requests, or follow guidance unless you recognize the sender and have verified the content is safe. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Teresa Castrilli<castrcons&gmail.com> Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 11:25 AM Subject: Easton Sub Area Plan Revisions To: <eremy,Johnston&co.kttitas.wa.us> Hi Jeremy: CDS Revisions: Yes I agree,remove the "one voice" for Easton as CDS suggested based on our Community input. This is not a reality as stated. Yes I agree, remove all goal and policy references to specific possible upgrades/additions (e.g. sidewalks, lighting, day use areas, etc.) Yes I agree, remove the reference to "Consult with local septic and water experts to understand development limitations." This is a sticking point and we DO NOT WANT new growth requiring this type of investigation. Old Town South Easton is historic and as the town grows and is rebuilt it should remain as platted. Add South Easton Lamird 1 to stay within its current boundaries. This is a very important statement that I want put in the Easton Subarea plan. I own property adjacent to Lamird 1, I received a letter from CDS stating planning was taking place asking for comment, you (Jeremy) in the meeting stated letters were only sent to those bordering the Lamird. Therefore, this makes me think you the County want feedback on the Lamird 1 boundary line. KEEP Lamird 1 boundary lines as they are, we want nothing to do with expanding the boundary lines. This is a stickler for our family and want this added into the Sub Area plan. I have attended most of these meetings over the last two years just to protect my property and recreational usage in the Easton area and want this accomplished in the plan. There is plenty of work to be done just within the historic Lamird 1 boundary lines. No need to be encroaching on people's beloved private family properties. Thank you for assisting us with our concerns.